85
Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) Fall 2010 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research January, 19, 2011

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

(SEOI)

Fall 2010

Prepared by: Office of Institutional ResearchJanuary, 19, 2011

Page 2: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

GB: ToC.doc Prepared 01/19/11

Fall 2010

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Overview Analysis of SEOI Questions Full-Time/Part-Time Academic Instructors ……………… Tab 1 Full-Time/Part-Time Workforce Instructors ……………... Tab 2 Learning Resources Results………………………………………... Tab 3 Means Reports Academic ………………………………………………………. Tab 4 Workforce ……………………………………………………… Tab 5 Appendices ……………………………………………………………. Tab 6 Instructor and Student Proctor Directions SEOI Survey How to Read the Individual Instructor Report Please assist us by sharing all or parts of this document with colleagues who might find it useful. You may contact Mario Heredia (713) 718-8627, or Ray Golitko (713) 718-8629, if you have any questions or comments on this material.

Page 3: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Executive Summary Fall 2010 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and part-time faculty. Approximately 123,461 surveys were sent out in 5,516 envelopes; 86,998 surveys were returned to the Office of Institutional Research. The return rate for the SEOI packet envelopes was 97.0%. The instructors’ reports were provided to academic, workforce deans and to the respective executive secretaries on December 17, 2010 on a CD. Methods Used: The optical-scan survey instrument was created using ScanTools for Windows, by National Computer Systems. The scanned data were analyzed by OIR using SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students with the questionnaires were student comment sheets, which were later returned in their original hand-written form to the instructors via their respective deans’ offices. Library data were analyzed by subject and location and provided to library chairs for their use.

Page 4: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Overview of SEOI Responses, Fall 2010

In the responses discussed below, respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed, indicated that they were ‘neutral’, ‘had no basis for judgment’ or simply did not respond to the question. In Part I, Evaluation of Instruction:

The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated; 91.1% of students agreed and 1.7% disagreed.

The textbook used for this course is suitable; 86.3% of respondents agreed while 2.5% disagreed.

Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course

enhanced my learning of the subject matter; 81.4% of respondents agreed, and 3.8% disagreed.

In Part II, Evaluation of Instructor:

The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course; 91.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.5% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor communicates clearly; 87.5% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The assignments were relevant to the course; 92.6% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.7% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

My grades are an indication of learning; 85.3% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor treats students with respect; 93.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor is available for student consultation; 88.3% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor grades impartially; 79.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 7.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work; 85.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part III, Lab Evaluation:

In the section below, students who indicated an opinion are calculated in the agreement/disagreement percentages; those who indicated ‘no basis for judgment’ or did not respond were assumed not to be enrolled in laboratory or clinical courses.

The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical; 84.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture; 83.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.8% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part IV, Overall Evaluation:

The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process; 87.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.2% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

I would recommend this instructor to other students; 84.8% agreed or strongly agreed, and 5.7% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 5: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Yes (n=56730)

Neutral (n=7478)

No (n=1635)

91.5

7.0

1.5

90.7

7.5

1.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=62125) Neutral (n=4958) No (n=1141)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,224)

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

86.0

11.6

2.4

86.3

11.1

2.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=56730) Neutral (n=7478) No (n=1635)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=65,843)

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q1&2.xls 1/20/2011

Page 6: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

81.9

14.8

3.3

80.0

15.6

4.40.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=52040) Neutral (n=9810) No (n=2501)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=64,351)

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q3.xls 1/24/2011

Page 7: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=17122)

Neutral (n=5770)

Disagree (n=2081)

65.2

26.9

5.61.6 0.7

64.4

26.8

6.1 1.7 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=44470)

Agree (n=18442)

Neutral (n=4026)

Disagree (n=1139)

Strongly Disagree (n=588)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,665)

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

63.8

24.8

7.6 2.6 1.2

61.4

24.5

8.9 3.3 1.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=43445)

Agree (n=17122)

Neutral (n=5770)

Disagree (n=2081)

Strongly Disagree (n=1060)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=69,478)

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q4&5.xls 1/20/2011

Page 8: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=19832)

Neutral (n=7522)

Disagree (n=2057)

65.9

27.3

5.3 1.0 0.5

64.8

27.1

6.2 1.3 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=45125)

Agree (n=18793)

Neutral (n=4002)

Disagree (n=801)

Strongly Disagree (n=405)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=69,126)

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

56.5

28.6

10.9

2.8 1.1

55.6

29.1

10.9

3.1 1.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=38514)

Agree (n=19832)

Neutral (n=7522)

Disagree (n=2057)

Strongly Disagree (n=829)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,754)

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q6&7.xls 1/20/2011

Page 9: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=17446)

Neutral (n=6405)

Disagree (n=1084)

62.7

26.3

8.9 1.4 0.7

61.4

25.7 10.1

1.8 1.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=41630)

Agree (n=17446)Neutral (n=6405) Disagree (n=1084)

Strongly Disagree (n=579)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=67,144)

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

70.6

22.4

5.1 1.1 0.8

71.3

21.7

5.0 1.2 0.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=49109)

Agree (n=15251)

Neutral (n=3478)

Disagree (n=796)

Strongly Disagree (n=578)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=69,212)

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q8&9.xls 1/20/2011

Page 10: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

58.4

27.210.4

2.8 1.2

58.2

26.9 10.7

2.9 1.40.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=39642)

Agree (n=18404)

Neutral (n=7159)

Disagree (n=1941)

Strongly Disagree (n=888)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,034)

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

54.4

24.5 13.2

5.02.9

53.4

24.2 13.9

5.33.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=35619)

Agree (n=16063)

Neutral (n=8953)

Disagree (n=3409)

Strongly Disagree (n=2028)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=66,072)

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q10&11.xls 1/20/2011

Page 11: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

57.1

27.313.4

1.4 0.8

55.7

27.0 14.3

2.0 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=18179)

Agree (n=8751) Neutral (n=4479)

Disagree (n=549)

Strongly Disagree (n=296)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=32,254)

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

56.2

27.4 13.8

1.8 0.8

54.4

26.8 15.4

2.3 1.10.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=17701)

Agree (n=8682) Neutral (n=4698)

Disagree (n=673)

Strongly Disagree (n=311)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=32,065)

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q12&13.xls 1/24/2011

Page 12: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Strongly Agree (n=42646)

Agree (n=15130)

Neutral (n=6667)

Disagree (n=2099)

Strongly Disagree (n=2025)

60.8

27.2

9.0 2.1 0.9

61.0

25.79.6

2.4 1.20.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=41991)

Agree (n=18230) Neutral (n=6436) Disagree (n=1579)

Strongly Disagree (n=755)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,991)

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

62.7

22.4

9.5 2.8 2.6

61.8

21.8 10.0

3.3 3.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=42646)

Agree (n=15130)

Neutral (n=6667)

Disagree (n=2099)

Strongly Disagree (n=2025)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=68,567)

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q14&15.xls 1/20/2011

Page 13: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Yes (n=13233)

Neutral (n=1588)

No (n=362)

91.2

7.3 1.5

91.3

6.9 1.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=14751) Neutral (n=1147) No (n=269)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,167)

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

87.6

10.2

2.1

86.5

10.8

2.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=13233) Neutral (n=1588) No (n=362)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=15,183)

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q1&2.xls 1/20/2011

Page 14: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

84.8

12.2

3.0

82.6

13.6

3.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=12838) Neutral (n=1956) No (n=512)

Perc

enta

ge

Reponses (Total=15,306)

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q3.xls 1/20/2011

Page 15: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=4178)

Neutral (n=1207)

Disagree (n=450)

63.5

28.5

5.71.6 0.7

66.0

26.4

5.31.6 0.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10360)

Agree (n=4435)

Neutral (n=885)

Disagree (n=254)

Strongly Disagree (n=118)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,052)

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

62.7

25.8 7.4

2.8 1.3

64.3

24.7 7.1

2.6 1.30.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10465)

Agree (n=4178)

Neutral (n=1207)

Disagree (n=450)

Strongly Disagree (n=207)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,507)

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q4&5.xls 1/20/2011

Page 16: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=4675)

Neutral (n=1515)

Disagree (n=426)

65.4

27.8

5.5 0.9 0.5

68.1

25.7

4.6 0.90.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10896)

Agree (n=4405)Neutral (n=837) Disagree (n=149)

Strongly Disagree (n=92)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,379)

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

56.8

29.7

9.5

3.0 1.0

59.8

27.9

9.1

2.1 1.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9381)

Agree (n=4675) Neutral (n=1515)

Disagree (n=426)

Strongly Disagree (n=160)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,157)

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q6&7.xls 1/24/2011

Page 17: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Agree (n=4042)

Neutral (n=1310)

Disagree (n=227)

63.7

25.6 8.4

1.5 0.7

64.7

24.98.0

1.3 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10230)

Agree (n=4042) Neutral (n=1310)

Disagree (n=227)

Strongly Disagree (n=139)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=15,948)

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

69.0

23.4

5.3 1.3 1.0

73.0

21.7

3.9 0.8 0.60.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=11634)

Agree (n=3728)Neutral (n=778) Disagree (n=182)

Strongly Disagree (n=138)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,460)

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q8&9.xls 1/20/2011

Page 18: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

60.0

27.2 9.6

2.1 1.2

61.3

26.6 8.8

2.3 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9636)

Agree (n=4284) Neutral (n=1472)

Disagree (n=347)

Strongly Disagree (n=182)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=15,921)

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

58.1

24.7 10.6

4.0 2.6

58.9

24.210.1

4.4 2.40.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9134)

Agree (n=3826) Neutral (n=1626)

Disagree (n=647)

Strongly Disagree (n=395)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=15,628)

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q10&11.xls 1/20/2011

Page 19: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

Strongly Agree (n=6488)

Agree (n=2734)

Neutral (n=1030)

Disagree (n=127)

Strongly Disagree (n=73)

64.3

25.7 8.7

0.9 0.4

62.0

26.0 10.3

0.9 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=6598)

Agree (n=2692) Neutral (n=973) Disagree (n=94)

Strongly Disagree (n=59)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=10,416)

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

62.4

26.4 9.3

1.2 0.7

61.6

25.8 10.7

1.2 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=6488)

Agree (n=2734) Neutral (n=1030)

Disagree (n=127)

Strongly Disagree (n=73)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=10,452)

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q12&13.xls 1/20/2011

Page 20: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2010Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Strongly Agree (n=10608)

Agree (n=3624)

Neutral (n=1351)

Disagree (n=387)

Strongly Disagree (n=341)

64.4

25.7

7.5 1.5 0.9

66.1

24.8

6.7 1.4 0.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10691)

Agree (n=4161) Neutral (n=1172)

Disagree (n=245)

Strongly Disagree (n=149)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,418)

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

64.5

22.5 8.3

2.6 2.1

65.8

21.8 8.2

2.1 2.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10608)

Agree (n=3624) Neutral (n=1351)

Disagree (n=387)

Strongly Disagree (n=341)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=16,311)

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall10_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q14&15.xls 1/20/2011

Page 21: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 4 1 1 6

Row % 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 100.0%

South Campus - CE Count 555 272 147 19 10 149 1152

Row % 48.2% 23.6% 12.8% 1.6% 0.9% 12.9% 100.0%

Central Count 5304 3409 2407 336 138 3357 14951

Row % 35.5% 22.8% 16.1% 2.2% 0.9% 22.5% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 136 53 56 16 8 163 432

Row % 31.5% 12.3% 13.0% 3.7% 1.9% 37.7% 100.0%

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1 2

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Coleman HS-Off Campus Count 430 278 227 34 17 328 1314

Row % 32.7% 21.2% 17.3% 2.6% 1.3% 25.0% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 988 755 663 139 69 1048 3662

Row % 27.0% 20.6% 18.1% 3.8% 1.9% 28.6% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 21 13 5 1 8 48

Row % 43.8% 27.1% 10.4% 2.1% 16.7% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 248 94 55 24 30 6 457

Row % 54.3% 20.6% 12.0% 5.3% 6.6% 1.3% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NE Count 1 1 2

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 2155 1255 741 85 27 971 5234

Row % 41.2% 24.0% 14.2% 1.6% 0.5% 18.6% 100.0%

Northeast Campus Count 657 337 211 40 19 358 1622

Row % 40.5% 20.8% 13.0% 2.5% 1.2% 22.1% 100.0%

NE Dual Credit Count 2 2

Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

Fall2010_library_means.xls 1 12-17-2010

Page 22: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

SW College Opt Count 72 34 9 2 32 149

Row % 48.3% 22.8% 6.0% 1.3% 21.5% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 679 358 201 29 13 265 1545

Row % 43.9% 23.2% 13.0% 1.9% 0.8% 17.2% 100.0%

Northwest Spring Branch Campus - NWCount 3878 2454 1991 238 113 2680 11354

Row % 34.2% 21.6% 17.5% 2.1% 1.0% 23.6% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 2 2 4

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Westgate Ctr Count 2059 1282 1092 117 87 1585 6222

Row % 33.1% 20.6% 17.6% 1.9% 1.4% 25.5% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 12 8 4 1 25

Row % 48.0% 32.0% 16.0% 4.0% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 2576 1740 957 101 47 983 6404

Row % 40.2% 27.2% 14.9% 1.6% 0.7% 15.3% 100.0%

Office City SE Count 89 38 23 5 1 13 169

Row % 52.7% 22.5% 13.6% 3.0% 0.6% 7.7% 100.0%

Felix Fraga Academic CampusCount 457 335 243 32 11 239 1317

Row % 34.7% 25.4% 18.5% 2.4% 0.8% 18.1% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 377 312 120 35 6 55 905

Row % 41.7% 34.5% 13.3% 3.9% 0.7% 6.1% 100.0%

SW Dual Credit Count 6 2 2 2 13 25

Row % 24.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 52.0% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1517 961 792 129 82 696 4177

Row % 36.3% 23.0% 19.0% 3.1% 2.0% 16.7% 100.0%

Alief Cont. Ed. Count 80 66 43 8 7 82 286

Row % 28.0% 23.1% 15.0% 2.8% 2.4% 28.7% 100.0%

Fall2010_library_means.xls 2 12-17-2010

Page 23: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

Stafford Ctr Count 4332 2630 1869 222 86 1981 11120

Row % 39.0% 23.7% 16.8% 2.0% 0.8% 17.8% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 572 345 217 17 13 248 1412

Row % 40.5% 24.4% 15.4% 1.2% 0.9% 17.6% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 2850 1755 1133 145 64 1511 7458

Row % 38.2% 23.5% 15.2% 1.9% 0.9% 20.3% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-SW Count 3 4 3 1 1 12

Row % 25.0% 33.3% 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 100.0%

Fall2010_library_means.xls 3 12-17-2010

Page 24: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 4 1 1 6

Row % 66.7% 16.7% 16.7% 100.0%

South Campus - CE Count 540 261 145 15 11 173 1145

Row % 47.2% 22.8% 12.7% 1.3% 1.0% 15.1% 100.0%

Central Count 5034 3199 2454 235 104 3820 14846

Row % 33.9% 21.5% 16.5% 1.6% 0.7% 25.7% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 135 49 56 9 8 171 428

Row % 31.5% 11.4% 13.1% 2.1% 1.9% 40.0% 100.0%

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1 2

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Coleman HS-Off Campus Count 412 253 226 24 16 374 1305

Row % 31.6% 19.4% 17.3% 1.8% 1.2% 28.7% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 956 677 688 83 43 1203 3650

Row % 26.2% 18.5% 18.8% 2.3% 1.2% 33.0% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 19 11 7 1 10 48

Row % 39.6% 22.9% 14.6% 2.1% 20.8% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 226 114 72 11 22 11 456

Row % 49.6% 25.0% 15.8% 2.4% 4.8% 2.4% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NE Count 1 1 2

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 1997 1196 793 65 26 1131 5208

Row % 38.3% 23.0% 15.2% 1.2% 0.5% 21.7% 100.0%

Northeast Campus Count 629 332 216 27 14 397 1615

Row % 38.9% 20.6% 13.4% 1.7% 0.9% 24.6% 100.0%

NE Dual Credit Count 2 2

Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Fall2010_library_means.xls 1 12-17-2010

Page 25: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

SW College Opt Count 68 33 8 2 2 35 148

Row % 45.9% 22.3% 5.4% 1.4% 1.4% 23.6% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 651 348 214 19 11 299 1542

Row % 42.2% 22.6% 13.9% 1.2% 0.7% 19.4% 100.0%

Northwest Spring Branch Campus - NWCount 3678 2294 2025 179 91 3027 11294

Row % 32.6% 20.3% 17.9% 1.6% 0.8% 26.8% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 2 2 4

Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Westgate Ctr Count 1962 1203 1117 76 66 1767 6191

Row % 31.7% 19.4% 18.0% 1.2% 1.1% 28.5% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 13 8 3 1 25

Row % 52.0% 32.0% 12.0% 4.0% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 2458 1612 1019 76 43 1147 6355

Row % 38.7% 25.4% 16.0% 1.2% 0.7% 18.0% 100.0%

Office City SE Count 88 32 25 4 2 17 168

Row % 52.4% 19.0% 14.9% 2.4% 1.2% 10.1% 100.0%

Felix Fraga Academic CampusCount 433 321 234 23 11 288 1310

Row % 33.1% 24.5% 17.9% 1.8% 0.8% 22.0% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 382 295 119 28 5 58 887

Row % 43.1% 33.3% 13.4% 3.2% 0.6% 6.5% 100.0%

SW Dual Credit Count 4 3 4 14 25

Row % 16.0% 12.0% 16.0% 56.0% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1474 931 820 89 64 782 4160

Row % 35.4% 22.4% 19.7% 2.1% 1.5% 18.8% 100.0%

Alief Cont. Ed. Count 71 75 41 7 7 79 280

Row % 25.4% 26.8% 14.6% 2.5% 2.5% 28.2% 100.0%

Fall2010_library_means.xls 2 12-17-2010

Page 26: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2010

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Stafford Ctr Count 4089 2512 1901 179 77 2272 11030

Row % 37.1% 22.8% 17.2% 1.6% 0.7% 20.6% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 557 315 226 12 13 283 1406

Row % 39.6% 22.4% 16.1% 0.9% 0.9% 20.1% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 2655 1647 1143 101 51 1793 7390

Row % 35.9% 22.3% 15.5% 1.4% 0.7% 24.3% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-SW Count 3 4 3 1 1 12

Row % 25.0% 33.3% 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 100.0%

Fall2010_library_means.xls 3 12-17-2010

Page 27: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ANTH Central

N 97 97 92 101 101 101 101 100 99 93 99 22 24 101 101 Mean 1.10 1.06 1.12 1.35 1.34 1.31 1.50 1.25 1.28 1.48 1.46 1.59 1.50 1.39 1.45

Northeast

N 41 38 41 44 44 44 44 44 42 41 43 9 8 44 44 Mean 1.17 1.29 1.12 1.27 1.50 1.36 1.45 1.39 1.69 1.83 1.49 1.33 1.38 1.48 1.50

Northwest

N 94 93 90 94 94 94 94 94 88 91 89 19 18 92 91 Mean 1.05 1.11 1.13 1.53 1.55 1.59 1.88 1.36 1.64 1.73 1.71 1.74 1.72 1.58 1.75

Southeast

N 23 23 22 23 22 23 23 23 22 23 23 8 8 23 23 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.09 1.26 1.18 1.26 1.43 1.17 1.23 2.13 1.35 2.25 2.00 1.22 1.35

Southwest

N 76 70 71 77 77 77 76 77 74 72 77 17 19 77 77 Mean 1.05 1.21 1.14 1.35 1.43 1.43 1.51 1.31 1.39 1.58 1.66 2.12 2.05 1.61 1.60

N 331 321 316 339 338 339 338 338 325 320 331 75 77 337 336 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.13 1.38 1.43 1.42 1.60 1.31 1.45 1.67 1.57 1.79 1.73 1.49 1.56

ARAB Northwest

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 5 5 16 15 Mean 1.13 1.19 1.00 1.38 2.00 1.50 1.88 1.44 1.80 1.87 1.50 1.20 1.40 1.38 2.00

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 5 5 16 15 Mean 1.13 1.19 1.00 1.38 2.00 1.50 1.88 1.44 1.80 1.87 1.50 1.20 1.40 1.38 2.00

ARTS Central

N 729 582 694 687 744 741 724 739 716 701 727 405 391 740 732 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.15 1.38 1.37 1.30 1.51 1.28 1.41 1.54 1.46 1.41 1.43 1.40 1.41

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 1 12/17/2010

Page 28: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ARTS Northeast

N 309 275 297 302 314 311 308 313 302 282 308 115 114 308 306 Mean 1.05 1.16 1.15 1.37 1.37 1.33 1.49 1.36 1.48 1.88 1.47 1.72 1.88 1.48 1.46

Northwest

N 415 350 402 398 426 427 421 425 414 407 415 120 119 422 422 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.15 1.34 1.37 1.31 1.52 1.25 1.36 1.72 1.44 1.42 1.50 1.42 1.45

Southeast

N 235 209 228 229 238 238 236 239 236 231 235 79 78 239 232 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.15 1.50 1.45 1.43 1.62 1.30 1.45 2.00 1.60 1.82 1.77 1.54 1.58

Southwest

N 774 651 742 728 793 789 775 793 765 750 773 331 317 793 784 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.18 1.52 1.48 1.39 1.62 1.34 1.45 1.81 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.50 1.54

N 2462 2067 2363 2344 2515 2506 2464 2509 2433 2371 2458 1050 1019 2502 2476 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.16 1.43 1.41 1.35 1.55 1.31 1.43 1.74 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.46 1.48

ASTR Central

N 13 12 13 12 13 13 12 13 12 12 13 9 9 12 12 Mean 1.15 1.25 1.31 1.75 1.77 1.77 1.67 1.77 1.83 1.58 1.92 1.78 1.67 1.83 1.75

Northwest

N 19 19 17 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 8 6 19 18 Mean 1.16 1.37 1.29 1.68 1.53 1.42 1.63 1.37 1.42 1.53 1.56 2.00 2.33 1.53 1.39

Southeast

N 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 4 4 13 13 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.17 1.46 1.54 1.31 1.69 1.15 1.23 1.33 1.38 1.00 1.00 1.54 1.46

Southwest

N 34 34 32 35 35 35 35 35 34 33 34 6 6 35 35 Mean 1.24 1.44 1.25 1.69 2.11 1.83 2.17 1.29 1.50 1.79 1.79 1.83 2.00 1.74 1.94

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 2 12/17/2010

Page 29: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 79 78 74 79 80 80 79 80 78 76 78 27 25 79 78 Mean 1.16 1.33 1.26 1.66 1.83 1.64 1.89 1.36 1.49 1.62 1.69 1.74 1.80 1.67 1.71

BCIS Central

N 136 131 127 135 136 136 136 136 135 130 129 89 92 138 136 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.11 1.44 1.50 1.36 1.45 1.35 1.44 1.67 1.56 1.62 1.55 1.49 1.51

Northeast

N 49 48 47 52 52 52 51 52 51 52 51 34 36 51 51 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.15 1.29 1.27 1.21 1.25 1.15 1.20 1.44 1.47 1.50 1.44 1.45 1.35

Northwest

N 179 173 170 183 183 183 183 181 173 176 179 86 88 178 179 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.24 1.52 1.80 1.47 1.66 1.48 1.57 1.71 1.70 1.66 1.70 1.70 1.79

Southeast

N 32 33 33 34 34 34 34 34 32 32 34 20 20 32 32 Mean 1.22 1.18 1.21 1.47 1.56 1.47 1.50 1.47 1.78 1.91 1.74 1.80 1.85 1.59 1.59

Southwest

N 160 158 155 161 161 161 161 160 159 154 160 97 100 158 160 Mean 1.10 1.19 1.17 1.45 1.55 1.38 1.57 1.42 1.42 1.71 1.51 1.62 1.59 1.58 1.62

N 556 543 532 565 566 566 565 563 550 544 553 326 336 557 558 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.18 1.46 1.59 1.39 1.54 1.40 1.47 1.69 1.59 1.63 1.61 1.58 1.62

BIOL Central

N 809 799 776 827 827 820 826 822 787 790 818 682 683 822 818 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.20 1.56 1.77 1.51 1.78 1.37 1.57 1.82 1.60 1.45 1.54 1.67 1.79

Coleman

N 294 291 290 294 293 292 293 296 288 283 296 287 291 296 290 Mean 1.04 1.08 1.13 1.33 1.50 1.31 1.54 1.20 1.30 1.63 1.43 1.46 1.49 1.33 1.32

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 3 12/17/2010

Page 30: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BIOL Northeast

N 891 865 842 909 908 903 908 907 879 868 892 846 848 903 898 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.19 1.40 1.51 1.38 1.52 1.28 1.46 1.69 1.48 1.39 1.40 1.48 1.51

Northwest

N 1232 1207 1159 1238 1239 1221 1233 1236 1168 1189 1222 1118 1123 1233 1236 Mean 1.14 1.16 1.25 1.58 1.82 1.50 1.81 1.48 1.71 1.84 1.67 1.53 1.56 1.65 1.82

Southeast

N 705 686 669 713 710 707 704 709 688 674 700 633 631 708 701 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.22 1.51 1.62 1.44 1.69 1.36 1.52 1.90 1.57 1.42 1.43 1.52 1.63

Southwest

N 1478 1466 1422 1499 1495 1477 1491 1491 1449 1434 1485 1340 1351 1499 1487 Mean 1.19 1.13 1.31 1.76 2.02 1.69 1.96 1.58 1.77 1.97 1.89 1.69 1.75 1.87 2.14

N 5409 5314 5158 5480 5472 5420 5455 5461 5259 5238 5413 4906 4927 5461 5430 Mean 1.12 1.12 1.24 1.57 1.77 1.52 1.77 1.43 1.61 1.84 1.66 1.52 1.56 1.65 1.80

CHEM Central

N 478 468 432 490 490 484 487 487 475 466 482 472 468 489 482 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.25 1.46 1.94 1.51 1.72 1.44 1.60 1.71 1.69 1.42 1.71 1.74 1.82

Northeast

N 148 147 136 150 150 150 147 148 143 142 150 123 123 149 150 Mean 1.21 1.22 1.24 1.67 2.00 1.66 1.86 1.55 1.72 2.04 1.95 1.63 1.71 1.83 2.02

Northwest

N 584 577 554 592 591 592 587 590 552 571 586 569 567 589 585 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.20 1.47 1.77 1.44 1.76 1.42 1.49 1.74 1.58 1.39 1.55 1.65 1.77

Southeast

N 193 192 184 195 194 194 194 194 189 185 194 193 193 194 193 Mean 1.11 1.27 1.28 1.47 1.99 1.54 1.76 1.42 1.72 1.77 1.78 1.46 1.70 1.62 1.78

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 4 12/17/2010

Page 31: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CHEM Southwest

N 784 753 761 795 797 792 789 797 780 770 790 751 745 799 788 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.23 1.55 1.77 1.57 1.78 1.44 1.66 1.81 1.72 1.38 1.56 1.71 1.79

N 2187 2137 2067 2222 2222 2212 2204 2216 2139 2134 2202 2108 2096 2220 2198 Mean 1.10 1.20 1.23 1.51 1.84 1.52 1.77 1.44 1.61 1.78 1.70 1.42 1.61 1.70 1.80

CHIN Central

N 11 12 12 11 11 11 11 11 9 10 11 4 4 12 12 Mean 1.36 1.08 1.42 1.45 2.55 1.73 2.00 1.64 2.44 2.20 2.27 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.67

Southeast

N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 12 4 4 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.42 1.33 2.00 1.25 1.75 1.17 1.58 1.40 1.58 3.00 2.00 1.08 2.00

Southwest

N 15 15 15 17 17 17 17 17 15 17 16 3 3 17 17 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.13 1.35 1.59 1.29 1.47 1.18 1.40 1.76 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.35 1.65

N 38 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 36 37 39 11 11 41 41 Mean 1.16 1.03 1.31 1.38 1.98 1.40 1.70 1.30 1.72 1.78 1.79 2.36 1.91 1.54 2.05

COMM Central

N 70 61 69 65 70 70 70 68 65 65 69 32 31 69 68 Mean 1.10 1.26 1.16 1.42 1.43 1.29 1.54 1.38 1.52 1.82 1.48 1.66 1.52 1.41 1.43

Northwest

N 41 41 36 41 42 42 42 42 36 41 42 15 15 42 42 Mean 1.27 1.12 1.42 1.56 1.98 1.57 1.98 1.62 1.56 2.10 1.67 1.60 1.73 1.45 2.00

Southwest

N 43 38 43 44 44 45 43 45 45 45 45 25 26 45 44 Mean 1.12 1.47 1.26 1.77 1.73 1.53 1.58 1.47 1.60 1.58 1.78 1.68 1.88 1.44 1.68

N 154 140 148 150 156 157 155 155 146 151 156 72 72 156 154

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 5 12/17/2010

Page 32: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.15 1.28 1.25 1.56 1.66 1.43 1.67 1.47 1.55 1.82 1.62 1.65 1.69 1.43 1.66

COSC Central

N 50 50 49 51 51 50 50 51 49 46 50 25 30 50 50 Mean 1.24 1.22 1.29 1.59 1.84 1.48 1.60 1.59 1.63 1.78 1.88 1.64 1.77 1.80 1.88

Northwest

N 49 47 44 48 51 48 47 51 49 48 48 24 29 48 48 Mean 1.06 1.04 1.18 1.33 1.47 1.29 1.49 1.27 1.39 1.35 1.38 1.58 1.52 1.38 1.42

Southeast

N 14 14 6 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 13 9 12 15 15 Mean 1.43 1.29 2.50 2.20 2.93 2.20 2.73 1.80 2.79 2.64 2.92 3.00 2.25 2.60 3.33

Southwest

N 66 66 63 66 65 66 64 66 61 63 64 35 39 65 63 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.21 1.35 1.55 1.32 1.81 1.26 1.31 1.51 1.66 1.51 1.36 1.45 1.38

N 179 177 162 180 182 179 176 183 173 171 175 93 110 178 176 Mean 1.13 1.12 1.27 1.48 1.73 1.43 1.74 1.40 1.54 1.63 1.74 1.71 1.61 1.62 1.70

CRIJ Central

N 44 44 39 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 40 13 11 43 43 Mean 1.05 1.16 1.13 1.23 1.36 1.23 1.48 1.32 1.32 1.48 1.33 1.31 1.45 1.26 1.35

Northeast

N 73 73 65 73 73 73 71 72 72 67 73 19 19 73 73 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.19 1.22 1.19 1.35 1.19 1.19 2.07 1.38 1.47 1.53 1.29 1.23

Northwest

N 68 65 61 69 69 68 69 69 65 66 69 14 14 69 69 Mean 1.01 1.11 1.11 1.20 1.22 1.24 1.42 1.26 1.32 1.67 1.35 1.79 1.93 1.45 1.30

Southeast

N 90 90 84 92 92 92 92 91 92 90 92 21 21 91 91

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 6 12/17/2010

Page 33: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.13 1.03 1.15 1.29 1.35 1.26 1.34 1.35 1.42 1.64 1.45 1.81 1.86 1.26 1.35

CRIJ Southwest

N 135 134 131 137 137 137 136 137 132 132 136 43 41 135 133 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.18 1.25 1.29 1.28 1.38 1.19 1.33 1.71 1.44 1.42 1.49 1.27 1.26

N 410 406 380 415 415 414 412 413 405 399 410 110 106 411 409 Mean 1.05 1.07 1.16 1.24 1.29 1.25 1.38 1.25 1.32 1.72 1.40 1.54 1.62 1.30 1.29

DANC Central

N 142 72 134 133 145 145 139 145 143 128 139 66 60 143 141 Mean 1.04 1.26 1.11 1.32 1.31 1.26 1.37 1.27 1.31 1.60 1.39 1.29 1.35 1.30 1.33

Northwest

N 92 29 76 69 93 91 84 91 89 80 77 34 33 93 93 Mean 1.05 1.41 1.11 1.32 1.24 1.21 1.42 1.22 1.29 1.50 1.45 1.29 1.33 1.24 1.26

N 234 101 210 202 238 236 223 236 232 208 216 100 93 236 234 Mean 1.05 1.31 1.11 1.32 1.28 1.24 1.39 1.25 1.31 1.56 1.41 1.29 1.34 1.28 1.30

DRAM Central

N 104 86 101 107 107 107 106 107 104 105 99 46 47 106 105 Mean 1.01 1.07 1.04 1.25 1.21 1.22 1.28 1.24 1.34 1.50 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.16 1.21

Northeast

N 34 34 33 34 34 34 34 33 34 30 34 13 13 34 34 Mean 1.06 1.18 1.52 1.38 1.65 1.65 1.68 1.73 1.94 2.67 2.03 2.15 2.31 2.06 1.79

Northwest

N 53 31 48 48 51 52 49 51 52 47 48 25 25 51 51 Mean 1.06 1.06 1.10 1.27 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.10 1.15 1.36 1.31 1.36 1.32 1.06 1.04

Southeast

N 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 20 24 7 7 24 24 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.17 1.63 1.79 1.71 1.67 1.58 1.71 2.15 1.46 2.29 2.14 1.54 1.67

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 7 12/17/2010

Page 34: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DRAM Southwest

N 101 90 96 104 105 105 104 105 102 99 103 39 36 104 104 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.20 1.39 1.44 1.34 1.61 1.39 1.42 1.94 1.69 1.49 1.44 1.54 1.60

N 316 265 302 317 321 322 317 320 316 301 308 130 128 319 318 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.16 1.34 1.36 1.33 1.44 1.34 1.43 1.78 1.53 1.49 1.47 1.39 1.41

ECON Central

N 322 314 288 328 325 325 318 325 309 302 316 95 89 328 327 Mean 1.16 1.13 1.32 1.57 1.91 1.51 1.84 1.50 1.72 1.94 1.80 1.82 1.71 1.63 1.87

Northeast

N 74 72 72 74 74 74 73 75 73 74 73 25 26 74 73 Mean 1.11 1.31 1.33 1.80 2.00 1.74 1.89 1.69 1.88 1.82 1.88 1.76 1.73 1.64 1.86

Northwest

N 324 315 297 330 331 326 329 327 311 323 324 84 86 326 327 Mean 1.12 1.25 1.25 1.62 1.81 1.62 1.96 1.42 1.61 1.80 1.67 1.93 1.93 1.66 1.84

Southeast

N 87 86 83 88 88 87 89 88 86 87 85 21 20 89 87 Mean 1.03 1.20 1.27 1.57 1.74 1.55 1.72 1.52 1.64 1.97 1.64 1.76 1.65 1.63 1.77

Southwest

N 530 507 493 543 540 537 538 537 524 518 533 178 177 535 534 Mean 1.25 1.44 1.45 1.78 1.88 1.80 2.04 1.60 1.79 1.98 1.96 1.79 1.86 1.77 2.11

N 1337 1294 1233 1363 1358 1349 1347 1352 1303 1304 1331 403 398 1352 1348 Mean 1.18 1.30 1.35 1.68 1.87 1.67 1.94 1.53 1.73 1.92 1.83 1.82 1.82 1.69 1.95

EDUC Central

N 83 82 82 83 84 84 84 84 82 80 82 45 44 83 84 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.21 1.46 1.32 1.36 1.64 1.23 1.43 1.78 1.63 1.64 1.64 1.40 1.48

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 8 12/17/2010

Page 35: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

EDUC Northeast

N 66 65 63 67 67 67 67 67 65 64 66 21 22 67 67 Mean 1.08 1.06 1.19 1.34 1.54 1.48 1.51 1.33 1.52 1.72 1.68 1.76 1.77 1.49 1.48

Northwest

N 81 81 80 79 83 83 83 83 82 78 82 22 21 83 83 Mean 1.11 1.17 1.21 1.34 1.29 1.27 1.43 1.14 1.30 1.51 1.38 1.77 1.81 1.30 1.31

Southeast

N 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 16 17 27 27 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.22 1.00 1.19 1.18 1.04 1.07

Southwest

N 116 114 114 112 116 115 116 116 110 104 115 26 26 115 114 Mean 1.05 1.09 1.12 1.35 1.30 1.29 1.59 1.27 1.40 1.79 1.50 1.42 1.58 1.31 1.44

N 372 368 365 368 377 376 377 377 366 353 372 130 130 375 375 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.17 1.35 1.33 1.31 1.51 1.23 1.38 1.67 1.50 1.58 1.62 1.34 1.40

ENGD Central

N 486 483 469 493 495 496 497 494 487 480 496 300 301 497 490 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.22 1.51 1.43 1.41 1.52 1.37 1.46 1.84 1.53 1.64 1.60 1.43 1.48

Northeast

N 324 325 303 332 334 332 329 329 330 321 323 165 162 331 328 Mean 1.10 1.18 1.24 1.48 1.57 1.48 1.67 1.51 1.68 1.94 1.67 1.82 1.83 1.49 1.60

Northwest

N 349 346 335 346 353 356 350 354 349 342 352 173 173 353 348 Mean 1.21 1.16 1.34 1.76 1.80 1.63 1.80 1.59 1.71 2.08 1.94 1.91 1.85 1.76 1.92

Southeast

N 335 327 322 331 340 340 335 340 332 326 333 219 216 338 336 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.25 1.54 1.49 1.46 1.62 1.35 1.55 1.79 1.55 1.75 1.75 1.56 1.57

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 9 12/17/2010

Page 36: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGD Southwest

N 670 664 656 679 681 682 673 681 666 654 681 460 466 682 672 Mean 1.11 1.13 1.21 1.46 1.47 1.42 1.60 1.42 1.50 1.86 1.58 1.64 1.64 1.49 1.53

N 2164 2145 2085 2181 2203 2206 2184 2198 2164 2123 2185 1317 1318 2201 2174 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.24 1.53 1.53 1.47 1.63 1.44 1.56 1.89 1.64 1.72 1.70 1.53 1.60

ENGF Central

N 279 280 269 286 284 284 281 287 283 279 281 199 201 272 268 Mean 1.27 1.38 1.45 1.81 1.94 1.82 1.93 1.77 1.85 2.05 1.89 1.96 1.99 1.98 2.12

Northeast

N 30 29 29 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 15 14 32 32 Mean 1.30 1.24 1.38 1.50 1.47 1.53 1.72 1.53 1.69 1.59 1.56 1.60 1.64 1.75 1.78

Northwest

N 91 89 84 95 94 92 93 91 93 92 94 70 67 94 90 Mean 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.67 1.55 1.63 1.78 1.44 1.44 1.63 1.66 1.63 1.67 1.61 1.77

Southeast

N 37 36 33 37 37 36 37 37 35 36 35 28 28 37 36 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.48 1.59 1.38 1.53 1.62 1.51 1.54 1.75 1.77 1.79 1.71 1.57 1.44

Southwest

N 463 458 450 486 485 483 475 475 474 474 473 261 250 478 469 Mean 1.25 1.31 1.33 1.78 1.79 1.77 1.85 1.74 1.80 2.01 1.85 2.00 2.06 1.87 2.01

N 900 892 865 936 932 927 918 922 917 913 915 573 560 913 895 Mean 1.25 1.32 1.37 1.76 1.79 1.76 1.85 1.70 1.76 1.96 1.83 1.92 1.96 1.86 1.99

ENGL Central

N 1375 1348 1299 1334 1400 1404 1377 1399 1355 1310 1388 502 495 1389 1387 Mean 1.12 1.14 1.20 1.50 1.49 1.43 1.59 1.36 1.49 1.76 1.64 1.66 1.69 1.48 1.57

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 10 12/17/2010

Page 37: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGL Northeast

N 779 776 730 764 793 791 789 785 777 751 782 250 247 786 787 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.19 1.39 1.36 1.33 1.50 1.31 1.45 1.74 1.49 1.54 1.59 1.40 1.44

Northwest

N 1244 1219 1176 1221 1261 1259 1245 1257 1221 1198 1241 353 343 1250 1235 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.21 1.54 1.58 1.47 1.77 1.47 1.58 1.88 1.76 1.78 1.81 1.59 1.73

Southeast

N 722 691 677 697 726 728 716 727 705 682 710 215 208 725 719 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.22 1.49 1.53 1.44 1.62 1.37 1.57 1.95 1.66 1.76 1.75 1.54 1.65

Southwest

N 2242 2082 2131 2190 2289 2283 2261 2276 2219 2166 2247 802 791 2275 2259 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.21 1.50 1.54 1.43 1.73 1.41 1.53 1.90 1.68 1.70 1.73 1.58 1.70

N 6362 6116 6013 6206 6469 6465 6388 6444 6277 6107 6368 2122 2084 6425 6387 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.49 1.51 1.43 1.67 1.39 1.52 1.85 1.66 1.69 1.72 1.53 1.64

ENGR Central

N 26 27 24 28 28 28 28 28 24 27 26 7 6 28 28 Mean 1.12 1.26 1.71 1.89 2.14 2.00 2.14 1.96 2.13 2.04 2.27 1.86 2.17 1.61 2.39

Northeast

N 8 10 11 9 12 9 8 12 11 7 8 6 5 12 12 Mean 2.13 1.40 1.73 2.44 2.33 2.11 2.13 1.33 1.73 2.57 2.38 1.50 2.20 2.17 2.42

Northwest

N 92 90 81 92 92 92 92 92 89 90 91 39 37 92 91 Mean 1.17 1.21 1.28 1.46 1.67 1.46 1.63 1.37 1.57 1.67 1.56 1.59 1.68 1.47 1.66

Southeast

N 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 30 30 31 6 6 31 31 Mean 1.16 1.10 1.39 1.39 2.19 1.42 1.90 1.48 1.70 1.80 2.06 3.00 3.00 1.68 1.84

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 11 12/17/2010

Page 38: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGR Southwest

N 137 135 123 136 138 135 134 139 133 133 133 59 57 139 136 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.32 1.54 1.90 1.64 1.84 1.35 1.76 1.89 1.81 1.86 1.93 1.45 1.79

N 294 293 270 296 301 295 292 302 287 287 289 117 111 302 298 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.37 1.56 1.90 1.61 1.82 1.42 1.72 1.84 1.82 1.81 1.93 1.52 1.84

ENVR Central

N 73 70 69 73 74 74 73 74 70 67 72 42 42 73 74 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.17 1.55 1.74 1.51 1.71 1.36 1.54 1.72 1.47 1.62 1.50 1.66 1.64

Northwest

N 75 69 71 79 78 79 79 79 77 77 79 26 25 79 79 Mean 1.03 1.19 1.03 1.29 1.28 1.33 1.46 1.28 1.48 1.56 1.35 1.62 1.68 1.56 1.34

Southeast

N 31 28 28 30 32 32 30 32 31 28 29 15 14 32 32 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.04 1.20 1.09 1.16 1.27 1.09 1.10 1.93 1.38 1.33 1.36 1.22 1.13

Southwest

N 197 190 189 195 199 197 193 197 185 184 193 64 62 195 195 Mean 1.09 1.15 1.17 1.57 1.65 1.49 1.67 1.42 1.60 1.85 1.74 1.64 1.60 1.70 1.66

N 376 357 357 377 383 382 375 382 363 356 373 147 143 379 380 Mean 1.06 1.17 1.13 1.48 1.55 1.43 1.60 1.35 1.52 1.77 1.58 1.60 1.56 1.62 1.54

ESOL Central

N 761 758 741 794 796 785 789 792 790 779 783 595 582 794 781 Mean 1.15 1.16 1.26 1.49 1.55 1.54 1.57 1.51 1.56 1.63 1.60 1.66 1.70 1.60 1.64

Northeast

N 355 348 336 360 364 361 363 363 359 360 352 292 299 362 362 Mean 1.16 1.15 1.26 1.38 1.38 1.41 1.46 1.40 1.39 1.45 1.48 1.57 1.60 1.53 1.57

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 12 12/17/2010

Page 39: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ESOL Northwest

N 506 505 485 519 521 518 517 520 519 520 511 421 416 521 522 Mean 1.25 1.28 1.39 1.64 1.76 1.71 1.74 1.61 1.69 1.76 1.79 1.84 1.83 1.75 1.84

Southeast

N 502 497 487 518 517 515 514 517 517 508 517 407 449 514 513 Mean 1.23 1.29 1.27 1.56 1.49 1.58 1.60 1.47 1.48 1.60 1.58 1.67 1.70 1.59 1.59

Southwest

N 2408 2359 2349 2464 2467 2463 2462 2462 2459 2442 2435 760 738 2419 2401 Mean 1.15 1.17 1.23 1.49 1.51 1.55 1.56 1.43 1.48 1.55 1.52 1.72 1.75 1.56 1.61

N 4532 4467 4398 4655 4665 4642 4645 4654 4644 4609 4598 2475 2484 4610 4579 Mean 1.17 1.19 1.26 1.50 1.53 1.56 1.58 1.46 1.51 1.58 1.57 1.70 1.73 1.59 1.64

FREN Central

N 51 51 50 52 52 52 50 52 46 49 50 22 24 51 51 Mean 1.12 1.08 1.04 1.23 1.40 1.25 1.40 1.35 1.39 1.47 1.50 1.59 1.54 1.37 1.35

Northeast

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 7 6 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.07 1.20 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.27 1.20 1.14 1.17 1.13 1.20

Northwest

N 32 30 31 32 32 31 32 32 31 30 31 8 7 32 32 Mean 1.13 1.10 1.10 1.38 1.72 1.35 1.47 1.34 1.39 1.57 1.52 1.75 2.14 1.84 1.72

Southwest

N 37 37 37 38 37 38 38 38 34 36 38 9 10 37 37 Mean 1.11 1.03 1.08 1.29 1.43 1.37 1.55 1.34 1.35 1.58 1.37 1.22 1.20 1.27 1.46

N 135 133 133 137 136 136 135 137 126 130 134 46 47 135 135 Mean 1.10 1.06 1.06 1.28 1.45 1.30 1.43 1.32 1.35 1.50 1.43 1.48 1.51 1.43 1.45

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 13 12/17/2010

Page 40: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GEOG Central

N 16 16 14 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 11 11 16 16 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.29 1.38 1.44 1.53 1.47 1.38 1.69 1.81 1.63 1.45 1.36 1.81 1.69

Northeast

N 20 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 20 8 8 20 20 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.05 1.50 1.45 1.30 1.80 1.30 1.58 2.20 1.65 1.50 1.50 1.45 1.40

Northwest

N 117 119 118 122 122 122 121 120 115 118 121 31 30 121 119 Mean 1.02 1.10 1.14 1.48 1.33 1.28 1.76 1.17 1.34 1.61 1.45 1.81 1.83 1.52 1.42

Southeast

N 28 28 28 30 30 30 28 30 29 28 29 11 10 30 30 Mean 1.25 1.18 1.32 1.63 2.20 1.60 2.04 1.33 1.79 2.07 1.72 2.09 2.10 1.97 2.20

Southwest

N 58 56 54 58 58 57 57 58 54 58 58 21 20 58 58 Mean 1.10 1.21 1.19 1.50 1.66 1.49 1.68 1.48 1.61 1.74 1.67 2.19 2.30 1.55 1.66

N 239 237 234 246 246 244 241 244 233 240 244 82 79 245 243 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.17 1.50 1.53 1.39 1.76 1.29 1.50 1.76 1.57 1.87 1.89 1.60 1.59

GEOL Central

N 61 57 58 61 61 60 60 60 58 60 58 55 54 61 61 Mean 1.23 1.25 1.31 1.70 1.90 1.58 1.92 1.30 1.47 1.68 1.62 1.49 1.41 1.67 1.80

Northwest

N 161 149 151 162 161 159 159 161 155 155 159 136 141 162 161 Mean 1.07 1.21 1.17 1.25 1.36 1.33 1.53 1.29 1.38 1.59 1.47 1.46 1.35 1.48 1.45

Southeast

N 43 40 42 43 43 42 43 43 40 36 41 33 33 43 43 Mean 1.56 1.33 1.45 1.86 1.98 1.67 2.07 1.65 1.85 2.31 2.12 1.85 2.00 2.07 1.93

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 14 12/17/2010

Page 41: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GEOL Southwest

N 235 235 221 237 238 234 236 236 226 224 231 189 198 237 232 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.19 1.54 1.55 1.41 1.67 1.29 1.42 1.82 1.58 1.50 1.49 1.64 1.60

N 500 481 472 503 503 495 498 500 479 475 489 413 426 503 497 Mean 1.16 1.20 1.22 1.49 1.57 1.42 1.69 1.32 1.45 1.76 1.60 1.51 1.47 1.63 1.61

GERM Central

N 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 16 2 3 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.19 1.31 1.31 1.50 1.31 1.69 1.27 1.31 1.00 1.67 1.25 1.31

N 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 16 2 3 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.19 1.31 1.31 1.50 1.31 1.69 1.27 1.31 1.00 1.67 1.25 1.31

GOVT Central

N 632 617 581 636 639 618 628 629 603 591 610 216 212 639 632 Mean 1.18 1.21 1.35 1.72 1.86 1.65 1.89 1.49 1.74 2.00 1.78 1.85 1.87 1.79 1.95

Northeast

N 456 429 409 470 471 467 470 471 454 446 461 119 113 466 463 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.16 1.42 1.54 1.40 1.53 1.41 1.50 1.74 1.55 1.61 1.68 1.47 1.51

Northwest

N 970 959 919 979 979 971 967 975 942 941 962 257 251 960 961 Mean 1.07 1.18 1.26 1.55 1.58 1.50 1.82 1.38 1.52 1.84 1.66 1.73 1.73 1.63 1.74

Southeast

N 370 366 355 376 375 372 372 372 362 364 366 97 92 374 373 Mean 1.02 1.09 1.16 1.26 1.32 1.28 1.51 1.19 1.36 1.83 1.47 1.65 1.70 1.41 1.34

Southwest

N 1664 1626 1561 1680 1687 1678 1664 1682 1619 1597 1647 511 470 1673 1658 Mean 1.07 1.18 1.21 1.44 1.45 1.42 1.63 1.32 1.49 1.74 1.54 1.76 1.78 1.49 1.50

N 4092 3997 3825 4141 4151 4106 4101 4129 3980 3939 4046 1200 1138 4112 4087

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 15 12/17/2010

Page 42: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.09 1.17 1.23 1.49 1.54 1.46 1.69 1.36 1.52 1.81 1.60 1.74 1.77 1.56 1.61

GUST Central

N 1084 1068 1026 1097 1100 1097 1093 1093 1080 1048 1077 672 675 1093 1085 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.28 1.41 1.38 1.41 1.59 1.38 1.53 1.91 1.64 1.67 1.67 1.49 1.49

Northeast

N 670 662 647 678 681 675 674 671 668 645 670 412 409 680 667 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.27 1.51 1.56 1.51 1.70 1.50 1.59 1.89 1.70 1.76 1.72 1.50 1.64

Northwest

N 1040 1030 985 1068 1073 1070 1058 1064 1041 1031 1057 539 534 1066 1059 Mean 1.13 1.12 1.25 1.40 1.45 1.47 1.58 1.36 1.47 1.71 1.62 1.61 1.66 1.45 1.47

Southeast

N 598 595 577 607 609 606 606 606 597 572 598 353 356 606 600 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.23 1.44 1.41 1.44 1.55 1.30 1.45 1.85 1.63 1.78 1.72 1.39 1.40

Southwest

N 1883 1858 1810 1921 1928 1917 1911 1919 1898 1845 1893 1264 1260 1926 1896 Mean 1.14 1.12 1.27 1.49 1.53 1.49 1.63 1.46 1.55 1.88 1.70 1.70 1.71 1.53 1.59

N 5275 5213 5045 5371 5391 5365 5342 5353 5284 5141 5295 3240 3234 5371 5307 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.26 1.45 1.48 1.47 1.61 1.41 1.52 1.85 1.66 1.69 1.70 1.49 1.53

HIST Central

N 897 879 821 908 911 898 903 906 863 864 889 296 286 901 900 Mean 1.12 1.27 1.31 1.45 1.48 1.44 1.61 1.34 1.50 1.74 1.58 1.59 1.65 1.61 1.60

Northeast

N 482 476 448 494 493 492 491 492 473 461 489 143 137 486 485 Mean 1.09 1.19 1.25 1.47 1.61 1.44 1.65 1.38 1.55 1.81 1.59 1.67 1.70 1.61 1.70

Northwest

N 1561 1525 1471 1569 1576 1560 1556 1566 1513 1483 1529 434 416 1552 1558

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 16 12/17/2010

Page 43: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.08 1.28 1.26 1.58 1.55 1.50 1.84 1.40 1.56 1.86 1.71 1.83 1.85 1.69 1.73

HIST Southeast

N 560 555 528 561 568 565 563 567 553 527 541 157 153 567 568 Mean 1.08 1.28 1.25 1.53 1.50 1.48 1.74 1.39 1.54 2.03 1.73 1.71 1.81 1.71 1.70

Southwest

N 1507 1421 1426 1535 1536 1523 1506 1531 1478 1457 1508 469 446 1515 1512 Mean 1.10 1.26 1.25 1.54 1.55 1.50 1.73 1.43 1.60 1.90 1.76 1.71 1.77 1.67 1.68

N 5007 4856 4694 5067 5084 5038 5019 5062 4880 4792 4956 1499 1438 5021 5023 Mean 1.10 1.27 1.26 1.53 1.54 1.48 1.74 1.40 1.56 1.86 1.69 1.72 1.77 1.66 1.68

HUMA Central

N 104 102 96 103 106 105 105 106 101 97 104 31 31 107 106 Mean 1.25 1.17 1.27 1.59 1.75 1.66 1.71 1.55 1.73 2.05 1.68 2.10 2.13 1.65 1.82

Northeast

N 43 38 42 39 45 45 43 45 44 44 44 11 10 46 46 Mean 1.12 1.29 1.10 1.41 1.49 1.44 1.51 1.27 1.32 1.86 1.59 1.64 1.80 1.35 1.43

Northwest

N 50 49 48 47 51 50 44 51 46 44 46 19 19 51 50 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.21 1.60 1.71 1.58 1.86 1.65 1.67 2.05 1.91 2.05 1.95 1.63 1.74

Southeast

N 48 49 46 49 49 49 47 49 45 42 45 14 14 46 47 Mean 1.25 1.14 1.22 1.51 1.76 1.69 1.83 1.80 1.89 2.00 1.96 2.07 2.07 1.65 2.00

Southwest

N 57 45 54 54 57 57 53 57 55 49 53 20 18 56 56 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.11 1.33 1.26 1.39 1.36 1.25 1.42 1.86 1.58 1.45 1.50 1.29 1.23

N 302 283 286 292 308 306 292 308 291 276 292 95 92 306 305 Mean 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.51 1.61 1.57 1.66 1.51 1.63 1.98 1.73 1.89 1.92 1.54 1.67

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 17 12/17/2010

Page 44: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

JAPN Central

N 28 28 28 29 29 29 27 29 25 25 28 10 13 29 28 Mean 1.29 1.14 1.21 1.66 1.93 1.52 1.63 1.55 1.80 1.64 1.75 1.50 1.69 1.83 1.89

Northwest

N 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 23 21 22 23 9 11 23 23 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.30 1.52 1.35 1.55 1.13 1.43 1.68 1.26 1.33 1.36 1.13 1.17

N 51 51 51 52 52 52 49 52 46 47 51 19 24 52 51 Mean 1.16 1.12 1.14 1.50 1.75 1.44 1.59 1.37 1.63 1.66 1.53 1.42 1.54 1.52 1.57

KORE Central

N 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 14 7 7 14 14 Mean 1.14 1.07 1.07 1.29 1.43 1.43 1.57 1.79 1.46 1.69 1.64 1.86 1.86 1.57 1.57

Northwest

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.63 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.71 1.63 1.38 1.63

N 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 21 22 14 15 22 22 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.32 1.50 1.45 1.73 1.68 1.57 1.62 1.50 1.79 1.73 1.50 1.59

MATD Central

N 927 914 872 956 959 952 952 950 914 894 938 539 576 950 950 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.26 1.54 1.84 1.51 1.73 1.58 1.71 1.99 1.79 1.82 1.81 1.80 1.95

Northeast

N 1046 1027 968 1056 1055 1049 1042 1051 1020 998 1034 465 486 1048 1041 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.27 1.37 1.58 1.36 1.61 1.32 1.52 1.86 1.65 1.67 1.64 1.54 1.52

Northwest

N 1523 1465 1433 1534 1531 1532 1530 1533 1489 1450 1498 733 745 1515 1505 Mean 1.05 1.12 1.19 1.29 1.40 1.29 1.51 1.26 1.39 1.70 1.50 1.56 1.53 1.47 1.45

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 18 12/17/2010

Page 45: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MATD Southeast

N 716 669 668 718 725 721 724 723 706 679 710 325 317 721 715 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.25 1.37 1.48 1.33 1.57 1.33 1.48 1.80 1.60 1.80 1.83 1.50 1.52

Southwest

N 2321 2243 2204 2365 2363 2368 2350 2346 2303 2221 2296 1258 1280 2348 2333 Mean 1.10 1.17 1.22 1.35 1.54 1.37 1.52 1.32 1.52 1.80 1.57 1.65 1.64 1.52 1.54

N 6533 6318 6145 6629 6633 6622 6598 6603 6432 6242 6476 3320 3404 6582 6544 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.23 1.37 1.55 1.36 1.57 1.35 1.51 1.81 1.60 1.68 1.66 1.55 1.58

MATH Central

N 739 727 636 760 757 759 753 755 708 723 737 226 221 749 749 Mean 1.18 1.16 1.41 1.60 2.00 1.59 1.87 1.57 1.84 1.91 1.93 1.96 2.05 1.93 2.08

Northeast

N 441 434 376 447 447 443 445 446 421 409 431 112 113 445 444 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.21 1.35 1.52 1.33 1.56 1.37 1.54 1.78 1.70 1.75 1.73 1.51 1.54

Northwest

N 1337 1306 1194 1362 1364 1352 1353 1361 1266 1292 1337 352 343 1344 1343 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.30 1.50 1.87 1.49 1.73 1.48 1.68 1.81 1.64 1.81 1.82 1.85 1.91

Southeast

N 564 553 505 573 572 572 571 570 557 533 563 168 162 567 567 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.23 1.41 1.60 1.38 1.65 1.29 1.51 1.86 1.53 1.78 1.81 1.58 1.58

Southwest

N 1939 1903 1790 1978 1976 1968 1963 1963 1893 1886 1929 654 657 1953 1950 Mean 1.09 1.17 1.24 1.38 1.60 1.40 1.62 1.40 1.61 1.71 1.57 1.72 1.73 1.60 1.67

N 5020 4923 4501 5120 5116 5094 5085 5095 4845 4843 4997 1512 1496 5058 5053 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.28 1.45 1.72 1.44 1.68 1.43 1.65 1.79 1.65 1.79 1.81 1.71 1.77

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 19 12/17/2010

Page 46: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MUAP Central

N 25 16 25 17 28 28 24 28 28 24 23 9 11 28 28 Mean 1.04 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.11 1.09 1.00 1.00

Northwest

N 47 32 51 42 56 56 46 56 51 39 42 13 14 56 55 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.12 1.11 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.12 1.26 1.14 1.15 1.14 1.07 1.05

Southwest

N 16 12 18 16 20 20 17 20 20 17 17 7 7 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.24 1.05 1.15 1.29 1.35 1.57 1.57 1.10 1.05

N 88 60 94 75 104 104 87 104 99 80 82 29 32 104 103 Mean 1.01 1.08 1.02 1.08 1.07 1.06 1.13 1.06 1.09 1.24 1.15 1.24 1.22 1.06 1.04

MUSI Central

N 276 263 257 277 289 281 273 285 277 268 276 119 119 286 285 Mean 1.03 1.11 1.15 1.19 1.22 1.21 1.38 1.22 1.34 1.54 1.36 1.37 1.35 1.30 1.29

Northeast

N 34 34 33 34 34 34 33 34 33 31 32 11 12 33 33 Mean 1.06 1.21 1.33 1.59 1.85 1.53 1.91 1.82 2.33 2.45 2.03 2.00 1.67 1.97 2.15

Northwest

N 296 244 278 282 311 309 301 310 293 287 298 120 127 304 304 Mean 1.07 1.15 1.16 1.33 1.38 1.29 1.44 1.26 1.40 1.51 1.43 1.42 1.37 1.36 1.38

Southeast

N 58 54 57 59 59 59 59 58 59 56 59 24 24 58 58 Mean 1.03 1.13 1.16 1.36 1.27 1.34 1.51 1.40 1.44 1.84 1.44 1.46 1.38 1.28 1.48

Southwest

N 175 168 166 174 173 173 170 174 167 170 166 61 59 173 172 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.12 1.28 1.31 1.32 1.42 1.16 1.37 1.64 1.39 1.41 1.44 1.40 1.34

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 20 12/17/2010

Page 47: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 839 763 791 826 866 856 836 861 829 812 831 335 341 854 852 Mean 1.05 1.13 1.15 1.29 1.32 1.28 1.44 1.26 1.41 1.60 1.42 1.42 1.39 1.37 1.38

PHED Central

N 159 83 145 137 162 155 157 163 157 142 140 92 85 163 162 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.18 1.45 1.27 1.33 1.41 1.32 1.37 1.88 1.51 1.37 1.41 1.26 1.25

Northwest

N 47 33 44 47 48 48 48 48 48 47 48 33 32 49 48 Mean 1.02 1.09 1.07 1.17 1.19 1.15 1.21 1.21 1.19 1.45 1.23 1.18 1.19 1.14 1.15

Southwest

N 95 59 78 78 101 95 95 100 96 81 83 53 48 97 99 Mean 1.06 1.34 1.14 1.28 1.16 1.34 1.22 1.07 1.22 1.64 1.41 1.23 1.38 1.19 1.14

N 301 175 267 262 311 298 300 311 301 270 271 178 165 309 309 Mean 1.04 1.21 1.15 1.35 1.22 1.30 1.32 1.22 1.29 1.73 1.43 1.29 1.36 1.22 1.20

PHIL Central

N 240 231 221 240 242 242 239 242 235 230 237 52 52 237 236 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.18 1.40 1.50 1.35 1.61 1.39 1.46 1.65 1.56 1.63 1.67 1.52 1.54

Northeast

N 105 95 101 105 105 105 104 105 102 102 104 29 28 105 104 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.08 1.11 1.19 1.15 1.18 1.09 1.32 1.61 1.31 1.34 1.29 1.24 1.15

Northwest

N 421 393 395 428 433 430 424 431 404 409 422 92 93 431 426 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.18 1.42 1.60 1.40 1.64 1.26 1.43 1.68 1.73 1.62 1.62 1.53 1.57

Southeast

N 56 55 57 57 57 57 57 57 56 52 56 11 10 57 57 Mean 1.02 1.07 1.05 1.25 1.33 1.23 1.47 1.21 1.48 1.98 1.32 1.64 1.70 1.44 1.37

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 21 12/17/2010

Page 48: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PHIL Southwest

N 177 169 153 178 180 179 179 179 175 163 179 31 30 177 177 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.18 1.26 1.45 1.30 1.49 1.18 1.26 1.52 1.39 1.68 1.70 1.46 1.51

N 999 943 927 1008 1017 1013 1003 1014 972 956 998 215 213 1007 1000 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.16 1.34 1.49 1.34 1.55 1.25 1.40 1.65 1.56 1.60 1.61 1.48 1.50

PHYS Central

N 183 176 150 182 186 185 180 186 171 176 181 125 125 186 185 Mean 1.25 1.31 1.61 1.83 2.42 1.81 2.09 1.90 2.09 2.02 2.28 2.05 2.24 2.26 2.58

Northwest

N 137 123 126 133 140 139 139 140 134 136 137 94 92 140 136 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.35 1.53 1.71 1.42 1.74 1.36 1.59 1.63 1.66 1.48 1.53 1.43 1.74

Southeast

N 62 62 56 65 65 65 65 65 63 63 63 49 50 64 64 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.23 1.37 1.69 1.49 1.58 1.31 1.48 1.68 1.51 1.59 1.54 1.63 1.53

Southwest

N 329 317 298 337 338 333 335 337 324 322 329 190 185 336 333 Mean 1.16 1.33 1.43 1.68 2.16 1.78 2.08 1.57 1.81 1.87 1.94 1.78 1.71 1.95 2.21

N 711 678 630 717 729 722 719 728 692 697 710 458 452 726 718 Mean 1.17 1.26 1.44 1.66 2.10 1.69 1.97 1.59 1.80 1.84 1.94 1.77 1.80 1.90 2.15

PSYC Central

N 567 557 529 581 580 580 576 579 565 550 574 237 235 579 576 Mean 1.06 1.07 1.16 1.32 1.28 1.27 1.51 1.20 1.33 1.64 1.38 1.50 1.52 1.37 1.34

Northeast

N 408 400 392 411 411 409 406 408 399 385 410 128 124 409 405 Mean 1.06 1.12 1.14 1.33 1.35 1.30 1.48 1.23 1.41 1.86 1.45 1.52 1.60 1.38 1.35

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 22 12/17/2010

Page 49: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PSYC Northwest

N 1045 1030 990 1061 1058 1055 1058 1054 1010 1008 1042 288 272 1054 1049 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.19 1.43 1.54 1.45 1.67 1.33 1.46 1.79 1.64 1.67 1.72 1.59 1.58

Southeast

N 502 498 481 511 511 511 506 509 498 481 504 212 205 509 509 Mean 1.04 1.08 1.16 1.35 1.32 1.28 1.52 1.23 1.38 1.87 1.49 1.54 1.58 1.36 1.33

Southwest

N 1366 1347 1295 1393 1386 1370 1376 1382 1343 1318 1357 515 495 1383 1372 Mean 1.05 1.07 1.15 1.41 1.41 1.38 1.62 1.33 1.49 1.80 1.51 1.62 1.64 1.48 1.49

N 3888 3832 3687 3957 3946 3925 3922 3932 3815 3742 3887 1380 1331 3934 3911 Mean 1.06 1.09 1.16 1.39 1.41 1.36 1.59 1.29 1.43 1.79 1.52 1.59 1.62 1.47 1.46

SGNL Central

N 76 76 72 78 79 79 72 78 74 70 76 20 25 79 79 Mean 1.12 1.24 1.26 1.38 1.72 1.33 1.68 1.58 1.62 1.81 2.00 1.60 1.64 1.49 1.77

N 76 76 72 78 79 79 72 78 74 70 76 20 25 79 79 Mean 1.12 1.24 1.26 1.38 1.72 1.33 1.68 1.58 1.62 1.81 2.00 1.60 1.64 1.49 1.77

SOCI Central

N 354 352 331 365 368 363 363 367 359 351 355 147 143 366 366 Mean 1.18 1.20 1.35 1.56 1.74 1.59 1.69 1.54 1.65 1.83 1.75 1.75 1.82 1.71 1.75

Northeast

N 229 225 213 230 230 228 228 232 223 222 223 66 64 231 230 Mean 1.06 1.10 1.15 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.39 1.20 1.34 1.56 1.46 1.52 1.52 1.31 1.30

Northwest

N 604 597 575 617 617 612 611 613 587 588 599 209 202 610 604 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.25 1.50 1.60 1.52 1.65 1.42 1.62 1.79 1.66 1.68 1.67 1.48 1.50

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 23 12/17/2010

Page 50: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SOCI Southeast

N 202 198 193 199 203 204 198 203 195 193 194 60 59 200 199 Mean 1.14 1.08 1.20 1.48 1.52 1.45 1.55 1.38 1.57 1.83 1.69 1.73 1.73 1.51 1.55

Southwest

N 922 908 881 938 937 933 928 930 911 898 914 339 321 928 922 Mean 1.07 1.13 1.20 1.41 1.46 1.39 1.58 1.30 1.47 1.79 1.52 1.67 1.69 1.52 1.48

N 2311 2280 2193 2349 2355 2340 2328 2345 2275 2252 2285 821 789 2335 2321 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.23 1.46 1.53 1.45 1.59 1.37 1.53 1.78 1.60 1.68 1.70 1.52 1.52

SPAN Central

N 288 284 273 292 293 291 290 290 276 282 287 154 173 290 292 Mean 1.12 1.19 1.24 1.50 1.64 1.44 1.65 1.47 1.67 1.79 1.60 1.60 1.58 1.61 1.74

Northeast

N 67 66 64 69 67 68 69 68 67 65 69 31 33 68 69 Mean 1.03 1.17 1.11 1.30 1.55 1.35 1.52 1.54 1.43 1.62 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.43 1.71

Northwest

N 252 253 239 260 258 258 257 258 235 251 252 80 89 260 257 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.14 1.24 1.53 1.24 1.40 1.27 1.34 1.56 1.34 1.48 1.43 1.32 1.42

Southeast

N 120 119 114 120 118 120 120 120 117 113 118 57 59 119 118 Mean 1.09 1.11 1.24 1.43 1.68 1.43 1.52 1.38 1.65 1.90 1.62 1.72 1.63 1.58 1.62

Southwest

N 178 174 166 179 180 179 176 178 166 169 179 47 50 175 172 Mean 1.15 1.25 1.33 1.53 1.75 1.45 1.76 1.79 1.75 2.00 1.68 1.57 1.64 1.58 1.88

N 905 896 856 920 916 916 912 914 861 880 905 369 404 912 908 Mean 1.11 1.17 1.22 1.41 1.63 1.38 1.57 1.47 1.57 1.77 1.53 1.57 1.55 1.50 1.66

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 24 12/17/2010

Page 51: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SPCH Central

N 362 357 327 344 366 363 351 362 353 335 351 111 109 365 362 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.18 1.39 1.24 1.28 1.49 1.27 1.38 1.68 1.43 1.77 1.77 1.29 1.31

Northeast

N 257 234 243 254 258 259 259 259 253 251 254 82 75 260 257 Mean 1.06 1.16 1.10 1.23 1.19 1.23 1.28 1.19 1.26 1.57 1.28 1.46 1.51 1.22 1.19

Northwest

N 334 266 288 295 354 353 342 354 336 332 333 80 76 350 351 Mean 1.13 1.32 1.24 1.42 1.27 1.28 1.46 1.31 1.35 1.67 1.46 1.59 1.62 1.29 1.30

Southeast

N 304 300 290 308 309 310 309 308 299 296 306 119 118 305 302 Mean 1.06 1.10 1.11 1.39 1.33 1.32 1.43 1.30 1.43 1.76 1.40 1.47 1.50 1.35 1.36

Southwest

N 420 407 396 431 430 431 424 430 412 413 424 142 139 428 426 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.10 1.27 1.22 1.25 1.46 1.22 1.35 1.67 1.36 1.51 1.54 1.34 1.33

N 1677 1564 1544 1632 1717 1716 1685 1713 1653 1627 1668 534 517 1708 1698 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.14 1.34 1.25 1.27 1.43 1.26 1.36 1.67 1.39 1.56 1.59 1.30 1.30

TECA Central

N 100 99 97 99 100 101 100 101 97 98 100 35 33 101 99 Mean 1.05 1.04 1.26 1.59 1.50 1.44 1.76 1.49 1.62 1.90 1.74 1.57 1.64 1.68 1.78

Northeast

N 78 78 78 77 78 78 78 76 74 75 76 33 31 78 77 Mean 1.15 1.12 1.18 1.39 1.56 1.40 1.56 1.33 1.31 1.61 1.53 1.85 2.00 1.46 1.56

Northwest

N 104 104 99 107 106 107 104 106 105 104 104 21 21 104 106 Mean 1.06 1.03 1.07 1.25 1.25 1.23 1.34 1.18 1.29 1.53 1.32 1.52 1.52 1.33 1.30

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 25 12/17/2010

Page 52: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

TECA Southeast

N 44 42 42 45 43 42 43 43 44 41 43 17 15 44 41 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.33 1.21 1.24 1.26 1.19 1.25 1.41 1.51 1.53 1.53 1.30 1.17

Southwest

N 189 173 186 172 190 190 183 190 179 176 181 67 64 189 189 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.08 1.41 1.33 1.35 1.51 1.29 1.37 1.70 1.49 1.55 1.55 1.33 1.35

N 515 496 502 500 517 518 508 516 499 494 504 173 164 516 512 Mean 1.08 1.09 1.13 1.40 1.37 1.34 1.51 1.30 1.38 1.67 1.51 1.61 1.65 1.42 1.44

VIET Central

N 14 14 12 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 13 3 3 14 14 Mean 1.21 1.14 1.25 1.21 1.29 1.29 1.50 1.29 1.23 1.43 1.23 1.67 1.67 1.07 1.21

N 14 14 12 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 13 3 3 14 14 Mean 1.21 1.14 1.25 1.21 1.29 1.29 1.50 1.29 1.23 1.43 1.23 1.67 1.67 1.07 1.21

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2009-ACA.pdf 26 12/17/2010

Page 53: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACCT Central

N 153 154 142 154 152 155 153 154 148 144 152 42 44 154 155 Mean 1.06 1.10 1.18 1.48 1.44 1.43 1.70 1.41 1.58 1.70 1.53 1.83 1.73 1.60 1.61

Northeast

N 59 59 54 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 17 17 59 59 Mean 1.07 1.05 1.22 1.49 1.54 1.36 1.56 1.20 1.22 1.81 1.49 2.00 2.00 1.42 1.56

Northwest

N 210 206 191 212 210 209 209 207 192 199 205 51 49 210 210 Mean 1.08 1.09 1.24 1.53 1.83 1.52 1.83 1.47 1.69 1.83 1.63 1.80 1.80 1.82 1.92

Southeast

N 71 71 64 73 73 73 73 72 71 68 73 26 25 71 72 Mean 1.20 1.25 1.53 1.59 1.70 1.67 2.07 1.38 1.45 1.93 1.63 1.92 1.96 1.62 1.82

Southwest

N 452 447 418 454 455 456 454 458 439 440 445 178 173 452 449 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.24 1.52 1.69 1.50 1.71 1.36 1.54 1.68 1.55 1.69 1.72 1.61 1.70

N 945 937 869 952 949 952 948 950 909 910 934 314 308 946 945 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.25 1.52 1.67 1.50 1.75 1.38 1.55 1.74 1.57 1.76 1.77 1.64 1.74

ACNT Central

N 118 115 111 119 119 117 117 118 114 116 117 51 45 117 116 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.30 1.50 1.62 1.50 1.70 1.33 1.66 1.81 1.68 2.04 2.02 1.69 1.62

Northeast

N 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 12 4 3 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.17 1.42 1.42 1.33 1.42 1.25 1.33 1.90 1.58 1.50 1.67 1.25 1.17

Northwest

N 133 127 121 132 130 134 130 133 123 128 128 46 45 133 130 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.26 1.54 1.67 1.49 1.68 1.42 1.66 1.66 1.62 1.61 1.51 1.60 1.67

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 1 12/17/2010

Page 54: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACNT Southwest

N 480 470 449 476 481 481 466 480 457 449 465 174 168 478 476 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.22 1.45 1.59 1.37 1.72 1.35 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.68 1.70 1.54 1.61

N 742 724 693 739 742 744 725 743 706 703 722 275 261 740 734 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.24 1.47 1.61 1.41 1.70 1.36 1.53 1.67 1.61 1.73 1.72 1.57 1.61

ARCE Northeast

N 12 13 11 13 12 13 11 13 10 11 12 4 7 13 12 Mean 1.08 1.62 1.09 2.23 2.17 1.92 2.18 1.77 1.40 1.91 2.42 2.50 2.29 1.77 2.33

Northwest

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 9 11 11 Mean 1.36 1.45 1.64 2.73 3.55 2.91 3.18 3.36 3.73 3.27 3.36 3.40 3.22 3.45 4.18

Southeast

N 13 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 9 9 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.23 1.15 1.50 1.54 1.62 1.77 1.38 1.62 1.77 1.54 1.56 1.44 1.46 1.69

N 36 37 35 36 36 37 35 37 34 35 36 23 25 37 36 Mean 1.17 1.43 1.29 2.14 2.36 2.11 2.34 2.11 2.24 2.29 2.39 2.52 2.32 2.16 2.67

ARTC Southwest

N 378 255 351 324 381 381 362 378 354 347 366 188 210 379 378 Mean 1.11 1.41 1.24 1.68 1.69 1.45 1.73 1.52 1.67 1.77 1.78 1.72 1.66 1.64 1.74

N 378 255 351 324 381 381 362 378 354 347 366 188 210 379 378 Mean 1.11 1.41 1.24 1.68 1.69 1.45 1.73 1.52 1.67 1.77 1.78 1.72 1.66 1.64 1.74

ARTV Southwest

N 39 32 38 33 36 38 32 39 39 31 36 22 23 39 39 Mean 1.10 1.31 1.18 1.70 1.33 1.42 1.69 1.28 1.41 1.52 1.42 1.55 1.48 1.33 1.38

N 39 32 38 33 36 38 32 39 39 31 36 22 23 39 39 Mean 1.10 1.31 1.18 1.70 1.33 1.42 1.69 1.28 1.41 1.52 1.42 1.55 1.48 1.33 1.38

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 2 12/17/2010

Page 55: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

AUMT Northeast

N 427 428 418 440 440 439 437 438 436 434 429 429 426 440 438 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.33 1.31 1.31 1.41 1.24 1.35 1.48 1.43 1.24 1.36 1.32 1.32

N 427 428 418 440 440 439 437 438 436 434 429 429 426 440 438 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.33 1.31 1.31 1.41 1.24 1.35 1.48 1.43 1.24 1.36 1.32 1.32

BARB Southeast

N 62 61 59 64 65 64 65 64 64 64 63 61 61 65 63 Mean 1.18 1.16 1.37 1.36 1.46 1.44 1.49 1.44 1.48 1.56 1.46 1.44 1.51 1.55 1.54

N 62 61 59 64 65 64 65 64 64 64 63 61 61 65 63 Mean 1.18 1.16 1.37 1.36 1.46 1.44 1.49 1.44 1.48 1.56 1.46 1.44 1.51 1.55 1.54

BITC Northeast

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.20 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.20 1.80 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.20 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.20 1.80 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

BMGT Central

N 29 28 28 29 29 29 29 29 28 26 28 10 9 29 28 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.21 1.38 1.48 1.28 1.55 1.59 1.71 1.69 1.54 2.00 2.00 1.66 1.57

Northeast

N 45 45 41 46 46 46 45 46 45 43 44 17 16 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.02 1.27 1.22 1.17 1.17 1.60 1.20 1.29 1.53 1.27 1.59 1.81 1.20 1.24

Northwest

N 53 53 51 54 54 54 54 54 53 51 53 27 25 52 53 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.18 1.46 1.44 1.39 1.46 1.28 1.36 1.63 1.42 1.59 1.52 1.46 1.42

Southwest

N 98 99 91 99 99 97 97 99 98 95 98 54 54 99 99

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 3 12/17/2010

Page 56: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.02 1.08 1.08 1.21 1.25 1.18 1.34 1.23 1.34 1.77 1.48 1.48 1.52 1.22 1.20

N 225 225 211 228 228 226 225 228 224 215 223 108 104 226 226 Mean 1.03 1.08 1.16 1.29 1.31 1.24 1.45 1.28 1.38 1.68 1.43 1.57 1.61 1.33 1.31

BNKG Central

N 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33

N 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33

BUSG Central

N 108 104 104 106 110 109 106 109 109 104 106 41 39 109 109 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.12 1.33 1.28 1.29 1.42 1.18 1.37 1.66 1.42 1.41 1.44 1.27 1.24

Northeast

N 59 48 57 59 61 61 61 61 60 61 61 15 13 61 61 Mean 1.02 1.06 1.11 1.22 1.21 1.18 1.30 1.11 1.10 1.46 1.21 1.60 1.62 1.16 1.16

Northwest

N 113 106 108 110 115 114 106 116 109 99 106 32 32 115 114 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.20 1.45 1.40 1.41 1.64 1.32 1.55 1.85 1.84 1.75 1.78 1.38 1.49

Southeast

N 19 18 17 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 19 10 9 19 19 Mean 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.37 1.32 1.32 1.58 1.42 1.42 1.39 1.42 1.60 1.67 1.53 1.53

Southwest

N 143 135 129 137 144 143 141 143 141 136 142 56 53 142 141 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.28 1.47 1.53 1.46 1.61 1.31 1.50 1.55 1.64 1.63 1.66 1.37 1.48

N 442 411 415 431 449 446 433 448 438 418 434 154 146 446 444 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.18 1.39 1.39 1.36 1.53 1.26 1.42 1.63 1.57 1.59 1.62 1.33 1.38

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 4 12/17/2010

Page 57: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CDEC Central

N 117 115 116 110 121 120 120 119 114 116 120 74 74 120 120 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.25 1.43 1.42 1.34 1.61 1.37 1.40 1.72 1.51 1.50 1.51 1.39 1.58

N 117 115 116 110 121 120 120 119 114 116 120 74 74 120 120 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.25 1.43 1.42 1.34 1.61 1.37 1.40 1.72 1.51 1.50 1.51 1.39 1.58

CETT Northeast

N 103 102 88 103 103 103 101 102 93 95 99 90 89 103 102 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.26 1.45 1.45 1.33 1.50 1.22 1.45 1.53 1.57 1.41 1.35 1.58 1.47

N 103 102 88 103 103 103 101 102 93 95 99 90 89 103 102 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.26 1.45 1.45 1.33 1.50 1.22 1.45 1.53 1.57 1.41 1.35 1.58 1.47

CHEF Central

N 304 260 283 298 301 301 295 300 296 283 295 256 253 303 295 Mean 1.05 1.07 1.07 1.21 1.26 1.23 1.39 1.26 1.25 1.49 1.33 1.35 1.26 1.30 1.28

N 304 260 283 298 301 301 295 300 296 283 295 256 253 303 295 Mean 1.05 1.07 1.07 1.21 1.26 1.23 1.39 1.26 1.25 1.49 1.33 1.35 1.26 1.30 1.28

CHLT Coleman

N 31 8 32 20 32 32 20 32 32 22 26 11 13 32 32 Mean 1.19 1.63 1.28 1.30 1.31 1.41 1.90 1.13 1.34 1.68 1.69 2.00 2.00 1.34 1.31

N 31 8 32 20 32 32 20 32 32 22 26 11 13 32 32 Mean 1.19 1.63 1.28 1.30 1.31 1.41 1.90 1.13 1.34 1.68 1.69 2.00 2.00 1.34 1.31

CJLE Northeast

N 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 5 12/17/2010

Page 58: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CJSA Northeast

N 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

CMSW Coleman

N 19 18 19 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 6 7 19 18 Mean 1.05 1.11 1.16 1.61 1.32 1.26 1.79 1.32 1.58 1.89 1.53 1.83 1.71 1.21 1.28

N 19 18 19 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 6 7 19 18 Mean 1.05 1.11 1.16 1.61 1.32 1.26 1.79 1.32 1.58 1.89 1.53 1.83 1.71 1.21 1.28

CNBT Central

N 52 53 49 53 53 53 53 53 51 51 53 31 32 52 53 Mean 1.15 1.13 1.57 1.47 1.38 1.40 1.40 1.26 1.39 1.63 1.40 1.61 1.69 1.46 1.45

N 52 53 49 53 53 53 53 53 51 51 53 31 32 52 53 Mean 1.15 1.13 1.57 1.47 1.38 1.40 1.40 1.26 1.39 1.63 1.40 1.61 1.69 1.46 1.45

CPMT Central

N 21 21 20 20 21 20 20 21 20 20 20 17 17 21 21 Mean 1.14 1.10 1.35 1.55 1.67 1.50 1.90 1.38 1.65 2.30 1.90 1.41 1.59 1.71 1.76

Northeast

N 11 11 10 11 12 12 11 12 11 11 11 8 8 12 12 Mean 1.27 1.45 1.40 1.73 2.42 1.75 2.09 1.58 2.00 2.45 2.09 2.25 2.38 1.83 2.00

Northwest

N 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 12 13 13 8 8 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.46 1.46 1.38 1.50 1.23 1.50 1.62 1.38 1.25 1.25 1.42 1.50

N 45 45 43 44 46 45 43 46 43 44 44 33 33 45 45 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.28 1.57 1.80 1.53 1.84 1.39 1.70 2.14 1.80 1.58 1.70 1.67 1.76

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 6 12/17/2010

Page 59: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CRPT Central

N 16 11 15 16 17 15 17 17 17 17 16 16 14 18 16 Mean 1.25 1.45 1.27 1.56 1.47 1.20 1.59 1.41 1.47 1.76 1.81 1.19 1.57 1.22 1.31

N 16 11 15 16 17 15 17 17 17 17 16 16 14 18 16 Mean 1.25 1.45 1.27 1.56 1.47 1.20 1.59 1.41 1.47 1.76 1.81 1.19 1.57 1.22 1.31

CSIR Central

N 17 12 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 15 17 15 15 18 18 Mean 1.24 1.42 1.06 1.50 1.39 1.44 1.61 1.33 1.53 1.47 1.71 1.27 1.27 1.28 1.39

N 17 12 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 15 17 15 15 18 18 Mean 1.24 1.42 1.06 1.50 1.39 1.44 1.61 1.33 1.53 1.47 1.71 1.27 1.27 1.28 1.39

CSME Central

N 81 81 80 85 84 85 81 84 84 83 80 81 78 82 82 Mean 1.15 1.16 1.25 1.47 1.80 1.49 1.58 1.54 1.65 1.89 1.49 1.44 1.41 1.48 1.56

Northeast

N 107 104 105 107 107 107 107 106 106 103 107 102 101 108 108 Mean 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.23 1.29 1.27 1.29 1.28 1.32 1.83 1.30 1.21 1.29 1.29 1.31

Northwest

N 199 200 199 208 208 209 205 207 205 203 207 205 205 207 208 Mean 1.17 1.24 1.23 1.55 1.61 1.48 1.58 1.39 1.41 1.65 1.48 1.38 1.51 1.40 1.60

Southeast

N 213 203 211 218 219 218 215 218 216 210 216 210 207 219 216 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.09 1.30 1.37 1.40 1.51 1.26 1.51 1.90 1.59 1.38 1.51 1.45 1.40

N 600 588 595 618 618 619 608 615 611 599 610 598 591 616 614 Mean 1.11 1.16 1.15 1.39 1.50 1.42 1.50 1.34 1.46 1.80 1.49 1.36 1.46 1.41 1.47

CTEC Northeast

N 23 21 22 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 24 23 23 24 24

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 7 12/17/2010

Page 60: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.08 1.13 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.13 1.33 1.17 1.04 1.09 1.13 1.13

N 23 21 22 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 24 23 23 24 24 Mean 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.08 1.13 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.13 1.33 1.17 1.04 1.09 1.13 1.13

CTMT Coleman

N 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 20 21 20 12 9 20 21 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.81 1.33 1.29 1.62 1.24 1.20 1.52 1.30 1.17 1.11 1.20 1.24

N 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 20 21 20 12 9 20 21 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.81 1.33 1.29 1.62 1.24 1.20 1.52 1.30 1.17 1.11 1.20 1.24

DAAC Coleman

N 93 89 88 94 95 95 95 94 87 89 95 34 35 94 91 Mean 1.20 1.15 1.17 1.82 1.71 1.54 1.87 1.48 1.75 1.90 1.92 1.85 1.91 1.52 1.75

N 93 89 88 94 95 95 95 94 87 89 95 34 35 94 91 Mean 1.20 1.15 1.17 1.82 1.71 1.54 1.87 1.48 1.75 1.90 1.92 1.85 1.91 1.52 1.75

DEMR Northeast

N 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.67 1.33 1.40 1.17 1.17 1.20 2.33 1.33 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.33

N 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.67 1.33 1.40 1.17 1.17 1.20 2.33 1.33 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.33

DFTG Central

N 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 12 11 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.25 1.05 1.20 1.32 1.35 1.25 1.36 1.25 1.20

Northeast

N 137 105 129 135 142 142 137 143 140 134 134 83 96 142 140 Mean 1.14 1.22 1.17 1.35 1.44 1.32 1.39 1.34 1.39 1.57 1.41 1.49 1.40 1.43 1.45

Northwest

N 131 119 122 127 131 131 128 130 127 126 130 78 84 130 126 Mean 1.09 1.24 1.20 1.55 1.88 1.51 1.67 1.48 1.53 1.67 1.68 1.83 1.75 1.70 1.71

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 8 12/17/2010

Page 61: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DFTG Southeast

N 78 75 74 79 79 80 80 80 78 78 80 44 54 80 79 Mean 1.17 1.24 1.20 1.39 1.53 1.40 1.50 1.31 1.58 1.60 1.65 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.63

Southwest

N 150 148 146 148 156 155 153 156 149 153 154 105 110 153 149 Mean 1.13 1.20 1.21 1.57 1.87 1.43 1.65 1.36 1.54 1.69 1.53 1.66 1.67 1.64 1.81

N 516 466 490 509 528 528 518 529 514 510 518 322 355 525 514 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.19 1.46 1.68 1.41 1.55 1.37 1.49 1.63 1.55 1.66 1.61 1.58 1.63

DHYG Coleman

N 62 62 61 62 62 62 62 62 60 62 62 61 62 62 61 Mean 1.13 1.10 1.34 1.90 2.11 1.95 2.18 1.87 2.05 1.81 2.02 1.95 1.92 2.05 1.98

N 62 62 61 62 62 62 62 62 60 62 62 61 62 62 61 Mean 1.13 1.10 1.34 1.90 2.11 1.95 2.18 1.87 2.05 1.81 2.02 1.95 1.92 2.05 1.98

DMSO Coleman

N 137 128 124 137 140 139 139 138 138 138 139 88 85 142 141 Mean 1.02 1.14 1.09 1.26 1.47 1.41 1.60 1.38 1.59 1.46 1.47 1.40 1.36 1.32 1.40

N 137 128 124 137 140 139 139 138 138 138 139 88 85 142 141 Mean 1.02 1.14 1.09 1.26 1.47 1.41 1.60 1.38 1.59 1.46 1.47 1.40 1.36 1.32 1.40

DNTA Coleman

N 102 100 99 103 103 103 103 103 103 93 102 86 86 103 103 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.36 1.50 1.36 1.54 1.33 1.58 1.71 1.67 1.30 1.40 1.47 1.46

N 102 100 99 103 103 103 103 103 103 93 102 86 86 103 103 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.36 1.50 1.36 1.54 1.33 1.58 1.71 1.67 1.30 1.40 1.47 1.46

ELMT Central

N 22 16 21 23 23 23 23 23 22 20 23 21 21 23 23 Mean 1.27 1.38 1.19 1.35 1.39 1.48 1.48 1.35 1.41 1.50 1.35 1.38 1.48 1.39 1.39

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 9 12/17/2010

Page 62: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 22 16 21 23 23 23 23 23 22 20 23 21 21 23 23 Mean 1.27 1.38 1.19 1.35 1.39 1.48 1.48 1.35 1.41 1.50 1.35 1.38 1.48 1.39 1.39

ELPT Central

N 176 180 167 186 187 185 184 183 185 182 185 158 158 186 184 Mean 1.22 1.05 1.22 1.54 1.65 1.56 1.53 1.47 1.65 1.87 1.58 1.46 1.60 1.54 1.66

N 176 180 167 186 187 185 184 183 185 182 185 158 158 186 184 Mean 1.22 1.05 1.22 1.54 1.65 1.56 1.53 1.47 1.65 1.87 1.58 1.46 1.60 1.54 1.66

EMSP Northwest

N 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 12 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.00 1.15 1.54 1.31 1.31 2.15 1.15 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.33 1.25 1.15 1.23

Southwest

N 19 19 19 20 20 20 19 20 19 18 19 20 20 20 19 Mean 1.05 1.21 1.26 1.65 1.70 1.45 2.53 1.35 1.68 1.83 2.05 1.30 1.75 1.55 1.21

N 32 32 32 33 33 33 32 33 32 31 32 32 32 33 32 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.22 1.61 1.55 1.39 2.38 1.27 1.56 1.65 1.78 1.31 1.56 1.39 1.22

ENTC Central

N 10 10 10 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Mean 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.08 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15

N 10 10 10 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Mean 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.08 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15

ETWR Southwest

N 26 26 24 23 25 26 26 26 21 22 26 11 10 25 25 Mean 1.27 1.15 1.21 1.57 1.72 1.62 1.62 1.46 1.81 1.91 1.69 1.64 1.80 1.56 1.80

N 26 26 24 23 25 26 26 26 21 22 26 11 10 25 25 Mean 1.27 1.15 1.21 1.57 1.72 1.62 1.62 1.46 1.81 1.91 1.69 1.64 1.80 1.56 1.80

FIRS Northeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 10 12/17/2010

Page 63: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

FIRT Northeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

FITT Central

N 31 28 29 30 31 31 31 31 30 28 29 24 24 30 31 Mean 1.03 1.14 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.42 1.19 1.43 1.75 1.24 1.42 1.38 1.33 1.23

N 31 28 29 30 31 31 31 31 30 28 29 24 24 30 31 Mean 1.03 1.14 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.29 1.42 1.19 1.43 1.75 1.24 1.42 1.38 1.33 1.23

FLMC Northwest

N 129 121 122 127 128 129 126 127 122 123 126 81 84 129 129 Mean 1.03 1.15 1.11 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.65 1.37 1.59 1.60 1.56 1.40 1.42 1.33 1.51

N 129 121 122 127 128 129 126 127 122 123 126 81 84 129 129 Mean 1.03 1.15 1.11 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.65 1.37 1.59 1.60 1.56 1.40 1.42 1.33 1.51

FMKT Northwest

N 17 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 14 13 17 17 Mean 1.35 1.06 1.06 1.47 1.41 1.24 1.76 1.24 1.31 2.00 1.35 1.36 1.15 1.29 1.24

N 17 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 14 13 17 17 Mean 1.35 1.06 1.06 1.47 1.41 1.24 1.76 1.24 1.31 2.00 1.35 1.36 1.15 1.29 1.24

FSHD Central

N 401 336 362 356 406 405 387 407 386 384 389 271 276 405 402 Mean 1.07 1.18 1.12 1.39 1.34 1.24 1.41 1.24 1.34 1.49 1.36 1.35 1.33 1.29 1.38

N 401 336 362 356 406 405 387 407 386 384 389 271 276 405 402

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 11 12/17/2010

Page 64: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.07 1.18 1.12 1.39 1.34 1.24 1.41 1.24 1.34 1.49 1.36 1.35 1.33 1.29 1.38

FSHN Central

N 88 70 77 87 90 88 87 89 85 81 82 47 45 88 86 Mean 1.22 1.27 1.26 1.60 1.71 1.59 1.69 1.45 1.62 1.74 1.77 1.51 1.47 1.57 1.60

N 88 70 77 87 90 88 87 89 85 81 82 47 45 88 86 Mean 1.22 1.27 1.26 1.60 1.71 1.59 1.69 1.45 1.62 1.74 1.77 1.51 1.47 1.57 1.60

GAME Southwest

N 294 225 287 282 306 303 299 303 284 293 294 155 166 300 301 Mean 1.14 1.32 1.20 1.57 1.53 1.32 1.57 1.43 1.56 1.66 1.71 1.65 1.58 1.54 1.57

N 294 225 287 282 306 303 299 303 284 293 294 155 166 300 301 Mean 1.14 1.32 1.20 1.57 1.53 1.32 1.57 1.43 1.56 1.66 1.71 1.65 1.58 1.54 1.57

GISC Southwest

N 38 24 39 40 40 40 39 40 40 39 39 16 29 40 40 Mean 1.39 1.38 1.21 2.03 2.50 1.80 2.28 1.78 2.15 2.05 2.23 2.25 1.90 2.10 2.33

N 38 24 39 40 40 40 39 40 40 39 39 16 29 40 40 Mean 1.39 1.38 1.21 2.03 2.50 1.80 2.28 1.78 2.15 2.05 2.23 2.25 1.90 2.10 2.33

HALT Northwest

N 50 47 47 46 50 49 47 50 47 44 49 20 21 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.40 1.06 1.35 1.40 1.22 1.55 1.18 1.38 1.36 1.51 1.50 1.48 1.46 1.42

N 50 47 47 46 50 49 47 50 47 44 49 20 21 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.40 1.06 1.35 1.40 1.22 1.55 1.18 1.38 1.36 1.51 1.50 1.48 1.46 1.42

HAMG Central

N 91 82 87 86 90 90 90 89 91 90 90 44 44 90 88 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.18 1.37 1.39 1.32 1.31 1.25 1.32 1.42 1.40 1.43 1.43 1.32 1.27

N 91 82 87 86 90 90 90 89 91 90 90 44 44 90 88 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.18 1.37 1.39 1.32 1.31 1.25 1.32 1.42 1.40 1.43 1.43 1.32 1.27

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 12 12/17/2010

Page 65: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HART Central

N 291 282 271 300 307 302 296 303 302 287 290 266 264 302 301 Mean 1.14 1.17 1.22 1.44 1.53 1.41 1.52 1.46 1.48 1.71 1.50 1.48 1.48 1.42 1.44

Southeast

N 23 22 21 23 23 23 23 23 22 23 23 22 22 23 23 Mean 1.04 1.05 1.33 1.30 1.65 1.39 1.48 1.39 1.41 1.30 1.39 1.27 1.18 1.43 1.52

N 314 304 292 323 330 325 319 326 324 310 313 288 286 325 324 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.23 1.43 1.54 1.41 1.51 1.45 1.48 1.68 1.49 1.47 1.46 1.42 1.44

HITT Coleman

N 73 70 67 69 73 72 70 73 70 65 68 37 35 73 74 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.13 1.61 1.95 1.63 1.81 1.71 1.96 1.77 2.28 1.76 1.63 1.81 1.92

N 73 70 67 69 73 72 70 73 70 65 68 37 35 73 74 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.13 1.61 1.95 1.63 1.81 1.71 1.96 1.77 2.28 1.76 1.63 1.81 1.92

HLAB Coleman

N 58 51 55 55 58 58 56 58 58 55 56 33 32 59 59 Mean 1.00 1.16 1.05 1.47 1.57 1.57 1.64 1.31 1.36 1.71 1.48 1.24 1.28 1.31 1.37

N 58 51 55 55 58 58 56 58 58 55 56 33 32 59 59 Mean 1.00 1.16 1.05 1.47 1.57 1.57 1.64 1.31 1.36 1.71 1.48 1.24 1.28 1.31 1.37

HPRS Coleman

N 837 826 807 846 851 848 836 846 826 799 828 429 435 850 841 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.18 1.37 1.43 1.39 1.50 1.26 1.38 1.79 1.48 1.59 1.59 1.40 1.43

Northeast

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 13 14 14 5 4 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.13 1.07 1.13 1.07 1.07 1.00 1.31 1.36 1.36 1.60 1.75 1.00 1.07

N 852 841 822 861 866 863 850 860 839 813 842 434 439 865 856 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.18 1.37 1.42 1.38 1.49 1.26 1.38 1.78 1.48 1.59 1.59 1.39 1.42

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 13 12/17/2010

Page 66: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HRPO Central

N 26 26 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 9 8 26 25 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.36 1.40 1.42 1.35 1.42 1.27 1.46 1.88 1.73 1.67 1.88 1.50 1.56

Northeast

N 39 37 37 39 39 39 38 38 37 36 39 10 9 39 39 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.11 1.23 1.15 1.21 1.47 1.16 1.30 1.39 1.36 1.40 1.44 1.15 1.15

Northwest

N 47 47 47 46 47 47 46 47 44 45 46 11 11 46 45 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.17 1.35 1.32 1.30 1.43 1.19 1.34 1.64 1.37 1.64 1.64 1.28 1.20

Southwest

N 72 69 65 73 73 73 70 73 72 71 71 26 26 73 73 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.14 1.26 1.11 1.23 1.44 1.12 1.26 1.44 1.32 1.50 1.50 1.16 1.23

N 184 179 174 183 185 185 180 184 179 178 182 56 54 184 182 Mean 1.03 1.08 1.17 1.30 1.22 1.26 1.44 1.17 1.32 1.54 1.40 1.54 1.57 1.24 1.25

HYDR Central

N 8 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 6 Mean 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.38 1.63 1.50 1.38 1.25 1.38 1.63 1.38 1.43 1.43 1.50 1.33

N 8 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 6 Mean 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.38 1.63 1.50 1.38 1.25 1.38 1.63 1.38 1.43 1.43 1.50 1.33

IBUS Central

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 9 9 11 2 3 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.27 1.36 1.45 1.45 1.27 1.44 1.44 1.91 1.50 1.33 1.36 1.36

Northeast

N 7 6 7 6 7 7 6 7 7 6 6 1 1 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.29 1.50 1.71 1.29 1.50 1.29 1.29 1.17 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.57 1.57

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 14 12/17/2010

Page 67: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

IBUS Southeast

N 8 8 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 8 4 4 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.22 1.22 1.11 1.78 1.67 1.44 1.14 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.67 1.67

Southwest

N 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 19 18 18 13 13 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.16 1.30 1.20 1.25 1.40 1.20 1.37 1.44 1.33 1.31 1.15 1.40 1.25

N 45 44 43 46 47 47 46 47 44 40 43 20 21 47 47 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.19 1.30 1.32 1.28 1.50 1.32 1.39 1.35 1.49 1.35 1.24 1.47 1.40

IMED Southwest

N 89 78 83 73 91 90 85 90 87 83 87 40 46 91 88 Mean 1.19 1.51 1.24 1.84 1.91 1.56 1.82 1.50 1.76 1.57 1.95 1.70 1.85 1.69 1.97

N 89 78 83 73 91 90 85 90 87 83 87 40 46 91 88 Mean 1.19 1.51 1.24 1.84 1.91 1.56 1.82 1.50 1.76 1.57 1.95 1.70 1.85 1.69 1.97

INDS Central

N 167 151 155 135 163 162 161 164 162 157 161 87 99 167 164 Mean 1.03 1.13 1.08 1.42 1.37 1.23 1.42 1.36 1.38 1.45 1.41 1.45 1.39 1.37 1.42

N 167 151 155 135 163 162 161 164 162 157 161 87 99 167 164 Mean 1.03 1.13 1.08 1.42 1.37 1.23 1.42 1.36 1.38 1.45 1.41 1.45 1.39 1.37 1.42

INTC Northeast

N 46 46 46 47 49 49 47 49 48 49 47 46 45 49 49 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.13 1.60 1.71 1.55 1.79 1.31 1.54 1.69 1.60 1.54 1.53 1.49 1.55

N 46 46 46 47 49 49 47 49 48 49 47 46 45 49 49 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.13 1.60 1.71 1.55 1.79 1.31 1.54 1.69 1.60 1.54 1.53 1.49 1.55

ITCC Southwest

N 18 16 17 18 18 18 17 18 18 17 16 15 16 18 18 Mean 1.11 1.13 1.35 1.28 1.22 1.33 1.53 1.28 1.44 1.53 1.38 1.47 1.19 1.17 1.17

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 15 12/17/2010

Page 68: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 18 16 17 18 18 18 17 18 18 17 16 15 16 18 18 Mean 1.11 1.13 1.35 1.28 1.22 1.33 1.53 1.28 1.44 1.53 1.38 1.47 1.19 1.17 1.17

ITMT Central

N 27 26 26 28 27 27 27 27 25 27 26 24 24 27 27 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 1.22 1.19 1.26 1.19 1.20 1.30 1.31 1.17 1.21 1.26 1.22

Northwest

N 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 21 21 26 25 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.08 1.62 1.62 1.69 1.77 1.62 1.65 1.62 1.54 1.71 1.86 1.77 1.84

N 52 51 51 54 53 53 53 53 51 53 52 45 45 53 52 Mean 1.04 1.02 1.04 1.39 1.42 1.43 1.51 1.40 1.43 1.45 1.42 1.42 1.51 1.51 1.52

ITNW Central

N 15 15 15 17 17 16 15 17 17 15 15 5 5 17 16 Mean 1.33 1.60 1.53 1.88 1.71 1.69 2.07 1.65 1.82 2.07 2.00 2.00 2.40 1.76 1.81

Northwest

N 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 9 10 14 14 Mean 1.07 1.36 1.08 1.36 1.21 1.21 1.50 1.29 1.36 1.50 1.36 1.44 1.30 1.21 1.21

Southwest

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 16 16 9 10 16 16 Mean 1.13 1.06 1.33 1.63 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.31 1.60 1.50 1.69 1.67 1.80 1.44 1.56

N 45 45 43 47 47 46 45 47 46 45 45 23 25 47 46 Mean 1.18 1.33 1.33 1.64 1.49 1.48 1.78 1.43 1.61 1.69 1.69 1.65 1.72 1.49 1.54

ITSC Central

N 72 72 70 75 76 76 77 76 74 74 76 44 46 77 76 Mean 1.10 1.22 1.26 1.41 1.82 1.50 1.61 1.84 1.74 1.81 1.67 1.84 1.72 1.87 1.80

Northeast

N 41 41 40 40 41 41 41 41 41 39 41 26 25 40 41 Mean 1.20 1.00 1.15 1.53 1.56 1.46 1.59 1.61 1.63 1.97 1.63 1.69 1.56 1.63 1.61

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 16 12/17/2010

Page 69: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ITSC Northwest

N 95 97 93 102 102 103 101 103 99 99 100 64 70 100 99 Mean 1.15 1.12 1.24 1.39 1.58 1.45 1.49 1.51 1.46 1.62 1.52 1.53 1.49 1.45 1.61

Southeast

N 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 30 29 31 19 19 31 31 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.19 1.58 1.39 1.42 1.57 1.26 1.47 1.62 1.58 1.68 1.63 1.32 1.32

Southwest

N 134 122 131 132 135 135 133 135 133 126 132 82 85 135 135 Mean 1.09 1.14 1.17 1.48 1.54 1.46 1.49 1.44 1.50 1.80 1.61 1.44 1.44 1.52 1.56

N 373 363 365 380 385 386 382 386 377 367 380 235 245 383 382 Mean 1.12 1.14 1.20 1.46 1.59 1.46 1.53 1.54 1.55 1.76 1.60 1.59 1.53 1.57 1.60

ITSE Central

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 5 6 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.18 1.30 1.09 1.64 1.18 1.64 1.09 1.64 1.55 1.09 1.40 1.33 2.09 1.55

Northwest

N 17 13 17 17 17 17 14 16 16 12 16 6 9 17 16 Mean 1.29 1.69 1.41 1.53 1.35 1.35 1.93 1.13 1.19 2.17 1.94 1.83 1.33 1.47 1.44

Southwest

N 16 16 16 15 17 17 17 17 16 16 17 10 14 17 17 Mean 1.31 1.13 1.38 2.20 2.24 1.82 1.94 1.53 1.94 1.81 2.06 1.50 2.14 2.12 2.29

N 44 40 43 43 45 45 42 44 43 39 44 21 29 45 44 Mean 1.23 1.33 1.37 1.65 1.76 1.49 1.86 1.27 1.58 1.85 1.77 1.57 1.72 1.87 1.80

ITSY Central

N 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 9 11 16 16 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.31 1.25 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.44 1.38 1.33 1.27 1.31 1.19

N 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 9 11 16 16

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 17 12/17/2010

Page 70: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.31 1.25 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.44 1.38 1.33 1.27 1.31 1.19

LEAD Central

N 168 156 164 173 173 173 172 171 169 168 169 107 100 171 170 Mean 1.04 1.26 1.13 1.27 1.22 1.31 1.30 1.23 1.38 1.52 1.40 1.47 1.43 1.33 1.26

Northeast

N 100 81 89 95 101 100 99 101 101 94 98 60 58 101 101 Mean 1.10 1.23 1.21 1.42 1.28 1.37 1.45 1.16 1.32 1.61 1.36 1.47 1.48 1.33 1.24

Northwest

N 142 120 129 137 143 139 136 143 135 135 135 54 52 142 142 Mean 1.20 1.31 1.30 1.54 1.52 1.55 1.71 1.30 1.60 1.80 1.84 1.78 1.75 1.56 1.61

Southeast

N 67 67 63 65 67 67 65 67 66 65 66 38 39 64 65 Mean 1.16 1.16 1.25 1.48 1.58 1.54 1.49 1.49 1.58 1.78 1.64 1.87 1.95 1.39 1.72

Southwest

N 165 149 155 164 169 169 166 168 166 160 157 93 93 166 166 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.26 1.49 1.44 1.44 1.52 1.39 1.56 1.79 1.60 1.63 1.63 1.46 1.51

N 642 573 600 634 653 648 638 650 637 622 625 352 342 644 644 Mean 1.11 1.22 1.23 1.43 1.39 1.43 1.49 1.30 1.49 1.69 1.56 1.60 1.60 1.42 1.45

LGLA Central

N 249 228 201 239 248 247 232 248 239 226 226 79 75 248 249 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.16 1.42 1.40 1.46 1.54 1.37 1.46 1.56 1.47 1.49 1.51 1.45 1.48

N 249 228 201 239 248 247 232 248 239 226 226 79 75 248 249 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.16 1.42 1.40 1.46 1.54 1.37 1.46 1.56 1.47 1.49 1.51 1.45 1.48

LMGT Central

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 6 6 Mean 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.17 1.33 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 2.00 2.00 1.17 1.17

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 18 12/17/2010

Page 71: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

LMGT Northeast

N 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 9 9 8 9 2 2 9 9 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.44 1.22 1.13 1.22 1.22 1.13 1.22 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.33

N 14 14 14 14 15 15 14 15 15 14 15 5 5 15 15 Mean 1.14 1.21 1.14 1.21 1.33 1.20 1.21 1.13 1.20 1.14 1.20 1.60 1.60 1.20 1.27

MCHN Central

N 30 29 29 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 32 32 Mean 1.23 1.07 1.07 1.38 1.38 1.25 1.41 1.34 1.50 1.55 1.44 1.19 1.45 1.31 1.31

N 30 29 29 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 32 32 Mean 1.23 1.07 1.07 1.38 1.38 1.25 1.41 1.34 1.50 1.55 1.44 1.19 1.45 1.31 1.31

MDCA Central

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.13 1.38 1.63 1.50 1.63 1.25 1.50 2.38 1.63 1.80 1.80 1.63 2.25

Coleman

N 156 156 149 160 160 160 160 159 154 155 156 138 137 158 156 Mean 1.10 1.08 1.19 1.75 1.95 1.68 1.82 1.85 1.69 1.97 1.88 1.53 1.53 1.69 1.88

Southwest

N 44 44 41 44 44 44 44 44 44 42 44 17 16 43 43 Mean 1.07 1.02 1.05 1.25 1.50 1.27 1.32 1.39 1.41 1.69 1.41 1.29 1.31 1.37 1.49

N 208 208 198 212 212 212 212 211 206 205 208 160 158 209 207 Mean 1.10 1.07 1.16 1.63 1.84 1.58 1.71 1.73 1.62 1.93 1.77 1.51 1.51 1.62 1.81

MLAB Coleman

N 176 173 171 181 181 181 181 181 179 179 181 171 170 180 179 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.23 1.27 1.27 1.33 1.17 1.25 1.33 1.37 1.19 1.25 1.29 1.23

N 176 173 171 181 181 181 181 181 179 179 181 171 170 180 179 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.23 1.27 1.27 1.33 1.17 1.25 1.33 1.37 1.19 1.25 1.29 1.23

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 19 12/17/2010

Page 72: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MRKG Central

N 25 25 25 26 26 26 25 25 26 25 26 7 7 26 25 Mean 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.31 1.19 1.27 1.60 1.16 1.27 1.68 1.38 1.71 1.71 1.31 1.20

Northeast

N 10 10 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 3 3 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.09 1.18 1.09 1.55 1.09 1.09 1.45 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.09

Southwest

N 40 38 36 39 39 38 37 39 38 38 38 11 11 38 37 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.53 2.00 1.49 1.55 1.92 1.79 1.92 1.87 1.66 1.73 2.00 1.79 2.05

N 75 73 70 76 76 75 73 75 75 74 74 21 21 75 73 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.30 1.63 1.34 1.39 1.75 1.48 1.57 1.74 1.50 1.62 1.76 1.55 1.62

MRMT Southwest

N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50

N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50

MSSG Coleman

N 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 40 40 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.08 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.03 1.00 1.00

N 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 40 40 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.08 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.03 1.00 1.00

MUSB Northeast

N 19 20 18 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 10 9 22 22 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.11 1.45 1.41 1.36 1.41 1.36 1.41 1.64 1.43 1.20 1.22 1.27 1.36

Northwest

N 83 79 78 83 83 84 83 84 81 83 84 38 37 83 81

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 20 12/17/2010

Page 73: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.02 1.05 1.06 1.18 1.27 1.21 1.42 1.15 1.28 1.45 1.35 1.37 1.35 1.28 1.30

N 102 99 96 105 105 106 105 106 103 105 105 48 46 105 103 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.07 1.24 1.30 1.25 1.42 1.20 1.31 1.49 1.36 1.33 1.33 1.28 1.31

MUSC Central

N 8 5 7 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 7 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.40 1.29 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.44 1.43 1.43 1.22 1.00

Northwest

N 309 260 296 317 323 320 309 321 300 301 310 259 278 318 317 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.10 1.31 1.41 1.27 1.53 1.32 1.43 1.53 1.54 1.42 1.39 1.38 1.43

Southeast

N 13 13 12 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 12 13 14 14 Mean 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.14 1.21 1.21 1.14 1.14 1.29 1.50 1.21 1.17 1.23 1.29 1.21

N 330 278 315 339 346 343 332 344 323 324 333 278 298 341 340 Mean 1.05 1.17 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.26 1.51 1.31 1.41 1.52 1.53 1.41 1.39 1.38 1.41

MUSP Northwest

N 26 18 24 21 27 27 26 27 27 24 23 12 13 27 27 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.04 1.29 1.30 1.22 1.38 1.26 1.15 1.38 1.22 1.33 1.23 1.19 1.22

N 26 18 24 21 27 27 26 27 27 24 23 12 13 27 27 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.04 1.29 1.30 1.22 1.38 1.26 1.15 1.38 1.22 1.33 1.23 1.19 1.22

NMTT Coleman

N 92 79 86 90 92 90 90 92 87 91 91 80 81 92 89 Mean 1.18 1.59 1.24 1.48 1.83 1.51 1.71 1.45 1.49 1.59 1.52 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.65

N 92 79 86 90 92 90 90 92 87 91 91 80 81 92 89 Mean 1.18 1.59 1.24 1.48 1.83 1.51 1.71 1.45 1.49 1.59 1.52 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.65

OTHA Coleman

N 124 124 119 129 129 129 126 127 129 116 126 97 96 129 129 Mean 1.42 1.26 1.43 1.94 2.29 1.83 2.23 1.65 2.19 2.43 2.79 1.77 1.86 1.89 2.12

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 21 12/17/2010

Page 74: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 124 124 119 129 129 129 126 127 129 116 126 97 96 129 129 Mean 1.42 1.26 1.43 1.94 2.29 1.83 2.23 1.65 2.19 2.43 2.79 1.77 1.86 1.89 2.12

PHRA Coleman

N 235 230 231 237 238 238 235 237 237 222 232 214 215 238 237 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.12 1.34 1.38 1.29 1.46 1.27 1.26 1.75 1.43 1.32 1.35 1.38 1.32

N 235 230 231 237 238 238 235 237 237 222 232 214 215 238 237 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.12 1.34 1.38 1.29 1.46 1.27 1.26 1.75 1.43 1.32 1.35 1.38 1.32

PHTC Southwest

N 37 37 31 38 38 38 35 38 38 30 37 30 30 37 37 Mean 1.22 1.11 1.13 1.29 1.26 1.18 1.34 1.18 1.29 1.53 1.43 1.43 1.40 1.30 1.27

N 37 37 31 38 38 38 35 38 38 30 37 30 30 37 37 Mean 1.22 1.11 1.13 1.29 1.26 1.18 1.34 1.18 1.29 1.53 1.43 1.43 1.40 1.30 1.27

PLAB Coleman

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.89 1.00 1.11 1.67 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.00

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.89 1.00 1.11 1.67 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.00

POFI Central

N 88 82 74 89 89 88 88 88 87 84 87 62 61 87 89 Mean 1.15 1.12 1.24 1.46 1.64 1.44 1.69 1.43 1.56 1.74 1.69 1.71 1.70 1.56 1.69

Northeast

N 47 47 45 49 49 49 48 49 49 47 48 35 34 47 47 Mean 1.09 1.02 1.31 1.59 1.69 1.45 1.54 1.35 1.53 1.81 1.69 1.40 1.38 1.55 1.64

Northwest

N 66 67 65 65 66 66 65 66 65 64 66 34 34 63 64 Mean 1.11 1.09 1.17 1.35 1.50 1.29 1.49 1.27 1.37 1.63 1.42 1.62 1.59 1.33 1.44

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 22 12/17/2010

Page 75: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

POFI Southeast

N 67 67 63 65 66 67 65 67 61 65 64 42 39 66 67 Mean 1.07 1.04 1.19 1.37 1.70 1.30 1.38 1.57 1.44 1.75 1.48 1.36 1.38 1.50 1.63

Southwest

N 260 256 241 261 261 265 263 264 259 250 257 175 173 260 258 Mean 1.05 1.06 1.24 1.44 1.43 1.31 1.37 1.36 1.42 1.66 1.47 1.54 1.55 1.48 1.48

N 528 519 488 529 531 535 529 534 521 510 522 348 341 523 525 Mean 1.08 1.07 1.23 1.44 1.53 1.34 1.46 1.39 1.45 1.70 1.52 1.54 1.55 1.49 1.54

POFM Southwest

N 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 10 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.36 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.36 1.36 1.60 1.70 1.27 1.20

N 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 10 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.36 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.36 1.36 1.60 1.70 1.27 1.20

POFT Central

N 40 37 35 39 41 40 39 41 40 40 40 26 28 41 39 Mean 1.13 1.35 1.26 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.74 1.49 1.63 2.20 1.78 1.65 1.79 1.54 1.59

Northeast

N 8 8 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 7 7 8 9 Mean 1.13 1.63 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.22 1.22 1.75 1.56 1.43 1.29 1.13 1.22

Northwest

N 26 26 23 27 27 27 27 27 27 25 27 15 16 27 27 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.52 1.74 1.85 1.74 2.04 1.70 1.89 1.92 1.59 2.27 2.38 1.59 1.81

Southeast

N 38 32 34 36 40 39 40 40 40 39 39 22 21 40 40 Mean 1.05 1.06 1.26 1.53 1.25 1.46 1.38 1.30 1.53 1.67 1.38 1.45 1.52 1.45 1.33

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 23 12/17/2010

Page 76: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

POFT Southwest

N 116 113 106 117 118 119 114 118 117 109 115 78 73 119 119 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.25 1.52 1.54 1.39 1.56 1.42 1.62 1.83 1.66 1.73 1.78 1.53 1.69

N 228 216 204 228 235 234 229 235 233 221 230 148 145 235 234 Mean 1.10 1.18 1.28 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.61 1.43 1.62 1.88 1.62 1.72 1.79 1.51 1.61

PSTR Central

N 183 187 175 181 190 187 186 189 186 176 184 188 185 188 189 Mean 1.04 1.01 1.10 1.24 1.22 1.14 1.20 1.16 1.23 1.53 1.31 1.24 1.21 1.19 1.17

N 183 187 175 181 190 187 186 189 186 176 184 188 185 188 189 Mean 1.04 1.01 1.10 1.24 1.22 1.14 1.20 1.16 1.23 1.53 1.31 1.24 1.21 1.19 1.17

PTAC Northeast

N 100 104 102 106 108 107 108 107 105 104 105 96 94 109 104 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.20 1.34 1.49 1.36 1.44 1.26 1.36 1.46 1.32 1.33 1.52 1.31 1.34

N 100 104 102 106 108 107 108 107 105 104 105 96 94 109 104 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.20 1.34 1.49 1.36 1.44 1.26 1.36 1.46 1.32 1.33 1.52 1.31 1.34

PTHA Coleman

N 202 185 195 205 205 204 204 204 197 202 202 180 180 203 200 Mean 1.05 1.21 1.10 1.44 1.56 1.53 1.56 1.67 1.59 1.61 1.56 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.57

N 202 185 195 205 205 204 204 204 197 202 202 180 180 203 200 Mean 1.05 1.21 1.10 1.44 1.56 1.53 1.56 1.67 1.59 1.61 1.56 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.57

PTRT Northeast

N 135 140 139 147 147 145 143 147 138 144 144 81 81 147 144 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.12 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.38 1.22 1.30 1.60 1.42 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.38

N 135 140 139 147 147 145 143 147 138 144 144 81 81 147 144 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.12 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.38 1.22 1.30 1.60 1.42 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.38

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 24 12/17/2010

Page 77: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

RADR Coleman

N 230 206 205 214 233 207 214 231 229 200 209 165 152 229 233 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.27 1.47 1.60 1.49 1.68 1.52 1.72 1.68 1.44 1.36 1.37 1.56 1.69

N 230 206 205 214 233 207 214 231 229 200 209 165 152 229 233 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.27 1.47 1.60 1.49 1.68 1.52 1.72 1.68 1.44 1.36 1.37 1.56 1.69

RELE Southwest

N 33 5 32 24 34 34 30 34 34 27 27 6 6 34 34 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.06 1.07 1.03 1.06 1.48 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03

N 33 5 32 24 34 34 30 34 34 27 27 6 6 34 34 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.06 1.07 1.03 1.06 1.48 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03

RNSG Coleman

N 1033 1029 982 1046 1075 1030 1055 1072 983 982 916 743 727 1060 1065 Mean 1.18 1.19 1.31 1.74 1.82 1.76 1.94 1.73 1.69 1.88 1.71 1.63 1.70 1.70 1.89

N 1033 1029 982 1046 1075 1030 1055 1072 983 982 916 743 727 1060 1065 Mean 1.18 1.19 1.31 1.74 1.82 1.76 1.94 1.73 1.69 1.88 1.71 1.63 1.70 1.70 1.89

RSPT Coleman

N 123 119 119 127 127 127 127 126 128 124 126 97 96 128 127 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.26 1.57 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.29 1.27 1.45 1.37 1.41 1.44 1.38 1.46

N 123 119 119 127 127 127 127 126 128 124 126 97 96 128 127 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.26 1.57 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.29 1.27 1.45 1.37 1.41 1.44 1.38 1.46

RSTO Central

N 84 81 76 84 86 85 85 86 83 80 80 45 43 86 82 Mean 1.20 1.31 1.37 1.51 1.63 1.51 1.54 1.34 1.37 1.54 1.48 1.40 1.37 1.53 1.72

N 84 81 76 84 86 85 85 86 83 80 80 45 43 86 82 Mean 1.20 1.31 1.37 1.51 1.63 1.51 1.54 1.34 1.37 1.54 1.48 1.40 1.37 1.53 1.72

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 25 12/17/2010

Page 78: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

RTVB Central

N 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Northwest

N 186 154 176 186 189 190 185 191 182 182 182 140 146 189 188 Mean 1.13 1.24 1.20 1.57 1.60 1.50 1.70 1.50 1.62 1.74 1.71 1.60 1.66 1.49 1.74

Southeast

N 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Southwest

N 25 24 25 24 26 25 25 26 25 25 25 18 21 26 25 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.08 1.33 1.38 1.20 1.36 1.19 1.44 1.64 1.68 1.22 1.38 1.31 1.32

N 222 188 210 221 226 226 221 228 218 218 218 168 177 226 224 Mean 1.11 1.21 1.19 1.52 1.55 1.44 1.63 1.44 1.57 1.72 1.67 1.52 1.59 1.45 1.66

SCIT Coleman

N 29 28 28 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 29 13 13 30 30 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.11 1.37 1.50 1.23 1.70 1.23 1.36 1.83 2.03 1.62 1.69 1.23 1.40

Northeast

N 12 9 12 11 13 13 10 12 12 10 12 13 13 13 13 Mean 1.25 1.33 1.00 1.27 1.46 1.46 1.70 1.25 1.25 1.80 1.50 1.46 1.69 1.46 1.62

N 41 37 40 41 43 43 40 42 40 40 41 26 26 43 43 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.08 1.34 1.49 1.30 1.70 1.24 1.33 1.83 1.88 1.54 1.69 1.30 1.47

SLNG Central

N 124 98 121 118 125 124 119 124 118 113 123 37 39 125 124 Mean 1.11 1.19 1.16 1.31 1.40 1.34 1.54 1.36 1.41 1.52 1.65 1.43 1.36 1.38 1.52

N 124 98 121 118 125 124 119 124 118 113 123 37 39 125 124

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 26 12/17/2010

Page 79: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.11 1.19 1.16 1.31 1.40 1.34 1.54 1.36 1.41 1.52 1.65 1.43 1.36 1.38 1.52

SOLR Northeast

N 12 7 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 5 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.71 1.09 1.33 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.33 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.25

N 12 7 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 5 5 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.71 1.09 1.33 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.33 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.25

SRGT Coleman

N 289 275 271 293 297 293 296 297 283 292 294 242 241 296 294 Mean 1.15 1.15 1.21 1.50 1.69 1.52 1.68 1.62 1.77 1.93 1.93 1.60 1.83 1.64 1.67

N 289 275 271 293 297 293 296 297 283 292 294 242 241 296 294 Mean 1.15 1.15 1.21 1.50 1.69 1.52 1.68 1.62 1.77 1.93 1.93 1.60 1.83 1.64 1.67

TRVM Central

N 62 59 57 59 61 62 62 61 62 61 60 28 26 62 61 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.14 1.36 1.36 1.31 1.37 1.26 1.24 1.62 1.43 1.46 1.58 1.26 1.23

N 62 59 57 59 61 62 62 61 62 61 60 28 26 62 61 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.14 1.36 1.36 1.31 1.37 1.26 1.24 1.62 1.43 1.46 1.58 1.26 1.23

VNSG Coleman

N 526 516 514 523 532 517 522 528 523 503 516 298 295 524 517 Mean 1.15 1.12 1.23 1.58 1.73 1.49 1.86 1.45 1.58 1.71 1.71 1.52 1.60 1.56 1.72

N 526 516 514 523 532 517 522 528 523 503 516 298 295 524 517 Mean 1.15 1.12 1.23 1.58 1.73 1.49 1.86 1.45 1.58 1.71 1.71 1.52 1.60 1.56 1.72

VTHT Northwest

N 127 126 126 134 134 135 134 135 130 128 135 104 102 129 130 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.02 1.16 1.12 1.11 1.26 1.10 1.14 1.13 1.17 1.11 1.09 1.14 1.11

N 127 126 126 134 134 135 134 135 130 128 135 104 102 129 130 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.02 1.16 1.12 1.11 1.26 1.10 1.14 1.13 1.17 1.11 1.09 1.14 1.11

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 27 12/17/2010

Page 80: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2010 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

WIND Northeast

N 6 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00

N 6 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00

WLDG Central

N 107 112 110 119 119 118 119 119 119 116 118 118 117 119 115 Mean 1.23 1.17 1.15 1.43 1.43 1.37 1.60 1.30 1.50 1.55 1.45 1.23 1.39 1.43 1.39

N 107 112 110 119 119 118 119 119 119 116 118 118 117 119 115 Mean 1.23 1.17 1.15 1.43 1.43 1.37 1.60 1.30 1.50 1.55 1.45 1.23 1.39 1.43 1.39

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Fall2010-WFC.pdf 28 12/17/2010

Page 81: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College SEOI – Instructor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

INSTRUCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Specify an individual and location for the student proctor to return completed surveys, usually a department or campus office. 2. Recruit a student proctor to conduct the survey. Review with the student proctor their directions as the proctor (see Student Proctor's Directions). 3. Give the survey packet to the student proctor. Inform the student proctor about the return

of the surveys (name of individual and location). In order to ensure proper handling of SEOI forms, be sure to give the student proctor the envelope in which the survey materials were received. This is the return envelope.

4. Write your name and the Class number (not the course number) on the blackboard.

Explain to your students that the purpose of this survey is to improve certain aspects of the course and to help you improve the way you teach. Please be sure to explain that the survey is anonymous. Under no circumstances will the instructor know the student’s identity. Introduce the student proctor to the class.

5. Leave the room and do not return until the students have completed and turned in their surveys to the student proctor. The proctor is responsible for turning the materials in. Please make sure the student proctor understands where to turn in the survey packet.

If you have any questions regarding these directions please call 713-718-6259

Page 82: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College SEOI – Proctor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

STUDENT PROCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Make sure that the Class number that the instructor wrote on the board matches the class

number on the survey packet. After the instructor has left the room, pass out both sheets of the Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) survey. Keep any extra forms in your possession.

2. Read “Statement of Intent” to the students:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction. Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your and class instruction.

3. Read the following instructions to the students:

• Use only a #2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen. • Write the instructor’s name and bubble in the Class number in the upper

right corner of the Questionnaire and the Written Comments sheet, if used. (Check to see that this is being done properly.)

• Fill out the Questionnaire independently, without consultation with other students. • Do not sign your name or leave any marks of identification on the answer sheet. • If this is a lecture class, you do not need to complete Section III. If this is a lab, clinical, workshop or practicum class complete all sections. • Written comments are optional but very much encouraged.

4. When students have completed the survey, collect the forms, place them face up in the

same direction, and place both completed and unused forms into the original envelope and close it.

5. Return the envelope (containing all forms) to the location and individual specified by

your instructor. (This is most likely the department or campus secretary) Do not return the forms to the instructor.

Page 83: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

CLASSNUMBER

Instructor's Name:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your

instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction.

Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your instructor and class instruction.

Statement of Intent:

MARKING INSTRUCTIONS

Part I. Evaluation of Instruction[To be completed by all students.]

The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated.The textbook used for this course is suitable.Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course enhanced my learning of the subject matter.

1.2.3.

` ` ` `

` ` ` `

` ` ` `

Yes Neutral NoNo Basis forJudgement

OFFICE USE ONLY: ````````````

Use a No. 2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen only.

Erase cleanly any answer you wish to change.

Part II. Evaluation of Instructor[To be completed by all students.]

The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course.The instructor communicates clearly.The assignments were relevant to the course.My grades are an indication of my learning.The instructor treats students with respect.

4.

5.6.7.8.

CORRECT: ~

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

The instructor is available for student consultation.The instructor grades impartially.The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work.

9.10.11.

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part III. Lab Evaluation [To be completed by students enrolled in a laboratory or clinical class.]

The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical.The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture.

12.

13.` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part IV. Overall Evaluation[To be completed by all students.]

The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process.I would recommend this instructor to other students.

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part V. Library Resources[To be completed by all students.]

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

14.

15.

The HCCS library resources were adequate for the needs of this course.If provided, the library instruction received for this course was adequate.

LR1.

LR2.

DRC ScanDocs™ 9076-54321

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)

Houston Community CollegeOffice of Institutional Research

Page 84: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

INFORMATION SHEET - STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION (SEOI) PROGRAM

• TOTAL - The "TOTAL " row shown reflects the total number of students in a specific course who responded to each item. The numbers underneath "TOTAL" correspond to the items on the

HOW TO READ THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUCTOR REPORT

Your individual evaluation report contains the following information: • Name, Class Number (CRN), Course Title, Course Number • Question identification numbers (Q01 – Q15) appear across the top of the evaluation report. The

numbers correspond with the items on the standard questionnaire forms.

answer scale for the standard questionnaire.

Values for the answer scale to Questions 01-03:

1 = YES 2 = NEUTRAL 3 = NO 4 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

Values for the answer scale to Questions 04-15

:

1 = STRONGLY AGREE 2 = AGREE 3 = NEUTRAL 4 = DISAGREE 5 = STRONGLY DISAGREE 6 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

• MEAN - Averaged scores for each questionnaire item per individual class. At the bottom of the last page for each report, you will find cumulative statistics which provide the following information: • TOT. FREQ (total frequency) - Indicates the cumulative sum of students from your combined classes who

responded to each item. • TOTAL MEAN - Indicates combined mean scores for each questionnaire item for all your classes. • SYST MEAN – Indicates the combined mean scores on each questionnaire item for your discipline across the

entire college system. NOTE: If you taught more than one course during the semester, the data for those courses appear on the printout under the respective course numbers. Now, turn to the other side of this sheet for an illustration of how to read your report.

Page 85: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students Also provided to students with the questionnaires

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM STUDENT EVALUATION REPORT - BY INSTRUCTOR

NAME CRN

MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.25 1.25 1.12 0 0 0

Q01 Q02 Q03 Q4 ……. Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 DOE, J. M. 54321 ABCD 2301 TOTAL 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

TOT. FREQ 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.12 1.87 ……. 1.12 0 0 0 SYST MEAN 1.85 1.20 1.19 1.85 1.17 0 0 0

FOR QUESTIONS 01 - 03: Look at the TOTAL Now look under the column Q01: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

one. • Three students answered "Yes" to Question 1. • Three students answered "Neutral" to Question 1. • Two students answered "No" to Question 1. • None of the students answered "No Basis for

Judgement" to Question 1. There are four possible answers to Q1-Q3, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

FOR QUESTIONS 04 - 15: Look at the TOTAL.

Now look under the column Q04: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

four. • Three students answered "Strongly Agree" to

Question 4. • Three students answered "Agree" to Question 4. • Two students answered "Neutral" to Question 4 • None of the students answered "Disagree",

"Strongly Disagree", or "No Basis for Judgement" to Question 4. There are six possible answers to Q4-Q15, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

Look at the TOT. FREQ row that (number of responses). Now look under column Q01: • The total number of responses for all classes taught by the instructor is eight. In the example, the number for the

cumulative statistic is the same because the instructor only taught one class. For an instructor who taught more than one class, the cumulative statistics would reflect the total responses received from all students taught during the semester.

The System mean is the cumulative average for all instructors from the appropriate teaching area who participated in the program during the semester. These figures provide comparative performance information.