Research Group Text, Culture, and Identity

The Literature Project Text, Culture and Identity Keywords:

Literary Culture – Media – Constructions of Identity and Heritage – History of the Present – Topicality of the Past – Ideology – Effect/Affect – Cultural Theory

Description of research program Culture is ordinary and everywhere, yet at the same time it is highly complex, difficult to grasp, and endlessly variable. In this program, therefore, modern and contemporary culture are studied as a complex, dynamic network of signifying practices, in interaction with the discourses and ideologies that structure society at large. In our research, we explore the role of literary and other forms of production in the construction of this network, with a specific focus on discourses of identity, modernity, memory, scholarship and technology. In order to achieve this, we propose a definition of literary heritage that includes the various forms of cultural convention in different media and the tropes and narratives we live by, as well as explicit constructions of the past from a present day perspective. We argue that the dynamics of literary and cultural heritage can only be addressed when these two perspectives are studied interdependently. This twofold vision implies that we analyze literature, media and other forms of textual production as practices that constantly write and rewrite modern and contemporary culture, thereby reiterating as well as contesting dominant values and hierarchies. Hence, our approach has a societal dimension by definition and is always close up the heels of current political, ethical and cultural issues, such as debates about national, European and cosmopolitan forms of identity, conceptions of globalization, multiculturalism and pluralism, or discussions of the cultural impact of science and technology. Departing from the assumption that everyday realities are crucially shaped by the tropes and stories that people live by, we study the cultural representations that

contribute to and interact with these debates. These signifying practices, we find, do not simply consist of reflections on transformations in society, but actively contribute to them as well, precisely because they are not limited to any specific social field, discourse or discipline.

A second important implication of our vision is that we focus on the specific ability of literary texts and other cultural artifacts to establish links between the past, the present and the future. Contemporary cultural production brings the past of a society and its heritage up to date, while it at the same time reworks and remediates this heritage in the light of present-‐day developments and concerns such as globalization and cultural diversification. Here, one can think of practices of cultural memory, the construction of national identity and the formation of heritage, or ethically charged interventions in the public and/or scholarly debate on both historical legacies as contemporary issues. Cultural artifacts, in short, historicize the present, and contemporize the past. Moreover, they project versions of the present into the future; they anticipate upon and invest in developments yet to happen or never to occur at all. Thus, (re)writing culture also implies (re)writing the future.

Methodologically, the members of the research group combine the approaches of cultural history, literary theory and cultural studies. Important basic principles include, but are not limited to: intra-‐ and intertextual analysis of literary culture, discourse analysis of texts and media, and various forms of cultural and ideological critique. In the broadest sense, the initiated research focuses on the interdiscursive relations between literary and cultural phenomena on the one hand, and politics, ethics, economics, sciences, visual culture, scholarship, popular culture, journalism – et cetera – on the other. Thereby, the diverse, yet converging activities of the group aim at a reassessment of modern and contemporary culture as a common and interdisciplinary core concern in the humanities. Envisaged results The research group’s principal aim is to join forces and to develop a distinct profile for the study of modern and contemporary literary culture and heritage at our university. The coherency of the group is safeguarded in monthly meeting in which the group’s (strategic) activities are discussed, such as: joint research proposals (NWO, ERC), co-‐publications, panel proposals, research seminars, Winter/Summer Schools for PhD-‐students (Onderzoekschool Literatuurwetenschap OSL), collaborations with international partners… The research output of the group members will be actively monitored and managed with an eye to the coherence and integration of the program. Specifically, we are aiming at an a large, international conference end 2014, provisionally entitled: ‘(Re)writing the Present’. We will invite several internationally acclaimed key note speakers; a selection of the presented key notes and papers will be published in a book volume or as a special issue of an international, peer reviewed

journal. Additionally, public lectures and debates will be organized in collaboration with Spui25, Studium Generale, Perdu, de Balie, and other institutions. Research interests The research group’s shared concerns are related to urgent questions in both current scholarship as in today’s public debate in/on culture:

• Literary culture and cultural production as privileged domain for the formation and reconfiguration of national (collective) identities; culture’s role in relation to nationalisms since the 19th century on the one hand and the critique of limited notions of identity (cf. the ‘rise’ of world literature, post-‐colonial literature etc.) and of collective identities on the other hand; contextualizing intellectual debates and the role of public intellectuals;

• The topicality of the past and the extended history of the present: culture as a set of practices that construct and undo images of the past and notions of heritage; retaking and remodeling heritage to explore future vistas.

• New perspectives for comparative literary and cultural analysis: rethinking literature, culture and the humanities: not as universalizing projects, but as forms of dynamic, localized cosmopolitanism;

• Analysis of the discourses of cultural heritage and “digital humanities”: Fears of forgetting and fantasies of completeness and contemporary culture and academia; exploration of contemporary ‘archive fever’ and database aesthetics as strategies of a repositioning and reformatting of the humanities;

• Critical engagement with essentialist approaches to the past and heritage and reductive forms of contextualization;

• Opening up the space of literature: the relevance of popular culture, digital writing, non-‐fiction, therapeutic and scientific writing, and the literariness of cultural representations in general.

Group Members On the next pages you find very brief outlines of the group member’s bio’s (affiliation, sketch of research project, key publications) and their email address: Stephan Besser Paul Bijl Yra van Dijk Femke Essink Gaston Franssen Rudolph Glitz Joyce Goggin Tara MacDonald Suze van der Poll Jan Rock Ellen Rutten Guido Snel Lisanne Snelders Thomas Vaessens Sabine van Wesemael

Stephan Besser Assistant professor, modern Dutch literature Situated in the field of literature and science, Stephan Bessers current research focuses on tropes and narratives of contemporary neuroculture from an interdiscursive perspective. Key publications

• Stephan Besser, Pathographie der Tropen. Literatur, Medizin und Kolonialismus um 1900. Würzburg, Königshausen und Neumann, 2013.

• Stephan Besser, ‘Tropenkoller: The Interdiscursive Poetics of a German Colonial Syndrome’. In: G.S. Rousseau et al, Framing and Imagining Disease in Cultural History. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, p.303-‐320.

• Stephan Besser, ‘Germanin: Pharmazeutische Signaturen des deutschen (Post)Kolonialismus’. In: A. Honold & Oliver Simons (eds), Kolonialismus als Kultur. Literatur, Medien, Wissenschaft in der deutschen Gründerzeit des Fremden. Tübingen, Francke, 2002, p.167-‐196.

• Stephan Besser, ‘Neurocultuur. Een kleine verkenning’. Parmentier 21:1, 2012, 21-‐30.

• Marie-‐Aude Baronian, Stephan Besser & Yolande Jansen (eds), Diaspora and Memory: Figures of Displacement in Contemporary Literature, Arts and Politics. Amsterdam/New York, Rodopi, 2006.

Email: [email protected]

Paul Bijl Assistant professor, modern Dutch literature Paul Bijl’s research is on cultural memories of European colonialism. In his project ‘The Transnational Afterlives of Colonized Voices’ he focuses on the memories of the voices of colonized writers in four former colonial empires, (Belgium, France, Great Britain, the Netherlands). The project will investigate how different conditions (such as different forms of colonialism, different colonized regions and different national cultures) impact the ways in which the voices of critical writers have been remembered in the public sphere, both of the metropole of their (former) colonizers and transnationally. Key publications

• P.A.L. Bijl, Emerging Memory: Photographs of Colonial Atrocity in Dutch Cultural Remembrance. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press (forthcoming).

• P.A.L. Bijl, ‘Dutch Colonial Nostalgia across Decolonization’. Journal of Dutch Literature 4, 2013. http://journalofdutchliterature.org (forthcoming).

• P.A.L. Bijl, ‘Colonial memory and Forgetting in the Netherlands and Indonesia’. Journal of Genocide Research, 14-‐3/4, p.441-‐461.

• P.A.L. Bijl, ‘Embodying Colonial Photography: Remembering Violence in Tabee Toean’. Depth of Field, 1-‐1, 2012. http://journal.depthoffield.eu.

• P.A.L. Bijl, ‘Old, Eternal and Future Light in the Dutch East Indies: Colonial Photographs and the History of the Globe’. In: Astrid Erll & Ann Rigney (Eds), Mediation, remediation, and the dynamics of cultural memory. Berlin, Gruyter, 2009, p.49-‐65.


Yra van Dijk Assistant professor, modern Dutch literature Yra van Dijk’s research interest lays with literature, media and memory. She studies the cultural and aesthetic effects of transforming materialities of texts. Key publications

• Yra van Dijk, ‘Reading the form. The function of typographic blanks in modern poetry’. In: Word and Image 27-‐4, 2011, p.407-‐415.

• Yra van Dijk, ‘A Performance of Reality. Handwriting and paper in digital literature’. In: Journal of Dutch Literature 3-‐1, 2011.

• Thomas Vaessens and Yra van Dijk (eds), Reconsidering the Postmodern: European Literature Beyond Relativism. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011.

• Yra van Dijk, Maarten De Pourcq en Carl de Strycker (eds), Draden in het donker. Intertekstualiteit in theorie en praktijk. Nijmegen, Vantilt, 2013.

• Yra van Dijk: ‘Picking up the pieces. History and memory in European digital literature’, in: Marcel Cornis-‐Pope, Literature and Multimedia in late 20th and 21st Century Europe. John Benjamins Press Series on Histories of Literatures in European Languages. Forthcoming.


Femke Essink PhD-‐student, modern Dutch literature Project: Adaptation and the Heritage of the Sixties My research project focuses on the shifting appreciation of the heritage of the sixties. The cultural transformation that commenced in this mythical decade has been of major normative influence on Western society, particularly in the socio-‐cultural domain. Many of the perceived achievements considered natural in this day and age are associated with the democratizing and emancipatory developments of the sixties. However, in contemporary society, this heritage of the sixties is subject to debate. This especially is remarkable in the Netherlands, since in this particular era, the country developed from a rather inward and paternalistic nation into a progressive and tolerant society. Using the sequential adaptations of Dutch literary texts from the sixties I will trace and explain the continuous (re)construction of the myth of the sixties. This project is hereby situated within the discipline of adaptation studies: adaptations are understood as reflexive spaces where implicit and/or explicit ideological assumptions are being reconsidered. This project outlines how literary texts from the sixties enter into a discussion with their contemporary counterparts and how adaptations pass on the heritage of the sixties in an altered form. Email: [email protected]

Gaston Franssen Assistant professor, modern Dutch literature Gaston Franssen’s research focuses on the impact of cultural diversification on modern literature and literary culture. Research topics include contemporary Dutch and American-‐English literature, reception aesthetics, bestseller authorship, literary celebrity, performance poetry, therapeutic fiction/fictional therapy, and the relationship between literature and popular culture in general. Key publications

• Gaston Franssen, ‘The Performance of Poeticity: Stage Fright and Text Anxiety in Dutch Performance Poetry since the 1960s. In: Authorship 1-‐2, 2012, p.1-‐20.

• Gaston Franssen, ‘Literary Celebrity and the Discourse on Authorship in Dutch Literature’. In: Journal of Dutch Literature 1-‐1, 2010, p.91-‐113.

• Gaston Franssen, ‘Intertekstualiteit versus interdiscursiviteit’. In: Yra van Dijk, Maarten de Pourcq, Carl de Strycker (eds), Draden in het donker: intertekstualiteit in theorie en praktijk. Nijmegen, Vantilt, 2013, p.231-‐248.

• Gaston Franssen. ‘Van spiegels en vensters: de retorica van het canondebat’. In: Lizet Duyvendak, Saskia Pieterse (eds), Van spiegels en vensters: de literaire canon in Nederland. Hilversum, Verloren, 2009, p.97-‐112.

• Gaston Franssen, gerrit kouwenaar en de politiek van het lezen. Nijmegen, Vantilt 2008.


Rudolph Glitz Assistant professor, English literature Rudolph Glitz is interested in literary representations – and enactments – of generational and age group politics. How exactly do particular works of literature contribute to the identity formation of, say, youth in Early Modernity or the so-‐called Generation of 1914. How do such age-‐based groups interrelate with similar ones in and through literature? And how with other social formations (e.g. class, race, gender)? Key publications

• ‘The Fertile Fields of the Unpoetic'. In: La traductière: revue franco-‐anglaise de poésie et art visuel 29, 2011, p.134-‐144.

• ‘Making Worlds Historical: The Politics and Aesthetics of Sid Meier’s Civilization Series’. In: Ansgar Nünning et al. (Eds), The Aesthetics and Politics of Cultural Worldmaking. Trier, WVT, 2010, p.161-‐180.

• Writing the Victorians: The Early Twentieth-‐Century Family Chronicle. Heidelberg, Universitätsverlag Winter, 2009.

• ‘Horrifying Ho(l)mes: Conan Doyle's Bachelor Detective and the Aesthetics of Domestic Realism’. In: Paul Fox & Koray Melikoglu (Eds), Formal Investigations: Aesthetic Style in Late-‐Victorian and Edwardian Detective Fiction. Stuttgart, Ibidem, 2007, p.1-‐28.

• Current article project (drafts presented at various institutions): ‘“Young Men Must Live”: Age Group Politics in Shakespeare’s Henriad’


Joyce Goggin Associate professor, English literature Joyce Goggin’s research focuses on literature, film, painting and new media, which she approaches from an economic point of view. Key publications

• Joyce Goggin, ‘Qu’est qu’on réadapte? Ocean’s Eleven et l’esthétique de la finance’. In: A. Hudelet & S. Wells-‐Lassagne, De la page blanche aux salles obscures: Adaptation et réadaption dans le monde Anglophone. Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2011, p.49-‐59.

• Joyce Goggin, ‘Of Gutters and Guttersnipes: Hogarth's Legacy’. In: Joyce Goggin & Dan Hassler-‐Forest (Eds), The Rise and Reason of Comics and Graphic Literature: Critical Essays on the Form. Jefferson, McFarland, 2010, p.5-‐25.

• Joyce Goggin, ‘A Body Hermeneutic? Corpus Simsi or Reading Like a Sim’. In: G. Mitrano & E. Jarosinski (Eds), The Hand of the Interpreter: Essays on Meaning after Theory. Bern, Peter Lang, 2008, p.205-‐223.

• Joyce Goggin, ‘Reading and watching: literature and games. In D. Schram (Ed.), Reading and watching: what does the written word have that images don't? Delft, Eburon, p.79-‐92.


Tara MacDonald Assistant professor, English literature Tara MacDonald’s research focuses on Victorian and neo-‐Victorian literature, gender, and sexuality. Her new projects include a monograph on British sensation novels of the 1860s, tentatively titled Reading, Writing, and Feeling in Victorian Sensation Fiction, and a special journal issue on Neo-‐Victorianism and feminism. Key publications

• Tara MacDonald and Anne-‐Marie Beller (Eds), Beyond Braddon: Re-‐Assessing Female Sensationalists. Special Issue of Women’s Writing 20-‐2, 2013.

• Tara MacDonald, ‘Sensation Fiction, Gender and Identity’. In: Andrew Mangham (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Sensation Fiction. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

• Tara MacDonald, ‘The Failure of the New Man: Masculinity in The Odd Women’. In: Christine Huguet and Simon J. James (Eds), George Gissing and the Woman Question: Convention and Dissent. Ashgate, 2013.

• Tara MacDonald, ‘Doctors, Dandies and New Men: Ella Hepworth Dixon and Late-‐Century Masculinities’. In: Women’s Writing 19-‐1, 2012, p.41-‐57.

• Tara MacDonald, ‘‘Vulgar Publicity’ and Problems of Privacy in Margaret Oliphant’s Salem Chapel’. In: Critical Survey. Special Issue on Other Sensations (Ed. Janice Allan), 23-‐1, 2011, p.25-‐41.


Suze van der Poll Assistant professor, Scandinavian literature Suze van der Poll’s research interest lies in visual arts, culture and literature, adopting a transnational perspective on late post-‐modern Scandinavian literature. Special interest in literature as cultural memory, autonarration. Other fields of interest: theatre and national identity Key publications

• Suze van der Poll, ‘Norwegian literature: the return of the narrative’. In T. Vaessens & Y. van Dijk (Eds), Reconsidering the Postmoder. European Literature Beyond Relativism. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, p.133-‐148.

• Suze van der Poll & R. van der Zalm, Henrik Ibsen. De zomer beschrijf je het best op een winterdag: brieven: geselecteerd, vertaald, ingeleid en van commentaar voorzien door Suze van der Poll & R. van der Zalm. Amsterdam, De Arbeiderspers, 2009.

• Suze van der Poll, Realismer i norsk samtidsprosa. Dissertation UvA, Amsterdam 2009.

• Suze van der Poll, ‘Maskeblomstfamilien. En hybrid?’. In: Christine Hamm, Jørgen Magnus Sejersted og Lars Rune Waage (red), Tekster på tvers. Trondheim, Tapir Akademisk Forlag, 2008, p.297-‐209.


Jan Rock Postdoctoral researcher, modern Dutch literature Jan Rock’s postdoctoral research project investigates virtual collections of Dutch literary heritage from pre-‐digital times and both scholarly and popular uses made of them. He focuses on two twentieth-‐century cases: the Bibliotheca Neerlandica Manuscripta (Leiden) and the Letterkundig Museum (The Hague). Key publications

• Jan Rock, Papieren monumenten. Over diepe breuken en lange lijnen in de geschiedenis van tekstedities in de Nederlanden 1591-‐1863. Doctoral thesis: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

• David Van Reybrouck, R. De Bont, & Jan Rock, ‘Material Rhetoric: Spreading Stones and Showing Bones in the Study of Prehistory’. In Science in Context 22, p.195-‐216.

• Jan Rock, ‘“Remember Dousa!” Literary historicism and scholarly traditions in Dutch philology before 1860’. T. van Kalmthout & H. Zuidervaart (eds), The Practice of Philology in the Nineteenth Century Netherlands. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press [submitted for peer review, 11.980 words].

• Jan Rock, ‘‘De Ezel die een Leeuwenhuid aangedaan hadt’. De ontmaskering van Klaas Kolijn en de Nederlandse filologie (1709-‐1777)’. In: De Achttiende Eeuw 41-‐1, p.75-‐93.

• Jan Rock, ‘Ridders van de natie en van de academie. De kroniek van Jan van Heelu tussen nationale epiek en internationale geleerdheid 1836-‐1848’. In: N. Bemong, M. Kemperink, M. Mathijsen & T. Sintobin (eds), Naties in een spanningsveld. Tegenstrijdige bewegingen in de processen van identiteitsvorming in de negentiende-‐eeuwse Lage Landen. Nijmegen, Vantilt, 2013.


Ellen Rutten Full professor, Russian literature Ellen Rutten adopts a transnational perspective to explore post-‐Soviet Russian culture, literature, art, and design; she has a special interest in digital media, memory, and emotion studies. Key publications

• Ellen Rutten, ‘Old Conflicts, New Media: Post-‐Socialist Digital Memories’. In: E. Rutten, J. Fedor, V. Zvereva (Eds), Memory, Conflict and Media: Web Wars in Post-‐Socialist States. New York, Routledge (in print).

• Ellen Rutten, ‘Post-‐Communist Sincerity and Sorokin’s Thrilogy’. In: B. Lange, N. Weller, G. Witte (Eds), Die nicht mehr neuen Menschen: russische Filme und Romane der Jahrtausendwende. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach: Sonderband 79 (p.27-‐55). Munich, Sagner, 2012.

• Ellen Rutten, ‘Russian Literature: Reviving Sincerity in the Post-‐Soviet World’. In: Y. van Dijk & T. Vaessens (Eds), Reconsidering the Postmodern: European Literature Beyond Relativism. Chicago/Amsterdam, Chicago/Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p.27-‐41.

• Ellen Rutten, ‘Web Wars: Digital Diasporas and the Language of Memory’. In: Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 4, 2010: War, Conflict and Commemoration in the Age of Digital Reproduction (ed. Adi Kuntsman).

• Ellen Rutten, ‘Art as Therapy. Sorokin’s Strifle with the Soviet Trauma Across Media’. In: Russian Literature 65-‐4, 2009, p.539-‐559.


Guido Snel Assistant professor, European Studies Guido Snel’s research interest is with art and literature that was made or written during the Bosnian war, or that reflects on it. Other fields of research interest: multilingualism, literature as cultural memory, and debates on the (non)sense of a European literature. Key publications

• Guido Snel, ‘Lingua franca in Central Europe after the Disappearance of German’. In: Yearbook of European Studies 29, 2012, p.235-‐252.

• Guido Snel, ‘Post-‐Yugoslav literature: the return of history and the actuality of fiction’. In T. Vaessens & Y. van Dijk (Eds), Reconsidering the postmodern: European literature beyond relativism. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, p.115-‐132.

• Guido Snel, ‘Three Forsaken Poets. Memory and Amnesia in Balkan Modernism’. In: S. Bahun (Ed.), Balkan modernisms: approaches and sources. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.

• Guido Snel, ‘Miloš Crnjanski in exile’. In: J. Neubauer & B.Z. Török (Eds), The exile and return of writers from East Central Europe: a compendium. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 2009, p.309-‐324.

• Guido Snel, ‘Dealing with cultural diversity at the borders of the Slavic realm’. In: E. de Haard, W. Honselaar & J. Stelleman (Eds), Literature and beyond: Festschrift for Willem G. Weststeijn on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Amsterdam, Pegasus, 2008, p.737-‐753.


Lisanne Snelders PhD-‐student, modern Dutch literature Project: The Dynamics of Literary Heritage. The Case of the Dutch East Indies This project researches the cultural memory of the Dutch East Indies in literature.The remembrance of the colonial period in the Dutch East Indies, or the ‘Insulinde’ as it has been tenderly called, is a dynamic process of constant negotiation in which media such as literature play an important role. Deploying insights from both memory studies as postcolonial studies, this project takes three postcolonial authors from different ethnic and national backgrounds (Hella Haasse, Tjalie Robinson, Pramoedya Ananta Toer) as its case studies. Besides studying the way in which the work of these authors has been read and framed over time, the project aims to explore the way in which their authorships are being constructed, which factors play a role in these constructions and what the mnemonic effects of these constructions are. Using a discourse-‐analytical approach, it aims at identifying the role literature plays in debates on history and heritage and the way in which literature contributes to the construction of the changing memory of the Dutch East Indies. Email: [email protected]

Thomas Vaessens Full professor, modern Dutch literature Thomas Vaessens’ research interests: modern and contemporary literature, effective history (Wirkungsgeschichte), interdiscursivity (literature and politics, literature and popular culture, literature and ethics...), appropriation, adaptation, functions of literature, literarity, the novel. Key publications

• Thomas Vaessens, ‘Dutch Novelists Beyond ‘Postmodern’ Relativism’. In: Journal of Dutch Literature 2-‐1, 2011, p.5-‐34.

• Thomas Vaessens, ‘Making Overtures: Literature and Journalism, 1968 and 2011 – a Dutch Perspective’. In: Literary Journalism Studies 3-‐2, 2011, p.55-‐72.

• Thomas Vaessens and Yra van Dijk (eds), Reconsidering the Postmodern: European Literature Beyond Relativism. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011.

• Thomas Vaessens, Geschiedenis van de moderne Nederlandse literatuur. Nijmegen, Vantilt, 2013.

• Thomas Vaessens, De revanche van de roman. Literatuur, autoriteit en engagement. Nijmegen, Vantilt, 2009.


Sabine van Wesemael Assistant professor, French literature Sabine van Wesemael’s current research focuses on the extreme contemporary French novel from a interdisciplinary perspective Key publications

• Sabine van Wesemael, Michel Houellebecq. Le plaisir du texte. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2005.

• Sabine van Wesemael, Le roman transgressif contemporain: de Bret Easton Ellis à Michel Houellebecq. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2010.

• Sabine van Wesemael, ‘Tegen de wereld, tegen het leven : over de verwantschap tussen Michel Houellebecq en Arnon Grunberg’. In: Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse taal-‐ en letterkunde 126-‐3, 2010, p.285-‐305.

• Sabine van Wesemael: ‘French literature: postrealims and anti-‐realism’. In: Thomas Vaessens & Yra van Dijk (Eds), Reconsidering the postmodern: European literature beyond relativism, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2011, p.93-‐113.

• Sabine van Wesemael, ‘Ravel de Jean Echenoz: un autoportrait en creux de l’auteur’. In : Jean-‐Michel Wittmann (Ed.), Biographie et roman, Metz, Collection Recherches en littérature, Université de Lorraine, 2012, p.91-‐106.


Documents

Research Group Text, Culture, and Identity