Upload
lennard-funk
View
725
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
REVERSE GEOMETRY TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY……BEYOND EXPECTATIONS?
Rachael Daw February 2014
NWULG
NWULG
AIM! To discuss current thinking on the
potential functional outcome of Reverse Geometry Total Shoulder Arthroplasty !
! To consider the implications of improved clinical outcomes for rehabilitationNW
ULG
NWULG
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE! The first TSR, a salvage procedure for TB,
was essentially a reverse geometry design!
Jules Emile Pean ,1893.
Neer’s Mark I reverse prosthesis
NWULG
NWULG
THE MODERN REVERSE TSR
Paul Grammont, 1985
“ The patient who has lost function doesn’t care about the design of the prosthesis that will be implanted but only about it’s effectiveness in the recovery of the lost function”NW
ULG
NWULG
SALVAGE PROCEDURE?! The Grammont design successfully achieves I. Improved stability II. Compensation for the absent cuff III. Reduced risk of mechanical failure ! Despite this still carries significant risks ! Boileau et al (2006), recommended that the
reverse prosthesis must be considered a salvage procedure, limited to patients over 70.
NWULG
NWULG
EXPECTED OUTCOMES! From a recent literature review the
average outcomes following primary RTSR are:
Forward Flexion -122.5◦ Abduction - 117.6◦ Ext. Rotation - 32.1◦ Constant Score - 62
NWULG
NWULG
OUR EXPERIENCEFLEXION ACHIEVED
% of patients
> 90◦ > 120◦ >150◦ELECTIVE 86 59 23TRAUMA 90 55 15
TOTAL 88 57 19
17% of the total patient cohort < 70
NWULG
NWULG
REHAB CONSIDERATIONS! Increasing number of younger patients! Increasingly active older patient population! Increasing number of patients achieving
greater ROM! Is this going to increase physicaldemand on the prosthesis beyondIts capability?!
SHOULD WE BE WORRIED?
NWULG
NWULG
BIOMECHANICS! Mahfour et al (2005) found;! RTSR experiences kinematic patterns and
torque forces most similar to the normal shoulder (compared to anatomical TSR and cuff deficient shoulders).
! Scapula rotation contributed more greatly to overall elevation
! Subjects having had either type of TSR had smaller bearing surface forces than normal or cuff deficient shoulders.
NWULG
NWULG
BIOMECHANICS! Mahnic deToledo et al (2012) found; ! No significant differences between the
scapulothoracic kinematics of anatomic or RTSR subjects.
! In general there was greater upward rotation of the scapula with loading in those with arthroplasty (opposite pattern to the normal shoulder)
! ROM analysed only up to 90◦ elevation.
NWULG
NWULG
QUESTIONS…..! Biomechanical research is insufficient and
inconclusive.! Can the modern prosthesis withstand
conditions similar to the native shoulder in the long term?
! Does rehab make a difference to outcome?! What should be the focus of rehab for the high performing patient?! Limitations?
?NWULG
NWULG
RECOMMENDED REHAB! Blacknall and Neumann (2011) ! Evaluation based rehab protocols should
consider; ! Healing times, pathophysiology, anatomy
and biomechanics ! Pre-morbid conditions ! Response to treatment ! PATIENTS ABILITIES
NWULG
NWULG
EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION! ‘Raison d’être’ for the procedure? ! FUNCTION, FUNCTION, FUNCTION! ! ↑ scapular rotation with elevation can ↑function, but failure to correct on lowering can cause ↑ prosthesis wear and notching
! Focus on quality and technique with maintenance of CONTROL throughout.
! Will control in greater ranges be sufficient to prevent excess wear?
NWULG
NWULG
REHAB RELATED RISKS! NOTCHING, ↑ with poor scapulothoracic
control, (particularly on lowering) ! DISLOCATION, ↑ HBB, combined
extension, IR and add. ! GLENOID COMPONENT LOOSENING, ↑
with lifting and weight-bearing through the upper limb
! ? Any risks associated with ↑ ROM
NWULG
NWULG
CASE STUDY! 65 year old �, left RTSR for revision of failed
hemiarthroplasty post # ! Early onset notching (grade II) noted at 2/12 ! Significant scapulothoracic hitching and reduced
glenohumeral movement also noted at consultation ! Following specialist shoulder physiotherapy to
address deltoid function and scapulothoracic control, ROM and QOM improved significantly
! No further progression of notching seen.
NWULG
NWULG
JAN 2013 FEB 2013
AUGUST 2013
NWULG
NWULG
LIMITATIONS?! Golant et al (2012) ! Little literature on sports participation
post TSR in general and no literature on sporting activity for RTSR in particular
! Survey of ASES: 36.1% allow high-load non-contact sports 72.2% allow low-load sports 17.9% allow contact sports 51.3% allow non-upper extremity sports
NWULG
NWULG
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
NWULG
NWULG
CONCLUSION! More questions than answers! ! RESEARCH IS NEEDED; ! to investigate the biomechanical
capabilities of the RTSR and ! to establish outcomes of younger pts and
those who have performed better (eg ? earlier failure)
! But……..
NWULG
NWULG
CONCLUSION! The potential number of patients in this
group remains small ! Those wanting to achieve high level
function is smaller still, so….. ! How much do we really need to worry?NW
ULG
NWULG
REFERENCES! Grammont's Idea: The Story of Paul Grammont's Functional Surgery Concept and the Development of the Reverse
Principle. Baulot E, Sirveaux F, Boileau P. Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research. 2011; 469: 2425-2431. ! Evolution of the reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Jazayeri R. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2011; 69
(1): 50-55. ! Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and
revision arthroplasty. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis A M, Hovorka I. Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 2006; 15(5):527-540.
! Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanics. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, and Balg F. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2005; 14: 147-161s.
! Kinematic and clinical evaluation of shoulder function after primary and revision reverse shoulder prostheses. D. Alta T, Bergmann JH, Jan Veeger DJ. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011; 20: 564-570.
! Kinematic evaluation of patients with total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty during rehabilitation exercises with different loads. Toledo JM,Loss JF, Janssen TW, van der Scheer JW, Alta TD, Willems WJ, Veeger DH. Clinical Biomechanics . 2012; 27 (8):793-800.
! Invivo determination of the dynamics of normal, rotator cuff-deficient, total, and reverse replacement shoulders. Mahfouz M, Nicholson G, Komistek R, Hovis D, Kubo M. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-american volume. 2005; 87A:107-113. Supplement: 2
! Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder replacement. Blacknall J, Neumann L. Shoulder & Elbow. 2011; 3(4):232-240.
! Return to sports after shoulder arthroplasty: A survey of surgeons' preferences.Golant A. Christoforou D, Zuckerman J.D, Kwon YW. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012; 21(4):554-560.
NWULG
NWULG