Upload
blaze-phelps
View
33
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Restructuring the System of Agricultural Statistics in Hungary. MEXAI 2-4 November 2004 Cancun Éva Laczka Ph.D. HUNGARIAN CENTRAL STATISTICAL OFFICE. Hungary. Total area 93 000 km 2 Population 10 million. HUNGARY. Agriculture in the GDP 3 percent - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Restructuring the System of Agricultural Statistics in Hungary
MEXAI2-4 November 2004
Cancun
Éva Laczka Ph.D.
Agriculture in the GDP 3 percent
Food industry in the GDP 4 percent
Agricultural land area 63 percent
Employees in Agriculture 6 percent
Number of units (2003)– 7 600 agricultural enterprises– 766 000 households
Hungarian Agriculture
Agricultural Censuses
189519351972198119912000
1872 Vineyard
1959 Orchard1965 Vineyard
2001 Orchard and vineyard
The main characteristics of the surveys (1950–2000)
Yearcensus survey census survey census survey census survey census survey census survey
195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000
Annual survey 4 monthly surveyQuarterly surveyGeneral cesus
Censuses and surveys on Agriculture (1950-2000)
Enterprises Private holdingsLand use Crop production Livestock Land use Crop production Livestock
Regular surveys 2003
enterprisesprivate
holdings
Expenditures of agricultural producers 100 annual
Report on procurements 70% 70 monthly
Livestock market report 40% 40 monthly
Market supply and reporting 40% 40monthly (weekly)
Balance of agricultural trade 80% 80 annual
Volume of feedingstuff sales 70% 70 quarterly
Sales prices of fertilizers 70% 70 quarterly
Sales prices of pesticides 70% 70 quarterly
Sales prices of veterinary products 70% 70 quarterly
Agricultural and Forestry services 70% 70Agricultural Census 2000
Coverage, %
Expert estimation
Notes
Agricultural data collection system
Denomination
Data collection regarding to
(Agro monetary data)
Census
Sample survey Purchasers, processing companies
Expert estimation Retailers of means of agricultural production
Regular surveys 2003
enterprisesprivate
holdings
Land area and sown area, 31 May 6% about 85 annual
Yield of cereals 5% about 85. annual
Yield of main crops about 85. annual
Production of crops and vegetables, utilisation and net sales
5% about 85. annual
Fruit and vine-growing, -planting, -grubbing, -utilisation and net sales
5% about 85. annual
Livestock 1 April, 1 August, 1 December 7% about 99.every 4 month
Changes in livestock, production of slaughter animals and animal products, utilisation and net sales
7% about 90. annual
Poultry hatching 5% 100 monthly
Milk, milk products 100 monthly
Farm Structure Survey 35% 100every 2-3 year
Agricultural data collection system 2003
Coverage, %
Expert estimation
Denomination
Data collection regarding to
Notes
(Physical data)
Census
Sampley survey
Expert estimation
Milestones of the SNA and EAA
1855 first national income and assets
1950 national balance sheets in material terms
1960 national accounts in material terms and according to the SNA
1990 SNA only
1994 Regional GDP
1996 Quarterly GDP
1999 EAA
2003 Regional EAA
Data resources of the SNA and EAA
Physical data
Price statistics
Gross production value
Production Balance sheets
A few new surveys
Administrative data
EU requirement
Member States have to fix the threshold at a level excluding only the smallest holding which together contribute 1 percent or less to the total SGM
Thresholds applied in Hungary
1972 1981 1991 1994 2003
Total arable land area, hectare 0,15 0,15 0,15 0,15 0,15
Orchard, vineyard, garden, hectare 0,08 0,08 0,08 0,08 0,05
Cattle, heads 1 1 1 1 1
Pig, heads 1 1 1 1 1
Horse, heads 1 1 1 1 1
Sheep, heads 1 1 1 1 1
Poultry, heads 50 50 50 50 50
Bee colonies, pc 20 20 25 25 5
Rabbit, heads 20 20 25 25 25
Other small animals, heads – – 25 25 25
Denomination(year of the census)
Thresholds applied in the Censuses of 1972-2003
The main characteristics of the households
60 % produce for family consumption
10 % produce for market
30 % produce for family consumption and market
Are the households farms in economic terms ?
number of farms SGM 0–1 EUME 81,2 15,3 1–2 EUME 9,4 7,7 2 EUME – 9,4 77,0 Total 100,0 100,0
SizeCoverage, %
Distribution of farms 2003
Conclusion
Agricultural statistics must
– be in line with the users’ needs
– follow the changes
– fulfil the information needs of SNA,EAA
– be comparable (time, methodology, specific features)
– be cheep, efficient