ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    1/12

    A White Paper for Microsoft Dynamics customers

    RepoRTingVS

    Business InTelligence

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    2/12

    InTRODUCTIOn

    This white paper aims to distinguish the dierence

    between relational reporting solutions and businessintelligence (BI) solutions, to help Microsot Dynamics users

    understand the dierence in commercial benets that each

    provides.

    There is a wide array o solutions available in this particular

    market that may at a glance appear similar, but which have

    signicant dierences in terms o capabilities and technical

    approach. Its important to understand these dierences in

    order to ensure you select the best technology to meet your

    organizations needs.

    RelATionAl RepoRTing03

    Business InTelligence05

    TypicAl chAllenges of

    business inTelligence

    09

    conclusions11

    2

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    3/12

    Most Microsot Dynamics customers are amiliar withreporting. Users have the ability to produce reports directly

    rom Microsot Dynamics itsel or utilize a reporting tool, botho which oten require a skilled sta member or a contractor tocompile the reports. These reports (which may be describedas operational reports, relational reports, at reports, or listreports) are typically distributed daily, weekly, or monthly providing sta with the same inormation on a regular basis.Common types o reports include billing payment history,sales orders, and sales pipeline reports. Microsot Dynamicscustomers use relational reporting to deliver inormation.For many companies, relational reporting is all they know.So what are the issues with this approach? Here we outlinetypical challenges aced by users and consumers o relationalreports.

    Expensive and time consuming

    Whether through an internally hired resource or outsourcedcontractor, report writing requires technical skills that costby the hour. In any ast-paced organization, inormationneeds are dynamic, resulting in requent changes or anyxed report structures. This results in delays and associated

    costs as deep programming skills are needed to createmultiple reports to keep up.

    One Canadian Microsot Dynamics NAV customerexplained:

    Every time a new product was added or a newcategory was set up, it became dicult to workwith NAV reports, including having reports ail.Developers had to make constant adjustments,

    and when a new report was required, that was aninstant $1,500.

    Blair Fleming, Natura World

    Users resort to ofine spreadsheets

    When reports are rigid and marred by delays and costs tomake changes, users oten resort to exporting data to oinespreadsheets that are not connected to the corporate datasource. This causes other problems, most notably datadiscrepancies and errors. Disputes around data validitycan arise when users have conicting versions o the truthcaused by data pulled rom corporate systems at dierenttimes and potential errors during data manipulation.

    RelATionAl RepoRTing

    3

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    4/12

    4

    Limited insights

    While reports can provide users with critical inormationnecessary or decision making, they are oten lengthyand difcult to understand, due to the amount o detailthey contain. The rapid prolieration o data in businesstoday can leave organizations struggling to cope withthe sheer volume o transactional data they accumulate,

    and subsequently report on at length. This can lead tosta skimming or even ignoring reports, because theysimply dont have the time to wade through the masseso inormation provided to nd what they want to know.Traditionally, reports only tell you WHAT happened whatthey dont tell you is WHY. Imagine i your sales managernotices an issue, such as sales o a certain product suddenlydropping. The process to nd out why is then completelymanual maybe more reports have to be written, orregional managers need to be called. The sales manager

    has no way to interact with the data to discover instantlythe causes o the issue. In circumstances such as this,reports dont meet the needs o companies wanting toremain competitive, agile, and alert to new opportunitiesand ways to improve.

    Organizations need to transorm transactions into an evenmore powerul asset real intelligence and insight. Lookingat the same reports over and over does not oster a cultureo proactive management and continuous improvement.Users need to be empowered to look beyond standard

    reporting, and be able to proactively interrogate data touncover the valuable insights that may be hidden within.As one Microsot Dynamics CRM customer in Asia saidwhen comparing standard relational reports to thoseproduced by a business intelligence solution:

    We had been using static orecasting reportsand reporting in the same way rom the same perspective or a long time. But with Business Analytics, I immediately came across problemsthat I didnt know existed. A single report inBusiness Analytics exposed holes in the way I hadbeen analyzing sales, in particular that somelonger term orecasts were infated by redundantdata.

    Erya Houn Houng, First Cambodia

    This brings us to business intelligence.

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    5/12

    5

    The undamental dierence between reporting andbusiness intelligence is the ability to interact with the data toperorm multi-dimensional analysis that provides meaningulbusiness intelligence that will support decisions and

    strategy. The main commercial benet this provides is SPEEDTO ACT to identiy and respond to changes in the economic,competitive, technical and nancial environment. This agilitycan become a unique competitive advantage as companieso all sizes struggle to survive in a constantly changing world.

    Business intelligence provides a completely dierentapproach to using and navigating corporate data one thatis ocused on proactive management through setting goalsand monitoring outcomes. Capabilities include:

    Key Perormance Indicators (KPIs) and scorecards are

    used to set goals, make them visible, monitor perormance,

    and provide alerts when perormance does not match

    expectations.

    Analysis when a problem occurs, ad-hoc analysis can be

    done instantly to identiy where the problem is occurring

    so that remedial action can be taken.

    Dashboards are used to gain a ast, visual overview o

    perormance. They can be sliced and ltered to explore

    data and understand what variables are impacting

    perormance.

    Reports add the lowest value within a BI solution in

    terms o providing drill down inormation to granular or

    transactional data i this level o detail is required.

    Business InTelligence

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    6/12

    6

    KPIs and Scorecards

    Key Perormance Indicators (KPIs) and scorecards helporganizations actually reach their goals, by monitoringthe perormance o everything that is important. Abusiness intelligence system can help a companymonitor every single outcome and process to acceptedlevels or thresholds. As soon as any o these expected

    outcomes or processes alter, a business intelligencesolution alerts a company to take immediate action.

    For example, service quality can be improved greatlyi on-time deliveries by both distributors and suppliersare monitored and agged the minute they all shorto expectations. When companies dont already useKPIs, it can seem a daunting process to develop theright metrics that will help improve perormance. But itdoesnt have to be hard, as your existing reports will tell

    you whats important to measure. For example, take alook at your current reports at the row and column level,and examine the acceptable thresholds o perormanceat data level or summary level.

    Example: A large retailer monitors delivery perormanceo its suppliers. I the agreed delivery perormance byeach distributor is three days, then this metric is alreadyset. Using a business intelligence system, i there is onedistributor whose deliveries take 4.5 days, the retailercan easily identiy other distributors whose perormance

    is above the acceptable threshold, and restructure thesupply chain.

    KPIs can be at both micro and macro levels, andbecause o this, can sometimes appear to be in conict.For example, a salesperson needs to hit sales targets ora current market, but is also expected to do businessdevelopment work in a new market that will not bringin immediate revenue. Monitoring these goals andobjectives can be a challenge unless they are careullycommunicated, managed, monitored and rewarded.Teams must have a clear view o the macro goals theyare contributing towards.

    A business intelligence solution is undamentallydesigned to allow business users to create KPIs to monitorgoals, and roll the KPIs up into scorecards that providean overview this can be at individual, departmental,workgroup, divisional or company level. Combining KPIcapability with alerts when perormance diers romexpectations allows you to manage perormance in a

    very proactive way. Alternatively, a report writing toolonly provides static inormation.

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    7/12

    7

    Analysis

    When a particular outcome or process is not meetingthe expected perormance levels, analysis is requiredto understand why this has happened. Businessintelligence is optimized or querying the data,commonly via OLAP, which stands or online analyticalprocessing. OLAP technology presents inormation in a

    ormat that provides more powerul analysis capabilitiesthan a reporting tool. Traditionally, analysis using arelational reporting tool requires a lot o programming,or exporting to a spreadsheet and developing pivottables. This time consuming process requires technicalskills, thereby preventing instant analysis. It alsoexposes the company to considerable risks when usersmanipulate data in unsecured spreadsheets. Eectivecorporate analysis must be based on a single source othe truth.

    For a business intelligence user, analysis is an instant,simple process because data is already stored in aormat optimized or querying.

    A good BI solution should have a user-riendly interacethat doesnt require technical skills or programming, andas such, a BI user can immediately determine the causesor a certain result by asking any question at any time,and exploring data rom many dierent perspectivesusing ltering, drilling down, slicing, and dicing. Good

    BI solutions allow you to navigate your data on the y,and nd answers to even the most complex questions,without having to write new reports. Once again,business intelligence provides users with the ability tomake good decisions quickly, providing a SPEED TOACT advantage.

    Dashboards

    Dashboards are a collection o analytics that arecomposed into a unied display to provide an instantvisual picture o perormance. For instance, a dashboardmight contain an analysis report, KPI, and a scorecard.Dashboards can be ltered and sliced in various waysto help users explore the data. Specically in the areao nancial perormance, many leaders struggle tocommunicate nancial perormance to others whoare not experts in the eld, and may be too busy toreview detailed nancial reports. A dashboard enablesdata to be communicated visually and quickly. CXOs inparticular oten use dashboards to gain a ast, overall

    view o perormance rom many departments.

    Dashboards provide real estate or your corporatedata. Smart use o this real estate gives a usermaximum inormation on multiple subjects at a glance.

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    8/12

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    9/12

    I BI solutions oer such advantages, why doesnt everyoneuse them? The simple answer is RISK. Deploying BI usingconventional methods exposes a company to considerablerisk due to the time involved in implementing BI, and thetechnical resources needed or deployment. Here we outlinetypical stumbling blocks and what to look or when evaluatinga BI solution.

    The Back End: Data Structures

    To achieve ongoing perormance monitoring (KPIs)and analysis capability, the greatest challenge is tohave the data available in a ormat that is optimized or

    business analysis. Transactional tables typically usedor relational reporting (rows and columns) are welloptimized or capturing data and processes. However,the row and column table structure does not allow easyquery o the data. On the other hand, a data warehouseand OLAP cube (multi-dimensional data) is designedexclusively or ad-hoc business analysis and monitoring.

    It is imperative that the BI system supports the businesslogic o how transactions are treated in the underlyingbusiness system. I the BI system does not do this,

    incorrect results will be returned. It is also importantthat the BI system can easily adapt to new business logicthat might be adopted in the uture as the businesschanges.

    The eort needed to build a comprehensive datawarehouse, OLAP cubes, and reports MANUALLYon a moderately customized Microsot Dynamicsapplication (assume 20% customization) can requiremonths o development work i you select a solution

    that relies heavily on manual processes to build theback end o the solution. The ongoing maintenance othe BI solution in this instance would also require deeptechnical expertise and signicant time.

    Questions to ask when evaluating the back end o a BIsolution:

    How easily and quickly can the back end

    data structure be developed to deliver a

    comprehensive BI solution across all subject

    areas in your ERP or CRM system?

    What is the depth o technical skills required to

    deploy the solution?

    TypicAl chAllenges of

    business inTelligence

    9

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    10/12

    How much technical expertise is required to

    maintain and make uture enhancements to the

    BI solution?

    Will a BI solution be created that is unique to

    your organization and your individual BI needs?

    For example, will all your Microsot Dynamics

    customizations be available or analysis?

    How exible is the BI solution on an ongoingbasis? Can you change it to suit your

    organization, departmental and individual user

    needs?

    Is the BI solution based on industry standard

    technology, or is it black box proprietary

    technology?

    The Front End: Analytics Interace

    Typically, the burden o producing reports and analysisor Microsot Dynamics users alls on the IT department,as specialist technical skills are required to produce theend result. This task takes considerable time, typicallyhindering other time-sensitive responsibilities o theIT department. Users who bypass the IT departmentand export corporate data to spreadsheets expose thecompany to data discrepancies and risks.

    A BI solution should eliminate this tedious work and

    corporate risk, and allow IT departments to ocus onmore important challenges and strategy.

    Questions to ask when evaluating the ront end o a BIsolution:

    Can business users easily generate their own

    KPIs, scorecards, analysis, reports (including

    management reports and report scheduling),

    dashboards, and alerts without specialist skills

    or any programming? Is the ront end o the BI solution easy to

    maintain, so that the IT department is not

    burdened with maintenance and support? For

    example, a browser-based, zero ootprint BI

    application is easier to maintain and support

    compared with a BI solution using a client-server

    architecture.

    Is the solution easily consumed rom or

    integrated with other Microsot technologies,

    such as Outlook, SharePoint and MicrosotDynamics CRM and NAV?

    Can existing Reporting Services reports be called

    and or users to lter them dynamically using

    the BI solution?

    10

  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    11/12

    11

    A reporting tool and a BI solution are very dierent.Reporting tools provide inormation, whereas BI solutionsprovide insight, and the ability to monitor and manageperormance. Companies with a BI solution gain a SPEED TO

    ACT advantage, can reduce costs and improve perormancemanagement, as they manage their business proactively.

    In todays environment, change is the only constant.Remaining proactive and agile is a unique competitiveadvantage in itsel, and one that business intelligence enables.Its not just survival o the ttest, but also survival o thequickest. I you can beat your competitor to take advantageo a new trend, or set strategies to ward o an impendingdownturn, youre already one step ahead. The question is notso much can you aord business intelligence, but can youaord to be without it?

    For more inormation about Zap Business Intelligence orMicrosot Dynamics CRM, NAV and AX solutions visitwww.zaptechnology.com

    Conclusions

    http://www.zaptechnology.com/http://www.zaptechnology.com/
  • 8/8/2019 ReportingvsBusinessIntelligence Whitepaper v2

    12/12

    12