4
7.0 RESULTS TIME (min) R1 (mS) R2 (mS) R3 (mS) 0 0.164 0.170 0.172 3 12.150 8.920 3.280 6 7.800 9.250 5.290 9 5.110 6.980 6.670 12 3.450 5.630 7.040 15 2.350 4.080 6.880 18 1.429 3.160 6.060 21 1.000 2.380 5.290 24 0.720 1.787 4.490 27 0.526 1.300 3.700 30 0.400 0.971 2.910 33 0.310 0.741 2.310 36 0.258 0.573 1.817 39 0.227 0.458 1.427 42 0.206 0.370 1.138 45 0.193 0.306 0.902 48 0.183 0.259 0.704 51 0.177 0.229 0.555 54 0.173 0.207 0.438 57 0.169 0.198 0.363 60 0.169 0.187 0.310 63 0.168 0.187 0.264 66 0.166 0.181 0.235 69 0.166 0.177 0.212

Results and Discussion of CSTR In Series

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The analyzer part

Citation preview

7.0 RESULTS

7.0 RESULTS

TIME (min)R1 (mS)R2 (mS)R3 (mS)

00.1640.1700.172

312.1508.9203.280

67.8009.2505.290

95.1106.9806.670

123.4505.6307.040

152.3504.0806.880

181.4293.1606.060

211.0002.3805.290

240.7201.7874.490

270.5261.3003.700

300.4000.9712.910

330.3100.7412.310

360.2580.5731.817

390.2270.4581.427

420.2060.3701.138

450.1930.3060.902

480.1830.2590.704

510.1770.2290.555

540.1730.2070.438

570.1690.1980.363

600.1690.1870.310

630.1680.1870.264

660.1660.1810.235

690.1660.1770.212

Figure 7.1: Graph of conductivity of fluid versus time

8.0 DISCUSSION

The objective in this experiment is to determine the effect of pulse input to the concentration in CSTR reactor. Based on the Figure 7.1, the graph of conductivity versus time was plotted. The value of conductivity was recorded in each 3 minutes time intervals.

In each reactor in series in pulse input, the concentration was increased by function of time. Then, it achieved peak concentration at certain time interval before dropped to concentration=0. It can be seen through the graph in Figure 7.1 which first reactor achieved steeper concentration curve rather than the second and third reactor. This is because the diluted sodium chloride enters the reactor 1 first and then reactor 2, 3 bypass with deionised water containing deionised water flow into the reactors. Thus, lead the concentration of sodium chloride decreased as the deionised water was not fully removed during the flow.

Residence time-distribution function is used to describe on how much feed have spent in the reactor (Fogler, 2006). Yet in this experiment, it only used to describe how much degree of concentration response to pulse input CSTRs in series. As time increased, concentration of three reactors almost same which is 0.166 (mS/cm), 0.177 (mS/cm) and 0.212 (mS/cm) respectively for reactor 1, 2 and 3 after 69 minutes.

Due to graph, the inlet concentration of three reactors may different because of the flow rate that not constant at 150mL/min. The reading of conductivity at the final minutes cannot be same as the entering sodium chloride due to the fixed volume used in tank which is 20L. If the volume used is more than 20L, the final value of conductivity for all three reactors may get as same as the initial one which is 0.164 (mS/cm) for reactor 1, 0.170 (mS/cm) for reactor 2 and 0.172 (mS/cm) for reactor 3.

REFERENCE

- H. Scott Fogler (2006), Chemical Reaction Engineering, Fourth Edition Pearson International Edition, Pearson Education Inc.

- Solteq Engineering (2013), Equipment for Education and Research, Continuous Stirred Tanks Reactor