7
Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona AZ1732 January 2017 Mark Kroggel and Chieri Kubota Controlled Environment Agriculture Center, The University of Arizona Summary Grafting cucurbits onto rootstocks resistant to diseases and abiotic stresses can be a method to overcome limited availability of effective pre-plant fumigants or land to rotate and to allow earlier planting. Commonly used rootstocks for cucurbits have resistance to Fusarium (race 1&2) as well as cold tolerance, among other favorable traits like increased vigor of the scion. Grafting of cucurbits was developed in Asia primarily to allow production without rotation, because arable land is so limited. In the US, crop rotation schedules for seedless watermelon can be 3 years or longer reducing the amount of watermelon a grower can produce in a season. We have been growing grafted and non-grafted seedless watermelon on the same field/plot for 4 years, with no fumigation or off-season rotation of other crops. During the last 2 years, we planted early (March 1) to determine if grafting could overcome low night temperatures in addition to disease pressures. Treatments included grafted and non-grafted plants, covering with frost protection and non-covered. The results of the last 2 years indicate that grafted plants yielded nearly twice as much as non-grafted plants, suggesting that grafting can be a promising technology for Arizona watermelon producers. Introduction Watermelon is a minor crop in Arizona vegetable production. However, in 2012, a total of 4,876 acres were harvested, being ranked as 8 th in the U.S. (USDA, 2014). Arizona watermelon production is mainly concentrated in Maricopa, La Paz and Yuma counties. Typical production of melons in Arizona involves two crops a year with appropriate land rotation programs. Watermelon is known to be sensitive to possible yield decline due to intensive cultivation and rotation is essential to avoid soil-borne disease such as fusarium. Traditionally watermelon was cultivated with a relatively long rotation program such as 9 or 10 years; however, rotation becomes more challenging due to the land availability. For example, currently 2 to 3 years of rotation (with garbanzo beans or wheat) is typical in Maricopa and little or no rotation is practiced in Yuma. Anecdotally watermelon yield in Arizona is relatively small (20-25 ton/acre), presumably due to various factors including limited rotation programs. In Asian and European countries, where arable land is limited and therefore more intensive land use is performed, grafting has been used effectively to sustain watermelon production without relying on rotation programs as well as to increase the yield (Davis et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2010). Vegetable grafting was introduced to Arizona initially in the European based greenhouse industry in the late 1990s but also to field production in the early 2000s. While it became a standard technology of increasing yield in greenhouse tomato (Kubota et al., 2008) in Arizona, evaluations for watermelon have not been performed yet. Because of the rather high costs of seedlings (50-70 cents per plant), large increases in yield or reduction of costs associated with reduced application of pesticides, reduced management

Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

  • Upload
    lyduong

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

ResearchReport

PotentialYieldIncreasebyGraftingforWatermelonProductioninArizonaAZ1732 January2017

MarkKroggelandChieriKubota

ControlledEnvironmentAgricultureCenter,TheUniversityofArizona

SummaryGraftingcucurbitsontorootstocksresistanttodiseasesandabioticstressescanbeamethodtoovercomelimitedavailabilityofeffectivepre-plantfumigantsorlandtorotateandtoallowearlierplanting.CommonlyusedrootstocksforcucurbitshaveresistancetoFusarium(race1&2)aswellascoldtolerance,amongotherfavorabletraitslikeincreasedvigorofthescion.GraftingofcucurbitswasdevelopedinAsiaprimarilytoallowproductionwithoutrotation,becausearablelandissolimited.IntheUS,croprotationschedulesforseedlesswatermeloncanbe3yearsorlongerreducingtheamountofwatermelonagrowercanproduceinaseason.Wehavebeengrowinggraftedandnon-graftedseedlesswatermelononthesamefield/plotfor4years,withnofumigationoroff-seasonrotationofothercrops.Duringthelast2years,weplantedearly(March1)todetermineifgraftingcouldovercomelownighttemperaturesinadditiontodiseasepressures.Treatmentsincludedgraftedandnon-graftedplants,coveringwithfrostprotectionandnon-covered.Theresultsofthelast2yearsindicatethatgraftedplantsyieldednearlytwiceasmuchasnon-graftedplants,suggestingthatgraftingcanbeapromisingtechnologyforArizonawatermelonproducers.

Introduction

WatermelonisaminorcropinArizonavegetableproduction.However,in2012,atotalof4,876acreswereharvested,beingrankedas8thintheU.S.(USDA,2014).ArizonawatermelonproductionismainlyconcentratedinMaricopa,LaPazandYumacounties.TypicalproductionofmelonsinArizonainvolvestwocropsayearwithappropriatelandrotationprograms.Watermelonisknowntobesensitivetopossibleyielddeclineduetointensivecultivationandrotationisessentialtoavoidsoil-bornediseasesuchasfusarium.Traditionallywatermelonwascultivatedwitharelativelylongrotationprogramsuchas9or10years;however,rotationbecomesmorechallengingduetothelandavailability.Forexample,currently2to3yearsofrotation(withgarbanzobeansorwheat)istypicalinMaricopaandlittleornorotationispracticedinYuma.AnecdotallywatermelonyieldinArizonaisrelativelysmall(20-25ton/acre),presumablyduetovariousfactorsincludinglimitedrotationprograms.

InAsianandEuropeancountries,wherearablelandislimitedandthereforemoreintensivelanduseisperformed,graftinghasbeenusedeffectivelytosustainwatermelonproductionwithoutrelyingonrotationprogramsaswellastoincreasetheyield(Davisetal.,2008;Leeetal.,2010).VegetablegraftingwasintroducedtoArizonainitiallyintheEuropeanbasedgreenhouseindustryinthelate1990sbutalsotofieldproductionintheearly2000s.Whileitbecameastandardtechnologyofincreasingyieldingreenhousetomato(Kubotaetal.,2008)inArizona,evaluationsforwatermelonhavenotbeenperformedyet.Becauseoftheratherhighcostsofseedlings(50-70centsperplant),largeincreasesinyieldorreductionofcostsassociatedwithreducedapplicationofpesticides,reducedmanagement

Page 2: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

practicesorreducedfrequencyoflandrotationneedtobeconsideredtogetherasbenefitsofgraftedwatermelonproduction.

InspringproductionofwatermeloninArizona,seedlingswith2-3leavesaretransplantedbetweenJanuaryandMarch.Duringthistime,somegrowersapplyfloatingrowcoversovernewlytransplantedwatermelonseedlingstoprotectthemfromthecoldnights.Whilethispracticeallowsgrowerstostarttheseedlingsearlyandtherebytargetingtheearlypremiummarket,theadditionalcostaswellastheneedoftemperaturemanagementareconsideredproblematic.Whilewatermelonissensitivetochilling,rootstocks(squashorbottlegourd)widelyusedforgraftingwatermelonareknowntobecoldtolerant(SpalholtzandKubota,2016).Therefore,wehypothesizedthatgraftingmayeliminatetheneedofrowcoverduringearlyspringplantingseasonandconductedasmallscaletrialinanexperimentalfieldattheCampusAgricultureCenter,theUniversityofArizona(Tucson,AZ).Inthisreportwesummarizethecomparisonofgraftedandnon-graftedwatermelonplantsgrownwithandwithoutcover,repeatedovertwoyearsin2015and2016.

ProcedureGraftedandnon-graftedplantswereproducedforthetrials.Thescionwas‘Tri-X313’seedless

watermelon(SyngentaSeeds,Boise,Idaho)androotstockwas‘Strongtosa’interspecifichybridsquash(SyngentaSeeds).Seedsofscionandrootstockwereplantedinto98cellplugtraysonmultipledatesduringfirstweekofFebruaryandgraftedonFebruary16usingthesinglecotyledonmethod.Plantswerehealedfor7daysinhealingchambers,thenacclimatedandgrowningreenhouseuntilMarch1.Non-grafted‘Tri-X313’wasseededonFebruary10andgrowninthesamegreenhouse.PlantswereplantedinafieldatTheUniversityofArizonaCampusAgricultureCenterinsoilcharacterizedasGilafinesandyloamonraisedbedswithbed/rowson80inchcentersandplantsinrowon43inchspacingusingaLatinsquaredesign.Theplantingdensityis1,823plantsperacre.Treatmentswere1)grafted-non-covered,2)grafted-covered,3)non-grafted-non-covered,4)non-grafted-covered.Therewere4replicationsof7plantspertreatment.Pollinizerplants(SP-6,SyngentaSeeds)wereplantedbetweeneverythirdplantintherow.Coveredtreatmentswerecoveredonthedayofplantingwitha0.9ozyd-2spunbondedpolypropylenefabric(AG-30;J&MIndustries,Ponchatoula,LA)followingthepracticeofYumagrowers(K.Nolte,personalcommunication)andventedasnecessarytomoderatetemperatureandcompletelyremovedwhenriskoffrostwaslow(3/21/15and3/16/16).

Plantswereirrigatedbyburieddriptape(Chapinmodel11704420;JainIrrigationSystemsLTD,Maharashtra,India.)basedonplantdemand.Starting3weeksafterplantingfertilizerwasappliedweeklythroughthedrip.Nitrogenwasappliedfor14weeksusingUAN-32toachieveacumulativetotalactualNrateof160lb/acre(180kgha-1)(2015)and110lb/acre(120kgha-1)(2016).Phosphoruswasappliedduringthefirst7weeksusingmono-potassiumphosphate(0-52-34)toachieveacumulativetotalactualPrateof30lb/acre(75kgha-1),andpotassiumwasappliedduringthelast7weeksusingpotassiumsulfate(0-0-50)toachieveacumulativetotalactualKrateof125lb/acre(140kgha-1).ToohighnitrogenmightmakegraftedplantstoovegetativesolimitingNisastandardpracticeinmanaginggraftedwatermelonplants.Therefore,in2016,plant’stissuenitrogenlevelwasmonitoredperiodicallytonotexceedtheupperlimitof1200ppmduringearlydevelopmentstagesand800ppmduringlatedevelopmentstageaccordingtotherecommendationbyBrust(2013).

Plantsweremeasuredforvinegrowth,initialflowering,transplantmortalityandyieldasnumberandweightsoffruit.Fruitqualitywasmeasuredbybrix.Fruitwasconsideredharvestablewhenthe3tendrilsadjacenttothefruithaddried,butbyrecommendation,thegraftedfruitwasharvested5

Page 3: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

daysafterthis(R.Hassell,personalcommunication).Fruitwasharvestedfrom5/25/15to7/3/15andfrom6/14/16to7/12/16.Therewasnosignificantinteractionbyyearandsothedatawerecombinedtoanalyzethemainfactorsofthefourtreatments.

Results/discussionCoveringaftertransplantingsignificantlyincreasedtheearlyvegetativeandreproductive

developmentofwatermelonplantsregardlessofplanttype(graftedvs.non-grafted).Italsolargelyreducedthelossofprimarilynon-graftedplantsduetotransplantfailure(Table1).However,thesedifferencesinearlyproductionstagedidnotaffectthefruityieldenoughtohaveastatisticallysignificantdifference(Table2).Inthesetrials,wereplacedthetransplantslostduringthefirsttwoweeksoffieldestablishment.Withoutreplacingseedlings,coveringmighthavesignificantlyaffectedtheyield.

Itissuggestedthatseedlesswatermelonseedbeplantedwhenthesoiltemperaturesreaches70F(Shrefleretal.,2015).Thesoiltemperatureintheupper4”didnotreach70Funtil5/25/15and5/11/16(datanotshown),suggestingsuboptimalsoiltemperaturesafterplantingformorethan9weeks.ThecoldtoleranceoftheStrongtosarootstockwouldhaveprovidedanadvantageoverthenon-graftedplantsduringthistime,allowingformorevegetativeplantdevelopment.

GraftedplantsaresensitivetoN,andtoomuchNcanresultinflowerabortion.In2016theapplicationofNwasreducedearlyinthegrowingseasonwiththeintendedeffecttoreducetheamountofearlyflowerabortioningraftedplants,whichitdidasthereweremorefemaleflowersperplantearlyinthecropin2016than2015(4.1±0.21in2016vs2.3±0.38in2015,p=0.001)asmeasuredon54-58daysafterplanting.TherewasnoeffectreducedNonnon-graftedplantsforfemaleflowers(1.35±0.24in2016vs1.32±0.28in2015,p=0.9469).

Nongraftedplantsproducedanaverageof25.8±3.4lbs.perplant,whichisequatedto23.5tonsperacre,asimilarlevelofyieldobservedinArizonawatermelonproduction(S.Martori,personalcommunication).Graftedplantsproduced55.5±6.9lbs.perplantor50.6tonsperacre,twiceasmuchyieldasnon-graftedplants.Thisisduetomorefruitandlargerfruitingraftedplantsthaninnon-graftedplants.Similarresultsofincreasedwatermelonfruitsizebygraftingontointerspecifichybridrootstock(CucurbitamaximaxCucurbitamoschata)havebeenreported(Sakataetal.,2007).

Fruitqualityissometimesreportedasaffectedbyrootstock.Atypicaldifferencebetweengraftedandnon-graftedplantswasthespeedofmaturationoffruit.Forthisreason,wepickedthefruitofgraftedplants5dayspastthefirstindicationofconventionalmaturation.Solublesolidcontentofthefullyripefruitwas10.6±0.11forgraftedplantsand10.7±0.07fornon-graftedplantswithnosignificantdifferencethetwotreatments.

Conclusion

Seedlesswatermelongraftedontoahybridsquashresultedintwicetheyieldofnon-graftedplants,withoutcausinganynegativeinfluenceinfruitquality.Thisyieldincreasewasaresultofmoreandlargerfruit,presumablyduetothemorevigorous,coldtolerantanddiseaseresistantrootsystemoftherootstock.Evenatawholesalepriceof$0.10perlbs.thisaverageyieldincreaseofmorethan25lbs.perplantmorethanpaysforthecostofthegraftedplant($0.50–0.70).Consideringthepossibleeliminationofcovering,fumigationandrepeatedcroppingthisvalueofgraftingisincreased.

Page 4: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

Acknowledgements

ThisprojectwasfundedbyUSDANIFASCRI(AwardNumber2011-51181-30963).AuthorswouldliketothankRichardHassellatClemsonUniversityforprovidingtechnicalconsultationinwatermelonproductionandSyngentaSeedsforprovidingwatermelonandrootstockseeds.WearegratefultoKurtNolte,theUniversityofArizona,YumaAgricultureCenterandSteveMartori,MartoriFarms,ArizonafortheirhelpfulconsultationanddiscussionindesigningtheexperimentsrelevanttoArizonamelonproduction.ReferencescitedBrust,D.2013.Usingnitrate-Npetiolesap-testingforbetternitrogenmanagementinvegetablecrops.

MarylandVegetables.Dec.17,2016.<https://extension.umd.edu/learn/using-nitrate-n-petiole-sap-testing-better-nitrogen-management-vegetable-crops>.

Davis,R.,P.Perkins-Veazie,Y.Sakata,S.López-Galarza,M.Vicente,S.Lee,Y.Huh,Z.Sun,A.Miguel,S.King,R.Cohen,andJ.Lee.2008.Cucurbitgrafting.Crit.Rev.PlantSci.27:50-74.

Kubota,C.,M.A.McClure,N.Kokalis-Burelle,M.G.Bausher,andE.N.Rosskopf.2008.Vegetablegrafting:History,use,andcurrenttechnologystatusinNorthAmerica.HortScience43:1664-1669.

Lee,J.-M.,C.Kubota,S.J.Tsao,Z.Bie,P.HoyosEchevarria,L.Morra,andM.Oda.2010.Currentstatusofvegetablegrafting:Diffusion,graftingtechniques,automation.ScientiaHort.127:93-105.

Sakata,Y.,Takayoshi,O.,andS.Mitsuhiro.2007.ThehistoryandpresentstateofthegraftingofcucurbitaceousvegetablesinJapan.ActaHortic.731:159-170.

Spalholtz,H.andC.Kubota.2016.Rootstockaffectedin-andpost-storageperformanceofgraftedwatermelonseedlingsatlowtemperature.HortTechnology(inpress).

USDA2014.CensusofAgriculture2012.UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,NationalAgriculturalStatisticsService.

Shrefler,J.,E.Rebek,J.Damicone,andM.Taylor.2015.Watermelonproduction.OklahomaCooperativeExtensionServiceHLA-6236.Dec.17,2016.< http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-1110/HLA-6236web2015.pdf>.

Page 5: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

Figure1.Acclimatedgraftedplants(a)andnon-graftedplants(b)ondayofplanting.

Page 6: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

Figure2.Watermelonatharvesttime(a)andnearingharvest(b).

Page 7: Research Report - University of Arizona · Research Report Potential Yield Increase by Grafting for Watermelon Production in Arizona ... , 2014). Arizona watermelon production is

Table1.Plantcharacteristicsmeasuredfor2015and2016combined.Numberofvinesmeasuredon55daysafterplanting(DAP).Numberoffemaleflowersmeasuredon54–58DAP.Percentofplantsthatwerereplacedduetomortalitywithin14DAP.Valuesaremean±SE.Treatment Numberofvines Numberoffemale

flowers%ofreplacedtransplants

Grafted 11.1±0.9*** 3.2±0.3*** 1.8±1.2***Non-grafted 4.7±0.3 1.3±0.2 24.1±4.7 Covered 9.5±1.1*** 2.7±0.3* 8.0±3.4*Non-covered 6.4±0.7 1.8±0.4 17.9±5.0*0.05,**0,01,***0.001nsNotsignificant

Table2.Yieldresponsesfor2015and2016combinedfortreatmentmaineffectsofgraftedandnon-graftedplants,coveredandnon-coveredplants.Fruitwasharvestedfrom5/25/15to7/3/15andfrom6/14/16to7/12/16.Plantingdensitywas1823plantsperacre.Valuesaremean±SE.

Treatment tons/acre lbs/plant Fruitsize(lbs) #fruit/plantGrafted 50.6±6.3*** 55.5±6.9*** 15.6±0.7* 3.4±0.3***Non-grafted 23.5±3.1 25.8±3.4 12.3±0.9 1.9±0.2 Covered 38.1±6.7ns 41.8±7.3ns 14.1±0.88ns 2.7±0.3nsNon-covered 36.0±5.3ns 39.5±5.8ns 13.9±1.10ns 2.6±0.3ns*0.05,**0,01,***0.001nsNotsignificantDataweretransformedusingSQRT