24
Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Response of the magnetosphereand ionosphere

to solar wind drivers (including complexity)

Mervyn FreemanBritish Antarctic Survey

Page 2: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

The importance of Bz

• IMF Bz is a strong influence on many properties of the magnetosphere and ionosphere

• (and their space weather impacts)– electrical currents (GIC)– and electric field -> Joule heating (satellite drag)– particle precipitation (GNSS)– auroral oval location– geosynchronous magnetic field and energetic particles

(satellite anomalies)– etc

Page 3: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

The importance of Bz - currents

• IMF Bz is a strong influence on auroral electrojet index, AE– peak magnitude of large-scale currents– hourly averages [Newell et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2007]

Page 4: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

The importance of Bz - location

• IMF Bz is a strong influence on the latitude of auroral currents– cusp = poleward edge of auroral oval at noon (instantaneous)– Bs = Bz when Bz < 0, Bs = 0 otherwise (hourly average)

[Newell et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2007]

Page 5: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Bz – not even half the answer

• IMF Bz explains only 37% of variance of the auroral electrojet index, AE– hourly averages– similarly for other quantities

[Newell et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2007]

Page 6: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Not only Bz

• IMF By, B, and solar wind v (and n) also important• still explains only 69% of variance of the auroral electrojet index, AE

– hourly averages

)2/(sin 3/83/23/4 TBvdtd

[Newell et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2007]

Page 7: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Not just about the solar wind

• magnetosphere and ionosphere produce the impact on satellites, power grids, etc, from the solar wind input

Page 8: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Add some physics – models

• Prediction is no better than assuming the average value of the observations over the event, PE = 0 (- - -)

2

2mod

1obs

obs xxPE

• PE = 1 is perfect prediction

[Pulkkinen et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2010]

Page 9: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Pulkkinen et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2010]

Page 10: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

3 challenges

• Non-linearity – chaos

• Memory – substorms

• Turbulence – intermittency

Page 11: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Non-linearity – chaos

• What is the sensitivity of the M-I response to uncertainties in the solar wind driver?

• How big and how quickly do errors grow?

Page 12: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

Page 13: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

Page 14: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

LFM/Wind

Page 15: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

LFM/THC

Page 16: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

Ampere

Page 17: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

[Merkin et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2013]

Page 18: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Memory – substorms

• Auroral electrojet index, AE, is influenced by past history of the IMF– 3-hour timescale, comparable to that of the substorm cycle

)2/(sin 3/83/23/4 TBvdtd

1

0

1 n

ii

i dtdwn

dtd

[Newell et al., J. Geophys. Res., 2007]

Page 19: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Memory – substorms

• Simple integrate-and-fire model explains substorm timing statistically

• But not so well individually due to non-linearity

fff

E

Time

Onsets

[Freeman and Morley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2004]

Page 20: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Minimal substorm model

1. Solar wind power input at magnetopause P accumulates energy in magnetotail E.

2. Unique minimum energy state for magnetosphere F exists for given solar wind state P.

3. Magnetotail can only move to lower energy state F when energy threshold C is exceeded.

),( BvPdt

dE

)(PgCF

CEFE when

P

E

F

Time

[Freeman and Morley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2004]

Page 21: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Turbulence – intermittency

• Wilder fluctuations on short timescales

• Dependent on large-scale state[Consolini and de Michelis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998]

Page 22: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Turbulence – intermittency

• Similar properties in space as well as time

• Wild fluctuations vary with spatial scale (and time scale)

[Consolini and de Michelis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998]

Page 23: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

3 solutions?

• Non-linearity, Memory, Turbulence challenges need:

• Models and Ensemble forecasting– represent evolving uncertainties from Sun to Earth

• Observations and Data assimilation– update prediction with latest information

• Scaling schemes– to handle unresolved scales and extremes

Page 24: Response of the magnetosphere and ionosphere to solar wind drivers (including complexity) Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey

Summary

• Bz is important• but ...

• it’s not even half the answer• magnetosphere and ionosphere produce the impact

from the solar wind input

• M-I observations, models, and research are just as vital