36
Heui-Chun An, Sam-Kwang Cho, S eong-Hun Kim National Fisheries Research & Deve lopment Institute, Korea [email protected] Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asia 29th Wakefield Fisheries Bycatch Symposium May 14, 2014

Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Heui-Chun An, Sam-Kwang Cho, Seong-Hun Kim National Fisheries Research & Development Institute, Korea [email protected]

Review of Fishing Technology to

Reduce Bycatch in Asia

29th  Wakefield  Fisheries  Bycatch  Symposium  May  14,  2014

Page 2: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

! Catch & Bycatch of Asia

! Bycatch Reduction Technology

( Gillnet, Pot, Towed Gears)

! Conclusion

Contents

Page 3: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

22.9% / 6.0% (5.94)

2.05% /13.3% (0.53)

0.69% / 7.7% (0.16)

13.1% / 8.5% (3.40)

3.15% / 2.1% (0.82)

12.3% / 9.2% (3.19)

7.7% / 8.6% (2.00)

4.50% / 8.1% (1.17) 1.51% / 5.1%

(0.35)

1.60% / 4.0% (0.41)

1.88% / 4.8% (0.49)

0.22% / 3.3% (0.05)

5.12% / 3.9% (1.17)

2.41% / 1.7% (0.55)

0% / 2.6% (0)

8.58% / 4.0% (2.22)

Data from FAO (2011)

!  Catch = Marine capture production (Total 93,494 million ton) !  Area Grand total 360.7 , Asia Sub Total 85.9 (million ㎢), 23.8%

Catch and area proportions by fishing area, 2011 ( ) : catch per unit area (mt/km2)

Page 4: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Global catch by fishing area, 2011

Data from FAO yearbook. Fishery and aquaculture statistics Yearbook (2011)

-  Asia Total: include Region No 57,61,71 -  Area Grand total 360.7 , Asia Sub Total 85.9 (million ㎢), 23.8%

Region No. Nominal regions Catch (1,000MT) (%) 61 Northwest Pacific 21,437 22.93 71 Western Central Pacific 11,521 12.32 57 Indian Ocean, Easten 7,212 7.71 87 Southeast Pacific 12,254 13.11 27 Atlantic, Northeast 8,021 8.58 51 Indian Ocean, Western 4,212 4.50 67 Northeast Pacific 2,950 3.15 77 Eastern Central Pacific 1,913 2.05 41 Atlantic, Southwest 1,759 1.88 31 Atlantic, Western Central 1,497 1.60

Others 20,718 22.16   Global Total 93,494 100.00

Asia Total 40,170 42.96

Page 5: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Sea Food Culture of Asia

Fish meal

Fish sauce

Salted seafood Dried fish products(pollack )

SeaFood

http://ourdailybrine.com/

http://100.empas.com/

Salted fermented seafood

http://www.pangasius-vietnam.com/

www.tradekorea.com

Surimi

Page 6: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

6

(Prof  Arimoto,  FAO/SEAFDEC  Workshop  on  by-­‐catch  and  discards  2003  Bangkok)  

Alaska Sea Grant - “bycatch” include retained incidental catch, fishery discards, and unobserved mortalities as a result of direct encounters with fishing gear

By-catch and Discards are not a new problem, it exists since fishing began

Page 7: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Up-dated Global Estimates of 6.8 mil. Tons (2005) Estimated global discards by countries (1000 tons)

Asian countries Discards (%) Cambodia 0.0 0.0 China 74.3 1.1 Indonesia 270.4 4.0 Japan 918.4 13.5 Korea 1.0 0.0 Malaysia 10.4 0.2 Myanmar 27.4 0.4 North Korea 1.1 0.0 Philippines 7.5 0.1 Thailand 27.8 0.4 Viet Nam 17.8 0.3 Others 5463.1 80.1 Global Total 6819.2 100.0

Formulated on data from Kelleher (2005)

7 MATSUOKA T., 2009,Negative impacts in capture fisheries: bycatch and discards and derelict fishing gear and ghost fishing. PICES meeting.

Page 8: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Sub Area Ratio By-Catch:Shrimp References

II~VI

B i n t u n i , Kaimana, D o l a k , Aru

4:1~21:1 Iskandar et al. (1993), Badrudin & Karyana (1993), others (1993~2002)

By-catch ratio to shrimps caught by shrimp trawler in the Arafura waters, Indonesia (1992~2001)

WUDIANTO and BAMBANG SUMIONO, 2010. BYCATCH MITIGATION ON SHRIMP TRAWL FISHERIES IN INDONESIA. Meeting on Coral Triangle Fishers Forum

Page 9: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Growth overfishing and trash fish landings, Malaysia

AREA Trash fish landings (tonnes) % trash in trawl Landi

ngs Trawlers All methods % by trawlers

West Coast Peninsular Malaysia 132,304 169,709 77.96 35.99

East Coast Peninsular Malaysia 58,777 60,599 96.99 38.54

Sabah, Sarawak & Labuan 23,899 31,362 76.20 16.88

Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49

Nuruddin & Isa (2013)

Page 10: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

MATSUOKA T., 2009,Negative impacts in capture fisheries: bycatch and discards and derelict fishing gear and ghost fishing. PICES meeting.

GF :Ghost fishing.

Kaeser et.al. Erzini et.al. Nakashima-Matsuoka

Net length (m) 90 100 72

Net height (m) 3.0 2.1 2.3

Mesh size (mm) 100 60 60~99

Major GF species Cat-sharks

Nursehound Scorpionfishes

Sea breams Threadsail filefish

Dragonet

GF duration (days) 141 56 142

GF mortality (number) 334 318 455

Accumulation of data by researches on Ghost Fishing (GF) by gillnets on flat seabed

Page 11: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Bycatch Reduction Methods

•  BRD : Bycatch Reduction Devices •  TED, Fish eye, BED, JTED, ETC..,

Fishing Gear Selectivity (Mesh , Bar etc. ) Vent BRD

Gillnet ○

Pot ○ ○

Dredge ○ ○

Trawl ○ ○

Page 12: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Bycatch Reduction in Snow Crab Gillnet, Korea

Park et al. 2003

Snow crab 97.12% Spinyhead sculpin 0.81% Pacific cod 0.18%

Catch rate of major species in snow crab gillnet

Trap, 560MT 12%

Other 3MT 0%

Trawl 47MT 1%

Gill net 4,207MT 87%

Page 13: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Catch per net by mesh size

0

4

8

12

16

20

150 180 210 240 270 300 330

Mesh size (mm)

Cat

ch n

umbe

r / n

et

Male (>90 mm)Male (≤90 mm)

Female crab

Park et al. 2003

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Maximum carapace length / Mesh size

Ret

entio

n pr

obab

ility

. 62.567.572.577.582.587.592.597.5102.5107.5112.5117.5122.5127.5

RL (mm)

RL/m = 0.549

exp(cubic equation)

Mesh selectivity of male snow crab

- Used mesh size : 180 ~300 mm (5steps)

- Retention Probability 0.5 → RL/m=0.356

(RL: Maximum carapace length, m: mesh size) - Snow crab CL 90mm → optimal mesh size 253mm

Page 14: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Item Before 2002 After 2002

Mesh size of gillnets 180 – 270 mm 240 mm ≤

Fishing season 11.01 ~ 05.31 12.01 ~ 05.31

Landing size (carapace length) 90mm 90mm

Female × ×

Park et al. 2003

Advanced Management efforts for snow crab

Page 15: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Use of escape vents to improve size and species selectivity of collapsible pot for Portunus pelagicus in Thailand

- Collapsible crab pot: box shaped with size of 36 × 54 × 19 cm

Boutson et al. (2009)

- Four different shapes of escape vent (a), located at the bottom sides of the lower slope panel (b) used to observe the escape behavior of blue swimming crabs from the pot

http://en.wikipedia.org

Boutson et al. [2005] immature blue swimming crab catch: 32–42%

- Square-shaped escape vents were located at five pairs of different positions: on the lower slope panel at the corner (1) and center (2), on the side panel at upper (3) and lower (4) positions, and at the top panel corner (5) to observe escape behavior of crabs from the same pot for the vent position experiment

"  Escape rate : Square(70%) > Circle(18%) > Rectangular(10%) > Ellips(2%)

"  Escape Position : 4(84%) > 1(14%) > 2(2%)

Page 16: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

A Size selectivity for blue swimming crab according to escape vent length when vent height was fixed at 35 mm, b master curve for crab size (CL) according to vent length (VL)

- Blue swimming crab size sampled with conventional pots (open columns) and vented pots (shaded columns)

- Size selectivity of 35 x 45 mm escape vent for blue swimming crab from the field trials with L50% = 46.9 mm, a = -25.9403, b = 0.5528, and SR = 4.0 mm, in comparison with the result from the laboratory observation

Boutson et al. (2009)

First maturity size of crab  : 46 mm CL L50%(vent 35 × 45 mm) = 46.9 mm

Reducing catch of immature crab: 70.5 → 11.0%

Page 17: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Tottori 2009 report

-  Red queen crab trap with vent. -  Mesh size 130mm, vent dia 95mm

Size selectivity of red queen crab traps in Japan

- Selectivity curve of vented traps, the commercial trap (150 mm mesh size)

- Selectivity master curve of circular escape vent in trap for male red queen crab.

Landing 𝐬𝐢𝐳𝐞  (𝐂𝐋): 90mm, L50 escape vent dia: 93mm

- Specification for the vents trap used in experiment

Mesh size 150mm, escape vents: 90, 100, 110 mm

Watanabe T. 2005. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 71, 16-23.

Page 18: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Selectivity of Venus Clam Dredge in Korea

- Beam of dredge: 1,200L × 370H mm, net 4m

- Bar space : 12, 16, 20, 24, 35 mm

- Mesh size of net: 22, 24, 30, 41, 47 mm

Shellfish Dredge

KIM & Jo (2001)

http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=774312

645 370

420300

1,200

steel t2 x 150(B) x 550(L)

Page 19: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

(b) Selection shell length - Selection curves for venus clam, Gomphina melanaegis.

KIM & Jo (2001)

(a) Mesh size

L75 = 0.8665M - 0.376

(R2 = 0.9828)

L25 = 0.5396M - 0.2177

(R2 = 0.8964)

0

1

2

3

4

2 3 4 5

Mesh size (cm)

Shell

Length

(cm

)•  First maturity length 25mm

•  Optimum mesh size for 25mm Venus clam: 40.5mm

•  Regulation: mesh size ≥40mm , bar space ≥15mm,

Landing size of Venus Clam ≥35mm

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

0.05 1.05 2.05 3.05 4.05 5.05 6.05

Shell length (cm)

Rete

ntio

n

24mm 30mm 41mm 47mm

Page 20: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Crab separator for flatfish seine

•  Developed to exclude snow crab while retaining flatfish

wing

Belly slope

Selection mesh

Chaffer

Belly slope

Snow crab reduction : approx. 90 %

Flatfish retention : approx. 85%

Matsushita and Fujita (2004) Horie et. al., (2001)

Page 21: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Plan of codend

Schematic diagram of codend

- Plan of codend and schematic diagram of codend and grid separator used in the fishing experiment.

Selectivity of grid separator with horizontal bars for beam trawl fishery in Tokyo Bay

Schematic diagram of grid separator bar space: 13,1 5,2 0, 24 mm

Ohata et al. (2008)

marbled flounder

white-spotted conger

Page 22: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Landing size:

marbled flounder- 15cm total length, with 11~21 mm

white-spotted conger- 35cm total length, with 5~17 mm

Ohata et al. (2008)

- Selectivity of grid separator for marbled flounder Pleuronectes yokohamae plotted against a function of (body width) / (bar space) and that for white-spotted conger Conger myriaster plotted as a function of (head height) / (bar space), □: bar space 13 mm, X: bar space 15 mm ▲:bar space 20 mm, ○ : bar space 24 mm.

white.spotted conger

- Proportion retained of each bar space from the master curve. Three arrowed lines indicate the range of head height from 8 to 14 mm for white-spotted conger Conger myriasfer

A grid of 15 mm bar space reduced juvenile discards of marbled flounder by 40% and caught most of the white-spotted conger

Page 23: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Development of JET (Jellyfish excluder for Towed fishing gear)

Takayanagi (2007)

Nemopilema nomurai Bell diameter 25~106 cm

Producing area of Nemopilema nomurai

Kuroshio Current

Lee et al., (2007)

Page 24: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Jellyfish (damaging to fishery)

Distribution ratio of fish and jellyfish in survey trawl (2004~2007)

F is h5 9 . 0 %

Je lly f is h4 1 . 0 %

F i s h2 . 0 %

Je lly f is h9 8 . 0 %

F i s h3 1 . 0 %

Je lly f is h6 9 . 0 %

F i s h1 2 . 7 %

Je lly f is h8 7 . 3 %

Kim et al, 2007. The status of the development of jellyfish separator system (JSS) in Korea. The 4th International jellyfish workshop.

Page 25: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

□ Development of the JSS

Jellyfish separator system

Cod-end

Cover net

Guiding net Separator net

Outlet

Net

Cutting net

Outlet Chain

Park et al., 2010, The performance of a wedge type jellyfish excluder device inserted in a trawl net. J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 46 (4), 302-312.

Page 26: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Cod-end Cover-net Jellyfish Exclu

sion rate Catch loss rate Jellyfish (kg) Fish (kg) Jellyfish (kg) Fish (kg)

442.0 330.9 3,184.3 157 87.8% (74.0~92.7) 32.2%

Experiment Results

Park et al., 2010, The performance of a wedge type jellyfish excluder device inserted in a trawl net. J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 46 (4), 302-312.

Page 27: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Method of designing and manufacturing JET (Jellyfish excluder for Towed fishing gear) for various towed fishing gears

- Separation of Jellyfish from target species by JET.

- A part of towed fishing gear where JET is inserted.

MATSUSHITA and HONDA., 2006, Method of designing and manufacturing JET(Jellyfish Excluder for Towed fishing gear) for various towed fishing gears. Bull. Fish. Res. Agen. No. 16, 19-27.

Page 28: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Research on by-catch of shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru Sea (volume, reduction devices, and utilization of discarded by-catch)

SEAFDEC (2005)

Ari Purbayanto, Ph.D Professor in Fishing Technology Department of Fisheries Resource Utilization Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

Purbayanto (2013) Purbayanto, 2013. Research on by-catch of shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru Sea. WGFTFB 2013 meeting.

Page 29: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

•  The by-catch is still the main problem on shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru sea, Indonesia.

•  A large volume of the by-catch is discarded •  Presidential decree No. 39/1980 to ban the operation of Trawl

Net in Indonesia waters •  BED - Equipped Trawl(shrimp trawl) is permitted to be operate

d only in Arafuru sea at geograpic position of 130º E to the east •  Bycatch Excluder Device (BED) or Turtle Excluder Devices (T

ED) – must be attached on shrimp trawl net during operation

Purbayanto, 2013. Research on by-catch of shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru Sea. WGFTFB 2013 meeting.

Page 30: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Mahiswara (2004) reported that: TED super shooter decreased bycatch/towing/hour by 5% (12 cm grid space) and by 60% (4 cm grid space).

TED performance (815 shots, 3 years period)

turtle reduction 99% stingray reduction 96% large shark reduction 80% sponge reduction 80% shrimp loss 2 – 38% Source: Eayrs (2006)

Purbayanto, 2013. Research on by-catch of shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru Sea. WGFTFB 2013 meeting.

Page 31: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

(a) TED super shooter (US type) (c) Fish eye (b) Square mesh window

Kind of Bycatch Reduction Devices

Purbayanto et al. (2007)

Mesh opening 22.50mm 31.75mm

Bar distance 100mm

Height : 600mm Diameter : 450mm

Page 32: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Comparison between BRDs in reduncing by-catch

The by-catch reduction and shrimp loss of the BRDs tested compared to the control net

Percent reduction by weight US-TED Square Mesh

Window Fish Eye

By-catch reduction -(4.66)* 5.98 13.36 Shrimp loss 32.29 22.13 21.25

*) The bycatch increase compared to the control net.

Purbayanto et al. (2007)

Page 33: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

JTED bar 1.75 mm saved 33 % young fish

80 Immature and trash fish

60

67 %

40 33 %

20

0

Retained

Escaped

pen = 12 cm Widodo & Mahiswara (2007)

Purbayanto, 2013. Research on by-catch of shrimp trawl fishery in Arafuru Sea. WGFTFB 2013 meeting.

(Juvenile and Trash Excluder Device)

Page 34: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Utilization of discarded by-catch utilizing the discarded by-catch

Increasing efficency of fisheries resource utilization in order to sustain bio-diversity, environment, and food security for people prosperity

Development of environmentally

friendly fishing tech.

Target species

Fishing

By-catch

Processing technology to utilize discarded by-catch

Food industry

Surimi

Export

Food Security

People prosperity Purbayanto, 2013. Research on by-catch of shrimp tra

wl fishery in Arafuru Sea. WGFTFB 2013 meeting.

Peptone

Feed industry

Page 35: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

ICES-­‐FAO  WGFTFB  2014  -­‐  New  Bedford,  USA,  5-­‐9  May  2014  

SelecGve,  non-­‐selecGve  and  balanced  fishing  

Petri  Suuronen1,  Pingguo  He2,  Michael  Pol3,  Norman  Graham4,  and  Dave  Reid4

Mean  trophic  level  analysis    as  indicator  for  balanced  harvesGng -­‐  Cast  study  on  Japanese-­‐type  set-­‐net,

 in  Thailand •   

Takafumi    Arimoto,    U.Khrueniam,  T.Yoshikawa,  K.Kon,  Y.Okamoto,  S.Ishikawa,

 et  al.

Simplified  representaVon  of  a  trophic  pyramid  of  aquaVc  ecosystems.  In  balanced  harvest,  fishing  mortality  should  be  proporVonal  to  producVvity  across  trophic  levels  (and  producVvity  of  species).    Drawing modified from Jeppe Kolding Suuronen P. (2014)

Photo from Arimoto T. (2014)

Page 36: Review of Fishing Technology to Reduce Bycatch in Asiaseagrant.uaf.edu/events/2014/wakefield-bycatch/... · Whole Malaysia 214,980 261,670 82.16 32.49 Nuruddin & Isa (2013) MATSUOKA

Conclusions

•  Development & Application of Bycatch Reduction Methods has

been promoted in Asian Countries.

- Key factors: Selectivity, Escapement Devices

!  Reduction of Bycatch by Selective Fishing & New Approach of

Balanced Harvesting are important Factors for Sustainable

Utilization of Healthy Ecosystem