Upload
jennifer-lloyd
View
143
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Culture and Communication in a World of Globalization
Jennifer Lloyd
UIN: 01015633
COMM 200S
12/7/15
HONOR PLEDGEJennifer Lloyd
Culture and Communication in a World of Globalization
Culture defines many behaviors and shapes the way we communicate with others. Specifically, our
emotions and the way we encode and decode emotion is based on culture. In a world of substantial
growth of globalization it is important to understand the way different cultures express emotion in order
to maintain healthy, professional, and personal relationships with those people. While globalization has
been in existence since before World War I, it has increased 20 times since 1950. (Globalization 101,
2015) In addition, the increase in globalization provides the opportunity for us to interact with those
from other cultures. Therefore it is important to avoid making generalizations based on stereotypes.
Furthermore, cultures may express emotion differently but ultimately we all have the same emotions
and we are all individuals. This research will analyze emotion, emotion management, expression of
emotion and values, conflict styles, and how to prepare for working and communicating with other
cultures in order to enhance both professional and personal relationships with people from around the
globe.
Emotions are the way we express our perception of a situation. As stated by Christina Kotchemidova
(2010) in her paper “Emotion Cultures and Cognitive Construction of Reality,”
“emotions are part of the meaning-making process of the individual and are thus fluidly integrated into
cognitive constructions of reality.” (Kotchemidova, 2010, p. 213) She also states “every society develops
some emotional norms that outline the admissible range of emotional experience in concurrence with
definite situations.” (Kotchemidova, 2010, p. 208) In other words, society creates acceptable emotional
responses based on a variety of situations. Therefore, we create ways to cognitively control emotions in
order to meet cultural standards. (Kotchemidova, 2010, p. 208) For that reason, most strive to manage
emotion that society deems as acceptable because if one is unable to do so they may be perceived as
emotionally disturbed or an outcast. (Kotchemidova, 2010) Emotion management involves creating,
intensifying, suppressing or transforming emotions by controlling cognitive and somatic experience.
(Kotchemidova, 2010) Emotion management can be uncomfortable for some, especially those from
another culture. For example, in her research Kotchemidova (2010) spoke to participants that were
raised outside, but now living in, the United States. Participants spoke of Americans as being cheerful
and not wanting to participate in negative speaks. Therefore, the participants felt uncomfortable
complaining or discussing topics that were not positive. (Kotchemidova, 2010) While emotional
management is difficult when becoming immersed in other cultures it seems encoding and decoding
emotion of other cultures is difficult as well.
According to Young, Hugenberg, and Prokhovich (2012) in the article “Group-Level and Individual-Level
Influence on Emotion Expression Decoding, the researchers found that “perceivers are most accurate
when decoding the emotional expressions of members of their own social group.” (Young, Hugenberg,
Prokhovich, 2012, p. 51) Also, there is a difference in the way we interpret the intensity of emotion.
Using another example from Young et al. (2012) “American participants rate expressions as being more
intense than Japanese observers, but that Japanese participants rate the expressions as being more
indicative of actual internal experiences than American participants.” (Young, Hugenberg, Prokhovich,
2012, p. 53) And there are additional differences in the way we encode and decode emotions. Another
example is Western culture emphasize the mouth when encoding and decode by gazing evenly across
the face, whereas Eastern cultures encode with the eyes and decode by maintaining focus on the eyes.
(Young, Hugenberg, Prokhovich, 54) As evidenced by this information, emotions are encoded and
decoded differently culture to culture. But understanding specific cultural differences in the way we
express emotions will help us fully understand how to get along with those from other cultures.
Cultures express emotions differently. Such as, Americans being viewed as cheerful, nice, and friendly,
according to Korchevmidova’s findings. (Kotchemidova, 2010) Furthermore, there is research that
supports the assumption that Americans are more likely to express positive emotion while avoiding
negative emotion. For example, Americans tend to smile more often and use exclamations and
superlatives more frequently than Europeans. (Kotchemidova, 2010). An exaggeration of positive
emotion is common in America unlike other similar cultures. For instance, Americans use the word
“great” to describe many things, the Australian equivalent is “not bad at all.” (Kotchemidova, 2010)
Furthermore, according to the article “How We Think, Feel and Express Love: A Cross-Cultural
Comparison between American and East Asian Cultures,” “Americans reported openness,
expressiveness, and physical contact more often than Japanese in expressing intimacy.” (Kline, Horton,
Zhang, 2005, p. 7) Obviously there are differences in the way we express our emotion. While Americans
are seen as a culture of cheerfulness, that refuses to discuss topics that could ruin the mood, other
cultures have a more serious outlook. For instance, Christina Kotchemidova (2010) states “studies of
emotion management in the United States consistently describe individuals’ efforts to sustain and
cheerful state of mind , but comparable studies from Europe focus almost exclusively on self-restraint
from sexual and violent urges to transforming the emotions of anger, hate, and erotic love into respect
and kindness.” (Kotchemidova, 2010, p. 212) Furthermore, she states that Germans tend to focus on
reflection, self-awareness, and understanding life. (Kotchemidova, 2010) In other words, cultures have
different goals and values that they hold as important. Americans value happiness, Europeans value
respect, and Germans prefer thoughtful reflection. Understanding these differences is important to
cultivating relationships with those from other cultures. However it is not only important to understand
the differences in values and how we visualize the world around us, it’s equally important to understand
how we deal with conflict.
Recognizing the way cultures respond to conflict is important. Conflict is a part of both professional and
personal relationships. In the research report “Conflict Styles and High-Low Context Cultures: A Cross
Cultural Extension,” Stephen M. Croucher et al. (2012) define conflict as “an expressed struggle between
at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference
from the other party in achieving their goals.” (Croucher et al, 2012, p. 64) This research compared
conflict styles between two high-context nations (India and Thailand) with two low-context nations
(Ireland and the United States). The results showed “individuals from high-context cultures are more
likely to use indirect conflict strategies, such as non-confrontation strategies (avoiding and obliging)”.
(Croucher et al, 2012, p. 70) Furthermore, Americans and Irish, low-context cultures, used more
dominating conflict styles. Moreover, the results find high-context nations focus on solution-oriented
styles and compromise more than low-context nations however the results differed from previous
research. (Croucher et al, 2012) To explain these differences in findings the researchers point to a
couple aspects of the Indian and Thai nations including; rapid increase in economy and expansion in
competition in a global market place and potential change of individualism in nations. No matter what
the reason for the difference, it is clear that cultures respond to conflict differently. Therefore in order
to maintain relationships in a world of globalization it is important to determine differences and respond
appropriately. Another aspect of understanding other cultures is recognizing the cultural differences as
it relates to business.
With the increase in globalization it is important that professionals recognize how cultures operate in
the business sense. It is important not to stereotype a culture based on perceived notions. As discussed
in the article “Navigating the Cultural Minefield,” author Erin Meyer (2014) reports that stereotyping can
lead to “oversimplified and erroneous assumptions.” (Meyer, 2014, p.1) As an example she argues that
the Japanese are hierarchical, therefore the assumption is that the Japanese would always make top-
down decisions, which is not the case. (Meyer, 2014) In addition, she uses the example of French
subtlety in communication; one might expect the French to be indirect with their negative feedback.
(Meyer, 2014) These assumptions are not always accurate and could cause miscommunication or
conflict. Meyers (2014) goes on to report the importance of understanding a culture in order to grasp
the best way manage in cultures different from one’s own. Meyers (2014) provides a “Cultural Map”
that explains ways to properly manage in different cultures through; communication, evaluation,
persuasion, leadership, decision making, trust, disagreement, scheduling. (Meyer, 2014) Furthermore
she emphasizes the importance of not underestimating the challenge of change, applying multiple
cultural perspectives, being able to apply different approaches, and to make adjustments as necessary.
(Meyer, 2014) Comprehending cultural differences and being flexible both personally and
professionally is important to develop and maintain multi-cultural relationships.
While it’s clear that we all have the same emotions, cultural influence affects how these emotions are
expressed. It is important to learn to encode and decode emotion properly in order to promote positive
rapport. Learning to decipher information will improve the ability to communicate and appreciate
diverse cultures. Although it is important to learn how cultures express emotion and interact it’s also
imperative to stress that generalizations and stereotypes are not always accurate and should be
avoided. When dealing with other cultures in either a personal or professional manner it is best to do
some research on cultural similarities and dissimilarities and build a relationship with the understanding
of these. Furthermore, with the increase of globalizations some cultures are seeing a shift in their
identity; therefore although it is important to understand the culture it is also important to recognize
people from a culture as individuals as well. In conclusion, we can communicate and build successful
relationships with people from other cultures by avoiding generalizations and stereotypes and
interacting with them as individuals that possess varying needs and values.
References
Croucher, S., Bruno, A., Mcgrath, P., Adams, C., Mcgahan, C., Suits, A., & Huckins, A. (2012) Conflict
styles and high-low context cultures: A cross-cultural extension. Communication Research
Reports, 29, 64-73.
Globalization101. (2015). What is globalization? The Levin Institute – The State University of New York.
Retrieved from http://www.globalization101.org/what-is-globalization/
Kline, S., Horton, B., Zhang, S. (2005). How we think, feel and express love: A cross-cultural comparison
between American and East Asian cultures. Conference Papers-International Communication
Association. 1-28.
Kotchemidova, C. (2010). Emotion culture and cognitive constructions of reality. Communication
Quarterly, 58(2), 207-234.
Meyer, E. (2014) Navigating the cultural minefield. Harvard Business Review, Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2014/05/navigating-the-cultural-minefield
Young, S., Hugenberg, K., Prokhovich, A. (2012). Group-level and individual-level influence on emotion
expression decoding. Journal of Communications Research, 4(1/2), 51-69.