Results SectiondraftsHM Jan2

8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Jan2

1/26

Result

1.1 Demographic Characteristics

Table 1: Age of Children under 2 (n=358)

Age of children (n=300) Freq %

0 to 5 months 107 30

6 to 11 months 95 27

12 to 23 months 156 43

Total 358 100.0

Table 2: Sex of Children under 2 (n=358)

Sex of children (n=358) Freq %

Female 137 45.7

Male 163 54.3

Total 358 100.0

1.2 Maternal and newborn care:

Table 5: Health Center/Home Delivery

Freq %

Health Center 213 59,7

Home 144 40,3

Total 357 100,0

60% of deliveries take place in the Health centers. It is twice the baseline line (29%). While

there has been modest increase in the extension of Health facility coverage between 2007 (52Health post) and 2011 (60 Health post) in the Konni District in general. In the surveyed 60

villages, the number of HP and Primary Health Care ( CSI) Centers has even remainedunchanged. Improved Health care delivery and Community Mobilization in project area may

have contributed .

Table 6: Assistance during the Delivery (n=358)

Person who assisted Freq %


2/26

*within this group, 4 responses were categorized as auxiliaire and the cross check

on where this staff exist shows that they are in Health Centers. This could be related

to Health post workers ( HPw) who temporarily work in Integrated Health Centers (

CSI) during the Frequent absence of the Chief CSI nurse in the majority of Health

centers staffed by only one or 2 nurses.

The Catch indicator includes Health post worker as qualified Personnel since theywere trained by Project in Clean Delivery. Some of this HPW are nurses but may not

be known as such by respondents.

There almost 40% of delivery still attended by TBA (Matrons) even though they arenot considered as skilled personnel. The project has devoted considerable time in the

sensitization to teach to TBA in their new role of companion to delivery .

Table 6: Home delivery By TBA

HomedeliveryTBA Frequency Percent

Yes 67 47,2%

No 75

Total 142 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

Yes 38,8% 55,7%

No 44,3% 61,2%

Comments:

when we cross where do the Birth assisted by matrons took, we find that only half ofthem were at Home, 50% of these Births assisted by TBA( 75/142) occurred inHealth Centers. This is well know practices particularly in CSI and District Hospital

where matrons are still used for night shift under Midwife supervision. Officiallymatrons are expected even in those centers to only accompany Parturient to Maternity

and help the women in post partum wards. But the reality is that matrons continue toassist delivery when the Midwife actually went to rest during night guards.

Doctor/ Nurse/Midwife 161 45

HP worker 28 8

Traditional birth attendant 140 40

Other 25*

Not assisted 2

Total 358 100.0


3/26

Table 7: Use of Clean delivery Kits (n=358)

76% of the deliveries benefited clean delivery kit. Project has provided a single usedelivery Kit in health centers. The Kit comprises a 2 Yards Cloth to wrap the baby, a

razor blade for Cordon Section, a gloves and soap. While 60% of the deliveryoccurred in health centers, approximately 16% of Kit used were either at home or

elsewhere. This is a significant increase compared to 21% of Kit delivery use at

baseline KPC

Table 8: Post Natal check for Mother within first week

When did the Check take place ? Frequency Percent

Hour 1 159 79,1%

Day 1 19 9,5%

Week1 3 1,5%

Do not Know 20 10,0%

Total 201 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

Hours72,8

%

84,5%

Day1 5,8% 14,4%

Do not Know 6,2% 14,9%

Week 1 0,3% 4,3%

Was a Clean Delivery Kit

used during delivery?

Freq %

Yes 272 76

No 84

Do Not Know 2 1

Total 358 100.0


4/26

88% (178/201) of mothers who delivered in Health Centers had a post natal check within the

first week and 80% of them had the check within the day after delivery. The total number ofthe respondents matches with 213 who delivered in Health Center.

Only 29 mothers were able to identify the Health personnel who performed the Check. Half ofthem (51%) were done by Health post Worker. 4 checks done by midwifes and 2 by Doctors.

It appears clearly that Doctor and Midwife are most recognizable or may be more

communicative (?) Than Nurses and Health Post worker, since the number of deliveriesassisted by Midwife and Doctors are the same for the post natal checks.

Table 9: Post Natal Check within 3 days for New born

Freq Percent

Yes 34 54,0%

No 29 46,0%

Total 63 100,0%

36% (63/216) of mothers said that their baby was checked by the health personnel of thefacility where they delivered but only half of the Newborn (38) were checked within the week

after birth.

1.3 Breastfeeding

Table10: Time of Breastfeeding after Birth (n=358)

94% of the newborn were breastfed Immediately ( with 1 hour) and same proportionwere given colostrums during the first 3 days after birth and 84% of them new were

not given any other feed during the same period. This is twice (42%) higher thanbaseline rates.

Table11: Exclusive Breafeeding/ breastmilk and simple water (n= 107) pending

analysis

Time Freq %

Within 1 hour (Initiation ) 339 94%

After 1 hour 13 62.0

Did not Know 6 2.7

Total 358 100.0

Type of feeding Freq %

EBF

Total 107 100.0


5/26

1.4 Vitamin A Supplementation

Table 12: Children who received Vit A (n=251)

The survey noted that among children aged 6-23 months 74% were reported to have received

a dose of vitamin A in the last six months while baseline noted only 10% of the children aged

6-23 months received a dose of vitamin A in the last six months.

1.5 Vaccination:

Table 13: Health Card/vaccination possessionDo you have a card where your childs

vaccinations are written down?Freq %

Yes,seen by the

Surveyor

273 76,3

Do not Know 1 ,3

Not availalbe 68 19,0

Never had a Card 16 4,5

Total 358 100,0

73% of mothers possess Health or vaccination cards. Baseline line value is 61%. The major

issue with Health/vaccination card is that they are not filled mostly by Health personnel.

72% (258/358) of mother mentioned to have received vaccination that is not written in the

book.

Table 14: Children who received Penta 1 / Penta3 (n=120, children 12-23mth whopossess vaccination card)

Received Vit A (at least once) Freq %

Yes 184 74

No 62

Did not know 4 1

Blank 1 0

Total 251 100.0

Freq %Penta 1 94 78

Penta3 49 41


6/26

Table 15: Children who received Vit A (Most Recent Dose, children 6-23, card

seen by enumerator)

y This result is obtained from a cross table of Q44 (did the child receive a single dose ofVitamin A with the last 6 month) and Q45 ( do the mother possess a vaccination

card?) as indicated in the KPC 2000Tabulation guide .The 65 responses categorized

as NA includes children 8-23 month who either have the card and not available

(n=50) or never possess a vaccination card (n= 11) or 1 mother was not clear whether

she possessed a card or not and therefore classified as No. If the we calculate the

percentage of children whos mother said to have received a single dose of Vitamin A

whether or not they have a vaccination card, then the percentage increase to 74%.

y In contrary when we calculate the proportion of children who possessed a vaccinationcard in which is mentioned that the child has received a Vitamin A dose either the date

is or not found; the percentage will drop to 11% only.

Tab 13: BCG

Table 16: Children who received Measles vaccine ( children 9-23, card seen by

enumerator)

The percentage of children who had measles vaccination is calculated among children 9-23.

51% of them had the vaccination. The percentage remains the same when it is calculated

among children 12-23mth ( 52%= 78/151)

1.6 Malaria:

Freq %

Yes 140 56 No 46

NA 65* 25

Total 251 100.0

Received VAR? Freq %

Yes 94 51%

No 48

Do not Know 40* 26%

Total 189 100.0


7/26

Table 17: Children who had Malaria and received appropriate Treatment

59% (212/358) of the children had fever in the last 2 weeks prior the survey and 68% of them

were treated with appropriate anti malarial ( ACT, Fansidar, Chloro and amodiaquine) within

24h of the onset of the fever. This is a moderate decrease in the prevalence of malaria from

2008 KPC (64%) but access to the treatment has been significantly improved from 17.5% in

2008. Coexistence of reported high prevalence of malaria cases and ITNS alleged used in

survey in a National pattern known in Niger by Both small scale project and the National

Malaria Program. Possible reason to look at in further investigation are the time people start

using the ITN at night time and issues pertaining to drug resistance because even though theNational policy has adopted since 2008 use of combined Artemisin drugs, Choloroquine,

amodiaquine are still be used as first line therapy mostly by Ambulant Pharmacist.

Table 18: ITN possession

96% of mothers in the surveyed villages have mosquito net in their Household.

Table 19: use of ITN possession by Mother and child

Freq %

Yes 344 96

No 12

Do not Know 2* 0.6

Total 358 100.0

Freq %

Yes 266 76*

No 78

Total 344 100.0

Freq %

Yes 144 68%

No 72 Do not Know

Total 212 100.0


8/26

In 76% of those Household who possessed Mosquito, the mother used it for them and their

children. The indicator was calculated on a proxy basis of Num of Mothers who gave ananswer on the Type of the Mosquito Net used. This answer is only required to Mother who

answers that they used the Mosquito Net for their child.

1.7 Diarrhoea:

Table 20: Diarrhea and ORS use

Freq %

Yes 193 53,8

No 164 45,7

Do Not Know 2 ,6

Total 359 100,0

Half of the children ( 54%) had a diarrhea episode during the last 2 weeks and 50% of them

received ORS.

Freq %

Yes 96 50

No 97* 50

Total 193 100

* One ( 1) was not specified therefore considered as No

1.8 Acute Respiratory Infection:

Table 20:Pneumonia and seeking advice/ treatment from appropriate personnel( Doctor-Nurse- Health Post worker)

Half of the children, 55%( 197/358) had cough or rapid breath during the 2 weeks prior to

Seek advice/treatment? Freq %

Yes 86 44

No 78

Total 197 100.0


9/26

the survey. Only 1 mother of 2 seek advice/treatment from qualified personnel.

1.9 Hand washing:

1.10 Point of Use:

In 75% (270/358) of the surveyed households, mother used a method to treat water fordrinking. The majority 72% used a cloth filter the project has provided in villages where

inhabitants drink water directly from wells and pools ( marigot)

1.11 Catch Indicators:

Soap at Point of use ? Freq %

Yes 85 24

No 173

Total 258 100.0

Effective Method of treating

water?

Freq %

Cloth Filter 258 72

Chlorination 5 2

Heating 4 1

Solar disinfection 2 0

Sand filter 1 0

No method 78

Total 358 100.0

Baseline

(330)

End line

(358)

Indicator Num/Deno % CI Num/Deno % CI

Maternal and Newborn Care


10/26

1

Only 39answers of mothers about who controlled the child health.

Percentage of mothers with

children age 0-23 months who

received at least two Tetanus

toxoid vaccinations before the

birth of the youngest child

95/330 28.8% s 6.1% 261/322 81

Percentage of children age 0-23

months whose births were

attended by skilled personnel

87/330 26.4% s 6.7% 189/358 52%


months who received a post-

natal visit from an appropriately

trained health worker within

three days after birth

44/330 13.3% s 5.2% 38/358

11%1*

IYCF :Breastfeeding


months who were exclusively

breastfed during the last 24 hours

31/86 36% +-14%

70/105 67

IYCF: Complementary Feeding

Percentage of infants and young

children age 6-23 months fed

according to a minimum ofappropriate feeding practices

94/244 38.1 NA NA

Vitamin A Supplementation


months who received a dose of

Vitamin A in the last 6 months

(Mothers recall)

26/244 10% 8.6

185/251

73

Immunization


months who received DPT3according to the

vaccination card or

mothers recall by the time

of the survey

39/137 28.5% s 10.7 %

49/120

41

Percentage of children age 12-23months who received a measles

vaccination

94/18951

Malaria


months who slept under an

insecticide-treated bed net the

previous night.

132/330 40.0% s 7.5% 266/344 76


months with a febrile episode

during the last two weeks whowere treated with an effective

anti-malarial drug within 24

hours after the fever began

35/199 17.5% s 7.5% 144/212 68

DiarrheaPercentage of children age 0-59

months with diarrhea in the last

two weeks who received oral

rehydration solution (ORS)

36/180 18.4% s 5.9% 96/193 50

ARI/Pneumonia


11/26

Percentage of children age 0-59months with chest-related cough

and fast and/ or difficult

breathing in the last two weeks

who were taken to an appropriate

health provider.

39/214 18.2% s 5.9% 86/189 44

Water and Sanitation

Percentage of households ofchildren age 0-23 months that

treated water effectively

50/330 15.2% 270/35875

Percentage of mothers of

children age 0-23 months who

live in a household with soap at

the place for hand washing

38/330 11.5%

85/358

24

Anthropometrics

Percentage of children 0-23

months who are underweight (-2

SD for the median weight for

age, according to WHO/HCHS

reference population)

100 330 30.3%

s 7.0%


12/26

1.12 Discussions on Key Indicators:

1.12.1

Detailed annexe: Q15-Q16

Q15:Did you ever breastfeed your child?

Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

validePourcentage

cumul

Valide NON 4 1,1 1,1 1,1

OUI 354 98,9 98,9 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?


validePourcentage

cumul

Valide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

IMMEDIATEMENT 259 72,3 72,3 94,7

JOURS 13 3,6 3,6 98,3

NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0


13/26

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q17:During the first three or four days after delivery, before your regular milk began flowing, did you give yourchild the liquid (colostrum) that came from your breast?


validePourcentage

cumul

Valide NON 18 5,0 5,0 5,0

OUI 340 95,0 95,0 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q18: In the first three days after delivery, was your child given anything to drink other than breast milk?


validePourcentage

cumul

Valide NON 302 84,4 84,4 84,4

OUI 56 15,6 15,6 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?


validePourcentage

cumul

Valide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

IMMEDIATEMENT 259 72,3 72,3 94,7

JOURS 13 3,6 3,6 98,3

NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0

Total 358 100,0 100,0

Q44:

tr_age Effec

tifs

Pourcen

tage

Pourcent

age

valide

Pourcent

age

cumul

1 Valide NON 25 23,4 23,4 23,4

OUI 82 76,6 76,6 100,0

Total 107 100,0 100,0

2 Valide NON 63 25,1 25,1 25,1

NSP 4 1,6 1,6 26,7

OUI 184 73,3 73,3 100,0

Total 251 100,0 100,0

Forward

VITAMINEA Frequency Percent Cum Percent

40241 1 3,6% 3,6%

40387 1 3,6% 7,1%


14/26

40494 1 3,6% 10,7%

40538 1 3,6% 14,3%

40559 1 3,6% 17,9%

40570 1 3,6% 21,4%

40596 1 3,6% 25,0%

40608 1 3,6% 28,6%

40617 1 3,6% 32,1%

40624 1 3,6% 35,7%

40628 1 3,6% 39,3%

40647 1 3,6% 42,9%

40659 1 3,6% 46,4%

40663 2 7,1% 53,6%

40681 1 3,6% 57,1%

40697 1 3,6% 60,7%40717 1 3,6% 64,3%

40718 1 3,6% 67,9%

40721 1 3,6% 71,4%

40756 1 3,6% 75,0%

40768 1 3,6% 78,6%

40779 1 3,6% 82,1%

40783 1 3,6% 85,7%

47484 3 10,7% 96,4%

146099 1 3,6% 100,0%Total 28 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

40241 0,1% 18,3%

40387 0,1% 18,3%

40494 0,1% 18,3%

40538 0,1% 18,3%

40559 0,1% 18,3%

40570 0,1% 18,3%40596 0,1% 18,3%

40608 0,1% 18,3%

40617 0,1% 18,3%

40624 0,1% 18,3%

40628 0,1% 18,3%

40647 0,1% 18,3%


15/26

40659 0,1% 18,3%

40663 0,9% 23,5%

40681 0,1% 18,3%

40697 0,1% 18,3%

40717 0,1% 18,3%

40718 0,1% 18,3%

40721 0,1% 18,3%

40756 0,1% 18,3%

40768 0,1% 18,3%

40779 0,1% 18,3%

40783 0,1% 18,3%

47484 2,3% 28,2%

146099 0,1% 18,3%

Previous Dataset Results Library

1.12.1.1 FREQQ44

Next Procedure

Forward

Q44 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

NON 62 24,8% 24,8%

NSP 4 1,6% 26,4%

OUI 184 73,6% 100,0%

Total 250 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

NON 19,6% 30,6%

NSP 0,4% 4,0%

OUI 67,7% 79,0%

Previous Dataset Results Library

1.12.1.2 TABLES VITAMINEA Q44

Next Procedure

Forward

Q44

VITAMINEA NON OUI TOTAL

40241 0 1 1


16/26

Row %

Col %

0,0

0,0

100,0

3,8

100,0

3,6

40387

Row %Col %

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,8

1

100,03,6

40494Row %

Col %

00,0

0,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40538

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40559

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40570

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40596Row %

Col %

00,0

0,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40608

Row %

Col %

1

100,0

50,0

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,6

40617

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40624

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40628

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40647

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40659

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,640663

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

2

100,0

7,7

2

100,0

7,1

40681

Row %Col %

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,8

1

100,03,6

40697 0 1 1


17/26

1.12.1.3 Single Table Analysis

Chi-

squaredf Probability

28,0000 24 0,2600

An expected value is < 5.

Chi-square not valid.

Tab: ExclusiveBreastfeeding

Row %

Col %

0,0

0,0

100,0

3,8

100,0

3,6

40717

Row %Col %

0

0,00,0

1

100,03,8

1

100,03,6

40718Row %

Col %

00,0

0,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40721

Row %

Col %

1

100,0

50,0

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,6

40756

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40768

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

40779Row %

Col %

00,0

0,0

1100,0

3,8

1100,0

3,6

40783

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

47484

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

3

100,0

11,5

3

100,0

10,7

146099

Row %

Col %

0

0,0

0,0

1

100,0

3,8

1

100,0

3,6

TOTAL

Row %

Col %

2

7,1

100,0

26

92,9

100,0

28

100,0

100,0


18/26

Exclusive Breasfeedingbf

Total1 2 3 4 5

tr_age 1 Effectif 92 0 9 6 0 107% comprisdanstr_age

86,0% ,0% 8,4% 5,6% ,0% 100,0%

% comprisdans bf

29,5% ,0% 34,6% 40,0% ,0% 29,9%

% du total 25,7% ,0% 2,5% 1,7% ,0% 29,9%

2 Effectif 220 3 17 9 2 251

% comprisdanstr_age

87,6% 1,2% 6,8% 3,6% ,8% 100,0%

% comprisdans bf

70,5% 100,0% 65,4% 60,0% 100,0% 70,1%

% du total 61,5% ,8% 4,7% 2,5% ,6% 70,1%

:\Users\Relief2\Desktop\KPC report ne\Ali Results Dec

26\ClasseurfullrecombinedHMdec27.xls:Feuil1$

Select:(Q45 = "Oui, vu par l'enqueteur" ) AND (Age >

11 )Record Count:120 Date:31/12/2011 18:02:44

1.12.1.4 FREQ DTC1Penta1 DTC3Penta3

Next Procedure

DTC1Penta1

DTC3Penta3

1.12.1.5 DTC1Penta1

Forward

DTC1Penta1 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

22/05/2001 1 1,1% 1,1%

28/12/2009 1 1,1% 2,1%

24/02/2010 2 2,1% 4,3%

15/03/2010 1 1,1% 5,3%


19/26

26/03/2010 1 1,1% 6,4%

09/04/2010 1 1,1% 7,4%

21/04/2010 1 1,1% 8,5%

23/04/2010 1 1,1% 9,6%

24/04/2010 1 1,1% 10,6%

27/04/2010 1 1,1% 11,7%

05/06/2010 1 1,1% 12,8%

21/06/2010 1 1,1% 13,8%

27/06/2010 1 1,1% 14,9%

16/07/2010 1 1,1% 16,0%

29/07/2010 3 3,2% 19,1%

26/08/2010 1 1,1% 20,2%

03/09/2010 1 1,1% 21,3%

05/09/2010 1 1,1% 22,3%08/09/2010 1 1,1% 23,4%

22/09/2010 1 1,1% 24,5%

23/09/2010 1 1,1% 25,5%

24/09/2010 1 1,1% 26,6%

11/10/2010 1 1,1% 27,7%

23/10/2010 1 1,1% 28,7%

23/11/2010 1 1,1% 29,8%

25/11/2010 1 1,1% 30,9%

06/12/2010 1 1,1% 31,9%08/12/2010 1 1,1% 33,0%

22/12/2010 1 1,1% 34,0%

05/01/2011 1 1,1% 35,1%

07/01/2011 1 1,1% 36,2%

15/01/2011 1 1,1% 37,2%

20/01/2011 1 1,1% 38,3%

22/01/2011 1 1,1% 39,4%

24/01/2011 1 1,1% 40,4%

25/01/2011 1 1,1% 41,5%15/02/2011 1 1,1% 42,6%

21/02/2011 1 1,1% 43,6%

26/02/2011 1 1,1% 44,7%

14/03/2011 1 1,1% 45,7%

29/03/2011 1 1,1% 46,8%

13/04/2011 1 1,1% 47,9%


20/26

21/04/2011 1 1,1% 48,9%

25/04/2011 1 1,1% 50,0%

30/04/2011 5 5,3% 55,3%

02/05/2011 1 1,1% 56,4%

11/05/2011 1 1,1% 57,4%

12/05/2011 1 1,1% 58,5%

18/05/2011 1 1,1% 59,6%

26/05/2011 1 1,1% 60,6%

27/05/2011 1 1,1% 61,7%

28/05/2011 1 1,1% 62,8%

30/05/2011 1 1,1% 63,8%

31/05/2011 1 1,1% 64,9%

03/06/2011 4 4,3% 69,1%

05/06/2011 2 2,1% 71,3%21/06/2011 1 1,1% 72,3%

22/06/2011 1 1,1% 73,4%

23/06/2011 1 1,1% 74,5%

24/06/2011 3 3,2% 77,7%

25/06/2011 2 2,1% 79,8%

26/06/2011 1 1,1% 80,9%

28/06/2011 2 2,1% 83,0%

30/06/2011 1 1,1% 84,0%

04/07/2011 1 1,1% 85,1%17/07/2011 2 2,1% 87,2%

22/07/2011 1 1,1% 88,3%

29/07/2011 1 1,1% 89,4%

10/08/2011 1 1,1% 90,4%

17/08/2011 1 1,1% 91,5%

28/08/2011 1 1,1% 92,6%

12/09/2011 1 1,1% 93,6%

13/09/2011 1 1,1% 94,7%

20/09/2011 1 1,1% 95,7%28/10/2011 1 1,1% 96,8%

26/11/2011 1 1,1% 97,9%

03/09/2019 1 1,1% 98,9%

01/01/2030 1 1,1% 100,0%

Total 94 100,0% 100,0%


21/26

95% Conf Limits

22/05/2001 0,0% 5,8%

28/12/2009 0,0% 5,8%

24/02/2010 0,3% 7,5%15/03/2010 0,0% 5,8%

26/03/2010 0,0% 5,8%

09/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

21/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

23/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

24/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

27/04/2010 0,0% 5,8%

05/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%

21/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%

27/06/2010 0,0% 5,8%

16/07/2010 0,0% 5,8%

29/07/2010 0,7% 9,0%

26/08/2010 0,0% 5,8%

03/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

05/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

08/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

22/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

23/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

24/09/2010 0,0% 5,8%

11/10/2010 0,0% 5,8%

23/10/2010 0,0% 5,8%

23/11/2010 0,0% 5,8%

25/11/2010 0,0% 5,8%

06/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%

08/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%

22/12/2010 0,0% 5,8%

05/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

07/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

15/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%20/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

22/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

24/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

25/01/2011 0,0% 5,8%

15/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%

21/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%


22/26

26/02/2011 0,0% 5,8%

14/03/2011 0,0% 5,8%

29/03/2011 0,0% 5,8%

13/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%

21/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%

25/04/2011 0,0% 5,8%

30/04/2011 1,7% 12,0%

02/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

11/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

12/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

18/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

26/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

27/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

28/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

30/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

31/05/2011 0,0% 5,8%

03/06/2011 1,2% 10,5%

05/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%

21/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

22/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

23/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

24/06/2011 0,7% 9,0%

25/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%

26/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

28/06/2011 0,3% 7,5%30/06/2011 0,0% 5,8%

04/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%

17/07/2011 0,3% 7,5%

22/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%

29/07/2011 0,0% 5,8%

10/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%

17/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%

28/08/2011 0,0% 5,8%

12/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%

13/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%

20/09/2011 0,0% 5,8%

28/10/2011 0,0% 5,8%

26/11/2011 0,0% 5,8%

03/09/2019 0,0% 5,8%

01/01/2030 0,0% 5,8%


23/26

1.12.1.6 DTC3Penta3

Back Forward Current Procedure

DTC3Penta3 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

24/04/2010 1 2,0% 2,0%

10/05/2010 1 2,0% 4,1%

22/06/2010 1 2,0% 6,1%

24/06/2010 1 2,0% 8,2%

21/08/2010 1 2,0% 10,2%

27/08/2010 1 2,0% 12,2%

09/09/2010 1 2,0% 14,3%

19/10/2010 1 2,0% 16,3%

10/11/2010 1 2,0% 18,4%

11/11/2010 1 2,0% 20,4%

07/12/2010 1 2,0% 22,4%

20/12/2010 1 2,0% 24,5%

14/01/2011 2 4,1% 28,6%

15/02/2011 1 2,0% 30,6%

21/02/2011 1 2,0% 32,7%

23/02/2011 1 2,0% 34,7%

09/03/2011 1 2,0% 36,7%

15/03/2011 1 2,0% 38,8%

22/03/2011 1 2,0% 40,8%

25/03/2011 1 2,0% 42,9%

18/04/2011 1 2,0% 44,9%

15/05/2011 1 2,0% 46,9%

18/05/2011 1 2,0% 49,0%

03/06/2011 2 4,1% 53,1%

04/06/2011 2 4,1% 57,1%

20/06/2011 1 2,0% 59,2%

29/06/2011 1 2,0% 61,2%

05/07/2011 1 2,0% 63,3%

12/07/2011 1 2,0% 65,3%

15/07/2011 1 2,0% 67,3%

20/07/2011 1 2,0% 69,4%


24/26

25/07/2011 1 2,0% 71,4%

26/07/2011 1 2,0% 73,5%

29/07/2011 2 4,1% 77,6%

31/07/2011 1 2,0% 79,6%

13/08/2011 1 2,0% 81,6%

27/08/2011 1 2,0% 83,7%

28/08/2011 2 4,1% 87,8%

09/09/2011 1 2,0% 89,8%

18/09/2011 1 2,0% 91,8%

11/10/2011 1 2,0% 93,9%

02/11/2011 1 2,0% 95,9%

14/11/2011 1 2,0% 98,0%

22/11/2011 1 2,0% 100,0%

Total 49 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

24/04/2010 0,1% 10,9%

10/05/2010 0,1% 10,9%

22/06/2010 0,1% 10,9%

24/06/2010 0,1% 10,9%

21/08/2010 0,1% 10,9%

27/08/2010 0,1% 10,9%

09/09/2010 0,1% 10,9%19/10/2010 0,1% 10,9%

10/11/2010 0,1% 10,9%

11/11/2010 0,1% 10,9%

07/12/2010 0,1% 10,9%

20/12/2010 0,1% 10,9%

14/01/2011 0,5% 14,0%

15/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%

21/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%

23/02/2011 0,1% 10,9%

09/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%

15/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%

22/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%

25/03/2011 0,1% 10,9%

18/04/2011 0,1% 10,9%

15/05/2011 0,1% 10,9%

18/05/2011 0,1% 10,9%


25/26

03/06/2011 0,5% 14,0%

04/06/2011 0,5% 14,0%

20/06/2011 0,1% 10,9%

29/06/2011 0,1% 10,9%

05/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

12/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

15/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

20/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

25/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

26/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

29/07/2011 0,5% 14,0%

31/07/2011 0,1% 10,9%

13/08/2011 0,1% 10,9%

27/08/2011 0,1% 10,9%

28/08/2011 0,5% 14,0%

09/09/2011 0,1% 10,9%

18/09/2011 0,1% 10,9%

11/10/2011 0,1% 10,9%

02/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%

14/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%

22/11/2011 0,1% 10,9%

Select age>11, freq

Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent

NON 37 32,2% 32,2%

OUI 78 67,8% 100,0%

Total 115 100,0% 100,0%

Next Procedure

Forward


NON 43 31,4% 31,4%

OUI 94 68,6% 100,0%

Total 137 100,0% 100,0%


26/26

95% Conf Limits

NON 23,7% 39,9%

OUI 60,1% 76,3%

Next Procedure

Forward


NON 37 32,2% 32,2%

OUI 78 67,8% 100,0%

Total 115 100,0% 100,0%

95% Conf Limits

NON 23,8% 41,5%

OUI 58,5% 76,2%

Documents

Results SectiondraftsHM Jan2