41
Residential Filtration NAFA Conference 2018 Dr. Iain Walker

Residential Filtration - NAFA– Cleaning – Candles – Smoking – Incense. What particles do we care about? ... – Not well demonstrated health impact • Big stuff we can see

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Residential FiltrationNAFA Conference 2018

    Dr. Iain Walker

  • Air pollutants in homesPM has biggest health impact – focus on particle filtration

    Disability Adjusted Life Years: DALYs

    Logue, J. M., Price, P. N., Sherman, M. H., & Singer, B. C. (2012). A Method to Estimate the Chronic Health Impact of Air Pollutants in U.S. Residences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(2), 216–222

  • Where do indoor particles come from?• Outdoors

    – Combustion – ICE’s– Agriculture– Industry– Atmospheric chemistry, e.g., ozone reactions– Wildfires

    • Indoors– Cooking– Cleaning – Candles– Smoking– Incense

  • What particles do we care about?• Primarily PM2.5

    – Demonstrated health impact

    • Maybe ultrafines (sub-micron)– Not well demonstrated health

    impact

    • Big stuff we can see– Heat exchanger/blower

    fouling

    Focus on MERV 11/12/13To remove PM2.5

  • Particles: PM2.5

    …causes increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality;

    …is associated with and likely causes respiratory illness.1

    www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics#PM

  • PM2.5 BenchmarksStandard Annual mean

    g /m324-h meang /m3

    US Ambient Standard(2012) 12 35

    WHO Guideline Values(2005) 10 25

    Canadian Ambient Standard2015 10 28

    Canadian Ambient Standard2020 8.8 27

    Standards only set for outdoor “ambient” air - no indoor standardsIAQ standards focus on specifying filters NOT measured

  • Stephens, Brennan & HarrimanASHRAE Journal, September 2016

  • PM2.5 in the Residential Environment

    Active Filtration

  • Filters in Residential Standards: ASHRAE 62.21. MERV 6 – to protect equipment2. 20% ventilation credit for better filtration:

    • Need a minimum flow rate through the filter:

    Average flow ratethrough filter

    Filtration factor 62.2 ventilation rate

  • A better filter requires less airflow to get the 20% credit

  • EPA Indoor Air Plus

    MERV 8 minimum for central forced air systemsRecommend MERV 13 for supply air

  • USGBC LEED for Homes

    Good: MERV 8Better: MERV 10Best: MERV 13

  • American Lung Association

    • Once upon a time: MERV 11, changed every three months

    • Currently…?

    State of the air 2018 – no mention of filters or filtration

  • California Air Resources Board• Regulation for outdoor air• Certifies Portable Air Cleaners• Evaluating near roadway exposure• Evaluating cooking exposure• Studies showing improved health (asthma) with better filters

  • California Building Standards

    Currently refer to ASHRAE 62.2: MERV 6 minimum

    From 2020:

    • MERV 13 filters in forced air systems

    • Two inch filter depth

    2019

  • Recent Research• Focus on filters in central forced air systems

    – Interaction with HVAC performance• Change in airflows, static pressures, duct leakage,

    heating/cooling energy use• Energy impacts of upgrading filters• Different filtration approaches

    – Indoor and outdoor sources• Performance over time

    – Particle removal– Fouling rates

  • Do better filters kill residential systems?Proposals to improve filtration get the same HVAC contractor feedback:Extra flow resistance will1. Lower flow resulting in lower heating/cooling efficiency2. Increase static pressures and overload blowers3. Make systems too noisy4. Increase duct leaks

  • California MERV 16 swap-out• LBNL field study 10 homes monitored for a year for California Energy

    Commission

    • Swapped in MERV16 filter for MERV 5- 11

    Included some 4 in. filters:

  • A smorgasbord of filters

  • .. Even more filtersDirty Filters Thin Filters

    Deep filters

  • Filter static pressure changes and loading rates

    • Fan power reduced by 100 W PSC , increased by 70 W ECM• 1 or 2 in. filter loading rate: 10 Pa/million kg• 4 in. filter loading rate: 5 Pa/million kg

    1 million kg = 2.2 million lb = 29 million ft3 = 29,000 minutes @ 1000 cfm = 20 days @ 24/7

    Note – typical residential blower max pressure difference is 125 Pa (0.5” H2O)

  • Figure 5: Fan flow and power changes from House 1. The vertical lines show when the filter was changed from MERV 8 to MERV 16. Cooling and heating modes can be seen for both filters.

    Figure 6: Pressure across the filter for House 1.

    Figure 7: Pressure across the fan for House 1.

    Figure 8: Supply plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.

    Figure 9: Return plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.

    Figure 10: Supply side leakage for House 1.

    Figure 11: Return side leakage for House 1.

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Plenum Pressures [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Supply Plenum Pressure, House 1

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Plenum Pressures [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Return Plenum Pressure, House 1

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Supply Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Supply Leakage Flow, House 1

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Return Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Return Leakage Flow, House 1

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    0.511.522.5

    Flow: MERV 8 CoolingFlow: MERV 8 Heating

    Flow: MERV 16 CoolingFlow: MERV 16 Heating

    Fan Power

    Fan Power [watts]

    Fan Flow [cfm]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Filters: MERV 8 | MERV 16

    Fan Flow and Power, House 1

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Pressure [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Filters: MERV 8 | MERV 16

    Filter Pressure, House 1

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Pressure [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Fan Pressure, House 1

  • Figure 8: Supply plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.

    Figure 9: Return plenum pressure (relative to inside the house) for House 1.

    Figure 10: Supply side leakage for House 1.

    Figure 11: Return side leakage for House 1.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Return Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Return Leakage Flow, House 1

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Plenum Pressures [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Supply Plenum Pressure, House 1

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Plenum Pressures [Pa]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Return Plenum Pressure, House 1

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    0.511.522.5

    MERV 8 CoolingMERV 8 Heating

    MERV 16 CoolingMERV 16 Heating

    Supply Leakage Flow [% of Fan Flow]

    Cumulative Mass Flow [10

    6

    kg ]

    Supply Leakage Flow, House 1

  • LBNL MERV 16 Field Study Summary• HUGE system to system and filter to filter variability • Everything < MERV 16 very small impact (

  • University of Texas Field Study

    • ASHRAE RP 1299

    • 17 homes and light commercial systems

    • Short –term measurements

    • Swapping low “MERV 2*” for MERV 11/12– Small changes in fan power and air flow– No measureable change in daily energy use

    * Glass fiber “rock catcher”

  • But what about filter effectiveness changes?

    MERV12MERV7

    New

    “Used”

  • MERV vs. Flow resistance - DEG

    More variability between MERV 8 filters than between MERV 8 and other filters

  • MERV vs. flow resistance – IIT

  • Are high MERV filters system killers?No… but

    … Some systems lots of air flow resistance already

    … Advise against using 1” MERV 16 filters in residential systems

    … bigger (2” or 4”) filter slots are a really good idea

    … there is a huge range of filter flow resistance – even for the same MERV rating

  • Comparing filtration/ventilation optionsCalifornia Air Resources Board/LBNL Study• Field Study near freeway in

    Sacramento, CA for California Air Resources Board

    • Unoccupied – focus on outdoor particles• Compare eight enhanced filtration

    systems to common, “reference” system– ASHRAE 62.2 Exhaust ventilation +

    MERV 6 on central forced air system• Operate each system 5-7 days in

    summer & fall/winter• Key metric is indoor-to-outdoor ratio

  • Test House: Impacted by I-80, Sacramento

    ~300 m N of

    Test House

  • Particle Instrumentation

    • Parallel systems switching indoor and outdoor

  • Particle Measurements

  • Ex M6 RTS M13 A+ESP Sup M16Cont

    CFIS M16MRT

    Ex+M13MRT

    Ex+M13CONT

    HEPA MRT Bypass

  • Indoor Particles – from cooking

    Recirculation with M13/M16 filters

  • Outdoor Particle Filter Field Study Conclusions

    • You need a good filter –MERV 13

    • You need to operate continuously or at least a minimum runtime

    • Central systems can have good performance if they do the above PLUS they get the indoor particles!

    • HEPA bypass & ESP not very effective

    • Room air cleaners are great for the room they are in

  • Residential Filtration Recommendations Consider the quality of your outdoor, “fresh” air

    Highways and other major roadways, Industry, Agriculture

    Supply ventilation (includes HRV/ERV) should be: Minimum MERV 13

    Central forced air system required to address indoor sources Be aware of systems already at capacity for retrofitting At least MERV 13 preferably greater 2” (or 4” for MERV 16) filters are highly recommended Operate central systems continuously or minimum run time Consider stand-alone filtration in non-forced air homes or homes with

    inefficient blower motors

  • What’s next in residential filtration?• Gas-phase filtration

    – Targeting formaldehyde, acrolein

    • What to do for non-forced air homes?

    • Better forced air system design to accommodate better filters

    • Get contractors to install wider filter slots

    • Integrate with pollutant sensors & smart IAQ systems

  • AnyQuestions?

  • Swapping to MERV 16 problematic

  • Swapping to MERV 16 problematic

    Residential FiltrationAir pollutants in homesWhere do indoor particles come from?What particles do we care about?Particles: PM2.5PM2.5 BenchmarksSlide Number 7PM2.5 in the Residential EnvironmentFilters in Residential Standards: ASHRAE 62.2Slide Number 10EPA Indoor Air PlusUSGBC LEED for HomesAmerican Lung AssociationCalifornia Air Resources BoardCalifornia Building Standards Recent ResearchDo better filters kill residential systems?California MERV 16 swap-outA smorgasbord of filters.. Even more filtersFilter static pressure changes and loading ratesSlide Number 22Slide Number 23LBNL MERV 16 Field Study SummaryUniversity of Texas Field Study But what about filter effectiveness changes?MERV vs. Flow resistance - DEGMERV vs. flow resistance – IITAre high MERV filters system killers?Comparing filtration/ventilation optionsTest House: Impacted by I-80, SacramentoParticle InstrumentationParticle MeasurementsSlide Number 34Indoor Particles – from cookingOutdoor Particle Filter Field Study ConclusionsResidential Filtration RecommendationsWhat’s next in residential filtration?Slide Number 39Swapping to MERV 16 problematicSwapping to MERV 16 problematic