114
REQUESTED BUDGET Fiscal Year 2013-14 February 2013 The Best Park System In The Nation Ed Benedict Park

Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Requested BudgetFiscal Year 2013-14

February 2013

The Best Park System In The Nation

Ed Benedict Park

Page 2: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Portland Parks & Recreation 1120 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1302Portland, Oregon 97204

Nike Fish, Commissioner

Mike Abbaté, Director

Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Finance DepartmentJeff Shaffer, Interim Manager

The Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2013-14 Requested Budget is a complex and enormous project which takes many disciplines throughout the bureau, as well as critical public input. I personally want to thank the following people who contributed throughout this budget process toward the development of this budget.

Sustaining a healthy park and recreation system to make Portland a great place to live, work and play.

Budget Advisory CommitteeMike Abbaté, Director, Portland Parks & RecreationMike Alexander, Parks BoardJudy Bluehorse Skelton, Parks BoardMary Anne Cassin, Parks BoardKathy Fong Stephens, Parks BoardScott Gibson, Labor, Portland Parks & RecreationTim Haberman, Labor, Portland Parks & RecreationNick Hardigg, Parks Board (member ex-officio)Dion Jordan, Parks BoardAndy Nelson, Parks BoardJim Owens, Parks BoardMeryl Redisch, Parks Board (member ex-officio)Linda Robinson, Parks BoardShelli Romero, Parks BoardBob Sallinger, Parks BoardChrista Thoeresz, Parks BoardTricia Tillman, Parks BoardSue Van Brocklin, Parks BoardJulie Vigeland, Parks BoardGerry Verhoef, Labor, Portland Parks & RecreationMauricio Villarreal, Parks Board

Budget Development TeamNick Fish, CommissionerMike Abbaté, DirectorEileen ArgentinaJim BlackwoodMargaret EvansWarren JimenezDeb LevTodd LofgrenPauline MirandaKia SelleyJeff ShafferJason Smith

Jennifer Yocom

Communications TeamJim BlackwoodMargaret EvansJoan HallquistWarren JimenezElizabeth Kennedy-WongMark Ross Jeff Shaffer Jennifer Yocom

BRASS TeamDennis Choquette - LeadBryan AptekarDoug BrennerTerri DavisGregory DubayJosh GreenTim HammockAbbe MacFarlaneAmie MassierHeather McKillipJeff MilkesSally NobleKym RandolphNancy RothAli RyanJamie SandnessDevra StaneartCraig VanderboutJosh Wells

Finance & Analysis TeamDennis ChoquetteAmanda Mundy – Golf/PIRScott Rowe-CIPJeff ShafferJason SmithPauline MirandaDevra StaneartRandy Webster

Page 3: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page i

Table of Contents

Transmittal Letter from Commissioner-In-Charge ........................................................... 1 Budget Advisory Committee Report ................................................................................ 3

Bureau Summary Bureau Overview............................................................................................................. 7 Organization Chart .......................................................................................................... 8 Bureau Mission ............................................................................................................... 9 Strategic Direction ......................................................................................................... 10 Summary of Budget Decisions ................................................................................. 11-20

Capital Budget Bureau Summary .......................................................................................................... 20 Strategic Direction ......................................................................................................... 22 Capital Planning & Budgeting ....................................................................................... 22 Capital Programs & Projects ....................................................................................23-25

Program Area Summaries Recreation ................................................................................................................26-27 Support.....................................................................................................................28-29 Infrastructure ............................................................................................................30-31 Community .................................................................................................................... 32

Performance Measures ........................................................................................................33-35

Summary of Bureau Budget Resources and Requirements....................................................................................... 36 CIP Summary ...........................................................................................................37-39 FTE Summary ..........................................................................................................40-43

Fund Overviews Parks Local Option Levy Fund ...................................................................................... 44 Portland Parks Memorial Fund...................................................................................... 45 Parks Capital Improvements Program Fund ............................................................46-47 Parks Endowment Fund ................................................................................................ 48 Portland International Raceway Fund ........................................................................... 49 Golf Fund ................................................................................................................ 50-51 Golf Revenue Bond Redemption Fund ......................................................................... 52

BRASS Decision Package Summaries ...............................................................................54-89

Five-Year Financial Plans ....................................................................................................91-94

Cost of Service Fee Study .................................................................................................96-103

Customer Service Improvement Status Report .............................................................105-107

Appendix A – Budget Advisory Committee Prioritized List……………………………………108

Page 4: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page ii City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 5: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 1

Page 6: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 2 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 7: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 3

February 4, 2013 Mayor Charlie Hales City of Portland 1221 SW 4th Ave., Ste. 300 Portland, OR 97204 Dear Mayor Hales: For the second year in a row, the Parks Board, with the support of union representatives, served as Portland Parks & Recreation’s Budget Advisory Committee. Our role has been to inform and advise Parks Bureau Director Abbaté and Commissioner Fish on the proposed Parks budget. Frankly, the size and impact of this year’s exercise was overwhelming. After several consecutive years of reductions, our committee again considered deep cuts to the Parks budget. Please know that we are in no way supporters of the proposed reductions. Yet, as requested, we did ultimately support a prioritized list of reductions that are included in this Requested Budget (8 in support, 1 abstain vote, 3 not in support.) Our priorities were based on key values that we developed, in conjunction with guidance you provided: Values Our committee began this process by articulating the values that drive our decisions. These values serve as our “north star.” We hope that you will honor them in evaluating the Parks budget. The values are:

Maintain equitable access to recreation programming, services and or properties and facilities, especially for the most vulnerable populations – pay attention to cultural, demographic and socio-economic impacts

Preserve natural areas and green spaces Maintain our ability to implement the Portland Plan, the Portland Parks & Recreation

Strategic Plan, the Parks 2020 Vision, and support our efforts to pursue a bond measure Maximize our ability to provide services through education, engagement, leverage, or

revenue generation Protect infrastructure by limiting long-term damage to our properties and facilities Preserve living wage jobs and investment in staff

Other Recommendations: I am also writing to inform you that this committee, beyond recommending these cuts, would like to make several additional recommendations about this process and how we fund parks in our city. We feel strongly that these set of recommendations provide more informative and valuable solutions than the recommended list of cut packages. Challenges In recommending these budget cuts, as requested, we create several significant challenges for the Parks Bureau. We feel responsible to articulate them to you:

BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT

Page 8: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 4 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Cuts put in question how public and worker safety mandates will be met. Budget proposals should not create new or worsen existing inequities. Revenue and partnership opportunities should be sought to minimize the effect of the

proposed reductions. The soloing in bureau budget preparations makes it difficult to understand the status of

IAAs and impossible to understand how inter-bureau programs are being coordinated. There is a compounding effect of potential cuts to BES pass-throughs that needs to be considered.

Broad policy changes are needed for mixed-jurisdiction programs – SUN Community Schools and Aging & Disability Services, in particular -- to address where these programs most appropriately reside and how they should be funded.

With a reduction in the Recreation Services and Staffing program, it is important to assess the extent, if any, of reductions in revenues generated over current levels.

Budget decisions would benefit being screened through a fall bond measure lenses. The consequences of Revenue Proposals on access to programs should be assessed.

Parks need a reliable, long-term funding strategy The BAC, and Parks Board, would like to take a solutions-based approach to advising the bureau, perhaps to be partially achieved by establishing regular mechanisms to evaluate/develop/articulate values and priorities and gathering information from staff to develop thoughtful advice. In particular, we are interested in:

How much will the City spend on processes, and at the same time cut staff and resources needed to implement plan. For example, the Tree Code cost thousands to develop, and involved hours of public process. Now, we are not certain of implementation.

Parks SDC’s should recover 100% of costs, but definitely not less than 75%. Historical funding channels, particularly those which resulted from past politics, should be

re-evaluated: o GF one time o BES o SUN - providing funding and support for SUN Schools is consistent with BAC

values; we would, however, consider a reduction to the program (eliminating sites) so long as they align with: SUN Coordinating Council’s research, ratings, recommendations Geographical and racial equity Number of students served Ability to leverage partnerships Sites where there are no other recreation services in the geographic area School performance (test scores); lower scoring schools may need more SUN

resources. Thank you, Mayor Hales, for considering our recommendations. We understand that starting your first term as Mayor with these types of budget challenges must be incredibly difficult. Wealso know that you support and value our parks and that you understand how vitally important a strong parks and recreation system is to the physical, emotional, economic and ecological prosperity of our city.

Page 9: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 5

Sincerely,

Andy Nelson Chair, Parks Board, on behalf of BAC 3215 NE 28th Ave. Portland, OR 97212 (503) 804-8796 Budget Advisory Committee Members & Meeting Schedule The Portland Parks & Recreation Budget Advisory Committee (BAC) is comprised of community members, PP&R supporters, and labor partners. The BAC represents a wide variety of interests from stakeholders across the city. BAC Meetings

January 10 - Room B, 2nd floor, Portland Building January 24 - Southwest Community Center, Multipurpose room January 29 - Peninsula Community Center (room TBD)

Portland Parks Board Members Mike Alexander, Judy BlueHorse Skelton, Mary Anne Cassin, Kathy Fong Stephens, Nick Hardigg (member ex-officio), Dion Jordan, Andy Nelson, Tony Magliano (member ex-officio), Jim Owens, Meryl Redisch (member ex-officio), Linda Robinson, Shelli Romero, Bob Sallinger, Christa Thoeresz, Tricia Tillman, Sue Van Brocklin, Julie Vigeland, Mauricio Villarreal Labor Partners Scott Gibson (PP&R Park Services) - DCTU Tim Haberman (PP&R Recreation) - Local 483 Gerry Verhoef (PP&R Engineering) - COPPEA

Page 10: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 6 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 11: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 7

SECTION 4 - Bureau Summary

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Nick Fish, Commissioner-in-ChargeMike Abbaté, Director

Percent of City Budget

Bureau Programs

Bureau Overview

Expenditures Revised

FY 2012-13 RequestedFY 2013-14

Change fromPrior Year

PercentChange

Operating 86,787,056 84,630,720 (2,156,336) (2.48)Capital 35,352,189 18,699,553 (16,652,636) (47.10)

Total Requirements 122,139,245 103,330,273 (18,808,972) (15.40)Authorized Positions 420.44 421.08 0.65 0.15

Page 12: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 8 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

2 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Mik

e A

bbat

éD

irect

or

Park

& R

ecre

atio

n Se

rvic

esC

ity N

atur

e A

sset

Man

agem

ent

Cen

tral

Ser

vice

s

Con

stru

ctio

n M

gmt

Plan

ning

& D

esig

n

City

Wid

e Pr

ogra

ms

Wes

t Zon

e

PIR

Nor

th/N

orth

east

Zon

e

Gol

f

Sout

h/So

uthe

ast Z

one

Nat

ural

Are

as

Urb

an F

ores

try

Ass

ista

nt D

irect

or

Wor

kfor

ce D

evel

opm

ent

Com

mun

ity R

elat

ions

Bus

ines

s D

evel

opm

ent

Fina

nce

Met

ro B

ond

Secu

rity

Page 13: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 9

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 3

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Bureau SummaryBureau Mission

The mission of Portland Parks & Recreation is to help Portlanders play - providingthe safe places, facilities and programs which promote physical, mental, and socialactivity. We get people, especially kids, outside, active and connected to thecommunity. As we do this, there will be an increase in the wellness of our residentsand the livability of our city.

We accomplish this through:

Establishing and safeguarding the parks, natural resources, and urban forest,thereby ensuring that green spaces are accessible to all;

Developing and maintaining excellent facilities and places for public recreationand community building;

Providing dynamic recreation programs and services that promote health andwell-being for all;

Partnering with the community we serve.

Bureau Overview

Portland's Park &Recreation System

Parks is the steward of a diverse portfolio of parks and recreation facilities usedextensively by the city's residents and visitors. The total parkland managed by thebureau is 11,415 acres, and represents about 12% of the geographical area within thecity of Portland. Not included in this acreage are 238,000 street trees cared for byParks staff. Parks operates 13 swimming pools, 11 community centers, three music/dance centers, five golf courses, and one motor raceway.

The Organization Parks manages one of the nation's most comprehensive park and recreationsystems. The bureau employs over 423 permanent employees and more than 2,800seasonal staff in a variety of roles. Additionally, the organization enhances servicelevels with about 474,000 hours of volunteer time each year. Services are deliveredthrough four departments as follows:

City Nature

This department manages Portland's natural areas, urban forest, recreational trails,street trees, and wildlife habitat in an integrated and sustainable manner.

Parks and Recreation Services

This department delivers services and programs through three geographic zonesthat respond to identified community needs and citywide policies. These includecommunity centers and parks. It also provides citywide operational supportservices.

Asset Management

This department provides bureau-wide direction and guidance for the planning,maintenance, and capital improvements of a sustainable park and recreationsystem.

Page 14: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 10 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

4 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Office of the Director

The Office of the Director provides leadership and advocacy for parks andrecreation at the city, region, state, and national levels. It provides policy direction,financial management and guidance to the bureau, along with public involvement,fundraising and grants management, collaboration and coordination with city andregional partners.

Strategic Direction In 2011, Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) was recognized as the best managedpark system in the nation. This Gold Medal from the National Recreation and ParksAssociation resulted from over a century of recurring community investments,innovative programs, a highly appreciated and motivated staff, and a broadspectrum of parks and facilities.

Unfortunately, the economic downturn has resulted in other changes. In 2008-09,PP&R had one full-time employee for every 24.8 acres of parkland. In 2012-13, thathad changed to one full-time employee for every 27.8 acres - a 5.3% reduction instaffing with a 6.1% increase in parkland. In response, we’ve become more creativeabout our business model, too. As The Oregonian reported last year: ''...the bureau,through its many partner organizations, tapped nearly 16,000 volunteers whocontributed roughly a half-million hours of skills and effort across 93 sites - for ashowing that accounts for more than 20 percent of the agency's workforce.'' What’smore, for every $3 that PP&R spends, at least $1 is from a source other thanPortlanders’ taxes.

Our focus over the next three years will be on actions that close gaps in the parkssystem and recreation programs so that everyone has an opportunity for healthyand active recreation. With one out of five Portland families lacking ready access toa park or natural area, we know that deepening community partnerships is criticalif we are to serve more Portlanders and leverage public investments. Addressinginequities in access to parks and recreation opportunities will be a guiding lens forprioritizing action. The bureau’s 2012-15 Strategic Plan will ensure that PP&Rcontinues to thrive into the future. The 2012-15 PP&R Strategic Plan includes thefollowing themes and associated goals:

Health

Expand active recreation by partnering with the public health community. Contribute to improved health outcomes for youth through increased physical

activity and improved nutrition.

Recreation Services

Connect more youth to the outdoors, physical activity, and their communities. Improve the recreation service delivery model through coordinated

programming, integrated marketing, and supporting services.

Access and Equity

Provide equitable access to developed parks and natural areas within walkingdistance to all residents.

Improve recreation opportunities for underserved communities.

Page 15: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 11

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 5

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Trails

Meet the demand for trails by closing gaps in the trail network. Strengthen management tools for developing and maintaining PP&R trails.

Asset Management

Improve the condition of PP&R’s built and natural assets by implementing anasset management program.

Lower the system-wide risk of assets failure to provide established levels ofservice.

Sustainability

Extend ecologically sustainable landscape management practices over theentire spectrum of PP&R’s green infrastructure.

Reduce consumption of water and energy resources system wide.

Summary of Budget Decisions

The following section provides an overview of PP&R’s core services in the contextof the Mayor’s budget direction for FY 2013 -14. The overview is followed byspecific proposals to add back the bureau’s remaining 10% Current AppropriationLevel (CAL).

Functions, Programs,and Services

PP&R provides an array of facilities, programs, and services to serve a diversecommunity. These range from providing music lessons to coordinating ivy-pullingvolunteers; from providing a solitary hike in the wilds of Forest Park to organizingthe jubilant crowds at the tree lighting ceremony at Pioneer Courthouse Square;from partnering to provide world-class gardens such as the Lan Su Chinese Gardento creating more than a thousand places for Portlanders to garden for themselves.Many of our efforts require collaboration with other City bureaus (Protect the Bestwith the Bureau of Environmental Services) or public agencies (SUN Schools withMultnomah County).

When you ask, ''What is most core to your mission?'' The following rise to the top:

Functions

Ensuring that existing parks, playgrounds, sports fields, natural areas, andtrails are well-managed, clean, safe, ecologically healthy, and accessible to all.

Ensuring that facilities, such as community centers, pools, and restrooms, areclean, safe, and maintained to extend their useful life.

Protecting, acquiring, and expanding the urban forest in the city for the nextgeneration.

Planning for the future.

Programs that promote a healthy, connected city, including:

Community building, lifelong learning, recreation programs, and fitnessactivities at community centers.

Team sports and athletic activities. Aquatics, including swimming lessons.

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 5

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Trails

Meet the demand for trails by closing gaps in the trail network. Strengthen management tools for developing and maintaining PP&R trails.

Asset Management

Improve the condition of PP&R’s built and natural assets by implementing anasset management program.

Lower the system-wide risk of assets failure to provide established levels ofservice.

Sustainability

Extend ecologically sustainable landscape management practices over theentire spectrum of PP&R’s green infrastructure.

Reduce consumption of water and energy resources system wide.

Summary of Budget Decisions

The following section provides an overview of PP&R’s core services in the contextof the Mayor’s budget direction for FY 2013 -14. The overview is followed byspecific proposals to add back the bureau’s remaining 10% Current AppropriationLevel (CAL).

Functions, Programs,and Services

PP&R provides an array of facilities, programs, and services to serve a diversecommunity. These range from providing music lessons to coordinating ivy-pullingvolunteers; from providing a solitary hike in the wilds of Forest Park to organizingthe jubilant crowds at the tree lighting ceremony at Pioneer Courthouse Square;from partnering to provide world-class gardens such as the Lan Su Chinese Gardento creating more than a thousand places for Portlanders to garden for themselves.Many of our efforts require collaboration with other City bureaus (Protect the Bestwith the Bureau of Environmental Services) or public agencies (SUN Schools withMultnomah County).

When you ask, ''What is most core to your mission?'' The following rise to the top:

Functions

Ensuring that existing parks, playgrounds, sports fields, natural areas, andtrails are well-managed, clean, safe, ecologically healthy, and accessible to all.

Ensuring that facilities, such as community centers, pools, and restrooms, areclean, safe, and maintained to extend their useful life.

Protecting, acquiring, and expanding the urban forest in the city for the nextgeneration.

Planning for the future.

Programs that promote a healthy, connected city, including:

Community building, lifelong learning, recreation programs, and fitnessactivities at community centers.

Team sports and athletic activities. Aquatics, including swimming lessons.

Page 16: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 12 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

6 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Services

Providing systems for reserving park properties and facilities for events andactivities or enrolling in classes.

Providing culturally-specific services and creating programming that engagesthe values and strengths of underserved communities.

Providing introduction and access to play in nature. Providing park rangers who promote public safety and, in partnership with the

Portland Police Bureau, make our park system an inclusive and inviting placefor all.

Developing and maintaining partnerships that leverage public resources. Of course, each of these identified core items requires adequate administrative

support, management, and leadership within an organizational structure thatmaximizes efficiencies without reducing effectiveness.

Mandates The following are some of the existing commitments and expectations of PP&R.

City Code

PP&R has the regulatory authority for protecting public trees in parks andrights-of-way, as well as private trees on some residential lots. PP&R staff isresponsible for inspecting and issuing permits for public tree removals andmaintenance. The Urban Forestry Commission advises PP&R and serves as theappeal body for tree permit decisions.

We repair, renovate or rehabilitate assets to prevent health and safety-relatedCode violations and citizen concerns such as uneven sidewalks, accessibilityissues in and around parks and facilities, lighting deficiencies, and lead paint.These projects often reflect the age of the asset or are the result of heavy use bythe community.

PP&R staff provide development review for applicants seeking permitsthrough the City's Bureau of Development Services requiring project review,consultations with applicants, and occasional site visits to further problem-solving. This service is currently provided at no cost.

Per City Council-directed policy, PP&R is to provide the greatest degree ofprotection to the City's parkland and its recreational users. Therefore, itimplements a Non-Park Use Policy to protect, preserve, and enhance the City'sreal property park assets.

The Parks Board, established by City Council in 2001, serves as the primarycitizen advisory group to PP&R. With the foundational purpose to ensure thealignment with the Parks 2020 Vision, this group of Portlanders help guide theBureau.

Page 17: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 13

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 7

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Partnerships and Agreements

PP&R relies on a variety of partners who help steward, advise, and supportPP&R's developed parks, natural areas, facilities, and arts and recreationprograms. These partnerships are essential to maintaining the highest level ofservice, making Portland home to a nationally recognized park and recreationsystem, and ensuring public assets remain open to the public. With over 100partner groups assisting PP&R throughout the city, a primary need for theBureau is to manage and oversee its existing agreements and ensure the publictrust is protected.

Revenues

In the FY 2012-13 PP&R budget, PP&R was mandated by City Council todispose of property and/or raise additional property-related revenue of$400,000 annually.

PP&R also operates under a City Council-directed Cost Recovery Policy toencourage diverse participation and reduce barriers to access to publicrecreation for youth, adults, low income citizens, disabled citizens, seniors, andnew immigrants.

The City of Portland has significant equity and diversity goals. PP&R continues toinvest in those citywide goals, as well as focus resources on PP&R's bureau goalswith regard to equity. Namely, we strive to ensure that our workforce reflects thecommunity we serve and is culturally aware of how to partner and provideservices to that community. We continue to improve our services, making sure wehave strong outreach and engagement with communities who are traditionallyunderserved. These strategic investments ensure PP&R continues to servePortland's changing population.

Narrowing our Mission

The core items outlined above reflect that which we believe are most critical toaccomplishing our mission. However, due to five straight years of budget cuts toPP&R, we will not be able to continue to deliver these core services at the same rateor quality as we have before.

In the past, we have eliminated the public subsidy of some community centers bychanging their business models: either by raising use fees or replacing subsidizedpublic programs with private models. As we look at focusing the mission of ourcommunity centers, we are also considering further changes. These could includeincreasing dependence on revenue generation or reducing staff.

PP&R assets require an estimated additional investment of $35.2 million each yearover the next ten years to maintain our current service levels. To help close ourservice gaps and provide access to the one-fifth of Portland residents that do nothave ready access to a park or natural area, an estimated additional $48.7 million inannual investment is required for the next ten years.

Narrowing our mission at PP&R may require decommissioning some buildingsand reducing the frequency of painting, roof repair, carpentry, and other neededmaintenance activities. Our focus for maintenance and major repairs will be onthose assets that present the highest probability and highest consequence of failure.The safety of our park users is our first priority.

Page 18: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 14 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

8 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Within PP&R's City Nature Division, we are focused on protecting the ecologicalhealth and public access of our natural areas and trails, but these services will bereduced. Other programs may need to be reduced or eliminated just as OutdoorRecreation was eliminated in 2012-13. Going forward, we may need to reduce plantpropagation and eliminate tree nursery programs.

In addition, reductions taken by other bureaus may also narrow our mission.Reductions directly related to storm water and water quality management in ourparks system are being considered by the Bureau of Environmental Services. Theseinclude, among other things, eliminating funding for the Forest Park ranger, treeinspector, Youth Conservation Crew, the Protect the Best Program, and stewardshipin our natural areas.

PP&R has a very robust system for performance measurement. Though the Bureauis still widely supported by the public, in the past few years we have seen a slightdecline in positive public perception. For example, as we have failed to meet ourtarget for funding for major facility maintenance, we note there has been a declinein public perception around our maintenance of facilities. Likewise, withreductions in daily park maintenance, there has been a corresponding drop in thepublic’s opinion about overall park quality.

In the following pages, you will see a summary of 10% add back proposals, one-time add proposals, and revenue proposals. These are the proposals, and theirrelated impacts, that PP&R’s Budget Advisory Committee, Park CommissionerNick Fish, and the PP&R management team are putting forward as part of thebureau’s FY 2013-14 Budget Request.

Program RevenueAdd Back Proposals

PK_12 - Revenue Add Back - Horticultural Work in Parks

This proposal continues two positions that care for developed parks. Threepositions were eliminated in the FY 2012-13 budget. If not restored, we will seepositions reduced by one-third overall, from 15 to 10.

PK_13 - Revenue Add Back - Hoyt Arboretum

This proposal restores funding for a Horticulturalist position ($76,000) andoperating expenses at Hoyt Arboretum ($40,000). The Horticulturalist cares for thecollection, directs volunteer efforts, and performs a variety of other duties to keepthe arboretum clean and safe for the public.

PK_11 - Revenue Add Back - Dutch Elm Disease Program

This proposal restores funding to support PP&R's Dutch Elm Disease (DED)prevention program. This portion of the program currently includes inoculations,monitoring and removal of affected non-park trees. 450 trees are inoculated on athree-year cycle. Relatedly, the Bureau of Environmental Services has indicated thatthey will cut the funding for the DED inoculant for FY 2013-14.

10% Add BackProposals

PK_08 - 10% Add Back - Central Services Maintenance

This proposal restores five positions in PP&R's Central Services, includingmaterials and services related to the work accomplished by these positions. Thefive vacant positions were left unfilled due to city budget direction for FY 2012-13to capture vacancy savings.

Page 19: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 15

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 9

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_14 - 10% Add Back - Natural Area Maintenance

This proposal restores the recently allocated operating funds for PP&R natural areamaintenance, ecological restoration, and trail maintenance work needed for newlyacquired properties. The proposal would allow PP&R to add one Botanic SpecialistFTE to support this work.

PK_19 - 10% Add Back - SUN CS - 3 sites

This proposal continues funding for the three SUN Community Schools that servecomparatively higher-income neighborhoods and that are operated by PP&Rwithin the larger SUN Service System partnership with Multnomah County andPortland School Districts. If not funded by the City or the SUN Service System, thefollowing three PP&R-operated programs, including three full time staff positions,would be discontinued as of the FY 2013-14 academic year: Beaumont, Mt. Tabor,and Roseway Heights.

PK_07 - 10% Add Back - Capital Major Maintenance

This proposal restores $130,000 in funding for Capital Major Maintenance projects.These funds are used for code-mandated improvements, repair, rehabilitation orreplacement of assets.

PK_17 - 10% Add Back - Recreation Services & Staffing

This proposal realigns recreation staffing to create the foundation for a bettercoordinated and more equitable delivery of recreation services. These are serviceswhich are high priority in terms of our mission and are able to leverage significantprogram revenue. If not restored, the scope of recreation activities in communityrecreation facilities, as well as in specialized citywide programs, will be reduced.Additionally, the way we deliver services to Senior and Adaptive InclusiveRecreation programs will be restructured.

PK_09 - 10% Add Back - Central Services Contracted Services

This proposal restores funding for contracted services, including professionalservices and contracting for maintenance, such as replacement of worn flooring incommunity centers. If this proposal is not funded it would reduce the totalallocation for contracted services by 10%.

PK_20 - 10% Add Back - SUN CS Pass Through

This proposal restores PP&R pass through funds to Multnomah County to supportservice delivery in the Department of Human Services SUN Service System. If notfunded by the City or the SUN Service System, the equivalent of two to three SUNprograms would be discontinued.

PK_16 - 10% Add Back Plant Propagation and Tree Nursery Program

This proposal restores funding to support maintaining plant propagation and treenursery programs within PP&R. The proposal includes restoring two positions andallows PP&R to continue to provide plant stock internally at current levels.

Page 20: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 16 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

10 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_18 - 10% Add Back - Sellwood Community Center

This proposal continues the full scope of recreation programs at SellwoodCommunity Center. If not restored, the community center preschool will remainopen, but most other activities will be discontinued with the loss of two full-timestaff for an approximate 75% service reduction.

PK_10 - 10% Add Back Delta Park Athletic Fields

This proposal restores one vacant, full-time Utility Worker II. When filled, theperson in this position assists with pre game preparation of softball and baseballfields, as well as various duties to keep the park clean and safe for the public.

PK_01 - 10% Add Back-Administration Community Relations

This proposal restores funding to support one full-time position within PP&RsCommunity Relations department. This position is 50% web content managementand administration and 50% volunteer services administrative support andcoordination of court-ordered community service volunteers.

PK_03 - 10% Add Back - Administration Safety & Security

This proposal restores one part time Sr. Administrative Specialist position thatprovides administrative services and coordination for the Risk/Safety Program andthe Security/Ranger Program.

PK_15 - 10% Add Back - Pass Through's (Linnton/Leach)

This proposal restores a 10% reduction to the financial assistance PP&R provides totwo partner organizations. These include Leach Garden Friends ($11,600); andLinnton Community Center ($4,472).

PK_05 - 10% Add Back - Aging & Disability Pass Through

This proposal restores $565,819 pass-through funds to the Multnomah CountyAging & Disability Services Access & Early Intervention Program, which passesthrough the funding as follows:

$525,819 goes to District Senior Centers (DCs) for focal point, outreach, healthpromotion, wellness, and social enrichment activities.

$40,000 goes to transport people to their DC sites and medical appointments.

The PP&R pass through represents approximately 1% of Aging & DisabilityServices budget, 6% of the Access & Early Intervention Programs budget, and 26%of the District Senior Centers budget.

PK_06 - 10% Add Back - Buckman Pool

This proposal restores funding to keep Buckman Pool open. The SE Portland pool isowned by Portland Public Schools and has been operated year round, managed byone full-time position. Historically, this pool is PP&R's most expensive to operateper person/per visit.

Page 21: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 17

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 11

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_02 - 10% Add Back - Administration M&S

PP&Rs General Fund allocation is increased on an annual basis to account forinflation. This proposal restores the annual inflation adjustment to all materials andservices line items.

PK_04 - 10% Add Back - Administration Workers Comp

PP&R contributes annual funding to a reserve fund to support WorkersCompensation claims. This proposal restores PP&R workers compensation reservesby $60,000.

PK_22 - 10% Add Back - OMF Internal Services

This proposal restores reductions that have been proposed from the Office ofManagement and Finance as part of their budget request.

1 Time Add Packages PK_23 - 1-Time - Teen Programming

This proposal continues three Teen Service Coordinators and program operatingsupport for five locations at community centers throughout the city. This dedicatedstaffing level will continue for the 8th consecutive year to provide safe andengaging programs and activities for teens. This would be requested again as one-time funding, not ongoing.

PK_24 - 1-Time - Summer Lunch Program

The number of children qualifying for the free or reduced fee lunch at school is atan all-time high. For some children, the meal they receive at school is the onlybalanced meal they may get that day. Once school ends for the year, PP&R is theprimary provider for free lunch distribution in Portland, serving free lunches atSummer Playground program sites and community centers. The SummerPlayground program is typically an 8-week program from mid-June to mid-August. This proposal allows PP&R to extend the summer lunch program to coverthe first and last week of the summer break and reach out to more sites where theneed is greatest. Last summer, the City served over 100,000 lunches through thisprogram. This would be requested again as one-time funding, not ongoing.

BES'S PotentialReductions andPP&R Proposed AddBacks

PK_30 - Forest Park Ranger, BES Interagency Agreement

The Forest Park Ranger (FPR) position is currently funded through an interagencyagreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES is proposing toeliminate funding for this position in FY 2013-14. The FPR educates park users andsupports PP&R and other partners in stewardship efforts within the park,maintaining watershed health and water quality. Ranger efforts in the park help tomaintain health of a major city watershed thus helping to mitigate the impactsassociated with storm water run off. This proposal would replace BES funding withGeneral Fund resources to support the FPR position.

Page 22: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 18 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

12 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_31 - Protect the Best Program, BES Interagency Agreement

The Protect the Best program is currently funded through an interagencyagreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES is proposing toeliminate funding for this program in FY 2013-14. The program is an integral partof the City’s Invasive Species Program focusing on maintaining the ecologicalhealth and stormwater processing capacity of City-owned healthy natural areas.This proposal would replace BES funding with General Fund resources to supportthe Protect the Best Program.

PK_32 - Youth Conservation Crew, BES Interagency Agreement

The Youth Conservation Crew program is currently funded through an interagencyagreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES is proposing toeliminate funding for this program in FY 2013-14. The program providesopportunities and job training for a diverse population of 50-60 Portland-areayouth, ages 14-18 providing maintenance for natural areas and Portland’s treecanopy. Tree and natural area maintenance help manage the City’s watersheds andmanage stormwater runoff, while introducing a new generation to the workforce.This proposal would replace BES funding with General Fund resources to supportthe Youth Conservation Crew program.

PK_33 - Willamette River Stewardship Coordinator, BES Interagency Agreement

The Willamette River Stewardship position is currently funded through aninteragency agreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES isproposing to eliminate funding for this position in FY 2013-14. The programcontributes to maintaining the health of natural area lands that drain directly intothe Willamette River, protecting water quality and reducing stormwater impacts.This proposal would replace BES funding with General Fund resources to supportthe position.

PK_34 - Dutch Elm Disease Inoculent - BES Interagency Agreement

The Dutch Elm Disease inoculant is currently funded through an interagencyagreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES is proposing toeliminate funding for this in FY 2013-14. The inoculant ''Arbotech'' is used toreduce Dutch Elm Disease infection and mortality of American elm trees (U.americana); e.g., in the Park Blocks. Elms make up a visible portion of Portland’smature forest canopy, improving storm water management and air quality. Thisproposal would replace BES funding with General Fund resources to support thetreatment for Dutch Elm Disease.

PK_35 - Urban Forestry Tree Inspector, BES Interagency Agreement

A Tree Inspector position is currently funded through an interagency agreementwith the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES is proposing to eliminatefunding for this position in FY 2013-14. As the position is currently vacant, thefunding has been used to support tree permit intake and tree inspection serviceswhich help maintain Portland’s urban canopy, an important element in managingstorm water runoff in neighborhoods. This proposal would replace BES fundingwith General Fund resources to support the Tree Inspector position.

Page 23: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 19

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 13

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_36 - Urban Forestry Education & Outreach Position, BES InteragencyAgreement

An Urban Forestry Education and Outreach position is currently funded throughan interagency agreement with the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES). BES isproposing to eliminate funding for this position in FY 2013-14. This positioncurrently staffs outreach events, public tree care workshops, and school tree-planting events, leading to increased tree canopy among all parts of the City.Increased tree canopy helps manage stormwater and builds healthierneighborhoods. This proposal would replace BES funding with General Fundresources to support the Education and Outreach position.

Operations &Maintenance

PK_25 - O&M from Acquisitions and Improvements

This package will address ongoing Operations and Maintenance (O&M)requirements of $586,205 for newly acquired or developed properties that wereplaced into service during FY 2012-13. An additional $43,353 of one-time fundshave been allocated to address site specific stabilization costs that have been put offuntil FY 2013-14. Per guidance from the Budget Office, this package also reflectslarge projects with $25,000 or more of estimated O&M for FY 2013-14 that haven’tbeen placed into service yet. Those include a total of $89,028 of new O&M neededfor Dawson Park Improvements and Riverview Natural Area acquisition.

Revenue Proposals PK_26 - Revenue Large Community Centers Admission/Pass Fees

This proposals increases daily admission fees by approximately 50 cents andcorrelating membership pass fees at all five large community centers.

PK_27 - Revenue Non-Resident Fees

The purpose of this proposal is to better ensure that non-residents are paying feesequivalent to what City of Portland (COP) residents are paying through fees andtaxes.

PK_28 - Revenue Swim Lesson Fees

This proposal increases prices for PP&R swim lessons while still maintainingaffordability. Prices for youth swim lessons will increase by $5.00 from $47.50 to$52.50, prices for adult lessons will increase by $10.00, and the price for semi-private swim lessons will increase by $20.00. The revenue raised by this package isalmost entirely (97%) from youth swim lessons. Even with a $5.00 increase in youthlessons, PP&R will still remain among the most affordable in comparison to nearbyproviders of swim lessons:

THPRD - $55.00 for a 10, 30-minute youth swim lessons Vancouver/Clark Firstenburg Community Center - $63.00 for 8, 30-minute

lessons

Page 24: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 20 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

14 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_29 - Revenue Miscellaneous Fees

This proposal increases the following minor fees:

City Nature Urban Forestry tree permit fees. PP&R parks usage for concessions, sports, picnics, weddings, community

gardens, special use, etc. Establishes a fee for PP&R review of development permits, similar to other

bureaus (Water, Fire, BES, PBOT) existing fees.

Capital BudgetBureau Summary

CIP Highlights PP&R has in excess of $984.3 million (replacement value, not including land value)of assets spread over 11,415 acres of park space. PP&R’s Capital ImprovementProgram, which builds upon City priorities, Parks 2020 Vision, and PP&R TotalAsset Management Plan, has two primary objectives: fixing the system bymaintaining what we have, and growing the system by providing recreationopportunities to all residents. PP&R does both of these as efficiently andsustainably as possible. Specifically, PP&R strives to do the following:

Protect and maintain those existing assets that provide desired levels of servicethrough maintenance, rehabilitation and renewal that extend the life of theasset.

Provide new service and expand capacity that accommodates growth andprovides equitable levels of service through the expansion of existing facilitiesand the construction of new parks and facilities.

Improve efficiency, environmental quality and energy conservation whereverpossible.

Major Issues PP&R continues to face several key challenges in relation to capital investment.These include:

Unmet Service Needs

There are parts of Portland where families and residents do not have ready accessto parks, recreation facilities, or open space. Along with deterioratinginfrastructure, this has been a citizen concern that is voiced regularly and wasthoroughly documented in the Parks 2020 Vision Plan. Providing new parks andrecreation facilities is difficult because the magnitude of the upfront investment toacquire or develop property but also due to the limited amount of operating andmaintenance resources available. PP&R has a service level goal from Vision 2020 toprovide a park or natural area within a half mile of every resident in Portland. In2011, PP&R met that service level goal for 79% of Portlanders.

Funding

As PP&R creatively seeks alternative funding sources to respond to priority needs,some types of projects are more readily funded than others. The systemdevelopment charge (SDC) and tax increment financing in urban renewal areas aregood sources of funding for land acquisition and project development. This isespecially true where population growth and capacity driven needs are the

14 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PK_29 - Revenue Miscellaneous Fees

This proposal increases the following minor fees:

City Nature Urban Forestry tree permit fees. PP&R parks usage for concessions, sports, picnics, weddings, community

gardens, special use, etc. Establishes a fee for PP&R review of development permits, similar to other

bureaus (Water, Fire, BES, PBOT) existing fees.

Capital BudgetBureau Summary

CIP Highlights PP&R has in excess of $984.3 million (replacement value, not including land value)of assets spread over 11,415 acres of park space. PP&R’s Capital ImprovementProgram, which builds upon City priorities, Parks 2020 Vision, and PP&R TotalAsset Management Plan, has two primary objectives: fixing the system bymaintaining what we have, and growing the system by providing recreationopportunities to all residents. PP&R does both of these as efficiently andsustainably as possible. Specifically, PP&R strives to do the following:

Protect and maintain those existing assets that provide desired levels of servicethrough maintenance, rehabilitation and renewal that extend the life of theasset.

Provide new service and expand capacity that accommodates growth andprovides equitable levels of service through the expansion of existing facilitiesand the construction of new parks and facilities.

Improve efficiency, environmental quality and energy conservation whereverpossible.

Major Issues PP&R continues to face several key challenges in relation to capital investment.These include:

Unmet Service Needs

There are parts of Portland where families and residents do not have ready accessto parks, recreation facilities, or open space. Along with deterioratinginfrastructure, this has been a citizen concern that is voiced regularly and wasthoroughly documented in the Parks 2020 Vision Plan. Providing new parks andrecreation facilities is difficult because the magnitude of the upfront investment toacquire or develop property but also due to the limited amount of operating andmaintenance resources available. PP&R has a service level goal from Vision 2020 toprovide a park or natural area within a half mile of every resident in Portland. In2011, PP&R met that service level goal for 79% of Portlanders.

Funding

As PP&R creatively seeks alternative funding sources to respond to priority needs,some types of projects are more readily funded than others. The systemdevelopment charge (SDC) and tax increment financing in urban renewal areas aregood sources of funding for land acquisition and project development. This isespecially true where population growth and capacity driven needs are the

Page 25: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 21

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 15

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

underlying premise to development. However, for most existing infrastructurethese types of resources are not available. Finding alternative solutions to fundmajor capital improvements for existing infrastructure as well as improvedongoing operations and maintenance are major challenges. However, options arebeing explored to meet these challenges.

PP&R has completed survey and research work for a potential bond measure, butpostponed the delivery of such a measure until the economy improves. It isanticipated that in 2013 more discussion and awareness of a bond measure willoccur. It is unknown at this time whether the public would support such a measure.

Aging Infrastructure

The park system dates back to 1860 and includes many heavily used facilities andactive open spaces. Aging infrastructure limits service levels in developed parks,community centers, and cultural facilities. Years of reduced investment anddeferred maintenance have further aged infrastructure and increased the fundinggap.

Certainty of Operating and Maintenance Funds

One of the greatest issues facing the Parks system is the increasing cost ofoperations and maintenance (O&M). A dependable, annual revenue stream forO&M is essential to maintain the existing infrastructure in the Portland’s parksystem. PP&R is dependent upon the Council's policy to approve on-going O&Mfunds in concert with approving park construction.

Changes from PriorYears

The following capital projects were completed during the past year:

Terrace Trails Parks Development (SDC). Frazier, NE Sumner, Furey, Ed Benedict and Claradon Community Gardens

(General Fund & Donations). E205 Projects Completed:

East Holladay Park play equipment East Portland Community Center play equipment Gilbert Primary Park paths Lynchwood Park paths Parklane Park play equipment GlenFair Park paths Ventura Park Pump Track

Peninsula Park Windows, Lighting Retrofits and Matt Dishman SolarInstallation (ARRA grants).

Harper's Playground at Arbor Lodge Park SW Tennis Court Resurfacing and Matt Dishman Lockers (Parks Operating).

Work continues on the following capital projects:

Maintenance Facility Improvements at Delta Park, and close out of ChimneyPark.

South Waterfront Greenway Trail. Pittock Mansion Balustrades.

16 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Thomas Cully Park Development.

Strategic Direction

Council Goals andPriorities

PP&R continues to develop its system plan, which will help the bureau meet theoverall vision laid out in the Parks Vision 2020 Plan. This includes providing a parkor open space within a half-mile walk of every residence, acquiring land and traileasements to close the gap within our regional trail system, and working to provideequity of access to recreational activities for all residents. Parks recently developedits 2012-2015 Strategic Plan, which will outline specific initiatives for the bureau toaccomplish in the next three years.

City ComprehensivePlan

PP&R's Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the existing CityComprehensive Plan directives. The City Comprehensive Plan addresses publicfacilities and directs PP&R to maximize the quality, safety, and usability ofparklands and facilities through the efficient operation and maintenance of parkimprovements, preservation of parks and open space, and equitable allocation ofactive and passive recreation opportunities for the citizens of Portland.

Improvements should be based on low, long-term maintenance costs, broadcommunity support, and located in deficient areas of the park system. They shouldsupport neighborhood stabilization and community development projects andpolicies, and be consistent with park master plans.

Criteria Capital projects are prioritized within the bureau’s twenty-year capitalimprovement program. Projects are rated through a capital project reviewcommittee which uses the Capital Project Review Criteria and Rating system. Thisrating system and criteria was created through a public process and is incorporatedin the PP&R Capital Planning Manual.

Each capital project request is reviewed with regard to the following criteria: legalcompliance, public support, conforms to City or Parks plans, improves level ofservice, addresses human health and safety, protects capital assets or facilities,improves environmental quality, effect of operating and maintenance costs andfinancing/business opportunities. Based upon the rating of each capital project, theranking for the five-year CIP plan is created for submission in the PP&R CapitalBudget.

Capital Planning & Budgeting

Capital PlanningProcess

PP&R receives requests for capital projects throughout the year fromneighborhoods, field staff, and other public agencies. Projects are developedthrough a variety of planning efforts, including neighborhood, district, master,management and site specific plans. Asset management, inventory and conditioninformation and staff technical knowledge also inform development of capitalproject requests. Because park development is integral to many other city planningefforts, PP&R staff coordinates projects with a variety of Citywide teams.

Page 26: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 22 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

16 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Thomas Cully Park Development.

Strategic Direction

Council Goals andPriorities

PP&R continues to develop its system plan, which will help the bureau meet theoverall vision laid out in the Parks Vision 2020 Plan. This includes providing a parkor open space within a half-mile walk of every residence, acquiring land and traileasements to close the gap within our regional trail system, and working to provideequity of access to recreational activities for all residents. Parks recently developedits 2012-2015 Strategic Plan, which will outline specific initiatives for the bureau toaccomplish in the next three years.

City ComprehensivePlan

PP&R's Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the existing CityComprehensive Plan directives. The City Comprehensive Plan addresses publicfacilities and directs PP&R to maximize the quality, safety, and usability ofparklands and facilities through the efficient operation and maintenance of parkimprovements, preservation of parks and open space, and equitable allocation ofactive and passive recreation opportunities for the citizens of Portland.

Improvements should be based on low, long-term maintenance costs, broadcommunity support, and located in deficient areas of the park system. They shouldsupport neighborhood stabilization and community development projects andpolicies, and be consistent with park master plans.

Criteria Capital projects are prioritized within the bureau’s twenty-year capitalimprovement program. Projects are rated through a capital project reviewcommittee which uses the Capital Project Review Criteria and Rating system. Thisrating system and criteria was created through a public process and is incorporatedin the PP&R Capital Planning Manual.

Each capital project request is reviewed with regard to the following criteria: legalcompliance, public support, conforms to City or Parks plans, improves level ofservice, addresses human health and safety, protects capital assets or facilities,improves environmental quality, effect of operating and maintenance costs andfinancing/business opportunities. Based upon the rating of each capital project, theranking for the five-year CIP plan is created for submission in the PP&R CapitalBudget.

Capital Planning & Budgeting

Capital PlanningProcess

PP&R receives requests for capital projects throughout the year fromneighborhoods, field staff, and other public agencies. Projects are developedthrough a variety of planning efforts, including neighborhood, district, master,management and site specific plans. Asset management, inventory and conditioninformation and staff technical knowledge also inform development of capitalproject requests. Because park development is integral to many other city planningefforts, PP&R staff coordinates projects with a variety of Citywide teams.

16 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Thomas Cully Park Development.

Strategic Direction

Council Goals andPriorities

PP&R continues to develop its system plan, which will help the bureau meet theoverall vision laid out in the Parks Vision 2020 Plan. This includes providing a parkor open space within a half-mile walk of every residence, acquiring land and traileasements to close the gap within our regional trail system, and working to provideequity of access to recreational activities for all residents. Parks recently developedits 2012-2015 Strategic Plan, which will outline specific initiatives for the bureau toaccomplish in the next three years.

City ComprehensivePlan

PP&R's Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the existing CityComprehensive Plan directives. The City Comprehensive Plan addresses publicfacilities and directs PP&R to maximize the quality, safety, and usability ofparklands and facilities through the efficient operation and maintenance of parkimprovements, preservation of parks and open space, and equitable allocation ofactive and passive recreation opportunities for the citizens of Portland.

Improvements should be based on low, long-term maintenance costs, broadcommunity support, and located in deficient areas of the park system. They shouldsupport neighborhood stabilization and community development projects andpolicies, and be consistent with park master plans.

Criteria Capital projects are prioritized within the bureau’s twenty-year capitalimprovement program. Projects are rated through a capital project reviewcommittee which uses the Capital Project Review Criteria and Rating system. Thisrating system and criteria was created through a public process and is incorporatedin the PP&R Capital Planning Manual.

Each capital project request is reviewed with regard to the following criteria: legalcompliance, public support, conforms to City or Parks plans, improves level ofservice, addresses human health and safety, protects capital assets or facilities,improves environmental quality, effect of operating and maintenance costs andfinancing/business opportunities. Based upon the rating of each capital project, theranking for the five-year CIP plan is created for submission in the PP&R CapitalBudget.

Capital Planning & Budgeting

Capital PlanningProcess

PP&R receives requests for capital projects throughout the year fromneighborhoods, field staff, and other public agencies. Projects are developedthrough a variety of planning efforts, including neighborhood, district, master,management and site specific plans. Asset management, inventory and conditioninformation and staff technical knowledge also inform development of capitalproject requests. Because park development is integral to many other city planningefforts, PP&R staff coordinates projects with a variety of Citywide teams.

Page 27: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 23

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 17

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Potential projects projects are compiled in a database and scored by aninterdepartmental team, using criteria that include public support, legal mandate,conformance to City or PP&R plans, public health and safety, environmentalquality, availability of funding, protection of assets, and effect on the operatingbudget. Selected projects are then prioritized into the five year capital forecast andthose that are proposed for the next fiscal year are reviewed by aninterdepartmental team.

The major challenge to PP&R's capital planning is the lack of consistent revenue aswell as urgent and unanticipated needs that can result from deferring maintenance.There have been improvements made to the capital planning process withimplementation of a five-year capital forecast, an asset management assessmentapproach, and an iterative process that includes open discussion of priorities withthe public.

FY 2014-18 - CIPFocus on MajorMaintenance

For FY 2014-2018 the CIP reflects an expanded emphasis on capital maintenance, toaddress ongoing major maintenance, large individual maintenance projects, systemwide improvement projects, property acquisitions and a focus towards equity ofaccess to our public, in areas not currently meeting our identified levels of services.It only reflects projects that are funded; no unfunded projects are presented inParks Five Year Capital Plan. Because the 5-year CIP only includes funded projects,it is a subset of the full five year forecast of all capital projects needed to maintainexisting assets.

Asset Managementand ReplacementPlans

PP&R continues to refine and implement its asset management practices approachby updating its current asset registry and integrating asset management intoBureau management practices. In 2012, PP&R restructured to assign dedicated staffto a new Asset Management group. The funding needed for capital maintenance tothe existing asset base over the five-year forecast, is over $229.5 million. Currently,the majority of these funds come from external sources or is unfunded. The currentannual allocation of discretionary General Fund resources is $1,043,202 or $5.4million over the five year period. PP&R continues to address its highest priorityconcerns with these funds. PP&R continues to look at other sources of funding thatcan address the current and predicted maintenance needs for existing assets.

Capital Programs & Projects

Program Description Projects within the capital program meet two primary objectives; maintaining thesystem and growing the system. Unfortunately, there is a fundamental imbalancebetween funds available to fix or maintain the system, which are few, and fundsavailable to grow the system, which are more plentiful. To act as a proper stewardof public resources and budget accordingly, PP&R attempts to balance the twoprimary objectives by only growing the system as resources are made available tosustain system maintenance over the long term. For maintenance and smallergrowth projects, PP&R requests and sets aside funds each year so that maintenanceand expansion needs can be adequately planned.

Page 28: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 24 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

18 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

PP&R categorizes projects into six program areas: Acquisitions; Buildings andPools; Developed Parks; Green Infrastructure; Recreation Features; Utilities, Roadsand Trails; and Enterprise. Each program area, except Acquisitions, includesmaintenance as well as growth-related projects. The $54.03 million, five yeardistribution of projects across program areas is as follows:

Acquisitions - $7.6 million or 14.21%. Building & Pools - $7.1 million or 13.12%. Developed Parks - $24.3 million or 45.01%. Green Infrastructure - $421 thousand or less than 1%. Enterprise - $4.7 million or less than 8.70%. Recreation Features - $4.1 million or 7.65%. Utilities, Roads and Trails - $5.7 million or 10.54%.

Funding Sources The diverse capital funding sources for PP&R for FY 2013-14 include:

Tax increment financing from the Portland Development Commission (PDC) -$1.7 million (9.60%).

General Fund (including carryover) - $3.6 million (19.96%). System Development Charges (SDC) - $10.7 million (58.60%) . Interagency (including Metro) funding - $900 thousand (4.92%). Donations and grants - $1.2 million (6.92%).

Major Projects Major Maintenance: Ongoing General is $913,202 which is before the 10% addpackage attributable to budgetary process for FY 2013-14. The total requested addpackage is $130,000.

Of this amount, over $166,000 will be used to repair the masonry wall at RockyButte. Another $96,558 will be used to make sidewalk repairs on the walkway atRiverplace. The remainder will be held for emergency projects, such as the sliderepair on the Springwater Trail on the Willamette. $333,000 is held to pay down theline of credit used to improve maintenance facilities in North Zone and a newfacility in the South Zone.

Buildings & Pools: Work continues on the maintenance facility at Delta Park. Thesoutheast maintenance facility was completed in the Fall of 2012. The PittockTerrace Balustrades project will be completed in FY 2013-14.

Green Infrastructure: The Natural Areas Acquisition Strategy provides for planningand ecosystem management with respect to land acquisition that will be fundedthrough the Metro 2006 Natural Areas Bond along with PP&R SystemDevelopment Charges (SDC's). The overall strategy is to link green infrastructurethroughout the parks system, which will include some land banking in the nearterm. Additionally, a flood mitigation project at Westmoreland Park has beendelayed to summer 2013.

Developed Parks: Major projects in this program include Dawson Park and ErrolHeights Park neighborhood park, as well as development projects such as Werbinproperty and Thomas Cully Park in the Cully neighborhood.

Page 29: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 25

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 19

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Recreation Features: The Portland Tennis Center ''Bubble'' project will enclose four ofthe eight outdoor courts, thus increasing public indoor use and revenue to fund theproject. PP&R will construct two new community gardens east of I-205, one atCentennial HS and the other at Oliver School. SDC will fund a new Splash Padplay feature at Fernhill Park. Work continues on the nature play project atWestmoreland Park.

Utilities, Roads, and Trails: Trail development along the South Waterfront Greenway,Waud Bluff, Marine Drive and Columbia Slough are the major projects in thiscategory. Metro funding will complete trail renovation and development atStephens Creek Natural Area and Marquam Nature Park. Parks SDC is fundingthe match to Chimney Park Trail Bridge grant which is being managed by Metro.SDC will also fund match for a grant for April Hill Park Trail, Marine Drive TrailGaps and Red Electric Trail.

Net Operating andMaintenance Costsor Savings

As new PP&R assets such as natural areas, playgrounds, trails and new parks, areplaced into service, PP&R will request resources to cover the operating andmaintenance costs through the Budget Monitoring Process, per City financialpolicy. This is necessary in order to ensure that new assets are able to be maintainedand are financially sustainable.

Page 30: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 26 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

20 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Recreation RecreationDescription The Recreation program provides an extensive range of programmed aquatic, arts,

and sports activities which are delivered at community centers, pools, parks, andSUN community schools. The Recreation program also provides education andsocialization opportunities that contribute to an enriched and healthful community.

Goals The Parks Strategic Plan articulates high level goals for the bureau to achieve overthe next three years. Goals most germane to service delivery in the Recreationprogram include:

Contribute to improved health outcomes for youth through increased physicalactivity and improved nutrition

Connect more youth to the outdoors, physical activity and their communities Improve the recreation service delivery model through coordinated

programming, integrated marketing, and supporting services

Performance Assessing progress towards desired outcomes will be measured throughperformance measures that monitor conditions in the field, public perception aboutcurrent conditions, and interventions by Parks that aim to improve conditions.Future year targets indicated below are not necessarily specific to FY 2013-14. Inmost cases, target values correspond to strategic goals articulated in the Parks 2020Vision, or the Parks Strategic Plan.

Changes to Servicesand Activities

The 90% base budget for Recreation programs would result in several significantreductions to service. Developed parks would be impacted for the second year in arow by further reducing support for Horticulture services. Three SUN schoolprograms currently operated by PP&R would be eliminated and a majorrestructuring of recreation programs would be implemented leading to a reductionin service levels. Funding for PP&R’s teen programs has been funded using one-time resources for several years. Without additional support, this program will beeliminated in FY 2013-14.

Changes noted above will lead to a notable decline in the number of residentsserved as well as an expected reduction in overall satisfaction levels.

FTE & Financials Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

FTE 137.60 128.93 127.70 113.53 125.53Expenditures

Aquatics 5,011,401 5,144,043 5,038,663 5,523,379 5,669,703Arts 2,202,307 2,667,631 1,893,002 2,223,762 2,223,762Community and Socialization 10,546,999 10,595,829 10,336,045 10,724,509 11,670,143Sports and Games 9,982,924 10,398,178 10,139,791 10,155,684 10,159,131

Total Expenditures 27,743,631 28,805,681 27,407,501 28,627,334 29,722,739

Page 31: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 27

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 21

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Performance Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Yr End Est.FY 2012-13

BaseFY 2013-14

TargetFY 2013-14

EffectivenessPercentage of residents rating the overall quality of parks as good or very good

85% 84% 80% 80% 90%

Percentage of residents rating the overall quality of recreation centers and activities as good or very good

77% 72% 75% 70% 78%

Total Golf Rounds Played 348,716 358,729 425,000 360,000 360,000Percentage of residents satisfied or very satisfied with the affordability of recreation programs

69% 68% 68% 65% 65%

Percentage of residents who rate the variety of recreation programs as good or very good

71% 69% 65% 69% 69%

EfficiencyTotal cost recovery rate for fee supported programs 33% 38% 38% 40% 39%

Workload P.I.R. Number of Use Days 500 595 500 595 595P.I.R. Attendance (est.) 250,000 281,300 250,000 280,000 280,000

Page 32: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 28 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

22 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Support SupportDescription The Support program includes services such as financial management, long range

planning, employee services, strategy, policy development, and performancemonitoring.

Goals The Parks Strategic Plan articulates high level goals for the bureau to achieve overthe next three years. The Support program provides services to all other programsand activities of Parks and is involved in progress towards all the outcomes of theParks Strategic Plan. Stated here are the outcome statements most germane toservices within the Support program. They include:

Strengthen management tools for developing and maintaining PP&R trails Extend ecologically sustainable landscape management practices over the

entire spectrum of PP&Rs green infrastructure Reduce consumption of water and energy resources systemwide

Performance Assessing progress towards desired outcomes will be measured through a varietyof performance measures that monitor conditions in the field, public perceptionabout current conditions, and interventions by Parks that aim to improveconditions. Future year targets that are indicated below are not necessarily specificto FY 2013-14. In most cases, target values correspond to strategic goals articulatedin the Parks 2020 Vision, or the Parks Strategic Plan.

Changes to Servicesand Activities

After several years of reductions the FY 2013-14 90% base budget assumes furtherreductions within the support program. Positions would be eliminated thatprovide support to the bureau’s safety, security and volunteer programs. Webcontent and digital marketing services would be reduced. Across the boardreductions would be realized as all departments will be asked to limit theirmaterials and services expenditures.

FTE & Financials Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

FTE 72.70 78.15 61.17 59.80 61.80Expenditures

Business Services 11,132,850 11,580,317 10,288,902 10,422,243 11,673,879Planning 1,158,795 1,082,764 1,054,134 926,347 926,347

Total Expenditures 12,291,645 12,663,081 11,343,036 11,348,590 12,600,226

Page 33: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 29

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 23

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Performance Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Yr End Est.FY 2012-13

BaseFY 2013-14

TargetFY 2013-14

EffectivenessPercentage of employees satisfied or very satisfied 70% 68% 76% 50% 80%Percentage of employees rating internal communication as good or very good

43% 47% 50% 50% 50%

Minority employees as a percentage of total 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%Female employees as a percentage of total 55% 54% 54% 54% 54%Annual greenhouse gas emissions 14,101 13,494 13,000 13,494 13,494

EfficiencyWorkers compensation claims per 100 workers 8.90 7.30 7.00 7.30 7.30

Page 34: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 30 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

24 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Infrastructure InfrastructureDescription The Infrastructure program includes all activities related to maintenance, capital

construction, and design of Parks facilities, structures, grounds, parks, and naturalareas. The Infrastructure program also includes all aspects of property acquisition,disposition, and management.

Goals The Parks Strategic Plan articulates high level goals for the bureau to achieve overthe next three years. Goals most germane to service delivery in the Infrastructureprogram include the following:

Provide equitable access to developed parks and natural areas within walkingdistance to all residents

Meet the demand for trails by closing the gaps in the trail network Improve the condition of PP&Rs built and natural assets by implementing an

asset management program Lower the system wide risk of assets failure to provide established levels of

service

Performance Assessing progress towards desired outcomes will be measured through a varietyof performance measures that monitor conditions in the field, public perceptionabout current conditions, and interventions by PP&R that aim to improveconditions. Future year targets are not necessarily specific to FY 2013-14. In mostcases, target values correspond to strategic goals articulated in the Parks 2020Vision, or the Parks strategic plan.

Changes to Servicesand Activities

90% base budget for PP&R Infrastructure programs will result in a substantialchange in service levels and will impair our ability to maintain assets. Facilitymaintenance would be negatively impacted by the loss of several positions. Inaddition, the loss of capital maintenance funding would affect our ability to dealwith a current $35.2 million annual maintenance funding gap. Within naturalareas, condition and habitat value would be compromised by the loss of fundingsupport from the Bureau of Environmental Services(BES). Progress towardspreserving the city’s urban forest would be limited by the loss of support for theDutch Elm disease program as well as the loss of BES funding currently supportingurban forestry programs. The base budget does not include funding to supportimplementation of the recent Tree Code updates passed by City Council.

The changes noted above would, over time, likely result in a decline in thecondition of PP&R’s facilities, parks and natural areas. Residents satisfaction levelswith the quality of parks and park facilities would likely decline.

FTE & Financials Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

FTE 205.40 201.65 194.33 180.00 199.00Expenditures

Capital Development 7,941,316 8,630,625 29,813,403 19,178,844 19,304,829Maintenance 22,029,239 23,958,654 26,178,825 24,470,305 26,994,113

Page 35: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 31

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 25

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Property 621,244 521,606 1,036,182 913,424 913,424Total Expenditures 30,591,799 33,110,885 57,028,410 44,562,573 47,212,366

Performance Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Yr End Est.FY 2012-13

BaseFY 2013-14

TargetFY 2013-14

EffectivenessPercentage of residents rating park grounds as well maintained 84% 84% 80% 70% 85%Percentage of residents rating park facilities as well maintained 68% 66% 65% 60% 67%Percentage of residents living within 3 miles of a full service community center

69% 69% 69% 69% 69%

Funding for facility maintenance as a percentage of current replacement value

1.5% 1.5% 2.0% 1.0% 1.5%

Percentage of residents living within 1/2 mile of a park or natural area

79% 79% 79% 79% 79%

Percentage of residents rating proximity to parks as good or very good

85% 83% 85% 85% 85%

Park acres per 1,000 residents 19.20 19.50 19.20 19.50 19.50Workload

Percentage of maintenance that is scheduled 58% 53% 50% 45% 52%Acres of invasive weeds treated annually 3,824 2,261 2,500 200 2,000Miles of Regional Trails 152 152 151 152 152Natural Areas Acreage 7,593 7,762 7,789 7,789 7,789

FTE & Financials Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

Page 36: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 32 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

26 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Community CommunityDescription The Community program includes services related to community engagement,

leadership, public safety, sponsorship, volunteers, and communications.

Goals The Parks Strategic Plan articulates high level goals for the bureau to achieve overthe next three years. Goals most germane to service delivery in the Communityprogram include the following:

Expand active recreation by partnering with the public health community Improve recreation opportunities for underserved communities

Performance Assessing progress towards desired outcomes will be measured through a varietyof performance measures that monitor conditions in the field, public perceptionabout current conditions, and interventions by Parks that aim to improveconditions. Future year targets are not necessarily specific to FY 2013-14. In mostcases, target values correspond to strategic goals articulated in the Parks 2020Vision, or the Parks Strategic Plan.

Changes to Servicesand Activities

The 90% base budget includes several changes from prior years. The largestchanges include a reduction of pass through funding that is sent to MultnomahCounty to support Aging and Disability service and SUN Community Schools.Pass through funding is slightly reduced for several partner groups including,Leach Botanical Garden, Linnton Community Center and Pioneer CourthouseSquare. Pass through funding noted above has no impact on services provideddirectly by PP&R, but will result in significant impact to the local community. TheCommunity program includes PP&R’s security function which will be impactedthe loss of funding for the Forest Park Ranger, previously funded by the Bureau ofEnvironmental Services.

FTE & Financials Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

FTE 29.90 36.40 37.23 30.75 34.75Expenditures

Community Engagement 2,616,196 3,351,533 2,915,442 1,572,518 2,726,409Leadership and Advocacy 716,566 583,201 573,999 602,837 602,837Marketing & Communications 272,282 525,371 508,466 526,170 526,170Visitor Services 1,824,312 1,980,163 2,646,641 2,731,524 2,803,524

Total Expenditures 5,429,356 6,440,268 6,644,548 5,433,049 6,658,940

Performance Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Yr End Est.FY 2012-13

BaseFY 2013-14

TargetFY 2013-14

EfficiencyAnnual volunteer hours 453,941 474,709 455,000 437,000 475,000

Workload Number of annual visits (recreation programs) 3,900,000 4,475,000 4,400,000 4,114,000 4,475,000

Page 37: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 33

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 27

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Performance Measures

Percent of Employees Satisfied or Very Satisfied

Employee satisfaction has improvedconsiderably since 2004. The bureau aims tomaintain employee satisfaction at 80% orgreater.

Perc

ent

Residents Rating Park Grounds as Well Maintained

Public satisfaction with the maintenance ofpark grounds reached its highest level everin 2009. The bureau's goal is to maintainsatisfaction levels above 85%.

Perc

ent

Quality of Parks

This measure reports the percentage ofresidents rating the quality of parks as goodor very good. Recent declines have beenminor. The goal is to reach 90% overallsatisfaction.

Perc

ent

Page 38: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 34 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation

28 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Quality of Recreation Centers and Activities

This measure reports residents' rating thequality of recreation centers and activities asvery good or good. Quality ranking forcommunity centers has significantlyimproved since the early nineties. Parks'goal is to reach 78% in the near future. Pe

rcen

tFunding Allocated to Facility Maintenance

Parks' goal is to allocate 2-4% of facilityreplacement value towards maintenance asidentified in the Parks 2020 Vision.

Perc

ent

Residents Living within 1/2 Mile of a Park

As of 2012, 79% of Portland households livedwithin 1/2 mile of a developed park ornatural area. The largest park deficient areasexist in the Outer East Portland and CentralNortheast neighborhood areas.

Perc

ent

Page 39: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 35

Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 29

Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Cost Recovery Rate

Parks' cost recovery policy was endorsed byCity Council in 2004 and includes an averagetotal cost recovery goal of 39% for all feesupported programs.

Perc

ent

Page 40: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 36 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation Summary of Bureau Budget

30 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and Recreation Summary of Bureau BudgetParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13 Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

ResourcesExternal RevenuesTaxes 87,630 11,789 16,071 1,922 1,922Licenses & Permits 280,067 778,554 278,502 405,133 431,028Charges for Services 27,225,384 31,641,303 32,541,619 33,574,028 34,078,043Intergovernmental 3,294,789 5,190,642 13,989,563 4,101,186 4,101,186Bond & Note 0 3,131,248 1,824,851 0 0Miscellaneous 2,139,759 2,243,748 3,044,909 2,566,421 2,566,421

Total External Revenues 33,027,629 42,997,284 51,695,515 40,648,690 41,178,600Internal RevenuesGeneral Fund Discretionary 41,146,358 43,031,199 41,333,012 40,422,741 45,959,210Fund Transfers - Revenue 5,035,489 3,432,523 1,317,754 1,216,446 1,342,431Interagency Revenue 2,806,943 2,846,884 3,624,528 2,183,453 2,183,453

Total Internal Revenues 48,988,790 49,310,606 46,275,294 43,822,640 49,485,094Beginning Fund Balance 17,013,891 16,967,822 24,168,436 12,666,579 12,666,579

Total Resources $99,030,310 $109,275,712 $122,139,245 $97,137,909 $103,330,273

RequirementsBureau ExpendituresPersonnel Services 44,721,035 47,109,150 45,978,579 46,273,921 49,277,474External Materials and Services 18,570,720 19,571,289 24,033,852 20,144,189 22,946,485Internal Materials and Services 9,199,265 9,519,428 9,197,938 8,850,710 9,267,586Capital Outlay 3,565,411 4,820,048 23,213,126 14,702,726 14,702,726

Total Bureau Expenditures 76,056,431 81,019,915 102,423,495 89,971,546 96,194,271Fund ExpendituresDebt Service 2,340,048 2,078,234 1,413,142 1,179,725 1,179,725Contingency 0 0 17,620,140 5,214,219 5,183,858Fund Transfers - Expense 3,666,009 2,160,639 519,708 609,629 609,629

Total Fund Expenditures 6,006,057 4,238,873 19,552,990 7,003,573 6,973,212Ending Fund Balance 16,967,822 24,016,924 162,760 162,790 162,790

Total Requirements $99,030,310 $109,275,712 $122,139,245 $97,137,909 $103,330,273ProgramsSupport 12,291,645 12,663,081 11,343,036 11,348,590 12,600,226Recreation 27,743,631 28,805,681 27,407,501 28,627,334 29,722,739Community 5,429,356 6,440,268 6,644,548 5,433,049 6,658,940Infrastructure 30,591,799 33,110,885 57,028,410 44,562,573 47,212,366

Total Programs 76,056,431 $81,019,915 $102,423,495 $89,971,546 $96,194,271

Page 41: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 37

CIP Summary Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 31

CIP Summary Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

This table summarizes project expenses by capital programs.

Bureau Capital Program Revised Requested Capital Plan Project Prior Years FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 5-Year Total

Acquisitions Indian Creek Acq and Stablization 117,296 0 585 0 0 0 0 585Metro Bond Local Share Natural

Area Acquisition457,320 92,756 90,000 0 0 0 0 90,000

SDC Acquisition Community Parks 0 2,664,669 826,721 0 0 0 0 826,721SDC Habitat Acquisiton 0 750,000 350,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,550,000SDC Neighborhood Park Acquisition 2,931,721 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,500,000SDC Trail Acquisition 0 466,420 260,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 800,000Total Acquisitions 3,506,337 4,473,845 2,027,306 1,435,000 1,435,000 1,435,000 1,435,000 7,767,306

Buildings & Pools Capital Equipment Reserve 198,000 298,389 99,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 495,000Chimney Park Remodel 109,054 368,361 0 0 0 0 0 0Deferred Maintenance - Small Roofs

Painting284,602 130,000 126,380 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 646,380

Delta Park Maintenance Facility 64,414 349,790 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000Flavel Property Development 1,856,206 1,560,099 0 0 0 0 0 0Major Maintenance 1,052,748 62,219 677,772 754,614 730,573 748,356 743,370 3,654,685Mt Tabor Facility 0 69,443 430,557 0 0 0 0 430,557Mt. Tabor Plant Production

Greenhouse0 50,846 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mt. Tabor Summit Restroom 0 0 0 161,000 0 0 0 161,000Pittock Terrace Replacement 79,439 670,560 560,000 0 0 0 0 560,000Sellwood Pool Lead 0 0 0 0 50,000 250,000 0 300,000Washington Monroe Community

Center617,592 65,875 0 0 0 985,000 0 985,000

Total Buildings & Pools 4,262,055 3,625,582 2,393,709 1,144,614 1,009,573 2,212,356 972,370 7,732,622

Developed Parks Dawson Park Improvements 341,294 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000E205 Ed Benedict Amenities 7,093 8,307 0 0 0 0 0 0Errol Heights Park Improvements 0 300,000 1,200,000 500,000 400,000 0 0 2,100,000Gilbert Hts-SE130TH 110,787 1,700 0 0 0 0 0 0Interstate Urban Renewal Capital

Projects2,025 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000

Ivon Park Improvement 86,372 13,204 0 0 0 0 0 0O' Bryant Square Development 0 0 0 0 1,600,220 0 0 1,600,220Parklane Park Development 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 4,000,000Pettygrove Park 11,964 32,296 36,000 0 0 0 0 36,000Raymond Park Entrance

Development23,657 166,813 0 0 0 0 0 0

River District Neighborhood Park 1,795,941 4,530,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 400,000Rocky Butte-Masonry 0 0 166,000 0 0 0 0 166,000SDC Citywide Component

Development489,439 0 250,000 700,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,950,000

Page 42: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 38 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation CIP Summary

32 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and Recreation CIP SummaryParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

SDC Neighborhood Park Development

1,907,000 1,961,802 0 0 540,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,540,000

South Waterfront Neighborhood Park

1,752,026 0 450,000 0 0 0 0 450,000

Thomas Cully Park Development Phase 2

1,947 498,053 925,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0 3,925,000

USS Oregon WWII Memorial Repair & Access Improvements

0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000

Waterfront Park Turf 138,977 193,023 68,650 0 0 0 0 68,650Werbin - Cully Park Development 0 500,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 1,900,000Willamette Park Improvement 73,482 581,400 582,335 0 0 0 0 582,335Total Developed Parks 6,742,004 9,336,598 6,527,985 3,700,000 6,540,220 4,500,000 3,050,000 24,318,205

Golf Rose City - Reline Lake 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000Total Golf 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000

Green Infrastructure Leach Botanical Garden Phase 3 0 0 100,000 1,243,000 0 0 0 1,343,000Riverview Property Restoration 0 0 130,000 120,000 0 0 0 250,000SDC Habitat Restoration 0 25,000 25,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000Westmoreland Duck Pond 29,727 271,380 256,380 0 0 0 0 256,380Total Green Infrastructure 29,727 296,380 511,380 1,373,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 1,914,380

Recreation Features Centennial Community Garden 0 0 56,700 0 0 0 0 56,700Delta Park Artificial Turf 0 500,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,500,000E205 East Holladay Playground

Development74,008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

E205 East Portland CC Playground 75,076 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Fernhill Splash Pad 0 455,473 455,473 0 0 0 0 455,473Harper's Playground - Arbor Lodge

Park65,853 70,146 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marshall Park Playground 0 0 25,000 200,000 0 0 0 225,000Mt Tabor Community Garden 897 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0Nike Basketball Courts Repair 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000Oliver Community Garden 0 0 56,700 0 0 0 0 56,700Portland Tennis Center Bubble 0 200,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 800,000Splash Pad Fesibility 8,852 1,148 0 0 0 0 0 0Sports Field Safety Improvements 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 130,000 130,000Walker Stadium Replace The Press

Box & Bleacher0 0 0 0 157,500 0 0 157,500

Westmoreland Park Playground Relocation

91,912 446,123 342,200 0 0 0 0 342,200

Total Recreation Features 316,597 1,787,890 3,286,073 200,000 157,500 0 130,000 3,773,573

This table summarizes project expenses by capital programs.

Bureau Capital Program Revised Requested Capital Plan Project Prior Years FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 5-Year Total

Page 43: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 39

CIP Summary Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 33

CIP Summary Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Utilities, Roads & Trails 3 Bridges McLoughlin Staircase 20,640 181,491 170,000 0 0 0 0 170,000April Hill Park Trail Match 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000Chimney Park Bridge North

Willamette Trail59,687 208,945 65,500 0 0 0 0 65,500

Columbia Slough Trail - PIR to MLK 45,653 563,364 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000Columbia Slough Trail Head 12,595 80,617 80,617 0 0 0 0 80,617E205 Lynchwood Park - Path &

Amenities5,954 74,826 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ed Benedict Skate Plaza Safety Barrier Cable

0 43,200 0 0 0 0 0 0

Forest Park Culverts 79,598 128,048 0 0 0 0 0 0Marine Drive Trail Gaps 14,215 365,500 105,500 0 0 0 0 105,500Marine Drive Trail, Bridgeton Rd to

Levee91,416 700,000 828,000 0 0 0 0 828,000

Marquam Natural Area Trail 212,584 537,416 390,000 0 0 0 0 390,000Mt Tabor Reservoir Loop Road

Repair0 0 0 0 0 0 117,000 117,000

N Portland Greenway Trail Design 36,546 179,709 0 0 0 0 0 0Oaks Bottom Trail Development 244,218 505,782 0 0 0 0 0 0Red Electric Trail Match - PBOT 0 176,247 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000Repave NW 53rd - Forest Park 0 0 0 0 0 90,000 0 90,000Riverplace Sidewalk Renovation 0 0 193,116 0 0 0 0 193,116SDC Trail Development 0 0 220,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,420,000South Waterfront Greenway Central

Trail936,886 3,752,025 0 0 0 0 0 0

South Waterfront Greenway Central Trail - Grant

0 1,000,000 432,877 0 0 0 0 432,877

South Waterfront Greenway Central Trail - SDC

1,908,431 1,320,040 320,000 0 0 0 0 320,000

Springwater on the Willamette Slide Repair

4,690 770,310 400,000 0 0 0 0 400,000

Springwater-Sellwood Gap Trail 42,010 30,000 67,990 0 0 0 0 67,990Stephens Creek NA Trail

Restoration67,649 57,351 54,500 0 0 0 0 54,500

Swan Island Waud Bluff Trail 1,135,732 1,393,318 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000Ventura Park New Irrigation System 0 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 130,000Washington Park Parking Meters 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0Washington Park Pathway Gutters 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 70,000Willamette Park Boat Ramp

Dredging & Repair72,661 43,425 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Utilities, Roads & Trails 4,991,165 12,611,614 3,928,100 430,000 300,000 390,000 487,000 5,535,100Total Requirements 19,847,885 32,131,909 18,699,553 8,282,614 9,452,293 8,547,356 6,084,370 51,066,186

This table summarizes project expenses by capital programs.

Bureau Capital Program Revised Requested Capital Plan Project Prior Years FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 5-Year Total

Page 44: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 40 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation FTE Summary

34 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and Recreation FTE SummaryParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Salary Range Revised

FY 2012-13 Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

Class Title Minimum Maximum No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount30000062 Accountant I 39,312 56,514 1.00 53,407 1.00 56,520 1.00 56,52030000063 Accountant II 51,397 64,688 2.00 126,792 2.00 129,384 2.00 129,38430000061 Accounting Technician 32,552 46,758 1.00 46,764 1.00 46,764 1.00 46,76430000434 Administrative Assistant 45,074 69,451 1.00 73,128 1.00 75,336 1.00 75,33630000433 Administrative Specialist, Sr 41,974 64,626 2.00 111,372 2.00 116,548 3.00 171,95230000436 Administrative Supervisor I 54,725 72,925 1.00 54,876 1.00 57,304 1.00 57,30430000437 Administrative Supervisor II 57,450 76,586 1.00 76,800 1.00 79,116 1.00 79,11630000753 Aquatic Program Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 80,700 1.00 83,136 1.00 83,13630001737 Arborist I 45,282 48,672 2.00 87,922 1.00 46,692 2.00 91,98030001738 Arborist II 45,989 52,541 3.00 133,949 3.00 147,149 3.00 147,14930000248 Arborist III 52,125 59,301 7.00 401,856 7.00 415,128 7.00 415,12830001739 Arborist IV 55,390 62,691 1.00 55,392 1.00 55,392 1.00 55,39230000749 Arts Programs Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 71,040 1.00 75,426 1.00 75,42630000101 Automotive Equipment Oper I 42,182 51,126 6.00 288,276 5.00 255,660 6.00 297,84030001584 Botanic Spec I-Community Gardens 53,019 67,683 1.00 55,254 1.00 59,922 1.00 59,92230000315 Botanic Spec I-Generalist 53,019 67,683 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 61,21230001333 Botanic Spec I-Trails 53,019 67,683 1.00 65,520 1.00 67,680 1.00 67,68030000316 Botanic Spec I-Youth & Comnty Programs 53,019 67,683 2.00 107,928 2.00 115,216 2.00 115,21630000317 Botanic Spec II-Arboretum Collection 55,827 71,198 1.00 68,928 1.00 71,196 1.00 71,19630000319 Botanic Spec II-Environmental Education 55,827 71,198 1.00 54,036 1.00 55,824 1.00 55,82430001005 Botanic Spec II-Forestry 55,827 71,198 1.00 62,520 1.00 67,284 1.00 67,28430000320 Botanic Spec II-Generalist 55,827 71,198 1.00 67,024 0.00 0 1.00 71,19630000321 Botanic Spec II-Ntrl Resource Ecologist 55,827 71,198 4.00 269,184 4.00 283,660 5.00 351,66430000322 Botanic Spec II-Pest Mgmt 55,827 71,198 1.00 68,928 1.00 71,196 1.00 71,19630000323 Botanic Spec II-Rose Garden 55,827 71,198 1.00 68,928 1.00 71,196 1.00 71,19630000831 Botanic Technician I 39,083 52,354 4.00 162,014 1.00 39,084 4.00 173,49630001383 Botanic Technician II 42,994 57,595 2.00 98,748 2.00 105,805 2.00 105,80530000458 Bureau Director, Assistant to 75,109 100,048 1.00 118,368 1.00 121,932 1.00 121,93230000441 Business Operations Manager 75,109 100,048 1.00 93,564 1.00 97,704 1.00 97,70430000440 Business Operations Supervisor 66,602 89,107 1.00 66,792 1.00 68,796 1.00 68,79630000447 Business Systems Analyst, Assistant 45,074 69,451 1.00 54,612 1.00 57,408 1.00 57,40830000449 Business Systems Analyst, Sr 63,378 84,635 1.00 77,700 1.00 80,313 1.00 80,31330000329 CAD Technician II 52,354 66,810 1.00 64,668 1.00 66,816 1.00 66,81630000330 CAD Technician III 63,606 81,245 1.00 78,648 1.00 81,240 1.00 81,24030000686 Capital Project Manager II 66,602 89,107 2.00 158,880 2.00 168,699 2.00 168,69930000687 Capital Project Manager III 69,826 93,829 2.00 188,184 2.00 193,848 2.00 193,84830000110 Carpenter 53,144 59,467 8.00 449,606 7.00 406,481 8.00 459,62930000491 Community Outreach & Informtn Assistant 45,074 69,451 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 48,09630000492 Community Outreach & Informtn Rep 54,725 72,925 1.00 62,904 1.00 66,126 1.00 66,12630000493 Community Outreach & Informtn Rep, Sr 60,341 80,475 1.00 78,684 1.00 81,222 1.00 81,22230000494 Community Outreach & Invlvmt Program Mgr 63,378 84,635 1.00 84,492 1.00 87,399 1.00 87,39930000105 Construction Equipment Operator 44,907 57,346 2.00 111,024 2.00 114,696 2.00 114,69630000116 Electrician 66,498 71,781 2.00 138,984 2.00 143,568 2.00 143,56830000119 Electrician, Supervising 73,320 79,144 1.00 76,608 1.00 79,140 1.00 79,14030000358 Engineering Associate, Sr-Civil 72,301 92,186 1.00 89,232 1.00 92,184 1.00 92,18430000353 Engineering Associate-Civil 59,426 79,643 1.00 73,428 1.00 78,376 1.00 78,37630000720 Facilities Construction Proj Spec,Supvsg 66,602 89,107 1.00 85,248 1.00 90,216 1.00 90,21630000717 Facilities Construction Project Spec 54,725 72,925 1.00 73,128 1.00 75,336 1.00 75,33630000714 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor, Sr 60,341 80,475 1.00 62,616 1.00 67,152 1.00 67,15230000070 Facilities Maintenance Tech Apprentice 37,606 59,550 1.00 57,660 1.00 59,556 1.00 59,556

Page 45: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 41

FTE Summary Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 35

FTE Summary Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

30000071 Facilities Maintenance Technician 58,032 62,691 6.00 355,152 6.00 369,144 6.00 369,14430000567 Financial Analyst 57,450 76,586 1.00 76,044 1.00 78,466 1.00 78,46630000566 Financial Analyst, Assistant 45,074 69,451 2.00 120,144 2.00 124,122 2.00 124,12230000568 Financial Analyst, Sr 63,378 84,635 1.00 83,868 1.00 86,830 1.00 86,83030000127 General Mechanic 48,235 60,091 1.00 60,096 1.00 60,096 1.00 60,09630000343 GIS Technician III 63,606 81,245 1.00 78,648 1.00 81,240 1.00 81,24030000764 Golf Course Superintendent 60,341 80,475 4.00 306,072 4.00 316,878 4.00 316,87830000765 Golf, Director of 69,826 93,829 1.00 94,092 1.00 96,924 1.00 96,92430000085 Greenskeeper I 40,830 49,982 14.00 677,376 14.00 699,720 14.00 699,72030000086 Greenskeeper II 45,989 52,541 5.00 254,280 5.00 262,680 5.00 262,68030000087 Greenskeeper III 47,694 57,741 5.00 279,480 5.00 288,720 5.00 288,72030001334 Horticultural Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 65,208 1.00 67,854 1.00 67,85430000252 Horticulturist 45,406 54,850 21.00 1,115,100 17.00 932,484 21.00 1,151,89230000930 Landscape Architect Project Manager 69,826 93,829 1.00 94,092 1.00 96,924 1.00 96,92430000098 Maintenance Mechanic 47,694 53,331 11.00 567,864 11.00 586,608 11.00 586,60830000073 Maintenance Worker 24,482 29,016 2.00 56,160 2.00 58,032 2.00 58,03230000451 Management Analyst 57,450 76,586 1.00 76,212 1.00 78,616 1.00 78,61630000453 Management Analyst, Principal 75,109 100,048 1.00 100,332 1.00 103,344 1.00 103,34430000452 Management Analyst, Sr 63,378 84,635 1.00 84,876 1.00 87,432 1.00 87,43230000450 Management Assistant 45,074 69,451 2.90 192,552 2.90 200,874 2.90 200,87430000750 Music Programs Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 80,700 1.00 83,136 1.00 83,13630000768 Natural Areas Supervisor 60,341 80,475 2.00 151,968 2.00 159,564 2.00 159,56430000012 Office Support Specialist II 32,552 46,758 4.00 178,632 4.00 187,056 4.00 187,05630000013 Office Support Specialist III 41,642 55,203 4.00 215,300 4.00 220,800 4.00 220,80030000112 Painter 53,144 59,467 3.00 167,706 2.00 118,944 3.00 172,09230000757 Park Ranger Supervisor 45,074 69,451 1.00 45,204 1.00 48,468 1.00 48,46830000439 Parks & Rec Administrative Mgr 69,826 93,829 1.00 94,092 1.00 96,924 1.00 96,92430001585 Parks & Rec Asset Manager 86,840 117,686 1.00 105,288 1.00 108,838 1.00 108,83830000834 Parks & Rec Central Svcs Mgr 75,109 100,048 1.00 84,648 1.00 90,172 1.00 90,17230000756 Parks & Rec City Nature Zone Mgr 66,602 89,107 2.00 165,660 2.00 172,995 2.00 172,99530000746 Parks & Rec Natural Areas Manager 86,840 117,686 1.00 100,572 1.00 106,794 1.00 106,79430000748 Parks & Rec Services Manager 93,288 130,291 1.00 130,656 1.00 134,592 1.00 134,59230000755 Parks & Rec Zone Manager 69,826 93,829 4.00 354,840 4.00 368,770 4.00 368,77030000428 Parks & Recreation Director 115,398 165,381 1.00 145,428 1.00 154,407 1.00 154,40730000084 Parks Maintenance Crew Leader 47,653 57,574 4.00 210,204 4.00 219,292 4.00 219,29230000759 Parks Maintenance Supervisor 57,450 76,586 5.00 358,260 5.00 371,554 5.00 371,55430001685 Parks Maintenance Supervisor II 60,341 80,475 1.00 60,504 1.00 62,967 1.00 62,96730000742 Parks Planner, Supervising 75,109 100,048 1.00 100,332 1.00 103,344 1.00 103,34430001733 Parks Property & Business Devel Mgr 69,826 93,829 1.00 89,124 1.00 93,998 1.00 93,99830000758 Parks Security Manager 63,378 84,635 1.00 81,852 1.00 86,132 1.00 86,13230000081 Parks Technician 43,971 49,982 30.00 1,445,688 30.00 1,495,284 30.00 1,495,28430000761 Parks Turf & Irrigation Maint Supervisor 57,450 76,586 1.00 76,800 1.00 79,116 1.00 79,11630000386 Planner II. City-Parks 61,214 70,720 1.00 63,156 1.00 68,420 1.00 68,42030000392 Planner, Sr City-Environmental 63,606 81,245 1.00 78,648 1.00 81,240 1.00 81,24030000464 Program Coordinator 60,341 80,475 2.00 123,144 2.00 127,292 2.00 127,29230000465 Program Manager 63,378 84,635 3.00 208,608 3.00 217,922 3.00 217,92230000463 Program Specialist 54,725 72,925 6.00 364,968 6.00 378,427 6.00 378,42730000462 Program Specialist, Assistant 45,074 69,451 1.00 65,388 0.00 0 1.00 71,00430000497 Public Information Manager 69,826 93,829 1.00 94,092 1.00 96,924 1.00 96,92430000766 Raceway Maintenance Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 80,700 1.00 83,136 1.00 83,136

Salary Range Revised

FY 2012-13 Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

Class Title Minimum Maximum No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount

Page 46: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 42 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Portland Parks & Recreation FTE Summary

36 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Portland Parks and Recreation FTE SummaryParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

30000767 Raceway Manager 69,826 93,829 1.00 94,092 1.00 96,924 1.00 96,92430000268 Recreation Coord I-Aquatics 41,954 51,438 9.00 438,372 9.00 456,570 9.00 456,57030000269 Recreation Coord I-At-Risk Yth Outreach 41,954 51,438 2.00 99,600 2.00 102,888 2.00 102,88830000281 Recreation Coord I-Custmr Svc Supp/Trg 41,954 51,438 2.00 92,868 2.00 99,460 2.00 99,46030000273 Recreation Coord I-Disabled Citizens 41,954 51,438 2.00 99,600 2.00 102,888 2.00 102,88830000274 Recreation Coord I-Environmental Educ 41,954 51,438 2.00 99,600 2.00 102,888 3.00 154,33230000276 Recreation Coord I-Generalist 41,954 51,438 31.00 1,521,133 24.75 1,259,837 34.75 1,753,61330000278 Recreation Coord I-Multnomah Art Center 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 1.00 51,444 1.00 51,44430000275 Recreation Coord I-Public Events Permit 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 1.00 51,444 1.00 51,44430000280 Recreation Coord I-Senior Recreation 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 0.25 12,861 0.25 12,86130000282 Recreation Coord I-Tennis 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 1.00 51,444 1.00 51,44430001508 Recreation Coord I-Urban Parks 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 1.00 51,444 1.00 51,44430000284 Recreation Coord II-Aquatics 44,533 54,808 4.00 212,256 4.00 219,216 4.00 219,21630000285 Recreation Coord II-Comnty Music Center 44,533 54,808 1.00 53,064 1.00 54,804 1.00 54,80430000288 Recreation Coord II-Fitness 44,533 54,808 1.00 53,064 1.00 54,804 1.00 54,80430000289 Recreation Coord II-Generalist 44,533 54,808 4.00 212,256 6.00 328,824 6.00 328,82430000290 Recreation Coord II-Multnomah Art Center 44,533 54,808 1.00 53,064 1.00 54,804 1.00 54,80430000287 Recreation Coord II-Public Events Permit 44,533 54,808 1.00 53,064 1.00 54,804 1.00 54,80430000256 Recreation Leader-FT-Aquatics 29,515 42,619 2.00 79,452 1.00 42,624 2.00 84,19230000257 Recreation Leader-FT-Comnty Music Center 29,515 42,619 1.00 41,268 1.00 42,624 1.00 42,62430000258 Recreation Leader-FT-Custmr Svc Ctr Rep 29,515 42,619 2.00 82,536 2.00 85,248 2.00 85,24830000259 Recreation Leader-FT-Disabled Citizens 29,515 42,619 1.00 41,268 0.25 10,656 0.25 10,65630000262 Recreation Leader-FT-Pre-School 29,515 42,619 2.00 57,168 2.00 59,040 2.00 59,04030000266 Recreation Leader-FT-Senior Recreation 29,515 42,619 2.00 69,852 0.25 10,656 0.25 10,65630000267 Recreation Leader-FT-Tennis 29,515 42,619 1.00 38,184 1.00 41,832 1.00 41,83230000744 Recreation Supervisor I 57,450 76,586 10.00 726,408 9.00 673,470 10.00 755,20230000350 Right of Way Agent III 63,606 81,245 1.00 78,648 1.00 81,240 1.00 81,24030000485 Safety & Risk Officer I 63,378 84,635 1.00 84,876 1.00 87,432 1.00 87,43230000754 Senior Recreation Program Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 80,700 0.00 0 0.00 030000928 Sports Management Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 80,700 1.00 83,136 1.00 83,13630000054 Storekeeper/Acquisition Specialist II 44,554 54,475 1.00 52,728 1.00 54,480 1.00 54,48030000056 Storekeeper/Acquisition Specialist III 50,315 62,566 1.00 60,576 1.00 62,568 1.00 62,56830001030 SUN Community Schools Rec Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 84,180 1.00 86,724 1.00 86,72430001029 Therapeutic Rec & Inclusion Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 65,604 0.00 0 0.00 030000250 Tree Inspector 52,686 65,208 9.00 558,320 9.00 574,356 10.00 627,04830000080 Turf Maintenance Technician 40,830 49,982 15.25 728,460 17.00 831,372 18.00 872,20830000763 Urban Forestry Supervisor 60,341 80,475 1.00 64,788 1.00 69,468 1.00 69,46830000076 Utility Worker I 41,621 45,282 11.00 482,064 11.00 498,168 11.00 498,16830000077 Utility Worker II 45,282 48,672 13.00 602,592 10.00 486,720 12.00 577,29630000499 Volunteer Program Coordinator 57,450 76,586 1.00 76,800 1.00 79,116 1.00 79,11630000123 Welder 53,144 59,467 1.00 59,472 1.00 59,472 1.00 59,472

TOTAL FULL-TIME POSITIONS 399.15 23,043,803 373.40 22,547,072 407.40 24,322,19630000433 Administrative Specialist, Sr 41,974 64,626 0.88 51,708 0.00 0 0.00 030000386 Planner II. City-Parks 61,214 70,720 0.90 57,061 0.90 61,835 0.90 61,83530000263 Recreation Leader-FT-Pottery 29,515 42,619 0.90 37,140 0.90 38,352 0.90 38,35230000262 Recreation Leader-FT-Pre-School 29,515 42,619 1.80 74,280 1.80 76,704 1.80 76,704

TOTAL PART-TIME POSITIONS 4.48 220,189 3.60 176,891 3.60 176,89130000433 Administrative Specialist, Sr 41,974 64,626 1.00 45,204 1.00 46,560 1.00 46,56030000315 Botanic Spec I-Generalist 53,019 67,683 1.00 62,660 0.00 0 0.00 030000831 Botanic Technician I 39,083 52,354 1.00 37,836 0.50 19,703 0.50 19,703

Salary Range Revised

FY 2012-13 Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

Class Title Minimum Maximum No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount

Page 47: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 43

FTE Summary Portland Parks & Recreation

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 37

FTE Summary Portland Parks and RecreationParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

30000399 Capital Project Manager I 63,606 81,245 0.83 53,350 0.00 0 0.00 030000686 Capital Project Manager II 66,602 89,107 1.00 71,892 0.50 40,644 0.50 40,64430000491 Community Outreach & Informtn Assistant 45,074 69,451 1.00 45,204 0.00 0 0.00 030000717 Facilities Construction Project Spec 54,725 72,925 0.58 32,011 0.00 0 0.00 030001709 Park Ranger 34,154 48,880 3.00 105,000 3.00 113,215 3.00 113,21530000386 Planner II. City-Parks 61,214 70,720 0.67 39,504 0.50 30,606 0.50 30,60630000269 Recreation Coord I-At-Risk Yth Outreach 41,954 51,438 1.90 87,740 0.00 0 2.00 86,18430000274 Recreation Coord I-Environmental Educ 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 0.00 0 0.00 030000278 Recreation Coord I-Multnomah Art Center 41,954 51,438 1.00 49,800 0.33 17,148 0.33 17,14830000979 Recreation Coord II-At-Risk Yth Outreach 44,533 54,808 1.00 51,921 0.00 0 1.00 50,02830000258 Recreation Leader-FT-Custmr Svc Ctr Rep 29,515 42,619 0.83 25,408 1.00 36,140 1.00 36,14030000267 Recreation Leader-FT-Tennis 29,515 42,619 1.00 34,168 0.25 9,120 0.25 9,120

TOTAL LIMITED TERM POSITIONS 16.81 791,498 7.08 313,136 10.08 449,348GRAND TOTAL 420.44 24,055,490 384.08 23,037,099 421.08 24,948,435

Salary Range Revised

FY 2012-13 Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

Class Title Minimum Maximum No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount

Page 48: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 44 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Parks Local Option Levy FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Parks Local Option Levy Fund

Fund Overview

The Parks Local Option Levy Fund was established following voter approval of theParks Local Option Levy in November 2002. The purpose of the levy was to restore$2.2 million in funding reductions made in FY 2002-03; provide access torecreational programs for children, families, and seniors; provide safe places toplay; and restore, renovate, and continue to maintain the park system.

Resources in this fund are derived from property tax revenues and interestearnings. Fund requirements include costs associated with Portland Parks &Recreation programs and services.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Levy Funded Projects The levy expired June 30, 2008, but due to favorable interest rates, tax collectionsand delays in capital improvements, the ending fund balance allowed for anadditional year of program funding. Since then, Council has allocated $5.4 millionof ongoing General Fund resources to backfill the funding that had been providedby the levy. Levy funds support the operations and maintenance of levy-fundedcapital improvements for five years from the date the assets are placed into service.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesTaxes 87,630 11,789 16,071 1,922 1,922Miscellaneous 34,435 24,328 8,926 8,099 8,099

Total External Revenues 122,065 36,117 24,997 10,021 10,021Fund Transfers - Revenue 0 0 4,862 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 0 0 4,862 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 6,074,282 4,317,897 2,955,985 2,137,993 2,137,993

Total Resources 6,196,347 4,354,014 2,985,844 2,148,014 2,148,014Requirements

Personnel Services 420,755 394,304 318,419 132,632 132,632Internal Materials and Services 491,940 562,764 460,632 209,269 209,778

Total Bureau Expenditures 912,695 957,068 779,051 341,901 342,410Contingency 0 0 2,206,793 1,803,009 1,802,500Fund Transfers - Expense 965,755 502,402 0 3,104 3,104

Total Fund Expenditures 965,755 502,402 2,206,793 1,806,113 1,805,604Ending Fund Balance 4,317,897 2,894,544 0 0 0

Total Requirements 6,196,347 4,354,014 2,985,844 2,148,014 2,148,014

Parks Local Option Levy Fund Fund Summary

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland Parks Memorial Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland Parks Memorial Fund was established to receive proceeds fromgrants as well as donations from foundations, friends' organizations, neighborhoodassociations, and other entities. These funds often have restrictions related topurpose and the time to use such funds.

Fund Requirements Resources within this fund are typically used for one-time expenditures for specificimprovements or services. Individual grants or donations are managed in separateaccounts within the fund, according to the provisions of the contract, grant, ordonor agreement.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Parks set up a sub-fund to accept donations specifically addressed to the Children’sArboretum. This came in response to the memorial wishes of Dick Towle’s family.

Parks is also in the process of setting up a special revenue sub-fund for thecollection of parking revenues at Washington Park, earmarked for futureimprovements at the park.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 58,882 270,400 40,000 40,000 40,000Charges for Services 90,559 79,163 31,402 74,500 74,500Miscellaneous 738,871 643,267 644,347 661,140 661,140

Total External Revenues 888,312 992,830 715,749 775,640 775,640Fund Transfers - Revenue 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200

Total Internal Revenues 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200Beginning Fund Balance 2,180,257 2,114,468 2,108,538 2,636,512 2,636,512

Total Resources 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352Requirements

Personnel Services 453,951 258,366 558,898 523,537 523,537External Materials and Services 414,286 168,598 1,033,781 1,124,201 1,124,201Internal Materials and Services 108,064 510,696 672,563 475,171 475,171Capital Outlay 0 0 962 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 976,301 937,660 2,266,204 2,122,909 2,122,909Contingency 0 0 650,889 1,275,443 1,275,443Fund Transfers - Expense 25,000 93,212 0 50,000 50,000

Total Fund Expenditures 25,000 93,212 650,889 1,325,443 1,325,443Ending Fund Balance 2,114,468 2,133,531 0 0 0

Total Requirements 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352

Page 49: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 45

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial Fund

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland Parks Memorial Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland Parks Memorial Fund was established to receive proceeds fromgrants as well as donations from foundations, friends' organizations, neighborhoodassociations, and other entities. These funds often have restrictions related topurpose and the time to use such funds.

Fund Requirements Resources within this fund are typically used for one-time expenditures for specificimprovements or services. Individual grants or donations are managed in separateaccounts within the fund, according to the provisions of the contract, grant, ordonor agreement.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Parks set up a sub-fund to accept donations specifically addressed to the Children’sArboretum. This came in response to the memorial wishes of Dick Towle’s family.

Parks is also in the process of setting up a special revenue sub-fund for thecollection of parking revenues at Washington Park, earmarked for futureimprovements at the park.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 58,882 270,400 40,000 40,000 40,000Charges for Services 90,559 79,163 31,402 74,500 74,500Miscellaneous 738,871 643,267 644,347 661,140 661,140

Total External Revenues 888,312 992,830 715,749 775,640 775,640Fund Transfers - Revenue 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200

Total Internal Revenues 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200Beginning Fund Balance 2,180,257 2,114,468 2,108,538 2,636,512 2,636,512

Total Resources 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352Requirements

Personnel Services 453,951 258,366 558,898 523,537 523,537External Materials and Services 414,286 168,598 1,033,781 1,124,201 1,124,201Internal Materials and Services 108,064 510,696 672,563 475,171 475,171Capital Outlay 0 0 962 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 976,301 937,660 2,266,204 2,122,909 2,122,909Contingency 0 0 650,889 1,275,443 1,275,443Fund Transfers - Expense 25,000 93,212 0 50,000 50,000

Total Fund Expenditures 25,000 93,212 650,889 1,325,443 1,325,443Ending Fund Balance 2,114,468 2,133,531 0 0 0

Total Requirements 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352

Page 50: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 46 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund Fund Summary

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Parks Capital Improvement Program FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund

Fund Overview

The Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund accounts for all capital resourcesand requirements for Portland Parks & Recreation with the exception of capitalactivity relating to two enterprise funds, the Golf Fund and the PortlandInternational Raceway Fund.

Revenue Sources The primary sources of revenue to the Parks Capital Improvement Program Fundinclude service charges and fees from the System Development Charges (SDC)program, Metro Bond local match, General Fund discretionary, local, state &federal grants., and the Portland Development Commission.

Project Selection andPrioritization

Capital projects are first prioritized within the bureau's five-year CapitalImprovement Plan (CIP). Projects prioritized in the first year of the CIP areconsidered in the annual budget process for ranking by the bureau's CIP committeewith regard to scope, priority, funding, safety, code compliance, and communityimportance.

Three primary objectives guide project selection and prioritization:

1. Acquire land, including natural areas, and construct facilities in park deficient areas;2. Address capital repairs and replacement to preserve existing infrastructure; and

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 0 250,000 0 0 0Charges for Services 4,373,618 7,337,429 8,514,264 8,080,184 8,080,184Intergovernmental 1,857,583 3,023,336 10,776,920 2,601,465 2,601,465Bond & Note 0 3,131,248 1,824,851 0 0Miscellaneous 786,729 876,785 1,459,569 982,524 982,524

Total External Revenues 7,017,930 14,618,798 22,575,604 11,664,173 11,664,173Fund Transfers - Revenue 3,748,293 2,460,718 1,218,778 1,180,246 1,306,231Interagency Revenue 25,473 37,387 0 24,826 24,826

Total Internal Revenues 3,773,766 2,498,105 1,218,778 1,205,072 1,331,057Beginning Fund Balance 6,052,140 8,399,994 17,423,241 5,915,487 5,915,487

Total Resources 16,843,836 25,516,897 41,217,623 18,784,732 18,910,717Requirements

Personnel Services 1,228,229 1,460,855 1,344,621 1,453,361 1,453,361External Materials and Services 1,756,380 2,091,139 3,978,212 2,063,103 2,189,088Internal Materials and Services 640,800 665,082 626,580 510,230 520,072Capital Outlay 2,394,739 3,347,967 20,958,920 13,641,275 13,641,275

Total Bureau Expenditures 6,020,148 7,565,043 26,908,333 17,667,969 17,803,796Debt Service 1,121,392 99,117 969,477 719,890 719,890Contingency 0 0 13,179,794 235,256 225,414Fund Transfers - Expense 1,302,302 362,760 160,019 161,617 161,617Total Fund Expenditures 2,423,694 461,877 14,309,290 1,116,763 1,106,921Ending Fund Balance 8,399,994 17,489,977 0 0 0

Total Requirements 16,843,836 25,516,897 41,217,623 18,784,732 18,910,717

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland Parks Memorial Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland Parks Memorial Fund was established to receive proceeds fromgrants as well as donations from foundations, friends' organizations, neighborhoodassociations, and other entities. These funds often have restrictions related topurpose and the time to use such funds.

Fund Requirements Resources within this fund are typically used for one-time expenditures for specificimprovements or services. Individual grants or donations are managed in separateaccounts within the fund, according to the provisions of the contract, grant, ordonor agreement.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Parks set up a sub-fund to accept donations specifically addressed to the Children’sArboretum. This came in response to the memorial wishes of Dick Towle’s family.

Parks is also in the process of setting up a special revenue sub-fund for thecollection of parking revenues at Washington Park, earmarked for futureimprovements at the park.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 58,882 270,400 40,000 40,000 40,000Charges for Services 90,559 79,163 31,402 74,500 74,500Miscellaneous 738,871 643,267 644,347 661,140 661,140

Total External Revenues 888,312 992,830 715,749 775,640 775,640Fund Transfers - Revenue 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200

Total Internal Revenues 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200Beginning Fund Balance 2,180,257 2,114,468 2,108,538 2,636,512 2,636,512

Total Resources 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352Requirements

Personnel Services 453,951 258,366 558,898 523,537 523,537External Materials and Services 414,286 168,598 1,033,781 1,124,201 1,124,201Internal Materials and Services 108,064 510,696 672,563 475,171 475,171Capital Outlay 0 0 962 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 976,301 937,660 2,266,204 2,122,909 2,122,909Contingency 0 0 650,889 1,275,443 1,275,443Fund Transfers - Expense 25,000 93,212 0 50,000 50,000

Total Fund Expenditures 25,000 93,212 650,889 1,325,443 1,325,443Ending Fund Balance 2,114,468 2,133,531 0 0 0

Total Requirements 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352

Page 51: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 47

Fund Summary Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund

2 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund Fund SummaryParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

3. Address capital repairs and replacement to comply with safety, health, and code requirements.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior YearParks has completed survey and research work for a potential bond measure, butpostponed the delivery of such a measure until the economy becomes moresuitable. It is anticipated that in 2013 more discussion and awareness of a potentialbond measure will occur.

In addition, the following projects were completed during the past year:

Terrace Trails Park Development - SDC Frazier, NE Sumner, Furey and Claradon Community Gardens -General Fund

and Donations Peninsula Park Windows, Lighting Retrofits, and the Matt Dishman -Solar

Installation ARRA grants Parklane and Gilbert Primary playgrounds - E205 Initiative SW Tennis Court Resurfacing and Matt Dishman Lockers - Parks Operating

Works continues on the following projects:

Maintenance Facility Improvements at Delta Park and close out of ChimneyPark

South Waterfront Greenway Trail Pittock Mansion Balustrades Thomas Cully Park Development

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland Parks Memorial Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland Parks Memorial Fund was established to receive proceeds fromgrants as well as donations from foundations, friends' organizations, neighborhoodassociations, and other entities. These funds often have restrictions related topurpose and the time to use such funds.

Fund Requirements Resources within this fund are typically used for one-time expenditures for specificimprovements or services. Individual grants or donations are managed in separateaccounts within the fund, according to the provisions of the contract, grant, ordonor agreement.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Parks set up a sub-fund to accept donations specifically addressed to the Children’sArboretum. This came in response to the memorial wishes of Dick Towle’s family.

Parks is also in the process of setting up a special revenue sub-fund for thecollection of parking revenues at Washington Park, earmarked for futureimprovements at the park.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 58,882 270,400 40,000 40,000 40,000Charges for Services 90,559 79,163 31,402 74,500 74,500Miscellaneous 738,871 643,267 644,347 661,140 661,140

Total External Revenues 888,312 992,830 715,749 775,640 775,640Fund Transfers - Revenue 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200

Total Internal Revenues 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200Beginning Fund Balance 2,180,257 2,114,468 2,108,538 2,636,512 2,636,512

Total Resources 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352Requirements

Personnel Services 453,951 258,366 558,898 523,537 523,537External Materials and Services 414,286 168,598 1,033,781 1,124,201 1,124,201Internal Materials and Services 108,064 510,696 672,563 475,171 475,171Capital Outlay 0 0 962 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 976,301 937,660 2,266,204 2,122,909 2,122,909Contingency 0 0 650,889 1,275,443 1,275,443Fund Transfers - Expense 25,000 93,212 0 50,000 50,000

Total Fund Expenditures 25,000 93,212 650,889 1,325,443 1,325,443Ending Fund Balance 2,114,468 2,133,531 0 0 0

Total Requirements 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352

Page 52: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 48 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Parks Endowment FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Parks Endowment Fund

Fund Overview

The Parks Endowment Fund accounts for gifts, donations, and endowments of apermanent nature, whereby the donation principal is invested and interest earningsare available to support programs and services as directed by the funding donor.There are currently four endowments within the fund.

F.L. Beach CurbsideRose Award Trust

This endowment was established in 1975. Its purpose is to encourage planting andmaintaining roses that will be visible to the public. An incentive system wasestablished through awards and annual competitions, which are funded from thetrust. Funds not used in a given year are reinvested to increase fund balances.

Parks MaintenanceEndowment

This endowment was established in FY 2002-03. Earnings are reinvested to increasethe size of the endowment with the intent of eventually generating sufficientinterest income to help maintain the parks system.

Washington ParkChildren'sPlaygroundEndowment

This endowment was established by a $75,000 donation from the Portland RotaryClub with the goal of maintaining the playground in Washington Park.

The Dietz Fountainat Wallace ParkEndowment

This endowment was established in FY 2003-04 with an original gift of $4,500.Income from this endowment contributes toward maintenance of the DietzFountain.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

There are no significant changes in activities for FY 2013-14.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesMiscellaneous 1,218 1,155 820 955 955

Total External Revenues 1,218 1,155 820 955 955Total Internal Revenues 0 0 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 182,999 181,792 181,856 181,930 181,930Total Resources 184,217 182,947 182,676 182,885 182,885Requirements

Personnel Services 0 0 1,000 750 750External Materials and Services 225 0 18,489 18,285 18,285Internal Materials and Services 2,200 600 50 775 775

Total Bureau Expenditures 2,425 600 19,539 19,810 19,810Contingency 0 0 377 285 285

Total Fund Expenditures 0 0 377 285 285Ending Fund Balance 181,792 182,347 162,760 162,790 162,790

Total Requirements 184,217 182,947 182,676 182,885 182,885

Parks Endowment Fund Fund Summary

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland International Raceway FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland International Raceway Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland International Raceway Fund is an enterprise fund and accounts for allresources and requirements associated with management and operation of thePortland International Raceway (PIR).

The primary sources of ongoing revenues to the Portland International RacewayFund are concession revenues from food and beverage services, product andsouvenir sales during various events, and PIR facilities rental revenues.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Rental Rates Responding to the economic downturn and the impact to inflation, PIR did notraise rates in FY 2012-13 and foresees FY 2013-14 to be the same.

New Developments In FY 2013-14, PIR will budget $75,000 to update the raceway’s 2004 Master Plan.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesCharges for Services 1,649,515 1,748,771 1,811,666 1,853,757 1,853,757Miscellaneous 9,069 8,621 5,893 7,945 7,945

Total External Revenues 1,658,584 1,757,392 1,817,559 1,861,702 1,861,702Fund Transfers - Revenue 95,809 288 457 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 95,809 288 457 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 680,614 611,614 676,155 627,810 627,810

Total Resources 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512Requirements

Personnel Services 736,219 775,323 773,887 783,518 783,518External Materials and Services 529,509 487,932 553,557 583,473 583,473Internal Materials and Services 123,161 99,691 111,899 123,730 127,177Capital Outlay 30,000 0 0 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 1,418,889 1,362,946 1,439,343 1,490,721 1,494,168Debt Service 296,128 296,866 303,254 303,695 303,695Contingency 0 0 704,303 631,897 628,450Fund Transfers - Expense 108,376 44,327 47,271 63,199 63,199

Total Fund Expenditures 404,504 341,193 1,054,828 998,791 995,344Ending Fund Balance 611,614 665,155 0 0 0

Total Requirements 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512

Page 53: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 49

Fund Summary Portland International Raceway Fund

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland International Raceway FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland International Raceway Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland International Raceway Fund is an enterprise fund and accounts for allresources and requirements associated with management and operation of thePortland International Raceway (PIR).

The primary sources of ongoing revenues to the Portland International RacewayFund are concession revenues from food and beverage services, product andsouvenir sales during various events, and PIR facilities rental revenues.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Rental Rates Responding to the economic downturn and the impact to inflation, PIR did notraise rates in FY 2012-13 and foresees FY 2013-14 to be the same.

New Developments In FY 2013-14, PIR will budget $75,000 to update the raceway’s 2004 Master Plan.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesCharges for Services 1,649,515 1,748,771 1,811,666 1,853,757 1,853,757Miscellaneous 9,069 8,621 5,893 7,945 7,945

Total External Revenues 1,658,584 1,757,392 1,817,559 1,861,702 1,861,702Fund Transfers - Revenue 95,809 288 457 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 95,809 288 457 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 680,614 611,614 676,155 627,810 627,810

Total Resources 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512Requirements

Personnel Services 736,219 775,323 773,887 783,518 783,518External Materials and Services 529,509 487,932 553,557 583,473 583,473Internal Materials and Services 123,161 99,691 111,899 123,730 127,177Capital Outlay 30,000 0 0 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 1,418,889 1,362,946 1,439,343 1,490,721 1,494,168Debt Service 296,128 296,866 303,254 303,695 303,695Contingency 0 0 704,303 631,897 628,450Fund Transfers - Expense 108,376 44,327 47,271 63,199 63,199

Total Fund Expenditures 404,504 341,193 1,054,828 998,791 995,344Ending Fund Balance 611,614 665,155 0 0 0

Total Requirements 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512

Page 54: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 50 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Golf Fund Fund Summary

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Golf FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Golf Fund

Fund Overview

The Golf Fund is an enterprise fund and accounts for all resources andrequirements of the Portland Parks & Recreation Golf program.

The primary sources of revenue to the Golf Fund are:

Revenues from contracts with concessionaires located at each of the City's golfcourses. This includes revenues derived from food and beverage services,clothing and equipment sales, golf lessons, cart rental, driving range activitieswhere available, and collection of greens fees.

Greens fees are paid by golfers for each round of golf played whether, nineholes or 18 holes.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Heron LakesClubhouseDevelopment

The Golf program completed the conceptual design for a new clubhouse at HeronLakes Golf Course during FY 2009-10. The next phase of design beginning in FY2010-11 looked at land use, engineering, and permitting requirements. For FY 2011-12, 50% of construction documents were completed. In FY 2013-14 we will continueto monitor this project.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14 RequestedFY 2013-14

ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 13,650 0 0 0 0Charges for Services 7,386,018 7,706,697 7,932,689 7,954,759 7,954,759Miscellaneous 15,349 32,455 10,722 12,271 12,271

Total External Revenues 7,415,017 7,739,152 7,943,411 7,967,030 7,967,030Fund Transfers - Revenue 97,025 1,992 851 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 97,025 1,992 851 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 1,577,624 1,393,529 822,661 1,166,847 1,166,847

Total Resources 9,089,666 9,134,673 8,766,923 9,133,877 9,133,877Requirements

Personnel Services 3,058,329 3,108,523 3,310,202 3,362,442 3,362,442External Materials and Services 3,010,103 2,919,013 3,382,100 3,262,042 3,262,042Internal Materials and Services 421,095 521,243 545,308 603,215 619,778Capital Outlay 71,668 336,955 198,500 150,000 150,000

Total Bureau Expenditures 6,561,195 6,885,734 7,436,110 7,377,699 7,394,262Debt Service 115,248 124,547 140,411 156,140 156,140Contingency 0 0 877,984 1,268,329 1,251,766Fund Transfers - Expense 1,019,694 1,157,938 312,418 331,709 331,709

Total Fund Expenditures 1,134,942 1,282,485 1,330,813 1,756,178 1,739,615Ending Fund Balance 1,393,529 966,454 0 0 0

Total Requirements 9,089,666 9,134,673 8,766,923 9,133,877 9,133,877

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland International Raceway FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland International Raceway Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland International Raceway Fund is an enterprise fund and accounts for allresources and requirements associated with management and operation of thePortland International Raceway (PIR).

The primary sources of ongoing revenues to the Portland International RacewayFund are concession revenues from food and beverage services, product andsouvenir sales during various events, and PIR facilities rental revenues.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Rental Rates Responding to the economic downturn and the impact to inflation, PIR did notraise rates in FY 2012-13 and foresees FY 2013-14 to be the same.

New Developments In FY 2013-14, PIR will budget $75,000 to update the raceway’s 2004 Master Plan.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesCharges for Services 1,649,515 1,748,771 1,811,666 1,853,757 1,853,757Miscellaneous 9,069 8,621 5,893 7,945 7,945

Total External Revenues 1,658,584 1,757,392 1,817,559 1,861,702 1,861,702Fund Transfers - Revenue 95,809 288 457 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 95,809 288 457 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 680,614 611,614 676,155 627,810 627,810

Total Resources 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512Requirements

Personnel Services 736,219 775,323 773,887 783,518 783,518External Materials and Services 529,509 487,932 553,557 583,473 583,473Internal Materials and Services 123,161 99,691 111,899 123,730 127,177Capital Outlay 30,000 0 0 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 1,418,889 1,362,946 1,439,343 1,490,721 1,494,168Debt Service 296,128 296,866 303,254 303,695 303,695Contingency 0 0 704,303 631,897 628,450Fund Transfers - Expense 108,376 44,327 47,271 63,199 63,199

Total Fund Expenditures 404,504 341,193 1,054,828 998,791 995,344Ending Fund Balance 611,614 665,155 0 0 0

Total Requirements 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512

Page 55: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 51

Fund Summary Golf Fund

2 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget

Golf Fund Fund SummaryParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Rose City LakeRenovation

Two lakes at Rose City Golf Course are in need of major maintenance. The lakeswill be dredged and resealed by the end of FY 2013-14. It is anticipated that onelake will cost $25,000.

Fleet Upgrades When the Golf Program was established many pieces of equipment werepurchased through the Golf Fund and never placed on a replacement schedule. InFY 2013-14 an initiative for the Fleet Department to manage the remainingequipment Golf uses will begin. A budget of $125,000 will include the cost of theequipment and one year’s replacement fund charges.

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland Parks Memorial FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland Parks Memorial Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland Parks Memorial Fund was established to receive proceeds fromgrants as well as donations from foundations, friends' organizations, neighborhoodassociations, and other entities. These funds often have restrictions related topurpose and the time to use such funds.

Fund Requirements Resources within this fund are typically used for one-time expenditures for specificimprovements or services. Individual grants or donations are managed in separateaccounts within the fund, according to the provisions of the contract, grant, ordonor agreement.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Parks set up a sub-fund to accept donations specifically addressed to the Children’sArboretum. This came in response to the memorial wishes of Dick Towle’s family.

Parks is also in the process of setting up a special revenue sub-fund for thecollection of parking revenues at Washington Park, earmarked for futureimprovements at the park.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesLicenses & Permits 58,882 270,400 40,000 40,000 40,000Charges for Services 90,559 79,163 31,402 74,500 74,500Miscellaneous 738,871 643,267 644,347 661,140 661,140

Total External Revenues 888,312 992,830 715,749 775,640 775,640Fund Transfers - Revenue 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200

Total Internal Revenues 47,200 57,105 92,806 36,200 36,200Beginning Fund Balance 2,180,257 2,114,468 2,108,538 2,636,512 2,636,512

Total Resources 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352Requirements

Personnel Services 453,951 258,366 558,898 523,537 523,537External Materials and Services 414,286 168,598 1,033,781 1,124,201 1,124,201Internal Materials and Services 108,064 510,696 672,563 475,171 475,171Capital Outlay 0 0 962 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 976,301 937,660 2,266,204 2,122,909 2,122,909Contingency 0 0 650,889 1,275,443 1,275,443Fund Transfers - Expense 25,000 93,212 0 50,000 50,000

Total Fund Expenditures 25,000 93,212 650,889 1,325,443 1,325,443Ending Fund Balance 2,114,468 2,133,531 0 0 0

Total Requirements 3,115,769 3,164,403 2,917,093 3,448,352 3,448,352

Page 56: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 52 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Golf Revenue Bond Redemption FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Golf Revenue Bond Redemption Fund

Fund Overview

The Golf Revenue Bond Redemption Fund receives cash transfers from the GolfFund and pays principal and interest on all debt associated with the Golf program.Debt service is payable from and secured by net revenues from the Golf program.This fund also holds debt service reserves as required by the covenants ofindividual debt issues.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

The Golf Program’s outstanding revenue bond debt was extinguished in FY 2011-12. It is anticipated that the program will continue to construct the Heron LakesClubhouse and will need to look to the bond market to acquire such financing inthe near future. There will be no payments from the Golf Revenue BondRedemption Fund in FY 2013-14.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesMiscellaneous 4,301 7,420 0 0 0

Total External Revenues 4,301 7,420 0 0 0Fund Transfers - Revenue 807,280 912,420 0 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 807,280 912,420 0 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 636,605 640,906 0 0 0

Total Resources 1,448,186 1,560,746 0 0 0RequirementsTotal Bureau Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0

Debt Service 807,280 1,557,704 0 0 0Total Fund Expenditures 807,280 1,557,704 0 0 0

Ending Fund Balance 640,906 3,042 0 0 0Total Requirements 1,448,186 1,560,746 0 0 0

Golf Revenue Bond Redemption Fund Fund Summary

City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2013-14 Requested Budget 1

Fund Summary Portland International Raceway FundParks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area

Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Portland International Raceway Fund

Fund Overview

The Portland International Raceway Fund is an enterprise fund and accounts for allresources and requirements associated with management and operation of thePortland International Raceway (PIR).

The primary sources of ongoing revenues to the Portland International RacewayFund are concession revenues from food and beverage services, product andsouvenir sales during various events, and PIR facilities rental revenues.

Managing Agency Portland Parks & Recreation

Significant Changes from Prior Year

Rental Rates Responding to the economic downturn and the impact to inflation, PIR did notraise rates in FY 2012-13 and foresees FY 2013-14 to be the same.

New Developments In FY 2013-14, PIR will budget $75,000 to update the raceway’s 2004 Master Plan.

Actual

FY 2010-11 Actual

FY 2011-12 Revised

FY 2012-13

Requested No DP

FY 2013-14

Requested Total

FY 2013-14 ProposedFY 2013-14

ResourcesCharges for Services 1,649,515 1,748,771 1,811,666 1,853,757 1,853,757Miscellaneous 9,069 8,621 5,893 7,945 7,945

Total External Revenues 1,658,584 1,757,392 1,817,559 1,861,702 1,861,702Fund Transfers - Revenue 95,809 288 457 0 0

Total Internal Revenues 95,809 288 457 0 0Beginning Fund Balance 680,614 611,614 676,155 627,810 627,810

Total Resources 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512Requirements

Personnel Services 736,219 775,323 773,887 783,518 783,518External Materials and Services 529,509 487,932 553,557 583,473 583,473Internal Materials and Services 123,161 99,691 111,899 123,730 127,177Capital Outlay 30,000 0 0 0 0

Total Bureau Expenditures 1,418,889 1,362,946 1,439,343 1,490,721 1,494,168Debt Service 296,128 296,866 303,254 303,695 303,695Contingency 0 0 704,303 631,897 628,450Fund Transfers - Expense 108,376 44,327 47,271 63,199 63,199

Total Fund Expenditures 404,504 341,193 1,054,828 998,791 995,344Ending Fund Balance 611,614 665,155 0 0 0

Total Requirements 2,435,007 2,369,294 2,494,171 2,489,512 2,489,512

Page 57: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 53

BRASSDecision Package Summaries

Page 58: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 54 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2013-14 Requested Budget PP&R Decision Package List

Pkg. Priority Budget Proposal Ongoing One-time BES FTE

Add Back PropsalsPK 12 1 Revenue Add Back Horticultural Work in Parks $204,400 2.00PK 13 2 Revenue Add Back Hoyt Arboretum $116,000 1.00PK 11 3 Revenue Add Back Dutch Elm Disease Program $153,000 1.00PK 08 4 10% Add Back Central Services Maintenance $500,000 5.00PK 14 5 10% Add Back Natural Areas Maintenance $100,000 1.00PK 19 6 10% Add Back SUN CS - 3 sites $234,468 3.00PK 07 7 10% Add Back Capital Major Maintenance $125,985 PK 17 8 10% Add Back Recreation Services & Staffing $424,926 6.00PK 09 9 10% Add Back Central Srvcs Contracted Services $107,000PK 20 10 10% Add Back SUN CS Pass Through $272,000PK 16 11 10% Add Back Plant Prop & Tree Nursery Program $237,000 2.00PK 18 12 10% Add Back Sellwood Community Center $60,451 2.00PK 10 13 10% Add Back Delta Park Athletic Field Services $70,356 1.00PK 01 14 10% Add Back Administration Community Relations $57,046 1.00PK 03 15 10% Add Back Administration - Safety & Security $84,740 1.00PK 15 16 10% Add Back Pass Throughs (Linnton/Leach) $16,072PK 05 17 10% Add Back Aging & Disability Pass Through $565,819PK 06 18 10% Add Back Buckman Pool $146,324 1.00PK 02 19 10% Add Back Administration M&S $300,000PK 04 20 10% Add Back Administration - Workers Comp $60,000PK 22 10% Add Back - OMF Internal Services $372,913PK 23 1 Teen Programming $300,000 3.00PK 24 2 Summer Lunch Program $70,000PK 30 1 Forest Park Ranger - BES IAA $72,000 1.00PK 31 2 Protect The Best Program - BES IAA $250,000 3.00PK 32 3 Youth Conservation Crew - BES IAA $175,000PK 33 4 Willamette River Stewardship - BES IAA $132,778 1.00PK 34 5 Dutch Elm Inoculant - BES IAA $62,500PK 35 6 Urban Forestry Tree Inspector - BES IAA $81,000 1.00PK 36 7 Education & Outreach - BES IAA $122,000 1.00PK 25 O&M Requests for Acquisitions & Improvements $674,401 $44,185 1.00

Subtotal Add Proposals $4,882,901 $414,185 $895,278 38.00

Revenue ProposalsPK 26 1 Large Community Center Admission Pass Fees $204,400PK 27 2 Non-Resident Fees $25,000PK 28 3 Swim Lesson Fees $150,000PK 29 4 Miscellaneous Fees $92,948

Subtotal Revenue Proposals $472,348

FY 2013-14 Requested Budget PP&R Decision Package List

Page 59: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 55

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

01Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- P

arks

PK

_12

- Rev

enue

Add

Bac

k - H

ortic

ultu

ral W

ork

in P

arks

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

167,

844

167,

844

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

36,5

5636

,556

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES20

4,40

020

4,40

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry20

4,40

020

4,40

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES20

4,40

020

4,40

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

002.

002.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

2.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l con

tinue

s tw

o po

sitio

ns th

at c

are

for d

evel

oped

par

ks. T

hree

pos

ition

s w

ere

elim

inat

ed in

the

FY 2

012-

13 b

udge

t. If

not

rest

ored

, we

will

see

pos

ition

s re

duce

d by

one

-third

over

all,

from

15

to 1

0.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:H

ortic

ultu

ral s

taff

prim

arily

focu

ses

on th

e lo

ng-te

rm h

ealth

of p

ark

gree

n in

frast

ruct

ure

incl

udin

g pr

unin

g, p

lant

ing,

wee

ding

, mul

chin

g an

d ed

ging

. The

y al

so a

ssis

t with

oth

er ta

sks

asne

eded

, suc

h as

dai

ly c

are

and

clea

ning

, res

troom

mai

nten

ance

, hau

ling,

gra

ffiti

and

vand

alis

m re

pair,

leaf

rem

oval

, etc

.

In th

e cu

rren

t yea

r’s b

udge

t, pa

rks

mai

nten

ance

cre

ws

lost

thre

e ho

rticu

ltura

list p

ositi

ons

as w

ell a

s se

vera

l oth

er p

erm

anen

t sta

ff po

sitio

ns, a

nd a

sig

nific

ant a

mou

nt o

f sea

sona

l res

ourc

es.

If th

e pr

opos

al is

not

app

rove

d, th

e co

mbi

ned

year

s’ lo

ss o

f cap

acity

will

furth

er d

egra

de p

ark

plan

ts’ c

ondi

tion,

and

the

gene

ral a

ppea

ranc

e of

the

park

s w

ill d

eclin

e. I

n ad

ditio

n, C

rime

Pre

vent

ion

thro

ugh

Env

ironm

enta

l Des

ign

(CP

TED

) effo

rts w

ill d

ecre

ase

furth

er; e

.g.,

prun

ing

for v

isib

ility

and

elim

inat

ing

cove

r for

neg

ativ

e ac

tiviti

es.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

12 o

f 35

Page 60: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 56 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

02Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- N

atur

al A

reas

PK

_13

- Rev

enue

Add

bac

k - H

oyt A

rbor

etum

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

104,

000

104,

000

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

12,0

0012

,000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES11

6,00

011

6,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry11

6,00

011

6,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES11

6,00

011

6,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g fo

r a H

ortic

ultu

ralis

t pos

ition

($76

,000

) and

ope

ratin

g ex

pens

es a

t Hoy

t Arb

oret

um ($

40,0

00).

The

Hor

ticul

tura

list c

ares

for t

he c

olle

ctio

n, d

irect

s vo

lunt

eer

effo

rts, a

nd p

erfo

rms

a va

riety

of o

ther

dut

ies

to k

eep

the

arbo

retu

m c

lean

and

saf

e fo

r the

pub

lic.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ring

this

pro

posa

l will

allo

w th

e fu

ndin

g fo

r ope

ratin

g ex

pens

es a

s w

ell a

s a

Hor

ticul

tura

l pos

ition

to c

ontin

ue.

Cur

rent

fund

ing

is a

lloca

ted

as fo

llow

s:O

pera

ting

expe

nses

:E

quip

men

t: sm

all m

achi

nery

(pow

er w

heel

barr

ow, h

edge

trim

mer

s, m

ower

s, d

ingo

, cha

insa

ws)

, spr

ayer

s

Veh

icle

s: K

ubot

a, C

lub

Car

, tru

ck a

nd tr

aile

r, fu

el.

Mat

eria

ls a

nd s

uppl

ies:

pla

nt m

ater

ial,

plan

t pro

paga

tion,

gra

vel f

or tr

ails

, mul

ch, s

tone

pav

ers,

sig

nage

, bou

lder

s, c

lean

ing

and

offic

e su

pplie

s.

Hor

ticul

turis

t pos

ition

dut

ies:

Col

lect

ion

care

: pru

ning

, thi

nnin

g, c

uttin

g, m

ulch

ing,

wat

erin

g, p

est c

ontro

l, se

lect

ion

of re

plac

emen

t pla

ntin

gs, p

lant

pro

paga

tion.

Vol

unte

er s

ervi

ces:

dire

cts

effo

rts o

f vol

unte

ers

who

sup

port

the

Arb

oret

um b

y co

nduc

ting

trail

mai

nten

ance

, pla

nt m

ulch

ing,

irrig

atio

n, b

rush

hau

ling,

gen

eral

hor

ticul

tura

l out

reac

h to

the

publ

ic.

Saf

ety:

gra

ffiti

abat

emen

t, tra

sh re

mov

al, r

estro

om s

ervi

cing

.

Tool

and

equ

ipm

ent m

aint

enan

ce: s

harp

en to

ols,

cle

an a

nd c

alib

rate

spr

ay e

quip

men

t, m

aint

ain

chai

nsaw

s, s

mal

l mac

hine

ry c

are.

The

elim

inat

ion

of th

is p

ositi

on w

ould

resu

lt in

a re

duct

ion

of a

ll ho

rticu

ltura

l ser

vice

s lis

ted

abov

e. C

erta

in a

spec

ts w

ould

be

trans

ferr

ed to

the

cura

tor,

redu

cing

the

capa

city

to c

ompl

ete

high

leve

l wor

k in

clud

ing

care

of a

nd p

lann

ing

for t

he c

olle

ctio

n. T

he e

limin

atio

n of

this

fund

ing

wou

ld re

sult

in a

n el

imin

atio

n of

new

pro

ject

s su

ch a

s he

rbar

ium

vou

cher

ing,

oak

sav

anna

hin

stal

latio

n an

d ad

ditio

nal p

ublic

tour

s. P

lant

repl

acem

ent a

s a

resu

lt of

loss

wou

ld b

e m

inim

al.

Map

ping

and

trac

king

of t

he c

olle

ctio

n w

ould

like

ly c

ease

.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

13 o

f 35

Page 61: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 57

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

03Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- Tr

ees

PK

_11

- Rev

enue

Add

Bac

k - D

utch

Elm

Dis

ease

Pro

gram

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

123,

615

123,

615

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

29,3

8529

,385

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES15

3,00

015

3,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry15

3,00

015

3,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES15

3,00

015

3,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g to

sup

port

PP

&R

’s D

utch

Elm

Dis

ease

(DE

D) p

reve

ntio

n pr

ogra

m.

This

por

tion

of th

e pr

ogra

m c

urre

ntly

incl

udes

inoc

ulat

ions

, mon

itorin

g an

d re

mov

al o

faf

fect

ed n

on-p

ark

trees

. 45

0 tre

es a

re in

ocul

ated

on

a th

ree-

year

cyc

le. R

elat

edly

, the

Bur

eau

of E

nviro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

has

indi

cate

d th

at th

ey w

ill c

ut th

e fu

ndin

g fo

r the

DE

D in

ocul

ant f

orFY

201

3-14

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

gram

will

allo

w P

P&

R to

con

tinue

the

follo

win

g w

ork:

1) m

onito

ring

for i

nfec

ted

trees

, 2) i

nocu

latin

g pr

iorit

y tre

es a

gain

st d

isea

se, a

nd 3

) rem

ovin

g an

d di

spos

ing

ofin

fect

ed p

ublic

tree

s to

det

er s

prea

d of

the

fung

al in

fect

ion.

450

tree

s ar

e cu

rren

tly in

ocul

ated

on

a 3-

year

cyc

le, a

nd la

st y

ear,

37 tr

ees

wer

e re

mov

ed d

ue to

infe

ctio

n. If

the

prog

ram

is n

otfu

nded

, it w

ill re

sult

in in

crea

sed

Am

eric

an e

lm (U

. am

eric

ana)

infe

ctio

n th

roug

h un

che

cked

spr

ead

of th

e di

seas

e, tr

ee m

orta

lity,

and

rem

oval

. Som

e of

thes

e el

ms

are

larg

e, v

alua

ble

trees

incl

udin

g m

any

of th

e P

ark

Blo

cks

trees

. Whi

le m

any

of th

ese

elm

s ar

e ap

proa

chin

g ov

erm

atur

ity, m

ost c

ould

per

sist

for t

wo

or th

ree

deca

des

if th

ey re

mai

n he

alth

y.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

11 o

f 35

Page 62: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 58 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

04Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- C

entra

l Ser

vice

sP

K_0

8 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Cen

tral S

ervi

ces

Mai

nten

ance

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

385,

000

385,

000

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

115,

000

115,

000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES50

0,00

050

0,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry50

0,00

050

0,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES50

0,00

050

0,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

005.

005.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

5.00

5.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fiv

e po

sitio

ns in

PP

&R

’s C

entra

l Ser

vice

s, in

clud

ing

mat

eria

ls a

nd s

ervi

ces

rela

ted

to th

e w

ork

acco

mpl

ishe

d by

thes

e po

sitio

ns. T

he fi

ve p

ositi

ons

wer

e le

ft un

fille

ddu

e to

city

bud

get d

irect

ion

for F

Y 2

012-

13 to

cap

ture

vac

ancy

sav

ings

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

posa

l will

pre

serv

e th

e ca

paci

ty o

f PP

&R

to c

ontin

ue p

rogr

ess

tow

ards

impr

ovin

g th

e co

nditi

on o

f bui

lt as

sets

. W

ithou

t res

tora

tion

of th

ese

posi

tions

, sch

edul

ed a

ndpr

even

tativ

e m

aint

enan

ce w

ill li

kely

fall

belo

w p

erfo

rman

ce ta

rget

s, th

ereb

y in

crea

sing

the

back

log

of d

efer

red

mai

nten

ance

. R

epai

r wor

k w

ill fo

cus

on th

ose

asse

ts w

ith th

e hi

ghes

tpr

obab

ility

and

con

sequ

ence

of f

ailu

re.

Ass

et im

prov

emen

ts w

ill b

e un

derta

ken

if m

anda

ted

by C

ode,

how

ever

, im

prov

emen

ts fo

r fun

ctio

n an

d ae

sthe

tics

(suc

h as

pai

ntin

g) a

re n

ot li

kely

tobe

pos

sibl

e w

ith re

duce

d st

aff.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

8 of

35

Page 63: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 59

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

05Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- N

atur

al A

reas

PK

_14

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - N

atur

al A

rea

Mai

nten

ance

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

100,

000

100,

000

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

00

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES10

0,00

010

0,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry10

0,00

010

0,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES10

0,00

010

0,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s th

e re

cent

ly a

lloca

ted

oper

atin

g fu

nds

for P

P&

R n

atur

al a

rea

mai

nten

ance

, eco

logi

cal r

esto

ratio

n, a

nd tr

ail m

aint

enan

ce w

ork

need

ed fo

r new

ly a

cqui

red

prop

ertie

s.Th

e pr

opos

al w

ould

allo

w P

P&

R to

add

one

Bot

anic

Spe

cial

ist F

TE to

sup

port

this

wor

k.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

fund

ing

will

allo

w P

P&

R to

util

ize

rece

nt fu

ndin

g to

ade

quat

ely

mai

ntai

n its

new

ly a

cqui

red

Nat

ural

Are

a pr

oper

ties.

New

pro

perti

es w

ere

acqu

ired

due

to th

e un

ique

oppo

rtuni

ty to

pro

tect

som

e of

the

last

rem

aini

ng in

tact

larg

e pa

rcel

s in

Por

tland

. S

ome,

suc

h as

Riv

er V

iew

Nat

ural

Are

a, h

ave

rece

ived

larg

e pu

blic

inve

stm

ent i

n re

stor

atio

n of

veg

etat

ion

and

habi

tat.

The

expe

ctat

ion

by a

cqui

sitio

n pa

rtner

s is

that

PP

&R

wou

ld ta

ke o

ver m

anag

emen

t and

mai

ntai

n th

e pr

oper

ties

in a

n ec

olog

ical

ly s

ound

man

ner.

As

a re

sult

of th

ese

agre

emen

ts, P

P&

R w

ill b

e re

quire

d to

follo

w th

roug

h on

eco

logi

cal r

esto

ratio

n ac

tiviti

es, r

egar

dles

s of

fund

ing.

With

out r

esto

ring

this

loss

in fu

ndin

g th

e ov

eral

l con

ditio

n of

Nat

ural

Are

apr

oper

ties

will

dec

line.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

14 o

f 35

Page 64: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 60 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

06Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

SU

N C

omm

unity

Sch

ools

PK

_19

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - S

UN

CS

- 3

site

s

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

234,

468

234,

468

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES23

4,46

823

4,46

80

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry23

4,46

823

4,46

80

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES23

4,46

823

4,46

80

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

003.

003.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

3.00

3.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l con

tinue

s fu

ndin

g fo

r the

thre

e S

UN

Com

mun

ity S

choo

ls th

at s

erve

com

para

tivel

y hi

gher

-inco

me

neig

hbor

hood

s an

d th

at a

re o

pera

ted

by P

P&

R w

ithin

the

larg

er S

UN

Ser

vice

Sys

tem

par

tner

ship

with

Mul

tnom

ah C

ount

y an

d P

ortla

nd S

choo

l Dis

trict

s. If

not

fund

ed b

y th

e C

ity o

r the

SU

N S

ervi

ce S

yste

m, t

he fo

llow

ing

thre

e P

P&

R-o

pera

ted

prog

ram

s, in

clud

ing

thre

efu

ll tim

e st

aff p

ositi

ons,

wou

ld b

e di

scon

tinue

d as

of t

he F

Y 2

013-

14 a

cade

mic

yea

r: B

eaum

ont,

Mt.

Tabo

r and

Ros

eway

Hei

ghts

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:If

fund

ing

is re

stor

ed, t

hese

thre

e sc

hool

s an

d ne

ighb

orho

ods

will

con

tinue

to e

xper

ienc

e th

e co

ordi

nate

d ca

re a

nd c

olle

ctiv

e im

pact

of d

edic

ated

sta

ffing

and

pro

gram

s in

tend

ed to

com

plem

ent t

he a

cade

mic

and

soc

ial s

ervi

ces

prov

ided

to c

hild

ren

at th

ese

site

s. T

he la

rges

t num

bers

of p

artic

ipan

ts in

SU

N C

omm

unity

Sch

ools

pro

gram

s ar

e yo

uth

betw

een

the

ages

of

four

and

twen

ty.

The

visi

tatio

n/pa

rtici

patio

n fo

r PP

&R

SU

N C

omm

unity

Sch

ools

in F

Y 2

011-

12 w

as 2

69,0

00. F

ollo

win

g ar

e st

atis

tics

for t

he th

ree

site

s di

scus

sed

in th

is p

acka

ge:

Bea

umon

t - F

Y 2

011-

12 y

outh

atte

ndan

ce o

f 15,

604;

40%

are

chi

ldre

n of

col

or; 3

3% q

ualif

y fo

r Fre

e/R

educ

ed L

unch

Mt.

Tabo

r – F

Y 2

011-

12 y

outh

atte

ndan

ce o

f 13,

770;

34%

are

chi

ldre

n of

col

or; 3

7% q

ualif

y fo

r Fre

e/R

educ

ed L

unch

Ros

eway

Hei

ghts

– F

Y 2

011-

12 y

outh

atte

ndan

ce o

f 21,

878;

28%

are

chi

ldre

n of

col

or; 2

8% q

ualif

y fo

r Fre

e/R

educ

ed L

unch

Con

tinua

tion

of th

e S

UN

Sch

ools

pro

gram

has

man

y im

porta

nt im

plic

atio

ns fo

r ach

ievi

ng th

e go

als

outli

ned

on th

e re

cent

Por

tland

Pla

n. T

hriv

ing,

Edu

cate

d Y

outh

is id

entif

ied

as a

key

them

e w

ithin

the

Por

tland

Pla

n an

d se

vera

l act

ion

item

s in

the

Por

tland

Pla

n re

late

dire

ctly

to S

UN

Sch

ools

.

I

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

19 o

f 35

Page 65: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 61

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

07Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- C

entra

l Ser

vice

s - S

truct

ures

PK

_07

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - C

apita

l Maj

or M

aint

enan

ce

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

125,

985

125,

985

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES12

5,98

512

5,98

50

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESFu

nd T

rans

fers

- R

even

ue12

5,98

512

5,98

50

00

00

0M

isce

llane

ous

Sou

rces

00

00

00

00

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

125,

985

125,

985

00

00

00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s $1

30,0

00 in

fund

ing

for C

apita

l Maj

or M

aint

enan

ce p

roje

cts.

The

se fu

nds

are

used

for c

ode-

man

date

d im

prov

emen

ts, r

epai

r, re

habi

litat

ion

or re

plac

emen

t of a

sset

s.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

is p

ropo

sal p

rese

rves

a p

ortio

n of

the

min

imal

am

ount

($1

mill

ion)

of c

apita

l mai

nten

ance

fund

ing

that

PP

&R

rece

ives

from

the

Gen

eral

Fun

d. T

his

fund

ing

is n

eede

d to

sup

port

an a

nnua

lm

aint

enan

ce fu

ndin

g ga

p of

$35

.2 m

illio

n. R

esto

ring

fund

ing

for C

apita

l Maj

or M

aint

enan

ce a

llow

s P

P&

R to

con

tinue

maj

or e

xter

ior p

aint

ing

and

maj

or ro

of re

pairs

incl

udin

g: M

att D

ishm

anC

omm

unity

Cen

ter e

xter

ior p

aint

ing,

Cha

rles

Jord

an C

omm

unity

Cen

ter e

xter

ior p

aint

ing,

Pie

r Poo

l pai

ntin

g, M

t Tab

or Y

ard

offic

e bu

ildin

g ro

of re

pair,

Ove

rlook

Hou

se ro

of re

pair,

Laur

elhu

rst m

aint

enan

ce b

uild

ing

roof

repa

ir, a

nd R

ose

City

Par

k re

stro

oms

roof

repa

ir.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

7 of

35

Page 66: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 62 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

08Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Com

mun

ity C

ente

rs/S

r Rec

/AIR

PK

_17

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - R

ecre

atio

n S

ervi

ces

& S

taffi

ng

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

424,

926

424,

926

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES42

4,92

642

4,92

60

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry42

4,92

642

4,92

60

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES42

4,92

642

4,92

60

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

006.

006.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

6.00

6.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l rea

ligns

recr

eatio

n st

affin

g to

cre

ate

the

foun

datio

n fo

r a b

ette

r coo

rdin

ated

and

mor

e eq

uita

ble

deliv

ery

of re

crea

tion

serv

ices

. Th

ese

are

serv

ices

whi

ch a

re h

igh

prio

rity

inte

rms

of o

ur m

issi

on a

nd a

re a

ble

to le

vera

ge s

igni

fican

t pro

gram

reve

nue.

If n

ot re

stor

ed, t

he s

cope

of r

ecre

atio

n ac

tiviti

es in

com

mun

ity re

crea

tion

faci

litie

s, a

s w

ell a

s in

spe

cial

ized

city

wid

e pr

ogra

ms,

will

be

redu

ced.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:M

akin

g th

e sh

ift to

coo

rdin

ated

pro

gram

del

iver

y w

ill p

rovi

de a

stro

ng fo

unda

tion

for g

row

th.

Focu

s w

ill in

crea

se o

n ce

rtain

pro

gram

are

as (F

itnes

s, P

resc

hool

/Cam

ps, A

quat

ics,

Spo

rts,

Sen

ior,

Ada

ptiv

e &

Incl

usiv

e R

ecre

atio

n, A

rts, M

usic

), w

ith le

ss fo

cus

and

avai

labi

lity

of m

ore

spec

ific,

nic

he o

rient

ed p

rogr

ams.

Ade

quat

e st

aff l

evel

s w

ill b

e re

tain

ed to

man

age

publ

icre

crea

tion

faci

litie

s sa

fely

, to

prov

ide

good

cus

tom

er s

ervi

ce, a

nd to

con

tinue

to m

ake

prog

ress

in m

eetin

g th

e ne

eds

of u

nder

serv

ed c

omm

uniti

es.

If th

is p

ropo

sal i

s no

t acc

epte

d, th

e re

duce

d ca

paci

ty a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith e

limin

atin

g po

sitio

ns, e

ven

with

the

miti

gatin

g m

easu

res

of c

oord

inat

ing

and

shar

ing

prog

ram

s m

uch

mor

e ef

fect

ivel

yac

ross

the

bure

au, w

ill re

sult

in re

duce

d sc

ope,

flex

ibili

ty, a

nd s

elec

tion

of p

rogr

am o

fferin

gs.

As

the

econ

omy

impr

oves

, it m

ay b

e po

ssib

le th

at p

rogr

ams

can

be e

xpan

ded

as th

eco

mm

unity

’s a

bilit

y an

d w

illin

gnes

s to

sup

port

them

rebu

ilds.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

17 o

f 35

Page 67: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 63

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

09Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- C

entra

l Ser

vice

s - S

truct

ures

PK

_09

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - C

entra

l Srv

cs C

ontra

cted

Ser

vice

s

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

107,

000

107,

000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES10

7,00

010

7,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry10

7,00

010

7,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES10

7,00

010

7,00

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g fo

r con

tract

ed s

ervi

ces,

incl

udin

g pr

ofes

sion

al s

ervi

ces

and

cont

ract

ing

for m

aint

enan

ce, s

uch

as re

plac

emen

t of w

orn

floor

ing

in c

omm

unity

cen

ters

. If t

his

prop

osal

is n

ot fu

nded

it w

ould

redu

ce th

e to

tal a

lloca

tion

for c

ontra

cted

ser

vice

s by

10%

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

posa

l will

pre

serv

e th

e ca

paci

ty o

f PP

&R

to c

ontin

ue p

rogr

ess

tow

ards

impr

ovin

g th

e co

nditi

on o

f bui

lt as

sets

. With

out r

esto

ratio

n of

this

fund

ing,

Cen

tral S

ervi

ces

will

perfo

rm fe

wer

pro

ject

s re

quiri

ng c

ontra

cted

ser

vice

s an

d w

ill fo

cus

avai

labl

e fu

nds

on th

ose

proj

ects

that

mai

ntai

n ex

istin

g se

rvic

e le

vels

and

pre

sent

the

high

est p

roba

bilit

y of

failu

re a

ndco

nseq

uenc

e to

par

k us

ers;

impr

ovem

ents

to a

sset

s ar

e lik

ely

to b

e po

stpo

ned

unle

ss m

anda

ted

by C

ode.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

9 of

35

Page 68: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 64 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

10Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Pas

s-Th

roug

hsP

K_2

0 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- SU

N C

S P

ass

Thro

ugh

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

272,

000

272,

000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES27

2,00

027

2,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry27

2,00

027

2,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES27

2,00

027

2,00

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s P

P&

R p

ass

thro

ugh

fund

s to

Mul

tnom

ah C

ount

y to

sup

port

serv

ice

deliv

ery

in th

e D

epar

tmen

t of H

uman

Ser

vice

s’ S

UN

Ser

vice

Sys

tem

. If n

ot fu

nded

by

the

City

or

the

SU

N S

ervi

ce S

yste

m, t

he e

quiv

alen

t of t

wo

to th

ree

SU

N p

rogr

ams

wou

ld b

e di

scon

tinue

d.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

e fu

ndin

g fo

r tw

o to

thre

e S

UN

Com

mun

ity S

choo

ls o

pera

ted

by n

on-p

rofit

age

ncie

s th

roug

h th

e C

ount

y’s

cont

ract

wou

ld c

ontin

ue.

Thes

e sc

hool

s pr

ovid

e de

dica

ted,

on

site

coo

rdin

atio

n of

wra

p ar

ound

ser

vice

s in

clud

ing

soci

al s

ervi

ces

(hou

sing

, hea

lth, m

enta

l hea

lth, a

nd p

over

ty re

duct

ion)

, aca

dem

ic s

uppo

rt, re

crea

tion

and

enric

hmen

t pro

gram

s. E

ach

site

has

a fu

ll tim

e co

ordi

nato

r who

func

tions

as

part

of th

e st

aff t

eam

.

If th

ere

is a

pos

sibi

lity

of s

eeki

ng n

ew fu

ndin

g fro

m a

noth

er s

ourc

e, it

sho

uld

be p

ursu

ed.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

20 o

f 35

Page 69: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 65

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

11Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mai

nten

ance

- H

ortic

ultu

reP

K_1

6 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Pla

nt P

rop.

& T

ree

Nur

sery

Pro

gram

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

185,

598

185,

598

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

51,4

0251

,402

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES23

7,00

023

7,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry23

7,00

023

7,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES23

7,00

023

7,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

002.

002.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

2.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g to

sup

port

mai

ntai

ning

pla

nt p

ropa

gatio

n an

d tre

e nu

rser

y pr

ogra

ms

with

in P

P&

R.

The

prop

osal

incl

udes

rest

orin

g tw

o po

sitio

ns a

nd a

llow

s P

P&

R to

con

tinue

to p

rovi

de p

lant

sto

ck in

tern

ally

at c

urre

nt le

vels

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

posa

l allo

ws

PP

&R

to m

aint

ain

the

curr

ent p

ract

ice

of p

rovi

ding

pla

nts

from

see

d an

d op

erat

ing

a tre

e nu

rser

y. F

undi

ng a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

is p

ropo

sal i

nclu

des

the

follo

win

g:S

taff

cost

s: $

190,

085/

year

Gre

enho

use

heat

ing,

ele

ctric

al, a

nd e

stim

ated

wat

er c

osts

: $25

,500

/yea

r

Alth

ough

man

y of

thes

e se

rvic

es a

re n

ow re

adily

-ava

ilabl

e fro

m p

rivat

e nu

rser

ies

ther

e ar

e ot

her i

mpa

cts

to n

ote

if th

is fu

nctio

n is

not

rest

ored

, inc

ludi

ng:

1)E

limin

atio

n of

tree

nur

sery

ope

ratio

ns c

ould

be

a co

ncer

n to

adj

acen

t nei

ghbo

rs. A

new

inte

nded

use

and

app

eara

nce

will

nee

d to

be

esta

blis

hed

2)S

ome

spec

ializ

ed p

lant

mat

eria

ls m

ay n

o lo

nger

be

avai

labl

e, a

nd p

lant

pro

cure

men

t ser

vice

may

be

limite

d3)

Som

e hi

stor

ical

use

s of

Mt.

Tabo

r Yar

d fa

cilit

ies

will

be

elim

inat

ed4)

Tabo

r Fac

ility

Cap

ital I

mpr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct p

lans

sho

uld

be re

vise

d to

acc

ount

for r

ealig

ned

Hor

ticul

tura

l Ser

vice

s pr

ogra

m5)

PP

&R

pat

rona

ge o

f priv

ate

nurs

erie

s in

the

regi

on w

ill in

crea

se6)

Hor

ticul

tura

l Ser

vice

s w

ill fo

cus

on p

rovi

ding

hor

ticul

tura

l exp

ertis

e to

Par

ks a

nd th

e C

ity (I

AA

pro

gram

)7)

Zone

s an

d C

ity N

atur

e S

tew

ards

hip

will

redu

ce th

e nu

mbe

r of p

lant

s us

ed in

ste

war

dshi

p pr

ojec

ts a

nd p

arks

mai

nten

ance

. H

ortic

ultu

ral S

ervi

ces

staf

f will

stil

l pro

vide

pro

cure

men

t and

stor

age

serv

ices

, but

the

cost

of p

urch

asin

g th

ese

addi

tiona

l pla

nts

will

be

trans

ferr

ed to

the

PP

&R

uni

ts fo

r who

m th

ey a

re o

rder

ed.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

16 o

f 35

Page 70: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 66 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

12Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Com

mun

ity C

ente

rs w

/o P

ools

PK

_18

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - S

ellw

ood

Com

mun

ity C

ente

r

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

47,3

5147

,351

00

00

00

Inte

rnal

Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

13,1

0013

,100

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES60

,451

60,4

510

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry60

,451

60,4

510

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES60

,451

60,4

510

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

002.

002.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

2.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l con

tinue

s th

e fu

ll sc

ope

of re

crea

tion

prog

ram

s at

Sel

lwoo

d C

omm

unity

Cen

ter.

If no

t res

tore

d, th

e co

mm

unity

cen

ter p

resc

hool

will

rem

ain

open

, but

mos

t oth

er a

ctiv

ities

will

be d

isco

ntin

ued

with

the

loss

of t

wo

full-

time

staf

f for

an

appr

oxim

ate

75%

ser

vice

redu

ctio

n.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Fu

ll pr

ogra

mm

ing

at 1

00%

ser

vice

leve

l, as

wel

l as

stro

ng n

eigh

borh

ood

partn

ersh

ips,

sup

port

and

parti

cipa

tion

wou

ld c

ontin

ue.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

18 o

f 35

Page 71: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 67

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

13Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

City

wid

e S

ports

PK

_10

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - D

elta

Par

k A

thle

tic F

ield

s

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

70,3

5670

,356

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES70

,356

70,3

560

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry70

,356

70,3

560

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES70

,356

70,3

560

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s on

e va

cant

, ful

l-tim

e U

tility

Wor

ker I

I. W

hen

fille

d, th

e pe

rson

in th

is p

ositi

on a

ssis

ts w

ith p

re g

ame

prep

arat

ion

of s

oftb

all a

nd b

aseb

all f

ield

s, a

s w

ell a

s va

rious

dut

ies

to k

eep

the

park

cle

an a

nd s

afe

for t

he p

ublic

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ring

this

pro

posa

l will

allo

w th

e po

sitio

n to

be

fille

d an

d re

sult

in im

prov

ed m

aint

enan

ce a

t city

-wid

e sp

orts

fiel

ds a

s w

ell a

s D

elta

Par

k. B

ecau

se o

f prio

r yea

r bud

get r

educ

tions

,pr

epar

ing

field

s pr

ior t

o pr

actic

es a

nd g

ames

has

bee

n si

gnifi

cant

ly re

duce

d. T

his

prop

osal

will

rest

ore

this

ser

vice

.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

10 o

f 35

Page 72: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 68 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

14Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Com

mun

ity R

elat

ions

PK

_01

- 10%

Add

Bac

k-A

dmin

istra

tion

Com

mun

ity R

elat

ions

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

57,0

4657

,046

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES57

,046

57,0

460

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry57

,046

57,0

460

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES57

,046

57,0

460

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g to

sup

port

one

full-

time

posi

tion

with

in P

P&

R’s

Com

mun

ity R

elat

ions

dep

artm

ent.

This

pos

ition

is 5

0% w

eb c

onte

nt m

anag

emen

t and

adm

inis

tratio

n an

d 50

%vo

lunt

eer s

ervi

ces

adm

inis

trativ

e su

ppor

t and

coo

rdin

atio

n of

cou

rt-or

dere

d co

mm

unity

ser

vice

vol

unte

ers.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:If

this

pos

ition

is re

stor

ed, t

he im

pact

s ar

e as

follo

ws:

Dig

ital c

onte

nt m

anag

emen

t im

pact

s:W

e w

ill c

ontin

ue o

ur d

igita

l com

mun

icat

ions

tran

sitio

n an

d w

e w

ill c

ontin

ue to

cen

trally

man

age

web

upd

ates

. Ind

ivid

uals

thro

ugho

ut th

e P

P&

R s

yste

m h

ave

been

or a

re b

eing

trai

ned

indi

gita

l com

mun

icat

ions

mai

nten

ance

and

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

his

posi

tion

will

man

age

wor

kflo

w a

nd e

nsur

e th

at P

P&

R’s

web

site

is w

ell-o

rgan

ized

, com

plet

e, c

onta

ins

new

con

tent

and

that

all

staf

f in

vario

us d

epar

tmen

ts a

re tr

aine

d to

pro

duce

web

con

tent

effe

ctiv

ely.

Thi

s po

sitio

n w

ill c

ontin

ue to

app

rove

all

web

con

tent

sub

mis

sion

s an

d en

sure

con

sist

ency

and

pro

fess

iona

lism

. Apr

evio

us p

ositi

on d

edic

ated

exc

lusi

vely

to w

eb c

onte

nt a

nd o

ther

mar

ketin

g su

ppor

t was

elim

inat

ed in

the

FY 2

012-

2013

bud

get.

Vol

unte

er s

ervi

ces

impa

cts:

PP

&R

will

con

tinue

to g

row

its

volu

ntee

r bas

e.P

P&

R w

ill tr

ansf

orm

the

cour

t-ord

ered

com

mun

ity s

ervi

ce v

olun

teer

pro

gram

to re

duce

its

mai

nten

ance

to 5

hou

rs/w

eek

(cur

rent

ly 1

0-15

hou

rs/w

eek)

by

usin

g on

line

effic

ienc

ies

and

limiti

ngth

e va

riety

of s

ites

for w

hich

vol

unte

ers

can

sign

up.

Thi

s po

sitio

n w

ill m

aint

ain

the

exis

tenc

e of

that

pro

gram

, mai

ntai

n vo

lunt

eer r

ecor

ds, c

ompl

ete

back

grou

nd c

heck

s, a

nd b

ecom

ead

ditio

nal s

uppo

rt fo

r gro

win

g P

P&

R’s

vol

unte

er b

ase

with

cor

pora

te p

artn

ers

This

pos

ition

is th

e on

ly a

dmin

istra

tive

supp

ort f

unct

ion

with

in th

e co

mm

unity

rela

tions

team

and

incl

udes

impl

emen

ting

maj

or p

roje

cts

such

as

dono

r dat

abas

e cr

eatio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

fvo

lunt

eer a

nd m

arke

ting

data

base

s. I

f thi

s po

sitio

n is

not

rest

ored

, tas

ks m

entio

ned

abov

e w

ill n

eed

to b

ecom

e th

e re

spon

sibi

lity

of o

ther

team

mat

es, p

art t

ime

and

seas

onal

wor

kers

.

I

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

1 of

35

Page 73: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 69

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

15Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Pub

lic S

afet

y &

Sec

urity

PK

_03

- 10%

Add

Bac

k - A

dmin

istra

tion

Saf

ety

& S

ecur

ity

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

84,7

4084

,740

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES84

,740

84,7

400

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry84

,740

84,7

400

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES84

,740

84,7

400

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s on

e pa

rt tim

e S

r. A

dmin

istra

tive

Spe

cial

ist p

ositi

on th

at p

rovi

des

adm

inis

trativ

e se

rvic

es a

nd c

oord

inat

ion

for t

he R

isk/

Saf

ety

Pro

gram

and

the

Sec

urity

/Ran

ger

Pro

gram

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

posa

l will

allo

w P

P&

R to

mai

ntai

n su

ppor

t in

the

area

s of

sec

urity

, em

ploy

ee/p

ublic

saf

ety,

saf

ety

train

ing,

and

risk

man

agem

ent.

With

out t

he a

dmin

istra

tive

func

tion

PP

&R

will

hav

e de

lays

in re

spon

ding

to c

usto

mer

inju

ries

on P

P&

R p

rope

rties

, inc

iden

t rep

orts

, and

liab

ility

cla

ims.

The

posi

tion

curr

ently

pro

vide

s di

rect

sup

port/

coor

dina

tion

in p

rovi

ding

em

ploy

ee s

afet

y an

d w

elln

ess

for P

P&

R e

mpl

oyee

s in

clud

ing:

Com

plet

ion

of s

afet

y tra

inin

g m

atrix

by

job

clas

sific

atio

nsS

afet

y pe

rcep

tion

surv

ey d

evel

opm

ent/i

mpl

emen

tatio

nW

orke

rs c

ompe

nsat

ion

track

ing/

assi

stan

ceIn

cide

nt lo

g tra

ckin

g/re

porti

ng (O

HS

HA

requ

irem

ent)

Em

ploy

ee s

afet

y/he

alth

aw

aren

ess/

prom

otio

n, tr

aini

ng o

ppor

tuni

ties

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

3 of

35

Page 74: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 70 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

16Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Pas

s Th

roug

hsP

K_1

5 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Pas

s Th

roug

hs (L

innt

on/L

each

)

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

16,0

7216

,072

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES16

,072

16,0

720

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry16

,072

16,0

720

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES16

,072

16,0

720

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s a

10%

redu

ctio

n to

the

finan

cial

ass

ista

nce

PP

&R

pro

vide

s to

two

partn

er o

rgan

izat

ions

. Th

ese

incl

ude

Leac

h G

arde

n Fr

iend

s ($

11,6

00);

and

Linn

ton

Com

mun

ityC

ente

r ($4

,472

).

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:

Leac

h G

arde

n Fr

iend

s - H

isto

rical

ly, i

t has

bee

n th

e in

tent

of t

he F

riend

s an

d P

P&

R th

at th

e Fr

iend

s m

anag

e th

e op

erat

ions

, pro

gram

min

g, v

olun

teer

coo

rdin

atio

n, a

nd G

arde

n de

velo

pmen

tin

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Par

ties'

com

mitm

ent t

o pr

eser

ving

the

hist

oric

al, e

duca

tiona

l, an

d ho

rticu

ltura

l sig

nific

ance

of t

he L

each

Bot

anic

al G

arde

n. In

the

curr

ent y

ear,

the

City

’s c

ontri

butio

n is

45%

of t

he L

each

Gar

den

Frie

nds

oper

atin

g bu

dget

. If

fund

ing

for L

each

is n

ot re

stor

ed a

t the

cur

rent

leve

l, it

will

redu

ce th

e ab

ility

of t

he L

each

Gar

den

Frie

nds

to p

rogr

am th

e ga

rden

. Are

duct

ion

in c

urre

nt fu

ndin

g w

ill a

ffect

the

viab

ility

of t

he L

each

Gar

den

Frie

nds

to m

anag

e an

d ca

re fo

r the

Gar

den

and

its p

ublic

acc

essi

bilit

y.Li

nnto

n C

omm

unity

Cen

ter -

The

Lin

nton

Com

mun

ity C

ente

r has

con

tinue

d to

requ

est f

inan

cial

sup

port

for i

ts fa

cilit

y an

d pr

ogra

ms.

The

pur

pose

of t

his

gran

t is

to s

uppo

rt th

e Li

nnto

nC

omm

unity

Cen

ter's

gen

eral

ope

ratio

ns, e

xplic

itly

for o

ut-o

f-sch

ool-h

ours

you

th s

ervi

ces.

The

re is

a n

eed

for o

ngoi

ng fu

ndin

g fro

m th

e C

ity to

sup

port

the

Linn

ton

Com

mun

ity C

ente

r's a

fter

scho

ol re

crea

tion

and

enric

hmen

t pro

gram

s fo

r you

th. A

ll fu

nds

prov

ided

und

er th

is a

gree

men

t are

use

d so

lely

for t

he p

urpo

se o

f sup

porti

ng o

ut-o

f-sch

ool h

ours

clu

bs, s

ports

, and

recr

eatio

n/en

richm

ent p

rogr

ams

to y

outh

at t

he L

innt

on C

omm

unity

Cen

ter.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

15 o

f 35

Page 75: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 71

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

17Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Pas

s Th

roug

hP

K_0

5 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Agi

ng &

Dis

abili

ty P

ass

Thro

ugh

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

565,

819

565,

819

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES56

5,81

956

5,81

90

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry56

5,81

956

5,81

90

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES56

5,81

956

5,81

90

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s $5

65,8

19 p

ass-

thro

ugh

fund

s to

the

Mul

tnom

ah C

ount

y A

ging

& D

isab

ility

Ser

vice

s’ A

cces

s &

Ear

ly In

terv

entio

n P

rogr

am, w

hich

pas

ses

thro

ugh

the

fund

ing

asfo

llow

s:$5

25,8

19 g

oes

to D

istri

ct S

enio

r Cen

ters

(DC

s) fo

r foc

al p

oint

, out

reac

h, h

ealth

pro

mot

ion,

wel

lnes

s, a

nd s

ocia

l enr

ichm

ent a

ctiv

ities

.$4

0,00

0 go

es to

tran

spor

t peo

ple

to th

eir D

C s

ites

and

med

ical

app

oint

men

ts.

The

PP

&R

pas

s th

roug

h re

pres

ents

app

roxi

mat

ely

1% o

f Agi

ng &

Dis

abili

ty S

ervi

ces’

bud

get,

6% o

f the

Acc

ess

& E

arly

Inte

rven

tion

Pro

gram

’s b

udge

t, an

d 26

% o

f the

Dis

trict

Sen

ior

Cen

ters

’ bud

get.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ring

the

Agi

ng &

Dis

abili

ty S

ervi

ces

Pas

s Th

roug

h w

ill c

ontin

ue th

e cu

rren

t lev

el o

f hea

lth, w

elln

ess,

and

pre

vent

ion

serv

ices

to lo

w-in

com

e se

nior

s in

Por

tland

. Th

ese

serv

ices

are

clos

ely

coor

dina

ted

with

PP

&R

’s o

wn

Sen

ior R

ecre

atio

n P

rogr

am, i

nclu

ding

fund

ing

of in

stru

ctor

s, c

oord

inat

ors,

and

tran

spor

tatio

n se

rvic

es, p

artic

ular

ly fo

r dis

adva

ntag

ed s

enio

rs(lo

w-in

com

e an

d et

hnic

/raci

al m

inor

ities

). Fo

r a s

ense

of s

cale

, las

t yea

r a p

oten

tial $

40K

redu

ctio

n to

this

pas

s th

roug

h eq

uate

d to

20,

000

two-

way

trip

s to

get

sen

iors

to a

nd fr

om P

P&

RS

enio

r Rec

reat

ion

prog

ram

s an

d ot

her D

istri

ct S

enio

r Cen

ter a

ctiv

ities

.

If th

ere

is a

pos

sibi

lity

of s

eeki

ng n

ew fu

ndin

g fro

m a

noth

er s

ourc

e, it

sho

uld

be p

ursu

ed.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

5 of

35

Page 76: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 72 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

18Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Aqu

atic

sP

K_0

6 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Buc

kman

Poo

l

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

133,

659

133,

659

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

12,1

6312

,163

00

00

00

Inte

rnal

Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

502

502

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES14

6,32

414

6,32

40

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESC

harg

es fo

r Ser

vice

s57

,562

57,5

620

00

00

0G

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry88

,762

88,7

620

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES14

6,32

414

6,32

40

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s fu

ndin

g to

kee

p B

uckm

an P

ool o

pen.

The

SE

Por

tland

poo

l is

owne

d by

Por

tland

Pub

lic S

choo

ls a

nd h

as b

een

oper

ated

yea

r rou

nd, m

anag

ed b

y on

e P

P&

R F

TE.

His

toric

ally

, thi

s po

ol is

PP

&R

’s m

ost e

xpen

sive

to o

pera

te p

er p

erso

n/pe

r vis

it.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

is p

acka

ge re

stor

es p

ublic

sw

imm

ing

oppo

rtuni

ties

for t

he lo

cal r

esid

ents

who

hav

e ex

pres

sed

stro

ng s

uppo

rt fo

r pre

serv

ing

acce

ss to

this

poo

l unt

il/un

less

a fu

ll se

rvic

e co

mm

unity

cen

ter

is e

stab

lishe

d in

the

area

. T

his

pool

is th

e on

ly s

uita

ble

PP

&R

loca

tion

for w

omen

-onl

y sw

ims,

whi

ch c

urre

ntly

ser

ve a

n av

erag

e of

5 w

omen

and

girl

s ea

ch w

eek,

and

men

-onl

y sw

ims

whi

ch s

erve

an

aver

age

of 2

men

and

boy

s ea

ch w

eek .

If th

is p

ropo

sal i

s no

t app

rove

d, th

e re

sulti

ng c

losu

re o

f Buc

kman

Poo

l wou

ld e

limin

ate

the

gend

er-o

nly

swim

opp

ortu

nity

. Fur

ther

, loc

al re

side

nts

wou

ld h

ave

to e

ither

fore

go in

door

swim

min

g or

trav

el 1

-3 m

iles

to o

ther

pub

lic o

r priv

ate

pool

s in

the

city

and

one

full-

time

empl

oyee

as

wel

l as

seve

ral s

easo

nal e

mpl

oyee

s w

ould

lose

thei

r job

s.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

6 of

35

Page 77: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 73

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

19Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Adm

inis

tratio

nP

K_0

2 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Adm

inis

tratio

n M

&S

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

300,

000

300,

000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES30

0,00

030

0,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry30

0,00

030

0,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES30

0,00

030

0,00

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

PP

&R

’s G

ener

al F

und

allo

catio

n is

incr

ease

d on

an

annu

al b

asis

to a

ccou

nt fo

r inf

latio

n. T

his

prop

osal

rest

ores

the

annu

al in

flatio

n ad

just

men

t to

all m

ater

ials

and

ser

vice

s lin

e ite

ms.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

this

pro

posa

l will

allo

w th

e bu

reau

to m

aint

ain

its p

urch

asin

g po

wer

for t

he v

ario

us e

quip

men

t, to

ols,

trai

ning

, con

sulti

ng c

ontra

cts,

and

oth

er m

isce

llane

ous

need

s ov

er th

eco

urse

of a

fisc

al y

ear.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

2 of

35

Page 78: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 74 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

20Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Adm

inis

tratio

nP

K_0

4 - 1

0% A

dd B

ack

- Adm

inis

tratio

n - W

orke

rs C

omp

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

60,0

0060

,000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES60

,000

60,0

000

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry60

,000

60,0

000

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES60

,000

60,0

000

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

PP

&R

con

tribu

tes

annu

al fu

ndin

g to

a re

serv

e fu

nd to

sup

port

Wor

ker’s

Com

pens

atio

n cl

aim

s. T

his

prop

osal

rest

ores

PP

&R

wor

kers

com

pens

atio

n re

serv

es b

y $6

0,00

0.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ratio

n of

the

prop

osal

will

allo

w P

P&

R a

n ex

pand

ed re

serv

e sh

ould

wor

kers

com

pens

atio

n cl

aim

s ris

e in

futu

re y

ears

. Th

is w

ould

offs

et th

e ne

ed to

con

side

r fut

ure

year

redu

ctio

ns to

incr

ease

thes

e re

serv

es.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

4 of

35

Page 79: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 75

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mul

tiple

PK

_22

- 10%

Add

Bac

k -O

MF

Inte

rnal

Ser

vice

s

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Inte

rnal

Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

403,

274

403,

274

00

00

00

Con

tinge

ncy

(30,

361)

(30,

361)

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES37

2,91

337

2,91

30

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry37

2,91

337

2,91

30

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES37

2,91

337

2,91

30

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l res

tore

s re

duct

ions

that

hav

e be

en p

ropo

sed

from

the

Offi

ce o

f Man

agem

ent a

nd F

inan

ce a

s pa

rt of

thei

r bud

get r

eque

st.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

ere

is n

o se

rvic

e ch

ange

exp

ecte

d fro

m th

is p

ropo

sal.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

21 o

f 35

Page 80: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 76 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

01Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Com

mun

ity C

ente

rsP

K_2

3 - 1

-Tim

e - T

een

Pro

gram

min

g

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

026

3,79

40

00

00

263,

794

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

036

,206

00

00

036

,206

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES0

300,

000

00

00

030

0,00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry0

300,

000

00

00

030

0,00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES0

300,

000

00

00

030

0,00

0

FTE Li

mite

d Te

rm P

ositi

ons

3.00

0.00

3.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

TOTA

L FT

E3.

000.

003.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l con

tinue

s th

ree

Teen

Ser

vice

Coo

rdin

ator

s an

d pr

ogra

m o

pera

ting

supp

ort f

or fi

ve lo

catio

ns a

t com

mun

ity c

ente

rs th

roug

hout

the

city

. Thi

s de

dica

ted

staf

fing

leve

l will

cont

inue

for t

he 8

th c

onse

cutiv

e ye

ar to

pro

vide

saf

e an

d en

gagi

ng p

rogr

ams

and

activ

ities

for t

eens

. Thi

s w

ould

be

requ

este

d ag

ain

as o

ne-ti

me

fund

ing,

not

ong

oing

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:P

P&

R w

ill c

ontin

ue p

rovi

ding

com

mun

ity-b

ased

teen

pro

gram

min

g at

five

loca

tions

thro

ugho

ut P

ortla

nd.

The

Teen

Ser

vice

s P

rogr

am p

rovi

des

appr

oxim

atel

y 55

0 te

en s

peci

fic p

rogr

ams,

clas

ses,

and

spe

cial

eve

nts

annu

ally

in a

dditi

on to

dro

p-in

pro

gram

min

g, w

ith o

ver 9

4,00

0 vi

sits

this

pas

t fis

cal y

ear.

Con

tinua

tion

of th

e Te

en p

rogr

am h

as im

porta

nt im

plic

atio

ns fo

r ach

ievi

ng th

e go

als

outli

ned

on th

e P

ortla

nd P

lan.

Tee

n pr

ogra

ms

have

bee

n id

entif

ied

as a

spe

cific

act

ion

item

in th

eP

ortla

nd P

lan.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

22 o

f 35

Page 81: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 77

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

02Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Sum

mer

Fre

e fo

r All

PK

_24

- 1-T

ime

- Sum

mer

Lun

ch P

rogr

am

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

070

,000

00

00

070

,000

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES0

70,0

000

00

00

70,0

00

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry0

70,0

000

00

00

70,0

00TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES0

70,0

000

00

00

70,0

00

Des

crip

tion:

The

num

ber o

f chi

ldre

n qu

alify

ing

for t

he fr

ee o

r red

uced

fee

lunc

h at

sch

ool i

s at

an

all-t

ime

high

. Fo

r som

e ch

ildre

n, th

e m

eal t

hey

rece

ive

at s

choo

l is

the

only

bal

ance

d m

eal t

hey

may

get

that

day

. Onc

e sc

hool

end

s fo

r the

yea

r, P

P&

R is

the

prim

ary

prov

ider

for f

ree

lunc

h di

strib

utio

n in

Por

tland

, ser

ving

free

lunc

hes

at S

umm

er P

layg

roun

d pr

ogra

m s

ites

and

com

mun

ityce

nter

s. T

he S

umm

er P

layg

roun

d pr

ogra

m is

typi

cally

an

8-w

eek

prog

ram

from

mid

-Jun

e to

mid

-Aug

ust.

Thi

s pr

opos

al a

llow

s P

P&

R to

ext

end

the

sum

mer

lunc

h pr

ogra

m to

cov

er th

e fir

stan

d la

st w

eek

of th

e su

mm

er b

reak

and

reac

h ou

t to

mor

e si

tes

whe

re th

e ne

ed is

gre

ates

t. L

ast s

umm

er, t

he C

ity s

erve

d ov

er 1

00,0

00 lu

nche

s th

roug

h th

is p

rogr

am. T

his

wou

ld b

ere

ques

ted

agai

n as

one

-tim

e fu

ndin

g, n

ot o

ngoi

ng.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Fr

ee lu

nche

s w

ill b

e of

fere

d to

chi

ldre

n th

roug

hout

the

sum

mer

at S

umm

er P

layg

roun

d si

tes

and

com

mun

ity c

ente

rs.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

23 o

f 35

Page 82: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 78 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Sec

urity

PK

_30

- For

est P

ark

Ran

ger -

BE

S In

tera

genc

y A

gree

men

t

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

72,0

0072

,000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES72

,000

72,0

000

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry72

,000

72,0

000

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES72

,000

72,0

000

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

The

Fore

st P

ark

Ran

ger (

FPR

) pos

ition

is c

urre

ntly

fund

ed th

roug

h an

inte

rage

ncy

agre

emen

t with

the

Bur

eau

of E

nviro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces(

BE

S).

BE

S is

pro

posi

ng to

elim

inat

e fu

ndin

g fo

rth

is p

ositi

on in

FY

201

3-14

. The

FP

R e

duca

tes

park

use

rs a

nd s

uppo

rts P

P&

R a

nd o

ther

par

tner

s in

ste

war

dshi

p ef

forts

with

in th

e pa

rk, m

aint

aini

ng w

ater

shed

hea

lth a

nd w

ater

qua

lity.

Ran

ger e

fforts

in th

e pa

rk h

elp

to m

aint

ain

heal

th o

f a m

ajor

city

wat

ersh

ed th

us h

elpi

ng to

miti

gate

the

impa

cts

asso

ciat

ed w

ith s

torm

wat

er ru

n of

f. T

his

prop

osal

wou

ld re

plac

e B

ES

fund

ing

with

Gen

eral

Fun

d re

sour

ces

to s

uppo

rt th

e FP

R p

ositi

on.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:R

esto

ring

fund

s to

sup

port

the

Fore

st P

ark

Ran

ger (

FPR

) pos

ition

wou

ld m

aint

ain

the

pres

ence

of a

par

k am

bass

ador

who

wor

ks w

ith th

e co

mm

unity

and

oth

er P

P&

R re

sour

ces

to a

ssis

t in

the

prot

ectio

n of

For

est P

ark

asse

ts. T

he F

PR

wor

ks p

roac

tivel

y to

eng

age

volu

ntee

rs to

edu

cate

par

k us

ers

and

supp

ort P

P&

R a

nd o

ther

par

tner

s in

ste

war

dshi

p ef

forts

with

in th

e pa

rk.

The

FPR

’s p

rimar

y ro

le is

to e

duca

te v

isito

rs a

bout

par

k et

ique

tte a

nd in

vest

igat

e pa

rk c

once

rns.

The

FP

R lo

oks

into

con

cern

s of

sta

ff, p

artn

ers,

par

k us

ers

and

neig

hbor

s re

gard

ing

off-l

eash

dog

beh

avio

r, ill

egal

cam

ps a

nd m

isus

e to

the

park

. Th

e FP

R a

ddre

sses

par

k co

ncer

ns a

s w

ell t

o pr

ovid

es tr

aini

ng to

vol

unte

ers

and

supp

orts

the

wor

k of

the

Fore

st P

ark

Foot

Pat

rol.

The

Foot

Pat

rol w

orks

clo

sely

with

the

FPR

and

oth

er P

P&

R s

taff

to e

ngag

e an

d ed

ucat

e th

e pu

blic

on

the

prop

er u

se o

f For

est P

ark

trails

and

nat

ural

are

as.

In a

dditi

on, t

his

posi

tion

enfo

rces

par

k ru

les

(dog

s of

f lea

sh, t

rail

use,

cam

ping

), tra

cks

and

post

s ill

egal

cam

p gr

ound

s an

d no

tifie

s ap

prop

riate

aut

horit

ies

and

reso

urce

s to

dea

l with

vio

lato

rsan

d cl

ean-

up.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

29 o

f 35

Page 83: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 79

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Nat

ural

Are

as M

aint

enan

ceP

K_3

1 - P

rote

ct th

e B

est -

BE

S In

tera

genc

y A

gree

men

t

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

171,

010

171,

010

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

78,9

9078

,990

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES25

0,00

025

0,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry25

0,00

025

0,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES25

0,00

025

0,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

003.

003.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

3.00

3.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

The

Pro

tect

the

Bes

t pro

gram

is c

urre

ntly

fund

ed th

roug

h an

inte

rage

ncy

agre

emen

t with

the

Bur

eau

of E

nviro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces(

BE

S).

BE

S is

pro

posi

ng to

elim

inat

e fu

ndin

g fo

r thi

spr

ogra

m in

FY

201

3-14

. The

pro

gram

is a

n in

tegr

al p

art o

f the

City

’s In

vasi

ve S

peci

es P

rogr

am fo

cusi

ng o

n m

aint

aini

ng th

e ec

olog

ical

hea

lth a

nd s

torm

wat

er p

roce

ssin

g ca

paci

ty o

fC

ity-o

wne

d he

alth

y na

tura

l are

as.

This

pro

posa

l wou

ld re

plac

e B

ES

fund

ing

with

Gen

eral

Fun

d re

sour

ces

to s

uppo

rt th

e P

rote

ct th

e B

est P

rogr

am.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:P

P&

R C

ity N

atur

e ow

ns a

nd m

anag

es e

colo

gica

lly h

ealth

y ha

bita

t tha

t sup

ports

wild

life

and

prov

ides

uni

que

oppo

rtuni

ties

for e

xper

ienc

ing

natu

re lo

cally

. The

PtB

pro

gram

inve

sts

reso

urce

sin

to m

aint

aini

ng h

ealth

y ha

bita

ts in

thei

r cur

rent

con

ditio

n, ra

ther

than

letti

ng th

em b

e in

vade

d by

exp

ensi

ve-to

-trea

t inv

asiv

e w

eeds

. Th

is p

rogr

am is

des

igne

d to

pre

vent

ear

ly-s

tage

inva

sive

infe

stat

ions

in P

P&

R’s

eco

logi

cally

hea

lthy

natu

ral a

reas

by

iden

tifyi

ng “c

ore

habi

tat”

and

then

cre

atin

g in

vasi

ve-fr

ee “b

uffe

r hab

itat”

surr

ound

ing

it, re

duci

ng th

e ch

ance

of r

ein

fest

atio

n. W

ork

site

s ar

e se

lect

ed b

ased

prim

arily

on

the

ecol

ogic

al h

ealth

ratin

g as

sign

ed in

the

PP

&R

veg

etat

ion

surv

ey (2

003-

04).

PTB

sta

ff re

mov

es E

nglis

h iv

y, E

nglis

h ho

lly,

Him

alay

an b

lack

berr

y, g

arlic

mus

tard

, and

oth

er in

vasi

ve s

peci

es u

sing

han

d to

ols,

cha

insa

ws,

and

her

bici

des.

Tre

atm

ents

are

trac

ked

with

GP

S a

nd a

n A

rc G

IS D

atab

ase.

Sin

ce th

epr

ogra

m b

egan

in 2

007,

ove

r 2,3

00 a

cres

hav

e be

en tr

eate

d in

num

erou

s pa

rks

incl

udin

g Fo

rest

Par

k, P

owel

l But

te, B

utte

s N

atur

al A

rea,

Mar

icar

a P

ark,

and

Elk

Roc

k Is

land

. Th

e co

st o

fre

stor

atio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce in

PP

&R

’s n

atur

al a

reas

is e

xpec

ted

to d

eclin

e as

the

heal

th o

f our

nat

ural

are

as c

ontin

ues

in a

pos

itive

hea

lth tr

ajec

tory

.

With

out f

undi

ng to

rest

ore

the

PtB

pro

gram

, the

pos

itive

tren

d w

e ha

ve a

chie

ved

over

the

past

5 y

ears

will

be

reve

rsed

. C

ontin

uatio

n of

the

PtP

pro

gram

has

impo

rtant

impl

icat

ions

for

achi

evin

g th

e go

als

outli

ned

on th

e re

cent

Por

tland

Pla

n. I

nvas

ive

wee

d re

mov

al h

as b

een

iden

tifie

d as

act

ion

item

in th

e P

ortla

nd P

lan.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

30 o

f 35

Page 84: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 80 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Nat

ural

Are

as M

aint

enan

ceP

K_3

2 - Y

outh

Con

serv

atio

n C

rew

- B

ES

Inte

rage

ncy

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

122,

500

122,

500

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

52,5

0052

,500

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES17

5,00

017

5,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry17

5,00

017

5,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES17

5,00

017

5,00

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

The

You

th C

onse

rvat

ion

Cre

w p

rogr

am is

cur

rent

ly fu

nded

thro

ugh

an in

tera

genc

y ag

reem

ent w

ith th

e B

urea

u of

Env

ironm

enta

l Ser

vice

s(B

ES

). B

ES

is p

ropo

sing

to e

limin

ate

fund

ing

for

this

pro

gram

in F

Y 2

013-

14. T

he p

rogr

am p

rovi

des

oppo

rtuni

ties

and

job

train

ing

for a

div

erse

pop

ulat

ion

of 5

0-60

Por

tland

-are

a yo

uth,

age

s 14

-18

prov

idin

g m

aint

enan

ce fo

r nat

ural

are

asan

d P

ortla

nd’s

tree

can

opy.

Tre

e an

d na

tura

l are

a m

aint

enan

ce h

elp

man

age

the

City

’s w

ater

shed

s an

d m

anag

e st

orm

wat

er ru

noff,

whi

le in

trodu

cing

a n

ew g

ener

atio

n to

the

wor

kfor

ce.

This

pro

posa

l wou

ld re

plac

e B

ES

fund

ing

with

Gen

eral

Fun

d re

sour

ces

to s

uppo

rt th

e Y

outh

Con

serv

atio

n C

rew

pro

gram

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

e Y

outh

Con

serv

atio

n C

rew

(YC

C) p

rogr

am p

rovi

des

paid

em

ploy

men

t opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r a d

iver

se p

opul

atio

n of

Por

tland

-are

a yo

uth,

age

s 14

-18.

Cre

ws

prot

ect,

rest

ore,

and

man

age

Por

tland

's p

arks

and

nat

ural

are

as w

hile

dev

elop

ing

esse

ntia

l job

ski

lls. E

very

sum

mer

, YC

C e

mpl

oys

betw

een

50-6

0 te

ens.

With

in P

ortla

nd P

arks

& R

ecre

atio

n (P

P&

R),

and

envi

ronm

enta

lfie

lds

in g

ener

al, t

here

is a

lack

of d

iver

sity

in th

e w

orkf

orce

. At t

he s

ame

time,

it is

an

agin

g w

orkf

orce

and

ther

e is

not

a d

iver

se p

ool o

f tra

ined

, kno

wle

dgea

ble,

pas

sion

ate

youn

g pe

ople

tofil

l the

gap

. Th

e Y

CC

aim

s to

incr

ease

the

dive

rsity

of t

he C

ity o

f Por

tland

’s w

orkf

orce

and

ass

ist t

eens

in d

evel

opin

g us

eful

wor

k sk

ills

and

habi

ts. P

artic

ipan

ts h

ave

oppo

rtuni

ties

to q

ualif

yfo

r fut

ure

jobs

in P

P&

R a

nd o

ther

City

age

ncie

s an

d w

ill b

uild

the

next

gen

erat

ion

of s

uppo

rt fo

r par

ks a

nd n

atur

al a

reas

am

ong

Por

tland

’s n

ext g

ener

atio

n.R

esto

ratio

n of

fund

ing

for t

he Y

CC

will

mai

ntai

n su

ppor

t for

a p

rogr

am th

at ta

rget

s re

crui

tmen

t fro

m 7

5% F

ree

& R

educ

ed L

unch

sch

ools

in P

ortla

nd, b

ut n

ot e

xclu

sive

ly. T

eens

ent

er th

epr

ogra

m th

roug

h pa

st a

nd c

urre

nt p

artn

ersh

ips

with

the

Offi

ce o

f You

th V

iole

nce

Pre

vent

ion,

Cat

holic

Cha

ritie

s, S

E W

orks

, NA

YA

, and

refe

rral

s fro

m s

choo

l cou

nsel

ors.

Oth

er te

ens

have

volu

ntee

red

with

oth

er P

P&

R p

rogr

ams

incl

udin

g th

e N

o Iv

y Le

ague

and

Gre

ensp

aces

Res

tora

tion

& U

rban

Nat

ural

ist T

eam

(GR

UN

T).

Con

tinua

tion

of th

e Y

CC

pro

gram

has

impo

rtant

impl

icat

ions

for a

chie

ving

the

goal

s ou

tline

d on

the

rece

nt P

ortla

nd P

lan.

Tee

n pr

ogra

ms

have

bee

n id

entif

ied

as a

n ac

tion

item

in th

eP

ortla

nd P

lan.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

31 o

f 35

Page 85: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 81

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Nat

ural

Are

as M

aint

PK

_33

- Will

amet

te R

iver

Ste

war

dshi

p - B

ES

Inte

rage

ncy

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

90,5

1090

,510

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

42,2

6842

,268

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES13

2,77

813

2,77

80

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry13

2,77

813

2,77

80

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES13

2,77

813

2,77

80

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

The

Will

amet

te R

iver

Ste

war

dshi

p po

sitio

n is

cur

rent

ly fu

nded

thro

ugh

an in

tera

genc

y ag

reem

ent w

ith th

e B

urea

u of

Env

ironm

enta

l Ser

vice

s(B

ES

). B

ES

is p

ropo

sing

to e

limin

ate

fund

ing

for

this

pos

ition

in F

Y 2

013-

14. T

he p

rogr

am c

ontri

bute

s to

mai

ntai

ning

the

heal

th o

f nat

ural

are

a la

nds

that

dra

in d

irect

ly in

to th

e W

illam

ette

Riv

er, p

rote

ctin

g w

ater

qua

lity

and

redu

cing

stor

mw

ater

impa

cts.

Thi

s pr

opos

al w

ould

repl

ace

BE

S fu

ndin

g w

ith G

ener

al F

und

reso

urce

s to

sup

port

the

posi

tion.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

e W

illam

ette

Riv

er s

tew

ards

hip

coor

dina

tor i

s re

spon

sibl

e fo

r vol

unte

er e

duca

tion,

recr

uitm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t; m

ater

ials

pro

cure

men

t; an

d th

e ex

ecut

ion

of a

ll re

stor

atio

n pr

ojec

tsin

volv

ing

volu

ntee

rs in

all

natu

ral a

rea

park

s ad

jace

nt to

the

Will

amet

te R

iver

. Vol

unte

ers

man

aged

by

the

stew

ards

hip

coor

dina

tor i

nclu

de p

ublic

and

priv

ate

scho

ol s

tude

nts

of a

ll le

vels

,pr

ivat

e co

mpa

ny e

mpl

oyee

gro

ups,

non

-pro

fit o

rgan

izat

ion

mem

bers

, com

mun

ities

of f

aith

, and

indi

vidu

al c

itize

ns th

roug

hout

the

city

. Las

t yea

r, th

e co

ordi

nato

r wor

ked

with

3,9

42 v

olun

teer

sw

ho g

ave

near

ly 1

1,00

0 ho

urs

of th

eir t

ime.

Pro

ject

s co

mpl

eted

by

volu

ntee

rs a

dded

alm

ost 9

,000

nat

ive

plan

ts to

the

city

land

scap

e an

d re

mov

ed 7

5 cu

bic

yard

s of

tras

h th

roug

h m

ultip

l evo

lunt

eer r

esto

ratio

n ev

ents

eac

h. V

olun

teer

s al

so m

anua

lly re

mov

e an

d m

onito

r sev

eral

acr

es o

f inv

asiv

e sp

ecie

s ea

ch y

ear a

nd w

ater

new

ly p

lant

ed p

lant

s th

roug

h th

e dr

y su

mm

erm

onth

s. C

omm

unity

ste

war

dshi

p an

d vo

lunt

eeris

m is

stro

ng a

nd g

row

ing

in th

ese

Will

amet

te R

iver

wat

ersh

ed p

arks

. Th

e nu

mbe

r of v

olun

teer

s, v

olun

teer

wor

k pa

rties

, and

nat

ive

plan

tsin

stal

led

in th

e pa

rks

cont

inue

s to

incr

ease

ann

ually

.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

32 o

f 35

Page 86: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 82 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Tree

Mai

nten

ance

PK

_34

- Dut

ch E

lm In

ocul

ant -

BE

S In

tera

genc

y A

gree

men

t

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

62,5

0062

,500

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES62

,500

62,5

000

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry62

,500

62,5

000

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES62

,500

62,5

000

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

The

Dut

ch E

lm D

isea

se in

ocul

ant i

s cu

rren

tly fu

nded

thro

ugh

an in

tera

genc

y ag

reem

ent w

ith th

e B

urea

u of

Env

ironm

enta

l Ser

vice

s(B

ES

). B

ES

is p

ropo

sing

to e

limin

ate

fund

ing

for t

his

inFY

201

3-14

. The

inoc

ulan

t “A

rbot

ech”

is

used

to re

duce

Dut

ch E

lm D

isea

se in

fect

ion

and

mor

talit

y of

Am

eric

an e

lm tr

ees

(U. a

mer

ican

a); e

.g.,

in th

e P

ark

Blo

cks.

Elm

s m

ake

up a

vis

ible

porti

on o

f Por

tland

’s m

atur

e fo

rest

can

opy,

impr

ovin

g st

orm

wat

er m

anag

emen

t and

air

qual

ity. T

his

prop

osal

wou

ld re

plac

e B

ES

fund

ing

with

Gen

eral

Fun

d re

sour

ces

to s

uppo

rt th

etre

atm

ent f

or D

utch

Elm

Dis

ease

.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:W

ithou

t fun

ding

for t

his

prog

ram

PP

&R

will

no

long

er s

uppo

rt th

e pr

even

tativ

e ca

re o

f the

city

’s E

lm T

rees

. Th

is c

ould

lead

to th

e fo

llow

ing:

1)P

oten

tial m

orta

lity

of u

p to

450

Ulm

us a

mer

ican

a tre

es d

ue to

lack

of i

nocu

latio

n2)

Pub

lic c

once

rn a

bout

ces

satio

n of

U a

mer

ican

a in

ocul

atio

n3)

Cha

nge

in th

e ch

arac

ter o

f are

as li

ke th

e P

ark

Blo

cks

– lo

ss o

f lar

ge c

anop

y tre

es w

hich

can

not b

e

com

para

bly

repl

aced

for a

bout

30

year

s4)

Pro

perty

ow

ners

rem

ovin

g D

ED

-infe

cted

stre

et tr

ees,

incl

udin

g co

ntam

inat

ed w

ood

disp

osal

and

stu

mp

grin

ding

. P

er tr

ee re

mov

al c

ost t

o pr

oper

ty o

wne

rs ty

pica

lly a

vera

ges

$4,0

00 $

7,00

0, d

epen

ding

on

tree

size

,

c

ondi

tion,

and

site

cha

ract

eris

tics.

5)P

P&

R, a

s pe

r City

Cod

e 20

.40.

205,

pro

vide

s fo

r “st

ipen

d” p

aym

ent w

hen

an e

lder

ly a

djac

ent p

rope

rty o

wne

r

h

as li

mite

d in

com

e fo

r stre

et tr

ee re

mov

al. T

his

is c

urre

ntly

fund

edfro

m th

e Tr

ee D

amag

e R

ecov

ery

Trus

t Fun

d.

M

ore

dem

ands

on

thes

e st

ipen

ds a

re e

xpec

ted,

whi

ch w

ill re

duce

the

trust

fund

.

W

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

33 o

f 35

Page 87: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 83

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Tree

Mai

nten

ance

PK

_35

- Tre

e In

spec

tor -

BE

S In

tera

genc

y A

gree

men

t

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

81,0

0081

,000

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES81

,000

81,0

000

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry81

,000

81,0

000

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES81

,000

81,0

000

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

A T

ree

Insp

ecto

r pos

ition

is c

urre

ntly

fund

ed th

roug

h an

inte

rage

ncy

agre

emen

t with

the

Bur

eau

of E

nviro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces(

BE

S).

BE

S is

pro

posi

ng to

elim

inat

e fu

ndin

g fo

r thi

s po

sitio

n in

FY 2

013-

14. A

s th

e po

sitio

n is

cur

rent

ly v

acan

t, th

e fu

ndin

g ha

s be

en u

sed

to s

uppo

rt tre

e pe

rmit

inta

ke a

nd tr

ee in

spec

tion

serv

ices

whi

ch h

elp

mai

ntai

n P

ortla

nd’s

urb

an c

anop

y, a

nim

porta

nt e

lem

ent i

n m

anag

ing

stor

m w

ater

runo

ff in

nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds.

This

pro

posa

l wou

ld re

plac

e B

ES

fund

ing

with

Gen

eral

Fun

d re

sour

ces

to s

uppo

rt th

e Tr

ee In

spec

tor p

ositi

on.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

: T

he T

ree

Insp

ecto

r pos

ition

is p

rese

ntly

vac

ant;

how

ever

, the

bud

get f

or th

e po

sitio

n is

cur

rent

ly fu

ndin

g se

ason

al s

taff

who

cov

er U

rban

For

estry

Inta

ke d

utie

s an

d tre

e pe

rmitt

ing

supp

ort

incl

udin

g tre

e re

gula

tion

com

plia

nce

chec

ks, w

eb s

ite d

evel

opm

ent a

nd m

aint

enan

ce, H

erita

ge T

ree

docu

men

tatio

n, a

nd d

ata

proc

essi

ng.

If fu

ndin

g fo

r the

se fu

nctio

ns is

not

rest

ored

thes

edu

ties

will

be

forg

one,

or d

elay

ed a

nd a

bsor

bed

in s

ome

redu

ced

form

by

othe

r exi

stin

g st

aff.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

34 o

f 35

Page 88: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 84 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Tree

Mai

nten

ance

PK

_36

- Edu

catio

n an

d O

utre

ach

- BE

S In

tera

genc

y

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Per

sonn

el S

ervi

ces

84,1

3684

,136

00

00

00

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

37,8

6437

,864

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES12

2,00

012

2,00

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry12

2,00

012

2,00

00

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES12

2,00

012

2,00

00

00

00

0

FTE Fu

ll-Ti

me

Pos

ition

s0.

001.

001.

000.

000.

000.

000.

000.

00TO

TAL

FTE

0.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Des

crip

tion:

An

Urb

an F

ores

try E

duca

tion

and

Out

reac

h po

sitio

n is

cur

rent

ly fu

nded

thro

ugh

an in

tera

genc

y ag

reem

ent w

ith th

e B

urea

u of

Env

ironm

enta

l Ser

vice

s(B

ES

). B

ES

is p

ropo

sing

to e

limin

ate

fund

ing

for t

his

posi

tion

in F

Y 2

013-

14. T

his

posi

tion

curr

ently

sta

ffs o

utre

ach

even

ts, p

ublic

tree

car

e w

orks

hops

, and

sch

ool t

ree-

plan

ting

even

ts, l

eadi

ng to

incr

ease

d tre

e ca

nopy

am

ong

all p

arts

of t

he C

ity. I

ncre

ased

tree

can

opy

help

s m

anag

e st

orm

wat

er a

nd b

uild

s he

alth

ier n

eigh

borh

oods

. Thi

s pr

opos

al w

ould

repl

ace

BE

S fu

ndin

g w

ith G

ener

al F

und

reso

urce

s to

sup

port

the

Edu

catio

n an

d O

utre

ach

posi

tion.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:If

fund

ing

is n

ot re

stor

ed fo

r thi

s po

sitio

n it

will

resu

lt in

the

follo

win

g:

1)R

educ

ed s

taff

supp

ort f

or th

e U

rban

For

estry

Com

mis

sion

Edu

catio

n an

d O

utre

ach

(E&

O) C

omm

ittee

,.2)

Elim

inat

ion

of P

P&

R U

F st

aff r

epre

sent

atio

n at

app

roxi

mat

ely

outre

ach

even

ts fr

ee p

ublic

tree

car

e w

orks

hops

3)R

educ

e “L

earn

ing

Land

scap

es” s

choo

l tre

e pl

antin

gs fr

om 6

/ yea

r to

4/ y

ear.

I

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

35 o

f 35

Page 89: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 85

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

PK

_25

- O&

M R

eque

sts

for A

cqui

sitio

ns &

Impr

ovem

ents

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

674,

401

718,

586

00

00

044

,185

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES67

4,40

171

8,58

60

00

00

44,1

85

REV

ENU

ESG

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry67

4,40

171

8,58

60

00

00

44,1

85TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES67

4,40

171

8,58

60

00

00

44,1

85

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l will

add

ress

ong

oing

Ope

ratio

ns a

nd M

aint

enan

ce (O

&M

) req

uire

men

ts o

f $58

6,20

5 fo

r new

ly a

cqui

red

or d

evel

oped

pro

perti

es th

at w

ere

plac

ed in

to s

ervi

ce d

urin

g FY

2012

-13.

An

addi

tiona

l $43

,353

of o

ne-ti

me

fund

s ha

ve b

een

allo

cate

d to

add

ress

site

spe

cific

sta

biliz

atio

n co

sts

that

hav

e be

en p

ut o

ff un

til F

Y 2

013-

14. P

er g

uida

nce

from

the

Bud

get

Offi

ce, t

his

pack

age

also

refle

cts

larg

e pr

ojec

ts w

ith $

25,0

00 o

r mor

e of

est

imat

ed O

&M

for F

Y 2

013-

14 th

at h

aven

’t be

en p

lace

d in

to s

ervi

ce y

et. T

hose

incl

ude

a to

tal o

f $89

,028

of n

ewO

&M

nee

ded

for D

awso

n P

ark

Impr

ovem

ents

and

Riv

ervi

ew N

atur

al A

rea

acqu

isiti

on.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:

This

pro

posa

l allo

ws

PP

&R

to a

dequ

atel

y m

anag

e O

pera

tions

and

Mai

nten

ance

requ

irem

ents

ass

ocia

ted

with

new

pro

perty

acq

uisi

tions

. To

tal a

mou

nt re

ques

ted

is a

s fo

llow

s:

FY 2

012-

13To

tal o

ngoi

ng: $

586,

205

Tota

l one

-tim

e: $

43,3

53To

tal R

eque

st F

Y 2

012/

13: $

629,

558

FY 2

013-

14

To

tal o

ngoi

ng:

$88,

196

Tota

l one

-tim

e: $

832

Tota

l Req

uest

FY

201

3/14

: $89

,028

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

24 o

f 35

Page 90: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 86 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

01Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Larg

e C

omm

unity

Cen

ters

PK

_26

- Lar

ge C

omm

unity

Cen

ter A

dmis

sion

Pas

s Fe

es

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

EXPE

ND

ITU

RES

Ext

erna

l Mat

eria

ls a

nd S

ervi

ces

00

00

00

00

TOTA

L EX

PEN

DIT

UR

ES0

00

00

00

0

REV

ENU

ESC

harg

es fo

r Ser

vice

s20

4,40

020

4,40

00

00

00

0G

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry(2

04,4

00)

(204

,400

)0

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES0

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l inc

reas

es d

aily

adm

issi

on fe

es b

y ap

prox

imat

ely

50¢

and

corr

elat

ing

mem

bers

hip

pass

fees

at a

ll fiv

e la

rge

com

mun

ity c

ente

rs.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:P

P&

R fe

es fo

r dro

p-in

act

iviti

es a

t the

se lo

catio

ns h

ave

unde

rgon

e ch

ange

s in

the

past

yea

r as

we

have

alig

ned

the

fee

setti

ng m

etho

dolo

gy.

Whi

le w

e ha

ve c

ontin

ued

to s

ee in

crea

sed

parti

cipa

tion

over

all,

in s

ome

neig

hbor

hood

s, w

e ar

e ap

proa

chin

g pr

ivat

e se

ctor

fitn

ess

faci

lity

rate

s, a

nd th

at m

ay w

eake

n ou

r abi

lity

to re

tain

exi

stin

g an

d at

tract

new

cus

tom

ers.

Des

pite

rece

nt p

rice

incr

ease

s, c

ity re

side

nt a

nd c

usto

mer

spe

cific

sur

veys

hav

e no

t sho

wn

a de

clin

e in

sat

isfa

ctio

n le

vels

with

PP

&R

pric

ing.

Ana

lysi

s re

veal

s th

at a

fter a

201

2 pr

ice

incr

ease

, pas

s re

venu

es a

nd p

eopl

e se

rved

incr

ease

d by

wel

l ove

r 50%

, but

dai

ly d

rop

in s

ales

onl

y in

crea

sed

by 1

2% o

vera

ll w

ith a

dec

reas

e at

Cha

rles

Jord

an a

nd M

att D

ishm

anC

omm

unity

Cen

ters

. Thi

s in

dica

tes

that

a n

ew p

rice

incr

ease

may

not

redu

ce o

vera

ll re

venu

e an

d pa

rtici

patio

n, b

ut it

may

affe

ct o

ur m

ost v

ulne

rabl

e cu

stom

ers.

Our

sch

olar

ship

pol

icy

may

be a

ble

to m

itiga

te th

is a

ffect

.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

25 o

f 35

Page 91: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 87

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

02Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mul

tiple

PK

_27

- Non

-Res

iden

t Fee

s

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

REV

ENU

ESC

harg

es fo

r Ser

vice

s25

,000

25,0

000

00

00

0G

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry(2

5,00

0)(2

5,00

0)0

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES0

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

The

purp

ose

of th

is p

ropo

sal i

s to

bet

ter e

nsur

e th

at n

on-r

esid

ents

are

pay

ing

fees

equ

ival

ent t

o w

hat C

ity o

f Por

tland

(CO

P) r

esid

ents

are

pay

ing

thro

ugh

fees

and

taxe

s.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:N

on-r

esid

ent c

usto

mer

s w

ho a

re h

igh-

volu

me

user

s of

PP

&R

recr

eatio

n pr

ogra

ms

will

exp

erie

nce

little

impa

ct m

ay a

ctua

lly p

ay le

ss. N

on-r

esid

ents

who

are

low

-vol

ume

user

s m

ayex

perie

nce

a hi

gher

impa

ct; t

hese

use

rs m

ay d

ecid

e to

avo

id th

e co

st a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e re

side

ncy

pass

by

seek

ing

othe

r non

–pro

fit, p

rivat

e, o

r pub

lic p

rovi

ders

. D

epen

ding

on

the

spec

ific

serv

ice,

ther

e m

ay b

e su

bstit

utes

ava

ilabl

e. In

som

e ca

ses,

resi

dent

s of

oth

er n

earb

y ju

risdi

ctio

ns w

ho h

ave

little

or n

o ac

cess

to p

ublic

recr

eatio

n se

rvic

es o

ther

wis

e, w

ill s

till c

ontin

ue to

choo

se P

P&

R.

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

26 o

f 35

Page 92: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 88 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

03Ty

pe:

Bur

eau

Add

s

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Aqu

atic

sP

K_2

8 - S

wim

Les

son

Fees

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

REV

ENU

ESC

harg

es fo

r Ser

vice

s15

0,00

015

0,00

00

00

00

0G

ener

al F

und

Dis

cret

iona

ry(1

50,0

00)

(150

,000

)0

00

00

0TO

TAL

REV

ENU

ES0

00

00

00

0

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l inc

reas

es p

rices

for P

P&

R s

wim

less

ons

whi

le s

till m

aint

aini

ng a

fford

abili

ty.

Pric

es fo

r you

th s

wim

less

ons

will

incr

ease

by

$5.0

0 fro

m $

47.5

0 to

$52

.50,

pric

es fo

r adu

ltle

sson

s w

ill in

crea

se b

y $1

0.00

, and

the

pric

e fo

r sem

i-priv

ate

swim

less

ons

will

incr

ease

by

$20.

00.

The

reve

nue

rais

ed b

y th

is p

acka

ge is

alm

ost e

ntire

ly (9

7%) f

rom

you

th s

wim

less

ons.

Eve

n w

ith a

$5.

00 in

crea

se in

you

th le

sson

s, P

P&

R w

ill s

till r

emai

n am

ong

the

mos

t affo

rdab

le in

com

paris

on to

nea

rby

prov

ider

s of

sw

im le

sson

s:TH

PR

D -

$55.

00 fo

r a 1

0, 3

0-m

inut

e yo

uth

swim

less

ons

Van

couv

er/C

lark

Firs

tenb

urg

Com

mun

ity C

ente

r - $

63.0

0 fo

r 8, 3

0-m

inut

e le

sson

s

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

e pr

opos

ed c

hang

e w

ill re

sult

in a

n in

crea

se in

pric

es fo

r PP

&R

cus

tom

ers.

A 1

0-se

ssio

n sw

im le

sson

cou

rse

will

incr

ease

to $

52.5

0 fro

m a

pric

e of

$37

.00

in 2

007.

Alth

ough

the

pric

e of

swim

less

ons

have

incr

ease

d su

bsta

ntia

lly in

the

past

six

yea

rs, p

artic

ipat

ion

has

cont

inue

d to

slig

htly

incr

ease

. A

n in

crea

se in

the

pric

e of

sw

im le

sson

s co

uld

pote

ntia

lly re

sult

in a

gre

ater

dem

and

for s

chol

arsh

ip a

ssis

tanc

e.Fe

e in

crea

ses

may

als

o cr

eate

fina

ncia

l bar

riers

to p

artic

ipat

ion

for s

ome

patro

ns, w

hich

our

sch

olar

ship

pol

icy

will

be

able

to h

elp

miti

gate

but

not

nec

essa

rily

reso

lve.

In a

dditi

on, P

P&

R w

illco

ntin

ue to

offe

r a w

eek

of fr

ee s

wim

less

ons

durin

g th

e fir

st w

eek

of s

umm

er a

t all

pool

s. F

urth

er, f

ree

swim

less

ons

are

offe

red

at s

elec

ted

pool

s du

ring

win

ter a

nd s

prin

g br

eaks

.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

27 o

f 35

Page 93: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 89

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

3-14

FY 2

013-

14FY

201

4-15

Req

uest

edR

eque

sted

Req

uest

edEs

timat

edFY

201

5-16

FY 2

016-

17FY

201

7-18

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

Estim

ated

1 Ti

me

DP

Ong

oing

DP

Tota

l DP

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bud

get

Bur

eau:

Dec

isio

n Pa

ckag

e Su

mm

ary

Prio

rity:

Type

:B

urea

u A

dds

Prog

ram

:D

ecis

ion

Pack

age:

Mul

tiple

City

Nat

ure

PK

_29

- Mis

cella

neou

s Fe

es

Por

tland

Par

ks &

Rec

reat

ion

REV

ENU

ESLi

cens

es &

Per

mits

25,8

9525

,895

00

00

00

Cha

rges

for S

ervi

ces

67,0

5367

,053

00

00

00

Gen

eral

Fun

d D

iscr

etio

nary

(92,

948)

(92,

948)

00

00

00

TOTA

L R

EVEN

UES

00

00

00

00

Des

crip

tion:

This

pro

posa

l inc

reas

es th

e fo

llow

ing

min

or fe

es:

City

Nat

ure

Urb

an F

ores

try tr

ee p

erm

it fe

esP

P&

R p

arks

usa

ge fo

r con

cess

ions

, spo

rts, p

icni

cs, w

eddi

ngs,

com

mun

ity g

arde

ns, s

peci

al u

se, e

tc.

Est

ablis

hes

a fe

e fo

r PP

&R

revi

ew o

f dev

elop

men

t per

mits

, sim

ilar t

o ot

her b

urea

us’ (

Wat

er, F

ire, B

ES

, PB

OT)

exi

stin

g fe

es.

Expe

cted

Res

ults

:Th

e fe

e in

crea

ses

may

cau

se s

ome

cust

omer

s to

forg

o th

e se

rvic

e or

con

side

r a s

ubst

itute

. Th

e fe

e in

crea

ses

plan

ned

in th

is p

acka

ge a

re re

lativ

ely

min

or a

nd a

re n

ot e

xpec

ted

to h

ave

ala

rge

serv

ice

impa

ct.

T

2/1/

13 1

6:47

sap_

b_dp

_sum

mar

yP

age

28 o

f 35

Page 94: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 90 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 95: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 91

AccountClass MOC Description Account Code Account Description

FY 2006-07 Actuals

FY 2007-08 Actuals

FY 2008-09 Actuals

FY 2009-10 Actuals

FY 2010-11 Actuals

FY 2011-12 Actuals

AdoptedBudget FY 2012-13

Less One Time GF Disc FY 2012-13

Adopted for ForecastingFY 2012-13

FY 2013-14 Inflation

ForecastFY 2013-14

FY 2014-15 Inflation

ForecastFY 2014-15

FY 2015-16 Inflation

ForecastFY 2015-16

FY 2016-17 Inflation

ForecastFY 2016-17

FY 2017-18 Inflation

ForecastFY 2017-18

Future General Fund ForecastTAXES 411100 PROPERTY TAXES 2.61% 21,618,714 3.50% 22,375,371 3.66% 23,194,315 3.67% 24,045,542 3.98% 25,002,562

414000 TRANSIENT LODGING TAXES 0.27% 4,558,537 7.18% 4,885,845 3.61% 5,062,234 3.98% 5,263,708 4.31% 5,490,577LICENSES AND PERMITS 421100 BUSINESS LICENSES 5.93% 8,691,818 9.62% 9,527,968 6.64% 10,160,631 4.01% 10,568,077 3.25% 10,911,538

425100 PUBLIC UTILITY LICENSES 3.88% 6,409,915 4.53% 6,700,287 4.46% 6,999,126 3.17% 7,221,000 -1.42% 7,118,467MISCELLANEOUS 489031 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS -11.88% 1,900,024 -7.67% 1,754,295 1.28% 1,776,752 2.52% 1,821,526 10.15% 2,006,406

Future General Fund Forecast Total 0 43,179,008 0 45,243,766 0 47,193,058 0 48,919,853 0 50,529,550Projected Shortfall based on projected PP&R Share of Ongoing GF Discretionary Funds (1,870,349) (1,115,071) (1,450,635) (1,462,306) (1,361,701)

AccountClass MOC Description Account Code Account Description

FY 2006-07 Actuals

FY 2007-08 Actuals

FY 2008-09 Actuals

FY 2009-10 Actuals

FY 2010-11 Actuals

FY 2011-12 Actuals

AdoptedBudget FY 2012-13

Less One Time GF Disc FY 2012-13

Adopted for ForecastingFY 2012-13

FY 2013-14 Inflation

ForecastFY 2013-14

FY 2014-15 Inflation

ForecastFY 2014-15

FY 2015-16 Inflation

ForecastFY 2015-16

FY 2016-17 Inflation

ForecastFY 2016-17

FY 2017-18 Inflation

ForecastFY 2017-18

ResourcesGENERAL FUND DISCRETIONARY 487110 GENERAL FUND DISCRETIONARY ONGOING 31,378,948 35,029,322 36,890,269 41,269,528 41,575,765 41,639,385 40,900,489 40,900,489 4.50% 44,179,941 2.20% 45,149,710 4.20% 47,372,875 3.60% 49,074,735 2.20% 50,552,510

487120 GENERAL FUND DISCRETIONARY ONE-TIME 531,302 531,302 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0487150 GENERAL FUND DISC. O&M ONGOING - LEVY REPL. 456,429 787,053 831,015 851,791 873,083487160 GENERAL FUND DISCRETIONARY O&M FORECAST 4.50% 412,987 2.20% 422,074 4.20% 439,803 3.60% 455,633 2.20% 465,658

GENERAL FUND DISCRETIONARY Total 31,378,948 35,029,322 36,890,269 41,269,528 41,575,765 41,639,385 41,431,791 531,302 40,900,489 4.50% 45,049,357 2.20% 46,358,837 4.20% 48,643,693 3.60% 50,382,159 2.20% 51,891,251INTERNAL REVENUES 642201 INTERNAL REVENUES 8,901,347 7,304,784 8,220,421 2,246,645 2,781,462 2,809,500 3,667,925 3,667,925 3.00% 3,777,963 3.10% 3,895,084 3.00% 4,011,936 2.70% 4,120,263 2.60% 4,227,387

642202 PARKS LOCAL OPTION LEVY 46,845 226,282 1,270,710 933,377 906,222 949,629 771,679 771,679 334,542 23,692INTERNAL REVENUES Total 8,948,192 7,531,066 9,491,131 3,180,022 3,687,684 3,759,129 4,439,604 4,439,604 3.00% 4,112,505 3.10% 3,918,776 3.00% 4,011,936 2.70% 4,120,263 2.60% 4,227,387SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES 11,025,356 12,457,048 12,436,198 13,528,362 13,725,162 14,667,522 14,210,883 15,000 14,195,883 5.69% 15,468,253 7.55% 16,636,741 0.50% 16,719,915 1.08% 16,900,909 3.77% 17,537,473STATE SOURCES 335,067 273,959 378,492 5,112 1,572 139,000 139,000 0.00% 139,000 0.00% 139,000 0.00% 139,000 0.00% 139,000 0.00% 139,000LOCAL SOURCES 668,564 154,923 170,643 195,450 262,676 133,311 254,024 254,024 0.00% 254,024 0.00% 254,024 0.00% 254,024 0.00% 254,024 0.00% 254,024MISCELLANEOUS 2,107,351 780,839 737,319 862,866 1,105,134 1,105,134 5.69% 1,167,006 7.55% 1,253,776 0.50% 1,259,951 1.08% 1,273,391 3.77% 1,320,659

Resources Total 52,356,126 55,446,318 61,474,083 58,954,201 59,993,719 61,063,785 61,580,436 546,302 61,034,134 5.69% 66,190,145 7.55% 68,561,154 4.20% 71,028,519 3.60% 73,069,746 3.77% 75,369,794Expenses

PERSONNEL SERVICES 511100 FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES 17,182,110 18,252,436 20,604,461 20,487,799 20,319,435 20,557,295 20,544,083 75,556 20,468,527 6.09% 21,723,255 2.80% 22,329,127 2.50% 22,887,357 2.30% 23,415,415 2.30% 23,955,677511300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 6,260,781 6,853,022 7,664,956 8,748,291 8,944,553 9,215,754 8,244,569 78,500 8,166,069 6.09% 8,663,320 2.80% 8,905,891 2.50% 9,128,541 2.30% 9,338,500 2.30% 9,553,282512100 OVERTIME 164,983 184,680 185,038 219,139 150,648 224,936 102,422 102,422 6.09% 108,658 2.80% 111,701 2.50% 114,495 2.30% 117,130 2.30% 119,824513100 PREMIUM PAY 321,443 359,072 332,388 58,724 62,233 62,886 28,234 28,234 6.09% 29,945 2.80% 30,785 2.50% 31,560 2.30% 32,288 2.30% 33,029514099 BENEFITS 7,852,372 8,230,414 9,390,344514100 BENEFITS - HEALTH 4,245,395 4,522,044 4,926,242 5,341,353 46,452 5,294,901 12.00% 5,930,291 10.90% 6,576,693 8.20% 7,115,985 7.80% 7,671,036 7.80% 8,269,366514200 BENEFITS - VARIABLE WAGE DRIVEN 5,089,869 5,488,014 6,556,868 5,958,279 31,794 5,926,485 30.75% 6,820,800 2.80% 6,929,654 11.68% 7,335,177 2.30% 7,429,381 5.13% 7,681,684511198 ALL EMPLOYEES DRIFT 0.50% 196,822 0.50% 197,800 0.50% 198,784 0.50% 199,772 0.50% 200,765

PERSONNEL SERVICES Total 31,781,687 33,879,625 38,177,188 38,849,216 39,486,927 41,543,981 40,218,940 232,302 39,986,638 30.75% 43,473,091 10.90% 45,081,651 11.68% 46,811,899 7.80% 48,203,522 7.80% 49,813,627EXT. MATERIALS AND SERVICES Utilities UTILITIES 7,790 9,714 (1,362) 1,701 753

ELECTRICITY 1,058,263 1,139,882 1,200,866 1,274,302 1,326,893 1,368,439 1,387,368 1,387,368 1.00% 1,401,241 2.00% 1,429,268 2.00% 1,457,853 1.90% 1,485,554 1.90% 1,513,783WATER - SEWER 1,186,626 1,219,213 1,361,985 1,560,153 1,422,398 1,518,194 1,715,007 1,715,007 7.80% 1,848,776 8.10% 1,998,530 7.80% 2,154,419 5.50% 2,272,911 5.10% 2,388,832NATURAL GAS 753,035 776,263 836,502 682,321 687,147 674,862 669,350 669,350 10.50% 739,633 4.20% 770,696 4.50% 805,375 1.00% 813,430 2.60% 834,582GARBAGE 263,260 257,513 166,217 298,454 306,406 323,632 295,532 295,532 0.80% 297,897 5.00% 312,791 5.00% 328,431 4.10% 341,896 3.90% 355,230WASTE DISPOSAL 6,612 3,342 1,217 156 7,500 7,500 0.80% 7,560 5.00% 7,938 5.00% 8,335 4.10% 8,677 3.90% 9,016

Other External M&S 10,765,068 11,088,693 10,743,342 8,389,080 8,946,174 9,799,472 10,161,327 240,000 9,921,327 2.80% 10,663,286 2.50% 10,953,373 2.30% 11,196,256 2.30% 11,447,651 2.30% 11,718,397EXT. MATERIALS AND SERVICES Total 14,034,041 14,491,278 14,314,161 12,207,652 12,691,937 13,685,508 14,236,084 240,000 13,996,084 10.50% 14,958,393 8.10% 15,472,596 7.80% 15,950,669 5.50% 16,370,119 5.10% 16,819,840INTERNAL SERVICES 6,455,908 6,941,361 8,572,824 7,862,488 7,654,592 5,755,013 7,026,412 74,000 6,952,412 4.30% 7,243,902 3.30% 7,480,517 3.30% 7,719,433 2.80% 7,931,303 2.90% 8,158,989CAPITAL OUTAY 84,490 134,055 134,306 34,845 160,262 79,284 99,000 99,000 2.80% 101,772 2.50% 104,316 2.30% 106,715 2.30% 109,169 2.30% 111,680OTHER 275,605O&M - FUTURE FORECAST 4.50% 412,987 2.20% 422,074 4.20% 439,803 3.60% 455,633 2.20% 465,658

Expenses Total 52,356,126 55,446,318 61,474,083 58,954,201 59,993,719 61,063,785 61,580,436 546,302 61,034,134 30.75% 66,190,145 10.90% 68,561,154 11.68% 71,028,519 7.80% 73,069,746 7.80% 75,369,794

Prior Year General fund Discretionary amounts include both Ongoing and One-time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

This forecast includes a matching Target adjustment in FY 2013-14 thru FY 2017-18 for PERS expense and that PP&R share of the total (1) Projected Gap between resources and requirementsGeneral Fund Discretionary would increase by a like amount.

Beginning in FY 2010-11 the budgeting of revenues from the Parks Local Option Levy for O&M changed from prior years methods as to howthese revenues and expenses to PP&R are reported in the general fund. Instead of both revenues and expenses being shown in thefinancial reports, the basic expenses, i.e. personnel and materials and supplies are offset with a negative expenditure in order for the actualexpenses to reflected in the Parks Local Option Levy fund. The forecasted years still shows the revenue and matching expenses areincluded so that these match.

Portland Parks and Recreation Five Year Forecast - FY 2013-14 through FY 2017-18

G:\BUDGET\FY 2013-2014\Five Yr forecast for FY 1314 bud process\5 YR Fin Forecast for FY 2013-14 - version used for Bureau requested budget 5 YR Fin Forecast for FY 2013-14 - version used for Bureau requested budget

Page 96: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 92 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 97: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 93

Budget Forecast BudgetFY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18

Revenues Greens Fees 5,514,852$ 5,732,579$ 5,915,629$ 5,800,266$ 5,962,699$ 6,148,994$ 6,289,548$ 6,433,314$ 6,691,367$ Concessions 1,055,158 1,136,498 1,123,860 1,210,221 1,123,860 1,149,549 1,175,825 1,202,702 1,230,194 Driving Range 412,872 423,533 478,523 400,298 414,089 423,554 463,236 473,824 484,655 Cart Rentals 390,660 414,087 414,677 437,195 453,523 463,890 474,493 485,339 496,433 Interest on Investments 10,338 7,318 3,702 6,392 5,251 6,264 6,775 6,995 7,152 Fund Transfer 97,025 1,992 851 851 - - - - - Capital Asset Sale - 5,064 - - - - - - - Misc 31,137 25,856 7,020 3,462 7,608 4,596 4,751 4,884 5,010

Total Revenues 7,512,044 7,746,928 7,944,262 7,858,685 7,967,030 8,196,847 8,414,628 8,607,059 8,914,811

ExpensesPersonnel Services Full-time 1,568,094 1,597,294 1,608,780 1,620,271 1,664,922 1,728,189 1,762,753 1,813,344 1,861,035 Part-time/Casual 437,775 417,420 476,032 457,571 461,882 466,501 471,166 475,877 480,636 Overtime 19,740 22,691 35,018 20,708 34,668 35,196 36,082 36,991 37,924 Premium Pay 35,072 40,503 46,572 39,257 45,076 46,429 47,822 49,256 50,734 Benefits, etc 865,777 978,215 995,005 995,177 1,018,908 1,085,204 1,181,122 1,292,697 1,422,652 MMS Labor 131,870 129,399 131,795 175,546 135,986 141,491 146,151 150,971 155,958

Total Personnel Services 3,058,329 3,185,523 3,293,202 3,308,530 3,361,442 3,503,009 3,645,095 3,819,136 4,008,938

Materials & Services - External Professional Services 23,178 11,753 30,000 1,709 30,000 30,900 31,827 32,782 33,765 Utilities 189,591 201,685 214,337 213,737 187,751 194,285 201,387 205,335 210,601 Repair & Maintenance Services 45,851 37,466 70,315 46,272 52,635 54,214 55,840 57,516 59,241 Misc Services 51,342 50,921 50,000 25,608 64,690 66,631 68,630 70,688 72,809 Operating Supplies 261,947 249,642 221,896 215,000 276,849 262,633 267,657 274,062 281,288 Repair & Maintenance Supplies 184,553 111,678 245,724 190,929 216,322 222,741 229,424 236,195 243,053 Property Tax 221,033 221,792 240,946 235,933 233,280 244,078 257,269 273,048 289,301 Minor Equipment & Tools 4,067 3,315 43,000 43,318 43,000 44,290 45,619 46,987 48,397 Other 52,524 83,937 71,979 60,381 55,186 56,842 58,547 60,304 62,113 HL Clubhouse Payroll 764,410 791,350 849,500 798,992 822,695 843,262 864,344 885,953 908,101 HL Clubhouse Operating Expense 577,153 606,108 652,387 584,784 664,982 681,607 698,647 716,113 734,016 Compensation to Concessionaires 580,895 549,369 667,016 682,309 614,651 630,150 646,046 662,350 679,073

Total M&S - External 2,956,544 2,919,016 3,357,100 3,098,972 3,262,041 3,331,632 3,425,236 3,521,333 3,621,757

Internal ServicesFleet 202 394 210 245 258 680 255 619 284 162 292 107 300 852 308 966 316 377

FY 2012-13

PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATIONMunicipal Golf Program

Projected Financal Performance

ForecastActuals

Fleet 202,394 210,245 258,680 255,619 284,162 292,107 300,852 308,966 316,377 BTS 90,009 100,089 95,215 94,388 89,951 93,551 96,511 99,629 102,389 Transfer to Parks Bureau 39,296 45,564 14,881 55,460 54,675 59,306 64,085 68,993 74,034 Insurance 67,902 61,705 57,206 57,618 53,042 54,633 56,054 57,399 58,777 Other 21,495 26,638 11,326 10,643 37,948 23,584 24,195 24,805 25,433

Total Internal Services 421,097 444,241 437,308 473,728 519,778 523,181 541,696 559,792 577,010

Other Transfer to General Fund 188,054 189,528 231,096 231,096 301,424 302,931 304,446 305,968 307,498 Transfer to Golf Debt Fund 807,280 944,050 - - - - - - - Budget Pkg 35 - Revenue Transfer - - 125,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Pension Debt 139,608 148,907 165,433 165,640 186,425 211,521 232,690 247,425 262,043 Other (Tree Mitigation) - - 56,300 56,300 - - - - -

Total Other 1,134,942 1,282,485 577,829 578,036 587,849 614,452 637,136 653,393 669,541

CIP ExpensesHeron Lakes Clubhouse 125,224 336,955 198,500 174,026 - - - - -

Fleet Upgrades - - - - 125,000 125,000 125,000 25,000 25,000 Rose City Lakes - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - -

Total Other 125,224 336,955 223,500 199,026 150,000 125,000 125,000 25,000 25,000

Total Expenses 7,696,136 8,168,219 7,888,939 7,658,292 7,881,110 8,097,275 8,374,163 8,578,654 8,902,246

Net Revenue (Loss) (184,092) (421,291) 55,323 200,393 85,919 99,572 40,465 28,404 12,565

Ending Fund Balance (603000) 1,393,529 966,454 1,021,777 1,166,847 1,252,766 1,352,338 1,392,803 1,421,207 1,433,772

Youth Fund Trust Revenues - - - - - - - - -Youth Fund Trust Expenses 29,549 21,310 42,000 42,000 30,000 30,000 35,426 - -YFT Ending Fund Balance 158,736 137,426 95,426 95,426 65,426 35,426 - - -

Total 9 Hole Rounds 348,716 358,729 361,763 361,849 365,468 371,989 378,632 385,400 392,295

PORTLAND PARKS & RECREATION

Page 98: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 94 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Budget Forecast BudgetFY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2016-17

Revenues Rents and Reimbursements 1,461,260$ 1,350,101$ 1,594,792$ 1,406,068$ 1,488,908$ 1,518,476$ 1,542,717$ 1,570,084$ 1,597,862$ Concessions 115,328 149,887 125,214 154,938 159,586 165,650 168,895 173,560 178,281 Advertising 11,404 190,597 24,982 190,597 190,597 197,840 201,715 207,287 212,925 PIR Bond Revenue - - - - - - - - - Misc 166,577 67,094 73,028 22,644 22,612 22,355 22,927 23,270 23,692

Total Revenues 1,754,568 1,757,680 1,818,016 1,774,246 1,861,702 1,904,321 1,936,254 1,974,201 2,012,759

ExpensesPersonal Services Full-time 381,965 382,670 379,788 384,403 392,364 407,274 415,252 426,721 438,328 Part-time 120,688 116,009 116,314 119,155 104,268 102,700 105,528 108,120 110,640 Overtime 23,960 24,771 27,428 15,492 25,000 25,950 26,458 27,189 27,929 Premium Pay 1,551 1,800 1,958 1,944 2,041 2,119 2,160 2,220 2,280 Benefits, etc 188,124 216,305 225,429 224,592 236,094 250,462 264,930 282,922 302,991

17,821 32,897 22,000 35,901 23,750 24,653 25,589 26,562 27,571 Total Personal Services 734,109 774,451 772,917 781,486 783,517 813,157 839,918 873,734 909,738

Materials & Services - External Professional Services 1,744 20,498 100,000 94,147 75,000 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 Utilities 82,588 83,456 97,000 80,848 117,000 118,529 120,511 123,038 125,129 Repair & Maint Services 135,826 123,183 106,160 124,500 125,000 126,250 127,513 128,788 130,076 Local Match Payments - - 25,750 - - - - - - Misc Services 36,656 48,711 41,063 74,703 47,800 48,656 49,528 50,417 51,322 Operating Supplies 32,061 41,296 60,407 46,307 40,000 41,400 42,850 44,351 45,905 Repair & Maint Supplies 123,991 44,472 37,768 33,640 37,000 38,230 39,501 40,816 42,174 Facilities Operating Leases 15,809 16,267 15,809 16,267 16,283 16,772 17,275 17,793 18,327 Miscellaneous 53,127 57,758 60,000 59,506 71,590 83,886 96,903 110,681 114,001 Other 47,710 52,290 45,600 46,112 53,800 46,754 47,479 48,353 49,658

Total M&S - External 529,512 487,931 589,557 576,030 583,473 550,477 571,559 564,236 606,592

Internal Services Insurance & Claims 30,665 16,699 35,674 35,656 35,795 36,976 38,233 29,962 30,771 Fleet 7,692 13,766 13,700 13,700 13,766 13,904 14,043 14,183 14,325 BTS 21,287 19,168 19,712 17,411 16,333 16,790 17,210 17,589 17,976 Services from Parks Bureau 40,904 24,359 29,831 19,613 32,030 33,242 34,501 35,803 37,154 Other 22,611 25,700 25,338 25,827 29,253 26,372 27,041 27,667 28,298

Total Internal Services 123,160 99,691 124,255 112,205 127,177 127,285 131,028 125,204 128,524

Other Transfer to General Fund for OH 37,687 39,323 41,933 41,933 57,368 59,089 60,862 62,688 64,568

PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATIONPortland International Raceway

Projected Financial Performance

Interagency WO

ForecastFY 2012-13

Actuals

1/29/2013

, , , , , , , , , Pension Debt Expense 32,875 28,978 32,368 28,696 32,861 36,721 41,644 45,408 50,690 PIR Debt Principal 180,000 190,000 205,000 203,888 246,718 255,363 262,684 274,663 - PIR Debt Interest 93,942 82,892 71,224 67,351 29,947 24,359 16,914 9,083 - PIR CT to CIP FUND 402 60,000 - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - -

Total Other 404,504 341,193 350,525 341,869 366,894 375,532 382,104 391,843 115,258

Capital Outlay 30,000 - - - - - - - -

Total Expenses 1,821,285 1,703,266 1,837,254 1,811,590 1,861,061 1,866,451 1,924,608 1,955,016 1,760,113

Net Revenue (Loss) (66,716) 54,414 (19,238) (37,345) 641 37,870 11,646 19,184 252,646

Ending Fund Balance (604000) 611,614$ 665,155$ 644,947$ 627,810$ 628,451$ 666,321$ 677,968$ 697,152$ 949,798$

PIR Ending Fund Balance 362,849 415,702 392,182 375,045 372,686 407,556 416,202 432,387 682,033 Timing Tower Trust Ending Fund Balance 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 11,290 North Portland Trust Ending Fund Balance 237,475 238,163 241,475 241,475 244,475 247,475 250,475 253,475 256,475

1/29/2013

PORTLAND PARKS & RECREATION

Page 99: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 95

Cost of Service Fee Study

Page 100: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 96 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 1

All Programs' Cost Recovery

63% 68% 68% 67% 66% 70%

40%43% 45% 45% 44% 46%

29% 32% 33% 34% 34% 34%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010

Programming (70% target)Programming & OpsTotal (39% target)

Cost of Service – Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process

Comprehensive Financial Management Policy 2.06 states that all bureaus charging fees are required to complete fee studies based on cost of service principles every two years.

FY 2013-14 budget direction is to include the fee study as a separate document within the Requested Budget submittal. Following is an overview of PP&R’s cost recovery performance over the last several years. Attached in Appendix A is the Cost Recovery Policy. Appendix B contains the draft PP&R FY 2012 Cost of Service Results; a full report will be published in Spring 2013.

Total Cost Recovery, Recovery Targets, Performance Related to Goals

A COS study attempts to determine the true or total cost of providing services to the public, and then compares total costs with the revenues generated by the same programming activities to obtain cost recovery rates, expressed as percentages.

The COS study shows how much of PP&R’s costs are paid for by taxpayer dollars versus how much are paid for by other resources, such as program and rental fees, grants, and donations. This information is used initially to inform policy that indicates what the blend of resources ought to be. Subsequent COS results serve to compare program performance to policy goals.

The current policy, adopted by Council in FY 2005, set Direct Recovery and Total Recovery targets by age group and neighborhood income level. Overall targets are currently set at 70% Direct Recovery and 39% Total Recovery. (The Cost Recovery Policy is attached in Appendix A.)

Cost recovery performance increased between 2004 and 2010:

• Programming, or Direct, recovery improved by 7%. For FY 2010, PP&R achieved its direct recovery target of 70%.

• Programming & Operations cost recoveryimproved by 6%, and

• Total recovery improved by 5%; however, it is still below the 39% target.

For a complete discussion of results, see the most recently published Cost of Service Study at http://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/article/331803.)

Draft results for FY 2012 indicate PP&R exceeded the 70% Direct Recovery Target at 71% performance, and continues to make progress toward the 39% Total Recovery Target with a performance of 38%. A full report is in development to be published in Spring 2013.

AgeGroup

NeighborhoodIncome

DirectRecovery

TotalRecovery

Adult Median & Above 110% 63%

Adult Low 50% 26%

Youth Median & Above 80% 42%

Youth Low 40% 23%

Mixed Median & Above 95% 53%

Mixed Low 45% 25%

All All 70% 39%

PP&R Cost Recovery Policy Targets

Page 101: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 97PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 2

Cost Recovery Goals & Public versus Private Benefit

“The policy establishes cost recovery goals for the bureau and provides guidance for implementation. Goals are expressed by demographic grouprather than by activity.

Participation, and reducing barriers to participation, are the currentfocus of public interest, and that particular activities are a matter of personal interest” (2005 Cost of Service Study).

The 2005 Cost Recovery Policy discusses the concept that various services provide varying levels of public versus private benefit. Setting lower cost recovery targets for youth and lower income neighborhoods reflected the bureau’s belief that services for youth and lower income populations have a higher proportion of public benefit, and thus are eligible for a higher level of subsidy.

Reducing barriers to access and providing equitable access are still key considerations; however, there is a growing interest in considering the ratio of public/private benefit of services, in order to appropriately assign a cost recovery target and thus appropriate levels of subsidy. This interest has evolved as discretionary budgets continue to decrease and it becomes more difficult to make funding choices.

PP&R recognizes the value of identifying levels of public/private benefit associated with servicecategories. To this end:

• In the early 2000’s, early work on developing a Service Delivery Strategy resulted in a Service Categories hierarchy based on the bureau’s budget programs. The heirarchy was meant to represent all the work that PP&R does, from a service perspective, rather than an organizational perspective, so that services and service impacts could be considered systemically and from a “customer experience” point of view.

• In 2009, the Service Categories work was used as the basis for populating a Functional Area heirarchy within the city’s new financial system.

• The bureau’s use of Functional Areas as management tools is maturing as we realize thebenefits of simultaneously viewing our work organizationally (by cost center) along with a service perspective (by functional area).

• The 2010 Cost of Service report recommended that cost recovery goals ought to be considered by program and that specific cost recovery targets should be established for programs that are implemented to serve specific public policy needs or market segments. This recommendation will be presented for SMT support in the coming year.

• In this year’s budget process, SMT and BAC considered where PP&R services ranked in terms of public versus private benefit, using existing Budget Programs. As our utilization of the finanical system becomes more sophisticated, future services’ analysis can be more finely quantified.

Page 102: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 98 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 3

Setting Fees & Economic Impacts

Fee increases always come with a concern that the fees will create or exacerbate financial barriers for some people. To mitigate the potential financial barrier to participation, PP&R offers a range of free or low-cost activities, especially in the summer, as well as scholarships (which function as price discounts) on an identified-needs basis. Program participation and scholarship levels are monitored; fee increases are one factor which may affect changes in these measures.

Many factors are considered in fee setting including but not limited to community needs and outcomes, the degree of public versus private benefit, cost recovery, budgetary targets, and competitor pricing. For example, the FY 2013-14 requested budget will include a proposal to increase swim lesson fees:

Prices for youth swim lessons would increase by $5.00. This would be an increase from the current $47.50 to $52.50. Prices for adult lessons would be raised by $10.00, and the price for semi-private swim lessons would be raised by $20.00. Revenue to be raised by this package is almost entirely (97%) from youth swim lessons. Even with a $5.00 increase in youth lessons, PP&R will still remain among the the most affordable in comparison to nearby providers of swim lessons:

• THPRD - $55.00 for 10, 30-minute youth swim lessons • Vancouver/Clark Firstenburg Community Center - $63.00 for

8, 30-minute lessons

This will be the fourth price increase in swim lessons over the past six years. A 10-session, youth swim lesson course will increase to $52.50 from a price of $37.00 in 2007. Although the price of swim lessons have increased substantially in the past six years, participation has continued to slightly increase as well. An increase in the price of swim lessons could potentially result in a greater demand for scholarship assistance.

In addition, PP&R will continue to offer a week of free swim lessons during the first week of summer at all pools, and free swim lessons are offered at selected pools during winter and spring breaks.

Page 103: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 99

PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 4

Appendix A - Cost Recovery Policy

RESOLUTION No.Approve cost recovery policy for City parks and recreation programs. (Resolution)

WHEREAS, a healthy parks and recreation system makes Portland a better place to live, work, and play; and

WHEREAS, the mission of Portland Parks & Recreation is to ensure access to leisure opportunities and enhance Portland’s natural beauty; and

WHEREAS, an objective of Vision 2020 is to provide a wide variety of high quality park and recreation services and opportunities for all residents; and

WHEREAS, when organizing recreational opportunities for the public, Portland Parks & Recreation offers activities that promote positive community values such as:

Lifelong learning;Health and a sense of well being;A sense of community;Respect for the natural environment; and

WHEREAS, Portland’s citizens have made a significant investment in parks and recreation facilities so that all citizens can have access to a broad range of positive leisure activities, and all Portland citizens benefit when the community has recreation sites that are clean, safe, and accessible to all; and

WHEREAS, Portland Parks & Recreation is obliged to protect these investments through sustainable operations and maintenance practices; and

WHEREAS, participation in positive recreation activities brings personal benefits to the individual participants such as an increased a sense of well being, life long learning, and enjoyment; and

WHEREAS, public recreation programs also bring benefits to the entire community such as increased community involvement and cooperation, a more attractive location for businesses and employees, better educated and more responsible youth, improved public safety and health, stronger and more cohesive neighborhoods, and greater respect for the environment; and

WHEREAS, broad participation in public recreation programs by a diversity of citizens from all segments of Portland increases both personal and public benefits; and

WHEREAS, the public interest is furthered in ensuring access to public recreation for groups experiencing barriers to participation; and

WHEREAS, with multiple benefits accruing to both personal and public interests, it is appropriate for public recreation programs to be supported by a blend of participant fees and taxpayer funding; and

WHEREAS, the annual City budget determines the amount of taxpayer support that is available for organized public recreation opportunities; and

WHEREAS, charging fees for participation is a way to increase the availability of those programs by supplementing taxpayer resources; and

WHEREAS, charging fees creates the responsibility to balance the availability of recreation programs with their affordability; and

WHEREAS, recreation programs exist in a voluntary market place where customers have complete choice about whether to participate, and where consumer choices are sensitive to the prices charged and the selection of offerings; and

Page 104: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 100 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 5

WHEREAS, Portland Parks & Recreation has prepared a cost of service study that identifies current cost recovery levels for the various types of recreation programs;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Portland that the cost of service study presented by Portland Parks & Recreation be accepted; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following cost recovery policy guide Portland Parks & Recreation’s efforts to organize and set prices for recreation programs;1) Public Interest – The public has an interest in the availability of a broad range of organized

recreation opportunities that encourage good health, lifelong learning, respect for the environment, and a sense of community.

2) Balance of benefits – Benefits of participation in public recreation accrue to both the participant and to the public and, therefore, it is appropriate that recreation be funded by a balance of participant fees and public resources.

3) Focus of cost recovery goals – The mission and goals for public recreation activities and programs apply to all citizens of Portland and interests in particular activities are determined by individual participants. The public interest lies in encouraging participation and reducing barriers to access of public recreation. Hence cost of service analysis and cost recovery goals are expressed in broad demographic groups for which there is particular public interest or for whom there exist significant barriers to participation. These groups are identified as follows:a) Youth: in order to invest in the future of our community.b) Adults: in order to increase the diversity of community participation in public recreation.c) Low income citizens: in order to ensure access and mitigate financial barriers to participation.d) Disabled citizens and seniors: in order to improve opportunities for inclusion and participation.e) New immigrants: in order to increase awareness of, and improve access to, recreation programs.

4) Cost recovery goals – Cost recovery goals express a balance of public and personal benefits defined in terms of the broad demographic groups identified as follows:a) Youth: Pricing for youth programs offered outside of low income neighborhoods should be set to

recover 42% of total costs.b) Adults: Pricing for adult programs offered outside of low income neighborhoods should be set to

recover 63% of total costs.c) Low income citizens:

i) Youth: Pricing of youth programs in low income neighborhoods should be set to recover 23% of total costs.

ii) Adults: Pricing of adult programs in low income neighborhoods should be set to recovery 26% of total costs.

5) Targeted recreation programs – Portland Parks & Recreation will provide recreation programs targeted to the special needs of disabled citizens, seniors, and new immigrant populations. The disabled citizens recreation, senior recreation, and outreach programs for new immigrant populations will have lower cost recovery rates than general recreation programs because of the fixed costs of organizing these programs. However, to the degree that disabled citizens, seniors, and new immigrants participate in general recreation programs, they are subject to the same prices as the general population, including pricing as appropriate for youth or low income citizens. Exceptions are for multiuse passes, golf, Pittock Mansion, and Crystal Springs Rhododendron Garden, where the bureau may continue the existing tradition of offering separate senior rates.

6) Pricing – Prices are to be set by recreation staff under the authority of the Director of Portland Parks & Recreation. In setting prices, the bureau will balance the goals of program availability and affordability within the constraints of budget allocations, market economics, and cost recovery goals approved herein.

7) Financial assistance – In addition to pricing which reflects cost recovery goals for low income neighborhoods and youth programs, Portland Parks & Recreation will seek to ensure affordability of recreation activities through scholarships, certain free youth activities, time-limited price promotions, and by cultivating volunteers and partnerships. Certain youth activities should be free and regularly

Page 105: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 101PP&R Cost Recovery Overview for FY 2013-14 Budget Process, Revised 1/30/2013 Page 6

available at community centers and SUN Community Schools as appropriate to ensure accessibility and participation as determined by Portland Parks & Recreation.

8) Cross-subsidization – Cost recovery goals, as determined by this policy, are intended to be averages across the recreation programs. Over- or under-realization of these cost recovery goals by any particular site or activity is acceptable in order that programming and pricing fit the realities of the marketplace and particular neighborhoods while maximizing participation, making efficient use of facility capacity, and maintaining a broad array of recreation offerings.

9) Activities requiring permits – A permit is required for certain activities in Portland parks. When permits for picnics or weddings result in exclusive use of an area, pricing should be set to achieve 100% recovery of total costs. When the purpose of a permit is to reserve a limited area for a limited time, such as a small group picnic, then prices should be set to recovery 100% of the direct costs incurred by the bureau.

10) Rental of facilities – Various facilities are available for use by groups and private parties. Pricing should be set to recover 100% of direct costs for rentals during normally open hours. For events during normally closed hours, prices should be set to recover all incremental costs incurred by the bureau, including staff, maintenance, and utilities. However, recognized friends of parks groups and City of Portland neighborhood associations may have reasonable use of facilities free of charge during normally open hours.

11) Waivers of Fees and Charges – Waiving or reducing certain fees and charges for recreation activities, permits, and rentals is within the public interest in order reduce barriers to participation, or optimize utilization and revenue generation of existing facilities.

The bureau shall establish an appropriation during the annual budget process to offset revenues lostby waiving fees and charges. Total fees and charges waived annually shall be constrained within this appropriation. The bureau may request budget adjustments during the fiscal year.

12) Updating of goals – Information about cost recovery levels should be updated annually, and cost recovery goals should be reviewed and updated at least once every two years.

Whenever the Council approves a cost recovery goal that is higher than the current level of recovery prices should be raised incrementally over time in the affected program categories in accord with market acceptance in order to optimize revenue generation in balance with program availability and participation. Whenever the Council approves a cost recovery goal that is less than the current level of recovery the bureau shall present a budget decision package during the subsequent annual budget process identifying the additional amount of General Fund discretionary resources necessary to achieve the goal and provide options for program changes or reductions in lieu of additional resources.

13) Compliance with budget – Notwithstanding the policy goals for cost recovery described above, the bureau’s first responsibility in organizing and pricing recreation programs is to operate within the budget set by City Council. Cost recovery goals are guidelines for program design and pricing, subsidiary to budgetary allocations and economic realities. Furthermore, cost recovery goals are subsidiary to the bureau’s responsibilities for parks system development and maintenance requirements.

14) Recreation enterprises – Golf and the Portland International Raceway continue as enterprise operations and should continue to recover 100% of their full costs.

15) Interagency services – Services provided to other bureaus or governmental agencies should recover 100% of their full costs, consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Financial Management Policy.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this resolution is non-binding city policy.

Page 106: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 102 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

DR

AFT:

CO

SS\F

Y 20

11 &

FY

2012

\CO

S C

harts

and

Tab

les.

xlsx

\FY

2012

Res

ults

Rev

ised

1/31

/201

3Pa

ge 1

DR

AFT

: PP&

R F

Y 20

12 C

ost o

f Ser

vice

(CO

S) R

esul

ts

Rev

enue

sPr

ogra

mm

ing

Cos

tsM

aint

enan

ce

Cos

tsU

tiliti

esC

osts

Cap

ital

Rep

lace

men

tO

verh

ead

Tota

lC

osts

Prog

ram

min

g R

ecov

ery

Prog

ram

min

g &

Ops

Rec

over

yTo

tal

Rec

over

yVi

sits

2012

Tota

lSu

bsid

y

Tota

l Su

bsid

y Pe

r Vis

itC

ost P

er

Visi

tR

even

ue

Per V

isit

Adap

tive

& In

clus

ive

Rec

$76,

749

$199

,835

$14,

204

$7,9

66$5

,976

$178

,182

$406

,163

38%

35%

19%

3,30

3$3

29,4

14$1

00$1

23$2

3

Aqua

tics

Buck

man

$56,

359

$186

,530

$29,

944

$0$0

$52,

435

$268

,909

30%

26%

21%

23,7

12$2

12,5

50$9

$11

$2C

olum

bia

$215

,460

$463

,992

$210

,574

$108

,458

$121

,992

$149

,202

$1,0

54,2

1846

%28

%20

%14

4,02

7$8

38,7

58$6

$7$1

Cre

ston

$161

,834

$169

,525

$69,

589

$25,

595

$58,

048

$62,

245

$385

,002

95%

61%

42%

37,0

30$2

23,1

68$6

$10

$4G

rant

$368

,534

$306

,622

$69,

344

$35,

665

$79,

282

$113

,847

$604

,760

120%

90%

61%

81,0

57$2

36,2

26$3

$7$5

Mon

tavi

lla$6

5,19

5$1

37,0

18$3

8,81

1$2

0,23

2$8

4,44

9$4

5,42

3$3

25,9

3348

%33

%20

%24

,809

$260

,737

$11

$13

$3Pe

nins

ula

$67,

097

$82,

229

$36,

327

$57,

045

$86,

291

$30,

572

$292

,464

82%

38%

23%

30,8

05$2

25,3

67$7

$9$2

Pier

$36,

607

$85,

150

$41,

957

$66,

116

$63,

546

$29,

619

$286

,388

43%

19%

13%

26,8

16$2

49,7

81$9

$11

$1Se

llwoo

d$2

68,7

61$2

43,2

92$5

7,85

3$2

8,13

8$8

7,58

8$8

9,84

7$5

06,7

1811

0%82

%53

%76

,033

$237

,957

$3$7

$4W

ilson

$322

,118

$245

,136

$55,

733

$19,

845

$80,

934

$86,

432

$488

,080

131%

100%

66%

70,9

09$1

65,9

62$2

$7$5

Aqua

tics

Tota

l$1

,561

,966

$1,9

19,4

93$6

10,1

32$3

61,0

94$6

62,1

30$6

59,6

22$4

,212

,471

81%

54%

37%

515,

198

$2,6

50,5

05$5

$8$3

City

Art

sC

omm

unity

Mus

ic C

ente

r$4

91,0

68$6

24,9

00$2

4,00

3$9

,753

$32,

000

$194

,396

$885

,051

79%

75%

55%

50,0

26$3

93,9

83$8

$18

$10

Laur

elhu

rst D

ance

Stu

dio

$151

,720

$107

,924

$33,

559

$1,2

56$1

2,62

0$2

5,43

3$1

80,7

9214

1%10

6%84

%JS

$29,

072

#VAL

UE!

#VAL

UE!

#VAL

UE!

Mul

tnom

ah A

rts C

ente

r$1

,195

,495

$1,1

35,6

10$1

57,4

54$9

6,69

3$2

06,2

36$3

77,6

26$1

,973

,619

105%

86%

61%

171,

896

$778

,124

$5$1

1$7

City

Art

s To

tal

$1,8

38,2

83$1

,868

,434

$215

,016

$107

,702

$250

,856

$597

,455

$3,0

39,4

6398

%84

%60

%22

1,92

2$1

,201

,180

$5$1

4$8

Com

bine

d C

ente

rsEa

st P

ortla

ndAq

uatic

s$8

62,2

02$1

,154

,030

$212

,099

$214

,652

$166

,752

$254

,583

$2,0

02,1

1675

%55

%43

%62

,752

$1,1

39,9

14$1

8$3

2$1

4C

omm

unity

Cen

ter

$775

,072

$1,2

16,4

26$1

16,9

72$8

4,29

5$2

18,4

40$3

11,6

48$1

,947

,781

64%

55%

40%

393,

320

$1,1

72,7

10$3

$5$2

Subt

otal

$1,6

37,2

74$2

,370

,456

$329

,071

$298

,947

$385

,192

$566

,231

$3,9

49,8

9869

%55

%41

%45

6,07

2$2

,312

,624

$5$9

$4

Mat

t Dis

hman

Aqu

atic

s$3

62,4

51$6

10,5

03$1

66,5

17$1

10,2

52$9

6,60

0$2

04,2

29$1

,188

,101

59%

41%

31%

30,3

59$8

25,6

49$2

7$3

9$1

2M

att D

ishm

an C

omm

unity

Cen

ter

$259

,586

$725

,309

$143

,655

$69,

143

$195

,581

$186

,115

$1,3

19,8

0336

%28

%20

%18

7,78

4$1

,060

,217

$6$7

$1Su

btot

al$6

22,0

37$1

,335

,811

$310

,172

$179

,395

$292

,181

$390

,344

$2,5

07,9

0347

%34

%25

%21

8,14

3$1

,885

,867

$9$1

1$3

Mt.

Scot

t Aqu

atic

s$8

05,0

67$8

96,6

26$2

30,6

72$1

66,9

75$1

48,3

50$2

62,7

76$1

,705

,399

90%

62%

47%

61,5

79$9

00,3

32$1

5$2

8$1

3M

t. Sc

ott C

omm

unity

Cen

ter

$599

,842

$964

,466

$138

,874

$74,

313

$270

,784

$217

,298

$1,6

65,7

3662

%51

%36

%40

9,00

9$1

,065

,894

$3$4

$1Su

btot

al$1

,404

,908

$1,8

61,0

92$3

69,5

47$2

41,2

88$4

19,1

34$4

80,0

74$3

,371

,134

75%

57%

42%

470,

588

$1,9

66,2

26$4

$7$3

Sout

hwes

t Aqu

atic

s$1

,068

,034

$814

,174

$179

,186

$216

,702

$102

,120

$262

,835

$1,5

75,0

1713

1%88

%68

%57

,364

$506

,983

$9$2

7$1

9So

uthw

est C

omm

unity

Cen

ter

$1,2

14,9

51$1

,610

,187

$99,

388

$88,

322

$236

,994

$357

,103

$2,3

91,9

9475

%68

%51

%29

2,54

9$1

,177

,043

$4$8

$4Su

btot

al$2

,282

,985

$2,4

24,3

61$2

78,5

74$3

05,0

24$3

39,1

14$6

19,9

38$3

,967

,011

94%

76%

58%

349,

913

$1,6

84,0

26$5

$11

$7

Com

bine

d C

ente

rs T

otal

$5,9

47,2

04$7

,991

,720

$1,2

87,3

64$1

,024

,654

$1,4

35,6

21$2

,056

,587

$13,

795,

946

74%

58%

43%

1,49

4,71

6$7

,848

,742

$5$9

$4

Com

mun

ity C

ente

rsC

harle

s Jo

rdan

$204

,109

$746

,857

$177

,041

$53,

466

$172

,000

$172

,329

$1,3

21,6

9327

%21

%15

%11

5,54

3$1

,117

,583

$10

$11

$2Fu

lton

$187

,238

$304

,788

$26,

254

$14,

624

$38,

000

$55,

012

$438

,678

61%

54%

43%

38,4

37$2

51,4

40$7

$11

$5H

illsid

e$3

62,7

65$3

69,3

50$8

7,85

7$2

1,11

8$4

4,30

0$9

7,41

3$6

20,0

3898

%76

%59

%24

,797

$257

,274

$10

$25

$15

Mon

tavi

lla$2

48,3

56$5

33,6

83$6

2,04

4$1

9,50

6$9

7,01

4$1

32,2

79$8

44,5

2647

%40

%29

%60

,298

$596

,170

$10

$14

$4Pe

nins

ula

$236

,723

$472

,873

$58,

558

$17,

803

$146

,211

$108

,535

$803

,980

50%

43%

29%

102,

910

$567

,257

$6$8

$2Se

llwoo

d$3

43,5

88$4

26,9

74$5

7,91

8$9

,891

$42,

096

$97,

360

$634

,239

80%

69%

54%

46,0

39$2

90,6

51$6

$14

$7St

. Joh

ns$1

79,1

88$3

56,5

52$9

6,61

9$2

0,21

3$6

3,26

8$6

6,49

9$6

03,1

5150

%38

%30

%45

,060

$423

,963

$9$1

3$4

Woo

dsto

ck$3

8,75

7$6

2,16

4$1

0,86

9$4

,227

$12,

480

$11,

231

$100

,971

62%

50%

38%

JS$6

2,21

4#V

ALU

E!#V

ALU

E!#V

ALU

E!C

omm

unity

Cen

ters

Tot

al$1

,800

,724

$3,2

73,2

41$5

77,1

60$1

60,8

48$6

15,3

69$7

40,6

58$5

,367

,276

55%

45%

34%

433,

084

$3,5

66,5

52$8

$12

$4

NO

TE: V

isita

tion

data

incl

udes

som

e le

vel o

f est

imat

ion;

ther

efor

e, S

ubsi

dy o

r C

ost P

er V

isit

anal

yses

hav

e on

ly a

mod

erat

e le

vel o

f con

fiden

ce. W

here

the

diffe

renc

e in

val

ues

is s

mal

l, ra

nkin

g re

sults

may

pro

vide

inad

equa

te in

sigh

t fo

r dec

isio

n m

akin

g.

Cos

t Rec

over

yG

F Su

bsid

yPr

ogra

mm

ing

& O

pera

tions

Page 107: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 103

DR

AFT:

CO

SS\F

Y 20

11 &

FY

2012

\CO

S C

harts

and

Tab

les.

xlsx

\FY

2012

Res

ults

Rev

ised

1/31

/201

3Pa

ge 1

Rev

enue

sPr

ogra

mm

ing

Cos

tsM

aint

enan

ce

Cos

tsU

tiliti

esC

osts

Cap

ital

Rep

lace

men

tO

verh

ead

Tota

lC

osts

Prog

ram

min

g R

ecov

ery

Prog

ram

min

g &

Ops

Rec

over

yTo

tal

Rec

over

yVi

sits

2012

Tota

lSu

bsid

y

Tota

l Su

bsid

y Pe

r Vis

itC

ost P

er

Visi

tR

even

ue

Per V

isit

Cos

t Rec

over

yG

F Su

bsid

yPr

ogra

mm

ing

& O

pera

tions

Out

door

Pro

gram

sC

omm

unity

Gar

dens

$89,

607

$141

,455

$269

,461

$18,

788

$0$5

9,85

2$4

89,5

5663

%21

%18

%10

0,00

0$3

99,9

49$4

$5$1

Dire

ctor

Par

k$3

3,76

2$1

29,1

86$1

54,9

91$1

2,41

4$0

$29,

292

$325

,883

26%

11%

10%

334,

340

$292

,121

$1$1

$0En

viro

nmen

tal E

d$1

70,4

34$5

26,2

63$5

99$0

$0$1

52,9

01$6

79,7

6332

%32

%25

%26

,214

$509

,329

$19

$26

$7O

utdo

or R

ecre

atio

n$1

14,8

87$1

90,5

60$5

99$0

$0$2

8,04

9$2

19,2

0760

%60

%52

%1,

410

$104

,320

$74

$155

$81

Out

door

Pro

gram

s To

tal

$408

,690

$987

,464

$425

,649

$31,

202

$0$2

70,0

94$1

,714

,409

41%

28%

24%

461,

964

$1,3

05,7

19$3

$4$1

Perm

its#

of p

erm

its:

Oth

er$1

39,0

54$8

5,33

3$0

$0$0

$23,

430

$108

,763

163%

163%

128%

18,9

34-$

30,2

91-$

2$6

$7Pi

cnic

s$1

24,9

20$1

10,9

33$1

3,09

9$2

,537

$0$3

0,45

9$1

57,0

2711

3%99

%80

%2,

290

$32,

107

$14

$69

$55

Spec

ial E

vent

s$5

55,2

41$6

48,5

31$7

43,8

49$9

6,20

2$0

$178

,067

$1,6

66,6

5086

%37

%33

%2,

376

$1,1

11,4

09$4

68$7

01$2

34W

eddi

ngs

$63,

463

$8,5

33$2

63,3

25$5

,734

$0$2

,343

$279

,934

744%

23%

23%

273

$216

,471

$793

$1,0

25$2

32Pe

rmits

Tot

al$8

82,6

78$8

53,3

31$1

,020

,272

$104

,472

$0$2

34,2

99$2

,212

,375

103%

45%

40%

23,8

73$1

,329

,697

$56

$93

$37

Seni

or R

ecre

atio

n$4

43,5

68$7

15,9

05$1

4,20

4$7

,966

$5,9

76$1

91,0

11$9

35,0

6262

%60

%47

%22

,562

$491

,494

$22

$41

$20

Spor

tsBa

sket

ball

$141

,122

$281

,230

$0$0

$0$7

1,55

9$3

52,7

8950

%50

%40

%15

5,45

4$2

11,6

67$1

$2$1

Fiel

d Sp

orts

$685

,421

$402

,979

$3,0

25,6

22$3

58,5

54$0

$19,

899

$3,8

07,0

5417

0%18

%18

%$3

,121

,633

#DIV

/0!

#DIV

/0!

#DIV

/0!

Oth

er S

ports

$63,

573

$90,

805

$0$0

$0$8

,615

$99,

420

70%

70%

64%

30,6

90$3

5,84

7$1

$3$2

Portl

and

Tenn

is C

ente

r$4

71,9

48$4

31,1

27$5

4,41

2$2

6,57

3$1

25,6

16$1

34,9

91$7

72,7

1910

9%92

%61

%18

,039

$300

,771

$17

$43

$26

St. J

ohns

Rac

quet

Cen

ter

$70,

695

$47,

197

$115

,093

$40,

859

$101

,717

$19,

019

$323

,885

150%

35%

22%

6,69

5$2

53,1

89$3

8$4

8$1

1Sp

orts

Tot

al$1

,432

,759

$1,2

53,3

38$3

,195

,126

$425

,985

$227

,333

$254

,083

$5,3

55,8

6611

4%29

%27

%21

0,87

8$3

,923

,107

$19

$25

$7

Sum

mer

Fre

e Fo

r All

Mov

ies

in P

arks

$61,

630

$139

,910

$2,5

32$0

$0$2

2,30

3$1

64,7

4544

%43

%37

%43

,325

$103

,115

$2$4

$1Su

mm

er C

once

rts$2

43,7

10$2

80,9

20$2

,748

$0$0

$38,

113

$321

,780

87%

86%

76%

65,2

00$7

8,07

0$1

$5$4

Sum

mer

Pla

ygro

unds

$85,

636

$208

,356

$60,

177

$0$0

$99,

203

$367

,735

41%

32%

23%

251,

500

$282

,099

$1$1

$0Su

mm

er F

ree

For A

ll To

tal

$390

,976

$629

,185

$65,

457

$0$0

$159

,619

$854

,261

62%

56%

46%

360,

025

$463

,285

$1$2

$1

SUN

Com

mun

ity S

choo

lsAl

ice

Ott

$30,

034

$131

,064

$0$0

$0$3

3,82

7$1

64,8

9123

%23

%18

%11

,217

$134

,858

$12

$15

$3Ar

leta

$20,

630

$122

,813

$0$0

$0$3

4,88

9$1

57,7

0217

%17

%13

%9,

870

$137

,071

$14

$16

$2Be

aum

ont

$39,

468

$124

,336

$0$0

$0$3

0,79

2$1

55,1

2832

%32

%25

%28

,398

$115

,661

$4$5

$1C

ente

nnia

l$2

5,58

2$1

25,1

64$0

$0$0

$25,

710

$150

,874

20%

20%

17%

71,2

90$1

25,2

92$2

$2$0

Faub

ion

$41,

373

$145

,676

$0$0

$0$4

3,13

1$1

88,8

0728

%28

%22

%13

,874

$147

,434

$11

$14

$3G

rout

$34,

165

$133

,496

$0$0

$0$3

2,71

8$1

66,2

1426

%26

%21

%16

,018

$132

,049

$8$1

0$2

Lane

$23,

549

$145

,848

$0$0

$0$3

1,28

5$1

77,1

3316

%16

%13

%JS

$153

,585

#VAL

UE!

#VAL

UE!

#VAL

UE!

Mt.

Tabo

r$4

1,93

4$1

56,1

89$0

$0$0

$36,

721

$192

,910

27%

27%

22%

30,7

12$1

50,9

76$5

$6$1

Park

rose

$22,

211

$141

,769

$0$0

$0$3

3,70

9$1

75,4

7816

%16

%13

%31

,691

$153

,268

$5$6

$1R

osew

ay (G

rego

ry) H

eigh

ts$5

9,48

0$1

84,7

28$0

$0$0

$52,

361

$237

,089

32%

32%

25%

27,3

25$1

77,6

09$6

$9$2

Sitto

n$2

0,06

9$1

24,2

58$0

$0$0

$34,

257

$158

,515

16%

16%

13%

12,3

73$1

38,4

45$1

1$1

3$2

SUN

Com

mun

ity S

choo

ls T

otal

$358

,494

$1,5

35,3

42$0

$0$0

$389

,400

$1,9

24,7

4223

%23

%19

%25

2,76

8$1

,566

,248

$6$8

$1

Gra

nd T

otal

$15,

142,

090

$21,

227,

288

$7,4

24,5

84$2

,231

,889

$3,2

03,2

61$5

,731

,010

$39,

818,

032

71%

49%

38%

4,00

0,29

3$2

4,67

5,94

2$6

$10

$4

Page 108: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 104 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

This page intentionally left blank

Page 109: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 105

Customer Service Improvement Status Report

Customer Service Improvement Status Report

Bureau: Portland Parks & Recreation Staff Contact: Ali Ryan Phone: 503-823-2967 Date: 1.28.2013

Bureau Mission and Goals:

Many of Portland Parks & Recreation’s organizational values – including respectful relationships, responsiveness to the needs of the public, and commitment to the safety and well-being of our visitors – are intrinsic to good customer service. As a Bureau, we continuously work to reflect those values.

Improving service delivery is a Key Result Area within Portland Parks & Recreation’s 2012-2015 Strategic Plan. Performance measures within that area are tied to customer satisfaction with the service PP&R provides, particularly recreation programming.

PP&R has developed a system-wide standard for customer service at its recreation sites. The standard establishes a baseline for service, which in turn makes identifying current levels of customer service possible, as well as identifies opportunities and tools for improving that service.

Using the customer service standard as a guide, PP&R has developed ongoing methods for assessing service delivery. These assessments help determine any necessary improvements, as well define the training and tools needed to help facilities and staff meet expectations.

PP&R has also established standards for communication, both with the community and within the Bureau. The Communication Standards policy defines levels of responsiveness for telephone, email and mail communications. The Internal Communication Standards of Practice for Management policy outlines strategies for effective communication between managers and staff, including improving communication flow, providing a variety of communication channels, and ensuring access to managers. The Public Involvement Manual, which establishes procedures for involving the community in PP&R projects and initiatives, helps ensure that the community is informed and engaged, and that the Bureau has the opportunity to develop and enhance its relationships with the customer community it serves.

Page 110: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 106 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Customer Service Assessment:

Portland Parks & Recreation annually completes a survey of customers who have registered for a recreational activity within the past 12 months. In 2012, PP&R expanded its survey method to include mail, e-mail, and on-site distribution. As a result, participation increased a historic 150 percent. A full survey results summary will be available in Winter 2013.

Other ongoing PP&R assessment tools include an always-available version of the customer satisfaction survey, comment cards, and course evaluations.

PP&R continues to work to solicit feedback from park users as well. The recreation program customer mail survey is one component of PP&R’s Visitor Information, Survey, Trends & Analysis program (VISTA), which coordinates, administers and analyzes various types of research and surveys to better understand user patterns, preferences and priorities. These include intercept surveys of parks and trail users, and randomized surveys of city residents.

New technology also plays a role in connecting with customers. ParkScan, a website for the community to quickly and easily report maintenance concerns to park supervisors, has been available since May 2009. Park Maintenance is also a category in PDX Reporter, the citywide smartphone application for reporting issues. Most park maintenance reports are flowed into ParkScan.

Workforce Development:

Training Programs BEST Program: PP&R’s ongoing Bureau Employee Service Training Program (BEST), which is based on the Bureau’s Customer Service Standards, provides consistent staff support in service operation and production.

As the BEST program enters its third year, the Bureau’s Customer Service Training Committee is working to tie its curriculum to feedback given by customers in the annual survey, course evaluations, and comment forms. The committee is also exploring development of program offerings for additional PP&R work units, such as maintenance and operations staff.

Customer Service Excellence Program: Developed specifically for PP&R Customer Service Center employees, the training series covers every detail of the customer relationship, with a particular emphasis on phone communication techniques.

Core Skills & Assessment Customer service experience and competency is an essential part of the recruitment and hiring processes for all PP&R employees. The Bureau’s new employee orientation, which all new hires complete, also has customer service as a key component.

Page 111: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 107

Progress reviews, performance evaluations and work plans for “customer service employees” include customer service as a primary measured component of work.

Additional Training OpportunitiesBureau staff also take part in service-oriented webinars and trainings from leading industry organizations such as the Learning Resources Network (LERN), the Oregon Park & Recreation Association and the National Recreation and Park Association.

Page 112: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

Page 108 City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14

Department Priority Budget ProposalAsset Mgmt High 10% Add Back Capital Major MaintenanceAsset Mgmt High 10% Add Back Central Services MaintenanceServices High 10% Add Back Horticultural Work in ParksCity Nature High 10% Add Back Natural Areas MaintenanceServices High 10% Add Back SUN CS - 3 sitesDirectors Office High Forest Park Ranger - BES IAACity Nature High New Tree Code - Partial ImplementationCity Nature High Protect The Best Program - BES IAAServices High SUN Community Schools Operated by PP&RServices High Teen ProgrammingDirectors Office Med 10% Add Back Administration Community RelationsAsset Mgmt Med 10% Add Back Central Srvcs Contracted ServicesServices Med 10% Add Back Delta Park Athletic Field ServicesCity Nature Med 10% Add Back Dutch Elm Disease ProgramCity Nature Med 10% Add Back Hoyt ArboretumCity Nature Med 10% Add Back Plant Prop & Tree Nursery ProgramServices Med 10% Add Back Recreation Services & StaffingServices Med 10% Add Back Sellwood Community CenterDirectors Office Med 10% Add Back SUN CS Pass ThroughCity Nature Med Dutch Elm Disease Inoculant - BES IAAServices Med Large Community Centers’ Sunday HoursCity Nature Med Summer Lunch ProgramCity Nature Med Willamette River Stewardship - BES IAACity Nature Med Youth Conservation Crew - BES IAA

Low 10% Add Back - OMF Internal ServicesDirectors Office Low 10% Add Back Administration - Safety & SecurityDirectors Office Low 10% Add Back Administration - Workers CompDirectors Office Low 10% Add Back Administration M&SDirectors Office Low 10% Add Back Aging & Disability Pass ThroughServices Low 10% Add Back Buckman PoolCity Nature Low New Tree Code - Full ImplementationDirectors Office Low Pioneer Square Pass ThroughCity Nature Low Urban Forestry Education & Outreach - BES IAACity Nature Low Urban Forestry Tree Inspector - BES IAA

FY 2013-14 PP&R Budget Advisory CommitteeThe BAC grouped the following budget proposals in high, medium, and low priority groups, with "high" being the packages most important to fund. Proposals are sorted alphabetically within each priority group.

Appendix ABudget Advisory Committee Prioritized List

FY 2013-14 PP&R Budget Advisory Committee

Page 113: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

City of Portland Parks & Recreation - Requested Budget FY 2013-14 Page 109

This page intentionally left blank

Page 114: Requested Budget - City of Portland, Oregon | Portland.gov

www.PortlandParks.org

Commissioner Nick Fish • Director Mike Abbaté

Sustaining a healthy parks and recreation system to make Portland a great place to live, work, and play.

Joseph Wood Hill Park