Upload
alka
View
70
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Responding to Comments. Janet Cox TMDL/Planning Communications Region 2. Today’s Presentation. Different types of comments Response strategy Organizing comments, and responses Preparing the Responses to Comments document Recirculation and comments on a recirculated SED. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
11
Responding to Responding to CommentsComments
Janet CoxJanet CoxTMDL/Planning CommunicationsTMDL/Planning Communications
Region 2Region 2
22
Today’s PresentationToday’s Presentation
Different types of commentsDifferent types of comments
Response strategyResponse strategy
Organizing comments, and responsesOrganizing comments, and responses
Preparing the Responses to Comments Preparing the Responses to Comments documentdocument
Recirculation and comments on a Recirculation and comments on a recirculated SEDrecirculated SED
33
Range of Comments Range of Comments on the SEDon the SED
Technical comments/questions about the Technical comments/questions about the proposed Basin Plan amendment or TMDLproposed Basin Plan amendment or TMDL
Cost/economics questionsCost/economics questions
Jurisdictional challengesJurisdictional challenges
Process comments/questions Process comments/questions
Opposition to governmental regulationOpposition to governmental regulation
General, non-specific criticism or unrelated General, non-specific criticism or unrelated issuesissues
CEQA comments: re: environmental impacts, CEQA comments: re: environmental impacts, mitigation, alternatives, checklist, CEQA process mitigation, alternatives, checklist, CEQA process
44
CEQA Scoping Comments CEQA Scoping Comments
No legal requirement to respond in No legal requirement to respond in writing if submitted before the writing if submitted before the published comment period…published comment period…
BUTBUT
Your environmental analysis must Your environmental analysis must demonstrate consideration of all demonstrate consideration of all CEQA scoping commentsCEQA scoping comments
55
Written CEQA Scoping Written CEQA Scoping CommentsComments
Respond in writing, along with all other Respond in writing, along with all other comment-period responsescomment-period responses
Not necessary to include a separate Not necessary to include a separate CEQA section in the RTC documentCEQA section in the RTC document
66
CEQA Comments Received CEQA Comments Received After the Comment PeriodAfter the Comment Period
State Board’s CEQA regulations require State Board’s CEQA regulations require that we respond to late CEQA commentsthat we respond to late CEQA comments
Water Board Administrative Procedures Water Board Administrative Procedures Manual cites federal public participation Manual cites federal public participation requirements: requirements:
““Responses to all significant comments, Responses to all significant comments, criticisms and suggestions must be prepared” criticisms and suggestions must be prepared”
77
Basin Planning RequirementBasin Planning Requirement
Basin Planning procedures: Basin Planning procedures:
Respond in writing to comments received Respond in writing to comments received earlier than 15 daysearlier than 15 days before Board adoption before Board adoption
Attempt to respond in writing, or at least Attempt to respond in writing, or at least respond verbally at the meeting, to comments respond verbally at the meeting, to comments received received within 15 dayswithin 15 days of the Board hearing of the Board hearing
This is the requirement until revised Water This is the requirement until revised Water Board regs are approvedBoard regs are approved
State Board CEQA Regs Title 23 CCR §3779
88
Responsiveness SummaryResponsiveness Summary
““Responses MUST indicate what changes were Responses MUST indicate what changes were made to the draft amendment or give the reason made to the draft amendment or give the reason for not changing the draft amendment as for not changing the draft amendment as recommended. Responses to comments must recommended. Responses to comments must demonstrate comprehension of the intent of the demonstrate comprehension of the intent of the comment, and consideration of the comment by comment, and consideration of the comment by giving the rationale if not accepting suggested giving the rationale if not accepting suggested changes to the regulatory languagechanges to the regulatory language.”.”
Administrative Procedures Manual Ch. 8, p. 30
99
Responsiveness SummaryResponsiveness Summary
Summarizes changes to the SED and any Summarizes changes to the SED and any information not reflected in Board packageinformation not reflected in Board package New or late accepted commentsNew or late accepted comments
ResponsesResponses
Indication if policy changed as a result, and Indication if policy changed as a result, and whywhy
To be added to the Admin Record and To be added to the Admin Record and posted on the website with final approved posted on the website with final approved documentsdocuments
1010
Example of CEQA Example of CEQA Comments and ResponsesComments and Responses
““I suggested an alternative – controlling I suggested an alternative – controlling mercury emissions in China – and you mercury emissions in China – and you ignored me!”ignored me!”
““CEQA requires that a reasonable range of CEQA requires that a reasonable range of alternatives be evaluated and that alternatives alternatives be evaluated and that alternatives be feasible. The SED evaluated the proposed be feasible. The SED evaluated the proposed project and three alternative approaches to project and three alternative approaches to controlling mercury inputs to the Bay. Although controlling mercury inputs to the Bay. Although controlling mercury emissions in China is highly controlling mercury emissions in China is highly desirable, it is not feasible for this project, desirable, it is not feasible for this project, because the Water Board does not have because the Water Board does not have jurisdiction or regulatory authority in China.” jurisdiction or regulatory authority in China.”
1111
Example of CEQA Example of CEQA Comments and ResponsesComments and Responses
““You held your meetings in a scary neighborhood at You held your meetings in a scary neighborhood at night, and I couldn’t come!”night, and I couldn’t come!”
““During TMDL development we held three public workshops, During TMDL development we held three public workshops, a CEQA scoping meeting, and a public hearing on adoption of a CEQA scoping meeting, and a public hearing on adoption of the TMDL. (list dates and times) As required by law, these the TMDL. (list dates and times) As required by law, these meetings were held in accessible locations within Water meetings were held in accessible locations within Water Board jurisdiction. Board staff consider the time and location Board jurisdiction. Board staff consider the time and location of meetings to maximize public participation. Contact of meetings to maximize public participation. Contact information is included in each official notice of a public information is included in each official notice of a public hearing, to assist people with special needs. However, it is not hearing, to assist people with special needs. However, it is not necessary to attend a public meeting in order to comment on necessary to attend a public meeting in order to comment on our public documents. We respond, officially and in writing, to our public documents. We respond, officially and in writing, to all comments that we receive in writing.”all comments that we receive in writing.”
1212
Response StrategyResponse Strategy
Take all comments seriouslyTake all comments seriously
Respond in a way that demonstrates your Respond in a way that demonstrates your understanding of the question, or lack…understanding of the question, or lack…
Explain your reasoningExplain your reasoning
Respond to CEQA comments in CEQA Respond to CEQA comments in CEQA context, using CEQA terms context, using CEQA terms
1313
Response StrategyResponse Strategy
Anticipate non-technical readers/Anticipate non-technical readers/listeners listeners
Be open to making requested text Be open to making requested text changes, as a courtesychanges, as a courtesy
““Thank you for your comment” or Thank you for your comment” or “Comment noted” is not an adequate “Comment noted” is not an adequate response!response!
1414
Organizing Comments and Organizing Comments and Responses: Possible CategoriesResponses: Possible Categories
CEQA/environmentalCEQA/environmental
ImplementationImplementation
Economic Economic
Technical/methodologyTechnical/methodology
JurisdictionJurisdiction
Basin Planning/TMDL processBasin Planning/TMDL process
Peer review/scientific justificationPeer review/scientific justification
GeneralGeneral
1515
Use a Spreadsheet to Use a Spreadsheet to Sort and QuoteSort and Quote
Advantages of a sortable matrix of commentsAdvantages of a sortable matrix of comments
Avoid restating the same pointAvoid restating the same point
Delegate types of responses to specific staffDelegate types of responses to specific staff
Track document development progressTrack document development progress
Quote comment directly whenever possibleQuote comment directly whenever possible
Sequential numbering helps in reassembly of Sequential numbering helps in reassembly of RTC documentRTC document
1616
Organizing Comments and Responses
1717
Preparing the RTC DocumentPreparing the RTC Document
Simplify the reader’s job of understanding Simplify the reader’s job of understanding the project, and your responsivenessthe project, and your responsiveness
RTC document should stand on its own RTC document should stand on its own with the BPA – these may be all some with the BPA – these may be all some people read, and they need to tell the storypeople read, and they need to tell the story
1:1 relation between comments and 1:1 relation between comments and responsesresponses
1818
Writing Style and ToneWriting Style and Tone
Your audience is non-technical: the public, Your audience is non-technical: the public, the Board, and the judgethe Board, and the judge
SEDs “shall be written in plain language …SEDs “shall be written in plain language …so that decision makers and the public can so that decision makers and the public can rapidly understand the documents” rapidly understand the documents” (CEQA Guidelines 15140)(CEQA Guidelines 15140)
Define technical terms, spell out acronymsDefine technical terms, spell out acronyms
Voice: Use first person plural, third person, Voice: Use first person plural, third person, NO second person. NO second person.
For the judge, cite relevant code and For the judge, cite relevant code and cite/provide evidencecite/provide evidence
1919
Format of the RTC DocumentFormat of the RTC Document
Consider an introduction summarizing key and Consider an introduction summarizing key and frequent comments, “master” responses -- APMfrequent comments, “master” responses -- APM
Try not to restate responsesTry not to restate responses
Refer to earlier comments; don’t refer forwardRefer to earlier comments; don’t refer forward
Use type styles to your advantage Use type styles to your advantage
Show changes stemming from comments in Show changes stemming from comments in underline/strikeout in the context of your underline/strikeout in the context of your responseresponse
2020
Recirculation Recirculation and Responding to and Responding to
Second-Round CommentsSecond-Round Comments
2121
Recirculation of the SEDRecirculation of the SED
Guidelines §15088
If, before adoption, new evidence arises If, before adoption, new evidence arises requiring substantial revisions to the SED, requiring substantial revisions to the SED, the SED should be recirculated the SED should be recirculated
New comment period required prior to New comment period required prior to adoption of revised SED adoption of revised SED
2222
New Information New Information Requiring RecirculationRequiring Recirculation
Changes in the project or environmental settingChanges in the project or environmental setting
A new significant environmental impactA new significant environmental impact
Substantial increase in the severity of an Substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact, if not mitigatedenvironmental impact, if not mitigated
New mitigation measure proposed, which the New mitigation measure proposed, which the Board declines to adoptBoard declines to adopt
Guidelines §15088.5Guidelines §15088.5
2323
New Information New Information NOTNOT Requiring Recirculation Requiring Recirculation
Mitigation measures … are added that are not Mitigation measures … are added that are not required by CEQA, do not create new significant required by CEQA, do not create new significant environmental effects, and are not necessary to environmental effects, and are not necessary to mitigate an avoidable significant effectmitigate an avoidable significant effect
The new information or document revision The new information or document revision “merely” clarifies or amplifies or makes “merely” clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications to the SEDinsignificant modifications to the SED
Mitigation measures are replaced with Mitigation measures are replaced with equivalent or more effective measuresequivalent or more effective measures
Guidelines Guidelines §15088.5§15088.5
2424
Responding to Comments on Responding to Comments on Recirculated DocumentsRecirculated Documents
If the SED is substantially revised and If the SED is substantially revised and recirculated for a new round of commentsrecirculated for a new round of comments
We must notify all commenters of the need to We must notify all commenters of the need to resubmit comments on recirculated resubmit comments on recirculated documentsdocuments
We need not respond in writing to first-We need not respond in writing to first-circulation comments.circulation comments.
Guidelines §15088.5(f) et seq.
2525
Responding to Comments on Responding to Comments on Recirculated DocumentsRecirculated Documents
If only part of the SED is revised and If only part of the SED is revised and recirculated, the lead agency may recirculated, the lead agency may requestrequest that that reviewers limit second-round comments to reviewers limit second-round comments to revised portions of the documents. Lead agency revised portions of the documents. Lead agency then responds in writing to: then responds in writing to:
All comments on unchanged sections of the first-All comments on unchanged sections of the first-round review documentsround review documents
All comments on revised sections of the recirculated All comments on revised sections of the recirculated documentsdocuments
Guidelines §15088.5
2626
Questions?Questions?