Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Residential FiltrationNAFA Conference 2018
Dr. Iain Walker
Air pollutants in homesPM has biggest health impact – focus on particle filtration
Disability Adjusted Life Years: DALYs
Logue, J. M., Price, P. N., Sherman, M. H., & Singer, B. C. (2012). A Method to Estimate the Chronic Health Impact of Air Pollutants in U.S. Residences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(2), 216–222
Where do indoor particles come from?• Outdoors
– Combustion – ICE’s– Agriculture– Industry– Atmospheric chemistry, e.g., ozone reactions– Wildfires
• Indoors– Cooking– Cleaning – Candles– Smoking– Incense
What particles do we care about?• Primarily PM2.5
– Demonstrated health impact
• Maybe ultrafines (sub-micron)– Not well demonstrated health
impact
• Big stuff we can see– Heat exchanger/blower
fouling
Focus on MERV 11/12/13To remove PM2.5
Particles: PM2.5
…causes increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality;
…is associated with and likely causes respiratory illness.1
www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics#PM
PM2.5 BenchmarksStandard Annual mean
g /m324-h meang /m3
US Ambient Standard(2012) 12 35
WHO Guideline Values(2005) 10 25
Canadian Ambient Standard2015 10 28
Canadian Ambient Standard2020 8.8 27
Standards only set for outdoor “ambient” air - no indoor standardsIAQ standards focus on specifying filters NOT measured
Stephens, Brennan & HarrimanASHRAE Journal, September 2016
PM2.5 in the Residential Environment
Active Filtration
Filters in Residential Standards: ASHRAE 62.21. MERV 6 – to protect equipment2. 20% ventilation credit for better filtration:
• Need a minimum flow rate through the filter:
Average flow ratethrough filter
Filtration factor 62.2 ventilation rate
A better filter requires less airflow to get the 20% credit
EPA Indoor Air Plus
MERV 8 minimum for central forced air systemsRecommend MERV 13 for supply air
USGBC LEED for Homes
Good: MERV 8Better: MERV 10Best: MERV 13
American Lung Association
• Once upon a time: MERV 11, changed every three months
• Currently…?
State of the air 2018 – no mention of filters or filtration
California Air Resources Board• Regulation for outdoor air• Certifies Portable Air Cleaners• Evaluating near roadway exposure• Evaluating cooking exposure• Studies showing improved health (asthma) with better filters
California Building Standards
Currently refer to ASHRAE 62.2: MERV 6 minimum
From 2020:
• MERV 13 filters in forced air systems
• Two inch filter depth
2019
Recent Research• Focus on filters in central forced air systems
– Interaction with HVAC performance• Change in airflows, static pressures, duct leakage,
heating/cooling energy use• Energy impacts of upgrading filters• Different filtration approaches
– Indoor and outdoor sources• Performance over time
– Particle removal– Fouling rates
Do better filters kill residential systems?Proposals to improve filtration get the same HVAC contractor feedback:Extra flow resistance will1. Lower flow resulting in lower heating/cooling efficiency2. Increase static pressures and overload blowers3. Make systems too noisy4. Increase duct leaks
California MERV 16 swap-out• LBNL field study 10 homes monitored for a year for California Energy
Commission
• Swapped in MERV16 filter for MERV 5- 11
Included some 4 in. filters:
A smorgasbord of filters
.. Even more filtersDirty Filters Thin Filters
Deep filters
Filter static pressure changes and loading rates
• Fan power reduced by 100 W PSC , increased by 70 W ECM• 1 or 2 in. filter loading rate: 10 Pa/million kg• 4 in. filter loading rate: 5 Pa/million kg
1 million kg = 2.2 million lb = 29 million ft3 = 29,000 minutes @ 1000 cfm = 20 days @ 24/7
Note – typical residential blower max pressure difference is 125 Pa (0.5” H2O)
Figure 5: Fan flow and power changes from House 1. The vertical lines show when the filter was changed from MERV 8 to MERV 16. Cooling and heating modes can be seen for both filters.
Figure 6: Pressure across the filter for House 1.
Figure 7: Pressure across the fan for House 1.
Figure 8: Supply plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.
Figure 9: Return plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.
Figure 10: Supply side leakage for House 1.
Figure 11: Return side leakage for House 1.
0
25
50
75
100
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Plenum Pressures [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Supply Plenum Pressure, House 1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Plenum Pressures [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Return Plenum Pressure, House 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Supply Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Supply Leakage Flow, House 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Return Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Return Leakage Flow, House 1
0
100
200
300
400
0
200
400
600
800
0.511.522.5
Flow: MERV 8 CoolingFlow: MERV 8 Heating
Flow: MERV 16 CoolingFlow: MERV 16 Heating
Fan Power
Fan Power [watts]
Fan Flow [cfm]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Filters: MERV 8 | MERV 16
Fan Flow and Power, House 1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Pressure [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Filters: MERV 8 | MERV 16
Filter Pressure, House 1
0
50
100
150
200
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Pressure [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Fan Pressure, House 1
Figure 8: Supply plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.
Figure 9: Return plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.
Figure 10: Supply side leakage for House 1.
Figure 11: Return side leakage for House 1.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Return Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Return Leakage Flow, House 1
0
25
50
75
100
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Plenum Pressures [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Supply Plenum Pressure, House 1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Plenum Pressures [Pa]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Return Plenum Pressure, House 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.511.522.5
MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating
MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating
Supply Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]
Cumulative Mass Flow [10
6
kg ]
Supply Leakage Flow, House 1
LBNL MERV 16 Field Study Summary• HUGE system to system and filter to filter variability • Everything < MERV 16 very small impact (
University of Texas Field Study
• ASHRAE RP 1299
• 17 homes and light commercial systems
• Short –term measurements
• Swapping low “MERV 2*” for MERV 11/12– Small changes in fan power and air flow– No measureable change in daily energy use
* Glass fiber “rock catcher”
But what about filter effectiveness changes?
MERV12MERV7
New
“Used”
MERV vs. Flow resistance - DEG
More variability between MERV 8 filters than between MERV 8 and other filters
MERV vs. flow resistance – IIT
Are high MERV filters system killers?No… but
… Some systems lots of air flow resistance already
… Advise against using 1” MERV 16 filters in residential systems
… bigger (2” or 4”) filter slots are a really good idea
… there is a huge range of filter flow resistance – even for the same MERV rating
Comparing filtration/ventilation optionsCalifornia Air Resources Board/LBNL Study• Field Study near freeway in
Sacramento, CA for California Air Resources Board
• Unoccupied – focus on outdoor particles• Compare eight enhanced filtration
systems to common, “reference” system– ASHRAE 62.2 Exhaust ventilation +
MERV 6 on central forced air system• Operate each system 5-7 days in
summer & fall/winter• Key metric is indoor-to-outdoor ratio
Test House: Impacted by I-80, Sacramento
~300 m N of
Test House
Particle Instrumentation
• Parallel systems switching indoor and outdoor
Particle Measurements
Ex M6 RTS M13 A+ESP Sup M16Cont
CFIS M16MRT
Ex+M13MRT
Ex+M13CONT
HEPA MRT Bypass
Indoor Particles – from cooking
Recirculation with M13/M16 filters
Outdoor Particle Filter Field Study Conclusions
• You need a good filter –MERV 13
• You need to operate continuously or at least a minimum runtime
• Central systems can have good performance if they do the above PLUS they get the indoor particles!
• HEPA bypass & ESP not very effective
• Room air cleaners are great for the room they are in
Residential Filtration Recommendations Consider the quality of your outdoor, “fresh” air
Highways and other major roadways, Industry, Agriculture
Supply ventilation (includes HRV/ERV) should be: Minimum MERV 13
Central forced air system required to address indoor sources Be aware of systems already at capacity for retrofitting At least MERV 13 preferably greater 2” (or 4” for MERV 16) filters are highly recommended Operate central systems continuously or minimum run time Consider stand-alone filtration in non-forced air homes or homes with
inefficient blower motors
What’s next in residential filtration?• Gas-phase filtration
– Targeting formaldehyde, acrolein
• What to do for non-forced air homes?
• Better forced air system design to accommodate better filters
• Get contractors to install wider filter slots
• Integrate with pollutant sensors & smart IAQ systems
AnyQuestions?
Swapping to MERV 16 problematic
Swapping to MERV 16 problematic
Residential FiltrationAir pollutants in homesWhere do indoor particles come from?What particles do we care about?Particles: PM2.5PM2.5 BenchmarksSlide Number 7PM2.5 in the Residential EnvironmentFilters in Residential Standards: ASHRAE 62.2Slide Number 10EPA Indoor Air PlusUSGBC LEED for HomesAmerican Lung AssociationCalifornia Air Resources BoardCalifornia Building Standards Recent ResearchDo better filters kill residential systems?California MERV 16 swap-outA smorgasbord of filters.. Even more filtersFilter static pressure changes and loading ratesSlide Number 22Slide Number 23LBNL MERV 16 Field Study SummaryUniversity of Texas Field Study But what about filter effectiveness changes?MERV vs. Flow resistance - DEGMERV vs. flow resistance – IITAre high MERV filters system killers?Comparing filtration/ventilation optionsTest House: Impacted by I-80, SacramentoParticle InstrumentationParticle MeasurementsSlide Number 34Indoor Particles – from cookingOutdoor Particle Filter Field Study ConclusionsResidential Filtration RecommendationsWhat’s next in residential filtration?Slide Number 39Swapping to MERV 16 problematicSwapping to MERV 16 problematic