Upload
others
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research ArticleExistence Results for the Periodic Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsaumlcker Equations
Shaowei Chen1 Lishan Lin2 and Liqin Xiao1
1School of Mathematical Sciences Huaqiao University Quanzhou 362021 China2School of Applied Mathematical Sciences Xiamen University of Technology Xiamen 361024 China
Correspondence should be addressed to Shaowei Chen chenswamssaccn
Received 18 October 2014 Accepted 23 December 2014
Academic Editor Hagen Neidhardt
Copyright copy 2015 Shaowei Chen et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
We consider the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker equation minusΔ119906 + 119881(119909)119906 + (1199062 ⋆ (1|119909|))119906 = 120582|119906|119901minus2119906 minus |119906|119902minus2119906 119906 isin 1198671(R3)where 120582 gt 0 is a parameter 2 lt 119901 lt 119902 lt 6 119881 isin 119871infin(R3) is 1-periodic in 119909
119895 for 119895 = 1 2 3 and 0 is in a spectral gap of the operator
minusΔ+119881 Using a new infinite-dimensional linking theorem we prove that for sufficiently small 120582 gt 0 this equation has a nontrivialsolution
1 Introduction and Statement of Results
In this paper we consider the following equation
minus Δ119906 + 119881 (119909) 119906 + (119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
) 119906
= 120582 |119906|
119901minus2119906 minus |119906|
119902minus2119906 119906 isin 119867
1(R3)
(1)
where 2 lt 119901 lt 119902 lt 6 120582 gt 0 is a parameter
119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
= int
R3
119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119910(2)
and 1198671(R3) is the standard Sobolev space with norm119906
1198671(R3) = (intR3
(|nabla119906|
2+ 119906
2)119889119909)
12The potential function 119881 isin 119871infin(R119873) is 1-periodic in 119909
119895
for 119895 = 1 2 3 Under this assumption 120590(119871) the spectrum ofthe operator
119871 = minusΔ + 119881 119871
2(R3) 997888rarr 119871
2(R3) (3)
is a purely continuous spectrum that is bounded below andconsists of closed disjoint intervals ([1 Theorem XIII100])Thus the complement R 120590(119871) consists of open intervalscalled spectral gaps We assume the following
(v) 119881 isin 119871infin(R119873) is 1-periodic in 119909119895for 119895 = 1 2 3 and 0 is
in a spectral gap (minus120572 120573) of minusΔ + 119881 where 0 lt 120572 120573 lt+infin
A solution 119906 of (1) is called nontrivial if 119906 equiv 0 Our mainresult is as follows
Theorem 1 Suppose that 2 lt 119901 lt 119902 lt 6 and (k) is satisfiedThen there exists 120582
0gt 0 such that for any 0 lt 120582 lt 120582
0 the
problem (1) has a nontrivial solution
Equation (1) arises in the study of the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker (TFDW) model for atoms andmolecules with no external potential where 120588 = 1199062 isthe electron density In [2 section VIII] Lieb studied theexistence and symmetric and asymptotic properties ofsolutions to
minus 119860Δ120595 + (119881 + 120572)120595 + (120595
2⋆ |119909|
minus1) 120595 + 120574120595
2119901minus1minus 119862
119890120595
53
= minus120583120595 in R3
(4)
for various choices of119881 Here119860 120572 120574 119862119890 and 120583 are constants
and 119901 gt 43 The term minus119862119890120595
53 is called the Dirac term
Hindawi Publishing CorporationAdvances in Mathematical PhysicsVolume 2015 Article ID 652407 9 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552015652407
2 Advances in Mathematical Physics
with strength 119862119890 In [3] Le Bris considered the minimizing
problem
inf120595isin1198671(R3)int
R31205952119889119909=120582
119864 (120595) (5)
with
119864 (120595) = int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nabla120595
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 120595
2119889119909
+ 119888
1int
R3120595
103119889119909 minus 119888
2int
R3120595
83119889119909
+ int
R3int
R3
120595
2(119909) 120595
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909
(6)
where 1198881and 119888
2are positive constant and 119881 is the Coulomb
potential created by the atomic nuclei Le Bris proved thatthere exists a 120582
119888gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 120582
119888 the problem
admits a minimizer Moreover if 1198882is small enough then the
minimizer is unique Using the Lagrange multiplier it is easyto see that the minimizer of (5) is a solution to
minus Δ120595 + 119881 (119909) 120595 + (120595
2⋆ |119909|
minus1) 120595 + 119888
1120595
73minus 119888
2120595
53
= 120583120595 inR3(7)
for some 120583 However in a recent paper [4] by Lu and Ottothe authors proved that for sufficiently large 120582 the variationalproblem (5) with 119881 = 0 does not have a minimizer Equation(1) with 119881 a periodic function is used to describe a Hartreemodel for crystals (see [5 6]) Moreover when 120582 = 0 (1) isoften referred to theThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsackermodel inthe literature One can see [7] and references therein Finallywe should mention that the so-called Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater equation
minusΔ119906 + 119881 (119909) 119906 + (119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
) 119906 = 120582 |119906|
119901minus2119906 in R
3 (8)
is also related to (1) and has attractedmuch attention in recentyears (see [5 7ndash22])
The variational functional for (1) is given by
119869
120582(119906) =
1
2
int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881 (119909) 119906
2) 119889119909
+
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909 +
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 119906 isin 119867
1(R3)
(9)
In other words the critical points of 119869120582are solutions to (1)
Hence it is natural to use critical point theory to obtainsolutions to (1) Under assumption (v) the quadratic formint
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2)119889119909 has infinite-dimensional positive and
negative spaces It can be shown that for sufficiently small120582 gt 0minus119869
120582has a global infinite-dimensional linking geometry
(for its definition see (64) of Willem [23]) However thedifficulty rises when the classical infinite-dimensional linkingtheorem (see [23]) is used to obtain a critical point to 119869
120582
This theorem requires the functional to satisfy some uppersemicontinuous assumption (see (63) of [23]) Howeverbecause the nonlinearity
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 minus
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909
(10)
is neither positive definite nor negative definite in 1198671(R3)whenever 120582 gt 0 minus119869
120582does not satisfy the upper semicontin-
uous assumption To overcome this difficulty we use a newinfinite-dimensional linking theorem in [24] to obtain a (119862)
119888
sequence (see Definition 6) for minus119869120582 We can prove that a (119862)
119888
sequence for minus119869120582is bounded in1198671(R3) if 120582 gt 0 is sufficiently
small This result is new and original Finally through theconcentration-compactness principle and the (119862)
119888sequence
a nontrivial solution to (1) is obtained Our method can beused to study more general equation like
minusΔ119906 + 119881 (119909) 119906 + (119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
) 119906 = 119891 (119909 119906) 119906 isin 119867
1(R3)
(11)
Notation 119861119903(119886) denotes an open ball of radius 119903 and center
119886 For a Banach space 119883 we denote the dual space of 119883 by119883
1015840 and denote strong and weak convergence in119883 by rarr and respectively For 120593 isin 1198621(119883R) we denote the Frechetderivative of 120593 at 119906 by 1205931015840(119906) The Gateaux derivative of 120593 isdenoted by ⟨1205931015840(119906) V⟩ for all 119906 V isin 119883 119871119902(R3) and 119871119902loc(R
3)
denote the standard 119871119902 space and the locally 119902-integrablefunction space respectively (1 le 119902 le infin) Let Ω be a domaininR119873 (119873 ge 1) 119862infin
0(Ω) is the space of infinitely differentiable
functions with compact support in Ω We use 119874(ℎ) and 119900(ℎ)to mean |119874(ℎ)| le 119862|ℎ| and 119900(ℎ)|ℎ| rarr 0 respectively
2 Variational Setting for (1)
LetD12(R3) be the Hilbert space
D12(R3) = 119906 isin 119871
6(R3) | int
R3|nabla119906|
2119889119909 lt infin (12)
with inner product
(119906 V)D12(R3) = intR3nabla119906nablaV 119889119909 (13)
For 119906 isin 1198671(R3) by the Lax-Milgram theorem the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587119906
2 in R3 (14)
has a unique solution 120601119906isin D12(R3) (see Proposition 22 of
[10]) And byTheorem 221 of [25] 120601119906can be expressed by
120601
119906(119909) = (119906
2⋆
1
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
) (119909) = int
R3
119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119910 119909 isin R3
(15)
The function 120601119906has the following properties
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
Lemma 2 (i) There exists a positive constant 119862 such that forany 119906 isin 1198671(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
119906
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817D12(R3)le 119862 119906
2
1198671(R3) (16)
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nabla120601
119906
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 = 4120587int
R3120601
119906119906
2119889119909
= 4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)le 119862 119906
4
1198671(R3)
(17)
(ii) For any 119906 isin 1198671(R3) 120601119906ge 0 in R3
Proof The inequality
4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)
(18)
can be derived from the the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevinequality (see (11) of [26]) by choosing 119899 = 3 120582 = 1 119901 =119905 = 65 and 119891 = 119892 = 1199062 there For a proof of the otherproperties of 120601
119906in this lemma one can see [8 10 12]
By this lemma the functional 119869120582in (9) is well defined in
119867
1(R3) And a direct computation shows that the derivative
of 119869120582is
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = int
R3(nabla119906nablaV + 119881 (119909) 119906V) 119889119909
+ int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909 + int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
forall119906 V isin 1198671 (R3)
(19)
It is easy to verify that 119869120582is a 1198621 functional in 1198671(R3)
Moreover we have the following
Lemma 3 The following statements are equivalent
(i) 119906 isin 1198671(R3) is a solution of (1)(ii) 119906 is a critical point of 119869
120582
Under the assumption (k) there is a standard variationalsetting for the quadratic formint
R3(|nabla119906|
2+119881(119909)119906
2)119889119909 One can
see section 64 of [23] But for the convenience of the readerwe state it here
Let 119871 be the operator defined by (3) We denote by |119871|12
the square root of the absolute value of119871The domain of |119871|12is the space
119883 = 119867
1(R3) (20)
On 119883 we choose the inner product (119906 V) = intR3|119871|
12119906 sdot
|119871|
12V 119889119909 and the corresponding norm 119906 = radic(119906 119906) Since
0 lies in a gap of the essential spectrum of 119871 there exists anorthogonal decomposition 119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 such that 119884 and 119885 arethe positive and negative spaces corresponding to the spectraldecomposition of 119871 Since 119881 is 1-periodic for all variablesthey are invariant under the action ofZ3 that is for any 119906 isin 119884or 119906 isin 119885 and for any k = (119899
1 119899
2 119899
3) isin Z3 119906(sdot minus k) is also in
119884 or 119885 Furthermore
forall119906 isin 119884 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = (119906 119906) = 119906
2
forall119906 isin 119885 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = minus (119906 119906) = minus 119906
2
(21)
Let 119876 119883 rarr 119885 119875 119883 rarr 119884 be the orthogonal projectionsBy (21)
int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = 119875119906
2minus 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883 (22)
Moreover by119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 we have
119906 = 119875119906 + 119876119906 119906
2= 119875119906
2+ 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883
(23)
By (22) and (9)
minus119869
120582(119906) =
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909 minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 119906 isin 119883
(24)
Moreover by (19)
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = (119876119906 V) minus (119875119906 V)
minus int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
minus int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909 forall119906 V isin 119883
(25)
3 A Global Linking Geometry for minus119869120582
Let 119890119896 be a total orthonormal sequence in 119884 and
|119906| = max119876119906 infin
sum
119896=1
1
2
119896+1
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(119875119906 119890
119896)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(26)
For 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 and 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1 set
119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
119872 = 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 ge 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
le 119877
120597119872 = 119906 isin 119884 | 119906 le 119877
cup 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 gt 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
= 119877
(27)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Definition 4 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) 1206011015840 is called weakly sequen-tially continuous if 119906 isin 119883 and 119906
119899 sub 119883 are such that 119906
119899 119906
then for any 120593 isin 119883 ⟨1206011015840(119906119899) 120593⟩ rarr ⟨120601
1015840(119906) 120593⟩
Lemma 5 The functional minus119869120582satisfies the following
(a) minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous and for every
120582 gt 0
sup119872
(minus119869
120582) lt +infin (28)
(b) There exist 120575 gt 0 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1
and 12058210158400gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 1205821015840
0
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt maxsup
120597119872
(minus119869
120582) sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) (29)
Proof (a) Let 119906 isin 119883 and 119906119899 sub 119883 be such that 119906
119899 119906 as
119899 rarr infin It follows that
(119876119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119876119906 V) (119875119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119875119906 V)
119899 997888rarr infin forallV isin 119883(30)
Since 119906119899 119906 implies 119906
119899rarr 119906 in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt
6 we get that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
(31)
By Lemma 2 we have that 120601119906119899 is bounded in D12(R3)
Therefore up to a subsequence 120601119906119899 120601
119906as 119899 rarr infin It
follows that 120601119906119899rarr 120601
119906in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt 6 This
yields that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3120601
119906119899119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3120601
119906119906V 119889119909 (32)
From (25) (30) (31) and (32) we deduce that as 119899 rarr infin
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) V⟩ 997888rarr ⟨minus1198691015840
120582(119906) V⟩ forallV isin 119862infin
0(R3) (33)
Hence minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous Moreover it is
easy to see that minus119869120582maps bounded sets into bounded sets
hence sup119872(minus119869
120582) lt +infin
(b) If 119906 isin 119885 then 119875119906 = 0 and 119876119906 = 119906 Using (17) we getfrom (24) that for any 119906 isin 119885
minus119869
120582(119906) ge
1
2
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909
ge
1
2
119906
2minus
119862
16120587
119906
4minus
119862
1
119902
119906
119902
(34)
where 1198621comes from the Sobolev inequality 119906
119871119902(R3) le
119862
1119902
1119906 for all 119906 isin 119883 It follows that we can choose
sufficiently small 119903 gt 0 such that for119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt
1
4
119903
2gt 0 (35)
Since 119902 gt 119901 there exists Λ gt 0 such that120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902lt 0 if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt Λ (36)
Let 1198621015840 gt 0 be such that
1199061198712(R3) le 119862
1015840119906 forall119906 isin 119883
(37)
From 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 we deduce that there exists 0 lt 12058210158400lt 1 such
that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400
sup|119905|leΛ
119905
minus2(
120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902) lt
1
4119862
10158402 (38)
From (36) and (38) we deduce that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and
119906 isin 119883minus 119869
120582(119906)
=
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
R3(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
119909||119906(119909)|leΛ
(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
1
4119862
10158402int
R3119906
2119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2
minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
4
119906
2
=
3
4
119876119906
2minus
1
4
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
(39)
FromTheorem 11 of [27] we deduce that there exists 119862lowastgt 0
such that for any 119906 isin 119883
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
ge 119862
lowast(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
(40)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
Let 1199060isin 119885 be such that 119906
0 = 1 And let 119906 = V + 119905119906
0isin
119884 oplusR1199060 Since there exists a continuous projection
119871
2(R3 |119909|
minus12(1 + |ln |119909||)minus1) 997888rarr R119906
0 (41)
we deduce that there exists a constant 119862lowastlowastgt 0 such that for
any 119906 = V + 1199051199060isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
ge 119862
lowastlowast119905
4
(42)
Combining (39)ndash(42) we deduce that there exists a constant120581 gt 0 such that for any 119906 = 119905119906
0+ V isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119905
2minus
1
4
V2 minus 1205811199054 (43)
It follows that
minus119869
120582(119906) 997888rarr minusinfin as 119906 997888rarr infin 119906 isin 119884 oplusR1199060 (44)
Moreover for 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and 119906 isin 119884 (39) implies
minus119869
120582(119906) le minus
1
4
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 0
(45)
Together with (44) this implies that there exists 119877 gt 119903 suchthat
sup120597119872
(minus119869
120582) le 0 lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (46)
From (39) and the definition of | sdot | (see (26)) we havefor 0 lt 120582 le 1205821015840
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119876119906
2le
3
4
|119906|
2
(47)
Choosing 120575 = 119903radic6 (47) and (35) give that
sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (48)
Together with (46) this yields (29)
4 Boundedness of (119862)119888
Sequence of minus119869120582
Definition 6 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) A sequence 119906119899 sub 119883 is called
a (119862)119888sequence for 120601 if
sup119899
120601 (119906
119899) le 119888 (1 +
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1015840(119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198831015840997888rarr 0
as 119899 997888rarr infin(49)
In this section we will prove that if 120582 gt 0 is sufficientlysmall then a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582is bounded in119883
Since 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 there exists119863 gt 0 such that
|119905|
119902minus2minus 120582 |119905|
119901minus2gt
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119881
minus
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)
if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt 1198632
(50)
where 119881minus(119909) = maxminus119881(119909) 0 119909 isin R3
Lemma 7 Suppose that 0 lt 120582 le 1 If 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence
for minus119869120582 then
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (51)
Proof Let V119899= max119906
119899(119909) minus 1198632 0 It is easy to verify that
V119899isin 119883 and V
119899 le 119906
119899 for all 119899 isin N Together with the fact
that 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence of minus119869
120582 this implies ⟨1198691015840(119906
119899) V119899⟩ =
119900(1) where 119900(1) denotes the infinitesimal depending only on119899 that is 119900(1) rarr 0 as 119899 rarr infin Choosing V = V
119899in (19)
by (50) and the fact that 120601119906119899 119906119899 and V
119899are nonnegative in
119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 1198632 we have
119900 (1) = ⟨119869
1015840(119906
119899) V
119899⟩
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
R3120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
R3(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881
+119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
minus 119881
minus(119909) ) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
ge int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 ge
119862(int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
=
119862(int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
(52)
where 119881+= 119881 + 119881
minusge 0 in R3 and 119862 is the Sobolev constant
Note that V119899ge 119906
1198992 on 119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 119863 Together with (52)
this implies
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (53)
Similarly we can prove
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|minus119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (54)
The result of this lemma follows from these two limits
Lemma 8 There exists 120582101584010158400gt 0 such that if 0 lt 120582 lt 12058210158401015840
0and
119906
119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582 then 119906
119899 is bounded in119883
Proof By (1 + 119906119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 we have
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119876119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1) ⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119875119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1)
(55)
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
2 Advances in Mathematical Physics
with strength 119862119890 In [3] Le Bris considered the minimizing
problem
inf120595isin1198671(R3)int
R31205952119889119909=120582
119864 (120595) (5)
with
119864 (120595) = int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nabla120595
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 120595
2119889119909
+ 119888
1int
R3120595
103119889119909 minus 119888
2int
R3120595
83119889119909
+ int
R3int
R3
120595
2(119909) 120595
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909
(6)
where 1198881and 119888
2are positive constant and 119881 is the Coulomb
potential created by the atomic nuclei Le Bris proved thatthere exists a 120582
119888gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 120582
119888 the problem
admits a minimizer Moreover if 1198882is small enough then the
minimizer is unique Using the Lagrange multiplier it is easyto see that the minimizer of (5) is a solution to
minus Δ120595 + 119881 (119909) 120595 + (120595
2⋆ |119909|
minus1) 120595 + 119888
1120595
73minus 119888
2120595
53
= 120583120595 inR3(7)
for some 120583 However in a recent paper [4] by Lu and Ottothe authors proved that for sufficiently large 120582 the variationalproblem (5) with 119881 = 0 does not have a minimizer Equation(1) with 119881 a periodic function is used to describe a Hartreemodel for crystals (see [5 6]) Moreover when 120582 = 0 (1) isoften referred to theThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsackermodel inthe literature One can see [7] and references therein Finallywe should mention that the so-called Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater equation
minusΔ119906 + 119881 (119909) 119906 + (119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
) 119906 = 120582 |119906|
119901minus2119906 in R
3 (8)
is also related to (1) and has attractedmuch attention in recentyears (see [5 7ndash22])
The variational functional for (1) is given by
119869
120582(119906) =
1
2
int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881 (119909) 119906
2) 119889119909
+
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909 +
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 119906 isin 119867
1(R3)
(9)
In other words the critical points of 119869120582are solutions to (1)
Hence it is natural to use critical point theory to obtainsolutions to (1) Under assumption (v) the quadratic formint
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2)119889119909 has infinite-dimensional positive and
negative spaces It can be shown that for sufficiently small120582 gt 0minus119869
120582has a global infinite-dimensional linking geometry
(for its definition see (64) of Willem [23]) However thedifficulty rises when the classical infinite-dimensional linkingtheorem (see [23]) is used to obtain a critical point to 119869
120582
This theorem requires the functional to satisfy some uppersemicontinuous assumption (see (63) of [23]) Howeverbecause the nonlinearity
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 minus
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909
(10)
is neither positive definite nor negative definite in 1198671(R3)whenever 120582 gt 0 minus119869
120582does not satisfy the upper semicontin-
uous assumption To overcome this difficulty we use a newinfinite-dimensional linking theorem in [24] to obtain a (119862)
119888
sequence (see Definition 6) for minus119869120582 We can prove that a (119862)
119888
sequence for minus119869120582is bounded in1198671(R3) if 120582 gt 0 is sufficiently
small This result is new and original Finally through theconcentration-compactness principle and the (119862)
119888sequence
a nontrivial solution to (1) is obtained Our method can beused to study more general equation like
minusΔ119906 + 119881 (119909) 119906 + (119906
2⋆
1
|119909|
) 119906 = 119891 (119909 119906) 119906 isin 119867
1(R3)
(11)
Notation 119861119903(119886) denotes an open ball of radius 119903 and center
119886 For a Banach space 119883 we denote the dual space of 119883 by119883
1015840 and denote strong and weak convergence in119883 by rarr and respectively For 120593 isin 1198621(119883R) we denote the Frechetderivative of 120593 at 119906 by 1205931015840(119906) The Gateaux derivative of 120593 isdenoted by ⟨1205931015840(119906) V⟩ for all 119906 V isin 119883 119871119902(R3) and 119871119902loc(R
3)
denote the standard 119871119902 space and the locally 119902-integrablefunction space respectively (1 le 119902 le infin) Let Ω be a domaininR119873 (119873 ge 1) 119862infin
0(Ω) is the space of infinitely differentiable
functions with compact support in Ω We use 119874(ℎ) and 119900(ℎ)to mean |119874(ℎ)| le 119862|ℎ| and 119900(ℎ)|ℎ| rarr 0 respectively
2 Variational Setting for (1)
LetD12(R3) be the Hilbert space
D12(R3) = 119906 isin 119871
6(R3) | int
R3|nabla119906|
2119889119909 lt infin (12)
with inner product
(119906 V)D12(R3) = intR3nabla119906nablaV 119889119909 (13)
For 119906 isin 1198671(R3) by the Lax-Milgram theorem the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587119906
2 in R3 (14)
has a unique solution 120601119906isin D12(R3) (see Proposition 22 of
[10]) And byTheorem 221 of [25] 120601119906can be expressed by
120601
119906(119909) = (119906
2⋆
1
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
) (119909) = int
R3
119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119910 119909 isin R3
(15)
The function 120601119906has the following properties
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
Lemma 2 (i) There exists a positive constant 119862 such that forany 119906 isin 1198671(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
119906
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817D12(R3)le 119862 119906
2
1198671(R3) (16)
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nabla120601
119906
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 = 4120587int
R3120601
119906119906
2119889119909
= 4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)le 119862 119906
4
1198671(R3)
(17)
(ii) For any 119906 isin 1198671(R3) 120601119906ge 0 in R3
Proof The inequality
4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)
(18)
can be derived from the the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevinequality (see (11) of [26]) by choosing 119899 = 3 120582 = 1 119901 =119905 = 65 and 119891 = 119892 = 1199062 there For a proof of the otherproperties of 120601
119906in this lemma one can see [8 10 12]
By this lemma the functional 119869120582in (9) is well defined in
119867
1(R3) And a direct computation shows that the derivative
of 119869120582is
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = int
R3(nabla119906nablaV + 119881 (119909) 119906V) 119889119909
+ int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909 + int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
forall119906 V isin 1198671 (R3)
(19)
It is easy to verify that 119869120582is a 1198621 functional in 1198671(R3)
Moreover we have the following
Lemma 3 The following statements are equivalent
(i) 119906 isin 1198671(R3) is a solution of (1)(ii) 119906 is a critical point of 119869
120582
Under the assumption (k) there is a standard variationalsetting for the quadratic formint
R3(|nabla119906|
2+119881(119909)119906
2)119889119909 One can
see section 64 of [23] But for the convenience of the readerwe state it here
Let 119871 be the operator defined by (3) We denote by |119871|12
the square root of the absolute value of119871The domain of |119871|12is the space
119883 = 119867
1(R3) (20)
On 119883 we choose the inner product (119906 V) = intR3|119871|
12119906 sdot
|119871|
12V 119889119909 and the corresponding norm 119906 = radic(119906 119906) Since
0 lies in a gap of the essential spectrum of 119871 there exists anorthogonal decomposition 119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 such that 119884 and 119885 arethe positive and negative spaces corresponding to the spectraldecomposition of 119871 Since 119881 is 1-periodic for all variablesthey are invariant under the action ofZ3 that is for any 119906 isin 119884or 119906 isin 119885 and for any k = (119899
1 119899
2 119899
3) isin Z3 119906(sdot minus k) is also in
119884 or 119885 Furthermore
forall119906 isin 119884 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = (119906 119906) = 119906
2
forall119906 isin 119885 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = minus (119906 119906) = minus 119906
2
(21)
Let 119876 119883 rarr 119885 119875 119883 rarr 119884 be the orthogonal projectionsBy (21)
int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = 119875119906
2minus 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883 (22)
Moreover by119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 we have
119906 = 119875119906 + 119876119906 119906
2= 119875119906
2+ 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883
(23)
By (22) and (9)
minus119869
120582(119906) =
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909 minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 119906 isin 119883
(24)
Moreover by (19)
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = (119876119906 V) minus (119875119906 V)
minus int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
minus int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909 forall119906 V isin 119883
(25)
3 A Global Linking Geometry for minus119869120582
Let 119890119896 be a total orthonormal sequence in 119884 and
|119906| = max119876119906 infin
sum
119896=1
1
2
119896+1
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(119875119906 119890
119896)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(26)
For 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 and 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1 set
119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
119872 = 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 ge 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
le 119877
120597119872 = 119906 isin 119884 | 119906 le 119877
cup 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 gt 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
= 119877
(27)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Definition 4 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) 1206011015840 is called weakly sequen-tially continuous if 119906 isin 119883 and 119906
119899 sub 119883 are such that 119906
119899 119906
then for any 120593 isin 119883 ⟨1206011015840(119906119899) 120593⟩ rarr ⟨120601
1015840(119906) 120593⟩
Lemma 5 The functional minus119869120582satisfies the following
(a) minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous and for every
120582 gt 0
sup119872
(minus119869
120582) lt +infin (28)
(b) There exist 120575 gt 0 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1
and 12058210158400gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 1205821015840
0
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt maxsup
120597119872
(minus119869
120582) sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) (29)
Proof (a) Let 119906 isin 119883 and 119906119899 sub 119883 be such that 119906
119899 119906 as
119899 rarr infin It follows that
(119876119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119876119906 V) (119875119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119875119906 V)
119899 997888rarr infin forallV isin 119883(30)
Since 119906119899 119906 implies 119906
119899rarr 119906 in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt
6 we get that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
(31)
By Lemma 2 we have that 120601119906119899 is bounded in D12(R3)
Therefore up to a subsequence 120601119906119899 120601
119906as 119899 rarr infin It
follows that 120601119906119899rarr 120601
119906in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt 6 This
yields that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3120601
119906119899119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3120601
119906119906V 119889119909 (32)
From (25) (30) (31) and (32) we deduce that as 119899 rarr infin
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) V⟩ 997888rarr ⟨minus1198691015840
120582(119906) V⟩ forallV isin 119862infin
0(R3) (33)
Hence minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous Moreover it is
easy to see that minus119869120582maps bounded sets into bounded sets
hence sup119872(minus119869
120582) lt +infin
(b) If 119906 isin 119885 then 119875119906 = 0 and 119876119906 = 119906 Using (17) we getfrom (24) that for any 119906 isin 119885
minus119869
120582(119906) ge
1
2
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909
ge
1
2
119906
2minus
119862
16120587
119906
4minus
119862
1
119902
119906
119902
(34)
where 1198621comes from the Sobolev inequality 119906
119871119902(R3) le
119862
1119902
1119906 for all 119906 isin 119883 It follows that we can choose
sufficiently small 119903 gt 0 such that for119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt
1
4
119903
2gt 0 (35)
Since 119902 gt 119901 there exists Λ gt 0 such that120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902lt 0 if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt Λ (36)
Let 1198621015840 gt 0 be such that
1199061198712(R3) le 119862
1015840119906 forall119906 isin 119883
(37)
From 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 we deduce that there exists 0 lt 12058210158400lt 1 such
that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400
sup|119905|leΛ
119905
minus2(
120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902) lt
1
4119862
10158402 (38)
From (36) and (38) we deduce that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and
119906 isin 119883minus 119869
120582(119906)
=
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
R3(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
119909||119906(119909)|leΛ
(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
1
4119862
10158402int
R3119906
2119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2
minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
4
119906
2
=
3
4
119876119906
2minus
1
4
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
(39)
FromTheorem 11 of [27] we deduce that there exists 119862lowastgt 0
such that for any 119906 isin 119883
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
ge 119862
lowast(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
(40)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
Let 1199060isin 119885 be such that 119906
0 = 1 And let 119906 = V + 119905119906
0isin
119884 oplusR1199060 Since there exists a continuous projection
119871
2(R3 |119909|
minus12(1 + |ln |119909||)minus1) 997888rarr R119906
0 (41)
we deduce that there exists a constant 119862lowastlowastgt 0 such that for
any 119906 = V + 1199051199060isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
ge 119862
lowastlowast119905
4
(42)
Combining (39)ndash(42) we deduce that there exists a constant120581 gt 0 such that for any 119906 = 119905119906
0+ V isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119905
2minus
1
4
V2 minus 1205811199054 (43)
It follows that
minus119869
120582(119906) 997888rarr minusinfin as 119906 997888rarr infin 119906 isin 119884 oplusR1199060 (44)
Moreover for 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and 119906 isin 119884 (39) implies
minus119869
120582(119906) le minus
1
4
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 0
(45)
Together with (44) this implies that there exists 119877 gt 119903 suchthat
sup120597119872
(minus119869
120582) le 0 lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (46)
From (39) and the definition of | sdot | (see (26)) we havefor 0 lt 120582 le 1205821015840
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119876119906
2le
3
4
|119906|
2
(47)
Choosing 120575 = 119903radic6 (47) and (35) give that
sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (48)
Together with (46) this yields (29)
4 Boundedness of (119862)119888
Sequence of minus119869120582
Definition 6 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) A sequence 119906119899 sub 119883 is called
a (119862)119888sequence for 120601 if
sup119899
120601 (119906
119899) le 119888 (1 +
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1015840(119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198831015840997888rarr 0
as 119899 997888rarr infin(49)
In this section we will prove that if 120582 gt 0 is sufficientlysmall then a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582is bounded in119883
Since 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 there exists119863 gt 0 such that
|119905|
119902minus2minus 120582 |119905|
119901minus2gt
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119881
minus
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)
if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt 1198632
(50)
where 119881minus(119909) = maxminus119881(119909) 0 119909 isin R3
Lemma 7 Suppose that 0 lt 120582 le 1 If 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence
for minus119869120582 then
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (51)
Proof Let V119899= max119906
119899(119909) minus 1198632 0 It is easy to verify that
V119899isin 119883 and V
119899 le 119906
119899 for all 119899 isin N Together with the fact
that 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence of minus119869
120582 this implies ⟨1198691015840(119906
119899) V119899⟩ =
119900(1) where 119900(1) denotes the infinitesimal depending only on119899 that is 119900(1) rarr 0 as 119899 rarr infin Choosing V = V
119899in (19)
by (50) and the fact that 120601119906119899 119906119899 and V
119899are nonnegative in
119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 1198632 we have
119900 (1) = ⟨119869
1015840(119906
119899) V
119899⟩
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
R3120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
R3(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881
+119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
minus 119881
minus(119909) ) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
ge int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 ge
119862(int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
=
119862(int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
(52)
where 119881+= 119881 + 119881
minusge 0 in R3 and 119862 is the Sobolev constant
Note that V119899ge 119906
1198992 on 119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 119863 Together with (52)
this implies
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (53)
Similarly we can prove
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|minus119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (54)
The result of this lemma follows from these two limits
Lemma 8 There exists 120582101584010158400gt 0 such that if 0 lt 120582 lt 12058210158401015840
0and
119906
119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582 then 119906
119899 is bounded in119883
Proof By (1 + 119906119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 we have
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119876119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1) ⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119875119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1)
(55)
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 3
Lemma 2 (i) There exists a positive constant 119862 such that forany 119906 isin 1198671(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
119906
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817D12(R3)le 119862 119906
2
1198671(R3) (16)
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nabla120601
119906
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 = 4120587int
R3120601
119906119906
2119889119909
= 4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)le 119862 119906
4
1198671(R3)
(17)
(ii) For any 119906 isin 1198671(R3) 120601119906ge 0 in R3
Proof The inequality
4120587int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 119862 119906
4
119871125(R3)
(18)
can be derived from the the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevinequality (see (11) of [26]) by choosing 119899 = 3 120582 = 1 119901 =119905 = 65 and 119891 = 119892 = 1199062 there For a proof of the otherproperties of 120601
119906in this lemma one can see [8 10 12]
By this lemma the functional 119869120582in (9) is well defined in
119867
1(R3) And a direct computation shows that the derivative
of 119869120582is
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = int
R3(nabla119906nablaV + 119881 (119909) 119906V) 119889119909
+ int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909 + int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
forall119906 V isin 1198671 (R3)
(19)
It is easy to verify that 119869120582is a 1198621 functional in 1198671(R3)
Moreover we have the following
Lemma 3 The following statements are equivalent
(i) 119906 isin 1198671(R3) is a solution of (1)(ii) 119906 is a critical point of 119869
120582
Under the assumption (k) there is a standard variationalsetting for the quadratic formint
R3(|nabla119906|
2+119881(119909)119906
2)119889119909 One can
see section 64 of [23] But for the convenience of the readerwe state it here
Let 119871 be the operator defined by (3) We denote by |119871|12
the square root of the absolute value of119871The domain of |119871|12is the space
119883 = 119867
1(R3) (20)
On 119883 we choose the inner product (119906 V) = intR3|119871|
12119906 sdot
|119871|
12V 119889119909 and the corresponding norm 119906 = radic(119906 119906) Since
0 lies in a gap of the essential spectrum of 119871 there exists anorthogonal decomposition 119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 such that 119884 and 119885 arethe positive and negative spaces corresponding to the spectraldecomposition of 119871 Since 119881 is 1-periodic for all variablesthey are invariant under the action ofZ3 that is for any 119906 isin 119884or 119906 isin 119885 and for any k = (119899
1 119899
2 119899
3) isin Z3 119906(sdot minus k) is also in
119884 or 119885 Furthermore
forall119906 isin 119884 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = (119906 119906) = 119906
2
forall119906 isin 119885 int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = minus (119906 119906) = minus 119906
2
(21)
Let 119876 119883 rarr 119885 119875 119883 rarr 119884 be the orthogonal projectionsBy (21)
int
R3(|nabla119906|
2+ 119881119906
2) 119889119909 = 119875119906
2minus 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883 (22)
Moreover by119883 = 119884 oplus 119885 we have
119906 = 119875119906 + 119876119906 119906
2= 119875119906
2+ 119876119906
2 forall119906 isin 119883
(23)
By (22) and (9)
minus119869
120582(119906) =
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
120582
119901
int
R3|119906|
119901119889119909 minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909 119906 isin 119883
(24)
Moreover by (19)
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906) V⟩ = (119876119906 V) minus (119875119906 V)
minus int
R3int
R3
119906 (119909) V (119909) 1199062 (119910)1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ 120582int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
minus int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909 forall119906 V isin 119883
(25)
3 A Global Linking Geometry for minus119869120582
Let 119890119896 be a total orthonormal sequence in 119884 and
|119906| = max119876119906 infin
sum
119896=1
1
2
119896+1
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(119875119906 119890
119896)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
(26)
For 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 and 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1 set
119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
119872 = 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 ge 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
le 119877
120597119872 = 119906 isin 119884 | 119906 le 119877
cup 119906 + 119905119906
0| 119906 isin 119884 119905 gt 0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906 + 119905119906
0
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
= 119877
(27)
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Definition 4 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) 1206011015840 is called weakly sequen-tially continuous if 119906 isin 119883 and 119906
119899 sub 119883 are such that 119906
119899 119906
then for any 120593 isin 119883 ⟨1206011015840(119906119899) 120593⟩ rarr ⟨120601
1015840(119906) 120593⟩
Lemma 5 The functional minus119869120582satisfies the following
(a) minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous and for every
120582 gt 0
sup119872
(minus119869
120582) lt +infin (28)
(b) There exist 120575 gt 0 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1
and 12058210158400gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 1205821015840
0
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt maxsup
120597119872
(minus119869
120582) sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) (29)
Proof (a) Let 119906 isin 119883 and 119906119899 sub 119883 be such that 119906
119899 119906 as
119899 rarr infin It follows that
(119876119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119876119906 V) (119875119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119875119906 V)
119899 997888rarr infin forallV isin 119883(30)
Since 119906119899 119906 implies 119906
119899rarr 119906 in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt
6 we get that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
(31)
By Lemma 2 we have that 120601119906119899 is bounded in D12(R3)
Therefore up to a subsequence 120601119906119899 120601
119906as 119899 rarr infin It
follows that 120601119906119899rarr 120601
119906in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt 6 This
yields that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3120601
119906119899119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3120601
119906119906V 119889119909 (32)
From (25) (30) (31) and (32) we deduce that as 119899 rarr infin
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) V⟩ 997888rarr ⟨minus1198691015840
120582(119906) V⟩ forallV isin 119862infin
0(R3) (33)
Hence minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous Moreover it is
easy to see that minus119869120582maps bounded sets into bounded sets
hence sup119872(minus119869
120582) lt +infin
(b) If 119906 isin 119885 then 119875119906 = 0 and 119876119906 = 119906 Using (17) we getfrom (24) that for any 119906 isin 119885
minus119869
120582(119906) ge
1
2
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909
ge
1
2
119906
2minus
119862
16120587
119906
4minus
119862
1
119902
119906
119902
(34)
where 1198621comes from the Sobolev inequality 119906
119871119902(R3) le
119862
1119902
1119906 for all 119906 isin 119883 It follows that we can choose
sufficiently small 119903 gt 0 such that for119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt
1
4
119903
2gt 0 (35)
Since 119902 gt 119901 there exists Λ gt 0 such that120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902lt 0 if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt Λ (36)
Let 1198621015840 gt 0 be such that
1199061198712(R3) le 119862
1015840119906 forall119906 isin 119883
(37)
From 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 we deduce that there exists 0 lt 12058210158400lt 1 such
that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400
sup|119905|leΛ
119905
minus2(
120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902) lt
1
4119862
10158402 (38)
From (36) and (38) we deduce that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and
119906 isin 119883minus 119869
120582(119906)
=
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
R3(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
119909||119906(119909)|leΛ
(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
1
4119862
10158402int
R3119906
2119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2
minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
4
119906
2
=
3
4
119876119906
2minus
1
4
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
(39)
FromTheorem 11 of [27] we deduce that there exists 119862lowastgt 0
such that for any 119906 isin 119883
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
ge 119862
lowast(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
(40)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
Let 1199060isin 119885 be such that 119906
0 = 1 And let 119906 = V + 119905119906
0isin
119884 oplusR1199060 Since there exists a continuous projection
119871
2(R3 |119909|
minus12(1 + |ln |119909||)minus1) 997888rarr R119906
0 (41)
we deduce that there exists a constant 119862lowastlowastgt 0 such that for
any 119906 = V + 1199051199060isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
ge 119862
lowastlowast119905
4
(42)
Combining (39)ndash(42) we deduce that there exists a constant120581 gt 0 such that for any 119906 = 119905119906
0+ V isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119905
2minus
1
4
V2 minus 1205811199054 (43)
It follows that
minus119869
120582(119906) 997888rarr minusinfin as 119906 997888rarr infin 119906 isin 119884 oplusR1199060 (44)
Moreover for 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and 119906 isin 119884 (39) implies
minus119869
120582(119906) le minus
1
4
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 0
(45)
Together with (44) this implies that there exists 119877 gt 119903 suchthat
sup120597119872
(minus119869
120582) le 0 lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (46)
From (39) and the definition of | sdot | (see (26)) we havefor 0 lt 120582 le 1205821015840
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119876119906
2le
3
4
|119906|
2
(47)
Choosing 120575 = 119903radic6 (47) and (35) give that
sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (48)
Together with (46) this yields (29)
4 Boundedness of (119862)119888
Sequence of minus119869120582
Definition 6 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) A sequence 119906119899 sub 119883 is called
a (119862)119888sequence for 120601 if
sup119899
120601 (119906
119899) le 119888 (1 +
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1015840(119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198831015840997888rarr 0
as 119899 997888rarr infin(49)
In this section we will prove that if 120582 gt 0 is sufficientlysmall then a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582is bounded in119883
Since 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 there exists119863 gt 0 such that
|119905|
119902minus2minus 120582 |119905|
119901minus2gt
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119881
minus
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)
if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt 1198632
(50)
where 119881minus(119909) = maxminus119881(119909) 0 119909 isin R3
Lemma 7 Suppose that 0 lt 120582 le 1 If 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence
for minus119869120582 then
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (51)
Proof Let V119899= max119906
119899(119909) minus 1198632 0 It is easy to verify that
V119899isin 119883 and V
119899 le 119906
119899 for all 119899 isin N Together with the fact
that 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence of minus119869
120582 this implies ⟨1198691015840(119906
119899) V119899⟩ =
119900(1) where 119900(1) denotes the infinitesimal depending only on119899 that is 119900(1) rarr 0 as 119899 rarr infin Choosing V = V
119899in (19)
by (50) and the fact that 120601119906119899 119906119899 and V
119899are nonnegative in
119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 1198632 we have
119900 (1) = ⟨119869
1015840(119906
119899) V
119899⟩
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
R3120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
R3(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881
+119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
minus 119881
minus(119909) ) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
ge int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 ge
119862(int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
=
119862(int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
(52)
where 119881+= 119881 + 119881
minusge 0 in R3 and 119862 is the Sobolev constant
Note that V119899ge 119906
1198992 on 119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 119863 Together with (52)
this implies
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (53)
Similarly we can prove
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|minus119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (54)
The result of this lemma follows from these two limits
Lemma 8 There exists 120582101584010158400gt 0 such that if 0 lt 120582 lt 12058210158401015840
0and
119906
119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582 then 119906
119899 is bounded in119883
Proof By (1 + 119906119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 we have
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119876119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1) ⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119875119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1)
(55)
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
4 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Definition 4 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) 1206011015840 is called weakly sequen-tially continuous if 119906 isin 119883 and 119906
119899 sub 119883 are such that 119906
119899 119906
then for any 120593 isin 119883 ⟨1206011015840(119906119899) 120593⟩ rarr ⟨120601
1015840(119906) 120593⟩
Lemma 5 The functional minus119869120582satisfies the following
(a) minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous and for every
120582 gt 0
sup119872
(minus119869
120582) lt +infin (28)
(b) There exist 120575 gt 0 119877 gt 119903 gt 0 1199060isin 119885 with 119906
0 = 1
and 12058210158400gt 0 such that for 0 lt 120582 lt 1205821015840
0
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt maxsup
120597119872
(minus119869
120582) sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) (29)
Proof (a) Let 119906 isin 119883 and 119906119899 sub 119883 be such that 119906
119899 119906 as
119899 rarr infin It follows that
(119876119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119876119906 V) (119875119906
119899 V) 997888rarr (119875119906 V)
119899 997888rarr infin forallV isin 119883(30)
Since 119906119899 119906 implies 119906
119899rarr 119906 in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt
6 we get that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119901minus2119906V 119889119909
int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3|119906|
119902minus2119906V 119889119909
(31)
By Lemma 2 we have that 120601119906119899 is bounded in D12(R3)
Therefore up to a subsequence 120601119906119899 120601
119906as 119899 rarr infin It
follows that 120601119906119899rarr 120601
119906in 119871119904loc(R
3) for any 1 le 119904 lt 6 This
yields that for any V isin 119862infin0(R3) as 119899 rarr infin
int
R3120601
119906119899119906
119899V 119889119909 997888rarr int
R3120601
119906119906V 119889119909 (32)
From (25) (30) (31) and (32) we deduce that as 119899 rarr infin
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) V⟩ 997888rarr ⟨minus1198691015840
120582(119906) V⟩ forallV isin 119862infin
0(R3) (33)
Hence minus1198691015840120582is weakly sequentially continuous Moreover it is
easy to see that minus119869120582maps bounded sets into bounded sets
hence sup119872(minus119869
120582) lt +infin
(b) If 119906 isin 119885 then 119875119906 = 0 and 119876119906 = 119906 Using (17) we getfrom (24) that for any 119906 isin 119885
minus119869
120582(119906) ge
1
2
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
minus
1
119902
int
R3|119906|
119902119889119909
ge
1
2
119906
2minus
119862
16120587
119906
4minus
119862
1
119902
119906
119902
(34)
where 1198621comes from the Sobolev inequality 119906
119871119902(R3) le
119862
1119902
1119906 for all 119906 isin 119883 It follows that we can choose
sufficiently small 119903 gt 0 such that for119873 = 119906 isin 119885 | 119906 = 119903
inf119873
(minus119869
120582) gt
1
4
119903
2gt 0 (35)
Since 119902 gt 119901 there exists Λ gt 0 such that120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902lt 0 if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt Λ (36)
Let 1198621015840 gt 0 be such that
1199061198712(R3) le 119862
1015840119906 forall119906 isin 119883
(37)
From 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 we deduce that there exists 0 lt 12058210158400lt 1 such
that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400
sup|119905|leΛ
119905
minus2(
120582
119901
|119905|
119901minus
1
119902
|119905|
119902) lt
1
4119862
10158402 (38)
From (36) and (38) we deduce that for any 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and
119906 isin 119883minus 119869
120582(119906)
=
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
R3(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+ int
119909||119906(119909)|leΛ
(
120582
119901
|119906|
119901minus
1
119902
|119906|
119902)119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
+
1
4119862
10158402int
R3119906
2119889119909
le
1
2
119876119906
2minus
1
2
119875119906
2
minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 +
1
4
119906
2
=
3
4
119876119906
2minus
1
4
119875119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
(39)
FromTheorem 11 of [27] we deduce that there exists 119862lowastgt 0
such that for any 119906 isin 119883
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
ge 119862
lowast(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
(40)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
Let 1199060isin 119885 be such that 119906
0 = 1 And let 119906 = V + 119905119906
0isin
119884 oplusR1199060 Since there exists a continuous projection
119871
2(R3 |119909|
minus12(1 + |ln |119909||)minus1) 997888rarr R119906
0 (41)
we deduce that there exists a constant 119862lowastlowastgt 0 such that for
any 119906 = V + 1199051199060isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
ge 119862
lowastlowast119905
4
(42)
Combining (39)ndash(42) we deduce that there exists a constant120581 gt 0 such that for any 119906 = 119905119906
0+ V isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119905
2minus
1
4
V2 minus 1205811199054 (43)
It follows that
minus119869
120582(119906) 997888rarr minusinfin as 119906 997888rarr infin 119906 isin 119884 oplusR1199060 (44)
Moreover for 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and 119906 isin 119884 (39) implies
minus119869
120582(119906) le minus
1
4
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 0
(45)
Together with (44) this implies that there exists 119877 gt 119903 suchthat
sup120597119872
(minus119869
120582) le 0 lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (46)
From (39) and the definition of | sdot | (see (26)) we havefor 0 lt 120582 le 1205821015840
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119876119906
2le
3
4
|119906|
2
(47)
Choosing 120575 = 119903radic6 (47) and (35) give that
sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (48)
Together with (46) this yields (29)
4 Boundedness of (119862)119888
Sequence of minus119869120582
Definition 6 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) A sequence 119906119899 sub 119883 is called
a (119862)119888sequence for 120601 if
sup119899
120601 (119906
119899) le 119888 (1 +
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1015840(119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198831015840997888rarr 0
as 119899 997888rarr infin(49)
In this section we will prove that if 120582 gt 0 is sufficientlysmall then a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582is bounded in119883
Since 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 there exists119863 gt 0 such that
|119905|
119902minus2minus 120582 |119905|
119901minus2gt
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119881
minus
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)
if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt 1198632
(50)
where 119881minus(119909) = maxminus119881(119909) 0 119909 isin R3
Lemma 7 Suppose that 0 lt 120582 le 1 If 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence
for minus119869120582 then
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (51)
Proof Let V119899= max119906
119899(119909) minus 1198632 0 It is easy to verify that
V119899isin 119883 and V
119899 le 119906
119899 for all 119899 isin N Together with the fact
that 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence of minus119869
120582 this implies ⟨1198691015840(119906
119899) V119899⟩ =
119900(1) where 119900(1) denotes the infinitesimal depending only on119899 that is 119900(1) rarr 0 as 119899 rarr infin Choosing V = V
119899in (19)
by (50) and the fact that 120601119906119899 119906119899 and V
119899are nonnegative in
119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 1198632 we have
119900 (1) = ⟨119869
1015840(119906
119899) V
119899⟩
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
R3120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
R3(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881
+119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
minus 119881
minus(119909) ) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
ge int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 ge
119862(int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
=
119862(int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
(52)
where 119881+= 119881 + 119881
minusge 0 in R3 and 119862 is the Sobolev constant
Note that V119899ge 119906
1198992 on 119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 119863 Together with (52)
this implies
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (53)
Similarly we can prove
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|minus119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (54)
The result of this lemma follows from these two limits
Lemma 8 There exists 120582101584010158400gt 0 such that if 0 lt 120582 lt 12058210158401015840
0and
119906
119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582 then 119906
119899 is bounded in119883
Proof By (1 + 119906119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 we have
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119876119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1) ⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119875119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1)
(55)
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 5
Let 1199060isin 119885 be such that 119906
0 = 1 And let 119906 = V + 119905119906
0isin
119884 oplusR1199060 Since there exists a continuous projection
119871
2(R3 |119909|
minus12(1 + |ln |119909||)minus1) 997888rarr R119906
0 (41)
we deduce that there exists a constant 119862lowastlowastgt 0 such that for
any 119906 = V + 1199051199060isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
(int
R3
119906
2
|119909|
12(1 + |ln |119909||)
119889119909)
2
ge 119862
lowastlowast119905
4
(42)
Combining (39)ndash(42) we deduce that there exists a constant120581 gt 0 such that for any 119906 = 119905119906
0+ V isin 119884 oplusR119906
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119905
2minus
1
4
V2 minus 1205811199054 (43)
It follows that
minus119869
120582(119906) 997888rarr minusinfin as 119906 997888rarr infin 119906 isin 119884 oplusR1199060 (44)
Moreover for 0 lt 120582 le 12058210158400and 119906 isin 119884 (39) implies
minus119869
120582(119906) le minus
1
4
119906
2minus
1
4
int
R3int
R3
119906
2(119909) 119906
2(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910 le 0
(45)
Together with (44) this implies that there exists 119877 gt 119903 suchthat
sup120597119872
(minus119869
120582) le 0 lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (46)
From (39) and the definition of | sdot | (see (26)) we havefor 0 lt 120582 le 1205821015840
0
minus119869
120582(119906) le
3
4
119876119906
2le
3
4
|119906|
2
(47)
Choosing 120575 = 119903radic6 (47) and (35) give that
sup|119906|le120575
(minus119869
120582(119906)) lt inf
119873
(minus119869
120582) (48)
Together with (46) this yields (29)
4 Boundedness of (119862)119888
Sequence of minus119869120582
Definition 6 Let 120601 isin 1198621(119883R) A sequence 119906119899 sub 119883 is called
a (119862)119888sequence for 120601 if
sup119899
120601 (119906
119899) le 119888 (1 +
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1015840(119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198831015840997888rarr 0
as 119899 997888rarr infin(49)
In this section we will prove that if 120582 gt 0 is sufficientlysmall then a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582is bounded in119883
Since 119902 gt 119901 gt 2 there exists119863 gt 0 such that
|119905|
119902minus2minus 120582 |119905|
119901minus2gt
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119881
minus
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)
if 0 lt 120582 le 1 |119905| gt 1198632
(50)
where 119881minus(119909) = maxminus119881(119909) 0 119909 isin R3
Lemma 7 Suppose that 0 lt 120582 le 1 If 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence
for minus119869120582 then
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (51)
Proof Let V119899= max119906
119899(119909) minus 1198632 0 It is easy to verify that
V119899isin 119883 and V
119899 le 119906
119899 for all 119899 isin N Together with the fact
that 119906119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence of minus119869
120582 this implies ⟨1198691015840(119906
119899) V119899⟩ =
119900(1) where 119900(1) denotes the infinitesimal depending only on119899 that is 119900(1) rarr 0 as 119899 rarr infin Choosing V = V
119899in (19)
by (50) and the fact that 120601119906119899 119906119899 and V
119899are nonnegative in
119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 1198632 we have
119900 (1) = ⟨119869
1015840(119906
119899) V
119899⟩
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881 (119909) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
R3120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
R3(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
= int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + int
R3119881
+119906
119899V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
120601
119906119899sdot 119906
119899sdot V119899119889119909
+ int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
minus 120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
minus 119881
minus(119909) ) 119906
119899V119899119889119909
ge int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
nablaV119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 ge
119862(int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
=
119862(int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt1198632
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
V119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909)
13
(52)
where 119881+= 119881 + 119881
minusge 0 in R3 and 119862 is the Sobolev constant
Note that V119899ge 119906
1198992 on 119909 | 119906
119899(119909) gt 119863 Together with (52)
this implies
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (53)
Similarly we can prove
lim119899rarrinfin
int
119909|minus119906119899(119909)gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
6
119889119909 = 0 (54)
The result of this lemma follows from these two limits
Lemma 8 There exists 120582101584010158400gt 0 such that if 0 lt 120582 lt 12058210158401015840
0and
119906
119899 is a (119862)
119888sequence for minus119869
120582 then 119906
119899 is bounded in119883
Proof By (1 + 119906119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 we have
⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119876119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1) ⟨minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119875119906
119899⟩ = 119900 (1)
(55)
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
6 Advances in Mathematical Physics
Choosing V = 119876119906119899and V = 119875119906
119899in (25) (55) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119896
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= minus int
R3119906
119899120601
119906119899sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909
+ int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(56)
By these two equalities and 119906119899
2= 119875119906
119899
2+ 119876119906
119899
2 (see(23)) we obtain
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(57)
Let
120594
1198991(119909) =
1 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
le 119863
0 if 100381610038161003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
gt 119863
(58)
and 1205941198992= 1 minus 120594
1198991 where 119863 comes from (50) Then 1199062
119899=
(119906
119899120594
1198991)
2+ (119906
119899120594
1198992)
2 and
120601
119906119899= 120601
1199061198991205941198991+ 120601
1199061198991205941198992 (59)
Since 1206011199061198991205941198991
is a solution of the equation
minusΔ120601 = 4120587 (119906
119899120594
1198991)
2 in R3
(60)
by (119906119899120594
1198991)
2le 119863
2 in R3 and the standard elliptic estimates(see [28 Theorem 817]) we get that there exists a positiveconstant 119862
2that is independent of 119899 and 119910 isin R3 such that
for any 119910 isin R3
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(1198611(119910))
le 119862
2(int
1198612(119910)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899120594
1198991
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
4
119889119909)
12
le 119862
2119863
2(int
1198612(119910)
119889119909)
12
(61)
Let 1198623= (int
1198612(0)119889119909)
12 By (61)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871infin(R3)le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 (62)
Together with 1206011199061198991205941198991
ge 0 inR3 (see Lemma 2(ii)) this implies
0 le 120601
1199061198991205941198991le 119862
2119862
3119863
2 in R3 (63)
By (57) (59) and (63) we have
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
= int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198991sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
minus int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
120601
1199061198991205941198991119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
+ 120582(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119901(R3)
+ (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871119902(R3)
(64)
Since 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
1198712(R3) le 2119862
1015840119906
119899 (1198621015840 is the constant
coming from (37)) 119876119906119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119901(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 and
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
119871119902(R3) le 119862
10158401015840119906
119899 where 11986210158401015840 is a positive constant
independent of 119899 and 120582 we have1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 120582119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
119889119909)
(119901minus1)119901
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119862
10158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
119889119909)
(119902minus1)119902
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(65)
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 7
By Lemma 7 we deduce that int119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
|119906
119899|
119901119889119909 = 119900(1) and
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863|119906
119899|
119902119889119909 = 119900(1) if 120582 le 1 Together with (63) this
implies that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(66)
Using the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (11) of[26]) we get that
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
1199061198991205941198992sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
(119906
119899120594
1198992(119910))
2
sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(119906
119899120594
1198992)
210038171003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
le 119862
101584010158401015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909)
56
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
(67)
where 119862119867119871119878
and 119862101584010158401015840 are positive constants independent of 119899and 120582 By Lemma 7 we have
int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt119863
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
125
119889119909 = 119900 (1) if 0 lt 120582 le 1 (68)
Combining (68) and (67) with (66) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(69)
Let 0 lt 120598 lt 119863 Then for 0 lt 120582 le 1
(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
le (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus1
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus1
)
2
119889119909)
12
le 2(int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
(
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119901minus2
+
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2119902minus2
) 119889119909)
12
le 4 (120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2) (int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le120598
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909)
12
le 4119862
1015840(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(70)
Combining (70) with (69) yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 1
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 2119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 4119862
10158402(120598
119901minus2+ 120598
119902minus2)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 2119862
1015840(int
119909|120598lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(71)
Let 1205980isin (0min1198631198631(119902minus119901) 1) be such that 411986210158402(120598119901minus2
0+
120598
119902minus2
0) lt 12 Then (71) implies that
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
le 4119862
1015840119863(119862
2119862
3)
121003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
10038171198712(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1) sdot
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
+ 4119862
1015840(int
119909|1205980lt|119906119899(119909)|le119863
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899
minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909)
12
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
(72)
From sup119899(minus119869
120582(119906
119899)) le 119888 and (1+119906
119899)minus119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0
we obtain
119900 (1) + 119888 ge minus119869
120582(119906
119899) +
1
2
⟨119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899) 119906
119899⟩
=
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
minus int
R3(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus (
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
(73)
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
8 Advances in Mathematical Physics
It follows that
1
4
int
R3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909
+ int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899(119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + int
119909||119906119899(119909)|le1205821(119902minus119901)
(120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
minus(
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
)119889119909
+ 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
(74)
where 1198624is a positive constant depending only on 119901 and 119902
Because (12 minus 1119902)|119905|119902 minus120582(12 minus 1119901)|119905|119901 gt 0 if |119905| ge 1205821(119902minus119901)we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
0
int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le int
119909||119906119899(119909)|gt1205821(119902minus119901)
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
(75)
Then by (74) and intR3119906
2
119899120601
119906119899119889119909 ge int
R3119906
2
119899120601
1199061198991205941198991119889119909 =
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
2
1198712(R3)
we get that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus1199010
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
((
1
2
minus
1
119902
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902
minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901
)119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901)int
R3
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
2
119889119909 + 119900 (1)
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(76)
It is easy to verify that there exists a positive constant 1198625
depending only on 119901 119902 119863 and 1205980such that if 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus119901
02
and 1205980le |119905| le 119863 then
119862
5(120582 |119905|
119901minus2119905 minus |119905|
119902minus2119905)
2
le (
1
2
minus
1
119902
) |119905|
119902minus 120582(
1
2
minus
1
119901
) |119905|
119901
(77)
Together with (76) this yields that for 0 lt 120582 le 120598119902minus11990102
1
4
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899120601
12
1199061198991205941198991
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
1198712(R3)
+ 119862
5int
119909|119863ge|119906119899(119909)|gt1205980
(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899)
2
119889119909
le 119888 + 119862
10158402119862
4120582
(119902minus2)(119902minus119901) 10038171003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
2
+ 119900 (1)
(78)
Combining (78) with (72) we deduce that there exists 120582101584010158400isin
(0 120598
119902minus119901
02) that is small enough such that 119906
119899 is bounded if
0 lt 120582 lt 120582
10158401015840
0
5 Proof of Theorem 1
Proof of Theorem 1 Let 1205820= min1205821015840
0 120582
10158401015840
0 where 1205821015840
0and 12058210158401015840
0
are the constants in Lemmas 5 and 8 respectively By Lemmas5 and 8 andTheorem 13 of [24] we deduce that for any 0 lt120582 lt 120582
0 there exists a bounded (119862)
119888sequence 119906
119899 for minus119869
120582
with inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Up to a subsequence either
(a) lim119899rarrinfin
sup119910isinR3 int1198611(119910)
|119906
119899|
2119889119909 = 0 or
(b) there exist 984858 gt 0 and 119886119899isin Z3 such that
int
1198611(119886119899)|119906
119899|
2119889119909 ge 984858
If (a) occurs the Lions lemma (see [23 Theorem 121])implies that 119906
119899satisfies 119906
119899rarr 0 in 119871119904(R3) for any 2 lt 119904 lt 6
It follows that
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119876119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
int
R3(120582
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119901minus2
119906
119899minus
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119906
119899
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119902minus2
119906
119899) sdot 119875119906
119899119889119909 997888rarr 0
(79)
As (67) we have
int
R3119906
119899sdot 120601
119906119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) 119889119909
= int
R3int
R3
119906
2
119899(119910) sdot 119906
119899(119909) sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899) (119909)
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119909 minus 119910
1003816
1003816
1003816
1003816
119889119909 119889119910
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899sdot (119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899)
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
le 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
2
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
100381711987165(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)
= 119862
119867119871119878
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
3
119871125(R3)
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817
119876119906
119899minus 119875119906
119899
1003817
1003817
1003817
1003817119871125(R3)997888rarr 0 119899 997888rarr infin
(80)
Combining (79) and (80) with (57) yields 119906119899 rarr 0 This
contradicts inf119899|119906
119899| gt 0 Therefore case (a) cannot occur
As case (b) therefore occurs 119908119899= 119906
119899(sdot + 119886
119899) satisfies 119908
119899
119906
0= 0 From (1 + 119908
119899) minus 119869
1015840
120582(119908
119899)
1198831015840 = (1 + 119906
119899)
minus 119869
1015840
120582(119906
119899)
1198831015840 rarr 0 and the weakly sequential continuity of
minus119869
1015840
120582 we have that minus1198691015840
120582(119906
0) = 0 Therefore 119906
0is a nontrivial
solution of (1) This completes the proof
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Advances in Mathematical Physics 9
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees fortheir comments and suggestions on the paper Shaowei Chenwas supported by Science Foundation of Huaqiao UniversityandPromotion Program forYoung andMiddle-AgedTeacherin Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University(ZQN-PY119)
References
[1] M Reed and B Simon Methods of Modern MathematicalPhysics IV Analysis of Operators Academic Press New YorkNY USA 1978
[2] E H Lieb ldquoThomas-Fermi and related theories of atoms andmoleculesrdquo Reviews of Modern Physics vol 53 no 4 pp 603ndash641 1981
[3] C Le Bris ldquoSome results on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-vonWeizsacker modelrdquo Differential and Integral Equations vol 6no 2 pp 337ndash353 1993
[4] J Lu and F Otto ldquoNonexistence of a minimizer for Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker modelrdquo Communications on Pureand Applied Mathematics vol 67 no 10 pp 1605ndash1617 2014
[5] I Catto C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoOn some periodic Hartree-typemodels for crystalsrdquoAnnales de lrsquoInstitutHenri Poincare (C)Non Linear Analysis vol 19 no 2 pp 143ndash190 2002
[6] C Le Bris and P-L Lions ldquoFrom atoms to crystals a mathe-matical journeyrdquo Bulletin of the AmericanMathematical SocietyNew Series vol 42 no 3 pp 291ndash363 2005
[7] R Benguria H Brezis and E H Lieb ldquoTheThomas-Fermi-vonWeizsacker theory of atoms andmoleculesrdquoCommunications inMathematical Physics vol 79 no 2 pp 167ndash180 1981
[8] C O Alves M A Souto and S H Soares ldquoSchrodinger-Poisson equations without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz conditionrdquoJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol 377 no2 pp 584ndash592 2011
[9] S Chen and C Wang ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solu-tions for a Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Journal of Mathemati-cal Analysis and Applications vol 411 no 2 pp 787ndash793 2014
[10] T DrsquoAprile and D Mugnai ldquoSolitary waves for nonlinear Klein-Gordon-MAXwell and Schrodinger-MAXwell equationsrdquo Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A vol 134 no5 pp 893ndash906 2004
[11] Z Liu S Guo andZ Zhang ldquoExistence andmultiplicity of solu-tions for a class of sublinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquoTaiwanese Journal of Mathematics vol 17 no 3 pp 857ndash8722013
[12] D Ruiz ldquoThe Schrodinger-Poisson equation under the effect ofa nonlinear local termrdquo Journal of Functional Analysis vol 237no 2 pp 655ndash674 2006
[13] Z Wang and H-S Zhou ldquoPositive solution for a nonlinearstationary Schrodinger-Poisson system in 1198773rdquo Discrete andContinuous Dynamical Systems Series A vol 18 no 4 pp 809ndash816 2007
[14] M H Yang and Z Q Han ldquoExistence and multiplicity resultsfor the nonlinear Schrodinger-Poisson systemsrdquo Nonlinear
Analysis Real World Applications vol 13 no 3 pp 1093ndash11012012
[15] L Zhao and F Zhao ldquoOn the existence of solutions forthe Schrodinger-Poisson equationsrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 346 no 1 pp 155ndash169 2008
[16] A Ambrosetti and D Ruiz ldquoMultiple bound states for theSchrodinger-Poisson problemrdquo Communications in Contempo-rary Mathematics vol 10 no 3 pp 391ndash404 2008
[17] A Azzollini and A Pomponio ldquoGround state solutions for thenonlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Journal of Mathe-matical Analysis and Applications vol 345 no 1 pp 90ndash1082008
[18] S Chen and L Xiao ldquoExistence of multiple nontrivial solutionsfor a strongly indefinite Schrodinger-Poisson systemrdquo Abstractand Applied Analysis vol 2014 Article ID 240208 8 pages 2014
[19] S J Chen and C L Tang ldquoHigh energy solutions for thesuperlinear Schrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Nonlinear Anal-ysis Theory Methods amp Applications vol 71 no 10 pp 4927ndash4934 2009
[20] S Cingolani S Secchi and M Squassina ldquoSemi-classical limitfor Schrodinger equations withmagnetic field andHartree-typenonlinearitiesrdquo Proceedings of the Royal Society of EdinburghSection A Mathematics vol 140 no 5 pp 973ndash1009 2010
[21] M Clapp and D Salazar ldquoPositive and sign changing solutionsto a nonlinear Choquard equationrdquo Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications vol 407 no 1 pp 1ndash15 2013
[22] G M Coclite ldquoA multiplicity result for the nonlinearSchrodinger-Maxwell equationsrdquo Communications in AppliedAnalysis vol 7 no 2-3 pp 417ndash423 2003
[23] M Willem Minimax Theorems Progress in Nonlinear Differ-ential Equations and Their Applications Birkhauser BostonMass USA 1996
[24] S Chen andCWang ldquoAn infinite-dimensional linking theoremwithout upper semi-continuous assumption and its applica-tionsrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol420 no 2 pp 1552ndash1567 2014
[25] L C Evans Partial Differential Equations vol 19 of GraduateStudies in Mathematics American Mathematical Society Prov-idence RI USA 1998
[26] E H Lieb ldquoSharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolevand related inequalitiesrdquo Annals of Mathematics vol 118 no 2pp 349ndash374 1983
[27] D Ruiz ldquoOn the Schrodinger-Poisson-Slater System behaviorof minimizers radial and nonradial casesrdquo Archive for RationalMechanics and Analysis vol 198 no 1 pp 349ndash368 2010
[28] D Gilbarg and N S Trudinger Elliptic Partial DifferentialEquations of Second Order Classics in Mathematics SpringerBerlin Germany 2001
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of