Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Requirements for Communication Systems in
Future Passenger Air Transportation
Joe Zambrano
École de technologie supérieure – LASSENA
AVIATION 2014, 16–20 June 2014, Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
2
Agenda
• Passenger Air Transportation
• Communications in Passenger Air Transportation
• Current scenario
• Capacity requirements
• Multimode operation approach
• Conclusion
• References
Passenger Air Transportation
3Scheduled airline traffic in 2009
Objective
• Offer a fast and secure transport of passenger from one place to
another place.
Passenger Air Transportation
Commercial aviation forecast
• Passengers/year: 5 billion 12 billion by 2031
• Aircraft movements/year: 77 million nearly double by 2031
4Source: Boeing, 2013
Communications in Passenger Air Transportation
5
In-flight entertainment (IFE)
•1921 – The First in-flight movie (Aeromarine Airways)
•1932 – The first in-flight television called “media event” (Western Air Express)
•1935 – Atari video games were introduced on-board flights (Braniff International
Airways)
•1936 – Piano, lounge, dining room, smoking room, and bar (Airship Hindenburg)
•1937 – The first recorded A/G radiotelephone service on a scheduled flight
(Northwestern Airlines)
•1963 – The the first pneumatic headset used on board (AVID Airline Products)
•1979 – Pneumatic headsets were replaced by electronic headsets
•1982 – The moving-map system information (ASINC, Inc.)
•1985 – The first audio player system based Tape Cassette technology
•…
Communications in Passenger Air Transportation
6
In recent years, IFE has been expanded to include in-flight connectivity.
In-flight entertainment and connectivity (IFEC)
•2000 – High-speed connectivity to commercial aviation (Boeing)
• Satellite telephony
• In-flight broadcast
• Data Communication
• Wi-Fi
• GSM Network
• …
7
Communications in Passenger Air Transportation
"Sky-to-Earth Phone Service Offered On Air Liner"
Popular Mechanics, September 1937
http://arabiansupplychain.com//pictures/gallery/Companies/300x200/Emirates_Infight.jpg
1. Infotainment
2. Office (in-flight)
3. Telemedicine
4. Flight security
5. Logistic & maintenance
Current scenario
8
• At the present time, a
typical scenario in
aeronautical
communications is the
ATN and sub-network
• ATN and sub-networks
are operated between
three principal segments
• These sub-networks
include enhanced
SatCom networks,
CPDLC, FANS, ADS-C,
AIRCOM, etc.
Aeronautical Telecommunication Network (ATN)
Ground Segment
APC
GES
Next Generation Broadband Data
Links / AMSS
ATN G/GRouter
ATN G/GRouter
ATN A/GRouter
ATN A/GRouter
PassengerCommunicationsService Provider
ATC Center AOC Center
HFDL
Mode S VDL2
APC AOC
ATSC
ATSC
ATSC / AOC
ATSC / AOC
User Segment
Space Segment
ATN
ATN data communication environment
Current scenario
9
A/C Earth Station (AES)
Ground Earth Station
(GES)
GES
Service cloud
GES
ATM
AES
SATCOM
Air Traffic Management (ATM)
Wi-FiGSM
A/G BROADBAND
UplinkDownlink
Downlink
Uplink
Terrestrial cellular network with broadband backhaul
links
Service provider network
• Increase in supply and demand of passenger air transportation market,
forces airlines to offer more and more onboard and in-flight services
Overall end-to-end system architecture for A/G broadband and SatCom
Capacity requirements
10
Time
Time
Time
Time
Idle Time
Connection Duration
Session Session Interarrival Time
Reading
Time (Dpc)
Packet
Call
Packet
Interarrival Time
(Dd) Packet Time
Con
nect
ion
Ses
sion
Pac
ket C
all
Pac
ket
(Npc) Packet Call
(Nd) Packet
TSOFFTSON
Packet model for Internet traffic
Npc : mean number of pages
per session,
Dpc : interarrival time between
web pages,
Nd : mean packet number of
packets per page,
Dd : mean value of gap time
between two consecutive
packets
TSON : session active time
TSOFF : session inactive time.
size of each packet.
The estimation of future capacity requirements for a single A/C is based on the ETSI packet
model for Internet traffic
Capacity requirements
11
Another important factor into consideration is Sd, which stands for the size of each packet (datagram).
Where P is normal Pareto distributed random variable (α=1.1, k=81.5 bytes) and m is maximum
allowed packet size, m=66,666 bytes. The probability density function of the datagram becomes:
Where β is the probability that Sd > m :
Capacity requirements
12
Then the mean packet size can be calculated as:
With the parameters above the average size is:
Today’s average web page has surpassed the 1.5 MB mark, arriving to 1.71 MB in February 2014.
At this rate (average increase of 32% per year), the average page size will reach 8 or 9 MB by
2020.
Capacity requirements
13
Therefore, we can use these values to the mean input rate during an active session (Rs) as follows
With the parameters above, the average size is:
A/C Number of passengers
Minimum expected
mean data rate (Mbps)
Minimum expected
mean data rate (MB)
Maximum
expected mean data rate (Mbps)
Maximum
expected mean data rate (MB)
A320 150 - 180 52.43 6.55 62.91 7.86
A330 253 - 440 88.43 11.05 153.79 19.22
A350 270 - 550 94.37 11.80 192.23 24.03
A380 555 - 853 193.98 24.25 298.14 37.27
B737 85 - 215 29.71 3.71 75.15 9.39
B777 301 – 550 105.20 13.15 192.23 24.03
B787 210 – 330 73.40 9.18 115.34 14.42
B747 467 - 605 163.22 20.40 211.46 26.43
Table 1. Number of passengers, minimum and maximum expected mean data rate per A/C type
Capacity requirements
• Another aspect to take into account is the evolution of ACARS.
• ACARS system is limited to 2.4 Kbps.
• At a higher data rate, communications will become impossible.
• To support ACARS traffic growth, the capacity constraints as well as
the Air Traffic Services (ATS), the use of data link and A/C equipage
with (Electronic Flight Bags/Electronic Log Books) EFB/ELB, ACARS
will be replaced by AIRCOM by SITA.
• The key challenge to A/C transition from ACARS to new generation
communications systems is the cost of modifying A/C systems.
• This practically means that A/C will continue to use ACARs until at least
2020 but will increasingly use other data communications links in
parallel. 14
15
Capacity requirements
ATN: Aeronautical Telecom. Network
GEO: Geostationary Earth Orbit GES: Ground Earth Station IRD: Iridium Gateway & message Processor LEO: Low Earth Orbit RGS: Remote Ground Station VGS: VHF Ground Station
Iridium LEO Constellation
Inmarsat / ViaSat GEO Constellation
ATN A/G Router
RGS
GES IRD VGS
Mega Switch (Direct Host Processor)
Airline users and applications
ATN and other
services
AIRCOM Data Link System Architecture
16
Multimode operation approach
Inmarsat Iridium ViaSat
Orbit GEO - Geostationary Earth
Orbit (35,786 Km)
LEO- Low Earth Orbit
(780 Km)
GEO - Geostationary Earth
Orbit (35,786 Km)
Multiple-access scheme FDMA / TDMA FDMA / TDMA MF-TDMA
Modulation types O-QPSK / pi/4-QPSK / 16-
QAM
QPSK / DE-QPSK / DE-
BPSK
QPSK / 8-PSK / 16-APSK /
32-APSK
Latency 1.2 – 3.5 sec 427 ms – 1.7 sec 1.2 – 3.5 sec
Service link L-Band / Ku-Band /Ka-
Band (Global Xpress, 2014)
L-Band / Ka-Band
(Iridium Next, 2015) Ka-Band
Feeder links C-Band / Ku-Band Up: Ka-Band
Down: K-band
Up: Ka-Band
Down: K-band
Services
Voice / Fax / Low-speed
and high-speed data / VoIP
/ Flight Tracking / Safety
services
Voice / Fax / Low data /
Flight Tracking / Safety
services
Voice / Fax / Low-speed and
high-speed data / VoIP
Providers of satellite networks are enormously orienting to utilize Ka-
band for their next generation of satellites
Table 2. SatCom network providers’ features
Multimode operation approach
• In this regard, Software Defined Radio (SDR) are an
ideal platform for prototyping and evaluating airborne
platforms.
• Software routines are perfectly suited for :
Switching to other wireless protocols,
Integrate new standards in A/Cs without substantial cost,
Developing monitoring tools to guarantee QoS, processing
signals for more efficient use of spectrum, and
Ensuring the scalability and configurability of system
17
Multimode operation approach
Considering that in a near future the bulk of the
satellite network will work in Ka-band, we can
propose an approach using SDRs, cognitive
techniques and collaborative avionic network
• Switch between different modulation types
(Multi-modulation / Adaptive modulation).
• Switch between different SatCom networks
(Reconfigurable).
• Demodulate the down converted signals
(Reprogrammable).
• Simulate reception scenarios (Flight
phases).
• Cognitive radio capabilities (Resource
arbitration)
• Scalable design and implementation. 18Software Defined Wideband Radio (SDWR) on
board an A/C Flowchart
Multimode operation approach
Collaborative Avionic Network (CAN)
19
APC
GES Next Generation Broadband Data
Links / AMSS ATN A/G Routers
Passenger Communications Service Provider
ATC Center AOC
Center
HFDL VDL2/3/4
APC AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC ATN
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
A/A Router
ATSC : Air Traffic Security Coordinator
APC : Airline Passenger Communications
AOC: ATN Operational Communications
ATN: Aeronautical Telecomm Network
A/A: Air-to-Air
A/G: Air-to-Ground
G/G: Ground-to-Ground
AMSS: Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service
HFDL: High Frequency Data Link
VDL2/3/4: VHF data link mode 2/3/4
ATN G/G Routers
Guest connection
request
Avalability
Yes
No
A/Areject
connection
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
Yes
A/Aestablish connection and
bandwidth allocation
Yes
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
A/Akeep
connection
Communication link Aircraft-ATN A/G router via A/A router and A/A connection Flowchart
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time
Datatran
smission(Mbps)
APC
ATSC/AOC
Multimode operation approach
Collaborative Avionic Network (CAN)
20
APC
GES Next Generation Broadband Data
Links / AMSS ATN A/G Routers
Passenger Communications Service Provider
ATC Center AOC
Center
HFDL VDL2/3/4
APC AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC ATN
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
A/A Router
ATSC : Air Traffic Security Coordinator
APC : Airline Passenger Communications
AOC: ATN Operational Communications
ATN: Aeronautical Telecomm Network
A/A: Air-to-Air
A/G: Air-to-Ground
G/G: Ground-to-Ground
AMSS: Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service
HFDL: High Frequency Data Link
VDL2/3/4: VHF data link mode 2/3/4
ATN G/G Routers
Guest connection
request
Avalability
Yes
No
A/Areject
connection
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
Yes
A/Aestablish connection and
bandwidth allocation
Yes
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
A/Akeep
connection
Communication link Aircraft-ATN A/G router via A/A router and A/A connection Flowchart
Multimode operation approach
Collaborative Avionic Network (CAN)
21
Guest connection
request
Avalability
Yes
No
A/Areject
connection
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
Yes
A/Aestablish connection and
bandwidth allocation
Yes
Traffic, BW,QoS
No
A/Akeep
connection
Communication link Aircraft-ATN A/G router via A/A router and A/A connection Flowchart
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time
Datatran
smission(Mbps)
APC
ATSC/AOCATSC/AOC
APC
APC
GES Next Generation Broadband Data
Links / AMSS ATN A/G Routers
Passenger Communications Service Provider
ATC Center AOC
Center
HFDL VDL2/3/4
APC AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC ATN
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
A/A Router
ATSC : Air Traffic Security Coordinator
APC : Airline Passenger Communications
AOC: ATN Operational Communications
ATN: Aeronautical Telecomm Network
A/A : Air-to-Air
A/G : Air-to-Ground
G/G : Ground-to-Ground
AMSS : Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service
HFDL : High Frequency Data Link
VDL2/3/4 : VHF data link mode 2/3/4
ATN G/G Routers
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time
Datatran
smission(Mbps)
APC
ATSC/AOC
APC
APC
GES Next Generation Broadband Data
Links / AMSS ATN A/G Routers
Passenger Communications Service Provider
ATC Center AOC
Center
HFDL VDL2/3/4
APC AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC ATN
ATSC / APC / AOC
ATSC / APC / AOC
A/A Router
ATSC : Air Traffic Security Coordinator
APC : Airline Passenger Communications
AOC: ATN Operational Communications
ATN: Aeronautical Telecomm Network
A/A : Air-to-Air
A/G : Air-to-Ground
G/G : Ground-to-Ground
AMSS : Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service
HFDL : High Frequency Data Link
VDL2/3/4 : VHF data link mode 2/3/4
ATN G/G Routers
Multimode operation approach
22Communication link Aircraft-ATN A/G router via A/A router and A/A connection Flowchart
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time
Datatran
smission(Mbps)
APC
ATSC/AOCATSC/AOC
APC
Collaborative Avionic Network (CAN)
Conclusion
• We have presented minimum and maximum expected mean
data rate per A/C type and the number of passengers for
RCSFPAT.
• In future works, these values (29.71 – 300 Mbps) will be useful
for design of avionics communication cognitive networks in terms
of QoS, capacity and data rate.
• In response to the increase in air traffic volume (5% per year),
operational efficiency and environmental issues as well as
enhancing safety, we have presented a solution based on SDR
multimode capable of complementing the services provided by
SatCom network providers in Ka-Band.
23
References
• ACI. 2013. Airports Council International - Global Traffic Forecast 2012-2031. Geneva, Switzerland: DKMA.
• Bard, J., and V. Kovarik. 2007. Software Defined Radio: The Software Communications Architecture. Chichester, West Sussex,
PO19 8SQ, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate.
• Boeing. 2013. «Commercial Aviation Market Forecast 2013-2032». Poster. <http://airfax.com/blog/wp-
content/uploads/2013/06/BoeingForecast-med.jpg>.
• Ding, Lei, Tommaso Melodia, Stella Batalama and Michael J. Medley. 2009. « ROSA: distributed joint routing and dynamic
spectrum allocation in cognitive radio ad hoc networks ». In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Modeling,
analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. (Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain), p. 13-20. 1641810: ACM.
• EUROCONTROL. 2005. SwiftBroadband Capabilities to Support Aeronautical Safety Services - WP3: Airborne Architectures.
TRS064/04: EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION, 55 p.
• Hossain, M. K., A. A. El-Saleh and M. Ismail. 2011. « A comparison between binary and continuous genetic algorithm for
collaborative spectrum optimization in cognitive radio network ». In Research and Development (SCOReD), 2011 IEEE Student
Conference on. (19-20 Dec. 2011), p. 259-264.
• Liu, Zhiyong, Nidal Nasser and Hossam Hassanein. 2013. « Intelligent spectrum assignment and migration in cognitive radio
network ». EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2013, no 1, p. 200.
24