8
Requirements for running a local WHOIS service DB SIG Apricot 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003

Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Requirements for running a local WHOIS service. DB SIG Apricot 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003. Problem. Current requirements for mirroring of WHOIS data in APNIC region not well defined Existing agreements pre-date APNIC conversion to RPSL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

DB SIG

Apricot 15, Taipei, Taiwan

26 February 2003

Page 2: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Problem

• Current requirements for mirroring of WHOIS data in APNIC region not well defined

• Existing agreements pre-date APNIC conversion to RPSL

• Should be formalized, and applicable to all APNIC members with resource management needs

Page 3: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Goals

• Clarify operational and policy issues to permit more widespread use of mirrored WHOIS services

• Enhance member services

• Improve information held on behalf of wider Internet community

Page 4: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Technical requirements

• WHOIS services must be RPSL– The new APNIC WHOIS enforces strict

RPSL compliance checks

• Must support NRTM data exchange method

– Updates will propagate in near real time

• If used for IRR, must support RPSS/related authentication model

– Required for cross-registry authentication

Page 5: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Policy Requirements

• Should meet community standards for data accuracy, detail– Existing APNIC customer

assignment/allocation requirements– Records must be in English

• Should not refer to data outside of allocation/assignment held by member– Will break wider trust model

Page 6: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Other RIRs

• ARIN– Runs Rwhois, a referral model

• Not RPSL based

• LACNIC, RIPE– No equivalent activity at this time

• Wider community– IRR: analogous services, loosely

federated• Doesn’t handle assignment & allocation data

Page 7: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Benefits

• Faster turnaround for data update– NRTM propagates <1min

• Local procedures can be used– Based on existing APNIC templates

• Shared DNS reverse zone management– Use domain: objects to update zone

• Global IRR improvements– Routing objects can refer to other DB

Page 8: Requirements for running a local WHOIS service

Issues

• Scaling: seeking information from RIPE-NCC on software and hardware issues– APNIC will re-resource services to meet load

• Existing agreements with NIR– All existing arrangements will persist– Would like to discuss options with NIR

community

• ERX data will be included after transfer