Residual Vectors

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    1/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-1

    Residual Vector Methods

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    2/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-2

    Section 11

    Residual Vector Methods

    CONCEPT OF MODAL APPROACH.. 11 - 3

    HOW DO I COMPENSATE FOR THE MISSING MODAL CONTENTS.. 11 - 5

    RESIDUAL VECTOR 11 - 6

    USER INTERFACE FOR RESIDUAL VECTOR.. 11 - 8

    EXAMPLE...11 - 10

    INPUT FILE FOR USING MODAL METHOD WITH

    RESIDUAL VECTOR 11 - 11

    RESULTS COMPARISON11 - 12

    GENERAL RECOMMENDATION11 - 14

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    3/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-3

    q Assume response can be represented as a linearcombination of calculated modes

    { U } = [ ] { }

    q Number of possible modes = number of degrees of

    freedom with mass on them

    q Same results as direct if all modes are retainedNot practical

    Defeats purpose of modal approach

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    4/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-4

    q { U } = [ ] { } = [ ]r { }r + [ ]n { }n

    where [ ]r = modes that are retained

    [ ]n = modes not retained

    q [ ]r is usually a small subset of [ ]

    q Quality of modal solution depends on how well a linearcombination of [ ]r can represent the actual solution dueto the applied loads.

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    5/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-5

    q Two methods are available to compensate for the missing

    modal contents

    Residual Vector (Recommended method)

    Mode Acceleration (See Appendix F)

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    6/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-6

    q Augment modes with static vectors obtained from staticloading

    q The response of the neglected modes tends to be static ifthese frequencies are high as compared to the excitationfrequency

    As (/n)

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    7/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-7

    q Supports superelement analysis

    q Two eigenvalue tables printed

    Original eigenvalue table

    Second eigenvalue table with the additional eigenvalues appended

    at the endone for each additional residual vector.

    q Re-orthogonalization is performed to ensure that linearlydependent vectors are removed

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    8/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-8

    q Three available options:

    Static shape obtained from spatial distribution of load (e.g.,DAREA, FORCE, PLOAD4, LOADSET/LSEQ etc.)

    Static shape obtained from inertia loads (PARAM, RESVINER, YES

    or PARAM, INRLM, -1 )

    Define USET,U6,GID,C or USET1,U6,C,GID1,GID2,

    Each degree of freedom defined on the USETi, U6 entry generates a

    static shape with a unit load applied in that direction

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    9/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-9

    q Activated with PARAM,RESVEC,YES

    q PARAM, RESVINER, YES or PARAM, INRLM, -1 augmentsadditional static shapes due to inertia loads.

    q SUPORT entry required for free-free structure

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    10/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-10

    q Using the same plate model, apply a single-cycle sine loadin the y-direction at grid point 11 at 250 hz. Monitor theresponse at grid point 11 using the following methods andcompare the results.

    1. Modal method, retaining 4 modes and using a modal damping of3%

    2. Repeat step 2 and include residual vector

    3. Direct method with G=.06

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    11/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-11

    $

    BEGIN BULK

    PARAM, COUPMASS, 1

    PARAM, WTMASS, 0.00259

    param,post,0

    param,resvec,yes

    $$ PLATE MODEL DESCRIBED IN NORMAL MODES EXAMPLE PROBLEM

    $

    INCLUDE 'plate.bdf'

    $

    $ EIGENVALUE EXTRACTION PARAMETERS

    $

    EIGRL, 100, , ,4

    $

    $ SPECIFY MODAL DAMPING

    $

    TABDMP1, 100, CRIT,

    +, 0., .03, 10., .03, ENDT

    $

    $ APPLY POINT LOAD (250 HZ)

    $

    TLOAD2, 500, 600,, 0, 0.0, 4.E-3, 250., -90.

    $

    DAREA, 600, 11, 2, 1.

    $

    TSTEP, 100, 100, 4.0E-4, 1

    $

    ENDDATA

    $

    $ resvec2.dat

    $

    SOL 112

    CEND

    TITLE = TRANSIENT RESPONSE WITH POINT LOAD IN THE Y-DIRECTION

    SUBTITLE = MODAL APPROACH - REQUESTING 4 MODES - plus RESIDUAL VECTORECHO = UNSORTED

    SPC = 1

    SET 111 = 11, 33, 55

    DISPLACEMENT(SORT2) = 111

    SDAMPING = 100

    SUBCASE 1

    METHOD = 100

    DLOAD = 500

    TSTEP = 100

    $

    OUTPUT (XYPLOT)

    XGRID=YES

    YGRID=YES

    XTITLE= TIME (SEC)

    YTITLE= DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE AT LOADED CORNER

    XYPLOT DISP RESPONSE / 11 (T2)

    YTITLE= DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE AT TIP CENTER

    XYPLOT DISP RESPONSE / 33 (T2)

    YTITLE= DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE AT OPPOSITE CORNER

    XYPLOT DISP RESPONSE / 55 (T2)

    $

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    12/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-12

    Direct Method

    Modal Method with ResidualVector

    Modal Method withoutResidual Vector

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    13/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-13

    q The first 4 modes are out-of-plane bending and torsiontype modes

    q Linear combination of these 4 modes will not be able tocapture motion due to an in-plane type loading

    q Modal method with first 4 modes without residual vectorgives unacceptable solution

    q Modal method with first 4 modes with residual vectorcompares favorably to direct solution.

    q Note that modal damping is used in the modal solutionand structural damping is used in the direct solutionwhich accounts for some of the slight differences in theresults

  • 8/3/2019 Residual Vectors

    14/14

    NAS102 November 2001, Page 11-14

    q Always include residual vector in a modal response

    analysis (param,resvec,yes)

    q Include the residual vector due to inertia load(param,resviner,yes) for non free-free structure

    q Use residual vector as an augmentation tool--not as areplacement tool, as used in the example problemto the

    modal contents