77
Project Description - Final Report Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator) Kensington (Parcel Nos. 413773 and 1023241), Prince County, PEI JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT NO. JE0283 Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation P.O. Box 250 Kensington, PE C0B 1M0 Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. DE Jardine Consulting P.O. Box 19 (1088 Colville Road) 223 Winsloe Road (Rte. No. 223) North Wiltshire PEI C0A 1Y0 Winsloe South, PE C1E 2Y2 www.jooseenv.com www.dejardineconsulting.ca March 22, 2018

Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

  • Upload
    trandan

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Project Description - Final Report Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator)

Kensington (Parcel Nos. 413773 and 1023241), Prince County, PEI

JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT NO. JE0283

Report prepared for:

PEI Grain Elevator Corporation P.O. Box 250

Kensington, PE C0B 1M0

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. DE Jardine Consulting P.O. Box 19 (1088 Colville Road) 223 Winsloe Road (Rte. No. 223) North Wiltshire PEI C0A 1Y0 Winsloe South, PE C1E 2Y2 www.jooseenv.com www.dejardineconsulting.ca

March 22, 2018

Page 2: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Environmental Impact Statement Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator) - Kensington, Prince County, PE

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - February 20, 2018 I

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

Executive Summary

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) and DE Jardine Consulting (DE

Jardine) were contracted by Mr. Neil Campbell of the PEI Grain Elevator Corporation (PEIGEC)

to complete a Project Description for the proposed expansion of the PEI Grain Elevator No. 1

Facility (Kensington Grain Elevator) in Kensington (Parcel Nos. 413773 and 1023241), Prince

County, PEI.

The PEIGEC is proposing the expansion of the Kensington Grain Elevator due to changes in the

PEI agricultural industry. With less livestock production, more cash cropping and greater yield

potential, the PEIGEC current operational capacity and infrastructure does not meet the needs

of the commercial grain and oilseed sector.

The subject property for the proposed expansion is located adjacent to the current Kensington

Grain Elevator facility and PEIGEC has an agreement to purchase in place. The subject

property encompasses an area of 3.3 hectares (8.82 acres) and is identified as Parcel No.

1023241. The subject site is currently undeveloped agricultural farmland which has been in

production for over 50 years. As part of the expansion the subject property would be

consolidated with the current Kensington Grain Elevator property under Parcel No. 413773.

The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental

Protection Act. This Project Description document was prepared following the guidance as laid

out in Section 9.

As part of the Project Description the following mitigation and environmental monitoring

elements will be adhered to during the construction and operation of the proposed facility,

including:

Mitigation

• During construction and operation all provincial and federal codes, standards and best

management practices will be followed;

• During construction and operation (including accidents, potential malfunctions and

unplanned events) the contractors Environmental Protection Plan and PEIGEC ERP will

be adhered to;

Page 3: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 ii ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

• During operation mitigation for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste will be conducted as outlined in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 in Sections 3.2.6 and 3.2.7 of this report; and

• An earthen berm will be constructed around the perimeter along the north and east

boundaries to reduce noise levels and improve the aesthetics experienced on adjacent

properties.

Environmental Monitoring

• During the construction period personnel, the PEIGEC’s project manager will conduct

regular environmental monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components

adhere to the provincial and federal regulations and codes as well as the

procedures/controls outlined in the contractors Environmental Protection Plan (EPP).

Based on the information obtained during the preparation of this Project Description, it can be

concluded that the potential environmental effects of the proposed project on all valued

environmental components (VECs - listed in Section 6 of this report) would not be significant

during the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed facility with the planned

mitigation and monitoring elements in place. Consequently, it is recommended that the

proposed project should proceed as described and outlined in this report.

The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the limitations included in

Section 8.0 and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.

Page 4: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 iii ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 PROJECT NAME, PROPONENT INFORMATION AND AUTHORS OF PROJECT

DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Project Overview .................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Current Site Description, Historical and Adjacent Land Use ................................. 1

1.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 2

1.4 REGULATIONS AND STATUTES FOR ASSESSING THE PROJECT ............................... 3

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4

2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 4

2.2 ALTERNATIVES TO PROJECT (OPTIONS CONSIDERED) .............................................. 5

2.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 5

3.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 6

3.1 PLANNING COMPONENT .................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 Property Acquisition ............................................................................................. 6 3.1.2 Project Survey ...................................................................................................... 6

3.2 CONSTRUCTION COMPONENT ....................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Site Preparation and Access ................................................................................ 6 3.2.2 Site Structures and Operating Stations ................................................................. 7 3.2.3 Site Services (Water, Sewer and Power) .............................................................. 7 3.2.4 Storm Water Management ................................................................................... 8 3.2.5 Fuel Storage ......................................................................................................... 8 3.2.6 Hazardous Materials Storage ............................................................................... 8 3.2.7 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage ....................................................................... 9

3.3 OPERATION COMPONENT ............................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Use of Facility ....................................................................................................... 9 3.3.2 Operating Hours ................................................................................................... 9 3.3.3 Agricultural Crop Storage Operation ....................................................................10 3.3.4 Wastewater Management ....................................................................................10 3.3.5 Air Quality and Noise ...........................................................................................10 3.3.6 Site Security ........................................................................................................12 3.3.7 Emergency Response and Training.....................................................................12 3.3.8 Litter ....................................................................................................................14

3.4 DECOMMISSIONING ........................................................................................................14

4.0 SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................14

4.1 METHODOLOGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................14

4.2 CONSULTATION ...............................................................................................................15

5.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................16

Page 5: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 iv ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

5.1 PHYSICAL SETTING .........................................................................................................16 5.1.1 Surficial Geology .................................................................................................16 5.1.2 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................17 5.1.3 Topography and Regional Drainage ....................................................................17 5.1.4 Surface Water Drainage ......................................................................................17

5.2 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES .............................................................17

5.3 ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................17

5.4 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................18

5.5 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................19

6.0 PROJECT INTERACTIONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT (VECS TABLE) ........................19

7.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................22

8.0 CLOSURE .........................................................................................................................23

9.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................24

List of Tables Table 1-1 Project Information ………………………………………………………………… 1

Table 1-2 Adjoining Properties - Current Land Use………………………………………… 2

Table 1-3 Approval Required - Proposed Kensington Grain Elevator Expansion………. 4

Table 3-1 Hazardous Materials Storage……………………………………………………. 8

Table 3-2 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage………………………………………………. 9

Table 3.3 Incoming and Outgoing Shipments to Kensington Grain Elevator Property…... 11

Table 5-1 Climate Norma Data 1981-2010 for Summerside Airport (Environment Can.). 18

Table 6-1 Proposed Project - VECs Interaction and Mitigation ……………………………. 19

List of Appendices Appendix A Figure and Drawing

Appendix B MSDS Information

Appendix C Kensington Grain Elevator Proposed Expansion - Noise Assessment

Appendix D Questions/Comments and Associated Answers/Responses from Public and Technical Review Committee

Page 6: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 1

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. (Joose Environmental) and DE Jardine Consulting (DE

Jardine) were contracted by Mr. Neil Campbell of the PEI Grain Elevator Corporation (PEIGEC)

to complete a Project Description for the purposed expansion of the PEI Grain Elevator No. 1

Facility (Kensington Grain Elevator) in Kensington (Parcel Nos. 413773 and 1023241), Prince

County, PEI.

1.1 Project Name, Proponent Information and Authors of PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Information regarding the project name, proponent and authors of the Project Description is

provided in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1. Project Information

Project Name Proposed Expansion of PEI Grain Elevator No 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator)

Proponent

Information

PEI Grain Elevator Corporation (PEIGEC)

Contact: Mr. Neil Campbell - General Manager PEIGEC

Authors of Project

Description

DE Jardine Consulting: Mr. Don Jardine, B.Sc.

Joose Environmental: Mr. Peter Joostema, P. Eng., CESA, FEC

1.2 Project Information

1.2.1 Project Overview

PEIGEC is proposing to expand and modernize the PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain

Elevator) facility with the expansion to situated adjacent to the existing facility in Kensington

(Parcel Nos. 413773 and 1023241), Prince County, PEI. The existing facility and proposed

expansion site is located north of Route No. 2 with the Old Summerside Road bordering the site

to the north.

1.2.2 Current Site Description, Historical and Adjacent Land Use

The subject property for the proposed expansion is located adjacent to the current Kensington

Grain Elevator facility for which PEIGEC has an agreement to purchase in place. The subject

property encompasses an area of 3.3 hectares (8.82 acres) and is identified as Parcel No.

1023241 (refer to Figure No. 1 and Drawing No. 1, Appendix A). The subject site is bordered

to the south by the Confederation Trail (followed by Highway No. 2) and to the north by the Old

Summerside Road which is the access to the existing facility and will remain the access to the

newly expanded facility. As part of the expansion the subject property would be consolidated

with the current Kensington Grain Elevator property under Parcel No. 413773.

Page 7: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 2

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

The subject site is currently undeveloped agricultural farmland that is actively farmed by

Heritage Farms Ltd. with the production of potatoes on a regular crop rotation. The majority of

the property has been used for agricultural purposes since at least 1935 with a small southeast

portion being woodland. Based on aerial photographs dating back to 1935 no structures have

been developed on the subject site.

The District of New Annan is an unincorporated area with development regulated by Municipal

Affairs and Provincial Planning Division of PEIDCLE.

Adjacent and surrounding land use to the proposed project site is summarized in Table 1-2.

Table 1-2. Adjoining Properties - Current Land Use

Direction Current Land Use Current Occupant

North (across Old Summerside Road) Residential and

Commercial

Residential Dwellings and Vehicle

Repair Facility

East Residential Residential Dwelling

South

Recreational,

Residential and

Commercial

Confederation Trail followed by Route

No. 2. Across Route No. 2 Residential

Dwellings, Commercial Buildings,

Excavation Pit and Farmland

West Agricultural commercial Current Grain Elevator Facility followed

by Cavendish Agri Services.

1.3 Regulatory Framework

The Project Description for the proposed project has been conducted based on the regulatory

framework outlined in Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act (EPA).

Section 9 of the PEI EPA sets out the requirements of the environmental assessment process

that the proponent of an undertaking must complete before a project can proceed. The term

“undertaking” as outlined in the PEI EPA includes any construction, industry, operation or other

project which will or may:

i. cause the emission or discharge of any contaminant into the environment;

ii. have an effect on any unique, rare or endangered feature or the environment;

iii. have a significant effect on the environment or necessitate further development

which is likely to have a significant effect on the environment; or

Page 8: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 3

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

iv. cause public concern because of its real or perceived effect or potential effect

on the environment.

As stated in the subsections of Section 9 in the PEI EPA, the process must adhere to the

following:

(1) No person shall initiate any undertaking unless that person first files a written

proposal with the Department and obtains from the Minister written approval to

proceed with the proposed undertaking.

(2) The minister, in considering a proposal submitted pursuant to subsection (1),

may

- require the person submitting it to supply such additional information as

the Minister may require;

- require that person to carry out an environmental impact assessment

and submit an environmental impact statement;

- notify the public of the proposal and provide opportunity for comment.

(3) An environmental assessment and environmental impact statement shall/have

such content as the Minister may direct.

(4) The approval required by this section is in addition to any other requirements

imposed by the province or a municipality.

As part of the process, the environmental impact assessment (EIA) and corresponding Project

Description must be completed and submitted to the Technical Review Committee (comprised

of provincial regulatory agencies and potentially federal regulatory agencies) for review of the

proposed project. At the end of the EIA process, a determination on the proposed project

approval would be made (i.e., not approved, approved or approved with conditions). Should the

Project Description be approved, the Minister of the PEI Department of Communities, Land and

Environment (PEIDCLE) issues a written approval pursuant to Section 28 of the PEI EPA.

1.4 Regulations and Statutes for Assessing the Project

An outline of the environmental legislation, approvals and guidelines that may be applicable to

the proposed project is provided in Table 1-3.

Page 9: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 4

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

Table 1-3. Approvals Required - Proposed Expansion of PEI Grain Elevator No. 1

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed project is the expansion of the Kensington Grain Elevator facility which will

enhance the economic viability of the PEIGEC and the agricultural industry on PEI. The

planned expansion will be added to the existing facility on the adjacent property to the west

which is currently owned by Heritage Farms (i.e., Parcel No. 1023241)

2.1 Project Background

The existing grain elevator operation was constructed in 1969 and has undergone some

expansions over the years with the addition of new silo type grain storage. The grain elevator

building is a wooden structure and has experienced some deterioration over the years with

some of the walls starting to buckle and are thus in need of replacement. Based on the age and

capacity of the current Kensington Grain Elevator facility it was determined that the existing

operation needed to be modernized and expanded for the following reasons:

• meet the current industry standards;

• provide increased volume and capacity due to the expansion in acreage of the various

grain/oilseed crops grown in the surrounding area (existing on-site storage capacity has

been exceeded and off-site facilities had to be procured in Halifax);

• improved efficiency/quality of service; and

• enhance economic viability of the PEIGEC and the agricultural industry on PEI.

As a result, the proposed project involves the construction/operation of an expanded and

modernized grain elevator operation which will include; dryer units, high capacity holding tanks

for grain/oilseeds and an office with associated electrical/mechanical areas.

Required Approval Legislative Authority Authority Status

Environmental Impact Assessment

Section 9 of the PEI EPA PEIDCLE Application submitted on December 21, 2017

Development Permit PEIDCLE Inspection Services Branch within the Department

PEIDCLE Inspection Services Branch within the Department

Application to be submitted by PEIGEC.

Entrance Way Permits

PEI Roads Act, Highway Access Regulations

PEI Department of Transportation, infrastructure and Energy (PEIDTIE)

Utilizing existing access, no new permit required by PEIDTIG.

Page 10: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 5

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

The proposed layout of the new facility is shown on Drawing No. 1, Appendix A.

2.2 Alternatives to Project (Options Considered)

Alternatives to the project were considered including: 1) continuing of the existing operation with

purchase of additional offsite storage and 2) review of potential locations for the proposed new

facility. Remaining at the current location was deemed to be the most acceptable option due to

the historical operation in the area for nearly 50 years and the adjacent agricultural commercial

land use in the area such as the Cavendish Agra Facility.

A review of alternative locations for the proposed facility determined that different sites were not

acceptable due to various factors including, but not limited to the following:

- surrounding land use and development (outside town limits, central in the

agricultural community, adjacent an all-weather highway (Route No. 2) and

access to three phase power);

- topography and surface drainage; and

- economic viability.

2.3 Project Schedule

The proposed new facility will be completed during the 2018 calendar year as outlined below:

• Property Acquisition - April 2018;

• Preliminary Groundwork (i.e., survey, etc.) - May 2018

• Construction Phase - Mid May 2018 to December 2018; and

• Commissioning of Facility - January 2019.

An overview of the proposed development is provided on Drawing No. 1, Appendix A.

Page 11: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 6

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

3.0 PROJECT ACTIVITIES

A description of the project activities for the new facility has been broken down into four main

components including:

• Planning;

• Construction;

• Operation; and

• Decommissioning.

3.1 Planning Component

3.1.1 Property Acquisition

An option for purchase of the adjacent property for the proposed project has been secured from

Heritage Farms and is expected to be completed by April 2018.

3.1.2 Project Survey

A topographical survey of the subject site will be completed in April 2018 (prior to the initiation of

construction) to aid with the layout and design of the proposed facility.

3.2 Construction Component

During the construction component it is expected that the equipment to be used will include, but

is not limited to excavators, bull dozers/earth movers, and tandem dump trucks. During the

construction period the PEIGEC’s project manager will conduct regular environmental

monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components adhere to all provincial and

federal regulations and codes as well as the procedures/controls outlined in contractor’s

Environmental Protection Plan (EPP).

3.2.1 Site Preparation and Access

The site preparation will involve stripping areas of the site which are proposed to be developed

and adding appropriate fill materials as required. The top soil grubbed from the areas to be

developed will be maintained on the subject site and will be utilized on-site for earthen berms

and landscaped areas. Select borrow and other aggregate fill materials will be required to build

up portions of the subject site for the various phases.

Page 12: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 7

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

Site Access

The existing two site accesses to the proposed facility from the Old Summerside Road will be

utilized during construction and operation of the expanded facility. No significant issues

associated with the site access are expected as these access locations have been in place for

nearly 50 years.

3.2.2 Site Structures and Operating Stations

The new facility will be in addition to the existing facility located on the site. The existing office

and receiving area will continue to be used.

Photo No. 1: Existing Grain Storage Structure

3.2.3 Site Services (Water, Sewer and Power)

Existing on-site water and sewer services at the current Kensington Grain Elevator facility will

be maintained for the expanded facility (refer to Drawing No. 1, Appendix A). The well has had

routine work to the pump and the septic system has been in place since 1970.

Existing electric power transmission facilities will be maintained for the proposed expanded

facility.

Page 13: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 8

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

3.2.4 Storm Water Management

The storm water will drain as per the contours of the land by overland flow and infiltration.

Storm water collected from the operational areas including the storage structures will continue

to be directed to drainage ditches established along the access roads and to the ditch along the

south side of the Old Summerside Road.

3.2.5 Fuel Storage

The existing propane and furnace oil storage units will be used for the expanded facility. This

includes a 2,000 L diesel aboveground storage tank (AST), 3 - 2,000 L and 1 - 1,000 L propane

ASTs. The propane ASTs are owned by the contracted propane supplier which is a provincial

government contract arrangement which is currently with Superior Propane Ltd. The diesel AST

is enclosed within a secondary concrete containment bunker.

3.2.6 Hazardous Materials Storage

Hazardous material storage for the expanded operation will be limited to the fuels listed in the

previous section. Pest control product bait stations will also be deployed on site to control any

potential vectors attracted to the site. This service is currently provided via a contract with

Orchin Canada, who provide an annual certificate about the rodent control system. Any

rodenticides used are contained within the bait traps at various locations at the current facility

and will be utilized for the expanded operation as well. An inventory of the types of hazardous

materials to be stored at the proposed expanded facility is provided in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1. Hazardous Materials Storage

Activity Potential Contaminants Human Health Issues/Mitigation

Vector control Rodenticides Products will be contained inside secure containers.

Compressed gas storage - Propane

Air contaminants (in case of fire), toxic smoke

Fire and spill response procedures as per PEIGEC Emergency Response Plan.

Lubricants Oil and grease, WD 40. Tubes of grease are mainly food grade.

Small quantities with appropriate spill response procedures

Petroleum storage Diesel fuel, furnace oil and additives.

Spill response procedure as per PEIGEC ERP.

Material safety data sheets (MSDS) will be kept up-to-date in a central location which is easily

accessible by all personnel at the Kensington Grain Elevator facility. An emergency spill

Page 14: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 9

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

response kit will be provided on site with staff trained in the proper method of responding to

spills, leaks or chemical exposure. The MSDS information for the applicable hazardous

materials in use at the current site are included in Appendix B).

3.2.7 Non-Hazardous Materials Storage

There are quantities of non-hazardous material which will be stored at the site. A list of these

with suggested mitigation procedures is provided Table 3-2.

Table 3-2. Non-Hazardous Materials Storage

Material Potential Issue Mitigation

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

Litter, leaching of contaminants MSW to be sorted as per waste watch requirements and placed in secure storage containers. Waste, compost and recyclables to be transported to appropriate management facilities as required, eliminating odours and preventing overflow of storage containers.

Grain and oil seed products

Subject to overheating and spontaneous combustions

Drier and ventilation fans, temperature sensors inside storage bins,

3.3 Operation Component

The current grain/oilseed silo units will continue operation with the expectation that new

expanded storage structures will be ready for operation for the fall/winter of 2018 as part of the

expanded facility. A new elevator building with modern dryer units will be built on the subject

site (adjacent property to the current grain elevator facility - Parcel No. 1023241) in the vicinity

of the new silo storage tanks.

3.3.1 Use of Facility

The site is accessible to customers who are selling or purchasing grain and soybean products.

The site is open to the public and the Confederation Trail (i.e., Rails to Trails) public walking and

cycling route passes on the southern boundary of the property. Bulk transport vehicles will

access the site during stockpiling periods and during the delivery of products to the end users.

3.3.2 Operating Hours

During the harvest season (i.e., August to November) the facility will operate daily (6 days per

week) between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. The off-season operating hours will be dependent on

Page 15: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 10

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

weather conditions and demand for products, but the site will be open daily from 7:00 am to

5:00 pm under normal operating conditions.

3.3.3 Agricultural Crop Storage Operation

The new facility will store increased volumes of products at the subject site when the expansion

is completed by the end of 2018.

As part of the operation of the Kensington Grain Elevator facility equipment to be used at the

site would include front end loader, electric fans and dryers, fuel delivery vehicles, snow

removal equipment, grass cutting, electric mobile conveyers and single/double tandem dump

trucks.

3.3.4 Wastewater Management

The existing on-site sewage disposal system will continue to be used for the expanded

operation. Please refer to Drawing No. 1, Appendix A for the location of this system.

3.3.5 Air Quality and Noise

The main air quality issues associated with the new facility would include:

• emissions from vehicles;

• fugitive fine particulate matter (dust) from activities on bare soil or unpaved site access

roads; loading and unloading of grain products, and

• potential air contaminants in case of fire as indicated in Section 3.2.6 which can be

mitigated as per the same section.

There are several potential generators of noise from site operations including:

• operations at the facility including but not limited to dryer motors and fans;

• heavy equipment and trucks operating on the site;

• loading and unloading materials;

• tail gate clanging;

• back up alarms on vehicles; and

Page 16: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 11

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

• grass cutting and related activities.

For the current operation the five-day average is 1,866 trucks coming in to the plant from August

until December. The majority are smaller trucks from potato farmers with each truck hauling 15

metric tonnes (MT), which would equal 28,000 MT of various products. A breakdown of

incoming and outgoing deliveries of grain and soybean products to the site is provided in Table

3.3. The typical delivery vehicle from a farm for grain products is 15 MT and for soybeans is 20

MT. The outgoing vehicles are typically 32 MT.

Table 3.3 Incoming and Outgoing Shipments to Kensington Grain Elevator Property

Time Period Product Number of trucks Direction Quantity (mt)

August/September Grains 1200 Incoming 18,000

August/September Grains 200 Outgoing 6,400

October/November Soybeans 500 Incoming 10,000

October/November Soybeans 200 Outgoing 6,400

January to July 31st All products 475 Outgoing 15,200

Notes: MT = Metric Tonne

No extra truck traffic on the volumes is currently expected but this is dependent on growers,

who may increase their crop acreage. It is expected that the expanded facility will average the

same level of traffic over the year, instead of the intensive months from August to December.

This will also reduce the operating hours, especially the early morning and late evening hours.

The management for the facility have not received any noise, dust or odour complaints during

the previous years of operation. A representative of PEIDCLE had one resident on the Old

Summerside Road mention some dust being deposited on vehicles during a visit to the area in

the Fall of 2017. This complaint was not investigated at the time of occurrence, so the source of

the dust was not confirmed. For the project and during future operations PEIGEC will be

arranging with PEICLE to establish a dust/noise reporting agreement, whereby PEIGEC will be

notified of any reports received by PEICLE and PEIGEC can immediately look into their

operations”. This shows a response/mitigation process for any future items and can be simply a

request letter from PEIGEC to PEICLE.

On November 16, 2010 there was a fire caused by one of the dryer fans on the site. This fire

was extinguished in compliance with PEIGEC’s ERP without major damage to the facility.

Page 17: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 12

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

An earthen berm will be constructed along the north and east boundaries of the site to reduce

noise for adjacent residents. This will be completed when the topsoil is stripped from the

existing field.

As part of the current Project Description a Noise Assessment was carried out at the current

facility on December 28, 2017 by DE Jardine and Joose Environmental on behalf of the

PEIGEC with the report provided in Appendix C. The results of the Noise Assessment

concluded that assuming the equipment to be used will be similar to the existing equipment at

the current operation, it is reasonable to expect sound levels will not exceed any human health

related standard for noise (80 dB).

3.3.6 Site Security

Security will be completed as per federal and provincial legislation for the materials being stored

on the site. The PEIGEC will conduct regular inspections and will have the following security

measures in place including:

• Motion sensors with lighting;

• Video surveillance system; and

• Phone line

3.3.7 Emergency Response and Training

Fire extinguishers will be provided inside the office area and emergency call numbers for the

local fire department, EMS, RCMP and environmental emergency response will be posted in

prominent locations. The site is located in the Kensington Fire District and a fire hall is located

within 5 km of the proposed site.

All site staff will be trained in emergency response basics and will be aware of all protocols for

notification in the event of emergency situations. Staff will also be trained as per the ERP

developed by the PEIGEC safety coordinator.

A potential evident or accident may include a fire or explosion caused by grain dust as the four

basic elements for this type of event exist at this site including:

• Fuel source - very small particles of grain dust suspended in the air;

• Oxygen - adequate air supply;

Page 18: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 13

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

• Confinement - grain bin or silo, etc.; and

• Ignition source - overheating equipment, faulty electrical, vehicle fire, cigarette butt etc.

In the event of a fire or explosion PEIGEC employees have been trained and would adhere to

the ERP. To prevent the potential event of an explosion the following operational mitigative

measures should be followed:

• Maintain a rigorous housekeeping and sanitation program inside the grain elevator

structure. Keep grain dust cleaned up in all working areas of the elevator;

• Implement a weekly or bi-weekly (or as specified by the manufacturer) bearing

lubrication program, based on the bearing manufacturer’s specifications;

• Use a food-grade mineral oil spray system on grain during transfer and loadout;

• Install bearing temperature monitors and or sensors on designated equipment within the

grain elevator facility for early detection of potential failures;

• Install quick-opening cleanout doors on leg boot side panels for grain and dust cleanout;

• Install dust aspiration systems at grain transfer points or ventilation systems with

designated areas of the grain elevator facility;

• Clean out all dust handling equipment and associated infrastructure at intervals

recommended by the manufacturer;

• Install dump pit baffles on truck dump pits to provide a major reduction in airborne dust

during dumping operation;

• Incorporate explosion relief panels and devices in elevator design as well as the use of

explosion proof electrical outlets and equipment in sensitive areas; and

• Train employees on the dangers and prevention of dust explosions and checking

vehicles for leaks of petroleum products.

• No smoking except at designated areas.

Page 19: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 14

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

3.3.8 Litter

Site staff will monitor for the presence of litter on a regular basis and will make arrangements for

the picking of litter when deemed necessary by the site manager.

3.4 Decommissioning

It is expected the life capacity of the proposed facility will be a minimum of several decades. At

some point it is understood the proposed facility will be decommissioned at the end of its service

life. At that time the site will be decommissioned in accordance with the applicable standards,

guidelines and regulations for that period. It is expected that the existing grain elevator building

will be torn down once the new facility is up and operating.

4.0 SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The details of the environmental impact assessment including methodology and consultation

process are outlined in the following sections.

4.1 Methodology of Environmental Assessment

An EIA is an important process for reviewing potential environmental effects associated with the

development of proposed projects. In order to enable the review of potential issues, an

understanding and description of the environment where the proposed development will occur,

or have a possible impact on, was developed from the review of existing information available

for the area. The potential positive and negative interactions between the proposed project

activities and the environment were identified. In the event negative interactions were

anticipated and the potential effects were deemed a concern, mitigation methods were put forth

for consideration.

As identified in the PEIDCLE Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines (Revised January

2010) a complete process is completed in stages as outlined below:

• Stage 1: Describing the proposed project and establishing environmental baseline

conditions for the subject site.

• Stage 2: Determining the potential environmental issues and limits of the EIA in relation

to the proposed project.

• Stage 3: Accessing the potential environmental effects of the project.

Page 20: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 15

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

• Stage 4: Identifying mitigation measures to remove/minimize potential adverse effects to

the environment.

• Stage 5: Establish environmental monitoring and follow-up programs (if required).

The EIA focuses on the evaluation of Valued Environmental Components (VECs) that are those

aspects of the ecosystem of associated socio-economic systems that are important to the public

and other stakeholders. The VECs for the proposed project were selected based on the

interactions between the proposed project activities and the environmental and known or

perceived public concerns related to social, cultural, economic or aesthetic values. All Phases

of the proposed project are assessed including:

• Construction;

• Operation and Maintenance;

• Accidents (i.e., fire from propane, hydrocarbons or grain dust) or malfunctions; and

• Unplanned events due to weather or other factors.

4.2 Consultation

As part of the consultation process meetings were held with representatives of the PEIDCLE to

discuss the proposed project to determine the required scope of the environmental assessment

and the overall level required for the biophysical component of the study. PEIGEC

representatives also met with the following municipal, provincial and federal organizations:

• PEI Department of Agriculture and Fisheries;

• PEI Department of Justice and Public Safety;

• Kensington Fire Department; and

• PEI Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy;

The proposed site was visited by the consultant (Joose Environmental and DE Jardine

Consulting) to review current site conditions and operations on the adjacent properties.

Page 21: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 16

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

PEIDCLE contacted the Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat, staff of which were not aware of any

archaeological or traditional Mi’kmaq use of the subject project and had no evidence that the

proposed project would have an adverse impact of any asserted Aboriginal or treaty rights.

Stakeholders and the general public will be invited to participate in the environmental

assessment process of the proposed project. It has been determined, in consultation with

PEIDCLE that a Level II Public Consultation will be required for the proposed project with a

public information session. The purpose of the public consultation is to inform the residents in

the local area and general public about the proposed project and any potential environmental

issues. Upon submission of the Project Description document, PEIGEC will host a public

information session to advise the public of the proposed project and provide contact information

for the PEIDCLE assessment officer to provide comments and request additional information.

The Project Description will be posted on the Government of PEI website

(www.princeedwardisland.ca) and any other media deemed applicable along with other related

information regarding the proposed project.

Comments/questions regarding the proposed project can be submitted to the PEIDCLE

assessment officer for a period of ten (10) days following the posting of the notice within the

local newspaper. Comments/questions regarding the proposed development obtained from the

public and the technical review committee is outlined in Table D-1 (Appendix D) along with

corresponding answers/responses.

5.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

The following sections provide an overview of the existing environmental setting at the subject

site.

5.1 Physical Setting

5.1.1 Surficial Geology

Based on an available surficial geology map, the native surficial soils of the subject site consist

of glacial till deposits, principally comprised of a combination of gravel, sand, silt and clay. The

characteristic permeability of these soils is moderate. Information obtained for agricultural soils

for the area (PEI Department of Agriculture and Forestry - 1:5800 mapping and Soils of Prince

Edward Island, Prince County - 1:75000 mapping) indicates that the surficial soil type at the

subject site consists predominately of a Charlottetown (Ch) map unit with approximately ten

percent of the Malpeque (Ma) map unit. The Ch soils are well suited for a variety of crops

Page 22: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 17

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

although erosion hazard is a limiting factor. These soils have good drainage and permeability

characteristics with the slope class for the area being undulating to gently rolling.

5.1.2 Bedrock Geology

Based on an available geology maps, bedrock around the subject site consists of Upper

Palaeozoic (Pictou Group) Lower Permian Megacyclic Sequence III - that is made up of

redbeds; conglomerate, sandstone and siltstone (H.W. van de Poll, 1977). The bedrock

bedding strike is approximately east-west along the axis of PEI and the flat-lying bedrock dip is

north to northeast at one to three degrees (van de Poll, 1983). The depth below ground surface

to the bedrock is variable but an overburden thickness of approximately 5 m would be typical in

this area.

5.1.3 Topography and Regional Drainage

Based on available topographic mapping and the observed site topography, regional drainage

(anticipated groundwater flow direction) is relatively flat with a slight downward grade to the

northwest (i.e., towards a tributary of the Barbara Weit River) at an average gradient of

approximately 3 percent.

5.1.4 Surface Water Drainage

Surfaces at the site currently consist primarily of commercial grain storage and farmland with

wooded hedgerows along the east boundary of the subject expansion property with surface

water anticipated to drain by infiltration and overland flow into the drainage ditches located

along the Old Summerside Road. Most of the surface drainage is expected to flow towards the

Barbara Weit River located to the northwest of the subject site.

5.2 Surface and Groundwater Resources

The subject site is located within the Barbara Weit watershed with no watercourses or wetlands

on the proposed site. The tributary of the Barbara Weit River is located approximately 500 m

from the nearest point on the proposed property development (refer to Drawing No. 2,

Appendix A). The major user of groundwater in this watershed is the Cavendish Farms Potato

processing facility located to the west of the subject site. The expanded facility plans to use the

existing well which was installed when the original development occurred at the site.

5.3 Atmospheric Environment

Air quality in the area surrounding the subject site is affected by activities associated with local

traffic, commercial/industrial operations. In general, the air quality in the area surrounding the

Page 23: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 18

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

proposed project site meets the air quality standards as set out by the PEI EPA Air Quality

Regulations.

The nearest climate station is located at the Summerside Airport which is located within 15 km

of the proposed site. Climate records are available for this station from 1942 to the present.

Climate normal data is available from Environment Canada for the 1981 to 2010-time period

with Table 5-1 showing the normal values for each month during this time interval.

Table 5.1 Climate Normal Data 1981-2010 for Summerside Airport (Environment Canada)

Parameter Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year

Daily Avg Temp (C)

-7.7 -6.9 -2.9 3.0 9.5 14.7 19.2 18.6 14.1 8.4 2.6 -3.8 5.7

Rainfall (mm)

25.2 24.9 34.6 61.3 94.9 91.3 74.1 92.7 96.8 87.0 77.2 49.2 809.1

Snowfall (cm)

78.5 53.4 47.4 22.2 3.2 --- --- --- --- 0.7 19.1 53.5 277.9

Total Prec. (mm)

96.2 74.9 79.4 84.2 97.7 91.3 74.1 92.7 96.8 87.7 97.7 100.3 1072.9

Weather extremes for the Summerside Airport station recorded during the period of record

(1943 to 2010) as listed below:

• Extreme Maximum Temperature: 33.3 C on August 13, 1944;

• Extreme Minimum Temperature: -29.9 C on Jan. 18, 1982;

• Extreme daily rainfall: 111.8 mm on Aug. 13, 1948;

• Extreme daily snowfall: 53.6 cm on Jan. 1, 1961;

• Extreme snow depth: 114 cm on Feb. 14, 1978;

• Maximum hourly wind speed: 121 km/h on Jan. 20, 1961;

• Extreme wind gust: 145 km/h on Feb. 2, 1976;

• Extreme humidex value: 41.7 on July 7, 1989;

• Average date of last spring frost: May 24th;

• Average date of first fall frost: Oct. 8th; and

• Average length of frost free period: 141 days

5.4 Terrestrial Environment

No rare or native plant species are suspected to be present on the subject site as the property

has been used for agricultural purposes since at least 1935. All development will be located

within the farmland area with no impact to the hedgerows that border the subject site on the

eastern boundary.

Page 24: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 19

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

5.5 Human Environment

An option to purchase the land from Heritage Farms to PEI Department of Transportation,

Infrastructure and Energy was secured in 2017. The site has been used for agricultural

purposes since at least 1935 with the land being farmed primarily for potato crops on a four (4)

year rotation.

PEIDCLE contacted the Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat, staff of which were not aware of any

archaeological or traditional Mi’kmaq use of the subject project and had no evidence that the

proposed project would have an adverse impact of any asserted Aboriginal or treaty rights.

6.0 PROJECT INTERACTIONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT (VECS TABLE)

A qualitative review of the potential interaction that the construction and operation of the

proposed Agricultural Grain Crops storage would have on the specific VECs that are of

particular value or interest to regulatory agencies, the public and other stakeholders are outlined

in Table 6.1.

The residual impacts rating for each of the VECs assessed is based on the following

significance:

0 = No residual impacts expected as the environmental effects are not considered

significant.

1= Insignificant - interaction occurs however based on the mitigation in place the

environmental effects are not consider significant.

2= Significant - interaction could result in an environmental effect even with

mitigation in place.

Table 6-1. Proposed Project - VECs Interactions and Mitigation

VECs Description of Effects Required Mitigation

Residual

Impact

Rating

Land Use Project footprint is consistent with

existing land use in the surrounding

area. Current land use is vacant

undeveloped (farmland). Adjacent and

None 0

Page 25: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 20

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

VECs Description of Effects Required Mitigation

Residual

Impact

Rating

surrounding land use consists of a mix

of commercial, residential and

agricultural. The subject site for

expansion has historically been utilized

as farmland dating back to 1935.

Groundwater

Resources

Existing water supply well to be used.

Potential for petroleum spills during fuel

delivery, leakage from storage tank or

escape from vehicles accessing the

site.

All petroleum products will

be stored in secured ASTs

with secondary containment

or appropriate containers.

An emergency spill kit will

be maintained on site.

1

Terrestrial

Environment

Disturbance of the terrestrial

environment will be minimal and limited

to the previously disturbed areas (i.e.,

farmland).

None 0

Air Quality Excess noise and dust caused for the

short term and locally during the

construction phase of the development.

Excess noise caused for short

durations during operation of the

facility. This includes transfer to and

from site of agricultural crop products

during peak seasons and short periods

during off-season. The operation of

ventilation and dryer fans can also

result in excessive noise.

Air Quality may be impacted by a fire in

the crop storage facilities.

Appropriate noise

suppression, dust control

as required under the

contractor’s EPP that

adheres to the applicable

PEIDCLE and PEI

Occupational Health and

Safety Regulations.

A soil berm to be installed

along the eastern and

northeast boundary of the

newly acquired property.

Air quality can be mitigated

by proper storage and

installation of updated dust

collection to be installed in

the new plant.

1

First Nation/

Indigenous

Peoples and

Communities

No project interaction with Indigenous

resources or traditional land use are

anticipated. PEIDCLE contacted the

Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat, staff of

which were not aware of any

archaeological or traditional Mi’kmaq

use of the subject project and had no

None 0

Page 26: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 21

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

VECs Description of Effects Required Mitigation

Residual

Impact

Rating

evidence that the proposed project

would have an adverse impact of any

asserted Aboriginal or treaty rights.

Health and

Safety

Project activities during construction

and operation (including accidents,

potential malfunctions and unplanned

events) could result in risk to the public

or workers if not carried out in a safe

and proper manner. The construction

and operation of the facility is subject to

the PEI Occupational Health and Safety

regulations. Proper safety procedures

must be followed during the duration of

the project as per applicable provincial

and federal regulations.

Proper safety procedures

must be followed during the

duration of the project as

per applicable municipal,

provincial and federal

regulations. In addition, the

facility will be constructed

and operated following all

applicable provincial and

federal codes (including

PEIGEC Emergency

Response Plan).

1

Road

Transportation

During construction, materials and

supplies will be transported to the site

with construction workers traveling to

the site by construction and passenger

vehicles.

During operation, fleet vehicles

including transport trucks will be

accessing the facility on a regular

basis.

During construction and

operation, the project site

will be accessed by existing

roadways with all facility

related vehicles obeying

provincial traffic laws and

corresponding Transport

Canada Regulations.

1

Archaeology,

Palaeontology

and/or Heritage

Resources

PEIDCLE contacted the Aboriginal

Affairs Secretariat, staff of which were

not aware of any archaeological or

traditional Mi’kmaq use of the subject

project and had no evidence that the

proposed project would have an

adverse impact of any asserted

Aboriginal or treaty rights.

None 0

Environmental

Effects

Environmental effects refer to forces of

nature (i.e., severe weather, earth

quakes, etc.) that could affect the

project physically or hamper

construction or operation of the facility.

Compliance with provincial

and federal codes,

standards and best

management practices that

inherently account for the

potential environmental

effects on the project.

1

Significance of residual impacts rates as follows: 0 = None; 1= Insignificant; 2 = Significant.

Page 27: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 22

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

7.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The EIA for the proposed project was completed as per Section 9 of the PEI EPA. The EIA

evaluated the potential environmental effects of the proposed project taking into consideration

all activities required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the facility. As part of

the Project Description the following mitigation and environmental monitoring elements will be

adhered to during the construction and operation of the proposed facility, including:

Mitigation

• During construction and operation all provincial and federal codes, standards and best

management practices will be followed;

• During construction and operation (including accidents, potential malfunctions and

unplanned events) the contractors Environmental Protection Plan and PEIGEC ERP will

be adhered to;

• During operation mitigation for hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste will be conducted as outlined in Tables 3.1 and 3.2 in Sections 3.2.6 and 3.2.7 of this report; and

• An earthen berm will be constructed around the perimeter along the north and east

boundaries to reduce noise levels and improve the aesthetics experienced on adjacent

properties.

Environmental Monitoring

• During the construction period personnel, the PEIGEC’s project manager will conduct

regular environmental monitoring site inspections to ensure all construction components

adhere to the provincial and federal regulations and codes as well as the

procedures/controls outlined in the contractors Environmental Protection Plan.

Based on the information obtained during the preparation of this Project Description, it can be

concluded that the potential environmental effects of the proposed project on all valued

environmental components (VECs - listed in Section 6 of this report) would not be significant

during the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed facility with the planned

mitigation and monitoring elements in place. Consequently, it is recommended that the

proposed project should proceed as described and outlined in this report.

Page 28: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 23

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

8.0 CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of PEI Grain Elevator Corporation. The

report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of

Joose Environmental Consulting Inc., DE Jardine Consulting and PEI Grain Elevator

Corporation. Any uses which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions

made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Joose Environmental accepts no

responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or

actions taken based on this report.

Some of the information presented in this report was provided through existing documents and

interviews. Although attempts were made, whenever possible, to obtain a minimum of two

confirmatory sources of information, we in certain instances have been required to assume that

the information provided is accurate.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by

trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and

scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. The conclusions and

recommendations presented represent the best judgement of Joose Environmental based on

the data obtained during the assessment. Due to the nature of the assessment and the limited

data available, Joose Environmental cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental

liabilities. Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should not be construed

as legal advice.

This report was prepared by Mr. Don Jardine, B.Sc. and Mr. Peter H. Joostema, FEC, P. Eng.,

CESA. We trust this report contains the information required at this time, and we are available at

your convenience should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

JOOSE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC. and DE JARDINE CONSULTING

________________________________ _________________________

Peter H. Joostema, FEC, P. Eng., CESA Don Jardine, B.Sc.

Principal Environmental Engineer Senior Environmental Scientist

[email protected]

Page 29: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 24

©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

9.0 REFERENCES

Canada’s Historic Places - http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/register-repertoire.aspx Environment Canada - Atmospheric Environmental Services. Summerside Airport Climate Normal for period 1981 - 2010. Government of Canada - Species at Risk: www.sararegistry.gc.ca

Historical Places of Prince Edward Island - http://www.gov.pe.ca/hpo/ Prest, V. K. (1973) Surficial Deposits of Prince Edward Island - Geology Survey of Canada Map 1366A. Soil of Prince Edward Island - Research Branch Agriculture Canada (1988). Van de Pol, H.W. (1983) Geology of Prince Edward Island - Department of Energy and Forestry, Energy and Minerals Branch. Information from Other Sources PEI Department of Transportation, Infrastructure and Energy:

- Mr. Alan Aitken, P. Eng., Traffic Operations Engineer - Brenda Boyle, Environment and Lands

PEI Department of Environment, Labour and Justice:

- Mr. Dale Thompson, Environmental Assessment Officer - Mr. Greg Wilson, Manager Environmental Land Management

PEI Grain Elevator Corporation;

- Mr. Neil Campbell - Mr. Wade Waddell

Page 30: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018

APPENDIX A Figure and Drawing

Page 31: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description
Page 32: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description
Page 33: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018

APPENDIX B

MSDS Information

Page 34: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 1 of 4

Material Safety Data Sheet

1 - Chemical Product and Company Identification

Manufacturer: WD-40 Company Address: 1061 Cudahy Place (92110) P.O. Box 80607 San Diego, California, USA 92138 –0607 Telephone: Emergency only: 1-888-324-7596 (PROSAR) Information: 1-888-324-7596 Chemical Spills: 1-800-424-9300 (Chemtrec) 1-703-527-3887 (International Calls)

Chemical Name: Organic Mixture Trade Name: WD-40 Bulk Liquid Product Use: Lubricant, Penetrant, Drives Out Moisture, Removes and Protects Surfaces From Corrosion MSDS Date Of Preparation: 3/11/10

2 – Hazards Identification

Emergency Overview: DANGER! Harmful or fatal if swallowed. Combustible Liquid. If swallowed, may be aspirated and cause lung damage. May cause eye irritation. Avoid eye contact. Use with adequate ventilation. Keep away from heat, sparks and all other sources of ignition. Symptoms of Overexposure: Inhalation: High concentrations may cause nasal and respiratory irritation and central nervous system effects such as headache, dizziness and nausea. Intentional abuse may be harmful or fatal. Skin Contact: Prolonged and/or repeated contact may produce mild irritation and defatting with possible dermatitis. Eye Contact: Contact may be irritating to eyes. May cause redness and tearing. Ingestion: This product has low oral toxicity. Swallowing may cause gastrointestinal irritation, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. This product is an aspiration hazard. If swallowed, can enter the lungs and may cause chemical pneumonitis, severe lung damage and death. Chronic Effects: None expected. Medical Conditions Aggravated by Exposure: Preexisting eye, skin and respiratory conditions may be aggravated by exposure. Suspected Cancer Agent:

Yes No X

3 - Composition/Information on Ingredients

Ingredient CAS # Weight Percent

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 64742-47-8 45-50

Petroleum Base Oil 64742-58-1 64742-53-6 64742-56-9 64742-65-0

<25

LVP Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 64742-47-8 12-18

Surfactant Proprietary <2

Non-Hazardous Ingredients Mixture <10

See Section 8 for Exposure Limits 4 – First Aid Measures

Ingestion (Swallowed): Aspiration Hazard. DO NOT induce vomiting. Call physician, poison control center or the WD-40 Safety Hotline at 1-888-324-7596 immediately.

Page 35: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 2 of 4

Eye Contact: Flush thoroughly with water. Remove contact lenses if present after the first 5 minutes and continue flushing for several more minutes. Get medical attention if irritation persists. Skin Contact: Wash with soap and water. If irritation develops and persists, get medical attention. Inhalation (Breathing): If irritation is experienced, move to fresh air. Get medical attention if irritation or other

symptoms develop and persist.

5 – Fire Fighting Measures

Extinguishing Media: Use water fog, dry chemical, carbon dioxide or foam. Do not use water jet or flooding amounts of water. Burning product will float on the surface and spread fire. Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Firefighters should always wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus and full protective clothing. Cool fire-exposed containers with water. Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Combustible liquid and vapor. Vapors are heavier than air and may travel along surfaces to remote ignition sources and flash back.

6 – Accidental Release Measures

Wear appropriate protective clothing (see Section 8). Eliminate all sources of ignition and ventilate area. Contain and collect liquid with an inert absorbent and place in a container for disposal. Clean spill area thoroughly. Report spills to authorities as required.

7 – Handling and Storage

Handling: Avoid contact with eyes. Avoid prolonged contact with skin. Avoid breathing vapors or aerosols. Use with adequate ventilation. Keep away from heat, sparks, hot surfaces and open flames. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling. Keep containers closed when not in use. Keep out of the reach of children. Storage: Store in a cool, well-ventilated area, away from incompatible materials. NFPA 30 Class II Liquid.

8 – Exposure Controls/Personal Protection

Chemical Occupational Exposure Limits

Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 1200 mg/m3 TWA (manufacturer recommended)

Petroleum Base Oil

5 mg/m3 (inhalable) TWA 5 mg/m3 TWA OSHA PEL

LVP Aliphatic Hydrocarbon 1200 mg/m3 TWA (manufacturer recommended)

Surfactant None Established

Non-Hazardous Ingredients None Established

The Following Controls are Recommended for Normal Consumer Use of this Product Engineering Controls: Use in a well-ventilated area. Personal Protection: Eye Protection: Avoid eye contact. Safety glasses or goggles recommended. Skin Protection: Avoid prolonged skin contact. Chemical resistant gloves recommended for operations where skin contact is likely. Respiratory Protection: None needed for normal use with adequate ventilation. For Bulk Processing or Workplace Use the Following Controls are Recommended Engineering Controls: Use adequate general and local exhaust ventilation to maintain exposure levels below that occupational exposure limits. Personal Protection: Eye Protection: Safety goggles recommended where eye contact is possible. Skin Protection: Wear chemical resistant gloves. Respiratory Protection: None required if ventilation is adequate. If the occupational exposure limits are exceeded, wear a NIOSH approved respirator. Respirator selection and use should be based on contaminant type, form and concentration. Follow OSHA 1910.134, ANSI Z88.2 and good Industrial Hygiene practice. Work/Hygiene Practices: Wash with soap and water after handling.

Page 36: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 3 of 4

9 – Physical and Chemical Properties

Boiling Point: 361 - 369 F (183 - 187°C)

Specific Gravity: 0.8 – 0.82 @ 60 F

Solubility in Water: Insoluble pH: Not Applicable

Vapor Pressure: 1 psi @38 C (100 F) ASTM D323

Vapor Density: Greater than 1

Percent Volatile: 70-75% VOC: 412 grams/liter (49.5%)

Coefficient of Water/Oil Distribution:

Not Determined Appearance/Odor Light amber liquid/mild odor

Flash Point: 122 F (49°C) Tag Open Cup

Flammable Limits: (Solvent Portion)

LEL: 0.6% UEL: 8.0%

Pour Point: -63 C (-81.4 F ) ASTM D-97

Kinematic Viscosity: 2.79-2.96cSt @ 100 F

10 – Stability and Reactivity

Stability: Stable Hazardous Polymerization: Will not occur. Conditions to Avoid: Avoid heat, sparks, flames and other sources of ignition. Incompatibilities: Strong oxidizing agents. Hazardous Decomposition Products: Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.

11 – Toxicological Information

The oral toxicity of this product is estimated to be greater than 5,000 mg/kg based on an assessment of the ingredients. This product is not classified as toxic by established criteria. It is an aspiration hazard. None of the components of this product is listed as a carcinogen or suspected carcinogen or is considered a reproductive hazard.

12 – Ecological Information

No data is currently available.

13 - Disposal Considerations

If this product becomes a waste, it would be expected to meet the criteria of a RCRA ignitable hazardous waste (D001). However, it is the responsibility of the generator to determine at the time of disposal the proper classification and method of disposal. Dispose in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.

14 – Transportation Information_

DOT Surface Shipping Description: Excepted from Hazmat (49CFR 173.150 (F)) in non-bulk packagings. Bulk Packagings: NA1993, Combustible Liquid, n.o.s. (contains Petroleum Distillates), PG III IMDG Shipping Description: UN1268, Petroleum Distillates, n.o.s. 3, PG III

15 – Regulatory Information

U.S. Federal Regulations: CERCLA 103 Reportable Quantity: This product is not subject to CERCLA reporting requirements, however, oil spills are reportable to the National Response Center under the Clean Water Act and many states have more stringent release reporting requirements. Report spills required under federal, state and local regulations. SARA TITLE III: Hazard Category For Section 311/312: Acute Health, Fire Hazard Section 313 Toxic Chemicals: This product contains the following chemicals subject to SARA Title III Section 313 Reporting requirements: None Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances (TPQ): None

Page 37: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 4 of 4

EPA Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Status: All of the components of this product are listed on the TSCA inventory California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65): This product does not contain chemicals regulated under California Proposition 65. VOC Regulations: This product complies with the consumer product VOC limits of CARB, the US EPA and states adopting the OTC VOC rules. Canadian Environmental Protection Act: One of the components is listed on the NDSL. All of the other ingredients are listed on the Canadian Domestic Substances List or exempt from notification. Canadian WHMIS Classification: Class B-3 (Combustible Liquid) This MSDS has been prepared according to the criteria of the Controlled Products Regulation (CPR) and the MSDS contains all of the information required by the CPR.

16 – Other Information:

HMIS Hazard Rating: Health – 1 (slight hazard), Fire Hazard – 2 (moderate hazard), Reactivity – 0 (minimal hazard) Revision Date: March 2010 Supercedes: January 2010

SIGNATURE: TITLE: Director of Global Quality Assurance REVISION DATE: March 2010 SUPERSEDES: August 2009

Page 38: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 1/6

Safety Data Sheet

43.0

1 Identification

· Product identifier

· Trade name: Lubex FG

· Article number: FG001845

· Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet· Manufacturer:

Irving Blending & Packaging, 555Courtenay Causeway Saint John, NB E2L 4E6Canada

Emergency telephone number:24 Hours: 1.506.648.3060

2 Hazard(s) identification

· Classification of the substance or mixtureThe product is not classified according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).

· Label elements· GHS label elements Void

· Hazard pictograms Void

· Signal word Void

· Hazard statements Void

· Classification system:· NFPA ratings (scale 0 - 4)

01

0

Health = 0

Fire = 1

Reactivity = 0

· HMIS-ratings (scale 0 - 4)

HEALTH

FIRE

REACTIVITY

0

1

0

Health = 0

Fire = 1

Reactivity = 0

3 Composition/information on ingredients

· Chemical characterization: Mixtures· Description: Mixture of the substances listed below with nonhazardous additions.

· Dangerous components:

97675-24-6 Benzene, C9-13-alkyl derivs., distn. residues, sulfonated, calcium salts 2.5-<10% w/w

68584-23-6 C10-C16 alkylbenzenesulfonic acid calcium salt 2.5-<10% w/w

4 First-aid measures

· Description of first aid measures· General information: No special measures required.

· After inhalation: Supply fresh air; consult doctor in case of complaints.

· After skin contact: Generally the product does not irritate the skin.(Contd. on page 2)

CA

Page 39: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 2/6

Safety Data Sheet

Trade name: Lubex FG

(Contd. of page 1)

43.0

· After eye contact: Rinse opened eye for several minutes under running water.

· After swallowing: If symptoms persist consult doctor.

· Information for doctor:· Most important symptoms and effects, both acute and delayed No further relevant information available.

· Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment neededNo further relevant information available.

5 Fire-fighting measures

· Extinguishing media· Suitable extinguishing agents: Use fire fighting measures that suit the environment.

· Special hazards arising from the substance or mixture No further relevant information available.

· Advice for firefighters· Protective equipment: No special measures required.

6 Accidental release measures

· Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures Not required.

· Environmental precautions: Do not allow to enter sewers/ surface or ground water.

· Methods and material for containment and cleaning up:Absorb with liquid-binding material (sand, diatomite, acid binders, universal binders, sawdust).

· Reference to other sectionsSee Section 7 for information on safe handling.

See Section 8 for information on personal protection equipment.

See Section 13 for disposal information.

7 Handling and storage

· Handling:· Precautions for safe handling No special measures required.

· Information about protection against explosions and fires: No special measures required.

· Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities· Storage:· Requirements to be met by storerooms and receptacles: No special requirements.

· Information about storage in one common storage facility: Not required.

· Further information about storage conditions: None.

· Specific end use(s) No further relevant information available.

* 8 Exposure controls/personal protection

· Additional information about design of technical systems: No further data; see item 7.

· Control parameters· Components with limit values that require monitoring at the workplace:

The product does not contain any relevant quantities of materials with critical values that have to be monitored at

the workplace.

· Additional information: The lists that were valid during the creation were used as basis.(Contd. on page 3)

CA

Page 40: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 3/6

Safety Data Sheet

Trade name: Lubex FG

(Contd. of page 2)

43.0

· Exposure controls· Personal protective equipment:· General protective and hygienic measures:

The usual precautionary measures for handling chemicals should be followed.

· Breathing equipment: Not required.

· Protection of hands:The glove material has to be impermeable and resistant to the product/ the substance/ the preparation.

Due to missing tests no recommendation to the glove material can be given for the product/ the preparation/ the

chemical mixture.

Selection of the glove material on consideration of the penetration times, rates of diffusion and the degradation

· Material of glovesThe selection of the suitable gloves does not only depend on the material, but also on further marks of quality and

varies from manufacturer to manufacturer. As the product is a preparation of several substances, the resistance of

the glove material can not be calculated in advance and has therefore to be checked prior to the application.

· Penetration time of glove materialThe exact break through time has to be found out by the manufacturer of the protective gloves and has to be

observed.

· Eye protection: Goggles recommended during refilling.

* 9 Physical and chemical properties

· Information on basic physical and chemical properties· General Information· Appearance:

Form: Semi-Solid

Color: Beige

· Odor: Petroleum-like

· Odor threshold: Not determined.

· pH-value: Not determined.

· Change in conditionMelting point/Melting range: Undetermined.

Boiling point/Boiling range: Undetermined.

· Flash point: 250 °C

· Flammability (solid, gaseous): Not applicable.

· Ignition temperature: > 315 °C

· Decomposition temperature: Not determined.

· Auto igniting: Product is not selfigniting.

· Danger of explosion: Product does not present an explosion hazard.

· Explosion limits:Lower: Not determined.

Upper: Not determined.

· Vapor pressure: Not determined.

· Density at 20 °C: 1.12268 g/cm³

· Relative density Not determined.

· Vapor density Not determined.

· Evaporation rate Not determined.

(Contd. on page 4)

CA

Page 41: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 4/6

Safety Data Sheet

Trade name: Lubex FG

(Contd. of page 3)

43.0

· Solubility in / Miscibility withWater: Not miscible or difficult to mix.

· Partition coefficient (n-octanol/water): Not determined.

· Viscosity:Dynamic: Not determined.

Kinematic: Not determined.

· Solvent content:Organic solvents: 0.5 %

Solids content: 17.9 %

· Other information No further relevant information available.

10 Stability and reactivity

· Reactivity No further relevant information available.

· Chemical stability· Thermal decomposition / conditions to be avoided: No decomposition if used according to specifications.

· Possibility of hazardous reactions No dangerous reactions known.

· Conditions to avoid No further relevant information available.

· Incompatible materials: No further relevant information available.

· Hazardous decomposition products: No dangerous decomposition products known.

* 11 Toxicological information

· Information on toxicological effects· Acute toxicity:

· LD/LC50 values that are relevant for classification:

ATE (Acute Toxicity Estimates)

Oral LD50 64725 mg/kg (rat)

Dermal LD50 2649 mg/kg (rabbit)

· Primary irritant effect:· on the skin: No irritant effect.

· on the eye: No irritating effect.

· Sensitization: No sensitizing effects known.

· Additional toxicological information:The product is not subject to classification according to internally approved calculation methods for

preparations:

When used and handled according to specifications, the product does not have any harmful effects according to

our experience and the information provided to us.

· Carcinogenic categories

· IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)

None of the ingredients is listed.

· NTP (National Toxicology Program)

None of the ingredients is listed.

CA

(Contd. on page 5)

Page 42: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 5/6

Safety Data Sheet

Trade name: Lubex FG

(Contd. of page 4)

43.0

12 Ecological information

· Toxicity· Aquatic toxicity: No further relevant information available.

· Persistence and degradability No further relevant information available.

· Behavior in environmental systems:· Bioaccumulative potential No further relevant information available.

· Mobility in soil No further relevant information available.

· Additional ecological information:· General notes:

Water hazard class 1 (Self-assessment): slightly hazardous for water

Do not allow undiluted product or large quantities of it to reach ground water, water course or sewage system.

· Results of PBT and vPvB assessment· PBT: Not applicable.

· vPvB: Not applicable.

· Other adverse effects No further relevant information available.

13 Disposal considerations

· Waste treatment methods· Recommendation: Smaller quantities can be disposed of with household waste.

· Uncleaned packagings:· Recommendation: Disposal must be made according to official regulations.

14 Transport information

· UN-Number· DOT, TDG, ADN, IMDG, IATA not regulated

· UN proper shipping name· DOT, TDG, ADN, IMDG, IATA not regulated

· Transport hazard class(es)

· DOT, TDG, ADN, IMDG, IATA· Class not regulated

· Packing group· DOT, TDG, IMDG, IATA not regulated

· Environmental hazards:· Marine pollutant: No

· Special precautions for user Not applicable.

· Transport in bulk according to Annex II ofMARPOL73/78 and the IBC Code Not applicable.

· UN "Model Regulation": not regulated

CA

(Contd. on page 6)

Page 43: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Page 6/6

Safety Data Sheet

Trade name: Lubex FG

(Contd. of page 5)

43.0

* 15 Regulatory information

· Safety, health and environmental regulations/legislation specific for the substance or mixture· Sara

· Section 355 (extremely hazardous substances):

None of the ingredients is listed.

· Section 313 (Specific toxic chemical listings):

None of the ingredients is listed.

· TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act):

All ingredients are listed.

· Canadian substance listings:

· Canadian Domestic Substances List (DSL)

All ingredients are listed.

· Canadian Ingredient Disclosure list (limit 0.1%)

None of the ingredients is listed.

· Canadian Ingredient Disclosure list (limit 1%)

None of the ingredients is listed.

· GHS label elements Void

· Hazard pictograms Void

· Signal word Void

· Hazard statements Void

· Chemical safety assessment: A Chemical Safety Assessment has not been carried out.

16 Other information

· Abbreviations and acronyms:IMDG: International Maritime Code for Dangerous Goods

DOT: US Department of Transportation

IATA: International Air Transport Association

EINECS: European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical SubstancesELINCS: European List of Notified Chemical Substances

CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (division of the American Chemical Society)NFPA: National Fire Protection Association (USA)

HMIS: Hazardous Materials Identification System (USA)

LC50: Lethal concentration, 50 percent

LD50: Lethal dose, 50 percent

PBT: Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic

vPvB: very Persistent and very Bioaccumulative

· * Data compared to the previous version altered.

CA

The information in the sheet was written based on the best knowledge and experience currently available. Information contained herein was obtained from sources considered technically accurate and reliable. While every effort has been made to ensure full disclosure of product hazards, in some cases data is not available and is so stated. Since conditions of actual product use are beyond control of the supplier, it is assumed that users of this material have been fully trained according to the requirements of all applicable legislation and regulatory instruments. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made and supplier will not be liable for any losses, injuries or consequential damages which may result from the use of or reliance on any information contained in this document. Creation Date: Feb 1 2017Revision: 00Effective Date: Feb 1, 2017

Page 44: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Safety Data SheetSafety Data Sheet according to Regulation (EC) No.

1907/2006 (REACH)

SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking

1.1. Product identifier

Substance name: Fuels, dieselOther means of identification Auto Diesel Oil (ADO); Ultra Low Sulphur Diesel (ULSD);

Distillates (petroleum), hydrotreated middle; Finished Gas Oil(FGO); Heating Oil

Safety Data Sheet Number: 814603MARPOL Annex I Category Gas Oils, Including Ship's Bunkers

REACH Registration Number: 01-2119484664-27-0006

1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against

Relevant identified uses Transportation FuelHeating Oil

Uses advised against Uses other than those covered by the exposure scenariosappended to this Safety Data Sheet are not supported.

1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet

Manufacturer/Supplier Irving Oil Whitegate Refinery LimitedWhitegate, Midleton, Co. Cork, Ireland

SDS Information Email: [email protected]

1.4. Emergency telephone number + 353 21 4622 200

SECTION 2: Hazard identification

2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture

CLP Classification (EC No 1272/2008)H226 - Flammable liquids -- Category 3H304 -- Aspiration Hazard -- Category 1H315 -- Skin corrosion/irritation -- Category 2H332 -- Acute toxicity, Inhalation -- Category 4H351 -- Carcinogenicity -- Category 2H373 -- Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure) -- Category 2H411 -- Hazardous to the aquatic environment, chronic toxicity -- Category 2

2.2. Label elements

DANGER

Flammable liquid and vapourMay be fatal if swallowed and enters airwaysCauses skin irritationHarmful if inhaledSuspected of causing cancerMay cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure

Page 45: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 2/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects

P210 - Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smokingP260 - Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/sprayP273 - Avoid release to the environmentP280 - Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protectionP301 + P310 - IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physicianP331 - Do NOT induce vomiting

2.3. Other hazards

Electrostatic charge may be generated during pumping and other operationsDoes not meet the criteria for persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) or very persistent, very bioaccumulative (vPvB)substances.

SECTION 3: Composition/information on ingredients

3.2. Mixtures

Chemical Name CASRN EINECS REACH RegistrationNo.

Concentration¹ Classification²

Fuels, diesel 68334-30-5 269-822-7 01-2119484664-27 90-100 H226,H304,H315,H332,H351,H373,H411

Fatty acids, C14-18 andC16-18-unsaturated,methyl esters

67762-26-9 267-007-0 01-2119471662-36 0-10 -

Fatty acids, C16-18 andC18-unsaturated, methylesters

67762-38-3 267-015-4 01-2119471664-32 0-10 -

Naphthalene 91-20-3 202-049-5 Not applicable <1 H351,H302,H410

¹ All concentrations are percent by weight unless ingredient is a gas. Gas concentrations are in percent by volume.² Regulation EC 1272/2008.

SECTION 4: First aid measures

4.1. Description of first aid measures

Eye Contact: If irritation or redness develops from exposure, flush eyes with clean water. If symptoms persist, seek medicalattention.

Skin Contact: Remove contaminated shoes and clothing, and flush affected area(s) with large amounts of water. If skinsurface is damaged, apply a clean dressing and seek medical attention. If skin surface is not damaged, cleanse affectedarea(s) thoroughly by washing with mild soap and water or a waterless hand cleaner. If irritation or redness develops, seekmedical attention. Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. If product is injected into or under the skin, or into any part of thebody, regardless of the appearance of the wound or its size, the individual should be evaluated immediately by a physician.(see Note to Physician)

Inhalation: If respiratory symptoms or other symptoms of exposure develop, move victim away from source of exposure andinto fresh air in a position comfortable for breathing. If symptoms persist, seek immediate medical attention. If victim is notbreathing, clear airway and immediately begin artificial respiration. If breathing difficulties develop, oxygen should beadministered by qualified personnel. Seek immediate medical attention.

Ingestion: Aspiration hazard: Do not induce vomiting or give anything by mouth because this material can enter the lungs andcause severe lung damage. If victim is drowsy or unconscious and vomiting, place on the left side with the head down. Ifpossible, do not leave victim unattended and observe closely for adequacy of breathing. Seek medical attention.

4.2. Most important symptoms and effects, both acute and delayed

While significant vapour concentrations are not likely, high concentrations can cause minor respiratory irritation, headache,drowsiness, dizziness, loss of coordination, disorientation and fatigue. Ingestion can cause irritation of the digestive tract,nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Prolonged or repeated contact may dry skin and cause irritation.

Page 46: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 3/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

4.3. Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed

Notes to Physician: When using high-pressure equipment, injection of product under the skin can occur. In this case, thecasualty should be sent immediately to the hospital. Do not wait for symptoms to develop. High-pressure hydrocarbon injectioninjuries may produce substantial necrosis of underlying tissue despite an innocuous appearing external wound. These injuriesoften require extensive emergency surgical debridement and all injuries should be evaluated by a specialist in order to assessthe extent of injury. Early surgical treatment within the first few hours may significantly reduce the ultimate extent of injury.

SECTION 5: Firefighting measures

5.1. Extinguishing mediaDry chemical, carbon dioxide, or foam is recommended. Water spray is recommended to cool or protect exposed materials orstructures. Carbon dioxide can displace oxygen. Use caution when applying carbon dioxide in confined spaces. Simultaneoususe of foam and water on the same surface is to be avoided as water destroys the foam. Water may be ineffective forextinguishment, unless used under favorable conditions by experienced fire fighters.

5.2. Special hazards arising from the substance or mixture

Unusual Fire & Explosion Hazards: Flammable. This material can be ignited by heat, sparks, flames, or other sources ofignition (e.g., static electricity, pilot lights, mechanical/electrical equipment, and electronic devices such as cell phones,computers, calculators, and pagers which have not been certified as intrinsically safe) Vapours may travel considerabledistances to a source of ignition where they can ignite, flash back, or explode. May create vapour/air explosion hazard indoors,in confined spaces, outdoors, or in sewers. This product will float and can be reignited on surface water. Vapours are heavierthan air and can accumulate in low areas. If container is not properly cooled, it can rupture in the heat of a fire.

Hazardous Combustion Products: Combustion may yield smoke, carbon monoxide, and other products of incompletecombustion. Oxides of nitrogen and sulphur may also be formed.

5.3. Special protective actions for fire-fighters

For fires beyond the initial stage, emergency responders in the immediate hazard area should wear protective clothing. Whenthe potential chemical hazard is unknown, in enclosed or confined spaces, a self contained breathing apparatus should beworn. In addition, wear other appropriate protective equipment as conditions warrant (see Section 8) Isolate the hazard areaand deny entry to unnecessary and unprotected personnel Stop spill/release if it can be done safely Move undamagedcontainers from immediate hazard area if it can be done safely Water spray may be useful in minimizing or dispersing vapoursand to protect personnel Avoid spreading burning liquid with water used for cooling purposes Cool equipment exposed to firewith water, if it can be done safely

See Section 9 for Flammable Properties including Flash Point and Flammable (Explosive) Limits

SECTION 6: Accidental release measures

6.1. Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures

Flammable. Spillages of liquid product will create a fire hazard and may form an explosive atmosphere. Keep all sources ofignition and hot metal surfaces away from spill/release if safe to do so. The use of explosion-proof electrical equipment isrecommended. Keep all sources of ignition away from spill/release. Stay upwind and away from spill/release. Avoid directcontact with material. For large spillages, notify persons down wind of the spill/release, isolate immediate hazard area andkeep unauthorised personnel out. Wear appropriate protective equipment, including respiratory protection, as conditionswarrant (see Section 8). See Sections 2 and 7 for additional information on hazards and precautionary measures.

6.2. Environmental precautions

Stop and contain spill/release if it can be done safely. Prevent spilled material from entering sewers, storm drains, otherunauthorised drainage systems, and natural waterways. Use foam on spills to minimise vapours Use water sparingly tominimize environmental contamination and reduce disposal requirements. If spill occurs on water notify appropriate authoritiesand advise shipping of any hazard.

6.3. Methods and material for containment and cleaning up

Notify relevant authorities in accordance with all applicable regulations. Immediate cleanup of any spill is recommended. Dikefar ahead of spill for later recovery or disposal. Absorb spill with inert material such as sand or vermiculite, and place in suitable

Page 47: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 4/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

container for disposal. If spilled on water remove with appropriate methods (e.g. skimming, booms or absorbents). In case ofsoil contamination, remove contaminated soil for remediation or disposal, in accordance with local regulations.

Recommended measures are based on the most likely spillage scenarios for this material; however local conditions andregulations may influence or limit the choice of appropriate actions to be taken.

SECTION 7: Handling and storage

7.1. Precautions for safe handling

Obtain special instructions before use. Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. Keep awayfrom heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking. Take precautionary measures againststatic discharge. Use only non-sparking tools. Do not breathe vapour or mist. Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. Wash thoroughly after handling. Use good personalhygiene practices and wear appropriate personal protective equipment (see section 8).

Flammable. Open container slowly to relieve any pressure. May vaporize easily at ambient temperatures. The vapour isheavier than air and may create an explosive mixture of vapor and air. Beware of accumulation in confined spaces and lowlying areas. Electrostatic charge may accumulate and create a hazardous condition when handling or processing this material.To avoid fire or explosion, dissipate static electricity during transfer by grounding and bonding containers and equipment beforetransferring material. The use of explosion-proof electrical equipment is recommended and may be required (see appropriatefire codes for specific bonding/grounding requirements). Do not enter confined spaces such as tanks or pits without followingproper entry procedures. Do not wear contaminated clothing or shoes. Keep contaminated clothing away from sources ofignition such as sparks or open flames.

For use as a motor fuel only. Do not use as a solvent due to its flammable and potentially toxic properties. Siphoning by mouthcan result in lung aspiration which can be harmful or fatal.

The use of hydrocarbon fuel in an area without adequate ventilation may result in hazardous levels of incomplete combustionproducts (e.g. carbon monoxide, oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, benzene and other hydrocarbons) and/or dangerously lowoxygen levels.

High pressure injection of hydrocarbon fuels, hydraulic oils or greases under the skin may have serious consequences eventhough no symptoms or injury may be apparent. This can happen accidentally when using high pressure equipment such ashigh pressure grease guns, fuel injection apparatus or from pinhole leaks in tubing of high pressure hydraulic oil equipment.

Diesel engine exhaust contains hazardous combustion products and has been identified as a cancer hazard. Exposure shouldbe minimized to reduce potential risk.

7.2. Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities

Keep container(s) tightly closed and properly labeled. Use and store this material in cool, dry, well-ventilated area away fromheat and all sources of ignition. Store only in approved containers. Post area "No Smoking or Open Flame." Keep away fromany incompatible material (see Section 10). Protect container(s) against physical damage.

"Empty" containers retain residue and may be dangerous. Do not pressurize, cut, weld, braze, solder, drill, grind, or exposesuch containers to heat, flame, sparks, or other sources of ignition. They may explode and cause injury or death. "Empty"drums should be completely drained, properly bunged, and promptly shipped to the supplier or a drum reconditioner. Allcontainers should be disposed of in an environmentally safe manner and in accordance with governmental regulations. Beforeworking on or in tanks which contain or have contained this material, refer to appropriate guidance pertaining to cleaning,repairing, welding, or other contemplated operations. Outdoor or detached storage is preferred. Indoor storage should meetCountry or Committee standards and appropriate fire codes.

7.3. Specific end use(s)

Refer to supplemental exposure scenarios if attached.

SECTION 8: Exposure controls/personal protection

8.1. Control parameters

Chemical Name ACGIH Ireland

Fuels, diesel TWA: 100 mg/m3 inhalable fraction andvapor

TWA: 100 mg/m3

STEL: 300 mg/m3

Occupational Exposure Limits

Page 48: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 5/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Skin

Naphthalene TWA: 10 ppmSkin

TWA: 10 ppmTWA: 50 mg/m3

STEL: 15 ppmSTEL: 75 mg/m3

STEL = Short Term Exposure Limit (15 minutes); TWA = Time Weighted Average (8 hours); --- = No Occupational Exposure Limit

Chemical Name ACGIH European Union

Naphthalene 1-Naphthol with hydrolysis plus 2-Naphthol withhydrolysis in : , end of shift (nonquantitative,

nonspecific)

---

Relevant DNEL and PNEC:

Environmental Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC): No information available

8.2. Exposure controls

Engineering controls: If current ventilation practices are not adequate to maintain airborne concentrations below theestablished exposure limits, additional engineering controls may be required.

Eye/Face Protection: The use of eye protection that meets or exceeds EN 166 is recommended to protect against potentialeye contact, irritation, or injury. Depending on conditions of use, close fitting eye protection and a face shield may benecessary.

Skin/Hand Protection: The use of gloves impervious to the specific material handled that comply with EN 374 is advised toprevent skin contact. Users should check with manufacturers to confirm the breakthrough performance of their products.Depending on exposure and use conditions, additional protection may be necessary to prevent skin contact including use ofitems such as chemical resistant boots, aprons, arm covers, hoods, coveralls, or encapsulated suits. Suggested protectivematerials: Nitrile

Respiratory Protection: Where there is potential for airborne exposure above the exposure limit an approved air purifyingrespirator equipped with Type A, organic gases and vapour filters (as specified by the manufacturer) may be used.

A respiratory protection programme that follows recommendations for the selection, use, care and maintenance of respiratoryprotective devices in EN 529:2005 should be followed whenever workplace conditions warrant a respirator's use. Air purifyingrespirators provide limited protection and cannot be used in atmospheres that exceed the maximum use concentration (asdirected by regulation or the manufacturer's instructions), in oxygen deficient (less than 19.5 percent oxygen) situations, orunder conditions that are immediately dangerous to life and health.

Other Protective Equipment: Eye wash and quick-drench shower facilities should be available in the work area. Thoroughlyclean shoes and wash contaminated clothing before reuse.

Environmental Exposure Controls: Refer to Sections 6, 7, 12 and 13.

Suggestions provided in this section for exposure control and specific types of protective equipment are based on readilyavailable information. Users should consult with the specific manufacturer to confirm the performance of their protectiveequipment. Specific situations may require consultation with industrial hygiene, safety, or engineering professionals.

SECTION 9: Physical and chemical properties

9.1. Information on basic physical and chemical properties

Data represent typical values and are not intended to be specifications. N/A = Not Applicable; N/D = Not Determined

Appearance: Clear red or yellow brown

Physical Form: Liquid

Biological Limit Values

Worker Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL) Consumer Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL) Inhalation: 68.3 mg/m3 Inhalation: 20 mg/m3

Dermal: 2.9 mg/kgbw/day Dermal: 1.3 mg/kgbw/day

Ingestion: Not applicable

Page 49: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 6/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Odour: Pungent Petroleum

Odour Threshold: N/D

pH: N/A

Melting/Freezing Point: N/D

Initial Boiling Point/Range: 180 - 390 °C

Flash Point: > 60 °C; (Closed Cup)

Evaporation Rate (nBuAc=1): N/D

Flammability (solid, gas): Combustible

Upper Explosive Limits (vol % in air): 5.0

Lower Explosive Limits (vol % in air): 0.5

Vapour Pressure: <0.1 kPa @20°C

Relative Vapour Density (air=1): >1

Relative Density (water=1): 0.82-0.88 @ 15°C

Solubility (ies): Insoluble in water

Partition Coefficient (n-octanol/water) (Kow): N/D

Auto-ignition Temperature: 250 °C

Decomposition Temperature: N/D

Viscosity: 4.8 mm²/s @ 20°C; 1.5-5.5 mm²/s @ 40°C

Explosive Properties: N/D

Oxidising Properties: N/D

9.2. Other information

Pour Point: -24 °C

SECTION 10: Stability and reactivity

10.1. Reactivity Not chemically reactive.

10.2. Chemical stability Stable under normal ambient and anticipated conditions of use.

10.3. Possibility of hazardous reactions Hazardous reactions not anticipated.

10.4. Conditions to avoid Avoid all possible sources of ignition.

10.5. Incompatible materials Avoid contact with strong oxidizing agents and strong reducingagents.

10.6. Hazardous decomposition products Not anticipated under normal conditions of use.

SECTION 11: Toxicological information

11.1. Information on toxicological effects

Substance / Mixture

Aspiration Hazard: May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways

Skin Corrosion/Irritation: Causes skin irritation. Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.

Serious Eye Damage/Irritation: Causes mild eye irritation.

Skin Sensitisation: Not expected to be a skin sensitizer.

Respiratory Sensitisation: No information available on the mixture, however none of the components have been classifiedfor respiratory sensitisation (or are below the concentration threshold for classification).

Acute Toxicity Hazard Additional Information LC50/LD50 Data

Inhalation Harmful if inhaled > 4.1 mg/L (mist) (rat)

Dermal Unlikely to be harmful >2 g/kg (rabbit)

Oral Unlikely to be harmful > 5 g/kg (rat)

Page 50: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 7/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure): Not expected to cause organ effects from single exposure.

Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure): May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeatedexposure. Repeated dermal application of petroleum gas oils for 90 days resulted in decreased liver, thymus, and spleenweights, and altered bone marrow function. Microscopic alterations included liver hypertrophy and necrosis, decreasedhematopoesis and lymphocyte depletion.

Carcinogenicity: Suspected of causing cancer. Repeated application of residual aromatic extracts to mouse skin resulted inan increased incidence of skin tumours. They have been identified as a carcinogen by IARC.

Germ Cell Mutagenicity: Not expected to cause heritable genetic effects.

Reproductive Toxicity: No information available on the mixture, however none of the components have been classified forreproductive toxicity (or are below the concentration threshold for classification).

Other Comments: Diesel engine exhaust has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) andNational Toxicology Programme (NTP) as a carcinogen.

11.2 Information on Hazardous ComponentsNaphthaleneCarcinogenicity: Naphthalene has been evaluated in two year inhalation studies in both rats and mice. The US NationalToxicology Programme (NTP) concluded that there is clear evidence of carcinogenicity in male and female rats based onincreased incidences of respiratory epithelial adenomas and olfactory epithelial neuroblastomas of the nose. NTP found someevidence of carcinogenicity in female mice (alveolar adenomas) and no evidence of carcinogenicity in male mice. Naphthalenehas been identified as a carcinogen by IARC and NTP.

SECTION 12: Ecological information

12.1. Toxicity

Experimental studies of gas oils show that acute aquatic toxicity values are typically in the range 2-20 mg/L. These values areconsistent with the predicted aquatic toxicity of these substances based on their hydrocarbon compositions. They should beregarded as toxic to aquatic organisms, with the potential to cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.

12.2. Persistence and degradability

Gas oils are complex combinations of individual hydrocarbon species. Based on the known or expected properties of individualconstituents, category members are not predicted to be readily biodegradable. Some hydrocarbon constituents of gas oils arepredicted to meet the criteria for persistence; on the other hand, some components can be easily degraded by microorganismsunder aerobic conditions.

Persistence per IOPC Fund definition: Non-Persistent

12.3. Bioaccumulative potential

Gas oil components have measured or calculated Log Kow values in the range of 3.9 to 6 which indicates a high potential tobioaccumulate. Lower molecular weight compounds are readily metabolized and the actual bioaccumulation potential of highermolecular weight compounds is limited by the low water solubility and large molecular size.

12.4. Mobility in soil

Releases to water will result in a hydrocarbon film floating and spreading on the surface. For the lighter components,volatilisation is an important loss process and reduces the hazard to aquatic organisms. In air, the hydrocarbon vapours reactreadily with hydroxyl radicals with half-lives of less than one day. Photoxidation on the water surface is also a significant lossprocess particularly for polycyclic aromatic compounds. In water, the majority of components will be adsorbed on sediment.Adsorption is the most predominant physical process on release to soil. Adsorbed hydrocarbons will slowly degrade in bothwater and soil.

12.5. Results of PBT and vPvB assessment

Not a PBT or vPvB substance.

12.6. Other adverse effectsNone anticipated.

Page 51: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 8/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

SECTION 13: Disposal considerations

13.1. Waste treatment methods

European Waste Code: 13 07 01* fuel oil and diesel

This material, if discarded as produced, would be considered as hazardous waste pursuant to Directive 2008/98/EC onhazardous waste, and subject to the provisions of that Directive unless Article 1(5) of that Directive applies.This code has been assigned based upon the most common uses for this material and may not reflect contaminants resultingfrom actual use. Waste generators/producers are responsible for assessing the actual process used when generating thewaste and it's contaminants in order to assign the proper waste disposal code.

Disposal must be in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC and other applicable national or regional provisions, and basedupon material characteristics at time of disposal. For incineration of waste, follow Directive 2000/76/EC. For landfill of waste,follow Directive 1999/31/EC. Product is suitable for burning in an enclosed controlled burner for fuel value if >5000 BTU, ordisposal by supervised incineration at very high temperatures to prevent formation of undesirable combustion products.Follow Directive 2000/76/EC.

Empty Containers: Container contents should be completely used and containers emptied prior to discard. Empty drumsshould be properly sealed and promptly returned to a drum reconditioner. All containers should be disposed of in anenvironmentally safe manner and in accordance with applicable regulations.

SECTION 14: Transport information

14.1. UN number UN1202

14.2. UN proper shipping name DIESEL FUEL or GASOIL or HEATING OIL, LIGHT

14.3. Transport hazard class(es) 3

14.4. Packing group III

14.5. Environmental hazards Marine pollutant - Environmentally Hazardous

14.6. Special precautions for user If transported in bulk by marine vessel in internationalwaters, product is being carried under the scope of MARPOLAnnex I.

14.7. Transport in bulk according to Annex II of MARPOL73/78 and the IBC Code

Not applicable

SECTION 15: Regulatory information

15.1. Safety, health and environmental regulations/legislation specific for the substance or mixture

EC 1272/2008 - Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixturesEN166:2002 Eye ProtectionEN 529:2005 Respiratory Protective devicesBS EN 374-1:2003 Protective gloves against chemicals and micro-organismsOccupational Exposure Limits, Health and Safety AuthorityDirective 2008/98/EC (Waste Framework Directive)Directive 2000/76/EC on incineration of wasteDirective 1999/31/EC on landfill of waste

Export Rating: NLR (No Licence Required)

15.2. Chemical safety assessment

A chemical safety assessment has been carried out for the substance/mixture.

SECTION 16: Other information

Page 52: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

814603 - Fuels, diesel Page 9/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016

Status: FINAL

Previous Issue Date: 18-Feb-2014

Revised Sections or Basis for Revision: New SDS

Safety Data Sheet Number: 814603Language: BE

List of Relevant Hazard Statements:H304 - May be fatal if swallowed and enters airwaysH315 - Causes skin irritationH332 - Harmful if inhaledH351 - Suspected of causing cancerH373 - May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposureH411 - Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effectsH302 - Harmful if swallowedH410 - Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effectsEUH066 - Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking

Regulatory Basis of Classification

CLP Classification (EC No 1272/2008) Regulatory BasisH226 - Flammable liquids -- Category 3 Based on test dataH304 -- Aspiration Hazard -- Category 1 Based on test dataH315 -- Skin corrosion/irritation -- Category 2 Based on component information.H332 -- Acute toxicity, Inhalation -- Category 4 Based on component information.H351 -- Carcinogenicity -- Category 2 Based on component information.H373 -- Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure) -- Category 2 Based on component information.H411 -- Hazardous to the aquatic environment, chronic toxicity -- Category 2 Based on component information.

Guide to Abbreviations:ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; ADR = Agreement on Dangerous Goods by Road; BMGV = BiologicalMonitoring Guidance Value; CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number; CEILING = Ceiling Limit; EINECS - European Inventory ofExisting Commercial Chemical Substances; EPA = [US] Environmental Protection Agency; Germany-TRGS = Technical Rules for DangerousSubstances; IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer; ICAO/IATA = International Civil Aviation Organisation / International AirTransport Association; INSHT = National Institute for Health and Safety at Work; IMDG = International Maritime Dangerous Goods; Irland-HSA =Ireland's National Health and Safety Authority; LEL = Lower Explosive Limit; MARPOL = Marine Pollution; N/A = Not Applicable; N/D = NotDetermined; NTP = [US] National Toxicology Programme; PBT = Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic; RID = Regulations Concerning theInternational Transport of Dangerous Goods by Rail; STEL = Short Term Exposure Limit; TLV = Threshold Limit Value; TRGS 903 = Technicalrules for hazardous substances; TWA = Time Weighted Average; UEL = Upper Explosive Limit; UK-EH40 = United Kingdom EH40/2005 OEL;vPvB = very Persistent, very Bioaccumulative

Disclaimer of Expressed and implied Warranties:The information presented in this Safety Data Sheet is based on data believed to be accurate as of the date this Safety Data Sheet was prepared.HOWEVER, NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY OTHER WARRANTY ISEXPRESSED OR IS TO BE IMPLIED REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE, THERESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION OR THE PRODUCT, THE SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT, OR THEHAZARDS RELATED TO ITS USE. No responsibility is assumed for any damage or injury resulting from abnormal use or from any failure toadhere to recommended practices. The information provided above, and the product, are furnished on the condition that the person receiving themshall make their own determination as to the suitability of the product for their particular purpose and on the condition that they assume the risk oftheir use. In addition, no authorisation is given nor implied to practice any patented invention without a licence.

Page 53: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A

Exposure Scenario Annex Page 10/28

Page 54: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 11/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 Manufacture of substance - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Manufacture of substance

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3, 8, 9

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8a, 8b, 15

Environmental release category(ies) 1, 4

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 1.1.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Manufacture of the substance or use as a process chemical or extraction agent. Includes recycling/recovery, material transfers,storage, maintenance and loading (including marine vessel/barge, road/rail car and bulk container), sampling and associatedlaboratory activities

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Operation is carried out at elevated temperature (>20°C aboveambient temperature). Assumes a good basic standard ofoccupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

General exposures (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Laboratory activities No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.4e6

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 0.11

Frequency and duration of use

Gas Oils (vacuum, hydrocracked & distillate fuels) (R38,R45)

Exposure Scenario Annex

Page 55: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 12/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

2 Use of substance as an intermediate - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Use as an intermediate

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3, 8, 9

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8a, 8b, 15

Environmental release category(ies) 6a

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 6.1a.v1

Continuous release

Emission days (days/year) 300

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-2

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 3.0e-4

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.0001

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater sediment Prevent discharge of undissolved substance to or recover fromonsite wastewater Onsite wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 90

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

97.7

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

56.1

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

97.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

2.0e6

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 10000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

During manufacturing no waste of the substance is generated

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

During manufacturing no waste of the substance is generated

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html) Scaled local assessments for EU refineries have been performed usingsite-specific data and are attached in PETRORISK file – “Site-Specific Production” worksheet

Page 56: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 13/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Use of substance as an intermediate (not related to Strictly Controlled Conditions). Includes recycling/recovery, material transfers,storage, sampling, associated laboratory activities, maintenance and loading (including marine vessel/barge, road/rail car and bulkcontainer)

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Operation is carried out at elevated temperature (>20°C aboveambient temperature). Assumes a good basic standard ofoccupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

General exposures (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Laboratory activities No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 1.8e5

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 8.3e-2

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 300

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-3

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 3.0e-4

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.0001

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater sediment Prevent discharge of undissolved substance to or recover fromonsite wastewater If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, no onsite wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 80

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

81.4

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from site

Page 57: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 14/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Do not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

1.8e5

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

This substance is consumed during use and no waste of the substance is generated

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

This substance is consumed during use and no waste of the substance is generated

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

3 Distribution of substance - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Distribution of substance

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8a, 8b, 9, 15

Environmental release category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 7

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 1.1b.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Loading (including marine vessel/barge, rail/road car and IBC loading) and repacking (including drums and small packs) ofsubstance, including its sampling, storage, unloading distribution and associated laboratory activities

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employee

Page 58: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 15/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

training to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

General exposures (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Laboratory activities No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Drum and small package filling No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.4e6

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 2.0e-3

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 300

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-3

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-5

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.00001

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 90

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

2.6e6

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

During manufacturing no waste of the substance is generated

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other risk

Page 59: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 16/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

management measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

4 Formulation & (Re)packing of substance - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Formulation & (re)packing of substances and mixtures

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3, 10

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8a, 8b, 9, 14, 15

Environmental release category(ies) 2

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 2.2.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Formulation, packing and re-packing of the substance and its mixtures in batch or continuous operations, including storage,materials transfers, mixing, tableting, compression, pelletisation, extrusion, large and small scale packing, sampling, maintenanceand associated laboratory activities

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

General exposures (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Laboratory activities No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Mixing operations (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Manual Transfer from/pouring from containers No other specific measures identified

Drum/batch transfers No other specific measures identified

Production or preparation or articles by tabletting, compression,extrusion or pelletisation

No other specific measures identified

Drum and small package filling No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Page 60: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 17/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.2e6

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 5.8e-3

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 300

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-2

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 2.0e-4

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.0001

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater sediment Prevent discharge of undissolved substance to or recover fromonsite wastewater If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, no onsite wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 0

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

86.0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

2.6e5

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

External recovery and recycling of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

5 Use of substance in Metal working fluids / rolling oils - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Metal working fluids/rolling oils

Use Descriptor

Page 61: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 18/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Sector(s) of use 3

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8a, 8b, 9, 10, 13, 17

Environmental release category(ies) 4

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 4.7a.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use in formulated MWFs/rolling oils including transfer operations, rolling and annealing activities, cutting/machiningactivities, automated and manual application of corrosion protections (including brushing, dipping and spraying), equipmentmaintenance, draining and disposal of waste oils

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop. Other skin protectionmeasures such as impervious suits and face shields maybe required during high dispersion activities which arelikely to lead to substantial aerosol release, e.g. spraying

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

General exposures (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Filling / preparation of equipment from drums or containers No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Metal machining operations No other specific measures identified

Treatment by dipping and pouring No other specific measures identified

Spraying No other specific measures identified

Manual Roller, spreader, flow application No other specific measures identified

Automated metal rolling/forming No other specific measures identified

Semi-automated metal rolling/forming No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance Dedicated facility No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance Non-dedicated facility No other specific measures identified

Storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.5e2

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 0.18

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 20

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Page 62: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 19/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.02

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 3.0e-5

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater Prevent discharge of undissolved substance to or recover from onsitewastewater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 70

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

4.9e5

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

External recovery and recycling of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

6 Use of substance in Metal working fluids / rolling oils - Professional

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Metal working fluids/rolling oils

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 5, 8a, 8b, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17

Environmental release category(ies) 8a, 8d

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 8.7c.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use in formulated MWFs including transfer operations, open and contained cutting/machining activities, automated andmanual application of corrosion protections, draining and working on contaminated/reject articles, and disposal of waste oils

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Page 63: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 20/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop. Other skin protectionmeasures such as impervious suits and face shields maybe required during high dispersion activities which arelikely to lead to substantial aerosol release, e.g. spraying

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Filling / preparation of equipment from drums or containers Dedicatedfacility

No other specific measures identified

Filling / preparation of equipment from drums or containersNon-dedicated facility

No other specific measures identified

Process sampling No other specific measures identified

Metal machining operations No other specific measures identified

Manual Roller, spreader, flow application No other specific measures identified

Spraying No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance Dedicated facility No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance Non-dedicated facility No other specific measures identified

Treatment by dipping and pouring No other specific measures identified

Storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.5e2

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 5.0e-4

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 365

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.15

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.05

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.05

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseTechnical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent release Common practices vary across sites thusconservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): N/A

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewater 0

Page 64: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 21/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

removal efficiency of >= (%):

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

90

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

External recovery and recycling of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

7 Use of substance as Release agents or binders - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Use as binders and release agents

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8b, 10, 13, 14

Environmental release category(ies) 4

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 4.10a.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use as binders and release agents including material transfers, mixing, application (including spraying and brushing),mold forming and casting, and handling of waste

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean up

Page 65: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 22/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

contamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop. Other skin protectionmeasures such as impervious suits and face shields maybe required during high dispersion activities which arelikely to lead to substantial aerosol release, e.g. spraying

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Drum/batch transfers No other specific measures identified

Mixing operations (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Mixing operations (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Mould forming No other specific measures identified

Casting operations No other specific measures identified

Machine Spraying No other specific measures identified

Manual Spraying No other specific measures identified

Manual Rolling, Brushing No other specific measures identified

Dipping, immersion and pouring No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 8.0e2

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 1

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 20

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 3.0e-6

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater Prevent discharge of undissolved substance to or recover from onsitewastewater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 80

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

4.1e6

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

External recovery and recycling of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

Page 66: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 23/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

8 Use of substance as Release agents or binders - Professional

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Use as binders and release agents

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 22

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8a, 8b, 10, 11, 14

Environmental release category(ies) 8a, 8d

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 8.10b.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use as binders and release agents including material transfers, mixing, application by spraying, brushing, and handlingof waste

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop. Other skin protectionmeasures such as impervious suits and face shields maybe required during high dispersion activities which arelikely to lead to substantial aerosol release, e.g. spraying

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Drum/batch transfers No other specific measures identified

Mixing operations (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Mixing operations (open systems) No other specific measures identified

Mould forming No other specific measures identified

Casting operations No other specific measures identified

Machine Spraying No other specific measures identified

Manual Spraying No other specific measures identified

Page 67: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 24/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Rolling, Brushing No other specific measures identified

Dipping, immersion and pouring No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 8.0e2

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 5e-4

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 365

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.95

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.025

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.025

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): N/A

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

130

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

External treatment and disposal of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

External recovery and recycling of waste should comply with applicable local and/or national regulations

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for carcinogenic effects Risk management measures are based onqualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet

Page 68: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 25/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

9 Use of substance as a Fuel - Industrial

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Use as a fuel

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 3

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 8a, 8b, 16

Environmental release category(ies) 7

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 7.12a.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use as a fuel (or fuel additive) and includes activities associated with its transfer, use, equipment maintenance andhandling of waste

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Use as a fuel (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Drum/batch transfers No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 5.5e5

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 1

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 300

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 5.0e-3

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.00001

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0

Page 69: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 26/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater sediment If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, no onsitewastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): 95

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

84.6

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

5.3e6

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

Combustion emissions limited by required exhaust emission controlsCombustion emissions considered in regional exposure assessment

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

This substance is consumed during use and no waste of the substance is generated

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for carcinogenic effects Risk management measures are based onqualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

10 Use of substance as a Fuel - Professional

Section 1 Exposure ScenarioKerosenes

Title Use as a fuel

Use Descriptor

Sector(s) of use 22

Process category(ies) 1, 2, 3, 8a, 8b, 16

Environmental release category(ies) 9a, 9b

Specific Environmental Release Category ESVOC SpERC 9.12b.v1

Processes, tasks, activities covered

Covers the use as a fuel (or fuel additive) and includes activities associated with its transfer, use, equipment maintenance andhandling of waste

Section 2 Operational conditions and risk management measures

2.1 Control of worker exposure

Product characteristics

Physical form of product Liquid, vapour pressure 0.5 - 10 kPa at STP

Concentration of substance in product Covers percentage substance in the product up to 100 % (unlessstated differently).

Page 70: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 27/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

Frequency and duration of use Covers daily exposures up to 8 hours (unless stated differently)

Other operational conditions affecting exposure Assumes use at not more than 20°C above ambienttemperature, unless stated differently Assumes a good basicstandard of occupational hygiene is implemented

Contributing Scenarios / Product Category Specific Risk Management Measures & OperatingConditions

General measures (skin irritants) Avoid direct skin contact with product. Identify potentialareas for indirect skin contact. Wear gloves (tested toEN374) if hand contact with substance likely. Clean upcontamination/spills as soon as they occur. Wash off anyskin contamination immediately. Provide basic employeetraining to prevent / minimise exposures and to report anyskin problems that may develop.

General exposures (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Use as a fuel (closed systems) No other specific measures identified

Bulk transfers No other specific measures identified

Transfer from/pouring from containers No other specific measures identified

Equipment cleaning and maintenance No other specific measures identified

Bulk product storage No other specific measures identified

Kerosene exhibits irritation to the skin and is classified R38 (Irritating to skin) accordingly. The available data for this adverse effectdo not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exists toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative riskcharacterisation; please see section 2 of the SDS for the necessary RMMs.

2.2 Control of environmental exposure

Product characteristicsSubstance is complex UVCB Predominantly hydrophobic

Amounts used

Fraction of EU tonnage used in region 0.1

Regional use tonnage (tonnes/year) 4.4e6

Fraction of regional tonnage used locally 5.0e-4

Frequency and duration of useContinuous release

Emission days (days/year) 365

Environmental factors not influenced by risk management

Local freshwater dilution factor 10

Local marine water dilution factor 100

Other given operational conditions affecting environmental exposure

Release fraction to air from process (initial release prior to RMM) 1.0e-3

Release fraction to wastewater from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.00001

Release fraction to soil from process (initial release prior to RMM) 0.00001

Technical conditions and measures at process level (source) to prevent releaseCommon practices vary across sites thus conservative process release estimates used

Technical onsite conditions and measures to reduce or limit discharges, air emissions and releases to soilRisk from environmental exposure is driven by freshwater No wastewater treatment required

Treat air emission to provide a typical removal efficiency of (%): N/A

Treat onsite wastewater (prior to receiving water discharge) to provide the required removalefficiency >= (%):

0

If discharging to domestic sewage treatment plant, provide the required onsite wastewaterremoval efficiency of >= (%):

0

Organisation measures to prevent/limit release from siteDo not apply industrial sludge to natural soilsSludge should be incinerated, contained or reclaimed

Estimated substance removal from wastewater via domestic sewage treatment (%): 94.7

Total efficiency of removal from wastewater after onsite and offsite (domestic treatmentplant) RMMs (%):

94.7

Maximum allowable site tonnage (Msafe) based on release following total wastewatertreatment removal (kg/d):

6.9e5

Assumed domestic sewage treatment plant flow (m³/d): 2000

Conditions and measures related to external treatment of waste for disposal

Combustion emissions limited by required exhaust emission controlsCombustion emissions considered in regional exposure assessment

Conditions and measures related to external recovery of waste

Page 71: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

814601 - Jet A Page 28/28Issue Date: 09-Sep-2016 Status: FINAL

This substance is consumed during use and no waste of the substance is generated

Section 3 Exposure Estimation

3.1 Health

The ECETOC TRA tool has been used to estimate workplace exposures unless otherwise indicated

3.2 Environment

The Hydrocarbon Block Method has been used to calculate environmental exposure with the Petrorisk model

Section 4 Guidance to check compliance with the Exposure Scenario

4.1 Health

Available hazard data does not enable the derivation of a DNEL for dermal irritant effects Risk management measures are basedon qualitative risk characterization Available hazard data does not support the need for a DNEL to be established for other healtheffects Users are advised to consider national Occupational Exposure Limits or other equivalent values Where other riskmanagement measures/operational conditions are adopted, then users should ensure that risks are managed to at least equivalentlevels

4.2 Environment

Guidance is based on assumed operating conditions which may not be applicable to all sites; thus, scaling may be necessary todefine appropriate site-specific risk management measures Required removal efficiency for wastewater can be achieved usingonsite/offsite technologies, either alone or in combination Required removal efficiency for air can be achieved using on-sitetechnologies, either alone or in combination Further details on scaling and control technologies are provided in SpERC factsheet(http://cefic.org/en/reach-for-industries-libraries.html)

Page 72: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018

APPENDIX C

Kensington Grain Elevator Noise Assessment

Page 73: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting EIS - Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator), Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 1 ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

KENSINGTON GRAIN ELEVATOR NOISE ASSESSMENT

C1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SETTING

The Kensington Grain Elevator is located at 66 Old Summerside Road, New Annan, PEI. The

original wooden structure was constructed in 1971 and there are six (6) steel grain storage

tanks located at the current facility property. The total storage capacity of the facility is 13,000

MT and it has a drying capacity of 60-70 MT per hour. The PEI Grain Elevator Corporation

(PEIGEC) is currently in the planning process to expand the current facility to meet the

increased storage requirements for local grain and oil-seed sector for the Agricultural Industry

on PEI.

C1.1 Methodology

A sound survey was conducted on December 28, 2017 using a Casella Model No. CEL-24X

Digital Sound Level Meter with Serial No. 0339144 which was calibrated on February 20, 2017

and certificate of calibration reference number 22372-CEL1202-2651882 issued by CIH

Equipment Company Inc. The unit was also checked with Casella Acoustic calibrator provided

with the unit prior to use and found to be in within acceptable range. Mr. Neil Campbell (General

Manager) of the PEIGEC coordinated with the site manager (Mr. Wade Waddell) to have all

aeration fans and dust collectors running during the testing. Readings were taken in all

directions to the edge of the Grain Elevator property and to the boundary of the field to the east

which is currently owned by Heritage Farms. Readings were repeated at most of the locations

after the fans and dust collectors were turned off at 11:10 am on December 28, 2017. The

aeration fan (15 HP unit) on the east side of the facility was still running during the second test

and the fuel delivery vehicle readings were not repeated. The locations of all measurements

taken is shown on Figure 1.

Page 74: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting EIS - Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator), Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 2 ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

C2.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT RESULTS

A summary of the results obtained is provided in Table C-1 (attached). All distance

measurements were obtained with a Bushnell G Force DX 1300 ARC rangefinder with an

accuracy of plus or minus one metre.

C3.0 ANALYSIS

The province of Prince Edward Island currently does not have any regulatory standards for

acceptable sound levels in an outdoor environment. Sound is identified as a potential

contaminant under the definition of a contaminant in section 1 (b) of the Environmental

Protection Act.

“contaminant” includes any solid, liquid, gas, waste, odour, vibration, radiation, sound,

or a combination of them:

Page 75: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting EIS - Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator), Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 3 ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

(i) which is foreign to or in excess of the natural constituents of the environment

into which it is being introduced,

(ii) which will or may adversely affect, either directly or indirectly, the natural,

physical, chemical, or biological quality of the environment,

(iii) which is or may be injurious to the health or safety of a person or be damaging

to property or to plant or animal life,

(iv) which interferes with or is likely to interfere with the comfort, well-being,

livelihood, or enjoyment of life of a person, or

(v) which is declared by regulation to be a contaminant.

Sound is identified as having the potential to be injurious to human health in the PEI

Occupational Health and Safety Act - Section 8.3 where it states that signs must be posted for

all work areas where the sound level exceeds 85 dB (decibels) and audiometric sound tests are

required for workers exposed to 80 dB over a duration of 16 hours per day. More frequent

testing is required for higher noise levels in the workplace.

The highest dB reading recorded during the survey on December 28, 2017 was 87.1 dB at

location South 1 within 1 metre of the dust collector motor at the base of the tallest grain

elevator building. Readings over 80 dB were obtained at South 3 from truck traffic on Route No.

2 and from the back-up alarm on the fuel truck delivering fuel. One truck was loading grain

during the sound survey but there was very little additional noise associated with this operation

with exception of noise associated with operation of the truck.

The sound readings obtained at boundary locations near residential locations including East 4,

East 5, East 6, North 3, Northwest 1 were all 65 dB or below with the fans at the plant running

and when they were turned off during the second round of testing. The nearest residence at 85

Old Summerside Road, site North 4 had a maximum reading of 56.1 dB with the North Elevator

fan running and 59.4 dB when the fan was off which is attributed to vehicle traffic passing by

during the second test. The minimum reading at this same location was 43.7 dB with the

aeration motor off compared to 51.9 dB with the motors running, at 80 metres from the noise

source.

There was a decrease in dB readings recorded after the fans and dust collectors were shut

down as shown on Table C-2, except for North 4 when a passing automobile produced a noise

level of 59.6 dB.

Page 76: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting EIS - Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1 (Kensington Grain Elevator), Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018 Project No. JE0283 - March 22, 2018 4 ©DE Jardine Consulting 2018

Table C-2: Comparison of Sound Readings with Motors Running vs Shut down

Site Min. Fans Running

Min. Fans Off

Max. Fans Running

Max. Fans Off

Comments

North 1 69.4 52.3 71.2 65 -

North 2 56.3 49.9 58.6 56.9 -

North 3 52.2 46 69.1 57.4 -

North 4 51.9 43.7 59.4 59.6 Max. values due to

vehicle traffic

South 2 79.3 47.4 80.6 65 -

South 3 75.4 49.9 85.1 83.4 Truck noise from

Route No. 2

Northwest 1 51.9 44.0 59.4 74.0 Truck noise on

road.

As illustrated in Table D-2, the ambient noise levels in the area near the residential homes

ranges for 43 to 60 dB depending on vehicle traffic on roads in the area. The minimum readings

obtained when the fans and dust collectors were running would reflect the noise levels being

produced by the fans and dust collectors at the facility. Local traffic on the Old Summerside

Road and trucks driving in and out of the elevator facility increased the sound levels as reflected

in the maximum values reported. There are other sources of sound or noise in the area which

were not operating during this survey. This would include the Cavendish Agri Services Fertilizer

Plant to the west of the Grain Elevator property and an excavation pit and associated truck

traffic on the south side of Route No. 2. There is an automotive repair shop along the Old

Summerside Road to the North of the Elevator property which appears to perform most of their

repair work indoors during the winter season. There may occasionally be noise associated with

this facility due to noise from vehicles operating with malfunctioning exhaust systems or during

delivery of vehicles for repair.

Sound levels on the east side of the plant where the new expansion is proposed decreased with

distance from the nearest aeration motor on the east side of the plant. The minimum reading at

East 5 (250 m from the aeration fan) which was at the property line adjacent to the nearest

home in this direction was 48.2 decibels during the first test and 49.4 during the second test.

C4.0 SOUND ASSOCIATED WITH FUTURE EXPANSION

Information is not available regarding all the equipment which will be used for drying, dust

filtration and aerating the grain storage areas in the expanded plant. Assuming that the

equipment to be used will the same or similar to the existing equipment used for the current

operation, it is reasonable to expect sound levels will not exceed any human health related

standard for noise (80 dB). Noise abatement measures can be taken should noise levels

associated with new equipment be higher than the current equipment. These measures can

include: aiming fans toward buffer zones such as treed areas and away from residential homes;

installation of silencers; installation of sound barriers such as wooden structures, earth berms

and trees.

Page 77: Report prepared for: PEI Grain Elevator Corporation … · The EIA for the proposed project is required as per Section 9 of the PEI Environmental Protection Act. This Project Description

Joose Environmental DE Jardine Consulting Project Description - Proposed Expansion - PEI Grain Elevator No. 1, Kensington, PEI

©Joose Environmental Consulting Inc. 2018

APPENDIX D

Questions/Comments and Associated Answers/Responses from Public and Technical Review Committee