Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
Volume 70 Article 47
2016
Report on an Oomycete Infection(Heterokontophyta: Oomycota) in NorthernStudfish, Fundulus catenatus (Fundulidae) fromTenmile Creek, Saline County, ArkansasC. T. McAllisterEastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected]
H. W. RobisonSouthern Arkansas University
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas
Part of the Zoology Commons
This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able toread, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking priorpermission from the publisher or the author.This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the ArkansasAcademy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected],[email protected].
Recommended CitationMcAllister, C. T. and Robison, H. W. (2016) "Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta: Oomycota) in NorthernStudfish, Fundulus catenatus (Fundulidae) from Tenmile Creek, Saline County, Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science:Vol. 70 , Article 47.Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol70/iss1/47
1Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
fishes are relatively common (Indeed,responsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).addition,of other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
length [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waterand taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)of thehaving a moderate growth of what appeared to beunkpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimensof F. catenatusUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
determine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (Indeed,responsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).addition,of other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
Fourteen adultlength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)of thehaving a moderate growth of what appeared to beunknown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
F. catenatusUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (Indeed, among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).addition, the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
Fourteen adultlength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)of the F. catenatushaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
F. catenatusUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
Fourteen adultlength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
F. catenatushaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
F. catenatusUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
Fourteen adultlength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
F. catenatushaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
F. catenatusUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
1
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish,central Arkansas.
Fourteen adultlength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
F. catenatushaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
1Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 747452
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation inNorthern Studfish, Fundulus catenatus
Fourteen adult F. catenatuslength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
F. catenatus (70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 747452Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
F. catenatuslength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
F. catenatuslength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton woolpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
F. catenatuslength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
nown white cotton wool-like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Correspondence: [email protected]
Running Title: Oomycete Infection in Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations infishes are relatively common (Schäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
F. catenatus (mean ± 1SD totallength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al.not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
(mean ± 1SD totallength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,fungal and oomycete microbes havesignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.2008, Beakes et al. 2012; Sarowar et al. 2014).not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Fundulus catenatus
(mean ± 1SD totallength [TL] 69.9 ± 7.6, range 62-93 mm) werecollected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,vicinity of Lonsdale, Saline County (34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,
emerged assignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.
2014).not aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Storer from
(mean ± 1SD total93 mm) were
collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,
34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson StateUniversity (HSU) collection, Arkadelphia.
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish,
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,
emerged assignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.
2014). We arenot aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Storer from
(mean ± 1SD total93 mm) were
collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,
34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson State
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Oomycota) in Northern Studfish, Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,
emerged assignificant contributors (Gozlen et al. 2014).
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.
We arenot aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Storer from
(mean ± 1SD total93 mm) were
collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,
34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson State
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatus
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,
emerged asIn
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.
We arenot aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Storer from
(mean ± 1SD total93 mm) were
collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,
34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson State
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.279
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
C.T. McAllister1
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Cases of oomycete (water mold) infestations inSchäperclaus 1986).
among recent emerging infectious diseasesresponsible for severe population declines in fish taxa,
emerged asIn
the oomycetes negatively impact a wide arrayof other taxa including insects, zooplankton,nematodes, crayfish and amphibians (Phillips et al.
We arenot aware of any previous reports of an oomyceteinfection in native fishes of Arkansas. Here, wedocument a noteworthy oomycete infestation in
Storer from
(mean ± 1SD total93 mm) were
collected with a backpack electrofisher on 15November 2015 from Tenmile Creek off US 70,
34.545463ºN,92.753702ºW). Specimens were placed in creek waternd taken to the laboratory within 24 hr for processing.
Fish were killed by immersion in a concentratedchloretone solution and measured for TL. Two (14%)
(70 and 76 mm) were noted ofhaving a moderate growth of what appeared to be
like patches on a smallpart of their body (head and chin) (Fig. 1). Thisgrowth was sampled by removing a portion with fineforceps, placed on a microscopic slide, stained withbromphenol cotton blue, and mounted with a coverslip.The slide was examined under a light microscope andphotomicrographs were obtained. Voucher specimens
are deposited in the Henderson State
Although it was not possible with confidence todetermine with certainty which genus is present inthis case without culturing and DNA sequence data,microscopic examination of the infestation revealed
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.279
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
1 and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.279
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infectedgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
nonhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes)Weber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
at the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infectedgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
non-hyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes)Weber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infectedgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
-septatehyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes)Weber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infectedgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
septatehyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes)Weber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:Fundulus catenatus (Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infectedgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
septate, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes)Weber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
and H.W. Robison2
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Figure 1. Infected Fundulus catenatusgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold(Oomycetes) Saprolegniales species (Webster andWeber 2007).oomycetes belong to this order including the generaAchlya, Aphanomycesthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Creek, Saline County, Arkansas
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatusgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andWeber 2007). The bestoomycetes belong to this order including the genera
omycesthis order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, includingGambusia affinis,
70, 2016
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatusgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andThe best
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaomyces and
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, including
, Lepomis cyanellus
70, 2016
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754
Fundulus catenatusgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andThe best
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaand
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, including
Lepomis cyanellus
70, 2016
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 74745Department of Biology, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754-9354
Fundulus catenatusgrowth (arrows) on top of head, moutappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andThe best-studied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaand Saprolegnia
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site didinfestation, including Campostoma spadiceum
Lepomis cyanellus
Report on an Oomycete Infection (Heterokontophyta:(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 747459354
Fundulus catenatus (TL = 76 mm). A. Oomycetegrowth (arrows) on top of head, mouth and chin. Note that thereappears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaSaprolegnia
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same dateat the Tenmile Creek site did not harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumLepomis cyanellus
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
Science and Mathematics Division, Eastern Oklahoma State College, Idabel, OK 747459354
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaSaprolegnia
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumLepomis cyanellus
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaSaprolegnia
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumLepomis cyanellus
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaSaprolegnia. Organisms in
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollensporangia (Schäperclaus 1986, fig. 236).
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumLepomis cyanellus and
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth andunderside of chin with smaller colonies on top of head.
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaOrganisms in
this order reproduce asexually bybiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollen
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumand
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Closesame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth and
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaOrganisms in
releasingbiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollen
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumand Noturus
(Fundulidae) from Tenmile
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
appears to be no other growth on remainder of body. B. Close-up ofsame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth and
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaOrganisms in
releasingbiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollen
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceumNoturus
(TL = 76 mm). A. Oomyceteh and chin. Note that there
up ofsame showing filamentous mycelia growing on the mouth and
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaOrganisms in
releasingbiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollen
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
Campostoma spadiceum,Noturus
, multinucleate and unbranched or branchedhyphae (Fig. 2) similar to those of the water mold
Saprolegniales species (Webster andstudied fish pathogenic
oomycetes belong to this order including the generaOrganisms in
releasingbiflagellated spores formed in apical slightly swollen
Numerous other fishes collected on the same datenot harbor any similar
,Noturus
279
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70 [2016], Art. 47
Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 2016
lachnericollected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Figure 2.non-encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenolcotton
lachnericollected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Figure 2.-septate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenolcotton blue.
lachneri. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Figure 2. Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
blue.
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
blue.
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection inseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Oomycete infection in Fundulus catenatusseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Fundulus catenatusseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Fundulus catenatusseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Fundulus catenatusseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Fundulus catenatusseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
Fundulus catenatus. A. Unstainedseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
. A. Unstainedseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
. A. Unstainedseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,collected many fishes from all river drainages in the
. A. Unstainedseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
C.T. McAllister
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016280
. In addition, we have, over the last 40+ yr,
. A. Unstainedseptate hyphae (arrow); scale bar = 50 µm. B. Three balls of
encysted zoospores (arrows); scale bar = 50 µm. C. Single zoosporeball (arrow); scale bar = 25 µm. B & C stained with bromphenol
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016280
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016280
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
infection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
scientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL Glockling
Gozlan
Phillips
Sandoval
Schäperclaus W
Sarowar
Webster J
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete“fungi”.
GozlanFH Gleasonecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
PhillipsSecombesanimalMicrobiology16:13
SandovalA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (nov. andONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus WAmerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (NewDelhi). p 1
SarowarFH Gleasonstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
Webster J3York. 867 p.
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete“fungi”.
GozlanFH Gleasonecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
PhillipsSecombesanimalMicrobiology16:13
SandovalA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (nov. andONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus WAmerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (NewDelhi). p 1
SarowarFH Gleasonstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
Webster J3rd
York. 867 p.
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete“fungi”.
Gozlan RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,FH Gleasonecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
Phillips AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJSecombesanimalMicrobiology16:13
Sandoval-Sierra JVA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (nov. andONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus WAmerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (NewDelhi). p 1
SarowarFH Gleasonstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
Webster JEdition. Cambridge Univer
York. 867 p.
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete“fungi”. Protoplasma 249:3
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,FH Gleasonecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJSecombesanimalMicrobiology16:13
Sierra JVA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (nov. andONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus WAmerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (NewDelhi). p 1
Sarowar NMFH Gleasonstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
Webster J andEdition. Cambridge Univer
York. 867 p.
and H.W. Robison
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgmen
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
FH Gleasonecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJSecombes and
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends iMicrobiology16:13
Sierra JVA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (nov. and Saprolegnia racemosaONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus WAmerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (NewDelhi). p 1–594.
NM, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OFH Gleasonstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
and R WeberEdition. Cambridge Univer
York. 867 p.
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
Acknowledgments
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Literature Cited
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
FH Gleason andecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJand P van Westpathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
Microbiology16:13Sierra JV
A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (
Saprolegnia racemosaONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
Schäperclaus W. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
594., M Saraiva, CN Jessop, O
FH Gleason andstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
R WeberEdition. Cambridge Univer
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
andecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers inMicrobiology 5:1–16.
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJP van West
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends iMicrobiology16:13−19.
Sierra JV andA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (
Saprolegnia racemosaONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
594., M Saraiva, CN Jessop, O
andstrategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
R WeberEdition. Cambridge Univer
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
and D Andreouecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
16.AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ
P van Westpathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
−19.and J Diéguez
A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): twopractical examples (Saprolegnia aenigmatica
Saprolegnia racemosaONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132999
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, Oand P van West
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217
R Weber. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,Edition. Cambridge Univer
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70, 2016
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
Beakes GW, SL GlocklingThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
D Andreouecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJP van West
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i−19.
J DiéguezA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticaSaprolegnia racemosa
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OP van West
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungalGruyter (Berlin). p 217–243.
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,Edition. Cambridge Univer
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first repinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
andThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
Protoplasma 249:3–19.RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
D Andreouecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJP van West. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
J DiéguezA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticaSaprolegnia racemosa
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OP van West
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungal
243.. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,
Edition. Cambridge Univer
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
We document the first report of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllisterhelp in collecting at Tenmile Creek.
and S SekimotoThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
19.RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,
D Andreouecological understanding of fungalof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
J Diéguez-A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticaSaprolegnia racemosa
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OP van West
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.Freshwater Fungi and fungal-like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,Edition. Cambridge Univer
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllister
S SekimotoThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,D Andreou.
ecological understanding of fungal-of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
-UribeondoA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticaSaprolegnia racemosa sp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OP van West. 2014.
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,Edition. Cambridge University Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllister
S SekimotoThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,2014. Current
-like pathogensof fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
UribeondoA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticasp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, O. 2014.
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllister
S SekimotoThe evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,2014. Currentlike pathogens
of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
UribeondoA comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticasp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, O. 2014.
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as apotential pathogen on Arkansas fish populations.
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) forexpert curatorial assistance, and the McAllister clan for
S Sekimoto. 2012.The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,2014. Currentlike pathogens
of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
Uribeondo. 2015.A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmaticasp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
, M Saraiva, CN Jessop, OInfection
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as a
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could bediscovered having similar infestations in the state.
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) for
clan for
. 2012.The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,2014. Currentlike pathogens
of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends i
. 2015.A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
Saprolegnia aenigmatica sp.sp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
LiljeInfection
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish.Jones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as a
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could be
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) for
clan for
. 2012.The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
RW, WL Marshall, O Lilje, CN Jessop,2014. Currentlike pathogens
of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
AJ, VL Anderson, EJ Robertson, CJ. 2008. New insights into
pathogenic oomycetes. Trends in
. 2015.A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
sp.sp. nov.). PLoS
ONE 10(7): e0132999. Doi:10.1371/
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
Lilje,Infection
strategies of pathogenic Oomycetes in fish. InJones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
state and never recall seeing such a similar infection ona single fish. Therefore, we suggest this is a fairly rareevent and it does not appear to pose a serious risk as a
ort of an oomyceteinfection in a native Arkansas fish species. Additionalresearch on this topic, including molecular studies, willsurely extend our knowledge and further hosts could be
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission issued ascientific collecting permit to CTM. We thank Dr. R.Gozlen (IRD, Paris, France) for information onoomycete infections in fish, Dr. R. Tumlison (HSU) for
clan for
. 2012.The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete
2014. Currentlike pathogens
of fish: What lies beneath? Frontiers in
. 2008. New insights inton
. 2015.A comprehensive protocol for improving thedescription of Saprolegniales (Oomycota): two
sp.sp. nov.). PLoS
. 1986. Fish diseases, Volume 1.Amerind Publishing Company, Pvt. Ltd. (New
,Infection
InJones EGB, KD Hyde and KL Pang, editors.
like organisms, De
. 2007. Introduction to Fungi,sity Press, New
280
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70 [2016], Art. 47
http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol70/iss1/47
![Exchanges at the Plant-Oomycete Interface That Influence ...Exchanges at the Plant-Oomycete Interface That Influence Disease1[OPEN] ... (Vitis vinifera), and Albugo candida, which](https://img.dokumen.tips/doc/110x75/5ed1640f17948f09cb405ebb/exchanges-at-the-plant-oomycete-interface-that-influence-exchanges-at-the-plant-oomycete.jpg)
