Upload
melvin-lowrey
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reproduction on the Ranch
Clay Lents1, Kraig Peel2, George Seidel Jr.1,and Gordon Niswender1
Colorado State University
1Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory2Western Center for Integrated Resource Management
Clay Lents1, Kraig Peel2, George Seidel Jr.1,and Gordon Niswender1
Colorado State University
1Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory2Western Center for Integrated Resource Management
Reproduction on the RanchReproduction on the Ranch
Reproduction on the Ranch
• Reproduction is the most important trait
• Heifer Development and Management
• Reproduction in Mature Cows
• Management of Bulls
• The Future
Example
If we increase calf crop by 5%
300 Cows would yield 15 additional calves
15 calves average 450 pounds at weaning and sold at $.90 would equal $6075 additional income
OR
Cull the 15 open cows
15 cows off the ranch which cost $300/year= $4500 annual savings
Sale of 15 cows at $400=$6000
$10,500/year
Receipts from cull cows only pay for at best, 60% of the cost of replacements
Reproduction on the Ranch
• In General:– Reproductive traits have low heritability
– But, reproductive traits do respond well to changes in management and environment
Heifer Management
• Heifers should conceive by 14 months of age
• Heifers should be in a BCS of 6.5 at calving (genetics, nutrition, environment)
• Strategies to increase pregnancy rates for first calf heifers– Provide extra feed– Match heifers to their environment– Remove calves for 48 hours or early wean
calves (6-8 weeks)
Typical Natural Service Cost Per Calf (ABS)
Bull Purchase Price
$ 1,800 $ 2,000 $ 2,500 $ 3,000
20 cows/year for 3 years
$ 54.60 $ 59.30 $ 71.05 $ 82.81
25 cows/year for 3 years
$ 43.68 $ 47.44 $ 56.84 $ 66.25
30 cows/year for 3 years
$ 36.40 $ 39.53 $ 47.34 $ 55.20
*Typical natural service costs assume $800 salvage value, $500 annual feed & veterinarian, 95% final conception rate, 10% risk and 8% interest rate.
$ 47.44
AI Cost Analysis with Varying Estrus Response and Pregnancy Rates (ABS)
Est
rus
Res
pons
e R
ate
Pregnancy Rate of those Responding
60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
70% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
42%
$64.29
49%
$55.10
56%
$48.21
63%
$42.86
70%
$38.57
80% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
48%
$60.42
56%
$51.79
64%
$45.31
72%
$40.28
80%
$36.25
90% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
54%
$57.41
63%
$49.21
72%
$43.06
81%
$38.27
90%
$34.44
AI Cost Analysis with Varying Estrus Response and Pregnancy Rates (ABS)
Est
rus
Res
pons
e R
ate
Pregnancy Rate of those Responding
60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
70% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
42%
$64.29
49%
$55.10
56%
$48.21
63%
$42.86
70%
$38.57
80% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
48%
$60.42
56%
$51.79
64%
$45.31
72%
$40.28
80%
$36.25
90% % AI PregCost/Synch AI Preg
54%
$57.41
63%
$49.21
72%
$43.06
81%
$38.27
90%
$34.44
Reproduction on the Ranch
• Average Cost of Natural Service per Calf– $2000 bull/25 cows per year/3 years
• $47.44
• Average Cost of Estrus Synchronization and AI– 90% in estrus, 70% pregnancy rate
• $49.21
Reproduction in Mature Cows• Genetics are important (Seedstock)
• Genetics are important (Commercial)
• Match time of calving and peak lactation to available forage
• Body condition score influences post partum anestrus
Reproduction in Mature CowsTrait Total heterosis, %
Cow milk production 9 Calf wn. wt./cow exposeda 18 Cow forage intake 2 Cow efficiency 2 Cow-calf TDN consumed 3 Calf wn. wt./cow wt. 8 Cow longevity 38 Cow lifetime productivity 25 Adapted from Kress, Don D. and M. D. MacNeil. 1999
Reproduction on the Ranch
2
3
4
5
6
7
D J F M A M J J A S O N D0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5BC SMP
Month
BC
SM
P, available lbs/d
1200 lb cow producing 20 lb of milk requires 2 lb of MP inearly lactation
Calving Breeding
**** **
Breeding Soundness Exam
• Structural soundness, scrotal circumference, semen quality
• Pregnancy rates increase 6-10%
• More cows pregnant at first service
• Increase bull to cow ratios (1:40 or higher)
• Every $1 invested yields $17
(Chenoweth 2000)
The FutureThe Future
• Cloning will not be routine in near future
• Synchronized ovulation – timed insemination
• Use of sexed semen
• Cloning will not be routine in near future
• Synchronized ovulation – timed insemination
• Use of sexed semen
Heifers producing Heifers
• More rapid genetic improvement
• Heifer calves weigh approximately 6 pounds less at birth
• Match cows to environment – use terminal sires
Summary• Before using any procedure to modify reproductive
performance, be certain that use of the procedure will advance your goals and fit with available resources.
• A well designed crossbreeding program results in increased conception rates, calf survival, weaning weight, reproductive performance and longevity, which result in increased lifetime productivity and profits.
Summary
• In general, beef heifers should be bred before the cow herd to maximize their chances of rebreeding as first-calf heifers and remaining in the herd.
• The calving/breeding season should be limited and, in most cases, matched to the available forage.
Summary
• In special cases, treatments for synchronization of estrus can induce puberty and/or post-partum estrous cycles and enhance reproductive performance.
• Breeding Soundness Exams for bulls are a key strategy to increase reproductive performance and reduce costs in nearly all cow herds.
Returns on Tested Angus Bulls (ABS)
Data from central bull test
Test A Test B Test C Test D Totals
# Bulls
All angus435 325 136 210 1106
% A.I. Sired
77% 71% 38% 81% 71%
% non A.I. Sired
23% 29% 62% 19% 29%
Avg. $$ A.I. Sired
$2,073.73 $1,661.85 $1,763.46 $1,591.81 $1,828.46
Avg. $$ Non A.I. Sired
$1,733.50 $1,540.26 $1,748.81 $1,491.67 $1,650.16
A.I. Premium
$340.23 $121.58 $14.65 $100.15 $178.30
Reproduction in Mature Cows
Reproduction in Mature Cows
Effect of Mating System
01020304050607080
R RT T
Mating System
Ne
t R
etu
rn (
$/C
ow
)
(R=3-breed rotation, RT=2-breed rotational terminal sire, and T=static
terminal sire)
Reproduction on the Ranch
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Body condition score at calving
Inte
rval
fro
m c
alvi
ng
to
est
rus,
d
Low nutrition
Adequate nutrition
High nutrition
Relative Economic Value
02468
101214161820
Repro Production Product
Wilham
Melton
Average