Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ED 469 944
AUTHOR
TITLE
INSTITUTION
SPONS AGENCY
ISBN
PUB DATENOTE
CONTRACTAVAILABLE FROM
PUB TYPE
EDRS PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
DOCUMENT RESUME
SP 041 114
Jamentz, KateIsolation Is the Enemy of Improvement: Instructional.Leadership To Support Standards-Based Practice.WestEd, San Francisco, CA.Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED),Washington, DC.ISBN-0-914409-13-12002-00-00109p.
ED-01-00-0012WestEd, 730 Harrison Street, San Francisco, CA 94107-1242.Tel: 415-565-3000; Tel: 877-4-WestEd (Toll Free); Web site:http://www.WestEd.org.Guides Non-Classroom (055)
EDRS Price MF01/PC05 Plus Postage.
Academic Achievement; *Academic Standards; ElementarySecondary Education; Faculty Development; *InstructionalLeadership; *Teacher Collaboration; *Teacher Competencies;*Teaching Skills
ABSTRACT
This book is designed to help, school leaders criticallyexamine what they should expect from students, how they, will know whenstudents have achieved those expectations, and how to design and implementinstruction to ensure that every student achieves agreed-upon goals. Itasserts that leaders are first and foremost teachers. Chapter 1, "Teaching toHigh Standards: Understanding What Teachers Need to Know and Be Able to Do,"reviews the instructional demands of standards based reform, detailingspecific teacher knowledge and skills critical to ensuring that all studentsachieve to high standards. Chapter 2, "Identifying Teacher Skills inPractice," presents two classroom vignettes illustrating the teachingbehaviors described in the previous chapter. Chapter 3, °The Work o.fInstructional Leadership: Supporting Teachers to Build and Sustain CriticalSkills," discusses the kinds of learning opportunities teachers need to buildand sustain critical skills, offering examples of how instructional leaderscan provide such opportunities by creating new structures for teacherlearning and using familiar structures more effectively. Chapter 4, "Leadersas Teachers: Leaders as Learners," identifies potential challenges asinstructional leaders take on greater responsibility for focusing on,exploring, and influencing classroom practice. An appendix presents tools forfostering and assessing instructional skills. (Contains 23 references.) (SM)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
I
.-..-l'trItClf;t1^.' ),737`;Cii0;/,1/ :.nstrtIctiorta', J....c,?..d....rsri-to
I.J.styuctional Lwadership 0 L.,31-;7!ctionqi.i.earleiship Ins-clicjoin:I Leat.ei-sliiti a iil.q
lr'..strtictinnzi .Lcact2rship 0 hist;.!ietioni41 L(!deivhip insIructinna. LA22.!
Ir.structional Leadership I...Nu/cis/4 13 Insin
p tirmal Lefuleiship Instruction ai Leadership a Inct;uctio,ial Learlusliip
0 Listriplio.pa/Leciehyship a Instructional leadership a filsirv(7.-iodal 1.crifleiship
4.1 toiaI icade:ship fast,.7!cf.io/.'/ f..,.(leiship Instructional Lt...cicrsiiip htsttpc-ti0iii4 few,
Ins:ructional Leadership a Idsti:,!ctioilal Learle;-shin InstruHonal Lcadecship List
.r.nstructionLI Leadership 0 bsta!rtional Lcarlership instructionzi tea(
eal Leaders/4 InStrUCtiOnalLeaderShip 0 Iilstipctioi-ml Leadepship 11:75.17IL ' °
Initi-pctioiral Ladeiship 232a ,IZZC...27;i1T7'.? 0 instacctional Leadership a )ilit;Tctirmal Leo:leis/lip 3
nal Leadership a insiTifctioilal Lcadeiship 0 i~lsn-uc--,:i.3LLI. 0 Instructional Lcaclushio a J;ctaciionaI Lef-i4eiship
lnstruc leadership C Inst;-nctioilal Leaeleiship 0 117..;i:::%;C::;;C:Tal c instiuctional ILL.T.clership 0 Iai,it'tio,iti/ .Lc
solation is the Enemy of ImprovementLIS I. LIC L10110
.I/a/ Z.-eat/US/11p c 11:25:::" 3- ? -. -.f'-':..`7 '''';'..- -1''Str' -r-I
tnstru:.-tic):-7.a1 1.,?adership
LLaueiSn:p G/U Lratf,t1.1rIcy' .....: b.:,.:44,.,..t.'..,_..L. ,,.::',... --.....,..!.',....--,!......., ! ..222C.272 C2t
° Listiuctio;u11 .st- 11 .11
a I:1st:let-lanai Lea(
-7; ° ..nsLr
nal Leadersh.ip a ListretCaSU ppo rtnStarldardS -Based eRfactuce4 "
a Instructional Leadership ° histafetioitid Leadership Lc.:aci2s.-:77., Instructional Lcodership a bstaTti arid [car,
nai 1,ezdzs;:-...',-7, a Instructional Leadership 0, histructioilal Leadcisliip a instructional Leadersl-1:o
a a Instructional Leadership 0 lilstilictlwerel Leaduship 0 l:115:71.:C.`.CF!. -..e2C.C:517'1'.; jostfuctioral I at
1,-caclership a Instructional Leadership a histi1!ctioild/Learic;sti.,2) a ii.zEL:EIT.i.7.; Insti
a his%rvctional Leadership 0 ::7,s-,:ncticar.a.: Instructional Leadership 0 liesi,wetiodal Leadership
nal Leadership a Instrpctioiial leadershii 0 linsi-7::e'siczla:leaL2.s.:-1:`p Instructional Leadership 0 1,ist;.uctio,w1 Leruleisbip
C Instructional Leadership a Inst;71ctional Leadership Instructional -Leadership a Jasractioie1 1.cru/
Instructional Leadership a hist,Tetional leadership 3 Trstrucrional Leaclership ids/
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
--1-7 Ross
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
)17( rumal Leadristiip 3 ...s.-r-,.;-..cz!enz.:. ::,-eZtE.1:r5:-.:l7; ° Instructional Lea(dice of Educational Research and Improvement ;U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
CEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION hipCENTER (ERIC) t np c Idstiuctio;ral leadership 0 .. -7,.---,:. ..f,:::_::]..5:::',..3 0 !ristl-0 This document has been reproduced as
iSireceived from the person or organization :ional Leadership 0 Iastrpctional .1.eadeivliip c :',.-:.::::::.:..c.:.:,,:.-..2-.1.1_,ca:'::
1
originating it.
I
0 Minor changes have been made toc'4 improve reproduction quality. a Instructional Leadership 0 Insmrctionril efut(/-ship
,INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Points of view or opinions stated in this Leac..t..b!p last, Holoilt.i Ltdocument do not necessarily represent
official OERI position or policy.
hi)! IMTICITia Lr'a&i-ship 0 0 Instructional T cadcrshio 0Improving education through research, development, and service
LeF.c.:.L.L:.:; 0 Jistructional Leadership a libstrzictioilel leadership ° 1.11StflirtiOPOI
° a Instructional Leadership a last;-r!ctio;ial I...earler.sliip InSIr
Lt:/!OC,')/1/p Instructional LeadershiP Listityrtio;i4 lei de;.ship
readership ist,Tctiodid 1efule7J.1)Ip IeadersI'ti' C Instructional Leadership a histi.uctio;itil Letuf..T.,14
strutiional Lc,it-lc:,.silip ° Iiistii!ctio;ral Lr'rult.7.51iip 0 rs:-Z.L'ona:. 11.1:..c:::::,:.`.7.:' 3 Instructional Leace:ship a iilst,.-i.,!-tif),!,,/ b.-pd
CD r ,, CaPi AVAU0 . ,1,...,(2::,:.,2T...1,-.:, c 115r...cm-nil:I, ..::aLL,s,:11., P e_? of.cieoda, Lea(leiship 3 ..711)`,:l.::T.::_;4:-.C.1(..":f.:, 0 :ns:rtictim'ill,i)
,elation is the Enemy of Improvement
Instructional Leadershipto Support Standards-Based Practice
Kate Jamentz
Western Assessment Collaborative
West Ed®Improving education through research, development, and service
3
West Ed, a nonprofit research, development, and service agency, works witheducation and other communities to promote excellence, achieve equity, andimprove learning for children, youth, and adults. While West Ed serves the statesof Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah as one of the nation's Regional Educa-tional Laboratories, our agency's work extends throughout the United States andabroad. It has 16 offices nationwide, from Washington and Boston to Arizona,Southern California, and its headquarters in San Francisco.
The Western Assessment Collaborative (WAC) at WestEd works with districtleaders, principals, and teachers to create effective professional development toolsand strategies that increase the capacity of schools to ensure that every studentachieves to high standards.
For more information about WestEd, visit our Web site: WestEd.org, call415.565.3000 or, toll-free, (1.877) 4-WestEd, or write:
WestEd
730 Harrison StreetSan Francisco, CA 94107-1242.
Library of Congress Card Number: 2002102861
ISBN: 0-914409-13-1
This report was produced in whole or in part with funds from the Office ofEducational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, undercontract #ED -01 -CO -0012. Its contents do not necessarily reflect the views orpolicies of the Department of Education.
© 2002 WestEd. All rights reserved.
4
Introduction
Chapter One:
able of Contents
1
Teaching to High Standards: Understanding What TeachersNeed to Know and Be Able to Do 6
Planning Backwards From Demonstrationsof Achievement 7
Implications for Establishing Standards forTeacher Performance 17
Implications for Instructional Leaders 20
Chapter Two: Identifying Teacher Skills in Practice 21
Ben Fryer: Teaching Third Graders to Write aReport of Information 23
Meg Tipple: Teaching Seventh Graders to Use Percentages 37
Chapter Three: The Work of Instructional Leadership: Supporting Teachersto Build and Sustain Critical Skills 51
Structures for Teacher Collaboration and Learning 52
Guiding Instructional Planning and Reflection 54
Chapter Four: Leaders as Teachers: Leaders as Learners 59
Resources 62
Appendix: Tools for Fostering and Assessing Instructional Skills 64
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank a number of people and organizations for theircontributions to the development of this book. First, thanks to the William andFlora Hewlett Foundation and the Walter S. Johnson Foundation for funding"Instruction at the Core." It is through the Western Assessment Collaborative's
(WAC) work with the district leaders, site administrators, and teachers in thisproject that the ideas and tools presented in this book have been developed.Thanks, too, to all those school and district leaders in San Lorenzo Unified,San Leandro Unified, and San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School Districtsfrom and with whom we have been learning. Of course this book would nothave been written without the commitment and skill of WAC staff membersJeannie Bosley, Cheryl Milner, and Trudy Schoneman, who provide directsupport to our partner districts. Special appreciation goes to Cheryl who wrotethe seventh-grade vignette in Chapter Two and has given invaluable feedback onall other aspects of the book. I am grateful, too, to those who reviewed and gavefeedback on drafts of the tools or text, chief among them Laura Cooper, JulieKoppich, Carol Robertson, Maureen Sanders, Cindy Tucker, and JoyZimmerman.
Joan Baratz-Snowden, Director of the Special Issues Division of theAmerican Federation of Teachers (AFT ), originally commissioned, reviewed,
and published "The Instructional Demands of Standards-based Reform," anarticle that with AFT permission has been revised as Chapter I of this document.Permissions for use of the seventh-grade Mathscapes unit entitled "Being anInformed Consumer" was generously granted by Glencoe/McGraw Hill.
1 ntroduction
the e Holy Grail of educators everywhere. Superintendents and principalsare exhorted to put issues of classroom practice above the bureaucratic opera-tions of their schools and teachers urged to take on new leadership roles tomentor and support other teachers. But clarity about what effective instructionalleaders do on a day-to-day basis has remained elusive.
The call for standards-based reform provides a unique opportunity to definethe work of instructional leadership. The commitment to establish sharedstandards for student performance and to target organizational resources toensure that every student meets or exceeds these standards requires that leadersprovide guidance and direction to the critical issues of what gets taught, thequality of the work students are expected to produce, and how instruction willbe evaluated (Elmore, 2000). Providing such guidance requires administratorsand teacher leaders to work in new ways.
In school systems that assume that some students will succeed academicallyand others will not, instructional leadership is often defined as "hiring goodteachers and getting out of their way." In the name of teacher autonomy or thebelief that good teaching is an "art" not easily taught or learned, school leaders
whether administrators or teacher-colleagues have stayed out of decisionsabout what goes on in individual classrooms on a day-to-day basis. Teacherswork in isolation from one another, seldom knowing what goes on even in the
7 INTRODUCTION
classroom next door. Differences in expectations for student performance fromone classroom to the next are accepted as the inevitable consequence of bringing
together teachers with different backgrounds, experiences, and values. The resultis that those students lucky enough to get teachers with high expectations andstrong teaching skills do high-quality work, while less is expected of andachieved by others.
In contrast, when the success of the education system is defined by everystudent reaching agreed-upon high standards, leaders are called upon to build acommunity ofshared, high expectations to which both students and educatorsare held accountable. In this system educators work together to consider whatstudents should be learning and are learning, question whether what studentsproduce is good enough, and collaborate on ways to ensure that students achieveat higher levels. To accomplish this, school leaders must break down the profes-sional culture that has kept instructional decision-making the private domain ofindividual teachers. They must find ways to replace old norms of isolationismwith new habits of collective action.
Unfortunately, most professional development programs fail to provideadministrators or teacher leaders with the tools or support they need to learn towork in these ways. This book is designed to help school leaders engage theircolleagues in critical questions of what they should expect from students, howthey will know when students have achieved those expectations, and howinstruction must be designed and carried out to ensure that every studentachieves to agreed-upon levels.
For the last six years, the Western Assessment Collaborative (WAC) atWestEd has been working with teacher, school, and district leaders to assistthem in implementing standards-based accountability systems. This work isgrounded in the understanding that commitment to achievement of highstandards by all students requires new ways of thinking about what teachersneed to know and do (Jamentz, 2001). Teachers need more diagnostic andanalytical capacity than ever before: They don't just "deliver" instruction; theyexamine readiness, analyze results, and monitor the effects of their actions onstudent performance. WAC's work has helped leaders identify these criticaldimensions of effective standards-based instruction, incorporate them intoexpectations for teacher performance, and learn the leadership skills needed tosustain this kind of teaching in their schools.
A key premise of this work is that leaders are first and foremost teachers. Theunderstanding that teaching is a key function of leadership underlies the work ofsuccessful corporate leaders such as General Electric's Jack Welch and INTELs
2__ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
Andy Grove (Tichey, 1997). It has also guided the work of effective schooldistrict leaders such as Anthony Alvarado and Elaine Fink who led New YorkDistrict #2's successful literacy reform efforts (Elmore & Burney, 1998; Fink &Resnick, 2001). In elaborating on the work of leaders like these, Noel Tichey, aprofessor at University of Michigan's Business School and former director of the
General Electric Executive Development Center, notes:
"Teaching is at the heart of leading. In fact it is through teaching thatleaders lead others. Leading is not dictating specific behavior. It is notissuing orders and commanding compliance. Leading is getting others tosee a situation as it really is and to understand what responses need to be
taken so that they will act in ways that will move the organizationtoward where it needs to be.... Teaching is how organizational ideas and
values get shared." (Tichey, page 57)
For the leaders in New York District #2, this meant that professional devel-opment was not centered on the occasional opportunity of a workshop, but tookplace in the day-to-day operations of the school. School and district leaders tookthe opportunity of their routine interactions with principals and teachers to askquestions or to give feedback designed to push on critical issues of instruction.
Similarly, WAC's work with school leaders challenges them to seize every
opportunity to focus attention on the essential issues of standards-based prac-tice: the alignment of instruction to agreed-upon content and performancestandards, the rigor of tasks students are given to do, the effectiveness of assess-ments used to monitor and report on student performance, and the appropri-ateness of the criteria used to determine what level of work is "good enough" tomeet a standard. District, site, and teacher leaders in our partner districts have
begun to reconsider what they talk about when they meet with teachers in theirsupervisory interactions; what they look for and give feedback on when theyvisit classrooms; and, even, how they use time at faculty meetings. They arebeginning to use these routine interactions to transmit new expectations forteacher and student performance and to learn together how to achieve
these expectations.
A second premise of WAC's work is that instructional leadership is the job ofadministrators and teachers alike. We expect administrators to understand thedemands of standards-based instruction well enough to foster the conditions thatsupport it. But we recognize that in order to provide for the continuous growthof every teacher, there must be many others at the school site who understandthe complexity of effective instruction and who are willing to question and guideothers through critical instructional issues. Our work supports teachers in
9__3_
INTRODUCTION
designated leadership roles peer coaches or mentors but, at the same time,encourages all teachers to establish norms that promote reflection and criticalreview of their own and their colleagues' instructional practice.
A third premise of WAC's professional development work is that instruc-tional leaders need to have and model the same commitment to highachievement by the adults in their school that they have for students in thestandards-based systems they are trying to create. They must operate on thebelief that the characteristics of effective teaching can be named, taught, andlearned. More importantly, they must operate on the belief that all teachers canand, when appropriately supported, will learn the instructional skills necessary tohelp every student succeed academically. To that end, leaders must be clear aboutexpectations for adult performance, must learn to collect and analyze data aboutadult performance in a variety of ways, and must provide specific and targetedfeedback that teachers can use to improve their teaching skills.
This book is intended to help instructional leaders recognize the characteris-tics of effective standards-based instruction and help their colleagues incorporatethese characteristics into their own practice and, more broadly, the collectivepractice of the school. We include tools that have emerged from WAC's profes-
sional development work. Chapter One opens with an overview of the instruc-tional demands of standards-based reform, detailing the specific teacher knowl-edge and skills critical to ensuring that all students achieve to high standards.That overview is followed by a brief discussion of what these new demandsimply for establishing standards for teacher performance and the work of schoolleaders in helping teachers build and sustain these skills.
Chapter Two presents two classroom vignettes that illustrate many of theteaching behaviors described in the previous chapter. The first vignette is set in athird-grade classroom and involves a unit on writing reports. The second vi-gnette is set in a seventh-grade math class where students are learning aboutpercentages. Each vignette provides a window into a classroom over the course ofseveral days, allowing us to see some of what the teacher says and does, theclassroom materials he or she uses and, occasionally, how students respond as theunit proceeds. In these brief illustrations of practice, the reader is able to identifyspecific indicators of effective standards-based instruction.
Chapter Three begins with a brief discussion of the kinds of learning oppor-tunities teachers need to build and sustain these skills. That discussion is fol-lowed by examples of how instructional leaders can provide for these learningopportunities both by creating new structures for teacher learning and by usingfamiliar structures more effectively. Three instructional planning or reflection
4- 10ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
frameworks are designed for use by instructional leaders and evolved fromWAC's professional development work with administrators and teacher leaders.
Chapter Four identifies some of the challenges that may arise as instructionalleaders take on greater responsibility for focusing on, exploring, and influencingclassroom practice.
The final section of the book contains formatted copies of all of the profes-sional development tools referenced in the previous chapters. Included are thethree instructional planning or reflection frameworks introduced in ChapterThree, as well as unannotated versions of the vignettes from Chapter Two. Theseversions are intended for use as exercises with administrators or teachers to helpthem internalize an understanding of the specific practices common to effectivestandards-based instruction. Readers are encouraged to reproduce and use thesematerials to promote learning in their own districts or schools.
The professional development tools presented in this publication are de-signed to initiate learning about effective standards-based instruction. But theyare only a beginning. While the instructional planning and reflection frame-works, for example, guide teachers and administrators in what questions to ask,they are necessarily limited in their ability to suggest desired answers in specificcontexts or to help leaders know how to respond to what teachers may say.Absent video or other media exemplars to illustrate a range of hypotheticalinteractions, the tools are best used in settings in which a supervisor or peerobserver is available to provide feedback about the rigor and direction of anydiscussion provoked by the use of these tools.
Judging by work in WAC's partner districts, it is fair to say that these toolsshould probably come with a warning label: Use of these tools has been known to
disturb district policy and require leaders to work in new ways. As administrators
and teacher leaders have learned new skills, WAC's partner districts have found
themselves entering unanticipated and sometimes uncharted territory. In
some instances, principals and teachers have called for revision of the standards
and performance indicators that had been adopted for teacher evaluation in theirdistricts. The work has also raised questions about how teacher performance dataare collected and about the professional development needed for those whose job
it is to support and evaluate teachers. Perhaps most dramatically, the work hascalled into question the level of investment made in the system of policies andpractices intended to support teacher quality. As WAC's work with partnerdistricts continues, we offer this book to those who wish to launch similar efforts
in their own district or school.
-SINTRODUCTION
CHAPTER ONE
eaching to High Standards:Understanding What Teachers Need to Knowand Be Able to Do*
...qfMERICANS HAVE LONG PRIDED THEMSELVES ON A PUBLICschool system that welcomes all corners. Since the middle of the 19th
century, children of the immigrant poor and from both working class and well-established families have had access to what Horace Mann envisioned as a systemof "common schools" that "equalized the conditions of men." The currentstandards movement was born of the realization that, despite public schoolsopening their doors to everyone, what students experience once they walkthrough those doors varies greatly. As it has turned out, America's system ofcommon schools provides anything but a common experience for its students.
In the schools most of us attended, as well as in most of today's schools,the teacher's primary job has been to plan engaging instructional experiencesdesigned to help students cover the curricula in a given grade level or contentarea. Teachers have chosen lessons or learning activities from texts or havemade up their own to address key topics from that curriculum. Working inisolation, they have individually determined how long to spend on a given topic,
This chapter is an adaptation of a paper commissioned and published by the Special
Issues division of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). Titled The Instructional
Demands of Standards-Based Reform, it is available from AFT.
__ 12ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
when and how to test students on what they have learned, and what criteria touse for rating the quality of students' work. What teachers have taught andexpected of students has been a function of what individual teachers know ordon't know about their subject matter, what they like to teach, and what theybelieve their various students are capable of learning.
Thus, what students are exposed to, what they learn, and "what counts" interms of their grade have been determined by which teacher they happen to have
in a particular year or course. Other students in the same grade level or course,but with a different teacher, might be required to do very different work or beexpected to produce work of much greater or lesser quality. For the most part,those students deemed by the system to be "college material" land in the classesof the most demanding teachers, while others experience a range of expectationsfrom challenging to "Mickey Mouse."
Standards-based reform envisions something different: that all students can
achieve to high levels. In this vision, school systems are driven by agreementsabout what every student should know and do, guided by assessment data thatreveal whether students have adequately learned those things, and motivated byaccountability mechanisms designed to ensure that every student has access to
effective learning opportunities.
Unfortunately, the rhetoric of the standards movement has largely ignoredthe subtle but profound shifts in classroom and school practice that must occurif we are to push beyond the platitude of "high standards for all" and see thatgoal come to life in student performance. Missing from the discussion is anyspecificity about how our "wish list" of what students should know and be ableto do gets translated into changes at the classroom and school level. If we are
sincere in the commitment to turn slogan into reality, school leaders need tounderstand the very real demands of standards-based instruction. Equallyimportant, they must understand their own role in ensuring the capacity of every
classroom teacher to meet these demands.
Planning Backwards From Demonstrations of Achievement
In a standards-based education system, expectations for student performance arenot left to individuals, but set by the larger community by a school, a district,
or a state. And those agreed-upon standards apply not just to certain students,
but to every student. The standards describe not only what students shouldknow (content standards), but the quality of the work every student will be
13 TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
expected to do (performance standards). Once standards are set, programmaticresources are allocated to ensure that every student reaches but is not limitedto this high-level education foundation.
If every student is to achieve the given standards, the traditional process bywhich a teacher plans a course and his or her daily instructional activities mustbe turned on its head (see Figure 1). A teacher must start with a solid under-standing of the shared expectations for student performance and then planbackwards to determine what each lesson must look like if every student is to beprepared to meet the standards.
Figure I : The Process of Instructional Planning
Traditional Practice Standards-Based Practice
Select a topic from the Select standard(s) from among those thatcurriculum students need to meet
I 4,Design instructionalactivities
Design an assessment through which studentswill have an opportunity to demonstrate theknowledge to
Jr
and skills meet standard(s)
4,
Design and give an Decide what learning opportunities studentsassessment will need to learn those things
I Jr
Give grade or feedbackPlan instruction to ensure that each studenthas adequate opportunities to learn
/Move onto new topic Use assessment data to give feedback,
reteach, or move to next level
Using Assessment to Guide Instruction
To ensure that every student achieves to high standards, teachers must,themselves, understand the standards and that means having a clear vision ofwhat achievement of each particular standard would look like: What will a
student have to do to demonstrate achievement? And what qualities will have tobe evident in the performance for it to be considered demonstrative of sufficientprogress or mastery? The answers to these questions guide both the design oflessons and decisions about how to plan and pace instruction.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
14
In traditional instructional planning, teachers generally develop assessmentsonly after they have taught a curriculum unit; the test is designed to checkwhether students know what has been taught. By contrast, in standards-basedsystems, the assessment represents what students need to know, thereby guidingwhat is taught. The teacher begins instructional planning by conceptualizing thetask or tasks students would have to do and how well they would have to
perform those tasks to demonstrate achievement of one or more standards.Only then does the teacher plan a set of lessons designed to ensure that everystudent in the class will be able to perform those tasks.
Good teaching requires a balance between providing students with opportu-nities to learn and practice new skills, and collecting evidence of whether stu-dents can do the same or similar tasks on their own, and, if not, why not. It isthe information yielded by this evidence that, in turn, guides subsequent instruc-tion. Teachers, therefore, must have a means of periodically gathering validevidence at the classroom level of how student learning is progressing. Theymust be well versed in what has been called "assessment literacy" (Stiggins,1994). They must know how to design and/or administer an assessment activitythat is a good match to the kind of learning outcome required by thestandard(s). They must also decide how much support to provide as studentsperform the task, and they must recognize the point at which support confoundsthe data the assessment is designed to provide.
In Figure 2, the math standard asserts that all students should know how tocalculate statistical measures accurately and in what contexts each should beused. Assessment A is aligned only to the first part of the standard. In Assess-ment B, students are required to calculate accurately, consider, and justify avariety of statistical measures while anticipating counterarguments of the childnot chosen for the team. If students were prepared only for Assessment A, theywould not have the opportunity to learn all that is expected by the mathstandard.
Teaching While Thinking About the End
Traditional instructional planning is driven by a text or a curriculum guide.Far too often, however, curriculum guides list only the most general topics towhich students should be exposed, offering no detail about what students shouldknow or about what they should be able to do with the information or skillsthey learn. For example, an eighth-grade curriculum guide might list "thecolonial period in American history" without stating what students should knowabout the American colonies or how they might be expected to apply thatknowledge, for instance, to argue for or against taxes being levied in their own
TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
Figure 2: Sample Assessment Activities
SIXTH GRADE STANDARDS TO BE ASSESSED
MATH: STATISTICS, DATA ANALYSIS, AND PROBABILITY
1.0 Students compute and analyze statisticalmeasurement for data sets including:
compute the range, mean, median, and mode ofdata sets;understand how additional data added to datasets can affect these computations of measuresof central tendency;understand how the inclusion or exclusion ofoutliers affect measures of central tendency; andknow why a specific measure of centraltendency (mean, median, mode) provides themost useful information in a given context.
Assessment A
Calculate the mean, mode, median, and range ofeach of the following sets of numbers:
I) 42, 98, 15, 15, 12, 17
2)
3)
Mean = Median =Mode = Range =
105, 120, 79,
Mean =
108, 105,
Median =
105
Mode = Range =
12, 8, 6, 3, 8, 8, 10
Mean = Median =Mode = Range =
WRITING: COMPOSITION
I .0 Students write persuasive essays or letters that:state a clear position on a proposition orproposal;support the position with organized and relevantevidence; andanticipate and address reader concerns andcounterarguments.
Assessment B The Bowling TaskThe tables below show the season's bowling scoresfor two members of your team. A higher numberindicates a better game.
Dave's Scores: 152; 138; 141; 144; 141; 158Bill's Scores: 210; 105; 118; 131; 105; 215
Both Dave and Bill are hoping for a spot on theteam you will take to the League Championships.As the coach, you must decide which one shouldbe chosen.You have only one spot left on theteam. Examine the data and consider thestatistical procedures that might be used to makeyour decision.
Part I: On one side of your paper, show all thestatistical procedures you considered in makingyour selection.This part of the assessment willbe scored on the appropriateness of the statisticalprocedures you consider and the accuracy ofyour calculations.
Part 2:The person you do not choose will be verydisappointed and will want to understand how youdetermined your choice.Write a letter to the personyou did not choose explaining what statisticalprocedures you considered and used to make yourdecision. Use charts and graphs as necessary toillustrate your findings. The purpose of your letter isto persuade the reader that you made a thoughtfulselection. It should:
state a clear position on a propositionor proposal;support the position with organized andrelevant evidence; andanticipate and address reader concerns andcounterarguments.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
16
communities. Lesson plans are often sequenced according to the order of the
topics listed, or by the table of contents in a text, with little consideration ofprerequisite knowledge or skills. The activities students are given to do are either
dictated by the text or are devised by the teacher to engage students. Studentsbusily complete textbook-based tasks, do book reports, construct posters ordioramas, or write reports with little knowledge of what is expected of themother than turning the assignment in on time. To a large extent, the success of aclassroom activity is gauged by supervisors and teachers alike on whether stu-
dents completed the task and enjoyed it.
In contrast, standards-based instruction targets the quality of performance
we want from students. It is not enough to have completed an assignment;
students' work must demonstrate progress toward mastery of specific knowledge,skills, or dispositions. With the quality of the performance expected clearly inmind, teachers plan and conduct lessons aimed at teaching students how toachieve these specific characteristics. (An example of an instructional unit planfor assessment B, above, is provided in Figure 3.) In this context, instruction isnot random. Rather, it is planned in relation both to what students already know
and can do information gleaned from assessment and to the qualities of
work they are expected to do.
A high-quality, standards-based unit might begin with the teacher explainingwhat students will be required to do at the end of the unit and what criteria willbe used to judge their performance. At some point, the teacher might introducework samples of varying quality done by other students for a similar task. Byexamining these samples with the students, the teacher can help them discernwhich ones embody the qualities required by the standard. Later, after they haveparticipated in lessons designed to teach to those qualities, students might beasked to practice their new skills by revising and improving upon the weaker
sample responses.
Many Routes to One Standard
In standards-based systems, the end is held constant for all students; eachone is expected to meet the standards. But the means of getting students to thatend may vary greatly within and across classrooms. As is true of all effectiveteaching, in standards-based systems, teachers must develop a repertoire ofdifferentiated strategies for meeting the variety of learning needs representedamong any group of students. Classroom educators must artfully orchestrate
effective lessons and choreograph groupings that allow students to progress attheir own rate while, at the same time, ensuring that no student falls through thecracks. As conductors of standards-based instruction, teachers are not driven by
11TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
Figure 3: Instructional Unit Planning
Standards
Math: Students compute andanalyze statistical measures ofmean, mode, median, and range andknow why a specific measure ofcentral tendency provides the mostuseful information in a givencontext.
Assessment
The Bowling Task
Required Opportunities to Learn
Math
Lessons on calculation of mean,mode, median, and range
Lessons identifying appropriateuse of these statistical proce-dures why/when to use oneover the other
Lessons using charts or graphs toillustrate statistical informationor findings
Opportunities to select andjustify the choice of a statisticalprocedure in a given context
Practice problems that requireconsideration of more than onestatistical procedure
Practice problems that requirestudents to state assumptions
that give context to theirselection of one measure overanother
Practice describing mathematicalconcepts in writing to others
Writing:Writes persuasivecompositions.
Writing
Lessons illustrating the character-istics of persuasive writing
Lessons illustrating how authorsanticipate counterarguments
Practice laying out an argumentin writing and using evidence
(even visuals) to support conclu-sions
Practice with problems andarguments requiring author tostate assumptions beforeproceeding
Practice anticipating
counterarguments
Practice writing letters thatanticipate, acknowledge, and statecounterarguments
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
llISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
texts or other instructional materials, yet they know how to draw on theseresources as appropriate to help students learn what they need to know.
Standards-based instruction demands that teachers know both their contentand their students well. Teachers' capacity to pose questions, select tasks, evaluatestudent understanding, and decide what to teach next all depend on how they,themselves, understand their subject matter and what they are able to discernfrom assessment about their students' prior knowledge. Staying one chapterahead of the class will not suffice. Research suggests that to help students learn tohigh levels, teachers must understand how concepts within their discipline arerelated to others within and outside their field. They must understand howknowledge in that field is generated and verified. They must understand theirsubject matter deeply enough to identify how particular phenomena or eventsare commonly interpreted and the fundamental ideas that underlie those inter-pretations (McDiarmid, Ball, & Anderson, 1988).
It is this solid understanding of the content that makes a teacher sensitive tomisconceptions or misunderstandings that students may bring to new learningexperiences in a particular content area. This sound knowledge also helps teachersdetermine the skills that are prerequisite for the achievement of certain standardsand enables them to glean from a student's work what he or she is ready to learn.
Judging Performance and Giving Feedback Based onShared Standards
In most traditional classrooms, judgments about student performance arecommunicated in summary grades, with individual teachers determining theirown grading policy. Grades are generally based on a combination of a teacher'sjudgment about the quality of the student's work and a judgment about thestudent's attitude or level of effort. A student who has not produced high-qualitywork may, nonetheless, get an "A" if he or she is considered to have a positiveattitude and to have worked hard. Similarly, work that is otherwise of highquality may receive only an average grade if the student has failed to meet lengthspecifications or to include all required components of an assignment.
In standards-based instruction, the teacher's judgment about a student'sprogress and the quality of his or her performance reflects hard-won district orschoolwide agreement about the specific intellectual characteristics of acceptableperformance. These performance standards might be reflected in cut scores onan assessment, or in exemplars of the quality of work expected of all students(see Figure 4). While there will always be some grading differences attributableto individual preferences, in a standards-based system, a student can be reason-
19 TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
ably certain that what is considered good work or acceptable progress by oneteacher, will be considered similarly by the others.
In school systems with shared standards, feedback to students is tied specifi-cally to the shared expectations for that type of assignment, and the feedbackdistinguishes between the quality of the work students produce and the effort orattitude demonstrated while doing it. A teacher's evaluative comments andanalysis of a student's progress are based not on what that one teacher happens tothink a given student can do, but on what evidence has shown every student canreasonably be expected to do when provided with high-quality instruction.Students are also taught to evaluate their own work and progress in respect tospecific characteristics of quality. They learn to say, "This essay needs moreevidence from the text to bolster my argument," rather than, simply, "I didn't dovery well on this essay."
In Figure 4, the papers labeled "H" and "0" illustrate the challenge of deter-mining reasonable expectations for student performance. Both papers werecompleted in response to Assessment B, Part 2, The Bowling Task in Figure 2.Which of these two responses better meets the standards, which call for thestudents to "anticipate counterarguments" and demonstrate understanding ofmore than one statistical measure? Paper "H" does these things. What about paper"O"? Should it be considered good enough for a sixth grader doing this task?
Planning and "Reteaching"
In schools designed to accept that some students will "get it," and others willnot, a unit of instruction ends when the teacher gives the assessment, grades thework, and moves on. In contrast, the success of standards-based instruction isbased on evidence of adequate student learning. No longer can it be sufficient tosay, "I taught a good lesson, but my students didn't get it." Acceptable evidence ofgood teaching is student work or student performance that meets agreed-uponstandards. When the work is inadequate, the teacher or the school as a whole isresponsible for providing additional, refocused opportunities to learn.
In standards-based instruction, teachers use student work to find patterns ofstrengths or weaknesses that point either to the success of a lesson or to the needto revisit a lesson already taught. Teachers also look to the work of individualstudents to see what the student already understands and how it can be builtupon to address those things he or she still needs to learn.
Figure 5 illustrates how student work can be used to diagnose student needsand plan instruction. When analyzed carefully, the work below reveals a good
14_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
t`..D
Fig
ure
4: S
tude
nt W
ork
Sam
ples
TA
W 'W
A,
Irm
1,tiz
uion
akria
ve
idel
/.
IPA
I 1/.
11/
/. N
IAid
. /. 9
.A
ltr
/.I/1
!b.
.ta
1.0M
it111
.i
.r.
tr.
. ,..1
/.
..gr.
W. i
n.1
...l\
t/.4
aw
evsk
cilie
ukr
ow_i
a&re
Ala
rtt
nwjA
rric
inyt
s,tio
u.tu
al o
, tlia
llniA
rmA
refo
tof
()A
sa)
1.54
,I
Ilab
*15
tAi I
AN
teA
4 I
lwle
d.It
rucv
ttmoc
ispa
a *e
lkir
zyc
Pcod
_tr
io 'I
A.A
.tilir
tavn
zub.
...4?
ire*V
ie"
'AL
1:. .
..L
vl.
tinit
catf
ettk
SA
W Y
1MA
1 14
8 \o
wl
PrI
PA
rta
et/2
,eot
13S
orV
W6A
4,c,
Ou.
ciw
wke
rAil
Dor
ve n
vf.te
rive
jr: t
ale
* 91
mpo
cres
s li.
vevw
1/2,
4e
strm
eno
t fur
'Ain
Yea
: Wks
4tir
ecl
41 tk
iavu
t LA
ni.
vore
l tic
ok
aw,ia
t Tw
ric,
wou
ldre
l-i
num
Oili
n_D
YW
IT_
I
-6,4
Ixer
prei
- %
1,14
uray
42ta
iko
uli
kIA
L 4
7o.1
11_t
ettA
0(o
ntie
firic
i1
roam
.nk
-1.1
64nt
r,r4
,1
0R
at 2
-"D
eve,
.
uneo
l.tin
e C
Y,o
tie \
mad
e '..
uas
foe.
311\
ty,
+5
Lea
Cir
empi
anep
ips.
Ay
line
(bad
-LA
I/is
die6
s\ak
Yoa
416
4 Y
Ysi
e vs
iel
tkiN
(fi
bde
tiam
th, k
b*rh
at'
Bid
s S
rovo
t44
.4 ta
st-
cola
ywa,
adde
d+
wit,
gvot
aids
viC
o 4D
gra
! A
o+k
a ve
rta5
,T
IAvr
S SM
PS:
ISE
1311
.: 5
3 L
OM
Z 10S"
ue
+ .111
_9
74 4
-fi
ati
:117
.1
sive
tzie
was
44
a W
ile. 1
1',V
eit..
The
o.-c
oo-
ich
oose
Wen
.w
ee 1
0 ne
lthea
t.C
oact
.
Figure 5: Diagnosing Student Work
Pos4- Dense % ql
v,enui ourvink e. (105.e. P.-10 eccoale___ypo Oriv\.- 4- ~Ake_ Pi. -to +Ifte, c trtmaia.-t; Poir5(413,0,
bt.,14 otavki- bt ciPb.saipo Pia , ca-vtd 1tacd/ ceue you cutk_ P ietki.ot414, A
oc (Any r eirboaspoi gltd-sP, r-,roz,res
f I K. ilnua tpia.1-Te yoo_____14-er_p_ap_yat? r
So e teek.se, 4-ry et9a.Pet- 402_ 1.4.2/..eit,.4-c mow`. l.A, $ / / 14;t4L it) Ina.° e. /M.)
5?6,Lep...ce
deal about what this student knows and what may still confuse her. It is obvious,for example, that she knows the concept of consistency, but not the termitself. The phrasing in which she uses the term "average" should also make the
teacher suspicious about her understanding of this statistical procedure. Inplanning for "reteaching" this student, the teacher will want to address boththese issues.
As noted earlier, the obligation to circle back to ensure the success of eachstudent requires that teachers develop a strong repertoire of instructional skills
16_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
22BEST COPY AVAILABLE
designed to address a variety of learning needs. It also requires schools to func-tion in such a way that teachers can call on other colleagues when their ownskills don't suffice.
Collaboration to Support Student Learning
Effective standards-based instruction requires not only that teachers workdifferently in their own classrooms, but in their relationships with colleaguesthroughout the school. Schools committed to the achievement of high standardsby all students are organized around shared definitions of what students areexpected to do. That means that even if standards have been established at thestate level, teachers leave the isolation of their classrooms and come together tonegotiate common interpretations of those standards as they would hope to seethem reflected in the work students are given and produce every day.
In these schools, collaboration is not simply a desirable working condition;it is a requisite professional responsibility. Teachers engage in professionaldialogue for the purpose of challenging each other's expectations about whatstudents can and should do, sharing effective instructional strategies, and, asnecessary, adjusting or reallocating resources or expertise to address sharedprogrammatic concerns. Teachers in these schools have the skills and thetime to negotiate common interpretations of quality and to collaborate inplanning collective action.
In schools committed to high achievement by every student, decisions aremade in consideration of "our students," not just "my students." Decision-making and resource allocations are guided by a single criterion: "Will this helpensure that every student will meet the standards?" Teachers are called upon toshare resources and expertise in ways that serve all students well. While teachers'individual content and pedagogical strength are essential to the standards-basedsystem, they do not suffice. Teachers must also be willing and able to share thatexpertise in a manner that contributes to a system whose effectiveness is greaterthan merely the sum of its parts.
Implications for Establishing Standards forTeacher Performance
In aspiring to high performance for every student, standards-based reformnecessarily demands high performance from all teachers. Effective standards-based instruction, like all effective teaching, requires deep content knowledge
23 TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
and a variety of skills for engaging students and managing instruction. But thespecific commitment to ensuring high levels of achievement by every student alsoputs additional emphasis on teachers' ability to:
...Understand expectations for student performance
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
work with colleagues to develop shared understanding of the specificcharacteristics of work that meets the school/district/state performancestandards;
internalize these quality criteria in order to plan instruction and providefeedback on student work; and
score or grade student work reliably in relation to shared performancestandards.
...Communicate standards for student performance to parents andstudents, and help students assess their own progress in relation to thesestandards
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
provide students with quality criteria and/or models as part of a lesson;
provide students with timely feedback on their work in relation to thecharacteristics that meet the performance standards;
build self-assessment opportunities into lessons on a regular basis; and
communicate student progress to parents in relation to shared school/district/state performance standards.
...Align instruction to standards
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
select or design lessons and assignments that are at the appropriate level ofrigor for the standards and will prepare students to demonstrate deepunderstanding of key facts or concepts;
map backwards from expectations for student performance to ensure that
every student has access to lessons required to achieve the performancestandard; and
differentiate instruction as required to address unique learning needs.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 24
...Collect accurate data on student performance
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
understand the various purposes of assessment and the appropriate and
inappropriate uses of different types;
use a variety of assessment data in ways that are appropriate to their
purpose;
design or select classroom assessments appropriate to a given standard or set
of standards;
analyze the quality and comprehensiveness of data available from a given
assessment and determine what additional data might be needed to provide
an accurate picture of what individual students know and can do; and
organize and manage student performance data to keep track of each
student's progress.
...Use data to guide instruction
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
diagnose students' misunderstandings, confusions, and strengths from the
work they produce;
use analysis of student work to plan instruction on a daily basis; and
design student assignments based on a diagnosis of what students already
know and need to learn.
...Work effectively as part of a team
Effective standards-based instructional practice requires that teachers:
share resources and expertise to ensure achievement by all students.
School leaders would be wrong to assume that these are advanced skills,required only of veteran classroom teachers. In fact, these are the skills thatdifferentiate what some have called "random acts of teaching" from instructiontargeted to ensure that all students achieve to agreed-upon levels. As districtsestablish standards for teacher performance and devise systems to supportteacher learning, it is critical that these behaviors be expected of all teachers.
25_19
TEACHING TO HIGH STANDARDS
Implications for Instructional Leaders
The norms and practices underlying systems of differentiated standards are
deeply ingrained, in part because they have been supported by school leaders.Teachers have been taught and supported to develop and implement engaginglearning activities, irrespective of whether some students benefit and others donot. The criteria used to judge the quality of instruction have focused primarilyon how a teacher presents a lesson, with little regard for what students produceas a result. Organizational investments in classroom assessment are generallysmall, and they are seldom used for developing or acquiring tools that yielddiagnostic information useful for planning instruction. The practice of indi-vidual teachers determining what their students should achieve and using theirown criteria for judging student performance has been guarded by administra-tors and teacher leaders in the name of teacher autonomy and perpetuated bythe challenge of finding resources to support time for collaborative planning oranalysis of student work.
True instructional leadership obliges administrators and teacher leaders tofully understand the demands of standards-based reform, and then establish theorganizational norms and practices through which teachers learn these skills.Isolation prevents teachers from developing shared standards, from knowing thereal potential of students, and from learning with and from each other in pro-ductive ways. Administrators and teacher leaders bring a unique cross-classroomperspective that can be used to start breaking down this isolation. They canbegin by bringing the work of some teachers to the attention of others andfacilitating the convening of teachers with shared interests, needs, and concerns.Instructional leaders must seek and reallocate resources to provide time forteachers to collaborate and plan collective action. But perhaps most importantly,they must use their leadership skills to focus that collaboration and action on theissues of instruction most likely to make a difference in student performance.
To help instructional leaders and teachers become attuned to identifying theskills of effective standards-based instruction in practice, Chapter Two includestwo classroom vignettes that illustrate teachers using many of the skills listedearlier. "Ben Fryer" illustrates a primary grade language arts lesson, while "MegTipple" illustrates similar teaching skills, but in a secondary classroom. Follow-ing these vignettes, in Chapter Three, is a discussion of some of the ways schoolleaders can provide opportunities for teachers to learn to incorporate these skillsin their own classroom practice.
2D__ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 26
CHAPTER TWO
1identifying Teacher Skillsin Practice
F INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS ARE TO FOSTER THE TEACHING
skills necessary for effective standards-based instruction, it is not enoughthat they have a list of those skills. They must be able to recognize when teachers
are and are not using them effectively and identify gradations of quality in
teaching performance. What, for example, do we really expect when we say thatteachers should "communicate standards to students?" Is it sufficient that ateacher tells students how many pages their essay should be? If we saw a rubric or
scoring guide posted on the bulletin board, would that be considered evidence ofhaving met expectations? The Western Assessment Collaborative's (WAC) workargues that the only sufficient evidence that the teacher has adequately communi-cated the standards to the students is when students themselves can describe andillustrate what is expected of them. Instructional leaders must internalize exem-plars of effective classroom practice so that they can make accurate judgmentsabout, and give useful feedback to, the teachers with whom they work.
To help instructional leaders begin the process of internalizing pictures ofeffective standards-based teaching, this chapter provides two vignettes of class-room practice. The first vignette illustrates the teacher's skills as they play out in
a primary grade language arts unit; the second illustrates similar teaching skills in
a secondary school setting. Each one illustrates how the teacher conducts a unit
of instruction that has been planned backwards from the performance standards
27_21
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
to which students will be held accountable. We see these two teachers over thecourse of several days, getting a chance to hear what they say to students andwhat work they ask students to do. In each vignette, we will see how the teachercommunicates specific performance expectations to students; plans the lessons inthe unit so students learn and practice the skills required of them; assesses
student learning in advance of, during, and at the conclusion of the unit; anduses data from those assessments to guide his or her instruction.
In the column to the right of the narrative, under the heading "Theteacher...," we have identified the specific skills and practices the teacher is usingthat exemplify powerful standards-based teaching strategies. We have not at-tempted to identify everything the teacher does well. Rather, we have focused onidentifying examples of the pedagogical knowledge and skills described in theprevious chapter. Neither vignette is offered as a model lesson. Because thesestories do not capture everything the teacher does, or the work the studentsproduce, it is impossible to judge the effectiveness of the units as a whole. (TheAppendix includes versions of these same vignettes that can be used as profes-sional development activities to help teachers and administrators practice identi-fying and naming these skills.)
2822_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
INSTRUCTIONAL VIGNETTE: BEN FRYER
XacAin7 hird graders &V.& a leporl informalion
Ben Fryer teaches third grade. His class of 22 studentsincludes 10 native English speakers and 12 whose homelanguage is Spanish. Of those 12 students, 5 are consideredfluent in English while the others range from moderately tonearly fluent. All students do their writing in English. Stu-dents are assigned seats so that each working group includessome English-only students and others that represent the
range of fluency.
Ben's students have just returned from early morning recessand have gone directly to their seats. They know the routinewell; it's Writing Time. Today, Ben has asked for the
class's attention.
Today, we are going to begin a new unit in writing. For thelast two weeks, during our reading time we have been learn-ing to recognize fiction and nonfiction. As he speaks, Benpoints to the words he has written on the board fiction
and nonfiction and, in Spanish, ficcion and no ficcion. Hementions how much the Spanish words sound and look likethe English words.
We learned that not all writing tells a story. Sometimesauthors write to share information. We learned that infiction, the author tells a story about a set of characters.In nonfiction, the author writes about a subject so that thereader can learn the facts about that topic. We learned thatCharlotte's Web is fiction. It tells a story about a pig namedWilber. We also looked at All About Pigs. It is nonfiction.It is about pigs, too. But instead of telling a story about oneparticular pig, it gives information about many kinds of pigs:where they live, what they eat, how they are alike anddifferent from each other.
Sometimes the title of a story or book gives us a clue about
whether it is fiction or nonfiction. Look at the question I have
written on the board and tell me which answer is correct:
29
The teacher...
establishes standards of
behavior by establishing
routines
connects the new lesson to
previous learning
supports English language
learners by providing key
vocabulary in their first language
anticipates typical
misconceptions
checks understanding of
prerequisite knowledge
_23.IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
Which of the following books is likely to be an example ofnonfiction?
A. Black Beauty
B. My Friend, FlickaC. The Facts About Horses
As Ben reads the question aloud, he holds up the cover foreach of the books. The cover illustrations provide his English
learners with additional clues about the nature of each book.
Today we are going to begin to learn about writing our ownnonfiction. One kind of nonfiction is "a report." Ben writesthe word "report" next to the word "nonfiction," first inEnglish and then in Spanish, as he says the words aloud.
To write a report, the author collects lots of information abouta subject and writes it so that others can learn about thatsubject by reading his report. Writing a report is a good wayto tell others what you know or have learned about something.
When we are finished, each of you will be able to write areport about an animal you are interested in. (An example ofBen Fryer's Unit Plan is included at the end of this vignette.)
To get started, I brought us some examples of animal reports
done by other students. We are going to look at them andthink about how they can help us learn about good reports ornonfiction writing. Let's read Paper A together. As we read it,think about how the paper helps you learn about dolphins.(A copy of the two exemplars Ben will use are included at theend of this vignette.)
Ben reads the paper aloud while projecting it on the overheadand asks students to follow along on the copies he has handedout to them. On the handout, under key nouns and verbs inthe report, he has written each word in Spanish. I'd like eachof you to think of at least one way that the author of Paper Ahelps us learn about dolphins. After pausing, Ben asks Jeff toshare the one thing he thought about.
"The author tells what dolphins eat."
24ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
introduces students to the
ways skills may be assessed on
large-scale assessments
supports English learners with
visual clues
repeats key ideas
communicates belief that all
students can and will meet
expectations
provides both aural and visual
access to the content
supports English learners by
providing key vocabulary in
their first language
Ben writes, "tells what the dolphin eats" on a wall charttitled, "What makes a good animal report?"
Ben then gives students two minutes to underline two otherfacts in the report they have read and to share those with apartner. This work in pairs allows time for his Englishlearners to practice what Jeff has modeled. Ben then calls onstudents who want to add to the chart. When possible, asBen writes on the chart, he draws an icon over a key verb ornoun to illustrate its meaning for those students less familiarwith English vocabulary.
OK, so there are a couple of things we think make this papera good report. Now let's look at Paper B. It is a report abouthorses. I will read this to you as you follow along. As you readthe paper, think about what makes this a good report.
After reviewing the second paper, the children offer thefollowing additional criteria:
The sentences are facts.
The author shows that he knows a lot about theanimal.
The author uses good words to help the reader
understand.The ideas in the report are not all mixed up.The writing is neat and the paragraphs are indented.
Most of the words are spelled correctly.
As these criteria are offered, Ben stops to show the studentsspecific examples of each characteristic in the sample papers.Sometimes he contrasts the characteristic with a specificexample from the weaker paper.
When Caleb says that the "ideas in the report are not allmixed up," Ben stops to show the class what Caleb means.Look at Paper B. Can you see that the author tells threethings about what horses eat and puts those three ideastogether in the same paragraph?As he points out these threesentences, he draws the icon for eating next to each to showthey are about the same thing. He has another whole para-graph about where horses live. As he says this, Ben points tothis paragraph on the overhead and reads the sentences
31
draws quality criteria from
students
after providing model,
allows students to generate
own language, in this case,
facts about animals in their
own words
provides visuals to support
English learners
provides both aural and visual
access to the content
records criteria in language
students can understand
contrasts exemplars to
illustrate when quality criteria
have been met and when they
have not
illustrates ideas with specific
examples from student work
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
aloud. Now, let's look again at Paper A. This author also tellsmore than one fact about his animal, but notice that he saysone thing about where dolphins live. Then he tells somethingabout what dolphins eat. Then he has another sentence abouthow they can get sick. His ideas are all mixed up instead ofbeing grouped into paragraphs.
When the students have exhausted their list of qualitycriteria, Ben points to one or two of his own. I also liked thefact that the author who wrote Paper B wrote a topicsentence to tell what the paragraph was about. Look at thethird paragraph. The first sentence tells us that this will beabout what horses eat.
When we are finished with the unit on writing nonfictionreports, you are going to be able to write your own reportthat does all of these things. I will leave this chart on the wallso that when you write your own report, you can check to seethat it does all these things.
Today, we are going to take the first step in preparing towrite our report. Reports can be about anything an authorwants to write about, but the report we are going to write forpractice in this unit is a report about an animal. So, today,we want to spend some time thinking about what animal wewill write about.
Ben has the students work in trios at their table groups tocome up with a list of animals about which they may wantto write reports. Students are encouraged to offer their ideasin either Spanish or English.
After five minutes, Ben brings the students together and eachgroup shares its ideas. As they do, he writes the name of theanimal, first in English and then in Spanish, under the letterthe word begins with. The list of animals is duplicated foreach student and the children are assigned to take the listhome and talk with their parents about what animal theymight want to write about. Ben sends the note below homein both Spanish and English, describing the assignment tothe parents or guardians. He also leaves the same message inboth languages on his homework voicemail.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
ensures that all quality criteria
are shared
stretches expectations for
students beyond what they
already know
creates resources that help
students assess their own
learning and develop
independence
has students generate
language and brainstorm
topics as part of prewriting
"evens the playing field" by
offering all students a
selection of topics
facilitates parent support by
providing messages in home
language
32
Dear Parents and Guardians,
Today, we started a unit on writing reports. When wefinish the unit, every student will be able to write areport about an animal showing that he or she:
knows the difference between reports and stories;
can organize his or her writing into paragraphs;
can help the reader understand interesting facts about
the topic; andcan use correct punctuation and spelling so the reader
can understand what is written.
We will also get to practice finding information or factsby talking with others and by using books, magazines,
and the Internet.
Tonight, I would like you to help your child choose ananimal to write about. I've attached the list of animalswe thought of today in class. Help your child choose ananimal that he or she is interested in, knows about, orwants to know more about. You might also want toguide your child to write about an animal you knowsomething about so you can help him or her. Pleasehave your child write the name of the animal he or shewill be writing about on the line below.
Thank you for helping your child,
Mr. Fryer
The second day....
Ben begins the writing period by asking the class to brain-storm in small groups what they might like to find out in areport about an animal. He reminds the class that reportsshould help the reader answer questions he or she might haveabout the topic. After allowing five minutes for the studentsto generate their own ideas, he calls on various students andrecords their thoughts on a wall chart that will hang in theclassroom for the duration of the unit. The chart includesquestions such as:
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
33
communicates expectations
to parents
invites parents to support
student learning
facilitates students' access to
information but does notmake students' success
dependent on parent support
helps students imagine an
audience and generate ideas
about what would interestthat audience
provides resources students
will need to workindependently
_17IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
What does the animal eat?
Where does it live?
When Carlos offers, "I want to know about los colores ysize," Ben says, Carlos wants to know what the animal lookslike, and writes, "What color is it?" and "How big is it?" onthe chart.
Ben then introduces a book on kangaroos and says that thisbook is a report about kangaroos. He shows everyone thepages that address the various questions they have just asked,with pictures of the kangaroo showing its size and color,what it eats, and where it lives. Having introduced the bookwith this brief picture walk so that his English learners knowwhat to expect, he then asks the students to listen as he readsaloud so they can identify any other questions aboutkangaroos the book might help them answer. After hearingthe book aloud, students add the following questions to thelist of topics to address in their reports:
How does the animal move?
What does it look like when it is born?Do people use this animal for a pet or for work?
Ben then asks his students what other kinds of informationthey might want to know about kangaroos. All questions areadded to the wall chart.
After each student has selected a topic for his or her animalreport, Ben provides lessons on finding information. Heinvites the students to collect facts by interviewing theirparents or other adults. He also introduces various textsources, such as encyclopedias, nonfiction text, andmagazines at all reading levels, as well as introducing hisstudents to the Internet. Students are told to use thesevarious sources to find facts for their reports. They arereminded to look for information that will help them answerthe kinds of questions listed on the wall chart. With each ofthese sources, Ben demonstrates how to use titles, tables ofcontents, chapter headings, and indexes to locate informa-tional text.
2-13_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
repeats students' questions in
the form of a correct Englishmodel
uses a text model of the
genre students will be writing
helps students establish their
own purpose for writing
models actions expected of
students
models reading strategies
appropriate to the genre:
nonfiction
34
Ben knows that mastering use of these structural features oftext is a third-grade standard. He also understands that,because students will be doing their research both in classand outside of class, the report-writing activity will notprovide adequate opportunity for him to assess whether allstudents have mastered this standard. However, he recognizesthat the activity offers students an important opportunity topractice using these materials. He makes note that he willneed to develop specific assessments of this third-gradestandard at another time.
Ben explains that each time students find out a fact abouttheir animal, they are to write it on a sentence strip. Benmodels this by drawing from the earlier read-aloud session tomake two sentence strips that tell facts about kangaroos. Ashe writes the model sentences, he reminds students aboutpast lessons on sentence writing.
Remember that we said a sentence needs to be a completethought. So when we write a fact about the kangaroo, wedon't write "moves fast." Instead, we want to write,"Kangaroos move very fast."
Ben uses sentence strips so that when his students are readyto organize their writing into paragraphs later in the unit,they will understand that writers often "move ideas around"to make their writing more comprehensible. Students will beasked to physically group the sentences to form paragraphs.
Students are told that they will be collecting facts for the nextfour or five days. Ben suggests that students set a goal offinding two facts a day, from any source they can. He makessure the classroom contains many resources, in both Spanishand English, about different animals. He lets students knowthat he will be available before and after school to help themuse the classroom resources.
Ben expects that most of his students will draw on materialsin the classroom library or interview a parent to get informa-tion for their reports. But he suspects that some studentsmay be ready to explore a variety of other sources. Althoughhe does not plan to hold all students accountable for using
35
models actions expected
of students
recalls prerequisite skills
previously taught
has strong pedagogical
content knowledge that
facilitates the teaching of
critical skills
sets goals to help students
monitor their own progress
provides resources that give
all students the opportunityto perform
has a system for recording
and tracking student progress
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
multiple sources at this time, he makes note of those stu-dents already able to do it. In preparation for learning tobuild a bibliography, he has those students write the type ofsource used on the back of their sentence strip.
The next several days....
Throughout the week, Ben sets up a number of opportuni-ties for students to share some of what they are finding out.For example, when dismissing students to lunch he asks forvolunteers to tell one fact about "what your animal eats" or"where your animal lives." Students are dismissed when theyoffer an example. When taking roll, he asks students to holdup the sentence strips they made the day before. It is a quickand easy way to see which students are having difficultyfinding and recording facts.
Writing time on each of the following days is used to teach amini lesson on one of the characteristics required in the finalreport. Ben plans and conducts lessons on:
organizing sentences dealing with the same topic intoparagraphs, writing a topic sentence, and indenting thefirst line; and
using descriptive language or the strategy of "showing,
not telling" to help the reader better understand.
Each of Ben's mini lessons starts with a reminder of thequality criteria and a look at the original exemplars for areminder of what that skill or characteristic looks like whendone correctly and/or how the weaker example might bemade better. Students are then given several practice exercisesto work on alone or in small groups. Ben models completingone or more of the practice exercises before asking studentsto work. As they complete the exercises, Ben circulatesaround the room to clarify instructions, coach individualstudents, and look at the work they are producing to ensurethat each student is being successful.
As homework, students are given a few practice exercisessimilar to those done in class. To prepare students for howthese same skills might be addressed on large-scale assess-
ments, Ben also gives them some multiple-choice problems
an_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
provides opportunities forstudents to perform beyond
what is expected of all
uses routines to reinforce
skills
monitors students' workefficiently
plans lessons to address all
skills required in final
assessment
connects lesson to the
expectations for student
performance, using exemplars
provides guided practice
before asking students to try
independently
38
addressing the skills. (Classroom practice exercises andhomework for the two mini lessons are included at the endof this vignette.)
Ben uses his observations of student work both classwork
and homework to decide whether students are ready to usea new skill on their own in their reports and, if not, to diag-nose what they do not understand. When necessary, he pullsstudents having similar difficulties into a small ad hoc groupto clear up misconceptions and/or reteach the new skill.
While watching students complete exercises on organizingsentences into paragraphs, Ben notes that although most ofhis English learners and even some students who are fluent inEnglish understand the concept of organizing around a singletopic, they do not include transition phrases between sen-tences or between paragraphs. He makes a note to pull thesestudents aside for a special lesson on transition phrases.
The classroom assessment....
Ben has completed his unit and feels his students are ready totry their hand at writing their animal reports. He gives theclass a prompt (see below), reads it over with them, answersquestions, and then tells them they will have two classperiods to write their first draft.
Assignment
Write a report on the animal you have been learningabout. Your report should have at least three para-graphs. You do not need to use all the facts that youfound. Pick the ones you think are most interesting toshare. Your grade will depend on how well you:
provide information about your animal and organize it
into paragraphs;
help your reader understand information about youranimal by showing, not just telling; andhelp your reader understand what you have to say by
using correct spelling, punctuation, and indentation ofparagraphs.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
=
37
gives students opportunities
to practice various forms of
the assessment
uses student work todiagnose needs
circles back to students who
need additional support
gives clear directions about
what will be expected on the
assessment
shares in advance the criteria
on which student work willbe judged
holds students accountable
only for what they have been
taught
_31IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
The students are told that they should work by themselves as
much as possible, but that they can ask for help from a
friend or from the teacher if necessary. They are free to use
any resources in the room for assistance, including thedictionary or their initial research materials. Ben plans tonote the type of assistance requested by students. In eachcase, he will ask himself whether the request indicates a lackof understanding or confidence, or whether it simplyindicates interest in gathering ideas from others.
At the close of the second day, Ben collects the papers fromthe entire class.
assesses the degree to which
students can work
independently, but scaffolds so
that every student can
participate in the assessment
The student work, worksheets, and plans on the following pages illustrate that the teacher also:
creates long-range and short-range plans that are appropriately sequenced;
plans unit to address all skills needed in final assessment;
develops homework tasks that can be done independently;
makes sure homework exposes students to ways in which the skill will be assessedon tests;
creates class worksheets that provide models of good responses; and
ensures that both classwork and homework provide a variety of ways for students todemonstrate the same skill.
32_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
33
Tea
chin
g E
xem
plar
s
Pap
er A
- B
ottle
nose
Dol
phin
s
Its h
abita
t is
salt
wat
er. D
olph
ins
are
foun
d in
coas
tal w
ater
s ar
ound
the
wor
ld. T
hey
eat i
nsho
refis
h lik
e ca
pelin
, anc
hovy
, sal
mon
, and
shr
imp.
Dol
-ph
ins
can
eat 6
feet
und
er w
ater
and
can
sta
y do
wn
for
15 m
inut
es. S
omet
imes
dol
phin
s ge
t sic
k fr
ompo
llutio
n.
Dol
phin
s ca
n liv
e up
to 5
0 ye
ars.
Its
coat
issm
ooth
and
like
rub
ber.
A d
olph
in is
a m
amm
al. D
ol-
phin
s ea
t up
to fo
ur p
ound
of f
ish
a da
y.
Whe
n do
lphi
ns s
leep
, the
fem
ale
slee
ps o
n to
p of
the
wat
er a
nd th
e m
ale
slee
ps o
n th
e bo
ttom
. Whe
nth
e m
ale
need
s ai
r, it
goe
s up
to th
e to
p th
e w
ater
toge
t it a
nd th
en it
goe
s ba
ck d
own.
Som
e pe
ople
let b
allo
on g
o an
d th
ey g
o in
to th
eoc
ean.
Dol
phin
s th
ink
it is
food
and
eat
it a
nd c
an d
ie.
Oth
er p
ollu
tion
like
gas
and
soda
can
s ca
n hu
rt d
ol-
phin
s. W
hen
a do
lphi
n is
sic
k it
crie
s to
get
hel
p fr
omot
her
dolp
hins
who
try
to h
elp
it to
the
top
so it
can
brea
the.
We
can
help
dol
phin
s by
not
pol
lutin
g th
eoc
ean.
Pap
er B
- H
orse
s
I cho
se h
orse
s be
caus
e I l
ike
to r
ide
them
. Ial
so li
ke to
pet
them
. Hor
ses
are
very
nic
e an
d th
eylik
e to
be
pette
d to
o. T
hey
have
long
hai
r on
thei
rne
ck a
nd ta
il. T
he h
air
dow
n th
eir
neck
is c
alle
d a
man
e. It
is fu
n to
bru
sh th
eir
man
e an
d ta
il.
Hor
ses
are
very
fun
to r
ide.
At t
he c
amp
I go
toev
eryb
ody
gets
to h
ave
hors
e ba
ck r
idin
g le
sson
s.W
hen
you
ride
a ho
rse
you
need
to p
ut a
sad
dle
on it
sba
ck. S
ome
peop
le r
ide
bare
bac
k bu
t onl
y if
they
are
real
ly g
ood.
Hor
ses
also
wea
r sh
oes
on th
eir
feet
.P
eopl
e pu
t sho
es o
n th
eir
feet
so
thei
r fe
et w
ont g
etso
re w
hen
they
wal
k an
d ru
n.
Hor
ses
eat m
any
diffe
rent
thin
gs. H
orse
s ea
tha
y, g
rass
, bar
ley
and
oats
. Oat
mea
l is
thei
r fa
vorit
efo
od b
ecau
se it
giv
es th
em a
lot o
f ene
rgy.
The
y al
solo
ve c
arro
ts, a
pple
s, m
olas
ses
and
suga
r cu
bes.
Som
e-tim
es th
eir
owne
rs w
ill g
ive
them
a b
lock
of s
alt t
om
ake
them
thirs
ty s
o th
ey w
ill d
rink
enou
gh w
ater
.
Mos
t hor
ses
live
on fa
rms
or r
anch
es, b
ut s
ome
hors
es a
re w
ild. W
ild h
orse
s liv
e on
flat
gra
ssla
nds
whe
re th
ey g
raze
and
they
are
abl
e to
sur
vive
har
dw
eath
er. T
here
are
not
ver
y m
any
wild
hor
ses
any-
mor
e be
caus
e m
ost o
f the
m h
ave
been
trai
ned
bype
ople
.
Prerequisite LearningExperiences
Distinguish fiction andnonfictionRead several examples
of nonfiction/reports
V'Standards to be Assessed
Create a single paragraph
Develop a topic sentenceInclude simple facts and
supporting details
Write descriptions that useconcrete sensory details topresent and supportunified impressions ofpeople, places, or things
Indent paragraphs, use
appropriate punctuationand capitalization of simplesentences
Standards to be PracticedDistinguish common formsof literature (e.g., fiction,nonfiction)Use titles, tables ofcontents, chapter headings,
glossaries, and indexes to
locate information in textDemonstrate comprehensionby answering questions fromtext
Unit Plan Report of Information
AssessmentStudents will independently
write a multi-paragraph reporton animals using information
gathered from various text andother resources
Criteria for Success
Gather facts from at leastone source
Organize writing inparagraphs/topic sentences
Use sensory details
to describe
Use appropriate conventions
3_4_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
IIINIMMO
4-
1-I-
ft,
Requisite Opportunitiesto Learn
Lessons and Practice:
Identifying sources of information
Using structural features of text,titles, subtitles, index, etc.
Identifying relevant types of
information about animals
Concept of paragraph/
Purpose for reader
Identifying topic sentences
Grouping sentences on same
topicOrdering sentences and
paragraphs
Composing topic sentences to
indicate main idea and transitions
for reader
Identifying descriptive words
Writing "showing" not "telling"sentences
Norms for indentation
Punctuation/capitalization of
simple sentences
Sentence construction
4 0
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Exe
rcis
e an
d H
omew
ork
Org
aniz
ing
Sen
tenc
es In
to P
arag
raph
s
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Org
aniz
ing
Sen
tenc
es in
to P
arag
raph
s an
d W
ritin
ga
Top
ic S
ente
nce
1. R
ead
each
of y
our
sent
ence
str
ips
and
lay
them
out
so
that
you
can
see
them
all
at o
ne ti
me.
2. P
ut y
our
sent
ence
str
ips
into
gro
ups
by to
pic.
All
fact
sab
out w
hat y
our
anim
al e
ats,
for
exam
ple,
sho
uld
be in
one
grou
p. A
ll fa
cts
abou
t wha
t you
r an
imal
look
s lik
e sh
ould
be
in a
noth
er g
roup
.
3. R
ead
the
sent
ence
s in
one
gro
up. W
hat i
s th
e m
ain
idea
of
thes
e se
nten
ces?
Wha
t sen
tenc
e ca
n yo
u pu
t in
fron
t of
thes
e se
nten
ces
to te
ll w
hat t
hey
are
all a
bout
? W
rite
your
mai
n id
ea s
ente
nce
on a
sen
tenc
e st
rip u
sing
a r
ed m
arke
r.C
lip a
ll th
e se
nten
ces
on th
at to
pic
toge
ther
with
the
mai
nid
ea o
n to
p or
at t
he e
nd o
f you
r se
t.
4. If
you
hav
e fa
cts
that
don
't fit
in a
ny g
roup
, you
hav
e a
choi
ce to
mak
e.M
aybe
they
sta
nd a
lone
as
thei
r ow
n pa
ragr
aph.
May
be y
ou w
ill w
ant t
o w
rite
one
or tw
o m
ore
fact
s on
that
topi
c to
go
with
them
.Y
ou m
ight
dec
ide
not t
o us
e th
em in
you
r re
port
.
5. T
ake
one
of th
e pa
ragr
aphs
you
will
use
in y
our
repo
rt a
ndw
rite
it on
a s
epar
ate
piec
e of
pap
er. T
urn
the
pape
r in
at
the
end
of th
e w
ritin
g pe
riod.
Hom
ewor
kO
rgan
izin
g S
ente
nces
into
Par
agra
phs
and
Writ
ing
a T
opic
Sen
tenc
e
1. W
hich
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow te
lls th
e m
ain
idea
of t
hepa
ragr
aph?
Hou
ses
can
be b
uilt
with
man
y di
ffere
nt ty
pes
of m
ater
ials
.S
ome
hous
es a
re b
uilt
with
bric
ks a
nd s
ome
are
built
with
cem
ent.
In th
e ol
den
days
, hou
ses
wer
e bu
ilt w
ith lo
gs.
The
se w
ere
calle
d lo
g ca
bins
. Hou
ses
can
be b
uilt
with
man
ydi
ffere
nt ty
pes
of m
ater
ials
. In
som
e co
untr
ies,
peo
ple
use
mud
to m
ake
thei
r ho
mes
. Igl
oos,
whi
ch a
re o
nly
in v
ery
cold
pla
ces,
are
hou
ses
that
are
mad
e of
ice.
A. I
n th
e ol
den
days
, hou
ses
wer
e bu
ilt w
ith lo
gs.
B. H
ouse
s ca
n be
bui
lt w
ith m
any
diffe
rent
type
s of
mat
eria
ls.
C. S
ome
hous
es a
re b
uilt
with
bric
ks a
nd s
ome
are
built
with
cem
ent.
2. W
hich
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow d
oes
not s
eem
to b
elon
g in
the
para
grap
h? W
hy?
The
Wrig
ht b
roth
ers
inve
nted
the
airp
lane
in 1
903.
Bac
kth
en, a
irpla
nes
used
pro
pelle
rs. T
oday
, airp
lane
s us
e je
ten
gine
s. A
irpla
nes
are
also
muc
h fa
ster
toda
y th
an th
ey u
sed
to b
e. T
he fi
rst t
hing
you
may
not
ice
abou
t a p
lane
is th
ew
ings
that
stic
k ou
t on
eith
er s
ide
of it
s lo
ng b
ody.
Peo
ple
can
trav
el a
roun
d th
e w
orld
in o
nly
a fe
w h
ours
. Airp
lane
sha
ve im
prov
ed a
lot s
ince
they
wer
e fir
st in
vent
ed.
A. A
irpla
nes
have
impr
oved
a lo
t sin
ce th
ey w
ere
first
inve
nted
.B
. The
Wrig
ht b
roth
ers
inve
nted
the
airp
lane
in 1
903.
C. T
he fi
rst t
hing
you
may
not
ice
abou
t a p
lane
is th
ew
ings
that
stic
k ou
t on
eith
er s
ide
of it
s lo
ng b
ody.
0 r; H 0 z -I m m z m 0 3 0 m m z
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Exe
rcis
e an
d H
omew
ork
Sho
win
g, N
ot T
ellin
g
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Sho
win
g, N
ot T
ellin
g
Bel
ow y
ou a
re g
iven
thre
e ex
ampl
es o
f sen
tenc
es th
at "
show
,no
t jus
t tel
l" ab
out a
topi
c. P
ract
ice
writ
ing
"sho
w, n
ot ju
stte
ll" s
ente
nces
for
each
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow. S
omet
imes
whe
n yo
u ex
plai
n so
met
hing
by
"sho
win
g" it
in w
ords
, you
will
wan
t to
writ
e m
ore
than
one
sen
tenc
e.
Exa
mpl
e A
:T
ell:
Bird
s ca
n be
ver
y no
isy.
Sho
w: S
omet
imes
a b
ird w
ill s
quaw
k fo
r ho
urs
with
out t
akin
g a
brea
k.
Exa
mpl
e B
:T
ell:
The
tree
was
tall.
Sho
w: T
he to
p of
the
tree
rea
ched
the
four
th s
tory
win
dow
on th
e bu
ildin
g ne
xt d
oor.
Exa
mpl
e C
:T
ell:
The
witc
h w
as u
gly.
Sho
w: T
he w
itch'
s fa
ce w
as w
rinkl
ed. H
e ha
d on
e re
d ey
e an
dw
arts
all
over
his
nos
e.
Pra
ctic
e A
:T
ell:
The
pup
py w
as c
ute.
Sho
w:
Pra
ctic
e B
:T
ell:
Sam
anth
a is
mea
n.S
how
:
Pra
ctic
e C
:T
ell:
Che
etah
s ru
n ve
ry fa
st.
Sho
w:
Pra
ctic
e b:
Tel
l: T
urtle
s m
ove
very
slo
wly
.S
how
:
Hom
ewor
kS
how
ing,
Not
Tel
ling
Mr.
Kel
ly s
lam
med
his
fist
on
the
tabl
e an
d sc
ream
ed u
ntil
his
face
got
red
.
1. T
he s
ente
nce
abov
e sh
ows
that
:A
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
bore
d.B
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
angr
y.C
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
telli
ng a
joke
.
The
prin
cess
had
hun
dred
s of
bea
utifu
l dre
sses
and
lots
of je
wel
s.
2. T
he s
ente
nce
abov
e sh
ows
that
:A
. The
prin
cess
was
pro
babl
y ric
h.B
. The
prin
cess
was
pro
babl
y yo
ung.
C. T
he p
rince
ss w
as p
roba
bly
good
at p
layi
ng te
nnis
.
Whi
ch o
f the
sen
tenc
es b
elow
are
the
best
exa
mpl
es o
fse
nten
ces
that
sho
w th
at:
3. E
leph
ants
are
big
ani
mal
s.A
. Ele
phan
ts e
at g
rass
and
hay
.B
. Ele
phan
ts w
alk
toge
ther
in p
acks
.C
. Ele
phan
ts s
tand
twel
ve fe
et ta
ll an
d ca
n w
eigh
mor
e th
ana
ton!
4. S
ea o
tters
use
tool
s.A
. Sea
otte
rs li
e on
thei
r ba
cks
and
crac
k sh
ells
ope
n by
poun
ding
a r
ock
agai
nst t
he s
hell
whi
le it
res
ts o
n th
eir
ches
t.B
. Sea
otte
rs s
wim
in th
e co
ol w
ater
nea
r th
e co
ast.
C. S
ea o
tters
are
ver
y pl
ayfu
l.
Pra
ctic
e:W
rite
one
of th
e fa
cts
you
colle
cted
abo
ut y
our
anim
al b
elow
.
Und
erne
ath
that
sen
tenc
e, w
rite
anot
her
sent
ence
(or
mor
e)th
at h
elps
you
r re
ader
"se
e" w
hat y
ou m
ean
usin
g w
ords
that
pain
t a b
ette
r pi
ctur
e of
the
fact
you
hav
e ch
osen
.
INSTRUCTIONAL VIGNETTE: MEG TIPPLE
XacAin7 Cievend graciers folise .Ircenfars
As the students in Meg Tipple's seventh-grade math classenter the classroom, they note the "sponge" assignmentwritten on the board, get out their math notebooks, andbegin writing to the prompt: "Write down everything youcan say about 30%." After quickly taking roll, Meg circulatesaround the room, noting the terminology students use intheir quick-writes, and then she calls for students' attention.
As part of our focus this quarter on being informed consum-ers, you have compared rates and unit prices to investigateadvertising claims, and you have used ratios and proportionsto plan a main course and an appetizer for a large dinnercelebration. Today, we are beginning a unit on percentages.(A copy of Meg's unit plan is included at the end of thisvignette. The vignette covers section 3 of the unit plan.) Megmoves to a chart on the wall labeled, "What math is involvedin being an educated consumer?" and adds the word "per-cents" to the chart.
At the end of this part of the unit, you will show what youhave learned by planning an athletic banquet within a setbudget. You will have to make decisions about planning amenu, selecting entertainment, and purchasing awards,decorations, and gifts for the coaches. During the unit, youwill have lots of opportunities to work together, but each ofyou will need to plan the awards banquet on your own. So itis important for you to take responsibility for your ownlearning by asking questions as we go along when there issomething you don't understand.
She shows students a chart listing the criteria on which theirathletic awards banquet project will be judged. You will need to:
correctly use fractional benchmarks to estimatepercents;use counting and rounding to estimate percents;accurately analyze data represented in a circle graph;correctly calculate savings in a percent-off sale;make a plan that is within your budget; andprecisely construct a circle graph to representpercents.
43
The teacher....
establishes routines and
standards for behavior
uses quick-write routine tobegin assessing students'
prior knowledge
connects new learning to
real-world skills and previous
lessons
shares up-front how students
will be assessed
communicates belief that all
students will meet
expectations
encourages students to take
responsibility for their own
learning
shares criteria on whichstudent work will be judged
-31IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
Next, she begins a class discussion about percents asking:What is a percent?
Where have you seen percents used in everyday situations?How do percents relate to fractions? Decimals?
How many students would make up 100% of your mathclass? 50%? 25%?
Students share their ideas aloud in the large group and,though many of them struggle to make their ideas clear, Megis confident that they are familiar with the basic conceptsthey need to proceed with the unit.
She gives the students a worksheet and has students work inpairs to estimate which answer best completes each state-ment. After giving them time to work together on the sevenworksheet problems, she has them answer questions A and Bindependently.
Select one of the estimates on the right to fill in each of thesesentences: In our math class
1. of thestudents are left-handed.
2. of thestudents have brown hair.
3. of thestudents like pizza.
4. of thestudents are wearingsneakers today.
5. of thestudents are 12 years old.
6. of thestudents have summerbirthdays.
7. of thestudents like football.
-fewer than 10%-fewer than 50%-more than 50%-at least 90%about 25%
-about 50%-about 75%100%
A. How did you decide whichpercentage to use with eachstatement?
B. How could you check your
estimates?
While students work in pairs, Meg circulates, asking studentsquestions about their estimates and the strategies they usedto come up with those estimates. During this time, shemakes notes on a class list about students' understanding ofthe meaning of percents, their familiarity with estimating
BEST COPY AVAILABLE3.13_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
checks for understanding of
prerequisite skills
uses a variety of grouping
strategies as well as some
individual accountability
continues to assess prior
knowledge
4.4
percents, and their understanding of the relationship amongdecimals, fractions, and percents.
Meg notices that as students try to select the percent thatmakes each statement true, some students make commentslike "not very many so let's pick 10%," or "most students sowhat's the largest percent," or "about half and half" as theyestimate the number of students and match it to a percentagestatement. Others guess with no apparent strategy.
As a result of these observations, Meg decides to spend a fewminutes reviewing with the class the relationship of fractionalparts to percents and helping them see how to use familiarbenchmarks like 25%, 50%, and 75% to make estimates.She tells students that estimating a percent is much the sameas estimating a fractional part of something. She holds upfraction circles representing 1/5, 1/3, 3/8, etc. and asksstudents to name the fraction and then determine whetherthe fraction represents a percent nearer to 25%, 50%, 75%,or 100% of the whole. As students offer correct responses,she asks them to explain how they made their estimate andthen repeats their explanation in her own words to providethe class with models of good problem solving. In each case,she points out how the students used the familiar bench-marks of 25%, 50%, or 75% to make their estimate.
Next, Meg gives each student a few pieces of graph paper.She asks them to outline a 10 x 10 box and shows them howto demonstrate 1/4 = 25 squares or 25% of the 100 squares.She then points to the homework assignment on the boardand tells students to copy it into their notebooks.
Homework:
On the graph paper you have been given, fill in the percent-
ages and illustrate the following fraction and percentequivalents: 1/2 = 50%, 3/4 = %, 1 whole = %, and2/5 = %.
Estimate the percentage that would be equivalent to:7/8, 2/3, and 1/6 and write an explanation of how youmade your estimate for each.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
45
systematically tracks needs of
individual students
adjusts instruction based on
observations of student
understandings and
misconceptions
designs homework to provide
independent practice of skills
taught in class
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
The second day....
Students enter the classroom and begin writing a response tothe question written on the board: A store advertised, "BestSale Ever! 10% discount on all items!" Is this a good sale?Why or why not? While students are writing, Meg looksthrough the homework that students placed in the basket bythe door, quickly eyeballing them to check on the work ofa
few students who seemed to have had difficulty in yesterday'sclass.
Meg has students quickly share their answers to the writingprompt with a partner. She then randomly picks two namesfrom the class name container (names written on Popsiclesticks) and asks those two students to share their discussionaloud with the class. She asks the rest of the class to agree,disagree, or add to the comments shared.
Meg begins today's lesson by telling the class that later in theperiod they will be given some information about a footballteam and what percent of its $20,000 budget it has spent oncertain items. From that information, students will be askedto estimate approximately how much money the team spenton each item. She reminds them that in this case they willnot be calculating to get an exact figure, but instead, estimat-ing in their heads.
Today we will continue our work with fractional benchmarksfamiliar fractions like 1/2 or 50% and 1/4 or 25% to
estimate percentages that are close to those benchmarks. Asshe says this, she points to the chart listing the criteria thatwill be used to judge the final project. This is one of the skillsyou will need to know in order to plan your banquet.
As we do this, you can think about fractional parts and use
25%, 50%, and 75% as benchmarks for checking whetheryour estimate is reasonable. In your homework, you demon-strated percents using a box divided into 100 squares. Eachsquare represented 1/100 or 1% of the whole. Look at thenumber line on the board. Let's estimate 23% of 400.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
presents familiar and authentic
problems
designs procedures and
routines for students that
facilitate ongoing assessment of
student progress
uses procedures that require all
students to be prepared to
share their thinking and justify
their answers
makes connections between
lessons and what students will
be expected to do
46
Meg demonstrates thinking aloud. In this case, 400 is the whole.
Which benchmark percent is 23% closest to? (25%) We can use
that benchmark, 25% or 1/4, to mentally figure out the amount.What is 1/4 or 25% of 400? One quarter of 400 is 100, so 23%
of 400 is a little less than 100. When we estimate, we don't need
to say exactly how much less.
After demonstrating how she solved this problem for thewhole class, Meg passes out a worksheet that includes thefollowing problems: What is 25% of 200? What is 55% of400? What is 76% of 400? What is 75% of 200? She encour-ages the students to work in pairs to figure out the answers.After giving them time to work, she calls on pairs to sharetheir responses with the whole class.
As answers are shared, a few students seem to be confused orto forget the size of the "whole." For instance, Bill says that25% of 200 is 25. Meg responds that 25 would be correct ifthe number or the whole set was 100 as it was when theyfound 25% of the 100-square graph paper box, but that nowthe whole set was 200. She prompted with the followingquestions: How many in the whole? (200) Twenty-five percent
is closest to what fraction? (1/4) What is 1/4 of 200? (50)What is 25% of 200? (50) She asks if anyone else thoughtabout this a different way, and one student says she figuredthat if 25% of 100 is 25, then 2 times 100 is 200, and so2 times 25 would make 50. Meg has students do a few moreexamples until confusions like Bill's seem to be cleared up.
Next, Meg distributes Worksheet A (included at the end ofthis vignette), and students independently begin work on it.Meg works with two students who seem to have troublegetting started, prompting them with questions to get themgoing (e.g., what benchmark percent is that closest to: 25%,50%...?). After students complete the worksheet, Meg hasthem process what they have learned by asking them to shareideas about these questions:
What methods did you use to estimate the percentage
increase in dollar amounts?
How did you decide if your estimates are reasonable?
4 7
anticipates a common
misunderstanding, making sure
students are given problems
where "a whole" is not"100"
models math strategy and
thinking process
encourages students to work
together so they will have toexplain their thinking as they
work
checks for understanding and
reteaches
encourages multiple
strategies to solve the
problems
provides students
opportunities to process
what they have learned
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
At the end of the class period, Meg collects the worksheetand students copy the homework assignment.
Homework:
There is a picture of an American Flag on page 114 in yourmath book. Estimate the percentage of the flag that is madeof stripes and the percentage that has stars in the blue area.Plan a way to verify your estimates. Be prepared to discuss
your answers at the beginning of the period tomorrow.
The third day....
Pairs share homework solutions and strategies with eachother.
Quick-Write: How would you estimate 3% of 445?
After students share ideas, Meg begins: Sometimes, like inthe problem we just worked on, the percentage we are tryingto estimate is not very close to any of the benchmarks weworked on yesterday. To estimate these, you will want to usecounting and rounding. As she says this, she again points tothe chart of criteria for the final project. Meg presents a minilesson on counting and rounding, and then reviews thisstrategy by sharing aloud a strategy for solving the problemshe gave in the quick-write. As she shares her thinking aloud,she writes these key phrases on the board:
3% means $3 for every $100
And, therefore, $1.50 for every $50
To find 3% of $445, count the number of $100s thatyou need: 4
Then you have $45 left over, which can be rounded to$50
So 3% of $445 is about 4($3) + $1.50, which equals$13.50
Meg asks students to estimate and discuss their strategies forfiguring 6% of 625 and then 8% of 650. She has them sharetheir thinking aloud, and, as they do, she writes out the stepson the board so students have a model of how to record theirmental math.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
42_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT ..
uses quick-write routine to
foreshadow skills to be taught
that day
teaches additional problem-
solving strategies
illustrates how thinking is
portrayed in written form
repeatedly models what
students will be expected
to do
4$
Next, she distributes Worksheet B (included at the end ofthis vignette), and students independently complete theactivity. As they do that, Meg circulates, prompting students,asking questions to push their thinking, asking them todescribe the strategy they used, clearing up misunderstand-ings, and looking at the work they are producing to makesure that each student is being successful. As she circulates,she makes notes for use in planning the next day's lesson.
Students who have finished their worksheet copy the home-work assignment into their notebooks and begin theirhomework.
When the rest of the class is finished with the worksheet,Meg has the students share their estimates for expenses, theamount the district will pay, and the amount for which fundsmust be raised. As students share, Meg asks for alternativeresponses and then helps students understand why there arediscrepancies by asking them to describe the mental mathstrategies they used for estimating.
Minutes before the dismissal bell rings, Meg says, Thehomework you have tonight will give you a chance to practicethe skill of counting and rounding on your own. Don't forgetto get the assignment down! (The homework is included at
the end of this vignette. )
Over the next several days....
Meg teaches lessons on the skills students will need tocomplete their final project, including (see Meg's unit plan at
the end of this vignette):converting among fractions, decimals, and percents;
interpreting data in a circle graph;
constructing a circle graph;
finding discounts and resulting sale prices;
using calculators to find sale prices;
calculating savings in a percent-off sale;
determining savings with discount coupons; and
planning a budget.
uses student work to plan
subsequent lessons
requires individual
demonstration of skills after
much guided practice
provides opportunities tolearn all prerequisite skills
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
4 9
Each day Meg begins with a reminder of how the lesson andfollow-up work will help students plan the athletic banquetwithin a set budget, referring to the criteria chart she sharedon the first day of the unit. Whenever possible, she pointsout models of the quality work she will be looking for.
After each lesson, students are given practice exercises to workon alone or in small groups. Before asking students to startwork, Meg models similar problems by showing examples orthinking aloud as she works through an exercise. As studentswork, Meg circulates around the room to clarify instructions,coach individual students, clear up misunderstandings, andlook at the work they are producing to make sure that eachstudent is being successful. When needed, she stops to reteacha concept or makes notes for use in planning the next day'slesson. As necessary, she pulls together small groups of
students having similar difficulties to clear up misconceptions.
Unit review and self-assessment....
Meg has completed the unit and believes that her studentsare just about ready for the assessment. She summarizes themajor areas of study over the past two to three weeks andtells students that they are now going to get ready to plan theathletic banquet.
When you plan your athletic banquet tomorrow, you aregoing to be given $2,500 to spend. You will know the num-ber of students and coaches who will attend and the costs for
food, entertainment, trophies, and decorations. You are goingto have to choose from among lots of different foods, types of
awards, decorations, entertainment, and gifts and staywithin your budget. When you have decided what you willbuy and how much you will spend on each, then you willmake a circle graph to illustrate how your money was spent.*As Meg explains the final project, she shows the prompt onan overhead and explains that students will each get a copyat the start of class the next day. (See Final Unit Assessmentat the end of the vignette.)
* Based on the curriculum unit, Buyer Beware, Math Scape Seeing
and Thinking Mathematically, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, 1998.
44_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
relates skills being learned to
larger learning task
shares models of expected
quality
monitors the progress of all
students and reteaches as
necessary
illustrates exactly what
students will be required to
do so that students can focus
their last-minute review
50
She points out the criteria chart for a high-level response tothis assignment and, again, reviews the criteria. For eachcriterion, she offers an example or shows a model from aprevious lesson (e.g., a good budget plan, circle graph).As she shares the model, she reminds the students of thespecific characteristics that she will be looking for in theirwork. For example, she explains: When you write up yourbudget plan, you will need to be sure that you purchaseeverything required for the banquet and that your purchasesadd up to a figure close to, but not a penny over, yourallotted budget.
So, now before you get the assignment for your final project,I want to give you some time to think about whether you areready, and if not, what other help you may need. I want youto look back over your portfolio of work from this unit andthink about the skills and criteria I have just reviewed. Canyou do all these? If not, this is your chance to get yourselfready for the final project.
You guys know the procedure for convening a study group,how to sign up for a conference with me if you need my helpwith something, and what is expected if you plan to work on
your own.
She gives students a few minutes to review their portfolioand then does a rapid roll call, asking each student to reportout how he will be using this unit review period.
The final project begins....
Meg starts the class by reviewing for the last time the criteriaon which the students' work will be judged, and then givesstudents the assignment, saying, This project puts togetherall of the skills we have been working on for the last two
weeks.
repeats criteria on which
student work will bejudged
illustrates the performance
standard by pointing out
specific characteristics in
exemplars
encourages students to
develop independence and to
take responsibility for theirown learning
establishes routines and
procedures that make it
possible for students to get
the kind of help they need
provides opportunities forstudents to assess their own
work
allows for student choice and
different learning styles as they
review unit skills
chooses to assess multiple
related standards applied in a
complex task
ASIDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
You will have two class periods to finish this task. When youare finished, I want you to take some time before you turnin your work to complete the self-assessment sheet andattach it to your project. It will ask you to commenton how you think you did in relation to each of the criteriaI just went over. Before you go home tonight, I will collectyour work in progress. I'll return it to you tomorrow, so thatyou can continue your work.
When you get your papers back, I will return them with the"Teacher Comments" page attached. (The teacher commentsare included at the end of this vignette.) It will explain howyou did on each of these criteria. Then, you will have adecision to make about whether you want to revise yourproject for additional credit.
Your work this last couple of weeks has shown me you areready for this project. I know you'll do great work!
requires that students apply the
established criteria to their own
work through self-assessment
offers a realistic time frame to
complete the assessment, but
makes sure all work is done
independently in class
provides feedback specific to
the established criteria so that
students know what is needed
to improve their work
gives students an opportunity to
revise and improve their work
communicates belief that all
students will meet expectations
The assessment, plans, and worksheets on the following pages illustrate that the teacher also:
creates long-range and short-term plans that demonstrate knowledge of content andappropriate sequencing;
plans instructional units based on content standards;
breaks down standards and articulates instructional goals in terms of what students willbe required to know and do;
designs homework and classwork sheets to provide independent practice of skillspracticed in class; and
designs assessment to provide appropriate evidence of the standards.
6_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 5
Final Unit AssessmentThe Informed Consumer: Percentages Unit*
Planning an Athletic Banquet on a BudgetYou have been given $2,500 to plan the athletic banquet. The money was donated for the banquet and that's all itcan be used for, so you need to spend close to $2,500. You can't spend more than this.
Athletic Banquet Attendance
Sport Students Coaches
Field Hockey 20 2
Football 50 3
Soccer 30 2
Tennis 16 2
Basketball 20 2
Volleyball 12 1
Cross-country 12 1
Swimming 8 1
Lacrosse 18 2
I. Use the Athletic Banquet Price List to help you plan your choices for food, entertainment, awards, decora-tions, and gifts for the coaches.
2. When you have figured out how much you will spend for each category, write your plan for what you willbe doing for each of the following: food, entertainment, awards, decorations, and gifts for the coaches.
3. Make a chart to record your total expenses in each category.4. Write down the total amount you will spend on the banquet. Tell how much money, if any, you will have
left over from the $2,500 you were given to spend.
Display Your Budget Data in a Circle GraphYou need to present the information in your banquet plan to the athletic advisory committee. Make a circle graphfor the presentation.
Use the circle on the handout, How To Construct a Circle Graph.Use percentages to label each sector of your circle graph.Make sure your sectors are clearly labeled and that the graph has a title.
Athletic Banquet Price ListGlordanno's by the Bay
Catering MenuBroiled tenderloin $5.75
Hot turkey sandwichSpaghetti with meatballs
Fried fantail shrimp
Baked vegetable lasagna
Enchiladas nortenas
Guadalajara burritoVegetable burrito
$5.25
$5.10$6.25
$5.50$6.50
$5.40$6.10
EntertainmentThe Rocksters $200 per hour
25% surcharge over 2 hours
Sammy the DJ $100 per hour50% surcharge per hour for music
of your choice
Alan's Awards ShopTrophies $5.95
25% discount on all ordersover 50
Plaques $4351/3 off on all orders over 10
Party DecorationsOutlet
$1.99 per package$2.99 per package
$3.49 per package
Streamers
Balloons
Confetti
15% off on orders over 10 packages
The Coaches' AthleticGift Shop
Award Plaques $19.95 each10% off on orders over $100
Desk Plates $24.95 each
25% off on orders over 10
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
* Based on the curriculum unit, Buyer Beware, Math Scape Seeing and Thinking Mathematically, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, 1998.
IDENTIFYING TEACHER SKILLS IN PRACTICE
Uni
t Pla
nG
rade
Sev
enIn
stru
ctio
nal T
hem
e T
he In
form
ed C
onsu
mer
*
Key
Sta
ndar
dsN
umbe
r Se
nse
1.0
Stud
ents
kno
w th
e pr
oper
ties
of, a
nd c
ompu
te w
ith, r
atio
nal n
umbe
rs e
xpre
ssed
in a
var
iety
of
form
s:1.
3C
onve
rt f
ract
ions
to d
ecim
als
and
perc
ents
and
use
thes
e re
pres
enta
tions
in e
stim
atio
ns, c
ompu
tatio
ns, a
nd a
pplic
atio
ns.
1.7
Solv
e pr
oble
ms
that
invo
lve
disc
ount
s, m
arku
ps, c
omm
issi
ons,
and
pro
fit,
and
com
pute
sim
ple
and
com
poun
d in
tere
st.
Mat
hem
atic
al R
easo
ning
2.0
Stud
ents
use
str
ateg
ies,
ski
lls, a
nd c
once
pts
in f
indi
ng s
olut
ions
:2.
1U
se e
stim
atio
n to
ver
ify
the
reas
onab
lene
ss o
f ca
lcul
ated
res
ults
.2.
2A
pply
str
ateg
ies
and
resu
lts f
rom
sim
pler
pro
blem
s to
mor
e co
mpl
ex p
robl
ems.
2.5
Use
a v
arie
ty o
f m
etho
ds, s
uch
as w
ords
, num
bers
, sym
bols
, cha
rts,
gra
phs,
tabl
es, d
iagr
ams,
and
mod
els,
to e
xpla
in m
athe
mat
ical
rea
soni
ng.
2.6
Exp
ress
the
solu
tion
clea
rly
and
logi
cally
by
usin
g th
e ap
prop
riat
e m
athe
mat
ical
not
atio
n an
d te
rms
and
clea
r la
ngua
ge;
supp
ort s
olut
ions
with
evi
denc
e in
bot
h ve
rbal
and
sym
bolic
wor
k.3.
0St
uden
ts d
eter
min
e a
solu
tion
is c
ompl
ete
and
mov
e be
yond
a p
artic
ular
pro
blem
by
gene
raliz
ing
to o
ther
sol
utio
ns:
3.2
Not
e th
e m
etho
d of
der
ivin
g th
e so
lutio
n an
d de
mon
stra
te a
con
cept
ual u
nder
stan
ding
of
the
deri
vatio
n by
sol
ving
sim
ilar
prob
lem
s.3.
3D
evel
op g
ener
aliz
atio
ns o
f th
e re
sults
obt
aine
d an
d th
e st
rate
gies
use
d an
d ap
ply
them
to n
ew p
robl
em s
ituat
ions
.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d ab
out u
nit p
rice
to ta
keon
the
role
of
inve
stig
ativ
e re
port
er to
res
earc
h cl
aim
s m
ade
bya
sand
wic
h ba
r ab
out t
he u
nit p
rice
s of
thei
r sa
ndw
iche
s.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d ab
out r
atio
and
prop
ortio
n to
pla
n fo
r an
inte
rnat
iona
l din
ner.
The
y se
t up
and
solv
e pr
opor
tions
usi
ng e
qual
rat
ios
or c
ross
pro
duct
s to
incr
ease
a d
inne
r re
cipe
, and
they
use
pro
port
ions
to d
ecid
e th
eco
sts
of a
ppet
izer
s fo
r th
e bu
ffet
.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d to
pla
n an
ath
letic
banq
uet.T
hey
are
give
n a
set a
mou
nt o
f m
oney
and
mus
t kee
pa
budg
et to
kee
p tr
ack
of m
onet
ary
expe
nditu
res.
The
y m
ake
deci
sion
s on
pla
nnin
g a
men
u, s
elec
ting
ente
rtai
nmen
t, an
dpu
rcha
sing
aw
ards
, dec
orat
ions
, and
gif
ts f
or th
e co
ache
s.T
hey
mus
t als
o di
spla
y th
eir
budg
et in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph.
SEC
TIO
N O
NE
: RA
TE
SSE
CT
ION
TW
O: R
AT
IOS
AN
D P
RO
POR
TIO
NS
SEC
TIO
N T
HR
EE
: PE
RC
EN
TS
Les
son
Con
tent
and
Ski
llsL
esso
n C
onte
nt a
nd S
kills
Les
son
Con
tent
and
Ski
llsC
alcu
late
the
unit
pric
e of
an
item
.Se
t up
ratio
s to
com
pare
item
s.U
se b
ench
mar
ks to
est
imat
e pe
rcen
ts.
Det
erm
ine
whi
ch p
acka
ge s
ize
is th
e be
tter
buy.
Use
rat
io ta
bles
to f
ind
equa
l rat
ios.
Est
imat
e pe
rcen
ts u
sing
men
tal m
ath.
Use
wei
ght u
nits
to c
ompa
re th
e pr
ice
of d
iffe
rent
item
s.W
rite
rat
ios
as s
impl
ifie
d fr
actio
ns.
Use
cou
ntin
g an
d ro
undi
ng to
est
imat
e pe
rcen
ts.
Com
pare
pri
ce p
er o
unce
to d
ecid
e th
e be
tter
buy.
Dec
ide
if tw
o ra
tios
are
equi
vale
nt.
Con
vert
am
ong
frac
tions
, dec
imal
s, a
nd p
erce
nts.
Vis
ualiz
e an
d ca
lcul
ate
unit
pric
es w
ith a
pri
ce g
raph
.U
se r
atio
s to
com
pare
dif
fere
nt p
rodu
cts.
Inte
rpre
t dat
a in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph.
Con
stru
ct a
pri
ce g
raph
fro
m a
list
of
prod
ucts
.U
se c
ross
pro
duct
s an
d eq
uiva
lent
fra
ctio
ns to
com
pare
rat
ios.
Con
stru
ct a
cir
cle
grap
h.U
se a
pri
ce g
raph
to c
heck
uni
t pri
ce c
alcu
latio
ns.
Use
equ
al r
atio
s to
sol
ve a
pro
port
ion.
Find
dis
coun
ts a
nd r
esul
ting
sale
pri
ces.
Use
a c
alcu
lato
r to
fin
d th
e pr
ice
per
poun
d.U
se c
ross
pro
duct
s to
sol
ve a
pro
port
ion.
Use
cal
cula
tors
to f
ind
sale
pri
ces.
Est
imat
e to
fin
d th
e be
tter
buy.
Dec
ide
if it
is e
asie
r to
use
cro
ss p
rodu
cts
or e
qual
rat
ios
CO
Cal
cula
te s
avin
gs in
a p
erce
nt-o
ff s
ale.
Com
pare
uni
t pri
ces
to f
ind
the
bette
r bu
y.so
lve
a pr
opor
tion.
Det
erm
ine
savi
ngs
with
dis
coun
t cou
pons
.So
lve
unit
pric
e pr
oble
ms
usin
g a
calc
ulat
or.
Set u
p an
d so
lve
a pr
opor
tion.
Plan
a b
udge
t.Fi
nd a
nd c
ompa
re u
nit p
rice
s.U
se c
ross
pro
duct
s an
d/or
equ
al r
atio
s to
sol
ve a
pro
port
ion.
Dis
play
a b
udge
t in
a ci
rcle
gra
ph.
Cal
cula
te lo
ng-t
erm
sav
ings
with
the
less
exp
ensi
ve p
rodu
ct.
Use
pro
port
ions
to in
crea
se a
rec
ipe.
Con
stru
ct a
cir
cle
grap
h.U
se p
ropo
rtio
ns to
dec
ide
cost
s.So
lve
prob
lem
s in
volv
ing
perc
ents
and
dis
coun
ts.
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
Dv rn Cl) 1 C)
CD 10 > < r ): oo 1 m
(S
ampl
e W
orks
heet
s/T
each
er C
omm
ents
*
Wor
kshe
et A
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Est
imat
e E
xpen
ses
Est
imat
ing
a pe
rcen
t of
som
ethi
ng is
muc
h th
e sa
me
as e
stim
atin
g a
frac
tiona
l par
t of
som
ethi
ng.
Las
t yea
r th
e C
ouga
rs f
ootb
all t
eam
's to
tal e
xpen
ses
wer
e $2
0,00
0. T
he ta
ble
belo
w s
how
s w
hat p
erce
nt o
f th
e bu
dget
was
spe
nt o
n ea
ch e
xpen
se. A
bout
how
muc
h m
oney
was
spe
nt o
n ea
ch it
em?
1.M
ake
a ta
ble
like
the
one
show
n be
low
and
com
plet
e th
e la
stco
lum
n. E
stim
ate
the
cost
of
each
exp
ense
. Use
ben
chm
arks
and
men
tal m
ath
to m
ake
your
est
imat
es. D
o no
t use
pap
er a
nd p
enci
l.
2.T
he te
am s
pent
exa
ctly
$80
0 on
one
exp
ense
. Whi
ch w
as it
? U
sees
timat
ion
to f
igur
e it
out.
3.T
he T
iger
s fo
otba
ll te
am, c
ross
-tow
n ri
vals
, spe
nt 2
6% o
f its
$16,
000
budg
et o
n un
ifor
ms.
Whi
ch te
am s
pent
mor
e on
unif
orm
s? U
se e
stim
atio
n to
fig
ure
it ou
t.
Foot
ball
Tea
m E
xpen
ses
Item
sPe
rcen
tof
Bud
get
Est
imat
edC
ost
Uni
form
s23
%
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
6%
Coa
ch's
Sal
ary
48%
Equ
ipm
ent
11%
Off
icia
ls' F
ees
4%
Tra
iner
's S
alar
y8%
Tot
al E
xpen
ses:
$20,
000
Wor
kshe
et B
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Cou
ntin
g an
d R
ound
ing
A g
irls
' fie
ld h
ocke
y te
am w
ants
to p
lay
in a
tour
nam
ent.
The
sch
ool d
istr
ict
will
pay
onl
y a
cert
ain
perc
enta
ge o
f ea
ch e
xpen
se. T
he te
am m
ust r
aise
the
amou
nt n
ot p
aid
by th
e di
stri
ct.
If y
ou c
an f
ind
50%
, 10%
, and
1%
of
a nu
mbe
r m
enta
lly, y
ou c
an a
lso
estim
ate
som
e ot
her
perc
ents
men
tally
. For
exa
mpl
e, th
ink
of 2
5% a
s ha
lf o
f50
% a
nd 5
% a
s ha
lf o
f 10
%.
Fiel
d H
ocke
y T
eam
Tri
p E
xpen
ses
Exp
ense
Est
imat
edC
ost
Perc
ent D
istr
ict
Will
Pay
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
$700
3%
Mea
ls$6
0012
%
Hot
el$9
254%
Tou
rnam
ent F
ees
$346
22%
Tou
rnam
ent U
nifo
rms
$473
2.5%
1.U
se c
ount
ing
and
roun
ding
to e
stim
ate
the
dolla
r am
ount
the
scho
oldi
stri
ct w
ill p
ay f
or e
ach
expe
nse.
2.E
stim
ate
the
tota
l am
ount
the
dist
rict
will
pay
for
all
the
expe
nses
.3.
Est
imat
e th
e to
tal a
mou
nt o
f m
oney
the
team
will
nee
d to
rai
se.
4.U
se y
our
calc
ulat
or to
fig
ure
out t
he e
xact
am
ount
the
team
will
nee
dto
rai
se f
or e
ach
expe
nse.
Wri
te A
bout
You
r E
stim
ates
Wri
te a
bout
the
estim
ates
you
mad
e fo
r th
e fi
eld
hock
ey te
am e
xpen
ses.
Wha
t str
ateg
ies
did
you
use
to e
stim
ate
the
expe
nses
and
tota
l cos
t?
Wha
t are
som
e w
ays
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er y
our
estim
ate
is r
easo
nabl
e?
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
Sam
ple
Wor
kshe
ets/
Tea
cher
Com
men
ts*
Stud
ent
Hom
ewor
k A
Peri
odD
ate
EST
IMA
TIN
G P
ER
CE
NT
S
App
lyin
g Sk
ills
The
fie
ld h
ocke
y te
am's
tota
l exp
ense
s fo
r la
st y
ear
wer
e $1
0,00
0. E
stim
ate
how
muc
h w
as s
pent
on
each
of
the
expe
nses
list
ed b
elow
. Use
ben
chm
arks
and
men
tal
mat
h to
mak
e yo
ur e
stim
ates
.
Item
Perc
ent
of B
udge
tE
stim
ated
Cos
t
1. U
nifo
rms
22%
2. T
rans
port
atio
n4%
3. C
oach
's S
alar
y12
%
4. E
quip
men
t49
%
5. O
ffic
ials
' Fee
s6%
6. T
rain
er's
Sal
ary
7%
Est
imat
e ea
ch n
umbe
r in
item
s 7-
10. T
hen
use
your
cal
cula
tor
to s
ee h
ow c
lose
you
res
timat
e is
.7.
49%
of
179
8. 2
4% o
f 31
99.
19%
of
354
10. 3
4% o
f 17
511
. Fin
d 7%
of
$400
. 7%
mea
nsfo
r ev
ery
12. F
ind
12%
of
$300
. 12%
mea
nsfo
r ev
ery
Ext
endi
ng C
once
pts
13. T
o es
timat
e 24
% o
f 43
, LeR
on s
ubst
itute
d nu
mbe
rs a
nd f
ound
25%
of
44. H
isan
swer
was
11.
Usi
ng h
is c
alcu
lato
r, h
e fo
und
that
the
exac
t ans
wer
is 1
0.32
. LeR
onco
nclu
ded
that
sub
stitu
ting
num
bers
cau
ses
you
to o
vere
stim
ate.
Do
you
agre
e? I
fno
t, gi
ve a
cou
nter
exam
ple.
14. N
irup
a ca
lls h
ome
from
col
lege
at l
east
onc
e a
wee
k. A
30-
min
ute
phon
e ca
ll co
sts
$10
on w
eekd
ays.
Nir
upa
can
save
20%
if s
he c
alls
on
a w
eeke
nd. H
ow m
uch
mon
eydo
es s
he s
ave
on a
30-
min
ute
call
mad
e on
Sat
urda
y?
Mak
ing
Con
nect
ions
15. L
ook
thro
ugh
new
spap
ers
and
mag
azin
es to
fin
d ar
ticle
s in
volv
ing
perc
ents
.D
esig
n a
colla
ge w
ith th
e ar
ticle
s. W
rite
out
per
cent
s fr
om 1
thro
ugh
100
and
thei
req
uiva
lent
fra
ctio
nal b
ench
mar
ks.
Tea
cher
Com
men
ts
The
Inf
orm
ed C
onsu
mer
: Per
cent
Uni
t
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Doe
s th
is w
ork
dem
onst
rate
:
Cor
rect
use
of
frac
tiona
l ben
chm
arks
and
cou
ntin
g an
d ro
undi
ng to
estim
ate
perc
ents
?
Acc
urat
e an
alys
is o
f da
ta r
epre
sent
ed in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph?
Cor
rect
cal
cula
tion
of s
avin
gs in
a p
erce
nt-o
ff s
ale?
Eff
ectiv
e us
e of
a b
udge
t to
plan
exp
endi
ture
s?
Prec
ise
cons
truc
tion
of a
cir
cle
grap
h to
rep
rese
nt p
erce
nts?
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
CHAPTER THREE
he Work of Instructional LeadershipSupporting Teachers to Build and SustainCritical Skills
TANDARDS, ULTIMATELY, ARE AN EXPRESSION OF A
school's or a district's values. Student standards reflect what the organiza-tion believes students can and should learn and do. Performance standards forteaching reflect what teachers are expected to do, and how well, in order toensure student success. Typically, schools think of standards as lists of desired
knowledge or skills, embodied for students in content standards and assessments,and for teachers in the criteria and processes used for teacher evaluation. But,irrespective of what might be printed in any documents, the real standards in aschool or district are evident in the quality of work expected and/or tolerated ofstudents and of teachers in their day-to-day work. Instructional leadership entailsengaging the school community in processes of identifying and examining thesede facto standards, raising hard questions about their rigor and efficacy, and, ifneed be, negotiating new, more appropriate expectations. By doing so, leaderscreate opportunities for teachers to learn and build their capacity to provideeffective instruction to all students.
To build and sustain the skills necessary for effective standards-based instruc-tion, teachers need opportunities to internalize the standards for student perfor-mance and to get feedback on whether their own instructional skills and prac-
5?_5_1
THE WORK OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
tices are calibrated to the expectations for teacher performance. In particular, inorder to build the skills defined in Chapter One (page 18), teachers need practice:
identifying exemplars of student work that meet the performance standardsfor their students;
identifying the types of assignments and learning experiences that provide
students appropriate intellectual challenge in relation to the standard(s);
identifying and naming the quality criteria for adequate performance on agiven task;
creating or selecting high-quality classroom assessments;
making reliable judgments of student work in relation to the school's sharedperformance standards;
accurately analyzing student strengths and weaknesses as revealed in theirwork; and
identifying effective strategies for circling back to those students who needadditional assistance.
Traditional professional development hit-and-run workshops will notsuffice. If the skills required for effective instruction are to become sharedorganizational expectations, leaders must foster ongoing opportunities for thecollaboration, practice, and feedback that teachers need in order to arrive atcommon understandings of what they should expect of students and of them-selves. This requires that leaders create new structures that facilitate and newexpectations that require teachers to come together to examine expectationsand share expertise. But even as they do that, they must learn to more effectivelyuse time that has already been allocated for staff interactions around instruction.
Structures for Teacher Collaboration and Learning
One way instructional leaders can help staff develop and understand sharedstandards for student performance is by facilitating group analysis of studentwork. When structured as examinations of cross-classroom student worksamples, these conversations can help teachers negotiate shared performance
standards; internalize the qualities of high-quality work; and look for perfor-mance patterns that may point to strengths or areas of concern in the instruc-tional program. In this collaborative effort, they begin to identify, understand,and embrace higher expectations for both teaching and learning.
52_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 58
Teachers convene around a set of sample student papers to ask questions, such
as: Which of these papers should we consider good enough (at or above standard) for
students at this level? What are the specific characteristics we see in work that is good
enough? What is missing in work that is not yet to standard? Taking into consideration
the entire sample, what do these papers tell us about patterns of pelformance among
our students? What specific skills are they good at? With which ones are they having
trouble? Critical to the success of these dialogues is a leader who has deep knowl-
edge of the content represented in the work being discussed or an adequate
number of participants who have that knowledge and who are willing to questionand challenge their colleagues about the quality of the work under consideration.
Under skilled leadership, collaborative analysis of student work progresses
from sorting and analyzing patterns in the work to examining "next-step" ques-tions, such as: What can we do about those patterns that worry us? What went on in
the classrooms of teachers whose student work met or exceeded the standard? How can
we share expertise or resources to ensure that all students get those learning experiences?
In collaborating on answers to these questions, teachers deepen their understand-ing of the relationship between their instructional practices and the quality of thework that students produce. Research suggests that collective reviews of studentwork play a key role in enabling schools to break the too familiar pattern of lowacademic performance in high-poverty communities (Reeves, 1997; EducationTrust, 1998).
Another promising new collaborative structure through which teachers focus
on key issues of instruction is Lesson Study. Patterned on the practices of teach-
ers in Japan, and brought to the attention of teachers in the United Statesthrough the work of James Stigler in his book, The Teaching Gap (Stigler &Hiebert, 1999), Lesson Study convenes groups of teachers to plan lessons,observe each other teach, and then share feedback on what worked and how a
lesson might be revised.
Both collaborative analysis of student work and Lesson Study require leaders
to ensure that teachers have adequate time to interact in new ways. While these
collaborations provide valuable opportunities for teachers to learn together, they
are not the only means of fostering the instructional skills necessary to teach
effectively to standards. Administrators and teacher leaders should also look to
existing structures within induction programs and the teacher supervision-and-evaluation process as opportunities to stretch teachers' thinking about what getstaught, how it is taught, and how it should be evaluated. The one-on-one plan-ning-and-reflection conferences usually required as part of these processes provideknowledgeable instructional leaders opportunities to model, teach, and give
feedback on essential aspects of standards-based instruction.
59 THE WORK OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
LOOKING AT STUDENT WORK:RESOURCES FORINSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS
The following resources may be useful to instructional
leaders learning to facilitate analysis of student work in
relation to standards:
Collaborating for High Standards: AnalyzingStudent Work
Produced by the Western Assessment Collaborative at
West Ed (2002), this video captures a faculty group
using student work to establish performance standards,
plan reteaching, and identify student performance
patterns that will guide their programmatic planning.
Supplemental materials provide student work samples
used in the video, along with protocols instructional
leaders can use to guide their own faculty through
similar analysis.
Standards in Practice
Sponsored by the Education Trust, this project provides
professional development to teacher groups, helping
them look at student work and assess whether their
assignments are rigorously aligned with standards; what
instruction their students need to reach standards; and
how to change their practice so that all students are
successful. More information about the project is
available at www.edtrust.org.
Exemplars
Exemplars is an online resource that provides
classroom-tested, standards-based assessment and
instructional materials tied to national standards.
Classroom activities include rubrics and annotated
benchmark papers. The project also offers professional
development support and products covering
Mathematics, Science, and Reading/Writing/Research.
More information is available at
www.exemplars.com.
Web Sites of Interest:Looking At Student Work: A project of the Annenberg
Institute for School Reform www.lasw.org
Coalition of Essential Schools
www.essentialschools.org.
Guiding Instructional Planningand Reflection
Included in the Appendix of this publication areseveral tools that can be used by individualteachers or groups of teachers who are involved incollaborative lesson development, as well as by
administrators or teacher leaders as they mentor,coach or supervise individual teachers. Each tool isbriefly described below and is included in itsentirety in the Appendix.
The first tool, "Teacher's Instructional
Lesson/Unit Planning Guide," walks a teacher or agroup of teachers through the instructionalplanning process and provides a list of questionsto be considered at each step. The questions aredesigned to cause teachers, first, to clearly articu-late their expectations for student performance interms of what students will do, then, to definehow achievement of those expectations will beassessed, and to anticipate common misunder-standings that may impede student learning. Aftercarefully considering these key issues, the teacheris then guided to develop lessons that will addresscommon misunderstandings and provide studentsopportunities to learn and practice each of theskills required in a successful performance.
The sequence of key questions in the planningprocess consists of:
1. What do you want students to know and beable to do as the result ofthis lesson/unit?
2. What will students need to do todemonstrate that they know these
things? What specific characteristics do you
expect to see in that work?
3. How do you know these expectations areappropriate?
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT
BEST COPY AVAILABI. r
60
4. How do these expectations fit into longer range expectations for student
learning?
5. How do you need to prepare yourself to teach this lesson/unit?
6. What misconceptions do you anticipate that students will bring to this
lesson/unit and how will you address these?
7. What lessons will you plan in order to ensure that every student has
access to the requisite knowledge and chances for guided and independent
practice and feedback on the skills required to succeed?
8. What instructional materials do you have or need to ensure that all
students have access to the content?
Each question in the planning guide is followed by a set of more-detailedprompts that teachers should consider in preparing a response to the mainquestion. The guide also provides space for writing planning notes. An excerptfrom the guide Question 1 and its prompts is included below. This toolcan be used simply to guide teachers' thinking, or it can be adapted as a lesson/unit planning form that a teacher might submit to a coach or evaluator inadvance of a classroom visitation or reflective interview.
Excerpt from Teacher's Instructional Lesson/Unit Planning Guide
Key Question Teacher notes:
1. What standard(s) are you addressing in this lesson/unit?What do you want students to know and be able to doas the result of this lesson/unit?
A. How large a "chunk" of instruction do you want totake on in this lesson/unit? Do you want to cover onenarrow standard, a standard and all of its relatedelements, or several standards at once?
B. Have you considered not only the topic of thestandard, but what students will actually be expectedto do to demonstrate achievement of this standard?
C. What level of "understanding" is required by thestandard? Will it be enough for students simply torecall information, or will they be expected to showdeeper understanding by using higher level skills?
The second tool, the "Lesson/Unit Planning Conference Interview Proto-col," is organized by a similar set of key questions, but is designed for use byinstructional leaders to guide teachers through the instructional planning process
_5_5THE WORK OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
Ui
and/or as a diagnostic assessment of the teacher's lesson planning skills. Next toeach of the questions in the planning sequence is a list of the knowledge and/orskills the coach or evaluator would listen for in the teacher's response. An excerptfrom the Interview Protocol follows.
Excerpt from Lesson/Unit Planning Conference Interview Protocol
Interviewer's Question Listen for whether the teacher knows and/or doesthese things:
How do you plan to assess Uses tasks/questions that are fair and actually assessstudent learning in this lesson? what they are meant to assessDescribe the task(s) and thecriteria you will use.
Assures that data will be available for each student
Plans to conduct both formative and summativeassessments
Gathers evidence of student learning efficiently andeffectively
Understands the quality of the evidence the assessmentwill provide and whether more or different evidencewill be needed
Articulates criteria for success in terms of specificcharacteristics of the work, not just its length, itsappearance, or the student's level of effort
Establishes performance grading criteria that areappropriately benchmarked to district standards
Focusing on lesson/unit planning gives instructional leaders a unique oppor-tunity to both foster and assess the skills of targeted, standards-based instruction.
Some leaders have found the planning conference more valuable than the typical"pre- observation conference," which generally focuses on a lesson the teacher hasalready planned. The questions in the conference protocol are sequenced in such away that the leader models effective instructional planning: he or she asks firstabout the standards for successful student performance and how they will beassessed, and only then about the lessons that are planned to ensure that studentsachieve the standards. The planning conference yields critical information about a
teacher's expectations for student achievement, how those expectations are likelyto play out in practice, and how the teacher intends to judge student work.Equally important, the conference yields this information before the teacherintroduces students to activities that might not align to appropriate standards.
The third tool, "Framework for Guiding Lesson/Unit Reflections," is a
menu of questions instructional leaders can use in helping teachers reflect on theeffectiveness of a lesson/unit they recently taught and on the factors that
5_6_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 62
contributed to or inhibited its success. Post-lesson reflective interviews areanother opportunity both to foster and to assess the skills teachers need foreffective standards-based instruction. The framework provides a variety ofquestions that might be explored in a post-lesson conference and indicates theteaching skills that the interviewer would be looking for in the teacher's response.An excerpt from this tool follows.
Excerpt from Framework for Guiding Lesson/Unit Reflections
Reflective questions to be framed byinterviewer:
What might we hope to hear in theteacher's response?
Related to the teacher's skills in analyzing The teacher offers evidence of student
results: learning from student work.
1. Given the work the students produced, was The teacher does a careful analysis of studentyour lesson/unit successful? work and uses this information to assess:
2. Given the evidence from student work, what his or her assumptions about what iswill you need to reteach? How will yourinstruction differ when you reteach thisskill(s)?
needed or still needs to be taught;
_ the effectiveness of his or her ownteaching;
3. Did your analysis of student work indicatethat you were right about what skills you the specific concepts or skills that may
needed to teach in order to prepare students need to be retaught and to which
for the assessment you gave? students; and
4. Where are you going next with students who whether to proceed according to his or
did well on this assessment? Why? her long-range course plans or to adjustthese in some way to better meetstudents' needs.
Related to the teacher's content knowledge: The teacher has chosen a reasonable slice of
1. How did you decide whether to teach/ instruction based on an understanding of the
assess all of the sub-skills included in the content and of students' needs. When
standard(s) or to focus on a narrower set? narrow skills were selected, the teacher isable to put them in context and relate them
2. How, if at all, did you need to prepare to larger, more complex skills or concepts toyourself to teach the content described in be learned later. If the lesson/unit addressedthis standard(s)? several related standards, the teacher can
3. What prior knowledge did your students describe how they fit together and the
have that convinced you that this was rationale for sequencing them in this
appropriate standard(s) to teach to at thistime?
particular way.
The teacher's knowledge of the content4. How did you draw on that prior allows him or her to make connections
knowledge in planning or conducting your between the planned lesson and priorlesson? knowledge in this discipline and to related
5. What connections did you make for your concepts in other disciplines.
students between the knowledge or skills When the teacher is unsure of key conceptsrequired by this standard and other or skills to be addressed in the lesson, he orconcepts within this content area or in she seeks deeper understanding inother content areas? preparation for the lesson.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
THE WORK OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
The questions in this framework define the success of a lesson in terms ofthe quality of what students are able to do or produce as a result of it. Modelingthe characteristics of effective standards-based instruction, conference plannersshould sequence this conference by first asking the teacher to reflect on thelesson's effectiveness as evidenced by the quality of the work students produced.Typically, post-observation conferences held as part of the teacher supervision-and-evaluation process begin with the interviewer asking some form of thequestion, "So, how do you think the lesson went?" Using this framework, theinterviewer begins, instead, with a question that models the definition of effec-tive teaching: "Given the work that the students produced, what evidence doyou have about the effectiveness of this lesson?" The teacher would then be askedto consider some of the other questions in relation to that initial analysis.
The framework is designed for use when planning or conducting a reflectivelesson study dialogue or when conducting a conference with an individualteacher at the conclusion of a lesson/unit. A fruitful, although limited, interviewcan be conducted even when the interviewer has not had the opportunity toobserve the teacher conducting the lesson/unit. Student work and other artifactsof instruction provide many clues to the effectiveness of the teacher's skills. Theframework includes many more questions than can reasonably be explored inone conference. In choosing which questions to use to focus the conference, theinterviewer will want to consider either the specific skills an individual teacherneeds to work on or those skills that have been identified as necessary forschoolwide instructional improvement.
All three of these tools are designed for use by instructional leaders to focusinstructional planning and professional reflections on the relationship betweenteacher actions and student learning. Each suggests that the effectiveness ofinstruction can be ascertained not by what teachers do, but by what studentsunderstand and can do as the result of what the teacher does. They emphasizethe need for teachers to be clear about what is expected of students and to targettheir teaching accordingly. Used regularly to focus conversations among teachersand between teachers and administrators, these tools help raise issues critical tothe quality of teaching and learning in the school and serve as catalysts toteachers' professional growth.
5_8_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT: 64
CHAPTER FOUR
cfeaders as TeachersLeaders as Learners
....qS INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS DEVELOP AN UNDERSTANDINGof the teaching skills required for effective standards-based instruction
and begin to foster their use among teachers, they are likely to learn somethingabout what they, too, need to learn. It is likely they will discover the need tobecome more familiar with appropriate expectations for student performanceand with the kinds of instructional strategies necessary to ensure that all stu-
dents will meet them.
It is not enough that instructional leaders ask good questions about theappropriateness of standards and the alignment and efficacy of instruction.The real leadership challenge comes in learning to recognize appropriateanswers and learning to respond in productive ways to those answers that raise
concerns. School leaders must find ways to confront the low expectations thatmay be revealed in conversations with and among teachers, and they must have
a ready repertoire of tools and strategies to offer to teachers whose own work
may need improvement.
It almost goes without saying that instructional leaders, themselves, needpreparation and-support in order to contribute to teacher learning. For example,leaders will need to be prepared with a set of criteria upon which they can judgethe alignment and rigor of classroom assessments, as well as with models of
65 LEADERS AS TEACHERS
classroom assessments that can be used to illustrate key issues and help teachersbetter design or select their own. They will need the ability to analyze studentwork themselves in order to detect when the teacher's lesson or unit has notadequately addressed the skills required of students, and they need to haveexemplars of student work that illustrate what students can be expected to dowhen prepared well. They must have the ability to facilitate groups of teachers touse collaborative time productively. Above all, they will need the mettle toconfront unproductive practice.
Districts committed to the achievement of high standards by all students willneed to invest in building the knowledge and skills of their leaders, and cannotexpect that the occasional workshop or professional conference will be sufficient.Administrators and teacher leaders must have regular opportunities to workcollaboratively with others to strengthen their instructional leadership skills.
Most likely, as leaders work with others to foster improved instruction, theywill uncover missing elements or the need for revision of the district-level systemof policies and practices that support high-quality, standards-based instruction.For example, in several of the districts with which WAC works, exercises making
use of the classroom vignettes in this book have led to dissatisfaction with thedistrict's standards for teacher performance. Leaders in these districts concludedthat the adopted standards for teacher performance do not adequately emphasizeassessment skills or the teacher's responsibility for instructional planning inrelation to shared performance standards.
Use of the planning-and-reflection conference frameworks are likely togenerate awareness of:
an absence of shared performance standards for students and the lack ofopportunity for teachers to negotiate shared understanding of what shouldbe considered "good enough" at a given grade level;
a lack of resources for conducting high-quality classroom assessments of
district or state standards; and
a mismatch between how teachers and administrators currently use their
time and how it needs to be spent to effectively plan, implement, andsupport high-quality instruction.
The potential of these discoveries argues for, not against, the use of theprofessional development tools included in this book. Used well, they willfunction as a catalyst for taking up these issues. In the districts with which WACworks, the discussions prompted by these tools have sometimes led to the
6_0_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 66
development of common grade-level classroom assessments and performancestandards; revisions in the procedures used to evaluate teachers and supportteacher learning; or the development of standards for administrators.
Perhaps most importantly, in coming to better understand the skills requiredfor effective standards-based instruction, leaders in WAC partner districts arerethinking what it means to commit to the achievement of high standards by allstudents, and what it means to be an instructional leader. They are beginning totake up the challenge of providing for the ongoing, job-embedded professionaldevelopment that both administrators and teachers need if all students are toachieve to high standards. They are learning to focus that professional develop-ment on the critical issues of what students are learning, how it is evaluated, andwhat effective instruction entails. Moreover, they are breaking down the wallsbetween classrooms that have kept teachers isolated and unable to learn fromand with each other in ways that can result in improved student performance.
6 7111
LEADERS AS TEACHERS
esources
Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Scheiffelin Powell, B. (1999). Looking together at student work:
A companion guide to assessing student learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. C. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional
practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Education Trust. (1998). Education watch: 1998 state and national data book(Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Education Trust.
Elmore, R. F (2000, Winter). Building a new structure for school leadership. (Avail-
able from The Albert Shanker Institute, 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington,DC, 20208.)
Elmore, R. F, with the assistance of Burney, D. (1996, March). Staff development
and instructional improvement in Community School District #2. Philadelphia:
Consortium for Policy and Research in Education and National Commission onTeaching & America's Future.
Elmore, R. F, & Burney, D. (1998). Continuous improvement in Community District
#2, New York City. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and
Development Center, High Performance Learning Community Projects.
Fink, E., & Resnick, L. B. (2001). Developing principals as instructional leaders.
Phi Delta Kappan, 82 (8), 598-606.
62_ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 63
Jamentz, K. (1998). Standards: From document to dialogue. San Francisco: West Ed.
Jamentz, K. (2001). Teaching to quality: The instructional demands of standards-based
reform. (Item No. 39-0186). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
Maloy, K. (1998, May). Building a learning community: The story of New York City
Community School District #2. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, High
Performance Learning Communities Project at the Learning Research and Develop-
ment Center.
McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1988). Why staying one chapter
ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. East Lansing, MI: National
Center for Research on Teacher Education.
Murnane, R. J., & Levy, E (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles educating
children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: The Free Press.
Platt, A. D., Tripp, C. E., Ogden, W. R., & Fraser, R. G. (2000). The skillful leader:
Confronting mediocre teaching. Acton, MA: Ready About Press.
Reeves, D. B. (2000). Accountability in action: A blueprint for learning organizations.
Denver, CO: Advanced Learning Centers.
Reeves, D. B. (1997). Making standards work: How to implement standards-based
assessments in the classroom, school, and district. Denver, CO: Advanced Learning
Centers.
Spillane, J. P. (2000, February). District leaders' perceptions of teacher learning.
(CPRE Occasional Paper Series, OP-05). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania,
Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
SRI International. (2001, August). When theory hits reality: Standards-based reform in
urban districts. (SRI Project P07270). Philadelphia: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Macmillan
College Publishing Company, Inc.
Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers' hands: Investigating the practices
of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's
teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Simon & Schuster Trade.
Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are
failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon
& Schuster.
Tichey, N. M. (1997). The leadership engine: How winning companies build leaders at
every level. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
6._63
RESOURCES
APPENDIX
ools for Fostering and AssessingInstructional Skills
Each of the professional development tools referenced in previous chapters isincluded here in its entirety. Readers are invited to copy and use these tools as wehave formatted them or to request online versions that they can customize foruse in their own district or school. Requests for online versions should bedirected to the Western Assessment Collaborative at West Ed (email: [email protected]). Brief descriptions of each tool with suggestions for use arepresented below:
Teacher's Instructional Lesson/Unit Planning Guide designed for useby individual or groups of teachers in planning lessons or units ofinstruction. The left-hand column takes the teacher through criticalplanning steps. There is space for notes in the right-hand column. Theguide could be modified for use as a lesson/unit planning form that wouldbe prepared by a teacher and submitted to a coach or supervisor for review.
Lesson/Unit Planning Conference Interview Protocol designed for useby an administrator or teacher leader in planning and conducting a lesson/unit planning conference with a teacher. The protocol takes the teacherthrough critical steps in planning a short lesson or a unit of instruction thatcontinues over several days. The right-hand column details the knowledgeand skills that the interviewer might hope to see evident in the teacher'sresponse to each question. Teachers might be encouraged to use the
"Teacher's Instructional Lesson/Unit Planning Guide" before theconference.
Framework for Guiding Lesson/Unit Reflections designed for use by aninstructional leader in conducting a conference with a teacher after
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT 7 0
completion of a lesson or unit; or by groups of teachers involved in lesson
study. The document provides a menu of questions from which the
interviewer can select to guide the conversation. The right-hand columnprovides the interviewer with indicators of what to look for in the teacher's
response. The indicators are intended to help the leader assess teacher skills
and make recommendations for improvement.
Ben Fryer: Teaching Third Graders to Write a Report of Information
Meg Tipple: Teaching Seventh Graders to Use Percentages
The vignettes in Chapter Two were annotated, with teacher skills identifiedin the right-hand column. Included in this Appendix are unannotatedversions, designed to use with administrators and/or teachers in helping
them identify some of the teacher skills essential to standards-based
instructional practice and to help them "see" these skills in action. Activities
designed to use the vignettes in this fashion are detailed below.
A. Provide each member of the group with a copy of the vignette (the version
in this section, with the right-hand column left blank) that relates most
closely to the grade level or subject they teach or support.
B. Have participants read the vignette once through without interruption.
C. Pair participants and ask them to identify the skills that the teacher in the
vignette is using to ensure that all students achieve the student performancestandards addressed in the unit. Have them name the skill as specifically as
possible and write it in the right-hand column near the point in thenarrative where it occurs.
D. Have two or more pairs meet to compare their responses. If your districthas adopted a set of teaching standards on which your teacher evaluationsystem is based, you might ask the groups at this point to share their
thoughts about the strengths and weaknesses of the teaching demonstratedin the vignette in relation to these specific standards. What evidence do
they have that the teacher has the required knowledge and skills? What
more might they want to know or find out in a conference with the teacher
or from future lessons?
E. A version of each vignette with the right-hand column already filled in isincluded in Chapter Two. This version can be used to help participants
check their initial responses and to see things they might not have noticed.
F. The version in Chapter Two can also be used to help participants betterunderstand the indicators of effective standards-based instruction detailed
on pages 18-19. This can be done by asking them to sort the responses in
716_5
APPENDIX
the right-hand column under each of the questions below. In what ways
does the teacher in this vignette:
Show that he or she understands the school's expectations for studentperformance?
Communicate standards for student performance to parents andstudents and help students assess their own progress in relation tothese?
Show that he or she knows how to align instruction to standards?
Show that he or she collects accurate data on student performance?
Uses data to guide instruction?
G. As an extension of the activities described above, participants can be askedto suggest ways that the lessons in the vignette could be strengthened.
ISOLATION IS THE ENEMY OF IMPROVEMENT7 4
TE
AC
HE
R'S
INS
TR
UC
TIO
NA
L LE
SS
ON
/UN
IT P
LAN
NIN
G G
UID
E
As
you
plan
you
r le
sson
/uni
t, co
nsid
er th
e ke
y qu
estio
ns b
elow
. For
eac
hke
y qu
estio
n, th
ere
is a
set
of a
dditi
onal
con
side
ratio
ns th
at m
ay o
rm
ay n
ot a
pply
to y
our
plan
ning
.
Mak
e no
tes
in th
e sp
ace
prov
ided
and
/or
atta
ch a
rtifa
cts
of y
our
less
on/
unit
to il
lust
rate
you
r pl
ans.
I. W
hat s
tand
ard(
s) a
re y
ou a
ddre
ssin
g in
this
less
on /u
nit?
Wha
t do
you
wan
t stu
dent
s to
kno
w a
nd b
e ab
le to
do
as th
e re
sult
of th
is le
sson
/uni
t?
A. H
ow la
rge
a "c
hunk
" of
inst
ruct
ion
do y
ou w
ant t
o ta
ke o
n in
this
less
on/u
nit?
Do
you
wan
t to
cove
r on
e na
rrow
sta
ndar
d, a
sta
ndar
d an
d al
l of i
ts r
elat
ed
elem
ents
, or
seve
ral s
tand
ards
?
B..
Hav
e yo
u co
nsid
ered
not
onl
y th
e to
pic
of th
e st
anda
rd, b
ut w
hat s
tude
nts
will
be e
xpec
ted
to d
o to
dem
onst
rate
ach
ieve
men
t of t
his
stan
dard
?C
. Wha
t lev
el o
f "un
ders
tand
ing"
is r
equi
red
by th
e st
anda
rd?
Will
it b
e en
ough
for
stud
ents
to s
impl
y re
call
info
rmat
ion,
or
shou
ld th
ey b
e ex
pect
ed to
sho
wde
eper
und
erst
andi
ng b
y us
ing
high
er le
vel s
kills
?
2. H
ow d
o yo
u pl
an to
ass
ess
whe
ther
stu
dent
s ha
ve le
arne
d th
ose
thin
gs?
Des
crib
e th
e ta
sk(s
) an
d th
e cr
iteria
you
will
use
, or
atta
ch
A. H
ow w
ill y
ou g
athe
r fo
rmat
ive
data
that
tell
you
wha
t stu
dent
s do
and
do
not u
nder
stan
d so
that
you
kno
w w
hat t
o re
teac
h an
d w
hen
stud
ents
are
read
y to
dem
onst
rate
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d in
a s
umm
ativ
e as
sess
men
t?
asse
ssm
ents
and
sco
ring
guid
es to
this
she
et.
B. H
ow w
ill y
ou s
truc
ture
the
sum
mat
ive
asse
ssm
ent t
o ge
t inf
orm
atio
n ab
out
ever
y st
uden
t?C
. Alth
ough
no
one
asse
ssm
ent t
ask
will
mee
t all
the
crite
ria li
sted
bel
ow,
cons
ider
how
you
will
add
ress
eac
h cr
iterio
n an
d w
hat o
ther
dat
a yo
u m
ay
need
to e
nsur
e th
at e
ach
stud
ent h
as a
chie
ved
the
stan
dard
(s)
in q
uest
ion.
The
asse
ssm
ent:
mirr
ors
real
-wor
ld u
se o
f req
uire
d kn
owle
dge
and
skill
s;ga
ther
s da
ta e
ffici
ently
and
effe
ctiv
ely;
prov
ides
stu
dent
s fe
edba
ck o
n sp
ecifi
c cr
iteria
; and
is w
ell-a
ligne
d to
all
dim
ensi
ons
of th
e st
anda
rd.
D. W
hat c
riter
ia w
ill y
ou u
se to
judg
e st
uden
t ach
ieve
men
t on
this
ass
essm
ent?
E. H
ow d
o yo
u kn
ow th
ese
are
alig
ned
to d
istr
ict/s
choo
l sta
ndar
ds?
F.
Is th
e st
anda
rd y
ou're
ass
essi
ng a
ddre
ssed
on
larg
e-sc
ale
asse
ssm
ents
that
you
r
stud
ents
will
take
? H
ow w
ill y
ou b
e su
re th
at s
tude
nts
are
fam
iliar
with
that
othe
r fo
rmat
for
asse
ssin
g th
ese
skill
s?
© 2
002
Wes
tEcr
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
tEd
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
e a tW
estE
d
TE
AC
HE
R'S
INS
TR
UC
TIO
NA
L LE
SS
ON
/UN
IT P
LAN
NIN
G G
UID
E
3. Is
this
sta
ndar
d(s)
app
ropr
iate
for
the
stud
ents
with
who
m y
ou w
illbe
wor
king
?
A. W
hat a
re s
tude
nts
at th
is g
rade
leve
l exp
ecte
d to
kno
w a
nd b
e ab
le to
do?
B. H
ow d
oes
your
pla
n re
late
to s
tate
or
dist
rict c
onte
nt a
nd p
erfo
rman
ce
stan
dard
s?
C. W
hat d
o st
uden
ts a
lread
y kn
ow th
at m
akes
them
rea
dy fo
r th
is le
sson
/uni
t?D
. How
will
you
mak
e co
nnec
tions
to th
is p
rior
know
ledg
e fo
r yo
ur s
tude
nts?
E. D
o al
l stu
dent
s ha
ve p
rere
quis
ite k
now
ledg
e an
d sk
ills?
F.
Is th
is le
sson
/uni
t app
ropr
iate
for
all s
tude
nts
at th
is ti
me?
G. I
f not
, wha
t pla
ns d
o yo
u ha
ve to
pre
pare
thos
e st
uden
ts fo
r w
hom
this
is n
ot
an a
ppro
pria
te le
sson
/uni
t at t
his
time?
4. If
this
is a
less
on p
lan,
how
will
this
less
on r
elat
e to
long
er-t
erm
goa
ls fo
rst
uden
t per
form
ance
?
A. H
ow d
oes
this
less
on fi
t int
o lo
nger
ran
ge g
oals
for
stud
ent l
earn
ing?
Is it
par
t
of a
larg
er u
nit?
B. H
ow is
it p
rere
quis
ite to
oth
er k
now
ledg
e an
d sk
ills?
C. H
ow d
oes
it fo
llow
from
pre
viou
s le
arni
ng?
D. H
ow w
ill it
con
trib
ute
to a
sses
smen
ts s
tude
nts
will
be
requ
ired
to d
o in
the
futu
re?
Des
crib
e or
atta
ch a
less
on/u
nit p
lan
to th
is p
lann
ing
guid
e.
5. H
ow c
omfo
rtab
le d
o yo
u fe
el w
ith th
e co
nten
t inv
olve
d in
this
less
on/
unit?
Wha
t, if
anyt
hing
, will
you
nee
d to
do
to p
repa
re y
ours
elf t
o te
ach
this
less
on?
A. A
re th
ere
aspe
cts
of th
e co
nten
t of t
his
less
on/u
nit w
ith w
hich
you
are
less
conf
iden
t or
unsu
re?
B. W
hat s
trat
egie
s m
ight
you
use
to b
e su
re y
ou u
nder
stan
d th
e co
nten
t wel
l
enou
gh to
teac
h an
d as
sess
this
sta
ndar
d?
6. W
hat a
re th
e co
mm
on m
isco
ncep
tions
stu
dent
s ha
ve w
hen
deal
ing
with
this
con
tent
?
A. W
hat s
tude
nt m
isun
ders
tand
ings
or
mis
conc
eptio
ns d
o yo
u an
ticip
ate
inre
latio
n to
this
sta
ndar
d or
you
r as
sess
men
t?B
. How
will
you
pla
n to
add
ress
thes
e w
ithin
the
less
on/u
nit?
© 2
002W
estE
cP A
ll rig
hts
Res
erve
d. P
erm
issi
on to
rep
rodu
ce w
ith W
estE
d co
pyrig
ht n
otic
e is
her
eby
gran
ted.
Wes
tern
Ass
essm
ent C
olla
bora
tiveat
Wes
tEd
TE
AC
HE
R'S
INS
TR
UC
TIO
NA
L LE
SS
ON
/UN
IT P
LAN
NIN
G G
UID
E
7. W
hat l
earn
ing
oppo
rtun
ities
hav
e yo
u pl
anne
d to
ens
ure
that
eve
ryD
escr
ibe
or a
ttach
less
on p
lan(
s) a
nd s
tude
nt a
ssig
nmen
ts to
this
stud
ent w
ill b
e pr
epar
ed to
dem
onst
rate
ach
ieve
men
t of t
he s
tand
ard(
s)?
plan
ning
gui
de.
Wha
t will
you
do
to e
nsur
e th
at th
ey h
ave
adeq
uate
info
rmat
ion,
as
wel
l as
oppo
rtun
ities
for
both
gui
ded
and
inde
pend
ent p
ract
ice?
Wha
t will
the
stud
ents
do?
How
do
thes
e pl
ans
refle
ct w
hat y
ou k
now
abo
ut th
e va
rious
stud
ents
in th
is c
lass
or
grou
p?
A. W
hat l
esso
ns w
ill y
ou d
evel
op to
ens
ure
that
all
stud
ents
are
pre
pare
d to
dem
onst
rate
all
of th
e qu
ality
crit
eria
est
ablis
hed
for
your
ass
essm
ent?
B. H
ow w
ill y
ou d
iffer
entia
te le
sson
s to
mee
t the
nee
ds o
f ind
ivid
ual l
earn
ers
in
your
gro
up?
C. H
ave
you
plan
ned
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
guid
ed p
ract
ice
of n
ew s
kills
bef
ore
requ
iring
stu
dent
s to
wor
k on
thei
r ow
n?
8. W
hat i
nstr
uctio
nal m
ater
ials
do
you
plan
to u
se?
How
mig
ht th
ese
need
to b
e m
odifi
ed to
ens
ure
stud
ent l
earn
ing?
A. W
hat t
ext o
r m
ultim
edia
mat
eria
ls w
ill y
ou d
raw
upo
n fo
r th
is le
sson
?B
. How
do
they
alig
n w
ith th
e st
anda
rd?
C.
In w
hat w
ays
mig
ht th
ey n
eed
to b
e ad
apte
d to
bet
ter
alig
n w
ith y
our
goal
s
for
stud
ent a
chie
vem
ent?
D. W
hat m
ater
ials
mig
ht y
ou n
eed
to d
evis
e in
ord
er to
sup
plem
ent t
hose
you
alre
ady
have
? W
hy?
2002
Wes
tEd®
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
t Ed
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
eat
Wes
tEd
LES
SO
N/U
NIT
PLA
NN
ING
CO
NF
ER
EN
CE
INT
ER
VIE
W P
RO
TO
CO
L
The
inte
rvie
wer
will
wan
t to
wal
k th
e te
ache
r th
roug
h a
serie
s of
ques
tions
that
mod
el th
e pr
oces
s of
inst
ruct
iona
l pla
nnin
g. T
hey
wou
ldin
clud
e qu
estio
ns li
ke th
ese:
Whi
le w
orki
ng w
ith th
e te
ache
r in
this
pla
nnin
g co
nfer
ence
, lis
ten
for
whe
ther
the
teac
her
know
s an
d/or
doe
s th
ese
thin
gs:
I. B
riefly
des
crib
e th
e st
uden
ts fo
r w
hom
this
less
on/u
nit i
s pl
anne
d.H
as c
onsi
dere
d w
hich
stu
dent
s ha
ve p
rere
quis
ite k
now
ledg
e an
d sk
ills
Kno
ws
indi
vidu
al s
tude
nts
and
thei
r le
arni
ng n
eeds
Gro
ups
stud
ents
in r
elat
ion
to th
eir
lear
ning
nee
ds
2. W
hat s
tand
ard(
s) a
re b
eing
add
ress
ed in
this
less
on/u
nit?
Wha
t do
you
wan
t stu
dent
s to
kno
w a
nd b
e ab
le to
do
as th
e re
sult
of th
is le
sson
/uni
t?C
lear
ly a
rtic
ulat
es g
oals
in te
rms
of w
hat s
tude
nts
will
be
requ
ired
to k
now
and
do
Beg
ins
to a
rtic
ulat
e th
e cr
iteria
on
whi
ch s
tude
nt p
erfo
rman
ce w
ill b
e ju
dged
3. H
ow d
o yo
u kn
ow th
at th
ese
goal
s ar
e su
itabl
e fo
r th
is g
roup
of s
tude
nts
at th
is ti
me?
Has
con
side
red/
asse
ssed
prio
r kn
owle
dge
Pla
ns a
nd s
eque
nces
less
ons
appr
opria
te to
con
tent
Kno
ws
dist
rict/s
choo
l exp
ecta
tions
for
stud
ent p
erfo
rman
ce
4. H
ow d
o yo
u pl
an to
ass
ess
stud
ent l
earn
ing
in th
is le
sson
/uni
t? D
escr
ibe
the
task
(s)
and
the
crite
ria y
ou w
ill u
se.
Use
s ta
sks/
ques
tions
that
are
fair
and
actu
ally
ass
ess
wha
t the
y ar
e m
eant
to a
sses
s
Ens
ures
that
dat
a w
ill b
e av
aila
ble
for
each
stu
dent
Pla
ns to
con
duct
bot
h fo
rmat
ive
and
sum
mat
ive
asse
ssm
ents
Gat
hers
evi
denc
e of
stu
dent
lear
ning
effi
cien
tly a
nd e
ffect
ivel
y
Und
erst
ands
the
qual
ity o
f the
evi
denc
e th
e as
sess
men
t will
pro
vide
and
whe
ther
mor
e or
diff
eren
t evi
denc
e w
ill b
e ne
eded
Art
icul
ates
crit
eria
for
succ
ess
in te
rms
of s
peci
fic c
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
wor
k,no
t jus
t its
leng
th o
r ap
pear
ance
, or
stud
ent's
effo
rt
5. If
this
is a
less
on p
lan,
how
doe
s th
is le
sson
rel
ate
to b
road
er g
oals
for
stud
ent p
erfo
rman
ce?
For
exa
mpl
e, is
this
less
on p
art o
f a la
rger
uni
t?W
hat w
ill s
tude
nts
be r
equi
red
to k
now
and
do
at th
e co
nclu
sion
of t
heun
it? H
ow w
ill y
ou a
sses
s st
uden
t lea
rnin
g of
thos
e th
ings
?
Est
ablis
hes
perf
orm
ance
sta
ndar
ds/g
radi
ng c
riter
ia th
at a
re a
ppro
pria
tely
benc
hmar
ked
to d
istr
ict s
tand
ards
Doe
s lo
ng-r
ange
pla
nnin
g; d
emon
stra
tes
know
ledg
e of
app
ropr
iate
seq
uenc
ing
Has
the
abili
ty to
ana
lyze
larg
er ta
sks
and
brea
k th
em d
own
in o
rder
to p
rovi
deap
prop
riate
opp
ortu
nitie
s to
lear
n
Con
side
rs a
sses
smen
t iss
ues
in #
4
© 2
002
Wes
tEd®
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
tEd
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
eat
Wes
tEd
LES
SO
N/U
NIT
PLA
NN
ING
CO
NF
ER
EN
CE
INT
ER
VIE
W P
RO
TO
CO
L
6. H
ow d
o th
ese
goal
s re
late
to th
e di
stric
t's c
onte
nt a
nd p
erfo
rman
cest
anda
rds
for
stud
ents
?
Kno
ws
dist
rict e
xpec
tatio
ns fo
r st
uden
t per
form
ance
Can
art
icul
ate
requ
isite
qua
lity
crite
ria o
r ap
prop
riate
indi
cato
rs r
equi
red
inst
uden
t per
form
ance
Bre
aks
dow
n st
anda
rds
into
spe
cific
indi
cato
rs to
gui
de in
stru
ctio
nal p
lann
ing
7. H
ow c
omfo
rtab
le d
o yo
u fe
el w
ith th
e co
nten
t inv
olve
d in
this
less
on/
unit?
Wha
t, if
anyt
hing
, will
you
nee
d to
do
to p
repa
re y
ours
elf t
o te
ach
this
less
on /u
nit?
Is a
war
e of
ow
n co
nten
t kno
wle
dge
stre
ngth
s an
d w
eakn
esse
s
Has
str
ateg
ies
for
addr
essi
ng p
erso
nal g
aps
in c
onte
nt k
now
ledg
e
8. W
hat d
iffic
ultie
s an
d /o
r m
isco
ncep
tions
do
stud
ents
typi
cally
hav
e w
ithth
e m
ater
ial /
cont
ent o
f thi
s le
sson
/uni
t? W
hat w
ill y
ou d
o to
add
ress
the
diffi
culti
es y
ou a
ntic
ipat
e?
Has
app
ropr
iate
con
tent
kno
wle
dge
as d
emon
stra
ted
in a
rtic
ulat
ion
of c
omm
onm
isco
ncep
tions
and
pla
ns to
add
ress
them
Tea
cher
's p
lans
to a
ddre
ss c
omm
on m
isco
ncep
tions
dem
onst
rate
und
erst
andi
ng
of h
ow s
tude
nts
lear
n
9. W
hat l
earn
ing
oppo
rtun
ities
hav
e yo
u pl
anne
d to
ens
ure
that
eve
ryst
uden
t will
be
prep
ared
to d
emon
stra
te a
chie
vem
ent o
f the
sta
ndar
d(s)
?W
hat w
ill y
ou d
o to
ens
ure
that
they
hav
e ad
equa
te in
form
atio
n an
dop
port
uniti
es fo
r bo
th g
uide
d an
d in
depe
nden
t pra
ctic
e?W
hat w
ill th
est
uden
ts d
o? H
ow d
o th
ese
plan
s re
flect
wha
t you
kno
w a
bout
the
vario
usst
uden
ts in
this
cla
ss o
r gr
oup?
Has
the
abili
ty to
mak
e co
nnec
tions
to s
tude
nts'
prio
r kn
owle
dge
in th
isco
nten
t are
a an
d/or
to o
ther
dis
cipl
ines
Has
the
abili
ty to
des
ign
less
ons
that
are
alig
ned
to o
utco
mes
for
wha
t stu
dent
sw
ill n
eed
to k
now
and
do
Has
the
will
ingn
ess
and
abili
ty to
diff
eren
tiate
inst
ruct
ion
as a
ppro
pria
te
Has
the
logi
c an
d sk
ill in
less
on d
esig
n
Ens
ures
the
prov
isio
n of
ade
quat
e in
form
atio
n an
d op
port
uniti
es fo
r gu
ided
and
inde
pend
ent p
ract
ice
10. W
hat i
nstr
uctio
nal m
ater
ials
do
you
plan
to u
se?
Why
hav
e yo
uch
osen
thes
e?
Has
the
abili
ty to
rec
ogni
ze a
ppro
pria
te in
stru
ctio
nal r
esou
rces
Has
the
abili
ty to
ada
pt in
stru
ctio
nal m
ater
ials
as
need
ed to
rea
ch s
tude
nt
achi
evem
ent g
oals
©20
02W
estE
crA
ll rig
hts
Res
erve
d. P
erm
issi
on to
rep
rodu
ce w
ith W
estE
d co
pyrig
ht n
otic
e is
her
eby
gran
ted.
Wes
tern
Ass
essm
ent C
olla
bora
tive
atW
estE
d
FR
AM
EW
OR
K F
OR
GU
IDIN
G L
ES
SO
N/U
NIT
RE
FLE
CT
ION
S
Ref
lect
ive
ques
tions
to b
e fr
amed
by
the
inte
rvie
wer
Wha
t mig
ht w
e ho
pe to
hea
r in
the
teac
her's
res
pons
es?
Rel
ated
to th
e te
ache
r's s
kills
in a
naly
zing
res
ults
:
I.G
iven
the
wor
k th
e st
uden
ts p
rodu
ced,
was
you
r le
sson
/uni
t suc
cess
ful?
2. G
iven
the
evid
ence
from
stu
dent
wor
k, w
hat w
ill y
ou n
eed
to r
etea
ch?
How
will
you
r in
stru
ctio
n di
ffer
whe
n yo
u re
teac
h th
is s
kill(
s)?
3. D
id y
our
anal
ysis
of s
tude
nt w
ork
indi
cate
that
you
wer
e rig
ht a
bout
wha
tsk
ills
you
need
ed to
teac
h to
pre
pare
stu
dent
s fo
r th
e as
sess
men
t you
gav
e?
4. W
here
are
you
goi
ng n
ext w
ith s
tude
nts
who
did
wel
l on
this
ass
essm
ent?
Why
?
The
teac
her
offe
rs e
vide
nce
of s
tude
nt le
arni
ng fr
om s
tude
nt w
ork.
The
teac
her
does
a c
aref
ul a
naly
sis
of s
tude
nt w
ork
and
uses
this
info
rmat
ion
toas
sess
:
his
or h
er a
ssum
ptio
ns a
bout
wha
t is
need
ed o
r st
ill n
eeds
to b
e ta
ught
;th
e ef
fect
iven
ess
of h
is o
r he
r ow
n te
achi
ng;
the
spec
ific
conc
epts
or
skill
s th
at m
ay n
eed
to b
e re
taug
ht a
nd to
whi
chst
uden
ts; a
nd
whe
ther
to p
roce
ed a
ccor
ding
to h
is o
r he
r lo
ng-r
ange
cou
rse
plan
s or
toad
just
thes
e in
som
e w
ay to
bet
ter
mee
t stu
dent
s' n
eeds
.
Rel
ated
to th
e te
ache
r's c
onte
nt k
now
ledg
e:
I. H
ow d
id y
ou d
ecid
e w
heth
er to
teac
h/as
sess
all
of th
e su
bski
lls in
clud
ed in
the
stan
dard
(s)
or to
focu
s on
a n
arro
wer
set
?
2. H
ow, i
f at a
ll, d
id y
ou n
eed
to p
repa
re y
ours
elf t
o te
ach
the
cont
ent d
escr
ibed
inth
is s
tand
ard(
s)?
3. W
hat p
rior
know
ledg
e di
d yo
ur s
tude
nts
have
that
con
vinc
ed y
ou th
is w
as a
nap
prop
riate
sta
ndar
d or
gro
up o
f sta
ndar
ds to
teac
h to
at t
his
time?
4. H
ow d
id y
ou d
raw
on
that
prio
r kn
owle
dge
in p
lann
ing
or c
ondu
ctin
g yo
urle
sson
?
5. W
hat c
onne
ctio
ns d
id y
ou m
ake
for
your
stu
dent
s be
twee
n th
e kn
owle
dge
orsk
ills
requ
ired
by th
is s
tand
ard
and
othe
r co
ncep
ts w
ithin
this
con
tent
are
a or
in o
ther
con
tent
are
as?
The
teac
her
chos
e a
reas
onab
le s
lice
of in
stru
ctio
n ba
sed
on a
n un
ders
tand
ing
ofth
e co
nten
t and
of s
tude
nts'
nee
ds. W
hen
narr
ow s
kills
wer
e se
lect
ed, t
he te
ache
ris
abl
e to
put
them
in c
onte
xt a
nd r
elat
e th
em to
larg
er, m
ore
com
plex
ski
lls o
rco
ncep
ts to
be
lear
ned
late
r. If
the
less
on/u
nit a
ddre
ssed
sev
eral
rel
ated
sta
ndar
ds,
the
teac
her
can
desc
ribe
how
they
fit t
oget
her
and
the
ratio
nale
for
sequ
enci
ngth
em in
this
par
ticul
ar w
ay.
The
teac
her's
kno
wle
dge
of th
e co
nten
t allo
ws
him
or
her
to m
ake
conn
ectio
nsbe
twee
n th
e pl
anne
d le
sson
/uni
t and
prio
r kn
owle
dge
in th
is d
isci
plin
e an
d to
rela
ted
conc
epts
in o
ther
dis
cipl
ines
.
Whe
n th
e te
ache
r is
uns
ure
of k
ey c
once
pts
or s
kills
to b
e ad
dres
sed
in th
e le
sson
,
he o
r sh
e se
eks
deep
er u
nder
stan
ding
in p
repa
ratio
n fo
r th
e le
sson
/uni
t.
Rel
ated
to th
e te
ache
r's a
bilit
y to
des
ign
or s
elec
t app
ropr
iate
asse
ssm
ents
:
I. A
t wha
t poi
nts
in th
e le
sson
/uni
t did
you
col
lect
dat
a on
wha
t stu
dent
s w
ere
lear
ning
and
wha
t the
y m
ay n
ot h
ave
unde
rsto
od?
Wha
t str
ateg
ies
did
you
use
to c
olle
ct d
ata
at th
ese
vario
us p
oint
s?
2. H
ow d
id y
ou fe
el a
bout
the
cong
ruen
ce o
f you
r as
sess
men
t tas
k an
d th
est
anda
rds
you
had
chos
en to
teac
h?
The
teac
her
plan
ned
and
used
bot
h fo
rmat
ive
and
sum
mat
ive
asse
ssm
ents
.F
orm
ativ
e as
sess
men
ts w
ere
desi
gned
and
tim
ed s
o th
ey c
ould
be
used
to a
djus
t
inst
ruct
ion
appr
opria
tely
to s
tude
nts'
nee
ds.
© 2
002
Wes
tEd®
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
t Ed
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
eat
Wes
tEd
FR
AM
EW
OR
K F
OR
GU
IDIN
G L
ES
SO
N/U
NIT
RE
FLE
CT
ION
S
3. W
hat t
rade
-offs
did
you
con
side
r in
des
igni
ng th
is a
sses
smen
t and
why
did
you
mak
e th
e de
cisi
ons
you
did?
For
exa
mpl
e:to
allo
w s
tude
nts
to u
se c
erta
in r
esou
rces
or
requ
ire th
em to
wor
k w
ithou
tus
ing
reso
urce
s;
to a
llow
gro
up w
ork
or to
req
uire
inde
pend
ent e
ffort
s so
that
you
cou
ld g
et"c
lean
" da
ta o
n ea
ch s
tude
nt;
to d
esig
n an
aut
hent
ic r
eal-w
orld
task
, or
to c
ontr
ol th
e in
form
atio
n al
lst
uden
ts r
ecei
ved
so th
at y
ou c
ould
be
sure
all
stud
ents
exp
erie
nced
asi
mila
r ch
alle
nge;
or
to g
ive
one
over
all s
core
, or
to g
ive
anal
ytic
al fe
edba
ck o
n se
vera
l diff
eren
t
impo
rtan
t crit
eria
.
4. L
ooki
ng b
ack
on th
e as
sess
men
t now
that
you
hav
e gi
ven
it, c
ould
you
hav
ede
sign
ed it
in a
ny o
ther
way
to:
impr
ove
the
qual
ity o
f the
dat
a it
prov
ided
to y
ou o
r yo
ur s
tude
nts,
impr
ove
its a
lignm
ent t
o th
e st
anda
rds,
impr
ove
the
auth
entic
ity o
f the
task
or
leve
l of e
ngag
emen
t of y
our
stud
ents
,im
prov
e th
e cl
arity
of t
he in
stru
ctio
ns, o
rim
prov
e on
the
num
ber
of o
ptio
ns s
tude
nts
had
for
show
ing
wha
t the
y kn
ow?
5. W
hat c
riter
ia d
id y
ou u
se to
judg
e st
uden
t wor
k? H
ow d
id y
ou a
rriv
e at
thos
ecr
iteria
?
6. H
ow a
re th
ese
stan
dard
(s)
asse
ssed
on
high
-sta
kes
asse
ssm
ents
? H
ow u
sefu
l
was
this
less
on in
pre
parin
g st
uden
ts to
dem
onst
rate
wha
t the
y've
lear
ned
in
that
form
at?
The
teac
her
desi
gned
or
sele
cted
ass
essm
ents
that
pro
vide
app
ropr
iate
evi
denc
eof
the
stan
dard
(s)
and
can
desc
ribe
the
stre
ngth
s an
d lim
itatio
ns o
f the
cho
sen
asse
ssm
ent s
trat
egy.
The
teac
her
accu
rate
ly d
escr
ibes
wha
t can
be
lear
ned
from
the
asse
ssm
ent h
e or
she
gave
and
wha
t oth
er k
inds
of a
sses
smen
t inf
orm
atio
n m
ay n
eed
to b
e
colle
cted
to g
et o
ther
crit
ical
info
rmat
ion
abou
t stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t of t
hese
stan
dard
s.
The
teac
her
uses
the
resu
lts fr
om th
is a
sses
smen
t to
eval
uate
his
or
her
own
asse
ssm
ent s
trat
egie
s.
The
crit
eria
use
d to
ass
ess
stud
ent w
ork
are
rigor
ous
and
adeq
uate
ly a
ligne
d to
the
scho
ol's
/dis
tric
t's e
xpec
tatio
ns fo
r st
uden
t per
form
ance
.
The
teac
her
is a
war
e of
the
rela
tions
hip
of th
is le
sson
/uni
t to
high
-sta
kes
asse
ssm
ents
and
may
hav
e in
trod
uced
stu
dent
s to
that
form
at; b
ut, t
he te
ache
r
has
not l
imite
d cl
assr
oom
ass
essm
ent s
trat
egie
s to
mul
tiple
-cho
ice
or s
hort
-an
swer
form
ats
if th
ey a
re n
ot a
ppro
pria
te fo
r as
sess
ing
deep
und
erst
andi
ng o
fth
e co
nten
t.
Rel
ated
to th
e te
ache
r's s
kill
in p
lann
ing
effe
ctiv
e in
stru
ctio
n:
I. W
hat e
vide
nce
did
you
use
to d
eter
min
e w
hich
of y
our
stud
ents
wer
e re
ady
for
this
less
on/u
nit?
Now
that
the
less
on/u
nit i
s co
mpl
ete,
wer
e yo
u rig
ht?
2. H
ow d
id y
ou h
elp
stud
ents
und
erst
and
wha
t the
y w
ould
be
expe
cted
to k
now
and
do a
s a
resu
lt of
this
less
on/u
nit?
3. W
hat c
omm
on m
isco
ncep
tions
or
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
gs o
n th
e pa
rt o
f stu
dent
sgu
ided
you
r in
stru
ctio
nal p
lann
ing
in r
elat
ion
to th
is s
tand
ard(
s)?
4. W
hat o
ppor
tuni
ties
to le
arn
and
perf
orm
/pra
ctic
e di
d yo
u pl
an to
hel
p yo
urst
uden
ts p
repa
re fo
r th
is a
sses
smen
t?
The
teac
her
can
prod
uce
or c
ite e
vide
nce
of s
tude
nts
havi
ng p
rere
quis
itekn
owle
dge
or s
kills
and
/or
had
a pl
an fo
r ad
dres
sing
crit
ical
mis
sing
pie
ces
with
inth
e le
sson
/uni
t.
The
teac
her
taug
ht s
tude
nts
the
crite
ria o
n w
hich
thei
r w
ork
wou
ld b
e ju
dged
,pr
efer
ably
by
usin
g m
odel
s or
exe
mpl
ars
of s
tude
nt w
ork.
The
teac
her
used
his
or
her
know
ledg
e of
the
cont
ent t
o an
ticip
ate
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
gs s
tude
nts
wou
ld h
ave
and
to a
ddre
ss th
em in
the
less
on/u
nit.
© 2
002
Wes
t Ed9
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
t Ed
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
eat
Wes
tEd
FR
AM
EW
OR
K F
OR
GU
IDIN
G L
ES
SO
N/U
NIT
RE
FLE
CT
ION
S
5. C
an y
ou g
ive
exam
ples
of t
he w
ays
in w
hich
you
diff
eren
tiate
d in
stru
ctio
n to
ensu
re th
at e
very
stu
dent
was
pre
pare
d to
do
wel
l on
the
asse
ssm
ent?
6.In
wha
t way
s di
d yo
u en
cour
age
and
supp
ort s
tude
nts
to a
sses
s th
eir
own
wor
k-in
-pro
gres
s?
7. W
hat e
vide
nce
did
you
use
to d
eter
min
e w
hen
stud
ents
wer
e re
ady
to ta
keth
e as
sess
men
t? D
id y
ou a
llow
for
any
exce
ptio
ns o
r sp
ecia
l circ
umst
ance
s fo
rst
uden
ts w
ho w
ere
not r
eady
?
The
teac
her
thor
ough
ly a
naly
zed
wha
t stu
dent
s w
ould
nee
d to
lear
n to
be
prep
ared
to a
chie
ve th
e pe
rfor
man
ce s
tand
ard,
and
he
or s
he p
lann
ed a
nd ta
ught
alig
ned
less
ons.
(H
ere
the
teac
her
will
wan
t to
offe
r ev
iden
ce o
f les
son/
unit
plan
ning
. If t
he p
lans
see
med
app
ropr
iate
, but
the
resu
lts o
f the
ass
essm
ent w
ere
not a
dequ
ate,
it m
ay b
e im
port
ant t
o ob
serv
e th
e te
ache
r's d
eliv
ery
of th
ese
less
ons
to s
ee w
hat m
ay b
e ge
tting
in th
e w
ay o
f stu
dent
lear
ning
.)
The
teac
her
prov
ides
evi
denc
e of
hav
ing
antic
ipat
ed th
e ne
ed to
diff
eren
tiate
inst
ruct
ion
for
diffe
rent
sub
grou
ps o
f stu
dent
s w
ith s
peci
al n
eeds
, as
wel
l as
prov
idin
g le
sson
pla
ns th
at s
how
a d
iffer
ent a
ppro
ach
for
stud
ents
who
did
not
"get
it"
the
first
tim
e.
The
teac
her
gave
stu
dent
s pe
riodi
c op
port
uniti
es to
ass
ess
thei
r ow
n pr
ogre
ssag
ains
t the
crit
eria
in th
e pe
rfor
man
ce s
tand
ard
and
gave
them
feed
back
on
the
accu
racy
of t
heir
own
self-
asse
ssm
ents
.
The
teac
her
prov
ides
evi
denc
e of
hav
ing
give
n bo
th g
uide
d an
d in
depe
nden
tpr
actic
e op
port
uniti
es to
stu
dent
s in
pre
para
tion
for
sum
mat
ive
asse
ssm
ent t
asks
.
Rel
ated
to th
e te
ache
r's s
kills
in e
stab
lishi
ng s
tand
ards
and
giv
ing
The
teac
her
know
s th
ere
are
a va
riety
of f
orm
ats
for
scor
ing
stud
ent w
ork
and
feed
back
to s
tude
nts:
uses
hol
istic
and
mor
e an
alyt
ical
form
ats
as a
ppro
pria
te.
I. W
hat f
orm
at d
id y
ou u
se to
sco
re th
e as
sess
men
t and
why
?T
he te
ache
r ch
ose
a fo
rmat
for
scor
ing
the
asse
ssm
ent t
hat i
s ef
ficie
nt a
nd, a
s
2. W
hat d
o yo
u kn
ow a
bout
how
you
r pe
rfor
man
ce e
xpec
tatio
ns a
lign
with
muc
h as
pos
sibl
e, p
rovi
des
stud
ents
with
info
rmat
ion
on w
hich
crit
eria
they
met
thos
e of
oth
er te
ache
rs w
ho a
re te
achi
ng to
the
sam
e co
nten
t sta
ndar
d(s)
?an
d w
hich
they
did
not
.
3. W
ere
all o
f the
"cr
iteria
for
succ
ess"
you
iden
tifie
d eq
ually
wei
ghte
d in
you
rT
he te
ache
r ha
s pa
rtic
ipat
ed in
col
legi
al s
tand
ard-
setti
ng p
roce
sses
, dra
wn
on
scor
ing?
Why
or
why
not
?co
mm
on s
corin
g cr
iteria
or
exem
plar
s, a
nd/o
r va
lidat
ed h
is o
r he
r ju
dgm
ents
of
stud
ent w
ork
in s
ome
othe
r w
ay.
4. H
ow w
ere
stud
ents
pro
vide
d fe
edba
ck o
n th
e qu
ality
of t
heir
perf
orm
ance
?Lo
okin
g ba
ck o
n th
at d
ecis
ion,
was
the
feed
back
you
pro
vide
d us
eful
in h
elpi
ngT
he te
ache
r ha
s a
ratio
nale
for
the
emph
asis
giv
en to
var
ious
crit
eria
, and
it a
ligns
stud
ents
impr
ove
thei
r w
ork
in r
elat
ion
to th
is s
tand
ard(
s)?
with
dis
tric
t or
scho
ol p
erfo
rman
ce s
tand
ards
.
5. L
ooki
ng b
ack
on w
hat y
ou d
id, w
ould
you
hav
e ch
ange
d th
ese
crite
ria in
any
The
teac
her
prov
ides
evi
denc
e th
at h
is o
r he
r fe
edba
ck to
stu
dent
s is
spe
cific
and
way
?re
late
d to
agr
eed-
upon
dis
tric
t or
scho
ol p
erfo
rman
ce s
tand
ards
.
6. W
ill s
tude
nts
have
an
oppo
rtun
ity to
rev
ise
or im
prov
e th
eir
wor
k? W
hy o
rT
he te
ache
r pr
ovid
es o
ppor
tuni
ties
for
stud
ents
to im
prov
e th
eir
wor
k ba
sed
on
why
not
?th
e fe
edba
ck th
ey a
re g
iven
.
The
teac
her
does
not
low
er s
tand
ards
bas
ed o
n st
uden
t wor
k pr
oduc
ed, b
ut m
ayha
ve m
ade
plan
s to
circ
le b
ack
to a
ddre
ss th
e ne
eds
of s
ome
stud
ents
.
2002
Wes
tE&
All
right
s R
eser
ved.
Per
mis
sion
to r
epro
duce
with
Wes
t Ed
copy
right
not
ice
is h
ereb
y gr
ante
d.W
este
rn A
sses
smen
t Col
labo
rativ
eat
WeS
tEd
INSTRUCTIONAL VIGNETTE: BEN FRYER
lizchin7 Ykay graders 10 rife a leporl otilormalion
Ben Fryer teaches third grade. His class of 22 studentsincludes 10 native English speakers and 12 whose homelanguage is Spanish. Of those 12 students, 5 are consideredfluent in English while the others range from moderately tonearly fluent. All students do their writing in English.Students are assigned seats so that each working groupincludes some English-only students and others that represent
the range of fluency.
Ben's students have just returned from early morning recessand have gone directly to their seats. They know the routinewell; it's Writing Time. Today, Ben has asked for the
class's attention.
Today, we are going to begin a new unit in writing. For thelast two weeks, during our reading time we have beenlearning to recognize fiction and nonfiction. As he speaks,Ben points to the words he has written on the boardfiction and nonfiction and, in Spanish, ficcion and no ficcion.He mentions how much the Spanish words sound and looklike the English words.
We learned that not all writing tells a story. Sometimesauthors write to share information. We learned that infiction, the author tells a story about a set of characters.In nonfiction, the author writes about a subject so that thereader can learn the facts about that topic. We learned thatCharlotte's Web is fiction. It tells a story about a pig namedWilber. We also looked at All About Pigs. It is nonfiction.It is about pigs, too. But instead of telling a story about oneparticular pig, it gives information about many kinds of pigs:where they live, what they eat, how they are alike and
different from each other.
Sometimes the title of a story or book gives us a clue about
whether it is fiction or nonfiction. Look at the question I havewritten on the board and tell me which answer is correct:
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
81
Which of the following books is likely to be an example ofnonfiction?
A. Black Beauty
B. My Friend, FlickaC. The Facts About Horses
As Ben reads the question aloud, he holds up the cover foreach of the books. The cover illustrations provide his Englishlearners with additional clues about the nature of each book.
Today we are going to begin to learn about writing our ownnonfiction. One kind of nonfiction is "a report." Ben writesthe word "report" next to the word "nonfiction," first inEnglish and then in Spanish, as he says the words aloud.
To write a report, the author collects lots of information abouta subject and writes it so that others can learn about thatsubject by reading his report. Writing a report is a good wayto tell others what you know or have learned about something.When we are finished, each of you will be able to write areport about an animal you are interested in. (An example ofBen Fryer's Unit Plan is included at the end of this vignette.)
To get started, I brought us some examples of animal reportsdone by other students. We are going to look at them andthink about how they can help us learn about good reports ornonfiction writing. Let's read Paper A together. As we read it,
think about how the paper helps you learn about dolphins.(A copy of the two exemplars Ben will use are included at theend of this vignette.)
Ben reads the paper aloud while projecting it on the overheadand asks students to follow along on the copies he has handedout to them. On the handout, under key nouns and verbs inthe report, he has written each word in Spanish. I'd like eachof you to think of at least one way that the author of Paper Ahelps us learn about dolphins. After pausing, Ben asks Jeff toshare the one thing he thought about.
"The author tells what dolphins eat."
© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
82
Ben writes, "tells what the dolphin eats" on a wall chart titled,
"What makes a good animal report?"
Ben then gives students two minutes to underline two otherfacts in the report they have read and to share those with apartner. This work in pairs allows time for his Englishlearners to practice what Jeff has modeled. Ben then calls onstudents who want to add to the chart. When possible, asBen writes on the chart, he draws an icon over a key verb ornoun to illustrate its meaning for those students less familiarwith English vocabulary.
OK, so there are a couple of things we think make this paper agood report. Now let's look at Paper B. It is a report abouthorses. I will read this to you as you follow along. As you read
the paper, think about what makes this a good report.
After reviewing the second paper, the children offer the
following additional criteria:The sentences are facts.
The author shows that he knows a lot about the
animal.
The author uses good words to help the reader
understand.The ideas in the report are not all mixed up.The writing is neat and the paragraphs are indented.
Most of the words are spelled correctly.
As these criteria are offered, Ben stops to show the studentsspecific examples of each characteristic in the sample papers.Sometimes he contrasts the characteristic with a specificexample from the weaker paper.
When Caleb says that the "ideas in the report are not allmixed up," Ben stops to show the class what Caleb means.Look at Paper B. Can you see that the author tells threethings about what horses eat and puts those three ideastogether in the same paragraph? As he points out these threesentences, he draws the icon for eating next to each to showthey are about the same thing. He has another whole para-graph about where horses live. As he says this, Ben points tothis paragraph on the overhead and reads the sentences
© 2002 WestEd °All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
A
aloud. Now, let's look again at Paper A. This author also tellsmore than one fact about his animal but notice that he saysone thing about where dolphins live. Then he tells somethingabout what dolphins eat. Then he has another sentence abouthow they can get sick. His ideas are all mixed up instead ofbeing grouped into paragraphs.
When the students have exhausted their list of qualitycriteria, Ben points to one or two of his own. I also liked thefact that the author who wrote Paper B wrote a topicsentence to tell what the paragraph was about. Look at thethird paragraph. The first sentence tells us that this will beabout what horses eat.
When we are finished with the unit on writing nonfictionreports, you are going to be able to write your own reportthat does all of these things. I will leave this chart on the wallso that when you write your own report, you can check to seethat it does all these things.
Today, we are going to take the first step in preparing towrite our report. Reports can be about anything an authorwants to write about, but the report we are going to write forpractice in this unit is a report about an animal. So, today,we want to spend some time thinking about what animal wewill write about.
Ben has the students work in trios at their table groups tocome up with a list of animals about which they may wantto write reports. Students are encouraged to offer their ideas
in either Spanish or English.
After five minutes, Ben brings the students together and eachgroup shares its ideas. As they do, he writes the name of theanimal, first in English and then in Spanish under the letterthe word begins with. The list of animals is duplicated foreach student and the children are assigned to take the listhome and talk with their parents about what animal theymight want to write about. Ben sends the note below homein both Spanish, and English, describing the assignment tothe parents or guardians. He also leaves the same message inboth languages on his homework voicemail.
© 2002 WestEd °All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
8 4
Dear Parents and Guardians,
Today, we started a unit on writing reports. When wefinish the unit, every student will be able to write areport about an animal showing that he or she:
knows the difference between reports and stories;
can organize his or her writing into paragraphs;
can help the reader understand interesting facts about
the topic; andcan use correct punctuation and spelling so the reader
can understand what is written.
We will also get to practice finding information or factsby talking with others and by using books, magazines,
and the Internet.
Tonight, I would like you to help your child choose ananimal to write about. I've attached the list of animalswe thought of today in class. Help your child choose ananimal that he or she is interested in, knows about, orwants to know more about. You might also want toguide your child to write about an animal you knowsomething about so you can help him or her. Pleasehave your child write the name of the animal he or shewill be writing about on the line below.
Thank you for helping your child,
Mr. Fryer
The second day....
Ben begins the writing period by asking the class to brain-storm in small groups what they might like to find out in areport about an animal. He reminds the class that reportsshould help the reader answer questions he or she might haveabout the topic. After allowing five minutes for the studentsto generate their own ideas, he calls on various students andrecords their thoughts on a wall chart that will hang in theclassroom for the duration of the unit. The chart includesquestions such as:
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
© 2002 WestEd ®All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
ti
What does the animal eat?
Where does it live?
When Carlos offers, "I want to know about los colorer ysize," Ben says, Carlos wants to know what the animal lookslike, and writes, "What color is it?" and "How big is it?" onthe chart.
Ben then introduces a book on kangaroos and says that thisbook is a report about kangaroos. He shows everyone thepages that address the various questions they have just asked,with pictures of the kangaroo showing its size and color,what it eats, and where it lives. Having introduced the bookwith this brief picture walk so that his English learners knowwhat to expect, he then asks the students to listen as he readsaloud so they can identify any other questions aboutkangaroos the book might help them answer. After hearingthe book aloud, students add the following questions to thelist of topics to address in their reports:
How does the animal move?
What does it look like when it is born?
Do people use this animal for a pet or for work?
Ben then asks his students what other kinds of informationthey might want to know about kangaroos. All questions areadded to the wall chart.
After each student has selected a topic for his or her animalreport, Ben provides lessons on finding information. Heinvites the students to collect facts by interviewing theirparents or other adults. He also introduces various textsources, such as encyclopedias, nonfiction text, andmagazines at all reading levels, as well as introducing hisstudents to the Internet. Students are told to use thesevarious sources to find facts for their reports. They arereminded to look for information that will help them answerthe kinds of questions listed on the wall chart. With each ofthese sources, Ben demonstrates how to use titles, tables ofcontents, chapter headings, and indexes to locate informa-tional text.
© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
S PI
Ben knows that mastering use of these structural features oftext is a third-grade standard. He also understands that,because students will be doing their research both in classand outside of class, the report-writing activity will notprovide adequate opportunity for him to assess whether allstudents have mastered this standard. However, he recognizesthat the activity offers students an important opportunity topractice using these materials. He makes note that he willneed to develop specific assessments of this third-gradestandard at another time.
Ben explains that each time students find out a fact abouttheir animal, they are to write it on a sentence strip. Benmodels this by drawing from the earlier read-aloud session tomake two sentence strips that tell facts about kangaroos. Ashe writes the model sentences, he reminds students aboutpast lessons on sentence writing.
Remember that we said a sentence needs to be a completethought. So when we write a fact about the kangaroo, wedon't write "moves fast. " Instead, we want to write,"Kangaroos move very fast."
Ben uses sentence strips so that when his students are readyto organize their writing into paragraphs later in the unit,they will understand that writers often "move ideas around"to make their writing more comprehensible. Students will beasked to physically group the sentences to form paragraphs.
Students are told that they will be collecting facts for the nextfour or five days. Ben suggests that students set a goal offinding two facts a day, from any source they can. He makessure the classroom contains many resources, in both Spanishand English, about different animals. He lets students knowthat he will be available before and after school to help them
use the classroom resources.
Ben expects that most of his students will draw on materialsin the classroom library or interview a parent to get informa-tion for their reports. But he suspects that some students maybe ready to explore a variety of other sources. Although hedoes not plan to hold all students accountable for using
© 2002 WesrEd °All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with4estEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
40
multiple sources at this time, he makes note of those stud-ents already able to do it. In preparation for learning tobuild a bibliography, he has those students write the type ofsource used on the back of their sentence strip.
The next several days....
Throughout the week, Ben sets up a number of opportuni-ties for students to share some of what they are finding out.For example, when dismissing students to lunch he asks forvolunteers to tell one fact about "what your animal eats" or"where your animal lives." Students are dismissed when theyoffer an example. When taking roll, he asks students to holdup the sentence strips they made the day before. It is a quickand easy way to see which students are having difficultyfinding and recording facts.
Writing time on each of the following days is used to teach amini lesson on one of the characteristics required in the finalreport. Ben plans and conducts lessons on:
organizing sentences dealing with the same topic into
paragraphs, writing a topic sentence, and indenting the
first line; and
using descriptive language or the strategy of "showing,
not telling" to help the reader better understand.
Each of Ben's mini lessons starts with a reminder of thequality criteria and a look at the original exemplars for areminder of what that skill or characteristic looks like whendone correctly and/or how the weaker example might bemade better. Students are then given several practice exercisesto work on alone or in small groups. Ben models completingone or more of the practice exercises before asking studentsto work. As they complete the exercises, Ben circulatesaround the room to clarify instructions, coach individualstudents, and look at the work they are producing to ensurethat each student is being successful.
As homework, students are given a few practice exercisessimilar to those done in class. To prepare students for howthese same skills might be addressed on large-scale assess-
ments, Ben also gives them some multiple-choice problems
© 2002 WestEd °All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
88
addressing the skills. (Classroom practice exercises andhomework for the two mini lessons are included at the endof this vignette.)
Ben uses his observations of student work both classwork
and homework to decide whether students are ready to use
a new skill on their own in their reports and, if not, to diag-
nose what they do not understand. When necessary, he pulls
students having similar difficulties into a small ad hoc groupto clear up misconceptions and/or reteach the new skill.
While watching students complete exercises on organizingsentences into paragraphs, Ben notes that although most ofhis English learners and even some students who are fluent inEnglish understand the concept of organizing around a singletopic, they do not include transition phrases between sen-tences or between paragraphs. He makes a note to pull thesestudents aside for a special lesson on transition phrases.
The classroom assessment....
Ben has completed his unit and feels his students are ready totry their hand at writing their animal reports. He gives theclass a prompt (see below), reads it over with them, answersquestions, and then tells them they will have two classperiods to write their first draft.
Assignment
Write a report on the animal you have been learningabout. Your report should have at least three para-graphs. You do not need to use all the facts that youfound. Pick the ones you think are most interesting toshare. Your grade will depend on how well you:
provide information about your animal and organize it
into paragraphs;
help your reader understand information about your
animal by showing, not just telling; andhelp your reader understand what you have to say by
using correct spelling, punctuation, and indentation of
paragraphs.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
© 2002 WestEd ®All rights reserved. Permission to copyright notice included is hereby granted.t..
The students are told that they should work by themselves asmuch as possible, but that they can ask for help from afriend or from the teacher if necessary. They are free to useany resources in the room for assistance, including thedictionary or their initial research materials. Ben plans tonote the type of assistance requested by students. In eachcase, he will ask himself whether the request indicates a lackof understanding or confidence, or whether it simplyindicates interest in gathering ideas from others.
At the close of the second day, Ben collects the papers fromthe entire class.
© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
90
Tea
chin
g E
xem
plar
s
Pap
er A
- B
ottle
nose
Dol
phin
s
Its h
abita
t is
salt
wat
er. D
olph
ins
are
foun
d in
coas
tal w
ater
s ar
ound
the
wor
ld. T
hey
eat i
nsho
refis
h lik
e ca
pelin
, anc
hovy
, sal
mon
, and
shr
imp.
Dol
-ph
ins
can
eat 6
feet
und
er w
ater
and
can
sta
y do
wn
for
15 m
inut
es. S
omet
imes
dol
phin
s ge
t sic
k fr
ompo
llutio
n.
Dol
phin
s ca
n liv
e up
to 5
0 ye
ars.
Its
coat
issm
ooth
and
like
rub
ber.
A d
olph
in is
a m
amm
al. D
ol-
phin
s ea
t up
to fo
ur p
ound
of f
ish
a da
y.
Whe
n do
lphi
ns s
leep
, the
fem
ale
slee
ps o
n to
p of
the
wat
er a
nd th
e m
ale
slee
ps o
n th
e bo
ttom
. Whe
nth
e m
ale
need
s ai
r, it
goe
s up
to th
e to
p th
e w
ater
toge
t it a
nd th
en it
goe
s ba
ck d
own.
Som
e pe
ople
let b
allo
on g
o an
d th
ey g
o in
to th
eoc
ean.
Dol
phin
s th
ink
it is
food
and
eat
it a
nd c
an d
ie.
Oth
er p
ollu
tion
like
gas
and
soda
can
s ca
n hu
rt d
ol-
phin
s. W
hen
a do
lphi
n is
sic
k it
crie
s to
get
hel
p fr
omot
her
dolp
hins
who
try
to h
elp
it to
the
top
so it
can
brea
the.
We
can
help
dol
phin
s by
not
pol
lutin
g th
eoc
ean.
Pap
er B
- H
orse
s
I cho
se h
orse
s be
caus
e I l
ike
to r
ide
them
. Ial
so li
ke to
pet
them
. Hor
ses
are
very
nic
e an
d th
eylik
e to
be
pette
d to
o. T
hey
have
long
hai
r on
thei
rne
ck a
nd ta
il. T
he h
air
dow
n th
eir
neck
is c
alle
d a
man
e. It
is fu
n to
bru
sh th
eir
man
e an
d ta
il.
Hor
ses
are
very
fun
to r
ide.
At t
he c
amp
I go
toev
eryb
ody
gets
to h
ave
hors
e ba
ck r
idin
g le
sson
s.W
hen
you
ride
a ho
rse
you
need
to p
ut a
sad
dle
on it
sba
ck. S
ome
peop
le r
ide
bare
bac
k bu
t onl
y if
they
are
real
ly g
ood.
Hor
ses
also
wea
r sh
oes
on th
eir
feet
.P
eopl
e pu
t sho
es o
n th
eir
feet
so
thei
r fe
et w
ont g
etso
re w
hen
they
wal
k an
d ru
n.
Hor
ses
eat m
any
diffe
rent
thin
gs. H
orse
s ea
tha
y, g
rass
, bar
ley
and
oats
. Oat
mea
l is
thei
r fa
vorit
efo
od b
ecau
se it
giv
es th
em a
lot o
f ene
rgy.
The
y al
solo
ve c
arro
ts, a
pple
s, m
olas
ses
and
suga
r cu
bes.
Som
e-tim
es th
eir
owne
rs w
ill g
ive
them
a b
lock
of s
alt t
om
ake
them
thirs
ty s
o th
ey w
ill d
rink
enou
gh w
ater
.
Mos
t hor
ses
live
on fa
rms
or r
anch
es, b
ut s
ome
hors
es a
re w
ild. W
ild h
orse
s liv
e on
flat
gra
ssla
nds
whe
re th
ey g
raze
and
they
are
abl
e to
sur
vive
har
dw
eath
er. T
here
are
not
ver
y m
any
wild
hor
ses
any-
mor
e be
caus
e m
ost o
f the
m h
ave
been
trai
ned
bype
ople
.
Prerequisite LearningExperiences
Distinguish fiction andnonfictionRead several examples
of nonfiction/reports
Unit Plan Report of Information
AssessmentStudents will independently
write a multi-paragraph reporton animals using informationgathered from various text andother resources
Standards to be AssessedCreate a single paragraph
Develop a topic sentenceInclude simple facts and
supporting detailsWrite descriptions that useconcrete sensory details topresent and supportunified impressions ofpeople, places, or things
Indent paragraphs, use
appropriate punctuationand capitalization of simple
sentences
Standards to be PracticedDistinguish common forms
of literature (e.g., fiction,nonfiction)Use titles, tables ofcontents, chapter headings,
glossaries, and indexes to
locate information in textDemonstrate comprehension
by answering questions fromtext
Criteria for Success
Gather facts from at leastone source
Organize writing inparagraphs/topic sentences
Use sensory details
to describe
Use appropriate conventions
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Requisite Opportunitiesto Learn
Lessons and Practice:
Identifying sources of information
Using structural features of text,
titles, subtitles, index, etc.
Identifying relevant types of
information about animals
Concept of paragraph/
Purpose for reader
Identifying topic sentences
Grouping sentences on same
topic
Ordering sentences and
paragraphs
Composing topic sentences to
indicate main idea and transitions
for reader
Identifying descriptive words
Writing "showing" not "telling"
sentences
Norms for indentationPunctuation/capitalization of
simple sentences
Sentence construction
© 2002 WestEd All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
CI 9
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Exe
rcis
e an
d H
omew
ork
Org
aniz
ing
Sen
tenc
es In
to P
arag
raph
s
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Org
aniz
ing
Sen
tenc
es in
to P
arag
raph
s an
d W
ritin
ga
Top
ic S
ente
nce
1. R
ead
each
of y
our
sent
ence
str
ips
and
lay
them
out
so
that
you
can
see
them
all
at o
ne ti
me.
2. P
ut y
our
sent
ence
str
ips
into
gro
ups
by to
pic.
All
fact
sab
out w
hat y
our
anim
al e
ats,
for
exam
ple,
sho
uld
be in
one
grou
p. A
ll fa
cts
abou
t wha
t you
r an
imal
look
s lik
e sh
ould
be
in a
noth
er g
roup
.
3. R
ead
the
sent
ence
s in
one
gro
up. W
hat i
s th
e m
ain
idea
of
thes
e se
nten
ces?
Wha
t sen
tenc
e ca
n yo
u pu
t in
fron
t of
thes
e se
nten
ces
to te
ll w
hat t
hey
are
all a
bout
? W
rite
your
mai
n id
ea s
ente
nce
on a
sen
tenc
e st
rip u
sing
a r
ed m
arke
r.C
lip a
ll th
e se
nten
ces
on th
at to
pic
toge
ther
with
the
mai
nid
ea o
n to
p or
at t
he e
nd o
f you
r se
t.
4. If
you
hav
e fa
cts
that
don
't fit
in a
ny g
roup
, you
hav
e a
choi
ce to
mak
e.M
aybe
they
sta
nd a
lone
as
thei
r ow
n pa
ragr
aph.
May
be y
ou w
ill w
ant t
o w
rite
one
or tw
o m
ore
fact
s on
that
topi
c to
go
with
them
.Y
ou m
ight
dec
ide
not t
o us
e th
em in
you
r re
port
.
5. T
ake
one
of th
e pa
ragr
aphs
you
will
use
in y
our
repo
rt a
ndw
rite
it on
a s
epar
ate
piec
e of
pap
er. T
urn
the
pape
r in
at
the
end
of th
e w
ritin
g pe
riod.
Hom
ewor
kO
rgan
izin
g S
ente
nces
into
Par
agra
phs
and
Writ
ing
a T
opic
Sen
tenc
e
1. W
hich
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow te
lls th
e m
ain
idea
of t
hepa
ragr
aph?
Hou
ses
can
be b
uilt
with
man
y di
ffere
nt ty
pes
of m
ater
ials
.S
ome
hous
es a
re b
uilt
with
bric
ks a
nd s
ome
are
built
with
cem
ent.
In th
e ol
den
days
, hou
ses
wer
e bu
ilt w
ith lo
gs.
The
se w
ere
calle
d lo
g ca
bins
. Hou
ses
can
be b
uilt
with
man
ydi
ffere
nt ty
pes
of m
ater
ials
. In
som
e co
untr
ies,
peo
ple
use
mud
to m
ake
thei
r ho
mes
. Igl
oos,
whi
ch a
re o
nly
in v
ery
cold
pla
ces,
are
hou
ses
that
are
mad
e of
ice.
A. I
n th
e ol
den
days
, hou
ses
wer
e bu
ilt w
ith lo
gs.
B. H
ouse
s ca
n be
bui
lt w
ith m
any
diffe
rent
type
s of
mat
eria
ls.
C. S
ome
hous
es a
re b
uilt
with
bric
ks a
nd s
ome
are
built
with
cem
ent.
2. W
hich
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow d
oes
not s
eem
to b
elon
g in
the
para
grap
h? W
hy?
The
Wrig
ht b
roth
ers
inve
nted
the
airp
lane
in 1
903.
Bac
kth
en, a
irpla
nes
used
pro
pelle
rs. T
oday
, airp
lane
s us
e je
ten
gine
s. A
irpla
nes
are
also
muc
h fa
ster
toda
y th
an th
ey u
sed
to b
e. T
he fi
rst t
hing
you
may
not
ice
abou
t a p
lane
is th
ew
ings
that
stic
k ou
t on
eith
er s
ide
of it
s lo
ng b
ody.
Peo
ple
can
trav
el a
roun
d th
e w
orld
in o
nly
a fe
w h
ours
. Airp
lane
sha
ve im
prov
ed a
lot s
ince
they
wer
e fir
st in
vent
ed.
A. A
irpla
nes
have
impr
oved
a lo
t sin
ce th
ey w
ere
first
inve
nted
.B
. The
Wrig
ht b
roth
ers
inve
nted
the
airp
lane
in 1
903.
C. T
he fi
rst t
hing
you
may
not
ice
abou
t a p
lane
is th
ew
ings
that
stic
k ou
t on
eith
er s
ide
of it
s lo
ng b
ody.
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Exe
rcis
e an
d H
omew
ork
Sho
win
g, N
ot T
ellin
g
Cla
ssro
om P
ract
ice
Sho
win
g, N
ot T
ellin
g
Bel
ow y
ou a
re g
iven
thre
e ex
ampl
es o
f sen
tenc
es th
at "
show
,no
t jus
t tel
l" ab
out a
topi
c. P
ract
ice
writ
ing
"sho
w, n
ot ju
stte
ll" s
ente
nces
for
each
of t
he s
ente
nces
bel
ow. S
omet
imes
whe
n yo
u ex
plai
n so
met
hing
by
"sho
win
g" it
in w
ords
, you
will
wan
t to
writ
e m
ore
than
one
sen
tenc
e.
Exa
mpl
e A
:T
ell:
Bird
s ca
n be
ver
y no
isy.
Sho
w: S
omet
imes
a b
ird w
ill s
quaw
k fo
r ho
urs
with
out t
akin
g a
brea
k.
Exa
mpl
e B
:T
ell:
The
tree
was
tall.
Sho
w: T
he to
p of
the
tree
rea
ched
the
four
th s
tory
win
dow
on th
e bu
ildin
g ne
xt d
oor.
Exa
mpl
e C
:T
ell:
The
witc
h w
as u
gly.
Sho
w: T
he w
itch'
s fa
ce w
as w
rinkl
ed. H
e ha
d on
e re
d ey
e an
dw
arts
all
over
his
nos
e.
Pra
ctic
e A
:T
ell:
The
pup
py w
as c
ute.
Sho
w:
Pra
ctic
e B
:T
ell:
Sam
anth
a is
mea
n.S
how
:
Pra
ctic
e C
:T
ell:
Che
etah
s ru
n ve
ry fa
st.
Sho
w:
Pra
ctic
e D
:T
ell:
Tur
tles
mov
e ve
ry s
low
ly.
Sho
w:
Hom
ewor
kS
how
ing,
Not
Tel
ling
Mr.
Kel
ly s
lam
med
his
fist
on
the
tabl
e an
d sc
ream
ed u
ntil
his
face
got
red
.
1. T
he s
ente
nce
abov
e sh
ows
that
:A
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
bore
d.B
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
angr
y.C
. Mr.
Kel
ly w
as p
roba
bly
telli
ng a
joke
.
The
prin
cess
had
hun
dred
s of
bea
utifu
l dre
sses
and
lots
of je
wel
s.
2. T
he s
ente
nce
abov
e sh
ows
that
:A
. The
prin
cess
was
pro
babl
y ric
h.B
. The
prin
cess
was
pro
babl
y yo
ung.
C. T
he p
rince
ss w
as p
roba
bly
good
at p
layi
ng te
nnis
.
Whi
ch o
f the
sen
tenc
es b
elow
are
the
best
exa
mpl
es o
fse
nten
ces
that
sho
w th
at:
3. E
leph
ants
are
big
ani
mal
s.A
. Ele
phan
ts e
at g
rass
and
hay
.B
. Ele
phan
ts w
alk
toge
ther
in p
acks
.C
. Ele
phan
ts s
tand
twel
ve fe
et ta
ll an
d ca
n w
eigh
mor
e th
ana
ton!
4. S
ea o
tters
use
tool
s.A
. Sea
otte
rs li
e on
thei
r ba
cks
and
crac
k sh
ells
ope
n by
poun
ding
a r
ock
agai
nst t
he s
hell
whi
le it
res
ts o
n th
eir
ches
t.B
. Sea
otte
rs s
wim
in th
e co
ol w
ater
nea
r th
e co
ast.
C. S
ea o
tters
are
ver
y pl
ayfu
l.
Pra
ctic
e:W
rite
one
of th
e fa
cts
you
colle
cted
abo
ut y
our
anim
al b
elow
.
Und
erne
ath
that
sen
tenc
e, w
rite
anot
her
sent
ence
(or
mor
e)th
at h
elps
you
r re
ader
"se
e" w
hat y
ou m
ean
usin
g w
ords
that
pain
t a b
ette
r pi
ctur
e of
the
fact
you
hav
e ch
osen
.
INSTRUCTIONAL VIGNETTE: MEG TIPPLE
XacXin7 Cievend graders &Ilse gircenfars
As the students in Meg Tipple's seventh-grade math classenter the classroom, they note the "sponge" assignmentwritten on the board, get out their math notebooks, andbegin writing to the prompt: "Write down everything youcan say about 30%." After quickly taking roll, Meg circulatesaround the room, noting the terminology students use intheir quick-writes, and then she calls for students' attention.
As part of our focus this quarter on being informed consum-ers, you have compared rates and unit prices to investigateadvertising claims, and you have used ratios and proportionsto plan a main course and an appetizer for a large dinnercelebration. Today, we are beginning a unit on percentages.(A copy of Meg's unit plan is included at the end of thisvignette. The vignette covers section 3 of the unit plan.) Megmoves to a chart on the wall labeled, "What math is involvedin being an educated consumer?" and adds the word "per-cents" to the chart.
At the end of this part of the unit, you will show what youhave learned by planning an athletic banquet within a setbudget. You will have to make decisions about planning amenu, selecting entertainment, and purchasing awards,decorations, and gifts for the coaches. During the unit, youwill have lots of opportunities to work together, but each ofyou will need to plan the awards banquet on your own. So itis important for you to take responsibility for your ownlearning by asking questions as we go along when there issomething you don't understand.
She shows students a chart listing the criteria on which theirathletic awards banquet project will be judged. You will need to:
correctly use fractional benchmarks to estimatepercents;use counting and rounding to estimate percents;accurately analyze data represented in a circle graph;correctly calculate savings in a percent-off sale;make a plan that is within your budget; andprecisely construct a circle graph to representpercents.
95© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
Next, she begins a class discussion about percents asking:What is a percent?Where have you seen percents used in everyday situations?
How do percents relate to fractions? Decimals?How many students would make up 100% of your mathclass? 50%? 25%?
Students share their ideas aloud in the large group and,though many of them struggle to make their ideas clear, Megis confident that they are familiar with the basic concepts theyneed to proceed with the unit.
She gives the students a worksheet and has students work inpairs to estimate which answer best completes each statement.After giving them time to work together on the sevenworksheet problems, she has them answer questions A and B
independently.
Select one of the estimates on the right to fill in each of thesesentences: In our math class
1. of the -fewer than 10%students are left-handed. -fewer than 50%
2. of the -more than 50%students have brown hair. -at least 90%
3. of the -about 25%students like pizza. -about 50%
4. of the -about 75%students are wearing -100%
sneakers today.
5. of the A. How did you decide whichstudents are 12 years old. percentage to use with each
6. of the statement?students have summerbirthdays. B. How could you check your
7. of theestimates?
students like football.
While students work in pairs, Meg circulates, asking studentsquestions about their estimates and the strategies they usedto come up with those estimates. During this time, she makesnotes on a class list about students' understanding ofthe meaning of percents, their familiarity with estimating
BEST COPY AVAILABLE96
© 2002 WestEd 6) All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
percents, and their understanding of the relationship amongdecimals, fractions, and percents.
Meg notices that as students try to select the percent thatmakes each statement true, some students make commentslike "not very many so let's pick 10%," or "most students sowhat's the largest percent," or "about half and half" as theyestimate the number of students and match it to a percentagestatement. Others guess with no apparent strategy.
As a result of these observations, Meg decides to spend a fewminutes reviewing with the class the relationship of fractionalparts to percents and helping them see how to use familiarbenchmarks like 25%, 50%, and 75% to make estimates.She tells students that estimating a percent is much the sameas estimating a fractional part of something. She holds upfraction circles representing 1/5, 1/3, 3/8, etc. and asksstudents to name the fraction and then determine whetherthe fraction represents a percent nearer to 25%, 50%, 75%,or 100% of the whole. As students offer correct responses,she asks them to explain how they made their estimate andthen repeats their explanation in her own words to providethe class with models of good problem solving. In each case,she points out how the students used the familiar bench-marks of 25%, 50%, or 75% to make their estimate.
Next, Meg gives each student a few pieces of graph paper.She asks them to outline a 10 x 10 box and shows them howto demonstrate 1/4 = 25 squares or 25% of the 100 squares.She then points to the homework assignment on the boardand tells students to copy it into their notebooks.
Homework:
On the graph paper you have been given, fill in the percent-
ages and illustrate the following fraction and percentequivalents: 1/2 = 50%, 3/4 = %, 1 whole = %, and
2/5 = %.
Estimate the percentage that would be equivalent to:7/8, 2/3, and 1/6 and write an explanation of how youmade your estimate for each.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
97© 2002 WestEd ®All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
The second day....
Students enter the classroom and begin writing a response to
the question written on the board: A store advertised,"Best Sale Ever! 10% discount on all items!" Is this a goodsale? Why or why not? While students are writing, Meglooks through the homework that students placed in thebasket by the door, quickly eyeballing them to check on thework of a few students who seemed to have had difficulty in
yesterday's class.
Meg has students quickly share their answers to the writingprompt with a partner. She then randomly picks two namesfrom the class name container (names written on Popsiclesticks) and asks those two students to share their discussionaloud with the class. She asks the rest of the class to agree,disagree, or add to the comments shared.
Meg begins today's lesson by telling the class that later in theperiod they will be given some information about a footballteam and what percent of its $20,000 budget it has spent oncertain items. From that information, students will be askedto estimate approximately how much money the team spenton each item. She reminds them that in this case they will
not be calculating to get an exact figure, but instead, estimat-
ing in their heads.
Today we will continue our work with fractional benchmarksfamiliar fractions like 1/2 or 50% and 1/4 or 25% to
estimate percentages that are close to those benchmarks. As
she says this, she points to the chart listing the criteria thatwill be used to judge the final project. This is one of the skillsyou will need to know in order to plan your banquet.
As we do this, you can think about fractional parts and use25%, 50%, and 75% as benchmarks for checking whetheryour estimate is reasonable. In your homework, you demon-
strated percents using a box divided into 100 squares. Eachsquare represented 1/100 or 1% of the whole. Look at thenumber line on the board. Let's estimate 23% of 400.
98© 2002 WestEd
° All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
Meg demonstrates thinking aloud. In this case, 400 is the whole.
Which benchmark percent is 23% closest to? (25%) We can use
that benchmark, 25% or 1/4, to mentally figure out the amount.
What is 1/4 or 25% of 400? One quarter of 400 is 100, so 23%
of 400 is a little less than 100. When we estimate, we don't need
to say exactly how much less.
After demonstrating how she solved this problem for thewhole class, Meg passes out a worksheet that includes thefollowing problems: What is 25% of 200? What is 55% of400? What is 76% of 400? What is 75% of 200? She encour-ages the students to work in pairs to figure out the answers.After giving them time to work, she calls on pairs to sharetheir responses with the whole class.
As answers are shared, a few students seem to be confused orto forget the size of the "whole." For instance, Bill says that25% of 200 is 25. Meg responds that 25 would be correct ifthe number or the whole set was 100 as it was when theyfound 25% of the 100-square graph paper box, but that nowthe whole set was 200. She prompted with the followingquestions: How many in the whole? (200) Twenty-five percentis closest to what fraction? (1/4) What is 1/4 of 200? (50)What is 25% of 200? (50) She asks if anyone else thoughtabout this a different way, and one student says she figuredthat if 25% of 100 is 25, then 2 times 100 is 200, and so2 times 25 would make 50. Meg has students do a few moreexamples until confusions like Bill's seem to be cleared up.
Next, Meg distributes Worksheet A (included at the end ofthis vignette), and students independently begin work on it.Meg works with two students who seem to have troublegetting started, prompting them with questions to get themgoing (e.g., what benchmark percent is that closest to: 25%,50%...?). After students complete the worksheet, Meg hasthem process what they have learned by asking them to share
ideas about these questions:What methods did you use to estimate the percentage
increase in dollar amounts?
How did you decide if your estimates are reasonable?
99© 2002 WestEd e All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
At the end of the class period, Meg collects the worksheetand students copy the homework assignment.
Homework:
There is a picture of an American Flag on page 114 in your
math book. Estimate the percentage of the flag that is made
of stripes and the percentage that has stars in the blue area.Plan a way to verify your estimates. Be prepared to discuss
your answers at the beginning of the period tomorrow.
The third day....
Pairs share homework solutions and strategies with eachother.
Quick-Write: How would you estimate 3% of 445?
After students share ideas, Meg begins: Sometimes, like inthe problem we just worked on, the percentage we are tryingto estimate is not very close to any of the benchmarks we
worked on yesterday. To estimate these, you will want to use
counting and rounding. As she says this, she again points tothe chart of criteria for the final project. Meg presents a minilesson on counting and rounding, and then reviews thisstrategy by sharing aloud a strategy for solving the problemshe gave in the quick-write. As she shares her thinking aloud,she writes these key phrases on the board:
3% means $3 for every $100And, therefore, $1.50 for every $50To find 3% of $445, count the number of $100s thatyou need: 4
Then you have $45 left over, which can be rounded to
$50
So 3% of $445 is about 4($3) + $1.50, which equals
$13.50
Meg asks students to estimate and discuss their strategies forfiguring 6% of 625 and then 8% of 650. She has them sharetheir thinking aloud, and, as they do, she writes out the stepson the board so students have a model of how to record theirmental math.
BEST COPY AVAILARI. F100
© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
Next, she distributes Worksheet B (included at the end ofthis vignette), and students independently complete theactivity. As they do that, Meg circulates, prompting students,asking questions to push their thinking, asking them todescribe the strategy they used, clearing up misunderstand-ings, and looking at the work they are producing to makesure that each student is being successful. As she circulates,she makes notes for use in planning the next day's lesson.
Students who have finished their worksheet copy the home-work assignment into their notebooks and begin theirhomework.
When the rest of the class is finished with the worksheet,Meg has the students share their estimates for expenses, theamount the district will pay, and the amount for which fundsmust be raised. As students share, Meg asks for alternativeresponses and then helps students understand why there arediscrepancies by asking them to describe the mental math
strategies they used for estimating.
Minutes before the dismissal bell rings, Meg says, Thehomework you have tonight will give you a chance to practice
the skill of counting and rounding on your own. Don't forgetto get the assignment down! (The homework is included at
the end of this vignette. )
Over the next several days....
Meg teaches lessons on the skills students will need tocomplete their final project, including (see Meg's unit plan at
the end of this vignette):converting among fractions, decimals, and percents;
interpreting data in a circle graph;
constructing a circle graph;finding discounts and resulting sale prices;
using calculators to find sale prices;
calculating savings in a percent-off sale;
determining savings with discount coupons; and
planning a budget.
101© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
Each day Meg begins with a reminder of how the lesson andfollow-up work will help students plan the athletic banquetwithin a set budget, referring to the criteria chart she sharedon the first day of the unit. Whenever possible, she points outmodels of the quality work she will be looking for.
After each lesson, students are given practice exercises to work
on alone or in small groups. Before asking students to startwork, Meg models similar problems by showing examples or
thinking aloud as she works through an exercise. As studentswork, Meg circulates around the room to clarify instructions,coach individual students, clear up misunderstandings, andlook at the work they are producing to make sure that eachstudent is being successful. When needed, she stops to reteacha concept or makes notes for use in planning the next day'slesson. As necessary, she pulls together small groups of
students having similar difficulties to clear up misconceptions.
Unit review and self-assessment....
Meg has completed the unit and believes that her studentsare just about ready for the assessment. She summarizes themajor areas of study over the past two to three weeks andtells students that they are now going to get ready to plan theathletic banquet.
When you plan your athletic banquet tomorrow, you aregoing to be given $2,500 to spend. You will know the num-ber of students and coaches who will attend and the costs for
food, entertainment, trophies, and decorations. You are goingto have to choose from among lots of different foods, types ofawards, decorations, entertainment, and gifts and staywithin your budget. When you have decided what you willbuy and how much you will spend on each, then you willmake a circle graph to illustrate how your money was spent.*As Meg explains the final project, she shows the prompt onan overhead and explains that students will each get a copyat the start of class the next day. (See Final Unit Assessmentat the end of the vignette.)
* Based on the curriculum unit, Buyer Beware, Math Scape Seeing
and Thinking Mathematically, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, 1998.
102© 2002 WestEd ® All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
She points out the criteria chart for a high-level response tothis assignment and, again, reviews the criteria. For eachcriterion, she offers an example or shows a model from aprevious lesson (e.g., a good budget plan, circle graph).As she shares the model, she reminds the students of thespecific characteristics that she will be looking for in theirwork. For example, she explains: When you write up yourbudget plan, you will need to be sure that you purchaseeverything required for the banquet and that your purchasesadd up to a figure close to, but not a penny over, your allottedbudget.
So, now before you get the assignment for your final project,
I want to give you some time to think about whether you areready, and if not, what other help you may need. I want youto look back over your portfolio of work from this unit andthink about the skills and criteria I have just reviewed. Canyou do all these? If not, this is your chance to get yourselfready for the final project.
You guys know the procedure for convening a study group,how to sign up for a conference with me if you need my helpwith something, and what is expected if you plan to work onyour own.
She gives students a few minutes to review their portfolioand then does a rapid roll call, asking each student to reportout how he will be using this unit review period.
The final project begins....
Meg starts the class by reviewing for the last time the criteriaon which the students' work will be judged, and then givesstudents the assignment, saying, This project puts togetherall of the skills we have been working on for the last two
weeks.
103© 2002 WestEd
eAll rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
You will have two class periods to finish this task. When youare finished, I want you to take some time before you turnin your work to complete the self-assessment sheet andattach it to your project. It will ask you to commenton how you think you did in relation to each of the criteriaI just went over. Before you go home tonight, I will collectyour work in progress. I'll return it to you tomorrow, so thatyou can continue your work.
When you get your papers back, I will return them with the"Teacher Comments" page attached. (The teacher commentsare included at the end of this vignette.) It will explain howyou did on each of these criteria. Then, you will have adecision to make about whether you want to revise yourproject for additional credit.
Your work this last couple of weeks has shown me you are
ready for this project. I know you'll do great work!
104© 2002 WestEd °All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
Final Unit AssessmentThe Informed Consumer: Percentages Unit*
Planning an Athletic Banquet on a BudgetYou have been given $2,500 to plan the athletic banquet. The money was donated for the banquet and that's all it
can be used for, so you need to spend close to $2,500. You can't spend more than this.
Athletic Banquet Attendance
Sport Students Coaches
Field Hockey 20 2
Football 50 3
Soccer 30 2
Tennis 16 2
Basketball 20 2
Volleyball 12 1
Cross-country 12 1
Swimming 8 I
Lacrosse 18 2
I. Use the Athletic Banquet Price List to help you plan your choices for food, entertainment, awards, decora-tions, and gifts for the coaches.
2. When you have figured out how much you will spend for each category, write your plan for what you will
be doing for each of the following: food, entertainment, awards, decorations, and gifts for the coaches.3. Make a chart to record your total expenses in each category.4. Write down the total amount you will spend on the banquet. Tell how much money, if any, you will have
left over from the $2,500 you were given to spend.
Display Your Budget Data in a Circle GraphYou need to present the information in your banquet plan to the athletic advisory committee. Make a circle graphfor the presentation.
Use the circle on the handout, How To Construct a Circle Graph.Use percentages to label each sector of your circle graph.Make sure your sectors are clearly labeled and that the graph has a title.
Athletic Banquet Price ListGlordanno's by the Bay
Catering MenuBroiled tenderloin $5.75
Hot turkey sandwichSpaghetti with meatballsFried fantail shrimp
Baked vegetable lasagna
Enchiladas nortenas
Guadalajara burritoVegetable burrito
$5.25
$5.10$6.25
$5.50$6.50$5.40$6.10
EntertainmentThe Rocksters $200 per hour
25% surcharge over 2 hours
Sammy the DJ $100 per hour
50% surcharge per hour for music
of your choice
Alan's Awards ShopTrophies $5.95
25% discount on all orders
over 50
Plaques $4.95
1/3 off on all orders over 10
Party DecorationsOutlet
Streamers $1.99 per package
Balloons $2.99 per package
Confetti $3.49 per package
15% off on orders over 10 packages
The Coaches' AthleticGift Shop
Award Plaques $19.95 each
10% off on orders over $100
Desk Plates $24.95 each
2.5% off on orders over 10
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
* Based on the curriculum unit, Buyer Beware, Math Scape Seeing and Thinking Mathematically, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, 1998.
105© 2002 WestEd ®All rights reserved. Permission to reproduce with WestEd copyright notice included is hereby granted.
O O
Num
ber
Sens
e1.
0St
uden
ts k
now
the
prop
ertie
s of
, and
com
pute
with
, rat
iona
l num
bers
exp
ress
ed in
a v
arie
ty o
f fo
rms:
1.3
Con
vert
fra
ctio
ns to
dec
imal
s an
d pe
rcen
ts a
nd u
se th
ese
repr
esen
tatio
ns in
est
imat
ions
, com
puta
tions
, and
app
licat
ions
.1.
7So
lve
prob
lem
s th
at in
volv
e di
scou
nts,
mar
kups
, com
mis
sion
s, a
nd p
rofi
t, an
d co
mpu
te s
impl
e an
d co
mpo
und
inte
rest
.
0
Uni
t Pla
nG
rade
Sev
en
Inst
ruct
iona
l The
me
The
Info
rmed
Con
sum
er*
Key
Sta
ndar
ds
Mat
hem
atic
al R
easo
ning
2.0
Stud
ents
use
str
ateg
ies,
ski
lls, a
nd c
once
pts
in f
indi
ng s
olut
ions
:2.
1U
se e
stim
atio
n to
ver
ify
the
reas
onab
lene
ss o
f ca
lcul
ated
res
ults
.2.
2A
pply
str
ateg
ies
and
resu
lts f
rom
sim
pler
pro
blem
s to
mor
e co
mpl
ex p
robl
ems.
2.5
Use
a v
arie
ty o
f m
etho
ds, s
uch
as w
ords
, num
bers
, sym
bols
, cha
rts,
gra
phs,
tabl
es, d
iagr
ams,
and
mod
els,
to e
xpla
in m
athe
mat
ical
rea
soni
ng.
2.6
Exp
ress
the
solu
tion
clea
rly
and
logi
cally
by
usin
g th
e ap
prop
riat
e m
athe
mat
ical
not
atio
n an
d te
rms
and
clea
r la
ngua
ge; s
uppo
rt s
olut
ions
with
evi
denc
e in
bot
h ve
rbal
and
sym
bolic
wor
k.
3.0
Stud
ents
det
erm
ine
a so
lutio
n is
com
plet
e an
d m
ove
beyo
nd a
par
ticul
ar p
robl
em b
y ge
nera
lizin
g to
oth
er s
olut
ions
:
3.2
Not
e th
e m
etho
d of
der
ivin
g th
e so
lutio
n an
d de
mon
stra
te a
con
cept
ual u
nder
stan
ding
of
the
deri
vatio
n by
sol
ving
sim
ilar
prob
lem
s.3.
3D
evel
op g
ener
aliz
atio
ns o
f th
e re
sults
obt
aine
d an
d th
e s
rate
gies
use
d an
d ap
ply
them
to n
ew p
robl
em s
ituat
ions
.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d ab
out u
nit p
rice
to ta
keon
the
role
of
inve
stig
ativ
e re
port
er to
res
earc
h cl
aim
s m
ade
bya
sand
wic
h ba
r ab
out t
he u
nit p
rice
s of
thei
r sa
ndw
iche
s.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d ab
out r
atio
and
prop
ortio
n to
pla
n fo
r an
inte
rnat
iona
l din
ner.
The
y se
t up
and
solv
e pr
opor
tions
usi
ng e
qual
rat
ios
or c
ross
pro
duct
s to
incr
ease
a d
inne
r re
cipe
, and
they
use
pro
port
ions
to d
ecid
e th
eco
sts
of a
ppet
izer
s fo
r th
e bu
ffet
.
Ass
essm
ent:
Stud
ents
use
wha
t the
y ha
ve le
arne
d to
pla
n an
ath
letic
banq
uet.T
hey
are
give
n a
set a
mou
nt o
f m
oney
and
mus
t kee
pa
budg
et to
kee
p tr
ack
of m
onet
ary
expe
nditu
res.
The
y m
ake
deci
sion
s on
pla
nnin
g a
men
u, s
elec
ting
ente
rtai
nmen
t, an
dpu
rcha
sing
aw
ards
, dec
orat
ions
, and
gif
ts f
or th
e co
ache
s.T
hey
mus
t als
o di
spla
y th
eir
budg
et in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph.
SEC
TIO
N O
NE
: RA
TE
SSE
CT
ION
TW
O: R
AT
IOS
AN
D P
RO
POR
TIO
NS
SEC
TIO
N T
HR
EE
:PE
RC
EN
TS
Less
on C
onte
nt a
nd S
kills
Less
on C
onte
nt a
nd S
kills
Less
on C
onte
nt a
nd S
kills
Cal
cula
te th
e un
it pr
ice
of a
n ite
m.
Set u
p ra
tios
to c
ompa
re it
ems.
Use
ben
chm
arks
to e
stim
ate
perc
ents
.
Det
erm
ine
whi
ch p
acka
ge s
ize
is th
e be
tter
buy.
Use
rat
io ta
bles
to f
ind
equa
l rat
ios.
Est
imat
e pe
rcen
ts u
sing
men
tal m
ath.
Use
wei
ght u
nits
to c
ompa
re th
e pr
ice
of d
iffe
rent
item
s.W
rite
rat
ios
as s
impl
ifie
d fr
actio
ns.
Use
cou
ntin
g an
d ro
undi
ng to
est
imat
e pe
rcen
ts.
Com
pare
pri
ce p
er o
unce
to d
ecid
e th
e be
tter
buy.
Dec
ide
if tw
o ra
tios
are
equi
vale
nt.
Con
vert
am
ong
frac
tions
, dec
imal
s, a
nd p
erce
nts.
Vis
ualiz
e an
d ca
lcul
ate
unit
pric
es w
ith a
pri
ce g
raph
.U
se r
atio
s to
com
pare
dif
fere
nt p
rodu
cts.
Inte
rpre
t dat
a in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph.
Con
stru
ct a
pri
ce g
raph
fro
m a
list
of
prod
ucts
.U
se c
ross
pro
duct
s an
d eq
uiva
lent
fra
ctio
ns to
com
pare
rat
ios.
Con
stru
ct a
cir
cle
grap
h.
Use
a p
rice
gra
ph to
che
ck u
nit p
rice
cal
cula
tions
.U
se e
qual
rat
ios
to s
olve
a p
ropo
rtio
n.Fi
nd d
isco
unts
and
res
ultin
g sa
le p
rice
s.
Use
a c
alcu
lato
r to
fin
d th
e pr
ice
per
poun
d.U
se c
ross
pro
duct
s to
sol
ve a
pro
port
ion.
Use
cal
cula
tors
to f
ind
sale
pri
ces.
Est
imat
e to
fin
d th
e be
tter
buy.
Dec
ide
if it
is e
asie
r to
use
cro
ss p
rodu
cts
or e
qual
rat
ios
toC
alcu
late
sav
ings
in a
per
cent
-off
sal
e.
Com
pare
uni
t pri
ces
to f
ind
the
bette
r bu
y.so
lve
a pr
opor
tion.
Det
erm
ine
savi
ngs
with
dis
coun
t cou
pons
.
Solv
e un
it pr
ice
prob
lem
s us
ing
a ca
lcul
ator
.Se
t up
and
solv
e a
prop
ortio
n.Pl
an a
bud
get.
Find
and
com
pare
uni
t pri
ces.
Use
cro
ss p
rodu
cts
and/
or e
qual
rat
ios
to s
olve
a p
ropo
rtio
n.D
ispl
ay a
bud
get i
n a
circ
le g
raph
.
Cal
cula
te lo
ng-t
erm
sav
ings
with
the
less
exp
ensi
ve p
rodu
ct.
Use
pro
port
ions
to in
crea
se a
rec
ipe.
Con
stru
ct a
cir
cle
grap
h.
Use
pro
port
ions
to d
ecid
e co
sts.
Solv
e pr
oble
ms
invo
lvin
g pe
rcen
ts a
nd d
isco
unts
.
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
Sam
ple
Wor
kshe
ets/
Tea
cher
Com
men
ts*
Wor
kshe
et A
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Est
imat
e E
xpen
ses
Est
imat
ing
a pe
rcen
t of
som
ethi
ng is
muc
h th
e sa
me
as e
stim
atin
g a
frac
tiona
l par
t of
som
ethi
ng.
Las
t yea
r th
e C
ouga
rs f
ootb
all t
eam
's to
tal e
xpen
ses
wer
e $2
0,00
0. T
he ta
ble
belo
w s
how
s w
hat p
erce
nt o
f th
e bu
dget
was
spe
nt o
n ea
ch e
xpen
se. A
bout
how
muc
h m
oney
was
spe
nt o
n ea
ch it
em?
1.M
ake
a ta
ble
like
the
one
show
n be
low
and
com
plet
e th
e la
stco
lum
n. E
stim
ate
the
cost
of
each
exp
ense
. Use
ben
chm
arks
and
men
tal m
ath
to m
ake
your
est
imat
es. D
o no
t use
pap
er a
nd p
enci
l.
2.T
he te
am s
pent
exa
ctly
$80
0 on
one
exp
ense
. Whi
ch w
as it
? U
sees
timat
ion
to f
igur
e it
out.
3.T
he T
iger
s fo
otba
ll te
am, c
ross
-tow
n ri
vals
, spe
nt 2
6% o
f its
$16,
000
budg
et o
n un
ifor
ms.
Whi
ch te
am s
pent
mor
e on
unif
orm
s? U
se e
stim
atio
n to
fig
ure
it ou
t.
Foot
ball
Tea
m E
xpen
ses
Item
sPe
rcen
tof
Bud
get
Est
imat
edC
ost
Uni
form
s23
%
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
6%
Coa
ch's
Sal
ary
48%
Equ
ipm
ent
11%
Off
icia
ls' F
ees
4%
Tra
iner
's S
alar
y8%
Tot
al E
xpen
ses:
$20,
000
Wor
kshe
et B
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Cou
ntin
g an
d R
ound
ing
A g
irls
' fie
ld h
ocke
y te
am w
ants
to p
lay
in a
tour
nam
ent.
The
sch
ool d
istr
ict
will
pay
onl
y a
cert
ain
perc
enta
ge o
f ea
ch e
xpen
se. T
he te
am m
ust r
aise
the
amou
nt n
ot p
aid
by th
e di
stri
ct.
If y
ou c
an f
ind
50%
, 10%
, and
1%
of
a nu
mbe
r m
enta
lly, y
ou c
an a
lso
estim
ate
som
e ot
her
perc
ents
men
tally
. For
exa
mpl
e, th
ink
of 2
5% a
s ha
lf o
f50
% a
nd 5
% a
s ha
lf o
f 10
%.
Fiel
d H
ocke
y T
eam
Tri
p E
xpen
ses
Exp
ense
Est
imat
edC
ost
Perc
ent D
istr
ict
Will
Pay
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
$700
3%
Mea
ls$6
0012
%
Hot
el$9
254%
Tou
rnam
ent F
ees
$346
22%
Tou
rnam
ent U
nifo
rms
$473
2.5%
1.U
se c
ount
ing
and
roun
ding
to e
stim
ate
the
dolla
r am
ount
the
scho
oldi
stri
ct w
ill p
ay f
or e
ach
expe
nse.
2.E
stim
ate
the
tota
l am
ount
the
dist
rict
will
pay
for
all
the
expe
nses
.3.
Est
imat
e th
e to
tal a
mou
nt o
f m
oney
the
team
will
nee
d to
rai
se.
4.U
se y
our
calc
ulat
or to
fig
ure
out t
he e
xact
am
ount
the
team
will
nee
dto
rai
se f
or e
ach
expe
nse.
Wri
te A
bout
You
r E
stim
ates
Wri
te a
bout
the
estim
ates
you
mad
e fo
r th
e fi
eld
hock
ey te
am e
xpen
ses.
Wha
t str
ateg
ies
did
you
use
to e
stim
ate
the
expe
nses
and
tota
l cos
t?
Wha
t are
som
e w
ays
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er y
our
estim
ate
is r
easo
nabl
e?
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
Sam
ple
Wor
kshe
ets/
Tea
cher
Com
men
ts*
Hom
ewor
k A
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
ES
TIM
AT
ING
PE
RC
EN
TS
App
lyin
g Sk
ills
The
fie
ld h
ocke
y te
am's
tota
l exp
ense
s fo
r la
st y
ear
wer
e $1
0,00
0. E
stim
ate
how
muc
h w
as s
pent
on
each
of
the
expe
nses
list
ed b
elow
. Use
ben
chm
arks
and
men
tal
mat
h to
mak
e yo
ur e
stim
ates
.
Item
Perc
ent
of B
udge
tE
stim
ated
Cos
t
1. U
nifo
rms
22%
2. T
rans
port
atio
n4%
3. C
oach
's S
alar
y12
%
4. E
quip
men
t49
%
5. O
ffic
ials
' Fee
s6%
6. T
rain
er's
Sal
ary
7%
Est
imat
e ea
ch n
umbe
r in
item
s 7-
10. T
hen
use
your
cal
cula
tor
to s
ee h
ow c
lose
you
res
timat
e is
.7.
49%
of
179
8. 2
4% o
f 31
99.
19%
of
354
10. 3
4% o
f 17
511
. Fin
d 7%
of
$400
. 7%
mea
nsfo
r ev
ery
12. F
ind
12%
of
$300
. 12%
mea
nsfo
r ev
ery
Ext
endi
ng C
once
pts
13. T
o es
timat
e 24
% o
f 43
, LeR
on s
ubst
itute
d nu
mbe
rs a
nd f
ound
25%
of
44. H
isan
swer
was
11.
Usi
ng h
is c
alcu
lato
r, h
e fo
und
that
the
exac
t ans
wer
is 1
0.32
. LeR
onco
nclu
ded
that
sub
stitu
ting
num
bers
cau
ses
you
to o
vere
stim
ate.
Do
you
agre
e? I
fno
t, gi
ve a
cou
nter
exam
ple.
14. N
irup
a ca
lls h
ome
from
col
lege
at l
east
onc
e a
wee
k. A
30-
min
ute
phon
e ca
ll co
sts
$10
on w
eekd
ays.
Nir
upa
can
save
20%
if s
he c
alls
on
a w
eeke
nd. H
ow m
uch
mon
eydo
es s
he s
ave
on a
30-
min
ute
call
mad
e on
Sat
urda
y?
Mak
ing
Con
nect
ions
15. L
ook
thro
ugh
new
spap
ers
and
mag
azin
es to
fin
d ar
ticle
s in
volv
ing
perc
ents
.D
esig
n a
colla
ge w
ith th
e ar
ticle
s. W
rite
out
per
cent
s fr
om 1
thro
ugh
100
and
thei
req
uiva
lent
fra
ctio
nal b
ench
mar
ks.
Tea
cher
Com
men
ts
The
Inf
orm
ed C
onsu
mer
: Per
cent
Uni
t
Stud
ent
Peri
odD
ate
Doe
s th
is w
ork
dem
onst
rate
:
Cor
rect
use
of
frac
tiona
l ben
chm
arks
and
cou
ntin
g an
d ro
undi
ng to
estim
ate
perc
ents
?
Acc
urat
e an
alys
is o
f da
ta r
epre
sent
ed in
a c
ircl
e gr
aph?
Cor
rect
cal
cula
tion
of s
avin
gs in
a p
erce
nt-o
ff s
ale?
Eff
ectiv
e us
e of
a b
udge
t to
plan
exp
endi
ture
s?
Prec
ise
cons
truc
tion
of a
cir
cle
grap
h to
rep
rese
nt p
erce
nts?
* B
ased
on
the
curr
icul
um u
nit,
Buy
er B
ewar
e, M
ath
Scap
e Se
eing
and
Thi
nkin
g M
athe
mat
ical
ly, G
lenc
oe/M
cGra
w H
ill, 1
998.
1 :!),!/!1 . .11LJ; 1,1,1.11,ItZ.,
/,-,;:iipfi;oiliy/ .1..e.iit?tist;ii: ° ...".iiiiii.::-....-f'-L....7,--..a.:. :c:..s..-.5 ° Instructional Leaciciship ° bsti-Pritioilizi ..,
10.Str coal Leadership 0 Instructional Leade,..ship 0 :::',5;:i7:c.:;:37.a: '....f;',Ztie'.:5::::.? ° Instructio6a1 .:..,eaclership o
0, .....7..,..r.- ....i.:....c..:..q:. .....-....,:-. i-i.stiiiitiordl ii.:,i.cic-s-iiii) o fev-ruct lona 1 Leade .,11) 0 :i::.,,,7,.^..-,77._,.c':,:37.P2.. _2.,.,c7s::,,.-.3. 0 ,nstructionalT
otation is tile Enemy o improvement--,ctiopai Lt,-fici-si.,;;,,:J.-.1s .... -;: _io..-..l....,;:ar,ilan..c....i-.) ° instructional Leadership , instractional Leadership 0 ..r.51'.7;,:!C'd..1-2.a:
Tship 0 Instiur.floncil L.c.adership Instruction a .-tiot al ea , e cps, ., 1 v. Leadership 0pictioilai Ico.d.,Jisnip 0 iilstiuct;o;ia/ itioikaiarl'artf,:Staiidaildi-.7138'sedctPrattiteihip i0 ..),Lst7zictional Leadership 0 :1
-.*.-.; 0 :.tisih.:L6ia1 1,c2dcrshill 0 Instructional Lead.ership lnstructional Leadership 0 Instructional )
*.;.C.C.-.:7.2.1 ICO_C.t:::;:-.-.? ° Instructional Leadership c Li/stir/alai-la/ Liattership 0 .7.r.,5.iicz.a; 1? 0 Instructional Leadership 0
Ltioildiff.,,Iciti,iship
'rshio h.isiructional Leadership 01::
ictional :1-eadersliip Instiuctional
structional Lcadetship
instructionaT.
;Ship
!Li;o.,-2,1/ilcit!c/Lii.r/iiip
1-ship 0 instructional Leadership Ii
icLonal Leadership Instructional
dstructionai Leadership
instruction.ai
5.1..p
71;tidtil tedfiCiShip 0
%-ship histiuctional Leadership
()nal ,I.cadersHip filstr:!ctio;!e/
instfitctionzl Lcadershii)
o ilstructiona.
C
'ctiOnal leadership 0
shI p 0 Instiuctional leadiTship 0
ictional Leadership Instruciioaal
:-H-3 C Pstruc.Cona'l -teat:el-ship 0
instructiona
If all students are to achieve to high standards,
teachers must be prepared to work in new ways,
from developing shared expectations for student
performance to expanding their repertoire of
strategies and skills. For their part, instructional
leaders must understand the demands.ofstandards-based instruction and foster the
conditions that support it. This new book by
Kate Jamentz of WestEd's Western Assessment
Collaborative is designed to assist principals and
teacher leaders in this all-important effort.
In addition to articulating the specific teaching
skills needed for standards-based instruction, the
book presents two annotated classroom vignettes
illustrating them. It then describes the types of
learning experiences teachers need for acquiring
or refining these skills and explains how
instructional leaders can facilitate such
opportunities. The book includes three tools for
guiding instructional leaders and teachers as they
focus on standards-driven lesson planning or
reflect on the effectiveness of those lessons. It also
includes an unannotated version of each
classroom vignette, for use as an exercise to help
participants internalize a vision of effective
standards--based instruction.
a. .eadrshro o instructional
linstu.cticiila:'. Leacleni.7-iji? 0 I
'al Leadership
p 0 Instructional Leadership 0 t:
nal Leadership 0 Instructional
() Instructional Leadership
teze..e:ship. 0 Instructional
:icd Leacers.fi.i..p. 0 I
iaiLeadeiship 0 ::r.stziaclio17.2`1.
p Instructional Leadership 01:
nal Leadership 0. Instructional 1
° Instructional Leadership
lal Lei..c:le7S!7.i? 0 Instructional
?InsL-nstiori.eli 1-..eacs.'n:lp I
al Leadership 0 7...nstir,:c.:Ecr.L
p 0 Instructional Leadership
nal Leadership 0 Instructional
Instructional Leadership
teafL-czshi.? Instructional
i:nEtni,.ctio.r.221 Leacieli? 0 1
al Leadership 0 instn:czt'.ona:
p ° Instructional Leadership ° If.:
nal Leadership Instructional ,
io Instructional Leadership
Leadership Instructional Leadership 0 17astnIcion:rj,1,..cafer511:-p ° Instructional.
'(ti, .! ° Instructional 'Leadership 0 Instv,!ctional Leadership
:es ° Instructional Leadership 0 instruction(
ictitino7C1.1-b:rJ7A9p Le,Idt,;.ship Instructional LeadershipSan FrancisCd, CA 94107-1242
i.e.,2.o.ership 0 folde,iship :`,2s-nivf.c1Tr:i-iial !nstruction
li.eade!isllip Idsti.ifetio;o1 9
c I r I I ; n 1;7c1:47irtiel:2,4 pd.dr,:'iliih 0 "Tc77'f''7,-' 0 rt çf It r; Oil :1 1
ISBN 0-914409-13-1
78091411409137
90000
I I I
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
Reproduction Basis
This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes ofdocuments from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a
"Specific Document" Release form.
This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission toreproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may bereproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either"Specific Document" or "Blanket").
EFF-089 (1/2003)