Resource Mobilization Orientation & Workshop

8/13/2019 Resource Mobilization Orientation & Workshop

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resource-mobilization-orientation-workshop 1/32

Resource Mobilization

Orientation & Workshop:Preparation of Enhanced Project/Program/Activity Design

ALEX C. ROLDAN, CESO VProvincial Director – DILG Davao del Norte

DANILO M. HERNANDEZCLGOO IV – DILG Panabo City





•ARTICLE X OF THE 1987 CONSTITUTION “SUPERVISORY

POWER OF THE PRESIDENT LOCALGOVERNMENT UNITS

•REPUBLIC ACT 6975 “OTHERWISE KNOWN AS AN ACT

REORGANIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF

INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERMENT”

•ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 267 “ DELEGATING TO THE

SECRETARY OF INTERIOR AND LOCAL

GOVERNMENT THE GENERAL

SUPERVISION OVER LGUs”

•REPUBLIC ACT 7160/ THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF 1991.

SEC. 45. NATIONAL GOVERNMENT

SUPERVISION OVER LOCAL

GOVERNMENT UNITS.



NATIONAL SUPERVISION OVER LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS

Does the President have supervision over local government units?

Yes. Under Article X Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution, thePresident of the Philippines exercises general supervision over thelocal government officials. Jurisprudence is replete with

pronouncements that this power of supervision pertains to anoverseer of an inferior body.

RA 7160 otherwise known as “The Local Government Code of1991” explicity provides for the supervisory powers of the National

Government over Local Government.



The provision reads:

Section 25. National Government Supervision over Local

Government Units. –

(a) Consistent with the basic policy on localautonomy, the President shall exercise generalsupervision over local government units to ensure that

their acts are within the scope of their prescribedpowers and functions.

The President shall exercise supervisory authority

directly over provinces, highly urbanized cities, andindependent component cities; through the provincewith respect to component cities and municipalities;and through the city and municipality with respect tobarangays.



Is it proper to conclude that the President’s supervisory

authority over local government units is restricted by the

provisions of RA 7160?

No. It is not proper to conclude that the President’s supervisory authority over local government units isrestricted by the provisions of RA 7160 thereby depriving

the former of any power to require conditions sine quanon, other than those specified by RA 7160.

Otherwise stated the President’s power of supervisionover local government officials must not be limited to an

inutile overseer, the President may validly provide for aninterim rules as an incident to supervision and his residualpowers, if only to address the exigencies of the situation.(DILG Opinion 91 Series of 2002)



In Ganzon v. Court of Appeals (200 SCRA 271,

286), the Supreme Court emphatically ruledthat “the grant of autonomy is intended to

break up the monopoly of the national

government over the affairs of localgovernments, xxx not xxx to end the relation of

partnership and interdependence between the

central government and local government units

xxx.” Paradoxically, local governments are still

subject to regulation, however limited, for

purpose of enhancing self-government.”



In the recent case of Pimentel v. Aguirre, 336 SCRA

201, the Court ratiocinated that:

“Under the Philippine concept of local autonomy, thenational government has not completely relinquished all itspowers over local governments, including autonomousregions. Only administrative powers local affairs are

delegated to political subdivisions. The purpose of thedelegation is to make governance more directly responsiveand effective at the local levels. The smaller political unitsare expected to propel social and economic growth anddevelopment. But to enable the country to develop as a

whole, the programs and policies effected locally must beintegrated and coordinated towards a common nationalgoal. Thus policy setting for the entire country still lies inthe President and Congress.”



Is such authority to act delegated to the Secretary of

the Interior and Local Government?

Yes. Administrative Order N. 267 states:

“Section 1. The authority to act upon the following matters ishereby delegated to the Secretary of the Interior and LocalGovernment:

3. Exercise of supervision directly over provinces, highlyurbanized cities and independent component cities, throughthe province with respect to component cities andmunicipalities and through the city and municipality withrespect to the barangays (Book 1, Title One, Article One,Section 25, LGC)

Clearly, the Secretary of the DILG exercises a delegatedsupervisory power over the LGUs.



Dilg Mandate (R.A. 6975)

– TO PROMOTE PEACE AND ORDER,

ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY AND FURTHER

STRENGTHEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT

CAPABILITY AIMED TOWARDS THEEFFECTIVENESS OF BASIC SERVICES TO

CITIZENRY.



SILG Memorandum (April 2008)

Subject: EXERCISE OF GENERAL SUPERVISION

OVER LGUs

• All LCEs are hereby reminded of their duty to

monitor and ensure that the acts of LGUs are

within the scope of their prescribed powers and

functions, consistent to the policy of the state topromote accountability and proper management

of public affairs.

•Likewise, all DILG Directors are hereby directed toclosely monitor and report any illegal acts or

irregularities committed by the LCEs.



• Iss uances of the DILG are in the nature of

execu t ive cons truc t ion and are ent i t led to

great weigh t and respect b y the Cou rt .

(Miguel vs . Cou rt o f Appeals, 230 SCRA 320)







Input

(Proposals throughPPA Design)

Process(Implementation)

OutputMonitor targets &Benchmark othersimilar activities

Outcome orResults (Impact)

The Project Cycle



Identifying Projects & Programs

3 QUESTIONS TO ASK:

– What’s in it for us? (LGU)

– What’s in it for beneficiaries? (Dev’t Change)

– What’s in it for the proponent? (Office Commitment)



CLUP

CDP

ELA

PROGRAM/PROJECT

PRIORITIES

LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS

CAPDEV REQUIREMENTS

GOALS AND

OBJECTIVES

(What the LGU

seeks to achieve in

3 years including

the capacity of the

LGU to deliver itscommitment?)

AIP – Yearly plan

implementation

•

Activities/Projects•Timetables

•Budget/Source

Direct RESULTS

OUTCOME

• SECTORAL CHANGES

• INSTITUTIONAL

CHANGES

STATE OF THE LOCAL

GOVERNMENT REPORT

1

23

Logical Framework



Challenge 1:

-How to develop a document i.e. project/activity design that captures

the requirement set by the mandate;

Proposed solution:

-Each department should commit themselves to the Agenda by

formulating a plan that identify their contribution to the attainment of

the objectives set in the ELA (social contract);

-Use common activity/project design – contain information that are

distinguishable or directly related to the project’s/activity’s

contribution to the mandate set in the ELA;

-Develop review mechanism in approving projects/activities – evaluated

as to its purpose, objectives and relevance to the desired output set inthe ELA.

(proposed session activity) Develop/improve/enhance the

project/program/activity design proposals



PPA Design Format

I. Project Identification

II. Rationale

III. Objectives/Expected Outputs

IV. Schedule of ImplementationV. Budgetary Requirements



I. Project Identification

• Project Title:

• Project Type: (infra, specific services, capdev, etc.)

• Project Proponent:

• Project Scope/Area:

• No. of Beneficiaries(specific):

• Project Duration:

•Budget Allocation:

• Source of Fund:

• Implementing Office:



II. Rationale

• 1st paragraph should tell about the project and

what it seeks to achieve.

• 2nd paragraph should provide project details

(the quantified needs to be addressed)

• 3rd paragraph should provide the project

components describing the strategies for

implementation.

• 4th paragraph should determine the

implementing office and its capacity to

implement.



III. Objectives

• Identify the targets in quantifiable terms that is

bounded by the project duration.

• Targets should be within the scope of the

project and its budget.

• There are PPA with moving targets and these

should be taken in consideration.

• These objectives are commitments made by

the implementing office that at the end of the

project duration the targets are achieved.



IV. Schedule of Implementation

• Specify the activities in the implementation

process and its corresponding expected outputs.

• Define the project duration, in days, weeks or

months.

• Present it in a table as prescribed below:

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1

2

3

4

Project DurationExpected OutputActivities

*In this case, project duration is set in months



III. Budgetary Requirements

• Consider the manpower, operating expenses

and capital expenditures of the program andcategorized it by class; namely Personnel

Services (PS), Maintaining & Other Operating

Expenditures (MOOE), and Capital Outlay (CO).• Specify funding source for each budgetary

needs.

• Present the budgetary needs in table formreflecting the whole picture of the program.



PPA Expenditures Funding

Source

Implementation Schedule Total

1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter

I. Personnel Services (PS)

Wages, overtime, etc.

I. MOOE

Materials & Supplies

Gasoline

I. Capital Outlay (CO)

Harvester

Tools

TOTAL

SampleTitle: Support to Agricultural Services

Rationale:

Based on the agricultural data in sectoral studies… Objectives:

MFO: to provide agricultural services to ….

PI: number of farmer beneficiaries

percentage increase in harvest/production

Implementing Office: City Agricultural Office



EXPENDITURE CATEGORY: OPERATING EXPENSES

“the appropriation spent for running a program or an activity.

It can be day-to-day expense such as administration, or

research & development.”

– Personnel Services (PS)

“Salaries, wages, social security contributions, overtime pay, etc.”

–

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE)“traveling expenses, supplies and materials, water, illumination and

power services, etc.”

– Interest payments

“represent the cost of borrowed funds which form part and parcel ofthe cost of the items financed by the loan.”

– Allotment to different departments

– Subsidies to economic enterprise



EXPENDITURE CATEGORY: CAPITAL OUTLAY “ the appropriation spent for the purchase of goods and services,

the benefits of which extend beyond the fiscal year and which

add to the assets of government.” – Infrastructure outlay

“Construction of various public works such as road, water supply,

irrigation, and other capital investments, the benefits of which extend to

the general public.”

– Equity contributions to government projects

“local government investments in the authorized capital stock of

government projects”

– Capital transfers to different departments

“pertains to the portion of the local government fund which accrue to the

different departments allocations”

– Other capital outlays

“Land acquisition, land improvement outlays, buildings and structures

outlays, acquisition of vehicles, equipment, furniture, fixtures, etc.”



Policies regarding current operating

expenditures are summarized as follows:

• Limit the growth of current operatingexpenditures with provisions for inflationadjustments;

•

Encourage cost reduction measures in operation,particularly overhead expense items;

• Provide adequate maintenance funds forinfrastructure facilities; and

• Control the growth of spending for personalservices within the level that can be sustained byavailable resources.

Ch ll 2



Challenge 2:

Tools to record and capture results of projects and activities

Proposed Solution:

-Establish a database system for of all projects that easily track results

and indicators of projects/activities implementation and easy

disaggregation of data; (The tool can be in matrix form using excel)

-Formulate project/activity monitoring report format.

Challenge 3:

How to connect results of projects/Activities to the LGU agenda,

National development direction, national commitments, LGPMs, Full

disclosure, etc.

Proposed solution:

-Establish a common monitoring tool;

-Develop a team to interpret data – for SLGR, LGPMS, MDG etc.



List of Participants who attended the

Resource Mobilization Orientation and Workshop

1. Louella L. Dacanay

2. Melvina Domingo

3. Ricky S. Bersamen

4. Arlene M. Algabre

5. Fatima C. Taliban

6. Jovita M. Lapayag

7. Alex C. Roldan

8. Irene D. Emphasis9. Kim G. Pedro

10. Kim Lester V. Chan

11. Maria Riza Ocampo

12. PJ Gulayan

13. Salee C. Amper

14. Joey Dulay

15. Alan A. Nacario

16. Joseph Jay O. Binasbas

17. Sharon Gay S. Ranain

18. Arlyn Joy B. Añora

19. Jovito M. Glodo

20. Edena L. Jumalon21. Queenie Marie Batilong

22. Hope V. Lopez

23. Divine Hofilenia

24. Vanessa Jane Albelda



List of Participants who attended the

Resource Mobilization Orientation and Workshop

25. Godofredo V. Berdon

26. Hanna T. Gadia

27. Griezel B. Del Rosario

28. Benjo-Marie E. Batican

29. Christopher B. Quitan

30. Judennis R. Regidor

31. Florabelle Sagot

32. Victor E. R. Calonia33. Jean A. Limas

34. Elvira P. Landiga

35. Jan Mari cafe

36. Ken Harvey C. Famor

37. Ricardo A. Naungayan

38. Cherryl N. Calonia

39. Cher Bastida

40. Juliet dela Gente

41. Danilo M. Hernandez

42. Karen Ann R. Maquilan

43. Cielito N. Miano44. Joseph Raymund A. Sumabal

45. Ed Lloyd Verallo



Documents

Resource Mobilization Orientation & Workshop