Upload
koen-pauwels
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
From impressions to expressions
• “A lot of us remember when the role of the CMO was much simpler. Information flowed in one direction: from companies to consumers. When we drew up our plans and budgets, the key metric was consumer impressions: how many people would see, hear or read our ad?”
Joe Tripodi, Chief Marketing and Commercial Officer, Coca-Cola, 2011
Like
TV Sales Paid
Search
Unlike
PriceDistribution
Websites Visits
Now online media even drive toilet tissue sales!
Srinivasan, Rutzand Pauwels 2015
ConsiderationInitial
Consideration Set
Moment of Decision
Loyalty Loop
Post Purchase ExperienceOngoing process
Active EvaluationInformation gathering, shopping
McKinsey 2009The Consumer Decision Journey
Has the Web made the funnel fat?
Purchase LoyaltyAwareness
And how about path from purchase?
• Prospective customer may postpone purchase because they feel overwhelmed or uncertain
• Satisfied customers unsubscribe because they feel overwhelmed by marketing/’relationship’
But do consumers really
• Switch brands near the end of the purchase process?
• Change their feelings online ?
• Have these feelings best captured by online metrics ?
It depends
So what is the evidence?1) From individual search data
2) From aggregate metrics
And what future research do we need?3) Including controlled experiments
Search for cameras (Bronnenberg et al. 2016)
• Consumer finds choice in mid to late search,stays close to mean of early search
attributes, later narrows search for each attribute.
• % of search/site visits represents % of choice• Consumer revisits the chosen product• Generic search more at start, but only 7% Branded Search more often later: up to 97%
But Search varies across categories
Cars, insurance: search starts3 months before purchase(Lecinski, Google 2011)
Groceries: search, if any, on same day as purchase
So when should paid or
owned media work best?
and Across Brands
• Ineffectiveness of paid search forHeralded as ‘Paid is dead’
• But paid and multiple touchpoints synergyshould be key for less familiar brands such
as
Explained from theory (Pauwels et al. 2016)
• Goods differ in knowledge consumers need:a) Experience good: deep, trusted info (Nelson 1974)
b) Search good: fast info by search (Erdem et al 1999)
• Low familiarity lifts need for cross-channel media:a) Tough to build brands online (Erdem 1999, Sandom 2010)
unfamiliar brands need online + offline mediab) Familiar brands leverage within-online synergies
With marketing effect implications
Experience goods
(services)
Search goods
(products)
Unfamiliar
brandElasticity: Owned > Paid
Synergy: Cross > Within-online
Synergy: Cross-channel >
Within online synergy
Familiar
brandElasticity: Owned > Paid
Synergy: Within online > Cross
Elasticity: Paid > Owned
Synergy: Within online > Cross
Our findings confirm hypotheses
• Owned > paid media if high enduring involvement (e.g. fashion, GMAT testing) but paid > owned if need only at specific time (e.g. furniture, toaster )
• Cross-channel synergy higher than within-online synergy for unfamiliar brands, within-online synergy highest for familiar brands
• Earned media highest elasticity across conditions
and give managers specific advice
Experience (Service) Search (Product)
Unfamiliar
brandOwned (and Earned) key to purchase
Spend on offline media for synergy
Owned key to Purchase
Spend on offline media for synergy
Familiar
brandOwned key to purchase
Spend within online for synergy
Paid (and Earned) key to purchase
Spend within online for synergy
Initiated by:
Content Separated
Content Integrated
Firm
Email, TV
PR, product placement
Customer
Retarget SEA
Affiliate SEO
OK, but which paid online actions?
DeHaan, Wiesel and Pauwels 2016
and differ by conditions :
• Among Content-integrated ads:Affiliate sites if high involvement (e.g. shoes, fashion, cars, alcohol)Paid search, price comparison site if high need NOW (e.g. refrigerator)
• Among Content-Separated (e.g. retargeting)When mood of website matches your offer
21
Implications for marketing?
• Positioning and targeting less important as consumers rely less on marketing.
• Let the market sort out user segments• Metrics like Customer Lifetime Value (to justify
customer acquisition costs) less useful • Instead of brand perceptions, preference,
loyalty, track online metrics (Simonson 2016)
But no perfect mindset metric:
Online metrics• Unobtrusive• At time of interest
in the category • What? Where?• Often platform-owned
Classic Surveys• Representative• At regular intervals,
providing time series• Why, to what extent?• Often Customized
MSI best paper (Pauwels and van Ewijk 2013)
1) How much do classic funnel metrics and online journey metrics explain and predict brand sales?
2) Does it differ by involvement and brand spent?3) How can managers affect metrics that matter most?
36 brands in 15 categories: durables (cars), services (internet, energy, travel, lodging, insurance), food (cheese, butter, snacks, candy, dairy, beer, soft drink) non-food (tissue, sanitary napkins) packaged goods
All variables endogenous in the Dynamic System
Accounts for short and long
term effectsVolume sales
Environment
Marketing
Price Promotion
Distribution Advertising
Classic funnel
Loyalty
Preference
Awareness
Consideration
Intention
Online Journey Owned
Paid
Earned
General Results
1) Classic funnel still matters, but online journey metrics substantially add to sales explanation
2) Classic Awareness drives search clicks and site visits, but is also driven by these online metrics
Classic ‘mid-funnel’ less effective
Awareness Consider Preference Buying intention
Loyalty0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.25%
0.30% 0.28%
0.02%
0.07%
0.20%0.17%
Consider, Preference, Buying intention and Loyalty matter less than Awareness
Consumers need to be aware, then look online!
How to read? If awareness
increases by 1%, volumes sales
increase on average by .28%
Moderators: involvement, online spent
• Online Journey metrics matter more:a) The higher category involvementb) The higher % of brand budget spent online
‘Best’ combination of classic funneland online metrics iscategory and brand specific
Integrate slow moving attitudes and fast online actions (Pauwels & van Ewijk 2013)
Web visits
KNOWCOGNITION
Aware
Consider Buy
LIKEClick
Visit
AFFECT
Prefer
Loyalty
Experience& Express
DOSearch
TV best offline action to lift online behavior, even outperforms online on pageviews & social media
Clicks
Branded search
Generic search
#Web visits
#Pageviews per visit
or
#Pos web co
nversations
#Neg web conversa
tions0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.00
.17 .17 .17.25 .19
.74
.07
.95
.71.51
.41
0
.70
.20
TV Online
How to read? If TV expenditures increase by 1%, # website visits
increase on average by .25%
Marketing effects vary by stage• Display ads in early stages funnel, search
throughout the journey (Abhishek et al. 2012)• Content-integrated ads same traffic impact as
content-separated, but much better conversion (DeHaan et al. 2016)
• TV ads lift branded search, conversion, eWOM, page views (Joo et al. 2016, Pauwels & van Ewijk 2013)
And continue to show trade-offs
• Persuasiveness drops 10% with each 1M extra views if provocative ad (Tucker 2016)
• Digital does not change “richness versus reach” tradeoff - just alters the parameters.
• There is still a role for paid media• But pointless to persuade consumers about
quality: they go to others (Simonson 2016)
Initial Consideration
SetMoment of Decision
Loyalty Loop
Post Purchase ExperienceOngoing process
Active EvaluationInformation gathering, shopping
Implying new marketing objectives
Get consumer familiar with your brand Advertising general, contextual or category-based.Incidental contacts with earned media (PR and Social)
Re-confirm purchase: listen to feedback via earned media Resist temptation to over-contact lest customer unsubscribes
Ensure you are found and respected online: when consumer drops by website, help with info access, paid ads focus on behavioral targeting
Persuade consumerWith Promo, Ads
Did funnel hips really get larger ?
• Pauwels & van Ewijk (2013), Simonson (2016) argue that mid-funnel metrics less predictive of purchase and less sensitive to marketing
• Instead the more trusted opinion of others is key and now readily available in social media
• Tested in large scale stock market study with daily mindset metrics, owned + social media
Owned media works top & bottomStock
Returns
Stock Risk
Owned
Positive WOM
Advocacy
Intent
Aware
Negative WOM
Colicev, Malshe and Pauwels, Revising for JM
Why do we need experiments?
• Self-selection bias: it’s not just that consumers have to click on a search or display ad, they also have to visit the website displaying the ad
• Context matters: on which site, device, where with which creative, extent of exposure, …
• Personalization technologies allow us to show multiple messages, and then choose best one
Consumer behavior changes online
• Going from more to less mobile device (phone to PC) doubles conversion (DeHaan et al. 2015)
• Talking about purchase on social media increases store traffic (Pauwels et al. 2016)
• Social media critics buy more (Weiger et al. 2016)
• Touching product on device feels like owning it
Touching feels like ownership
Touchscreen devices give this touch (Basel 2016)So Focus decision on concrete product attributes
For fast moving goods, interface touch suffices
Future research needed on
• Mapping of classic to online metrics
• Under which conditions do consumers change thoughts, feelings and decisions online ?
• What are the implications for consumers, for managers and for society ?
• Contact me at [email protected]• LinkedIn/Twitter handle: koenhpauwels• My blog: https://analyticdashboards.wordpress.com• Professional Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Smarter-Marketing-with-Analytics-Dashboards/586717581359393
• And check out my practical book:It’s not the Size of the Data, it is How You Use it:Smarter Marketing with Analytics & Dashboards
Want to learn more?