Upload
curtis-simpson
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Review of the
Annual Performance ReportSY 2009-10 Data
Brian BoughEducation Research Analyst
Data Unit
With Extra Special Help From• Dr. Patricia Abeyta Education Research Analyst
emeritus???• Sally Hollow-Horn, Special Education • Vivian Redhouse, Data Unit• Judy Duncan, Data Unit
Current Data Unit
• Brian Bough• Maureen Lesky• Jeffry White• Fellina Johnson• Judy Duncan• Vivian Redhouse
Indicator 1: Graduation Rates
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2020
All 48.7 52.45 57.73
SWD 44.1 47.08 52.44
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
All
SWD
Perc
ent R
ate
Target: Met – Decrease in gap between All Students Graduating and Students With Disabilities shrank from 5.3% to 4.2%
Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rates
Target: Not Met; however, Students With Disabilities had dropped-out less than All Students in SY2008-09.
Indicator 3: SWD Performance on Assessments• Will look at the assessment data more closely in
afternoon presentation.• Indicator examines AYP in terms of Participation Rates• Indicator examines AYP in terms of achievement• AYP is becoming an increasingly difficult target to hit
for all students and sub-groups• Due to eccentricities in AYP determinations in
Arizona, it is difficult to make a meaningful assessment based on the AYP standard
• Only 22 schools met the “minimum n” for a determination in Special Education sub-group
• Of those only 13 made AYP in the sub-group
Indicator 4: Suspensions & Expulsions• No more than 7 of the BIE high schools or 8
BIE elementary schools will report suspensions and expulsion rates greater than two times the BIE average for that group of schools.
Secondary Schools Having Significant Discrepancy in Suspension/Expulsion Rates > 10 Days
School Grade Level SWD Count
Suspension / Expulsion >10 Days
Rate S/E > 10 days
Many Farms 9-12 71 11 15.49% Greyhills Academy 9-12 78 14 17.95% Cibecue Community K-12 44 10 22.73% Crow Creek Reservation
6-12 18 4 22.22%
Lower Brule Day K-12 45 8 17.78% Nay-Ah-Shing K-12 37 6 16.22% Riverside Indian 4-12 104 22 21.15% Chief Leschi K-12 151 24 15.89% Yakama Nation 9-12 12 8 66.67% Choctaw Central H.S. 9-12 87 13 14.94% Note: Green represents n<20; deemed statistically unreliable
Target: Not Met
Elementary Schools Having Significant Discrepancy in Suspension/Expulsion Rates > 10 Days
School Grade Level
SWD Count
Suspension / Expulsion >10 Days
Rate S/E > 10 days
Santa Rosa Boarding K-8 18 3 16.67% Theodore Roosevelt 6-8 13 4 30.77% Shoshone-Bannock K-8 29 2 6.90% Wingate Elementary K-8 83 3 3.61% Lummi Tribal K-6 70 6 8.57% Choctaw Central Middle 7-8 30 2 6.67% Tate Topa Tribal K-8 82 3 3.66% Ojibwa Indian K-8 39 3 7.69% Turtle Mountain Middle 6-8 58 9 15.52%
Note: Green represents n<20; deemed statistically unreliable
Target: Not Met
Addressing Suspensions and Expulsions
• Special Education has undertaken technical assistance activities to work with schools that have behavior issues (incentives, positive behavior supports, and conflict resolution/mediation, among others)
• Don Griffin in particular has taken the lead• NASIS has been retooled to use the NCES
“Safety In Numbers” methodology for tracking and reporting behavior incidents
Indicator 8: Parent Survey
FFY 2009 Data FFY 2009 Target Total number of Parent Respondents
3,990
Number who reported school facilitated their involvement
1,507
Percentage who reported school facilitated their involvement
37.77% 33.98%
Percent of Parents Who Report the School Facilitated Their Involvement (Strongly Agree’ or “Very Strongly Agree’ categories)
FFY 2009 Data FFY 2009 Target Total number of Parent Respondents
3,990
Number who reported school facilitated their involvement
3,570
Percentage who reported school facilitated their involvement
89.47% 88.61%
Percent of Parents Who Report the School Facilitated Their Involvement (“Agree”, “Strongly Agree” or “Very Strongly Agree’ categories)
Response Rates Over Time Surveys
Distribution
Surveys Returned
FFY 2009 Data Response Rate
FFY 2009 Response Rate Target
Parent Response
6,944 3,990 57.46% 49.95%
School Site Response
174 156 89.66% 87.88%
FFY Total number of
Parent Respondents
Number who reported school facilitated their
involvement
Percentage who reported school facilitated their
involvement
Progress
FFY 2006
2,087 689 33.01%
FFY 2007
3,143 1,037 32.99% <.06>
FFY 2008
4,052 1,363 33.64% +1.97%
FFY 2009
3,990 1,507 37.77% +12.28%
Indicator 11: Child Find (60 Day Timeline)
a. Number of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was received 382
b. Number of children whose evaluations were completed within 60 days 373
Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 60 days 97.6%
Target (100%): Not Met
FFY2008 FFY2009 a. Number of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was received
482 382
b. Number of children whose evaluations were completed within 60 days
302 373
Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 60 days
62.6% 97.6%
Indicator 13: Post-Secondary Transition
• Plan to hit this topic with specialized monitoring and assistance
• Extensive use of the Desktop Auditing system through NASIS
Files Reviewed # 100% Compliance % Compliance 585 346 59.14%
Student files examined to determine whether a post-secondary transition plan is in-place.
Indicators 14-19: Due Process Items
• I will skip these
Indicator 20: Timely & Accurate Data
• 100% • Woohoooo!• Tables 1, 2, 3, & 6 are now EdFacts-Only!!!