Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ResourceTrackingandManagement(RTM):
StateLevelResultsfromBihar
(2007-08to2013-14)
July2017
TheRTMConceptualFramework
ResourceMobilization
Whatisthepotentialforraisingmoreresourcesforhealth?Fromwhere?Whatdeterminestheresourceenvelopeatnationalandsub-nationallevels?
ResourceAllocation
Howarefundsallocatedtodifferentprogramsandfunctionsatnationalandsub-nationallevels?Whatfactorsdeterminetheallocationtoprimarycare?
ResourceUtilization
Aretheallocatedfundsbeingutilized?Whatfactorsdrivesuccessfulbudgetexecution?Whataretheexistingbottlenecks?
ResourceProductivity
Howeffectivelyareresourcesbeingtranslatedintoservices?Isdeliveryefficientandwhatcanbegainedfromefficiencyimprovementsintermsofvolumeandquality?
ResourceTargeting
Areinputsbenefitingtheintendedindividualsandpopulation?Ispublicspendingreachingthepoor?
Methods• Financialdata- Analysisisforyears2007-08to2013-14
• Streamsoffinancinganalyzed
Ø Treasuryroute(Fundspooledbythestatefromgeneraltaxation)
• ExpendituresincurredMajorcodes2210,4210(MedicalandPublicHealth),2211,4211(FamilyWelfare)underDemandforGrantno.20(HealthDepartment)
Ø GOItransfers(toSHS;andstatetreasuryforinfrastructureandmaintenanceforNHM)
Ø GOIOther(Centrallysponsoredschemes)
• BudgetTrackingTooldevelopedbyNHSRCendorsedbytheMOHFWwasusedtoestimateprimarycare.AllofNHMisconsideredprimarycareforthisstudyandanalysis.
IdentifyingPrimaryCareFunding:NHSRCTrackingToolkit
HierarchyLevel
BudgetLines/Heads ExamplewithCode
ExamplewithCode
Level 1 MajorHead MedicalandPublic Health–RevenueExpenditureHead(2210)
Level2 Sub-majorHead
Public HealthHead(06)
Level 3 MinorHead PreventionandControlofDiseases(101)
Level4 Sub-minorhead
NationalTBProgram(04) PRIMARYCARE
Level 5 DetailedHead DrugsandMedicines (60)
SourcesandRoutesTrackedforHealthFundsSource TreasuryRoute SocietyRoute Notes
State(1)
State’sownhealthbudget
(4)State’sshareofNHMbudget
(1) AllocationoftaxrevenuesbytheStateTreasurytohealthandcentralrevenuestransferstostates
(2) ApprovedNHMbudgetbasedonPIPtransferredbyGOItoStatetreasury
(3) GOIcontributiontohealthbudgetforCSS(non-NHM)
(4) Statecontributionof15%andnow25%ofapprovedPIPtransferredfromstatetreasurytoSHS
(5) GOIcontributiontoNHMbudgettransferredtoSHS
Center(GOI)
(2)NHMfundsforinfrastructure &maintenance
(5)GOIshareofNHMbudget
(3)OtherCentrallySponsoredSchemes
StateHealthBudget
10,68214,969 15,235 17,627
24,298 23,69527,2318,493
9,786 12,54712,739
13,45220,371
20,169
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
TotalHealthBudget(inRsmillion)
StateHealthBudget(excludingNHM)* NHM(allroutes)**
147% Total Health Budget:
• Rs 19,174 million (2007-08)
• Rs 47,401 million (2013-14)
• Increase of 147% over 7 years.
NHMasashareofTotalHealthBudget
56% 60% 55% 58% 64% 54% 57%
44% 40% 45% 42% 36% 46% 43%
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14StateHealthBudget(excludingNHM) NHM(allroutes):approvedbudget
Over the last 7 years
• On average NHM has contributed 42% of the THB
• Bihar has among the highest dependency on NHM.
• Share of NHM in the THB was at its highest at 46% in 2012-13,
SGHBandTGHBasashareofGSDP
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14SHB 1.17% 1.13% 1.02% 0.95% 1.08% 0.97% 0.93% THB 1.69% 1.74% 1.71% 1.49% 1.55% 1.50% 1.38%
0.00% 0.20% 0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20% 1.40% 1.60% 1.80% 2.00%
• DecliningtrendsinTGHB&SGHBasashareofGSDP,despiteeconomyofthestatewitnessingamongthehighestgrowthtrendinthecountry
• Substantialincreaseindemandforhealthservices- Fourfoldincreaseinpatientfootfallinhospitalsbetween2007-08&2013-14duetobetterinfrastructure– BiharEconomicSurvey,2014-15
ActualGovernmentExpenditureonHealth(Nominal)
INDICATORS 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Total Health Expenditure for Bihar(in Rs Millions) 14,720 19,439 18,677 23,028 26,898 30,411 34,036
State’s share in THE (in Rs Millions) 12,622(86%)
11,522(59%)
13,294(71%)
14,553(63%)
18,744(70%)
21,203(70%)
22,615(66%)
NHM expenditure (in Rs Millions) 3,826 10,927 7,839 14,186 11,074 13,589 11,936
Per Capita THE (in Rs) 159 207 196 238 274 306 338
Total Primary Care Expenditure (State & NHM)
10,273(70%)
14,109(73%)
12,603(67%)
17,049(74%)
17,586(65%)
20,278(67%)
22,253(65%)
Per Capita Primary Care (in Rs) 111 150 132 176 179 204 221
THE as a percent of State GSDP 1.29 1.37 1.15 1.13 1.11 1.04 0.99
Primary Care Expenditure as percent of State GSDP 0.90% 0.99% 0.77% 0.84% 0.72% 0.69% 0.65%
BiharTotalGovernmentHealthExpenditure
86%
59% 71% 63% 70% 70% 66%
14%
41% 29% 37% 30% 30% 34%
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Stateshare Centershare
• AverageState’sshareinTGHE:68%
BiharTotalHealthExpenditure(Byroute)
10,894 8,512 10,839 8,842
15,825 16,82222,100
3,826 10,927 7,839 14,186
11,07413,589
11,936
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
State(NonNHM) NHM
Increaseinexpenditure:131%over7years.Increaseinbudget:147%.
AnnualGrowthRateinTotalGovt.HealthExpenditure(bySourceofFinancing)
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14Stateshare -8.71% 15.38% 9.47% 28.80% 13.12% 6.66% Centershare 277.29% -32.00% 57.42% -3.79% 12.93% 24.03% THE 32.06% -3.92% 23.29% 16.81% 13.06% 11.92%
-50% 0%
50% 100% 150% 200%250% 300%
AnnualGrowthRateinHealthExpenditurebySources
Stateshare Centershare THE
TotalGovernmentPerCapitaExpenditureinBihar
136 122 139 150191 213 225
2384 56
88
8393
113
159
207196
238274
306
338
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
PercapitaStateHealthExpenditure PercapitaGoIexpenditureonhealth PercapitaTotalHealthExpenditure
Per capita health expenditure one of the lowest in the country
BiharHealthExpendituresbyLevelsofCare(TreasuryOnly)inRs.Million
AllocationsbyLevelsofCare 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
PrimaryCare 9,423(68%)
7,575(59%)
9,009(60%)
10,693(64%)
11,933(56%)
13,851(58%)
13,954(54%)
SecondaryCare 1,603 1,831 1,852 1,673 2,976 3,342 3,752
TertiaryCare 1,189 1,767 1,936 2,083 2,555 2,536 2,785
MedicalEducation 1,286 1,358 1,734 1,994 3,077 3,341 4,613
Administration 370 375 552 229 705 914 633
Total 13,870 12,906 15,083 16,672 21,246 23,984 25,736
PerCapitaPrimary(Rs.) 82 68 71 100 91 99 102PerCapitaPrimary(incl. NHM)(Rs.) 110 149 131 176 179 203 220
BiharExpenditurebyLevelsofCare(TreasuryOnly- 7yearsaverage)
2007-08to2013-14
Primary care 59%
Secondary care 13%
Tertiary care 12%
Medical Education
13%
Administration 3%
Largest share (59%) of the health expenditure through Treasury route is on Primary Care
ComparingGrowthRates:TotalGovt.PrimaryHealthExp.(TGPHE)&TotalGovt.HealthExpenditure(TGHE)
-20%
19% 19% 12%
16%
1%
-7%
17% 11%
27%
13% 7%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
ComparinggrowthrateofTGPHE&TGHE
TPCEgrowthrate THEgrowthrate
ExpenditureAllocationbyTypesofInputs(TreasuryOnly)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
HumanResource OperatingCost* Drugs&Pharmaceuticals
CapitalProjects Others**
• HR comprises highest share of expenditure
• Drugs, pharmaceuticals & consumables range between 5% to 5.5% across all the 7 years
ExpenditureAllocationbyTypesofInputs(NHMthroughStateHealthSocietyonly)
Programs/Othersinclude:Trainings,Servicedelivery,incentives,untiedfunds,IEC/BCC,monitoringandallothercostsrelatedtoservicedeliveryandprogramimplementationunderdifferentcomponentsofNHM
AreaswhereNHMhasbeenabletomakeanimpactonexpenditure:
• Program/servicedeliverycosts
• Drugs,pharmaceuticals&consumables
UtilizationRatesforTreasuryBudgets(ExpenditureinRs.Million)
UtilizationRate 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
HealthBudget(Treasury) 13,316 17,588 18,151 21,175 28,438 31,027 34,481
HealthExpenditure(Treasury)
13,870 12,906 15,083 16,672 21,246 23,984 25,736
HealthExpenditureagainstbudget*
104.17% 73.38% 83.1% 78.73% 74.71% 77.3% 74.64%
UtilizationRatesforNHM(ExpenditureinRs.Million)
UtilizationRate 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
TotalNHMApprovedbudget 8,493 9,786 12,547 12,739 13,452 20,371 20,169
TotalfundsavailableundertheNHMScheme(opening balance,interest,fundstransferredduringtheyear)
8577 17,388 17,642 20,931 22,899 33,423 30,880
TotalExpenditureIncurred 3,826 10,927 7,839 14,186 11,074 13,589 11,936
UtilizationagainstapprovedbudgetforNHM– (ENTIRESCHEME)– allroutes:TotalExpenditure/totalapprovedbudget
45.05% 111.66% 62.47% 111.35% 82.32% 66.71% 59.18%
UtilizationagainstfundsavailableforNHM– (ENTIRESCHEME)– allroutes:TotalExpenditure/totalfundsavailable
44.61% 62.84% 44.43% 67.77% 48.36% 40.66% 38.65%
NHM(SHS)underutilization– IMPACT
• IfSHSspends100%offundsavailable,increaseinTGHE:
• Bihar:49%
• UP:26%34,036
1,19,650
50,595
1,50,370
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
1,00,000
1,20,000
1,40,000
1,60,000
Bihar2013-14 UP2014-15
TGHE(inm
illionRs.)
ImpactofStateHealthSocietyU;liza;ononTotalGovernmentHealthExpenditure(TGHE)
CurrentTGHE TGHEifSHSspent100%
Reasonsforunderspending:CapacityandOperationalissues
NHMsystemdesignandhumancapacityfactors:
• Lackofleadershiptoconceiveandimplementaninnovation
• Riskaverseattitudesofthemanager
• Powerdynamicsatthelocallevel
• Capacitytoprocure(civil,medicines,HR)
• Lackofproperknowledgeofspendingguidelines
Wherethepurposeoftheexpendituresisexplicit:Betterutilizationrates; fore.g.-salaries,drugs
Budgetlinesthatrequirediscretionintheoptimaluseoffunds–utilizationislower,fore.g.- untiedgrants,MFP.
Reasonsforunderspending:CapacityandOperationalissues
Otherkeyoperationalreasons:
• DelaysinapprovalofplansfromGOI
• Consequentdelaysinreleasesoffunds
• Substantialprocurementdelays
• HRvacancies
• CAGauditteamin2013foundmorethan600JSYbeneficiarycheckslyingundeliveredfromthepreviousyear(2012).Reasonsfordelaysincludedelaysinreceiptoffundsandseveralbeneficiarieswithoutabankaccount.
Limitedleadershipcapacitytoconceiveandimplementinnovations:MissionFlexipool
42% 45%
7% 6%
63%
32%
106%
53%
RCHFlexipool MissionFlexipool Immunization&PP DiseaseControl
Budgetshares&utilizationbyNHMProgramComponentsMean(2011-12to2013-14)
Budgetshare BudgetUtilization
NHMflexipoolutilizationisconsistentlylow(includescorpusgrants,untiedgrantsetc);UP– Utilizationofimmunizationprogramishigh– expenditureonexplicitbudgetitems– vaccinesVerylowspendingondiseasecontrol– onlyhalfthefundsspentoutofanalreadyverylowbudget
51%
36%
8% 5%
69%
46%
59%
45%
RCHFlexiPool MissionFlexiPool Immunization&PP DiseaseControl
Budgetshares&utilizationbyNHMProgramComponentsMean(2011-12to2013-14)
Budgetshare BudgetUilization
UTTARPRADESHBIHAR
Limited leadership capacity to conceive and implement innovations: Mission Flexipool
DelaysinCivilWorks– lackofcapacity(Capacity&OperationalIssue)
§ Only5outof298constructionworkcouldbecompletedbetween2011&2015
§ 35areincompleteand258projectswereyettostarteventhoughSHSBtransferringRs.4461.7milliontotheBiharMedicalServicesandInfrastructureCorporation(BMSIC)betweenApril2011&February2014.
§ Utilizationofbudgetallocatedfornewconstruction/renovation:39%(2011-12),7%(2012-13and2013-14)
Limitedmedicineprocurementcapacity(Capacity&OperationalIssue)
§ Delaysinsupplyofdrugswerewidespread- delaysbasedonauditreports :
o 418daysinMadhubanidistrict,337daysinGayadistrict
o 168daysinEastChamparan,165daysinKishanganj
SomePolicyImplications
1)Consideralternateorinnovativemeansoffinancingpharmaceuticalexpenditure(ResourceProductivity):
• Buyinggenericdrugs
• Eliminatesupplier(middlemen)andbuydirectlyfrommanufacturers
• Poolingoffunds
2)Separatetreatmentofexpenditureunitsforreleaseoffundstoimproveutilizationoffunds(ResourceUtilization):
• Treatingtheexpenditureunitsindependentlywillenableallthoseunits,thatareabletospendthefundstimely,receivetherequiredfundspromptlywithouthavingtowaitforUtilizationCertificates(UCs)tobeaggregatedateachlevel(PHC/Block/Districtlevel).
SomePolicyImplications(ResourceUtilization)
3)Delinkthecapitalexpendituresfromroutineexpenditures.(ResourceUtilization)• A separationcouldfreetheroutinefundsflowfromthegettingblocked
byunspentbalancesundercapitalworksandprocurement.4)Improveexistingauditingprocessestoencourageinnovation.(ResourceUtilization)• Thecurrentapproachoffinancialauditneedstoshiftfromchecking
“compliancetoguidelinesanddirectives”to“demonstratingtransparencyandpositiveoutputs/outcome”.
• TheconcurrentauditscanaccommodatethisnewanglebymodifyingtheTORsofsuchauditorsappointedbytheStateHealthSociety.
PolicyImplications
5)Reconsidertheresourceinputallocationnormstoimprovehealthservicedeliveryoutputs• RedesigningtheexistinginstitutionalstructureandHRallocationnorms,given
Bihar’slessdevelopedinfrastructure,shouldbeconsidered.Redesigncouldbebasednotonlyonadministrativelevelandpopulationbutalsoonanelementthattakesintoaccountthe“time”toaccesshealthcare.
DataSources– RTMBihar
1. AuditedbalancesheetsofNHMfrom2007-08to2013-142. WebsiteoftheNHM,GovernmentofIndia:https://nrhm-
mis.nic.in/SitePages/Home.aspx3. PIPsandROPsofNHM4. FMRsofNHMatthestatelevel5. NHMStateProjectImplementationPlansforthestudyyears6. BudgetBooks– GovernmentofBihar7. Census2011,GovernmentofIndia8. PlanningCommission:http://planningcommission.gov.in9. ReserveBankofIndia:https://www.rbi.org.in10. WebsiteoftheMinistryofStatistics&ProgrammeImplementation,
GovernmentofIndia:http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/site/home.aspx11. BiharEconomicSurvey,2014-15