Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION#
BEFORE THE COMMISSION
------------....----------------
In the Matter of |
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE [ Docket No. 50-333*
OF NEW YORK ,
(James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear !*
Power Plant) ,*
-------------------------------
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'SANSWER TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REQUIRINGIMPLEMENTATION OF CATEGORY "A" REQUIREMENTSFOR THE JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWERPLANT
On January 2, 1980 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's
Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation issued an
order to show cause requiring that the Power Authority of the
State of New York (" Authority") demonstrate why, by January 31,
1980, it should not implement all of the " Category A" require-
ments of NUREG-0578 as supplemented by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission's ("Commis sion 's " ) letters dated September 13, 1979
and October 30, 1979.
The Authority submits that it has complied with all such
applicable requirements as of January 1, 1980, except for require-
ment 2.1.3.a which concerns installation of equipment to provide a
direct indication of pressure relief valve position. With respect
to this requirement, the Authority has ordered the necessary equip-
ment but it is not presently available. The Authority expects
that the nectasary equipment will be available in March 1980.
1816 273'8001280
-2--
RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
With respect to the allegations of Paragraph I
of the order to show cause, the Authority admits each of
the allegations.
With respect to the allegations of Paragraph II,
the Authority admits each of the allegations, except the
Authority denies knowledge or information sufficient toadmit or deny what the Commission has concluded concerning
prompt implementation of certain actions.
With respect to the allegations of Paragraph III,
the Authority admits each of the allegations insofar as they
apply to the Authority and denies knowledge or information
sufficient to respond to the allegations as they affect or
apply to other licensees. The Authority expects, based on
its current information and the undertakings made to it by
vendors and contractors, that a thirty day period after
delivery of equipment is a reasonable and practical time to
complete installation of such equipment and that all equip-
in quest,on should be delivered and installed by June 1, 1980.
The Authority denies knowledge or information sufficient to
respond to the allegation that implementation by January 31,
1980 is necessary to provide continued assurance of public
health and safety.
With respect to the allegations in Paragraph IV,~
the Authority respectfully refers the Commission to the
following demonstration:
1816 274'.
.
-3-
,
DEMONSTRATION OF UNAVAILABILITY OF NECESSARY EQUIPMENT
Equipment Description:
The Authority has purchased a safety relief valve
monitoring system from Babcock and Wilcox, Power Generation
Division ("B&W"). The system consists of an acoustical
monitor mounted on each valve, a charge amplifier, signal
conditioning equipment and a control cabinet to be located
in the control room. Associated cabling has been purchased
separately.
Equipment Fabrication and Delivery:
The critical path item in fabrication of the monitor-
ing system is the control cabinet. The Authority has been
informed by B&W that the cabinet is NEMA 12 design, manufac-
tured by Hoffman Engineering Company and will be qualified
to IEEE-344. The earliest anticipated receipt of the cabinet
by B&W is February 23, 1980. B&W must install the electrical
components and wiring in the cabinet and ship it to the site.
On this basis, B&W's earliest estimate of date of delivery is
March 15, 1980. A copy of a letter to the Authority from B&W
detailing B&W's schedule is attached as Exhibit "1". The
Authority is monitoring the progress of B&W and where possible
will continue to expedite fabrication and delivery.
Installation:
The Authority will install the direct relief valve
indication system within 30 days of receipt of the equipment
unless it appears that the 1980 refueling outage will begin.
.
within the 30 days. If this should occur, the installation
1816 215.
.
_4
.
will be scheduled consistent with other outage activities
and will be completed prior to plant start-up.
Public Health and Safety Implications:
The Authority has proposed a reasonable schedule
for implementing the relief valve indication system andbelieves that, pending installation, public health and
safety are adequately protected because of the following
considerations:
1. The relief valves at the FitzPatrick plant
serve the safety functions of overpressure
protection and backup to a single high pressure
coolant injection system. Therefore, they are
not isolable. Post accident or post-event response
by operators of a BWR are chiefly governed by
reactor vessel level instrumentation in order toSuch instrumentation wasassure core coverage.
not present in the PWR design of TMI.
2. At the FitzPatrick plant there currently are
temperature elements at each relief valve discharge
which give indication of individual relief valveopening and which can give indication of slow leak-
ages through temperature trend analyses.
The Authority's procedures for stuck open relief3.
valves and small break LOCA's can be implemented
without the proposed relief valve indication system.Relief valves in BWR's are frequently used in miti-4.
gating plant transients. The Authority's letter
1816 276
.
-5-
.
to the Commission dated October 22, 1979 provided a
history of events where relief valves have
stuck open. In each of the 50 events the reactor
was depressurized, the stuck valve was repaired
or replaced and the plant placed back into service.
At the James A. FitzPatrick plant eight (8) out
of eleven (11) relief valves have been modifiedto a design which has a history of being less
susceptable to being stuck open and the remaining
three (3) will be modified during the 1980 re-
fueling outage.
WHEREFORE, the Authority believes that it has complied
with all of the requirements of the order to show cause for
the James A. FitzPatrick plant. All of the " Category A"
requirements of NUREG-0578 have been met with the exception
of the installation of positive indicators for the safety relief
valves. The positive indicators,which are currently unavailable,will be installed within thirty (30) days of receipt of materials.
In the event that the plant is shut down for refueling prior
to termination of the thirty (30) day period, installation of
the positive indicators will be completed prior to re-starting
the plant. Should the Commission require implementation on
a schedule other than as set forth in this answer, the Authority.
reserves its right to request a hearing on such schedule.,
1816 277Re,spectfully s,ubmitted
THbShS R. F5E'
General CounselPower Authority of the State ofNew York
10 Columbus CircleJanuary 22, 1980 New York, New York 10019(212) 397-6200
EXHIBIT I
. .
Babcock & Wilcox %,c~.mc.'
'
P.o. Bos 3200. Lynchburg, Va. 24505
Tekvene:(Go4)384-5111
January ll, 1980.
$&cwer Authority State of New York
' 'a L M&10 Colunbus CircleNew York, NY 10019
Subjcct: Valve Monitoring SystemPASNY order no. 19083-79B&W no. 600-5206Delivery Infomation
Attention: Mr. Tom Hannan
Dear Mr. Hannan:'
The delivery of the subject Valve Monitoring System is being controlledby the following factors: -
- NEMA-12 cabinet - B&W has ordered NEMA-12 cabinets from Hoffman EngineeringCompany of Anoka, Minnesota. This cabinet was chosen to benefit from pre-viously perfonted seismic tests. Delivery of this cabinet is due in late
'February. ,
An NiC0 cabinet could be used however, this cabinet has not been testedand all plans to test equipment in the near future is based on the useof the Hoffman NEMA-12 equipment.
- Subsequent to receipt of the cabinet B&W will require approximatelythree weeks for assembly.
- The edgemeters are also long lead items, however, the rneters can beinstalled in the field after shipment.
B&W is targeting delivery of the subject hardware between March 15, 1980,,and March 30, 1980.
Please advise if you require further infomation on this subject.
Very truly yours,
THC BABC0CK & WILCOX COMPANY
M ~
,
J. M. Brunke iojr 37o-
Pr9 duct Manager 80iu ci U
JMB/kjb
The Batcoth & Witox Comyny I rey! het! IBM
.
.
AFFIRMATION
State of New York )) ss
County of New York )
The undersigned PAUL J. EARLY, being duly sworn,
hereby deposes and affirms as follows: that he is the Assistant
Chief Engineer-Projects of the Power Authority of the State ofNew York; that he has read the foregoing Answer To Order To
Show Cause Regarding Implementation of Category A Requirements
of NUREG 0578 for The James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant;
and that the facts set forth therein are true and correct to thebest of his knowledge, information and belief.
Dated: January 22, 1980.
I
'
'})!/
/t 'e '. ;r
PAU /J. EARLYf
!
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of January 1980.
4d 3Notafy~ Publib g // g
RUTH G. ZAPF-
Notary Public. State of New York
coM[sNNd"ctIe*sSia"rc$b |0}h 2[hNo. 30 4C6M23
My Commission expires:
~b' t-/ |> S o, /YPO
.
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERIC4NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
In the Matter of )Power Authority of the )
State of New York ) Docket No. 50-333James A. FitzPatrick ) O.L. No. DPR - 59Nuclear Power Plant )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing PowerAuthority of the State of New York's Answer to the Order toShow Cause Regarding Implementation of Category A RequirementsFor The James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant have been mailedfirst class, postage prepaid, this 22nd day of January 1980 toeach of the following:
Harold P. Denton, DirectorOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555 (1) original +
(20) copies
Samuel J. ChilkSecretaryU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555 (1) copy
Howard K. Shapar, Esq.Executive Legal DirectorU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D. C. 20555 (1) copy
/ ,
By M7 ' j~~ '
Angel /u.Mirtin,Esq.Power A thority of theState of New York
.
18115 280~