Upload
bruce-patel
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Bethlehem Moravian College. Research Seminar Fourth Year Research Candidates Topic: Data Collection Tools October 17, 2014. Dr. Abrilene Johnston-Scott Research Coordinator. Overview of Session. Interviews Observations Focus group discussions Document reviews - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Research Seminar
Fourth Year Research Candidates
Topic: Data Collection Tools
October 17, 2014
Bethlehem Moravian College
Dr. Abrilene Johnston-ScottResearch Coordinator
Overview of Session
– Interviews– Observations– Focus group discussions– Document reviews– Questionnaires-Likert Scale
Interviews
Interviews
• Interviews allow researchers to:– Explore participants’ perspectives in their own
terms– Inquire about the meaning people attach to
certain events• Interviews can be:
– Informal – conversational – Structured - fixed-response– Semi-structured
Types of Interview Questions
• Six types of interview questions:
1) Background/demographic questions2) Knowledge questions3) Experience/behavior questions4) Opinion/values questions5) Feelings questions6) Sensory questions
Types of Interviews
Informal-conversation Questions emerge from the immediate
context Semi-structured
Topics selected in advance Researcher determines sequence and
wording during interview. Standardized open-ended
Exact wording and sequence of questions predetermined.
Interviews have component parts
• Main questions identified in advance (6-10). • Follow-up questions (for example, asking for
more detail or nuance in individual responses.• Probes – techniques used to keep a discussion
going. • Questions can be skipped or order varied
depending on the flow of conversation. • Use opened ended questions.
Observation
• Purpose of observation– Describe the context– See what is spoken about first hand– Confirm reports of respondents
• Develop an observation checklist• Observation as:
– as outsider - unobtrusive– participant observation
• Generates field notes (narratives: on students behaviour or interest)
Observation Example
• Who you will observe: youth attending the program
• What you will observe: – Age, gender– Length of time student stays in the program– Involvement in activities: which activities
• Level of involvement – Interactions with other youth; with staff
• When you will observe: all hours the program is open for one week each month during 2014
Recording your observation
It is not good enough to just observe, you need to record your observations. You might use:
– Recording sheet– Checklist– Field note– Picture– Combination of the above
Sample Observation GuidesGuide for structured observations Guide for unstructured observations
Focus Group
Focus Group
Are used to assess people’s perceptions about programs, candidates, products or services.
Are used to generate recommendations for changing programs, products, campaign strategies, and services.
Are often used in conjunction with needs assessments or to generate ideas or explore themes that can be used in descriptive studies.
Are used to answer questions about how or why programs work.
Focus GroupMay be used in conjunction with other research
methods.Include six to eight participants who are selected
using purposive sampling methods Utilize a semi-structured interview guide with 6-8
questions.Require that a facilitator ask each of the questions
and solicit responses from members.Are used to generate a common response or a
consensus from group members.
A Focus Group . . .
Usually has approximately seven to ten people in them
With common characteristics relating to the discussion topic
Conducted by a trained interviewer (moderator, facilitator).
16
Moderator’s RoleStays relaxed and sets toneIntroduces and guides the discussionActively and carefully listensDoes NOT participate, or share views, or engage in the discussionDoes NOT editorialize commentsPromotes everyone’s participationIs non-judgmental and is respectful
17
Notetaker’s RoleTests and places the audio recording equipment Note: it helps to talk to participants beforehand to gauge and quiet the speakers
Comes prepared with pens and paperSits in the room during the entire discussion
where they can see & hear the participants Note: do not sit by the facilitatorSketches participant seating arrangement Note: use identifiers other than names
18
Document Review
Document review
• Obtain access to key documents and records at the outset
• Documents can help to establish what needs to be pursued through other methods (e.g., direct observation, interviews)
• Consider whether the documents are public – ethical issues
• Examples: school reports, attendance registers, standardised test scores
• Triangulation –divergent sources of information– Methods (interviews, observations, document
analysis etc)– Sources (different teachers, or teachers with
other school staff)
• Member check– ask participants to confirm transcripts/analyses
Triangulation
Questionnaires-Likert Scale
Dr. Rensis Likert
(1903 - 1981)
“ A technique for the measurement of Attitudes”
What is the Likert scale?• It is a psychometric scale commonly involved in research
that employs questionnaires.• It is the most widely used approach to scaling responses in
survey research. • Likert scales are a non-comparative scaling technique and
are one-dimensional in nature.• When responding to a Likert questionnaire item respondents
specify their level of agreement or disagreement on a symmetric agree-disagree scale for a series of statements.
• Thus, the range captures the intensity of their feelings for a given item, while the results of analysis of multiple items reveals a pattern that has scaled properties of the kind Likert identities
Five – point Likert item
Likert Scale Difference
Likert item
1. Strongly disagree2. Disagree3. Neither agree nor disagree4. Agree5. Strongly agree
The format of a typical five-level Likert item
Example:Codes: 1-strongly disagree, 2- disagree, 3- neutral, 4-agree, 5- strongly agree
S/N Affirmative perception statements Codes
(i) OPAC / Web OPAC was Easier to use than I expected 1 2 3 4 5
(ii) It was Fun to use 1 2 3 4 5
(iii) It was Easy to use 1 2 3 4 5
(iv) It helped me in finding the documents faster 1 2 3 4 5
(v) It is Very difficult to use 1 2 3 4 5
(vi) It is Very confusing to use 1 2 3 4 5
(vii) I found more items than expected 1 2 3 4 5
(viii) I am comfortable with simple search 1 2 3 4 5
(ix) I am comfortable complex/Advance search 1 2 3 4 5
(x) I am comfortable quick search 1 2 3 4 5
(xi) I am comfortable when using OPAC/Web OPAC 1 2 3 4 5
Q.18.Please measure the following affirmative perceptions about your library OPAC and Web OPAC use .
Thank You