Upload
ekos
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 1/24
STRUCTURAL CALCULATION
OFINVERTED T-SHAPE TYPE RETAINING WALL
CHECK STABILITY
INPUT DATA
REINFORCEMENT BAR
PRINT EXIT
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 2/24
concrete = 45 x 900,000 = 40,443,750 42%
reinforcement = 1,537 x 18,000 = 27,661,660 29%
bekisting = 27,661,660 29%
Rp 95,767,071 ,- /m' #NAME?
reinforcement = 34 kg/m3-concrete
ber_lapar2_lah maka engkau akan dapat melihat_KU
fokuskan hidup_mu hanya untuk ber_ibadah kepada_KU,
maka engkau akan sampai kepada_KU !!!
tak mungkin cinta kepada_KU dan cinta kepada dunia,
bersanding dalam satu hati.
( Hadist Qudsi )
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 3/24
0.00 0.00
0.00 1.50
1.00 2.50
1.00 13.75
2.00 13.75
3.50 2.50
12.00 1.50
12.00 0.00
1 0.00 0.00
1 0.00 3.00
2 1.00 3.00
1 1.00 8.25
2 12.00 8.25
1 0.00 7.25
2 1.00 7.25
U ssu temporary baja
22 2,200 1,250 1,800 polos lunak 1,276
24 2,400 1,400 2,000 polos lunak 1,392
32 3,200 1,850 2,650 deform sedang 1,856
39 3,900 2,250 3,200 deform keras 2,262
48 4,800 2,750 4,000 deform keras 2,784
ssa = 0.58 ssu
ssa
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 4/24
Location : Randangan
Top wall level = m
- o am a River bed level = mGround water level = m
River water level = m
Foundation level = m
Dimension (unit le
H = m B = m L =
a
b11 = m b12 = m b13 =
b21 = m b22 = m b23 =
h1 = m h31 = m h32 =
h4 = m hw1 = m hw2 =
Live load, q = t/m2 Kh =Backfill soil gc = t/m gw =
gsoil = t/m
gsat = t/m a =o
(for stability analy
f =o
a =o
(for structural ana
c = t/m2
b =o
Foundation soilgs' = t/m Safety factor (normal) (seis
fB =o
Overturning |e| <
cB = t/m Sliding fs >
Friction coefficient Reaction of foundation soil
m = qmax >
Uplift coefficient Allowable stress
Um = ompress ve sca =Cover of bar Tensile ssa =
Wall Shear ta =
d back = cm Young's modulus ratio
d front = cm
Footingd upper = cm
d lower = cm
12.00
-1.25
0.40
25.0
8.50
13.75
Section of Retaining wall
3.00
1
7
10
8.2
B/3=
1.00
qa=qu/3 qae=
1.2
0.50
10
10
1850
5.5
24
1.00
30.0
0.00
1.80
927
0.00
2.00
7.60
1.30
60
1.0
1.0
2.50
1.50
1.0
2.00
B/6=2.29
0.50
1.00
8.25
12.50
1.757.00
6.00
13.75
1.0
1.50 0.0
2.40
7.2
0.2
b12
H=h1
h31
b21 b23
q (t/m2)
h4
b11 b13
b22
h32
hw1
hw2
B
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 5/24
STABILITY : D4 - Kolam Olak
Normal Condition Seismic Condition
a) Stability against overturning a) Stability against overturning
|e| = m < B/6 = m OK! |e| = m < B/3 = m OK!
b) Stability against sliding b) Stability against sliding
Fs = < Check! Fs = < Check!
c) Reaction of foundation soil c) Reaction of foundation soil
q1 = t/m2
< qa = t/m2
OK! q1 = t/m2
< qae = t/m2
OK!
q2 = t/m < qa = t/m OK! q2 = t/m < qae = t/m OK!
1.13 2.00 1.82 4.00
16.84 63.00 9.86
1.08 1.25
94.50
36.24 63.00 42.38 94.50
1.88 2.00
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 6/24
Stressing of Reinforcement and Concrete
Name of Structure :
Location :
Normal Condition Allowable compressive stress (sca) = kg/cm
Allowable tensile stress (ssa) = kg/cm
Allowable shearing stress (ta) = kg/cm
Young's modulus ratio =
Item
b (cm)
h (cm)
d1 (cm) back back
d2 (cm) front front
d (cm)
M (ton m)
S (ton)
Bar size and spacing (mm)
Bar (As1) D 25 - D 22 - D 25 -
Bar (As2) D 25 - D 25 - D 25 -
Stress sc OK! OK!
Stress ss OK! NO!
Stress t OK! OK!
Seismic Condition Allowable compressive stress (sca) = kg/cm
Allowable tensile stress (ssa) = kg/cm
Allowable shearing stress (ta) = kg/cm
Young's modulus ratio =
Item
b (cm)h (cm)
d1 (cm)
d2 (cm)
d (cm)
M (ton m)
S (ton)
Bar size and spacing (mm)
Bar (As1) D 25 - D 22 - D 25 -
Bar (As2) D 25 - D 25 - D 25 -
Stress sc OK! OK!
Stress ss OK! NO!
Stress t OK! OK!1.15 3.09 1.51
0.69 1.89 1.28
2775
Section A-A Section B-B Sectio
100.0
173.3
7.0
250
7.0
5.5
24
60
1850
100.0
250.0
10.0
166.3
22
11
125
D4 - Kolam Olak
Randangan
10.0
100.0
250.0
10.0
10.0
240.0
16
31
90
243.0
179
46
120
Section of Retaining wall
30 3
371 3532514
250
6
100.0 100.0 100.0
8.25
16
Section A-A Section B-B Sectio
7.0 7.0 10.0
173.3 250.0 250.0
166.3 243.0 240.0
10.0 10.0 10.0
19 75 36
37 302 19
Section of Retaining wall 250 250
125 120
12 59 5
624 4182 414
D C
BB
A A
CD
D C
BB
A A
CD
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 7/24
St
1. Design Data
1.1 Dimensions
B = 12.00 m H = 13.75 m
L = 1.00 m (unit length)
b11 = 1.50 m b21 = 8.50 m
b12 = 1.00 m b22 = 2.50 m
b13 = 0.00 m b23 = 1.00 m
h1 = 13.75 m h4 = 3.00 m
h31 = 1.50 m hw1 = 8.25 m
h32 = 1.00 m hw2 = 7.25 m
1.2 Parameters
q = 0.50 t/m2
(for normal condition)
= 0.00 t/m2
(for seismic condition) Section of Retaining Wall
gc = 2.40 t/m
gw = 1.00 t/m
Backfill soil Foundation soil Safety factor
gsoil = 1.80 t/m gs' = 1.00 t/m (=gsat-gw) Overturning
gsat = 2.00 t/m cB = 0.00 t/m normal |e|<B/6=2.00m
c = 0.00 t/m fB = 30.00o
seismic |e|<B/3=4.00m
f = 25.00o
m = 0.50 (Friction coefficient) Sliding
Um = 1.00 (Uplift coefficient) normal fs > 2.00
b = 0.400o
seismic fs > 1.25
a = 1.300o
(for stability analysis) Reaction of foundation soil
= 7.595o
(for structural analysis) normal qmax<qa
d = 0.400o
(for stability analysis in normal condition, d = b) qa=qu/3
= 16.67o (for structural analysis in normal condition, d = 2/3 f) seismic qmax<qae
= 21.79o
(for stability analysis in seismic condition, see Section 2.3) qae=qu/2
= 12.50o (for structural analysis in seismic condition, d = 1/2 f)
F = 11.310o
( = Arc tan(Kh) ) Kh = 0.20
2. Stability Calculation
2.1 Case 1 (Normal condition, with vertical live load)
1.50
q = 0.50 t/m2
1.00
0.00
13.75 11.25
1.00
8.25
3.00 7.25
1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00
Acting Load in Case 1
q (t/m2)b12
b2 b2 b23
hw1
H=h1
h31
b11 b13
h32 h4
hw2
B
Pw1 Pa4
Pa2
Pa1
qa2
qa3qw1 qa4
Pa3
O
Pp1
qa1
qp1
7
1
10
12
9
2 3
5
6
8
4
11
Pw2
qw2qu2
Pu1Pu2
qu1
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 8/24
Stability
(1) Vertical Load
No. Description W X W x X
1 1.50 x 8.50 x 2.40 30.600 7.750 237.15
2 2.50 x 2.50 x 2.40 15.000 2.250 33.75
3 1.50 x 1.00 x 2.40 3.600 0.500 1.80
4 0.50 x 1.00 x 8.50 x 2.40 10.200 6.333 64.60
5 0.50 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 2.40 1.200 0.333 0.40
6 0.50 x 11.25 x 1.50 x 2.40 20.250 3.000 60.75
7 11.25 x 1.00 x 2.40 27.000 1.500 40.50
8 0.50 x 11.25 x 0.00 x 2.40 0.000 1.000 0.009 0.50 x 11.25 x 1.50 x 1.80 15.188 3.000 45.56
10 8.50 x 5.50 x 1.80 84.150 7.750 652.16
11 8.50 x 5.75 x 2.00 97.750 7.750 757.56
12 0.50 x 8.50 x 1.00 x 2.00 8.500 9.167 77.92
q 0.50 x 10.00 5.000 7.000 35.00
T o t a l(1 to q) 318.438 2,007.15
Pu1 8.25 x 12.00 x 0.50 x -1.00 -49.500 8.000 -396.00
Pu2 7.25 x 12.00 x 0.50 x -1.00 -43.500 4.000 -174.00
Total ( 1 to Pu2) 225.438 1,437.15
(2) Horizontal Load
Coefficient of Active earth pressure
Ka =
(for stability analysis)
a = 1.300o
d = 0.400o
Cos2(f -a) = 0.838 Sin(f+d) = 0.429
Cos2a = 0.999 Sinf = 0.423
Cos(a+d) = 1.000 Cosa = 1.000
Ka = 0.413 for stability analysis
(for structural analysis)
a = 7.595o
d = 16.667o
Cos2
(f -a) = 0.911 Sin(f+d) = 0.665Cos
2a = 0.983 Sinf = 0.423
Cos(a+d) = 0.912 Cosa = 0.991
Ka' = 0.419 for structural analysis
Coefficient of Passive earth pressure
Kp =
a = 1.300o
d = 0.400o
Cos2(f+a) = 0.804 Sin(f+d) = 0.429
Cos2a = 0.999 Sinf = 0.423
Cos(a -d) = 1.000 Cosa = 1.000
Kp = 2.443
qa1 = Ka x q = 0.206 ton/m
qa2 = Ka x (h1- hw1) x gsoil = 4.084 ton/m
qa3 = qa1 + qa2 = 4.290 ton/m
qa4 = Ka x hw1 x (gsat - gw) = 3.403 ton/m
qw 1 = hw1 x gw = 8.250 ton/m
qw 2 = hw2 x gw = 7.250 ton/m
qp1 = Kp x h4 x (gsat - gw) = 7.328 ton/m
2
Cos2(f -a)
Cos2a x Cos(a+d) x 1+Sin(f+d) x Sinf
Cos(a+d) x Cosa
2
Cos2(f+a)
Cos2a x Cos(a -d) x 1 -Sin(f+d) x Sinf
Cos(a -d) x Cosa
161204550 l ffi 7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 9/24
Stability9/
No. Description H Y H x Y
Pa1 0.206 x 5.50 1.134 11.000 12.48
Pa2 4.084 x 5.50 x 0.50 11.231 10.083 113.24
Pa3 4.290 x 8.25 35.394 4.125 146.00
Pa4 3.403 x 8.25 x 0.50 14.039 2.750 38.61
Pw1 8.250 x 8.25 x 0.50 34.031 2.750 93.59
Pw2 -7.250 x 7.25 x 0.50 -26.281 2.417 -63.51
Pp1 -7.328 x 3.00 x 0.50 -10.992 1.000 -10.99
T o t a l 58.557 329.41
(3) Stability Calculation
a) Stability against overturning
a) -1 Without Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 2,007.15 - 329.41
X = = = 5.269 m
S W 318.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 5.269 = 0.731 m < B/6 = 2.000 m OK !
2 2
a) -2 With Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 1,437.15 - 329.41X = = = 4.914 m
S W 225.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 4.914 = 1.086 m < B/6 = 2.000 m OK !
2 2
b) Stability against sliding
b)-1 Without Uplift
Sliding force : S H = 58.557 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 318.438 = 159.219 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.50 )
HR 159.219
Fs = = = 2.719 > 2.00 OK !S H 58.557
b)-2 With Uplift
Sliding force : S H = 58.557 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 225.438 = 112.719 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.5 )
HR 112.719
Fs = = = 1.925 < 2.00 Check !
S H 58.557
c) Reaction of foundation soil
S W 6 x e
q1,2 = x (1 + )
B B
318.438 6 x 0.731
q1 = x (1 + ) = 36.236 t/m2
< qa = 63.000 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
318.438 6 x 0.731
q2 = x (1 - ) = 16.837 t/m2
< qa = 63.000 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
16.837 t/m2
- t/m2
36.236 t/m2
- t/m2
in case, e > 0 in case, e < 0
(applicable) (not applicable)
Reaction of Foundation Soil in Case 1
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 10/24
Stabil
2.2 Case 2 (Normal condition, without vertical live load)
1.50
q = 0.50 t/m2
1.00
0.00
13.75 11.25
1.00
8.25
3.00 7.25
1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00
Acting Load in Case 2
(1) Vertical Load
No. Description W X W x X
1 1.50 x 8.50 x 2.40 30.600 7.750 237.152 2.50 x 2.50 x 2.40 15.000 2.250 33.75
3 1.50 x 1.00 x 2.40 3.600 0.500 1.80
4 0.50 x 1.00 x 8.50 x 2.40 10.200 6.333 64.60
5 0.50 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 2.40 1.200 0.333 0.40
6 0.50 x 11.25 x 1.50 x 2.40 20.250 3.000 60.75
7 11.25 x 1.00 x 2.40 27.000 1.500 40.50
8 0.50 x 11.25 x 0.00 x 2.40 0.000 1.000 0.00
9 0.50 x 11.25 x 1.50 x 1.80 15.188 3.000 45.56
10 8.50 x 5.50 x 1.80 84.150 7.750 652.16
11 8.50 x 5.75 x 2.00 97.750 7.750 757.56
12 0.50 x 8.50 x 1.00 x 2.00 8.500 9.167 77.92
T o t a l (1 to 12) 313.438 1972.15
Pu1 8.25 x 12.00 x 0.50 x -1.00 -49.500 8.000 -396.00
Pu2 7.25 x 12.00 x 0.50 x -1.00 -43.500 4.000 -174.00
Total ( 1 to Pu2) 220.438 1402.15
(2) Horizontal Load
Coefficient of Active earth pressure
Ka = 0.413 (for stability analysis)
Ka ' = 0.419 (for structural analysis)
Coefficient of Passive earth pressure
Kp = 2.443
qa1 = Ka x q = 0.206 ton/m
qa2 = Ka x (h1- hw1) x gsoil = 4.084 ton/m
qa3 = qa1 + qa2 = 4.290 ton/mqa4 = Ka x hw1 x (gsat - gw) = 3.403 ton/m
qw 1 = hw1 x gw = 8.250 ton/m
qw2 = hw2 x gw = 7.250 ton/m
qp1 = Kp x h4 x (gsat - gw) = 7.328 ton/m
No. Description H Y H x Y
Pa1 0.206 x 5.50 1.134 11.000 12.48
Pa2 4.084 x 5.50 x 0.50 11.231 10.083 113.24
Pa3 4.290 x 8.25 35.394 4.125 146.00
Pa4 3.403 x 8.25 x 0.50 14.039 2.750 38.61
Pw1 8.250 x 8.25 x 0.50 34.031 2.750 93.59
Pw2 -7.250 x 7.25 x 0.50 -26.281 2.417 -63.51
Pp1 -7.328 x 3.00 x 0.50 -10.992 1.000 -10.99
T o t a l 58.557 329.41
Pw1 Pa4
Pa2
Pa1
qa2
qa3qw1 qa4
Pa3
O
9
Pp1
qa1
qp1
7
1
10
12
2 3
5
8
4
11
Pw2
qw2qu2 Pu2
qu1
Pu1
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 11/24
Stability11/
(3) Stability Calculation
a) Stability against overturning
a)-1 Without Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 1,972.15 - 329.41
X = = = 5.241 m
S W 313.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 5.241 = 0.759 m < B/6 = 2.000 m OK !
2 2
a)-2 With Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 1,402.15 - 329.41
X = = = 4.866 m
S W 220.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 4.866 = 1.134 m < B/6 = 2.000 m OK !
2 2
b) Stability against sliding
b)-1 without Uplift Pressure
Sliding force : S H = 58.557 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 313.438 = 156.719 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.5 )
HR 156.719
Fs = = = 2.68 > 2.00 OK !
S H 58.557
b)-2 with Uplift Pressure
Sliding force : S H = 58.557 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 220.438 = 110.219 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.5 )
HR 110.219
Fs = = = 1.88 < 2.00 Check !
S H 58.557
c) Reaction of foundation soil
S W 6 x e
q1,2 = x (1 + )
B B
313.438 6 x 0.759
q1 = x (1 + ) = 36.032 t/m2
< qa = 63.000 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
313.438 6 x 0.759
q2 = x (1 - ) = 16.207 t/m2
< qa = 63.000 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
16.207 t/m2
- t/m2
36.032 t/m2
- t/m2
in case, e > 0 in case, e < 0
(applicable) (not applicable)
Reaction of Foundation Soil in Case 2
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 12/24
Stab
2.3 Case 3 (Seismic condition)
1.50
1.00
0.00
13.75 11.25
1.00
8.25
3.00 7.25
1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00
Acting Load in Case 3
(1) Vertical Load = Same as Case 2
(2) Horizontal Load
f = 25.00o
a = 1.300o
(for stability analysis) F = 11.310o
b = 0.40o
a = 7.595o
(for structural analysis) (F = Arc tan(Kh) )
q = 0.00 t/m2
(for seismic condition) Kh = 0.20
Coefficient of Active earth pressure
Kae =
(for stability analysis)
a = 0.000 o d = 21.79 o
tan d = Sin f Sin ( F + D - b )
1 - Sin f Cos ( F + D - b )
sin D= Sin ( F + b )
Sin f
Sin (F+ b ) = 0.203 Sin f = 0.423
Sin D = 0.480 then D = 28.69
Sin(F+D-b) = 0.637 Cos(F+D-b)= 0.771
tan d = 0.400
Cos2(f-F-a)= 0.944 Sin(f+d) = 0.729
CosF = 0.981 Sin(f-b-F) = 0.230
Cos2a = 1.000 Cos(a-b) = 1.000
Cos(a+d+F = 0.838
Kae = 0.548 (for stability analysis)
(for structural analysis)
a = 7.595o
d = 12.50o
Cos2(f-F-a)= 0.989 Sin(f+d) = 0.609
CosF = 0.981 Sin(f-b-F) = 0.230
Cos2a = 0.983 Cos(a-b) = 0.990
Cos(a+d+F)= 0.854
2
Cos2(f-F-a)
CosF x Cos2a x Cos(a+d+F) x 1+Sin(f+d) x Sin(f-b-F)
Cos(a+d+F) x Cos(a-b)
Pa1
qa1
qa2qa3qw1
Pa2
Pa3Pw1
O
7
1
10
12
9
2 3
5
6
8
4
11
Pw2
qw2
Pp1
qp1Pu1
qu2 Pu2qu1
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 13/24
Stability13
Kae = 0.607 (for structural analysis)
Coefficient of Passive earth pressure
Kpe =
a = 0.000o
d = 21.79o
Cos2(f-F+a)= 0.944 Sin(f-d) = 0.056
CosF = 0.981 Sin(f+b-F) = 0.243
Cos2a = 1.000 Cos(a-b) = 1.000
Cos(a+d-F)= 0.983
Kpe = 1.257
qa1 = Kae x ( h1 - hw1) x gsoil = 5.425 ton/m
qa2 = qa2 = 5.425 ton/m
qa3 = Kae x hw1 x (gsat - gw) = 4.521 ton/m
qw 1 = hw1 x gw = 8.250 ton/m
qw 2 = hw2 x gw = 7.250 ton/m
qp1 = Kp x h4 x (gsat - gw) = 3.771 ton/m
No. Description H Y H x Y
1 0.20 x 30.60 6.120 0.750 4.59
2 0.20 x 15.00 3.000 1.250 3.75
3 0.20 x 3.60 0.720 0.750 0.54
4 0.20 x 10.20 2.040 1.833 3.74
5 0.20 x 1.20 0.240 1.833 0.44
6 0.20 x 20.25 4.050 6.250 25.31
7 0.20 x 27.00 5.400 8.125 43.88
8 0.20 x 0.00 0.000 6.250 0.00
Pw1 0.50 x 8.25 x 8.25 34.031 2.750 93.59
Pw2 0.50 x -7.25 x 7.25 -26.281 2.417 -63.51
Pa1 0.50 x 5.43 x 5.50 14.919 10.083 150.44
pa2 5.43 x 8.25 44.758 4.125 184.63
Pa3 0.50 x 4.521 x 8.25 18.649 2.750 51.29
Pp1 -3.771 x 3.00 x 0.50 -5.657 3.000 -16.97T o t a l 101.990 481.70
(3) Stability Calculation
a) Stability against overturning
a)-1 Without Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 1,972.15 - 481.70
X = = = 4.755 m
S W 313.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 4.755 = 1.245 m < B/3 = 4.000 m OK !
2 2
a)-2 With Uplift
B = 12.00 m
S W x X - S H x Y 1,402.15 - 481.70
X = = = 4.176 m
S W 220.438
B 12.00
e = - X = - 4.176 = 1.824 m < B/3 = 4.000 m OK !
2 2
2
Cos2(f-F+a)
CosF x Cos2a x Cos(a+d-F) x 1-Sin(f-d) x Sin(f+b-F)
Cos(a+d-F) x Cos(a-b)
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 14/24
Stability14
b) Stability against sliding
b)-1 Without Uplift
Sliding force : S H = 101.990 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 313.438 = 156.719 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.50 )
HR 156.719
Fs = = = 1.54 > 1.25 OK !
S H 101.990
b)-2 With UpliftSliding force : S H = 101.990 ton
Resistance : HR = m x S W = 0.50 x 220.438 = 110.219 ton
(friction coefficient : m = 0.50 )
HR 110.219
Fs = = = 1.08 < 1.25 Check !
S H 101.990
c) Reaction of foundation soil
c-1) in case, |e| < B/6 (applicable)
S W 6 x e
q1,2 = x (1 + )
B B
313.438 6 x 1.245
q1 = x (1 + ) = 42.379 t/m2
< qae = 94.500 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
313.438 6 x 1.245
q2 = x (1 - ) = 9.860 t/m2
< qae = 94.500 t/m2
OK !
12.00 12.00
c-2) in case, B/6 < |e| < B/3 (not applicable)
2 x S W
q1' = = = - t/m2
qae = - t/m2
3 x (B/2-|e|)
9.860 t/m2
42.379 t/m2
- t/m2
in case, e > 0 and e < B/6 in case, e > 0 and B/6 < e < B/3
(applicable) (not applicable)
- t/m2
- t/m2
- t/m2
in case, e < 0 and |e| < B/6 in case, e < 0 and B/6 < |e| < B/3
(not applicable) (not applicable)
Reaction of Foundation Soil in Case 3
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 15/24
Stability15
2.4 Bearing Capacity of soil
(1) Design Data
fB = 30.00o cB = 0.00 t/m gs' = 1.00 t/m (=gsat-gw)
B = 12.00 m z = 3.00 m L = 1.00 m (unit length)
(2) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of soil, (qu)
Calculation of ultimate bearing capacity will be obtained by applying the following
Terzaghi's formula :
qu = (a x c x Nc) + (gsoil' x z x Nq) + (b x gsoil x B x Ng)
Shape factor (Table 2.5 of KP-06)
a = 1.00 b = 0.50
Shape of footing : 1 (strip)
Shape of footing a b
1 strip 1.00 0.50
2 square 1.30 0.40
3 rectangular, B x L 1.11 0.40
(B < L) (= 1.09 + 0.21 B/L)
(B > L) (= 1.09 + 0.21 L/B)
4 circular, diameter = B 1.30 0.30
Bearing capacity factor (Figure 2.3 of KP-06, by Capper)
Nc = 36.0 Nq = 23.0 Ng = 20.0
f Nc Nq Ng
0 5.7 0.0 0.0
5 7.0 1.4 0.0
10 9.0 2.7 0.2
15 12.0 4.5 2.3
20 17.0 7.5 4.7
25 24.0 13.0 9.5
30 36.0 23.0 20.0
35 57.0 44.0 41.0
37 70.0 50.0 55.0
39 > 82.0 50.0 73.0
(a x c x Nc) = 0.000
(gsoil x z x Nq) = 69.000
(b x gsoil x B x Ng) = 120.000
qu = 189.000 t/m2
(3) Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil, (qa)
qa = qu / 3 = 63.000 t/m2
(safety factor = 3 , normal condition) N= 151
qae = qu / 2 = 94.500 t/m2
(safety factor = 2 , seismic condition)
161204550.xls.ms office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 16/24
Structur
3. Structure Calculation
3.1 Normal Condition
(1) Wall 1.50
q = 0.50 t/m2
1.00
0.00
11.25
5.75 4.75
1.00
1.50 1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00
Load Diagram on Wall in Normal Condition
Ka = 0.419
a = 7.595o
d = 16.67o
cos (a+d) = 0.912
Kha = Ka x cos (a+d) = 0.382
a) Section A - A
h = 5.50 m
qa1 = Kha x q = 0.191 ton/m
qa2 = Kha x h x gsoil = 3.779 ton/m
No. Description Ha Y (from A-A) Ha x Y
Pa1 0.191 x 5.50 1.050 2.750 2.887
Pa2 3.779 x 5.50 x 0.50 10.392 1.833 19.052
T o t a l 11.442 21.939
Sa = 11.442 ton Ma = 21.939 ton m
b) Section B - B
h = 5.50 m hw1 = 5.75 m hw2 = 4.75 m
qa1 = Kha x q = 0.191 ton/m
qa2 = Kha x h x gsoil = 3.779 ton/m
qa3 = qa1 + qa2 = 3.970 ton/m
qa4 = Kha x hw2 x (gsat - gw) = 2.195 ton/m
qw1 = hw1 x gw = 5.750 ton/m
qw2 = hw2 x gw = 4.750 ton/m
No. Description Hb Y (from B-B) Ha x Y
Pa1 0.191 x 5.50 1.050 8.500 8.923
Pa2 3.779 x 5.50 x 0.50 10.392 7.583 78.807
Pa3 3.970 x 5.75 22.827 2.875 65.626
Pa4 2.195 x 5.75 x 0.50 6.310 1.917 12.095
Pw1 5.750 x 5.75 x 0.50 16.531 1.917 31.685
Pw2 -4.750 x 4.75 x 0.50 -11.281 1.583 (17.862)
T o t a l 45.829 179.274
Sb = 45.829 ton Mb = 179.274 ton m
qa1
qa4 qa3qw1
Pw1 Pa4
Pa2
Pa1
qa2
Pa3 B
A
B
A
Pw2
qw2
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 17/24
Stru
(2) Footing
Case 1 (with vertical live load) Case 2 (without vertical live load)
q = 0.50 t/m2
q = 0.50 t/m2
5.50 5.50
5.75 5.75
1.00 1.00
1.50 1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00 8.50 2.50 1.00
in case, e > 0 in case, e > 0
16.837 t/m2
16.207 t/m2
30.578 t/m2
30.250 t/m2
34.619 t/m2
34.380 t/m2
36.236 t/m2
36.032 t/m2
in case, e < 0 in case, e < 0
- t/m2- t/m2
- t/m2-
- t/m2
- t/m2
- t/m2
-
Load Diagram on Footing in Normal Case
a) Section C - C
Case 1 (with vertical live load)
No. Description Hc X (from C-C) Hc x X
1 1.500 x 1.00 x 2.40 3.600 0.500 1.800
1.000 x 1.00 x 2.40 x 0.50 1.200 0.333 0.400
2 -34.619 x 1.00 -34.619 0.500 -17.310
-1.617 x 1.00 x 0.50 -0.808 0.667 -0.539
T o t a l -30.628 -15.649
Case 2 (without vertical live load)
No. Description Hc X (from C-C) Hc x X
1 1.500 x 1.00 x 2.40 3.600 0.500 1.800
1.000 x 1.00 x 2.40 x 0.50 1.200 0.333 0.400
2 -34.380 x 1.00 -34.380 0.500 -17.190
-1.652 x 1.00 x 0.50 -0.826 0.667 -0.551
T o t a l -30.406 -15.541
Case 1 Sc = -30.628 ton Mc = -15.649 ton m
Case 2 Sc = -30.406 ton Mc = -15.541 ton m
1
1
C
C
D
D
4
3
26
1
C
C
D
D
3
4
3 1 3
4
5
4
62 2
6
26
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 18/24
Structure
b) Section D - D
Case 1 (with vertical live load)
No. Description Hd X (from D-D) Hd x Y
3 1.500 x 8.50 x 2.40 30.600 4.250 130.050
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.40 x 0.50 10.200 2.833 28.900
4 5.500 x 8.50 x 1.80 84.150 4.250 357.638
5.750 x 8.50 x 2.00 97.750 4.250 415.438
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.00 x 0.50 8.500 5.667 48.167
5 0.500 x 8.50 4.250 4.250 18.063
6 -16.837 x 8.50 -143.115 4.250 -608.237
-13.741 x 8.50 x 0.50 -58.399 2.833 -165.464
T o t a l 33.936 224.554
Case 2 (without vertical live load)
No. Description Hd X (from D-D) Hd x Y
3 1.500 x 8.50 x 2.40 30.600 4.250 130.050
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.40 x 0.50 10.200 2.833 28.900
4 5.500 x 8.50 x 1.80 84.150 4.250 357.638
5.750 x 8.50 x 2.00 97.750 4.250 415.438
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.00 x 0.50 8.500 5.667 48.167
6 -16.207 x 8.50 -137.760 4.250 -585.478
-14.043 x 8.50 x 0.50 -59.682 2.833 -169.098
T o t a l 33.759 225.616
Case 1 Sd = 33.936 ton Md = 224.554 ton m
case 2 Sd = 33.759 ton Md = 225.616 ton m
3.2 Seismic Condition
(1) Wall 1.50
1.00
0.00
11.2512.25
5.75 4.75
1.00
1.50 1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00
Load diagram on Wall for Seismic case
Kae = 0.607
a = 7.595o
d = 12.50o
cos (a+d) = 0.939Khea = Kae x cos (a+d) = 0.570 Kh = 0.20
a) Section A - A
h = 5.50 m
qa1 = Khae x h x gsoil = 5.643 t/m
No. Description Hae Y (from A-A) Hae x Y
1 0.500 x 5.500 x 0.733 x 2.400 x 0.200 0.968 1.833 1.775
2 5.500 x 1.000 x 2.400 x 0.200 2.640 2.750 7.260
3 0.500 x 5.500 x 0.000 x 2.400 x 0.200 0.000 1.833 0.000
Pa1 5.643 x 5.500 x 0.500 15.520 1.833 28.453
T o t a l 19.128 37.487
Sae = 19.128 ton Mae = 37.487 ton mb) Section B - B
2
Pa2
Pa1
qa2
qa1
qa3
Pa3
A A
B B
1 3
Pw1 Pw2
qw2qw1
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 19/24
Stru
h = 5.50 m hw1 = 5.75 m hw2 = 4.75 m
qa1 = Khae x h x gsoil = 6.009 t/m
qa2 = qa1 = 6.009 t/m
qa3 = Khae x hw1 x ( gsat - gw) = 3.278 t/m
qw1 = hw1 x gw = 5.750 ton/m
qw2 = hw2 x gw = 4.750 ton/m
No. Description Hbe Y (from B-B) Hbe x Y
Pa1 6.009 x 5.50 x 0.50 16.526 7.583 125.319
Pa2 6.009 x 5.75 34.553 2.875 99.341
Pa3 3.278 x 5.75 x 0.50 9.424 1.917 18.062
Pw1 5.750 x 5.75 x 0.50 16.531 1.917 31.685
Pw2 -4.750 x 4.75 x 0.50 -11.281 1.583 -17.862
1 0.500 x 11.25 x 1.50 x 2.40 x 0.20 4.050 3.750 15.188
2 11.250 x 1.00 x 2.40 x 0.20 5.400 5.625 30.375
3 0.500 x 11.25 x 0.00 x 2.40 x 0.20 0.000 3.750 0.000
T o t a l 75.203 302.108
Sbe = 75.203 ton Mbe = 302.108 ton m
(2) Footingin case, e < B/6 in case, B/6 < e < B/3
5.50 5.50
5.75 5.75
1.00 1.00
1.50 1.50
8.50 2.50 1.00 8.50 2.50 1.00
in case, e > 0 ande < B/6 in case, e > 0 and B/6 < e < B/3
9.860 t/m2
- t/m2
32.894 t/m2
39.669 t/m2
- t/m2
42.379 t/m2
- t/m2
in case, e < 0 and |e| < B/6 in case, e < 0 and B/6 < |e| < B/3
- t/m2
- t/m2
- t/m2
-
- t/m2
- t/m2
- t/m2
Load Diagram on Footing in Seismic Case
D
1
1
C
C
D
D
2
4
5
3 1
C
C
D
D
2
3
4
3 1 3
4 4
6
62
2
6
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 20/24
Structure20/
a) Section C - C
No. Description Hce X (from C-C) Hce x X
1 1.500 x 1.00 x 2.40 3.600 0.500 1.800
1.000 x 1.00 x 2.40 x 0.50 1.200 0.333 0.400
2 -39.669 x 1.00 -39.669 0.500 -19.835
-2.710 x 1.00 x 0.50 -1.355 0.667 -0.903
T o t a l -36.224 -18.538
Sce = -36.224 ton Mce = -18.538 ton m
b) Section D - D
No. Description Hde X (from D-D) Hde x X
3 1.500 x 8.50 x 2.40 30.600 4.250 130.050
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.40 x 0.50 10.200 2.833 28.900
4 11.250 x 8.50 x 1.90 181.900 4.250 773.075
1.000 x 8.50 x 2.00 x 0.50 8.500 5.667 48.167
5 -9.860 x 8.50 -83.810 4.250 -356.193
-23.034 x 8.50 x 0.50 -97.896 2.833 -277.371
T o t a l 49.494 346.628
Sde = 49.494 ton Mde = 346.628 ton m
3.3 Design Bending Moment and Shear Force
(1) Bending moment and shear force in each case
Description Bending Moment Shear Force
Normal Seismic Normal Seismic
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
Section A - A 21.939 21.939 37.487 11.442 11.442 19.128
Section B - B 179.274 179.274 302.108 45.829 45.829 75.203
Section C - C 15.649 15.541 18.538 30.628 30.406 36.224
Section D - D 224.554 225.616 346.628 33.936 33.759 49.494
(2) Design bending moment and shear force
Description Bending Moment Shear Force
Normal Seismic Normal Seismic
Section A - A 21.939 37.487 11.442 19.128
Section B - B 179.274 302.108 45.829 75.203
Section C - C 15.649 18.538 30.628 36.224
Section D - D 179.274 302.108 33.936 49.494
Notes: - Moment at Section C-C < Moment at Section B-B
- Moment at Section D-D < Moment at Section B-B
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 21/24
Reinforcement Bar Arrangement and Stress
Normal ConditionName of Structure : D4 - Kolam Olak
Location : Randangan
Wall (upper) Wall (lower) Footing (toe)
Section A-A Section B-B Section C-C
back front back front lower upper
Bending moment M kgfcm 2,193,908 17,927,397 1,564,857 17
Shearing force (joint) S kgf 11,442 45,829 30,628
Axial force N kgf 0 0 0
Height of member h cm 173.3 250.0 250.0
Covering depth d' cm 7.0 7.0 10.0
Effective height d cm 166.3 243.0 240.0
Effective width b cm 100.0 100.0 100.0
Young's modulus ratio n - 24 24 24
Required R-bar Asreq cm2 7.88 43.05 3.75
47.74
R-bar arrangement 25~125 25~250 22~120 25~250 25~250 25~250 2?
Reinforcement As cm2 39.27 19.63 31.68 19.63 19.63 19.63
Perimeter of R-bar U cm 62.83 ok 57.60 ok 31.42 ok
Dist. from neutral axis x cm 47.36 53.66 43.08
Compressive stress sc kgf/cm2 6.2 29.7 3.2
Allowable stress sca kgf/cm2 60.0 60.0 60.0
ok ok ok
Tensile stress ss kgf/cm2 371.1 2514.0 353.2
Allowable stress ssa kgf/cm2 1850.0 1850.0 1850.0
ok check ok
Shearing stress at joint t kgf/cm2 0.69 1.89 1.28
Allowable stress ta kgf/cm2 5.50 5.50 5.50
ok ok ok
Resisting Moment Mr kgfcm 9,474,069 11,951,949 6,195,675 15
Mr for compression Mrc kgfcm 9,474,069 21,684,038 12,974,649 23
x for Mrc cm 35.274 44.749 32.443
ss for Mrc kgf/cm2 2694.8 4237.9 4956.9
Mr for tensile Mrs kgfcm 10,274,372 11,951,949 6,195,675 15
x for Mrs cm 43.694 51.796 36.855
sc for Mrs kgf/cm2 58.5 32.0 26.5
Distribution bar (>As/6 and >Asmin) 6.54 3.27 5.28 3.27 3.27 3.27
16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 1
Reinforcement As cm2 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70
ok ok ok ok ok ok
Minimum requirement of distribution bar As min = 4.50 cm2
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 22/24
Reinforcement Bar Arrangement and Stress
Seismic ConditionName of Structure : D4 - Kolam Olak
Location : Randangan
Wall (upper) Wall (lower) Footing (toe)Section A-A Section B-B Section C-C
back front back front lower upper
Bending moment M kgfcm 3,748,721 30,210,753 1,853,785 30
Shearing force (joint) S kgf 19,128 75,203 36,224
Axial force N kgf 0 0 0
Height of member h cm 173.3 250.0 250.0
Covering depth d' cm 7.0 7.0 10.0
Effective height d cm 166.3 243.0 240.0
Effective width b cm 100.0 100.0 100.0
Young's modulus ratio n - 16 16 16
Required R-bar Asreq cm2 8.83 47.74 2.93
R-bar arrangement 25~125 25~250 22~120 25~250 25~250 25~250 2?
Reinforcement As cm2 39.27 19.63 31.68 19.63 19.63 19.63
Perimeter of R-bar U cm 62.83 57.60 31.42
Dist. from neutral axis x cm 39.87 44.82 35.82
Compressive stress sc kgf/cm2 12.3 59.1 4.5
Allowable stress sca kgf/cm2 90.0 90.0 90.0
ok ok ok
Tensile stress ss kgf/cm2 623.7 4181.8 414.0
Allowable stress ssa kgf/cm2 2775.0 2775.0 2775.0
ok check ok
Shearing stress at joint t kgf/cm2 1.15 3.09 1.51
Allowable stress ta kgf/cm2 8.25 8.25 8.25
ok ok ok
Resisting Moment Mr kgfcm 11,819,867 16,795,973 8,719,194 21
Mr for compression Mrc kgfcm 11,819,867 25,783,191 15,517,219 28
x for Mrc cm 29.514 36.600 26.549
ss for Mrc kgf/cm2 3382.1 5199.2 6084.6
Mr for tensile Mrs kgfcm 14,014,672 16,795,973 8,719,194 21
x for Mrs cm 35.242 41.359 29.524
sc for Mrs kgf/cm2 96.1 56.3 46.9
Distribution bar (>As/6 and >Asmin) 16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 16~300 1
Reinforcement As cm2 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70
Minimum requirement of distribution bar As min = 4.50 cm2
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 23/24
( )
+
D25~125D25~250
D16~300
D16~300
D22~120 D25~250
D16~300
D16~300
D16~300 D16~300
D25~125 D25~250
+
+
D25~250
D16~300 D25~250 D16~300
concrete = m3reinforcement = kg
cost estimate = kg/m3
Reinforcement Bar ArrangementD4 - Kolam Olak
1.50 1.00 0.00
12.50
-1.25
1.00
Randangan
8.25
5.50
13.75
1.50
1.75
34
451,537
Section of Retaining wall
2.50
12.00
8.50 1.00
D
A A
B BC
CD
161204550.xls.ms_office-7/30/2013
7/27/2019 Retaining Wall Kolam Olak 23-12-2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/retaining-wall-kolam-olak-23-12-2012 24/24
12th Oct, Stability Analysis
Uplift pressure are added for stability analysis.
Reinforcement Bar Arrangement
Reinforcement bar for Footing (heel) are collected.
Jan. 7, '03 Stability
Calculation formula in case of (B/6 < e < B/3) under seismic condition are corrected.
(distributed width of reaction of foundation soil)
Structure
Calculation formula in case of (B/6 < e < B/3) under seismic condition are corrected.
(distributed width of reaction of foundation soil)