Report of Analysis - DISD Grievance System (2015-04-29)

Aequitas Group P.O. Box 192546 Dallas, TX 75219

aequitasgroup.org

April 29, 2015

Delivered via E-Mail

Board of Trustees Dallas Independent School District 3700 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75204

Honorable Trustees:

During my ten year tenure as an employee with the District I had the opportunity to be involved in over a dozen grievances as a grievant, witness, and hearing officer. Since my departure last September, and not including my own termination grievance, I have had the opportunity to serve as a representative for two former employees in their grievances and have participated as such in three hearings thus far. I began to suspect inherent problems in how the administration manages the grievance system, including a potential for a systemic practice of violating the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of District employees. As such, I developed, researched, and tested three hypotheses related to the grievance system through information obtained primarily through Public Information Act requests and secondarily though direct observation. All three hypotheses are supported as true by the evidentiary findings. My research and findings are hereby presented to you for review and consideration as you continue your mission of oversight of the administration of the District for the benefit of its approximately 160,000 students and approximately 20,000 employees who serve those students.

Please excuse any spelling or grammatical errors as my focus was more on data analysis and interpretation than spelling and grammar during my efforts to get this report in your hands as soon as possible given the events of this week.

Respectfully,

Jeremy Liebbe

Enclosures

Analysis of Internal Grievance System of the Dallas ISD P a g e 1

https://trust.docusign.com


aequitasgroup.org

Introduction

The Dallas Independent School District (“District”) operates a grievance

system through the Human Resources Department, also known as Human Capital

Management, which should operate in accordance with federal law, state law, and

the DGBA series of District policies established by the Board of Trustees. From

the broadest legal perspective an efficient, neutral, and unbiased grievance

system effectively required by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S.

Constitution.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or

of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition

the government for a redress of grievances.” (1st Amendment, 1791)

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the

jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein

they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the

privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state

deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the

laws.” (14th Amendment, Section 1, 1868)

While specific references are made to the 1st and 14th Amendments to the

U.S. Constitution, this paper does not seek to discuss the full legal applicability of



aequitasgroup.org

Constitutional, federal, state, and case law issues as they apply to the District’s

grievance system. It should be noted, however, that an inefficient and/or biased

grievance system has significant legal implications including violation of the

Constitutional rights afforded to District employees.

During my ten years of employment and eight months post-employment I

have had the opportunity to directly observe the District’s grievance system from

almost every angle – serving as a grievant, witness, hearing officer, and

representative at all three levels of hearings over the course of over a dozen

grievances. During said observations I developed testable hypotheses which I

believed required research and analysis:

Hypothesis 1: District policy mandates that a “Level I hearing shall be held

within ten days of the date the grievant requests a Level I hearing” and a “Level II

hearing shall be held within ten days after the date a Level II hearing request is

received” (DGBA Local, 2015). The District has established a pattern and practice

of failing to hold Level I and Level II hearings within policy required time frames.

Hypothesis 2: Grievances are typically heard at Level I by the grievant’s

immediate supervisor and at Level II by a hearing officer selected by Employee

Relations from a pool of administrators approved by the Superintendent of

Schools or designee (DGBA Local, 2015). Grievance decisions at both Level I and

Level II show a strong internal bias favoring the administration.



aequitasgroup.org

Hypothesis 3: The Board of Trustees requires that “[on] a semiannual

basis, the Human Resources Department shall submit a report to the Board

outlining the status of employee grievances in the District” (DGBA Local, 2015).

The Human Resources Department, also known as Human Capital Management,

has failed to submit any such reports for at least the three years that Mike Miles

has served as the Superintendent of Schools.

Method

On April 13, 2015, a request pursuant to the Public Information Act was

filed requesting 1) all reports from the past 5 years related to Hypothesis 3 and

13 data points for each grievance filed which would tend to relate to Hypothesis

1 and Hypothesis 2 (Liebbe, 2015). School attorney Leticia McGowan

acknowledged receipt of the request on April 14th (McGowan 1, 2015). On April

27th, Leticia McGowan provided the District’s response to the Public Information

Act request via a letter transmitted via e-mail and a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet

provided on a CD-R (McGowan 2, 2015; Dallas ISD, 2015).

A multivariate empirical analysis was conducted on the sequential series

of grievance data provided by the District on April 27th. The series included only

grievances files after July 1, 2015, and therefore are representative of all

grievances filed after Tonya Sadler Grayson, Executive Director of HR Operations,

conducted a reorganization that impacted several divisions within human



aequitasgroup.org

resources. I would be happy to conduct the same analysis and review for the

preceding time period for comparison should the requisite data be provided to

me.

It should be noted that I have removed the names of employee grievants

and employee respondents from the attached copy of the data used for the

empirical analysis 1) as those names are not relevant to the analysis and 2) to

maintain privacy for those employees who filed grievances.

The District provided no semi-annual reports from the Human Resources

Department to the Board of Trustees for the past five years. The substantive

response included “Please note, per the Board Services Office, there have been no

semi-annual report received. Therefore, there is no information responsive to this

portion of your request.” (McGowan 2, 2015). This lack of informational response

is sufficient to validate Hypothesis 3 as true.

The District provided a 13 column spreadsheet containing requested data

points for 161 discrete grievances filed between July 7, 2014, and April 16, 2015.

The responsive data was sufficient to fully analyze the time frames of Level I

hearings but was insufficient to fully analyze the time frames of Level II and Level

III hearings. A review of the original request found that the request did not specify

the need for the dates that the Level II hearing requests and Level III hearing

requests were received, which may have contributed to the insufficient data

points (Liebbe, 2015). As such, calculations for Level II and Level III time frames



aequitasgroup.org

assume that 1) the lower level decision letter was provided to the grievant on the

last day allowed pursuant to policy (10 days) and 2) the subsequent hearing

request was filed by the grievant on the last day allowed pursuant to policy (10

days). These assumptions tend to favor the District – and it should be noted that

the violations of required time frames at Level II and Level III may thus be more

prevalent than herein reported.

Results

The 161 grievances analyzed represented principals, assistant principals,

teachers, teacher assistants, assorted support personnel, and a handful of central

staff supervisors. Six grievances were filed by central staff employees holding

positions of Manager or higher. Of the 161 grievances filed, 20 (12.4%) involved

a waiver of the Level I hearing moving directly to a Level II hearing.

Figure 1: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, All Grievances

7

7

74

38

35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF



aequitasgroup.org

The subjects of grievances represented 9 core categories of complaints: 1)

Appraisals (e.g. 3R, TEI, etc.), 2) Compensation, 3) Discipline (e.g. Letter of

Concern, Written Reprimand, Individual Improvement Plan, Suspension, etc.), 4)

Discrimination & Harassment (e.g. DIA policy violations, harassment, retaliation,

etc.), 5) Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) violations, 6) Demotions &

Reassignments, 7) Termination of At-Will Employees, 8) Termination of Contract

Employees, and 9) Other (e.g. all other grievances). The largest categories were

1) Termination of At-Will Employees, 2) Discrimination & Harassment, and 3)

Discipline.

Figure 2: All Grievances Filed by Subject of Grievance

14

33

5

25

2

32

29

9

12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

TERM / CONTRACT

TERM / AT-WILL

DEMOTE & REASSIGN

OTHER

FMLA

DISCRIM & HARASS

DISCIPLINE

COMPENSATION

APPRAISALS



aequitasgroup.org

The number of grievances held and the number of working days between

the filing of those grievances and their hearings was analyzed with respect to

Hypothesis 1. The results show that grievance hearings are held within

appropriate time frames 5.0% of the time at Level I, 0.0% of the time at Level II,

and 50.0% of the time at Level III. The results do not include the 105 grievances

filed that have not yet received a Level I hearing.

Figure 3: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, All Grievances

55

31

12

7

0

6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org

Calculations were made to ascertain the minimum, mean, median, mode,

maximum, range, and 1st standard deviation for the number of working days that

transpired between the filing date and the hearing date. Additional calculations

were made to evaluate grievances filed which have not yet received a Level I

hearing calculated through April 29th, 2015.

Level I (Pending Hearing)

Level I (Hearing Held)

Level II (Hearing Held)

Level III (Hearing Held)

Minimum 10.0 6.0 18.0 10.0 Mean 102.5 24.8 60.0 21.8

Median 114.0 20.5 57.5 19.5 Mode 210.0 10.0 58.0 14.0

Max 213.0 79.0 148.0 35.0 Range 203.0 73.0 130.0 25.0

1st Std Dev 62.7 17.8 35.7 10.4 Figure 4: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, All Grievances

Calculations were made with regards to the decisions of the hearing

officers or Board subcommittee at each level. Decisions were grouped into

categories of 1) Granted, 2) Granted in Part, 3) Denied, 4) Withdrawn by Grievant,

and 5) Settled without Hearing. In all, only 7.1% of grievance decisions resulted

in the grievant’s requested relief being fully granted. Please note that these

calculations do not include the 105 grievances that are awaiting a Level I hearing.



aequitasgroup.org

Figure 5: Grievance Hearing Outcomes by Level, All Grievances

Parallel calculations were conducted to drill down into and compare

results for specific grievance categories. For brevity, only the figures will be

shown for each category.

5

14

23

25

4

2

7

18

2

2

1

1

7

0

2

8

22

48

27

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING

OVERALL Level III Level II Level I



aequitasgroup.org

Appraisals

Figure 6: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, Appraisals

Figure 7: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, Appraisals

1

0

8

1

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF

5

0

0

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org





Minimum 9.0 14.0 Mean 22.0 61.6

Median 20.0 22.0 Mode

Max 42.0 210.0 Range 33.0 196.0

1st Std Dev 13.6 84.3 Figure 8: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, Appraisals

Figure 9: Grievances Hearing Outcomes by Level, Appraisals

1

3

0

3

0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING




aequitasgroup.org

Compensation

Figure 10: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, Compensation

Figure 11: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, Compensation

0

2

6

0

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF

6

4

2

0

0

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org





Minimum 17.0 11.0 30.0 35.0 Mean 35.5 20.2 64.3 35.0

Median 35.5 20.5 59.0 35.0 Mode 30.0 35.0

Max 54.0 28.0 109.0 35.0 Range 37.0 17.0 79.0 0.0

1st Std Dev 21.4 5.9 40.4 0.0 Figure 12: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, Compensation

Figure 13: Grievances Hearing Outcomes by Level, Compensation

0

1

5

0

1

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

1

10

0

1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING




aequitasgroup.org

Discipline

Figure 14: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, Discipline

Figure 15: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, Discipline

4

3

16

2

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF

16

4

2

2

0

0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org





Minimum 10.0 10.0 24.0 28.0 Mean 72.9 25.4 37.8 29.0

Median 74.0 21.5 33.5 29.0 Mode 133.0 22.0

Max 154.0 79.0 60.0 30.0 Range 144.0 69.0 36.0 2.0

1st Std Dev 55.9 22.0 16.7 1.2 Figure 16: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, Discipline

Figure 17: Grievances Hearing Outcomes by Level, Discipline

2

5

5

6

0

0

1

2

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

3

6

8

6

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING




aequitasgroup.org

Harassment

Figure 18: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, Harassment

Figure 19: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, Harassment

2

0

18

8

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF

9

1

0

0

0

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org





Minimum 16.0 12.0 58.0 Mean 93.3 26.0 58.0

Median 91.5 26.0 58.0 Mode 128.0

Max 208.0 41.0 58.0 Range 192.0 29.0 0.0

1st Std Dev 58.2 10.5 0.0 Figure 20: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, Harassment

Figure 21: Grievances Hearing Outcomes by Level, Harassment

1

2

1

5

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

1

5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING




aequitasgroup.org

Reassignment & Termination

Figure 22: Positions of Employees Filing Grievances, Reassign & Termination

Figure 23: Grievances Hearings Held by Level & Deadline, Reassign & Termination

0

0

9

21

22

0 5 10 15 20 25

PRINCIPALS

ASST. PRINCIPALS

TEACHERS

CAMPUS SUPPORT

CENTRAL STAFF

11

21

8

2

0

6

0 5 10 15 20 25

1

2

3

Met Deadline Held



aequitasgroup.org





Minimum 13.0 6.0 18.0 10.0 Mean 131.3 25.5 66.1 16.8

Median 140.0 15.5 58.0 14.0 Mode 140.0 15.0 58.0 10.0

Max 213.0 73.0 148.0 34.0 Range 200.0 67.0 130.0 24.0

1st Std Dev 59.5 24.7 37.9 9.6 Figure 24: Working Days until Grievance Hearings by Level, Reassign & Term.

Figure 25: Grievances Hearing Outcomes by Level, Reassign & Termination

0

1

9

8

2

2

4

13

2

2

0

2

4

0

2

2

7

26

10

6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

GRANTED

GRANTED IN PART

DENIED

WITHDRAWN

SETTLED W/O HEARING




aequitasgroup.org

Findings & Discussion

Hypothesis 1: District policy mandates that a “Level I hearing shall be held

within ten days of the date the grievant requests a Level I hearing” and a “Level II

hearing shall be held within ten days after the date a Level II hearing request is

received” (DGBA Local, 2015). The District has established a pattern and practice of

failing to hold Level I and Level II hearings within policy required time frames.

Hypothesis 1 was found to be true in 96.3% of the cases analyzed. The data

and analysis for the time period researched clearly shows an overwhelming

pattern and practice of failing to hold Level I and Level II hearings within policy

required time frames. It is my opinion that this violates the due process clause of

the 14th Amendment, inhibits employee rights established under the 1st

Amendment, clearly violates Board policy, and potentially violates a host of other

statutes and rulings at the state and federal level. The data and analysis would

support employee grievants filing for Mandamus Writs from a state District Court

ordering the day, time, and place for grievance hearings to be held.

Hypothesis 2: Grievances are typically heard at Level I by the grievant’s

immediate supervisor and at Level II by a hearing officer selected by Employee

Relations from a pool of administrators approved by the Superintendent of Schools

or designee (DGBA Local, 2015). Grievance decisions at both Level I and Level II

show a strong internal bias favoring the administration.



aequitasgroup.org

Hypothesis 2 was found to be true in 59.4%, partially true in 30.4%, and

false in 10.1% of the cases analyzed. The data and analysis for the time period

researched shows a weak to moderate internal bias of the hearing officers at both

Level I and Level II in favor of the administration and to the detriment of

employees. I suspect that the internal bias would report stronger were 105

grievances not holding an average of 114 working days for a Level I hearing as it

is more likely that administratively weaker cases are more likely to be delayed

than administratively strong cases. It is my opinion that this potentially violates

the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, potentially inhibits employee

rights established under the 1st Amendment, potentially violates the spirit of

Board policy, and thus creates a potential for liability to the District.

Hypothesis 3: The Board of Trustees requires that “[on] a semiannual basis,

the Human Resources Department shall submit a report to the Board outlining the

status of employee grievances in the District” (DGBA Local, 2015). The Human

Resources Department, also known as Human Capital Management, has failed to

submit any such reports for at least the three years that Mike Miles has served as the

Superintendent of Schools.

Hypothesis 3 was found to be true 100% of the time for the past five years.

This could be interpreted as a series of intentional omissions that would tend to

cover up inherent problems in the administration and management of the



aequitasgroup.org

grievance system, such as those posed in Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 or, at

best, a systematic concern of gross negligence.

Limitations of Analysis and Findings

The presented analysis and findings are limited by the amount and quality

of the data obtained from the District via the Public Information Act. Direct

acquisition of data from the actual grievance files for the time period analyzed and

previous time period(s) may generate different statistical findings.

Recommendations

I recommend that the Board of Trustees consider and take swift action to

bring this issue under control to mitigate current liability and minimize future

liability to the District. Additional research would likely show how long the

deficiencies in the administration and management of the grievance system have

existed as well as trend data that would likely help isolate and identify events that

had significant impact on the development and growth of the deficiencies. A

complete overhaul of the District’s grievance system with significant focus on due

process is highly indicated. Post-overhaul research and analysis would tend to

show systematic improvements.



aequitasgroup.org

References

1st Amendment. (1791). U.S. Constitution, Amendment I.

14th Amendment. (1868). U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV.

Dallas ISD. (April 27, 2015). Spreadsheet provided pursuant to ORR Request

#14002. Attached as Exhibit #4 (12 pages).

DGBA Local. (2015). Personnel-Management Relations: Employee

Complaints/Grievances. Dallas ISD Board Policy Manual. Retrieved from

http://pol.tasb.org/Home/Index/361.

Liebbe, J. (April 13, 2015). Public Information Request to Dallas ISD. Attached as

Exhibit #1 (2 pages).

McGowan, L. (April 14, 2015). Letter regarding ORR Request #14002. Attached

as Exhibit #2 (1 page).

McGowan, L. (April 27, 2015). Letter regarding ORR Request #14002. Attached

as Exhibit #3 (2 pages).


http://pol.tasb.org/Home/Index/361

1

Jeremy Liebbe

From: Jeremy LiebbeSent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:11 PMTo: '[email protected]'Cc: '[email protected]'Subject: Public Information Request to Dallas ISD

April 13, 2015 Via email to [email protected] Dallas Independent School District Public Information Request Attention: Leticia D. McGowan 3700 Ross Avenue, Box 74 Dallas, Texas 75204 Subject: Public Information Request to Dallas ISD Ms. McGowan: Pursuant to The Public Information Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 552, please provide to me the following records:

1. All reports submitted to the Board of Trustees by the Human Resources Department (Human Capital Management) outlining the status of employee grievances in the District as required on a semiannual basis by Board Policy [see “Report”, DGBA(LOCAL)] during the past five years.

2. Any record created and/or maintained by the Human Resources Department (Human Capital Management) and/or Employee Relations containing the following information related to grievances:

a. Grievant’s name b. Grievant’s position c. Grievant’s campus or division d. Respondent(s)’ name(s) e. Respondent(s)’ position(s) f. Type of grievance (e.g. termination, work environment, appraisal, compensation, discrimination,

retaliation, etc.) g. Date grievance originally filed h. Date of Level I Hearing i. Outcome at Level I (e.g. granted, granted in part, denied, etc.) j. Date of Level II Hearing k. Outcome at Level II (e.g. granted, granted in part, denied, etc.) l. Date of Level III Hearing m. Outcome at Level III (e.g. granted, granted in part, denied, etc.)

Please note that this request is time sensitive as the information requested is salient to and of evidentiary value for an employee grievance pursuant to the DGBA policy series filed by Donna Blackmon on or about March 25, 2015 (see attached).

2

If some of this material is more readily available than the rest, either because of logistics or questions of law, we request the release of the available material while the remaining documents are being prepared or reviewed for release. In order to reduce the cost for and expedite the production of these records the aforementioned documents are requested to be supplied via email attachment in an electronic copy in a standardized readable format such as Adobe PDF. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Donna Blackmon, Grievant C/O Jeremy Liebbe, Representative PO Box Dallas, Texas

@ Respectfully, Jeremy Liebbe Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth. ‐ Marcus Aurelius

Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools

April 14, 2015

Jeremy Liebbe P.0.BoxDallas,Te~

VIA EMAlL:

Dear Mr. Liebbe:

Dallas D l~~ndent . Sdlool District

Educating All Students For Success

Your request for a copy of information submitted to the Board of Trustees by the Human Resources Department (Human Capital Management) regarding employee grievances was received on April 14, 2015. The reference number assigned to your request is #14002. You will be contacted once the information has been gathered.

Sincerely,

4fl' 'rz/tJtW-S!i~~/ Leticia D. McGowan \ ' School Attorney

3700 Ross Ave Dallas, TX 75204 (972) 925-3700 wwv:.dallaslsd.org

Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools

April 27, 2015

Jeremy Liebbe P.O.BoxDallas, Texas -

VIA EMAIL:

Dear Mr. Liebbe:

Dallas D Inde~ndent . School

District Educating All Students For Success

You have requested a copy of information submitted to the Board of Trustees by the Human Resources Department (Human Capital Management) regarding employee grievances. The invoice for the responsive information is attached. You may either mail the check payable to Dallas !SD or to the Dallas Independent School District, and the CD will be mailed upon receipt of payment, or you may pick the CD up in person at the Administration Building, located at 3700 Ross Avenue, in room 115. Please note, per the Board Services Office, there have been no semi-annual report received. Therefore, there is no information responsive to this portion of your request. Please let me know if additional information is needed.

Sincerely,

Lf,pn'vi Leticia D. McGowan School Attorney

3700 Ross Ave. Dallas, TX 75204 (972) 925-3700 www.dallasisd.org

Dallas Independent School District Public Records Charges

(Texas Government Code, Chapter 6521 Texas Administrative Code, Section 111.70)

Date:

Description of Information: Agency/Company:

Address:

Fax: Telephone: E-mail:

Standard-size paper copies Nonstandard-size copies:

Diskette CD-R or CD-RW Zip Disk VHS Video Cassette Audio Cassette Paper (Oversized) Other: Transcript

Personnel Charges: Programming Personnel Other Personnel (if o,.," pgs) Personnel Sub Total Overhead Charges

(20% of Total Porsoririel Charges)

Computer Resources Charges: Mainframe Midrange Client/Server PC or LAN

Postage/Shipping Charges Other Charges:

(Oescrfpt!on:)

Dallas Independent School District Attn: Leticia D. McGowan 3700 Ross Avenue, Box 74 Dallas, TX 75204

BILL#1400::Lxls

4127/2015 Ref. No. 14002

Personnel Information • Employee Grievances Jeremy Liebbe

Dallas, T~ P.O. Box~

@$0.10/page Total: $

@$1.00/ea Total: $ 1 @$1.00/ea Total: $

(actual cost) Total: $ @$2.50/ea Total: $ @$1.00/ea Total: s @$ 0.50/ea Total: $

(actual cost) Total:

@$28.50/hr Total: $ 0.5@ $15.00lhr Total: $

$

x.20 Total: $

@ $10.00/CPU min Total: $ @$1.50/CPU min Total: $ @ $2.20/per clock hr Total: $ @$1.00/per clock hr Total: s

(actual cost) Total:

Total:

Total Charges: $

Cash ---

1.00

7.50 7.50

1.50

10.00

Check ----

orr14002 Names Removed

NAME/ID POSITIONCAMPUS /

DIRECTORATEDIVISION /

DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED

AGAINSTPRIMARY TYPE OF

GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL

HEARING DATE (OR SETTLED

DATE)LEVEL IIIDECISION

SPECIALIST II Food and Child Nutrition Services

Operations Services TERM / CONTRACT 7/7/2014 WAIVED 9/9/2014 DENIED

DIRECTOR Human Resource Operations

Human Capital Management

APPRAISAL / PERFORMANCE

SCORECARD7/8/2014 7/31/2014 GRANTED

TEACHER Lakewood ES Division 4 WC / OTHER 7/10/2014 RESOLVED INFORMALLY

PARAPROFESSIONAL

SUPERVISOR

Food and Child Nutrition Services

Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 7/10/2014 WITHDRAWN

OFFICE MANAGER Douglass ES Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 7/10/2014 WITHDRAWN

COORDINATOR

HCM - Alternative Certification &

Special Systems


APPRAISAL / PERFORMANCE

SCORECARD7/10/2014 WITHDRAWN

SPECIALIST Food and Child Nutrition Services

Operations Services

WC / DISCRIMINATION (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)7/14/2014

TEACHER Quintanilla MS Division 1 TERM / CONTRACT 7/14/2014 WAIVED 11/6/2014 DENIED 1/15/2015 DENIED

CRAFTSPERSON

Maintenance and Facility Services

Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 7/28/2014

CRAFTSPERSON


Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 7/29/2014 WAIVED 9/25/2014 DENIED 11/7/2014 SETTLED

INSTRUCTIONAL COACH Greiner MS Division 1 WC / ASSIGNMENT 7/30/2014 8/15/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Seagoville North ES Division 5 TERM / CONTRACT 8/7/2014

TEACHER ASSISTANT Holland ES Division 4 TERM / AT-WILL 8/11/2014 11/6/2014 DENIED 1/26/2015 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER ASSISTANT Burleson ES Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 8/18/2014 SETTLED

Page 1 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



OFFICE MANAGER Holmes MS Division 1 TERM / AT-WILL 8/22/2014 WAIVED

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 POSN / REASSIGNMENT 8/25/2014 RESOLVED

INFORMALLY

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5WC / DISCRIMINATION

(NOT PROTECTED CLASS)

8/26/2014

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5WC / DISCRIMINATION


9/3/2014

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5

WC / UNPROFESSIONAL

BEHAVIOR / CODE OF ETHICS

9/3/2014 10/2/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 WC / SCHEDULE 9/3/2014 10/17/2014 GRANTED IN PART

TEACHER ASSISTANT Atwell MS Division 1 TERM / AT-WILL 9/3/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Walker MS Division 2 POSN / DEMOTION 9/4/2014 WAIVED SETTLED

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Network Services Information

Technology WC / OTHER 9/8/2014 WITHDRAWN

HALL MONITOR Samuell HS Division 2 TERM / AT-WILL 9/10/2014 WAIVED 2/5/2015 DENIED 3/19/2015 SETTLED

SUBSTITUTE FOOD

SERVICE


Operations Services

POSN / REINSTATEMENT 9/12/2014 9/19/2014 DENIED

MANAGER Human Resource Operations


POSN / REINSTATEMENT 9/15/2014 WAIVED 10/7/2014 DENIED 11/13/2014 DENIED

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Storey MS Division 4 COMP / SALARY

DISPUTE 9/17/2014 10/15/2014 DENIED 12/8/2014 DENIED 2/18/2015 DENIED

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Rusk MS Division 3 COMP / SALARY

DISPUTE 9/18/2014 10/15/2014 DENIED 12/8/2014 DENIED 2/18/2015 DENIED

Page 2 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHERHCM - Alternative

Certification & Special Systems

Human Capital Management TERM / CONTRACT 9/18/2014 WAIVED 12/3/2014 GRANTED IN

PART

MANAGER Human Resource Operations

Human Capital Management TERM / CONTRACT 9/19/2014 WAIVED 10/7/2014 DENIED 11/13/2014 DENIED

FOOD SERVICE

ASSISTANTWeiss ES Division 1 WC / OTHER 9/22/2014

FOOD SERVICE

ASSISTANTWeiss ES Division 1 WC / OTHER 9/22/2014

SCHOOL MONITOR Seagoville HS Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 9/22/2014 WAIVED 11/19/2014 DENIED 1/15/2015 DENIED

TEACHER White HS Division 2 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 9/22/2014 1/8/2015 GRANTED IN

PART 4/2/2015

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 WC / LACK OF RESOURCES 9/23/2014 10/21/2014 DENIED

TEACHER ASSISTANT Pinkston HS Division 3 TERM / AT-WILL 9/25/2014 11/17/2014 DENIED SETTLED

PRINCIPAL North Dallas HS Division 3 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 9/26/2014 10/14/2014 GRANTED IN

PART

TEACHER Weiss ES Division 1 DISCIPLINE / CONCERN LETTER 9/26/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Spence MS Division 3 COMP / STIPEND 9/29/2014 10/13/2014 GRANTED IN PART

SUBSTITUTE HCM - Alternative


Human Capital Management COMP / OTHER 9/29/2014 11/5/2014 DENIED 3/18/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Dade MS Division 4 COMP / OTHER 9/29/2014 10/29/2014 DENIED

TEACHER ASSISTANT Molina HS Division 3 WC / OTHER 10/1/2014 10/16/2014 GRANTED IN

PART

Page 3 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



SUPERVISOR Food and Child Nutrition Services

Operations Services

POSN / POSITION RELEASE 10/3/2014 10/22/2014 DENIED 1/7/2015 GRANTED IN

PART 2/18/2015 GRANTED IN PART

TEACHER Rosemont Primary Division 1 WC / PLANNING PERIOD 10/3/2014 SETTLED

CUSTODIAN Douglass ES Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 10/6/2014 WAIVED 12/17/2014 DENIED

TEACHER ASSISTANT Bushman ES Division 4 WC / SUPERVISORY

CHAIN ISSUES 10/7/2014

TEACHER Quintanilla MS Division 3 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 10/7/2014 10/20/2014 DENIED 12/15/2014 DENIED 2/18/2015 GRANTED

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5

WC / UNPROFESSIONAL

BEHAVIOR / CODE OF ETHICS

10/8/2014 11/12/2014

TEACHER Walker MS Division 2 WC / OTHER 10/9/2014

TEACHER ASSISTANT Samuell HS Division 2 TERM / AT-WILL 10/9/2014 WAIVED 2/9/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

TEACHER Medrano ES Division 3WC / DISCRIMINATION


10/13/2014

TEACHER Cuellar ES Division 5 WC / OTHER 10/13/2014 10/24/2014 DENIED

INVESTIGATOR

Human Resource Operations


DISCIPLINE / INTERVENTION PLAN 10/13/2014 10/31/2014 DENIED 12/18/2014 DENIED 2/18/2015 DENIED

TEACHER ASSISTANT Jackson ES Division 4 POSN / POSITION

RELEASE 10/16/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER ASSISTANT Titche ES Division 2 POSN / POSITION


SCHOOL CLERK Spence MS Division 3 POSN / POSITION

RELEASE 10/16/2014 RESOLVED INFORMALLY

Page 4 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHER (A/C) Roosevelt HS Division 2 TERM / CONTRACT 10/17/2014 WAIVED 11/14/2014 DENIED

TEACHER Budd ES Division 2 APPRAISAL / SPOT OBSERVATION 10/20/2014 12/16/2014 GRANTED IN

PART

SCHOOL MONITOR Comstock MS Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 10/20/2014 1/28/2015 DENIED 4/7/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 DISCIPLINE / CONCERN LETTER 10/22/2014 11/20/2014

TEACHER Jones ES Division 1 DISCIPLINE / INTERVENTION PLAN 10/27/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Jones ES Division 1 DISCIPLINE / CONCERN LETTER 10/27/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Adams HS Division 2 POSN / POSITION RELEASE 10/27/2014 11/18/2014 DENIED 2/4/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Carter HS Division 1 WC / OTHER 10/28/2014

TEACHER Medrano ES Division 3WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)10/31/2014 WITHDRAWN

MANAGER Custodial Services Operations Services TERM / CONTRACT 10/31/2014 WAIVED 1/26/2015 GRANTED

SUPERVISOR Custodial Services Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 11/3/2014 WAIVED 1/26/2015 GRANTED

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 WC / DISCRIMINATION (PROTECTED CLASS) 11/3/2014

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 WC / RETALIATION 11/3/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 WC / LACK OF RESOURCES 11/3/2014 1/26/2015

Page 5 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



COUNSELOR Moreno ES Division 1 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 11/3/2014 1/20/2015 GRANTED IN

PART 3/20/2015 GRANTED IN PART

PARAPROFESSIONAL

SUPERVISOR


Operations Services

DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 11/4/2014

TEACHER ASSISTANT Blanton ES Division 2 POSN / POSITION


TEACHER Cuellar ES Division 5 WC / OTHER 11/6/2014 1/20/2015 DENIED 3/20/2015 GRANTED IN PART

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Burleson ES Division 5 DISCIPLINE /

INTERVENTION PLAN 11/7/2014 12/15/2014 DENIED

TEACHER Molina HS Division 3WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)11/7/2014 PENDING

TEACHER Lincoln HS Division 5WC / DISCRIMINATION


11/11/2014

TEACHER Sunset HS Division 1 WC / RETALIATION 11/12/2014 1/7/2015 GRANTED IN PART

POLICE OFFICER

Police and Security Services

Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 11/12/2014 PENDING

POLICE OFFICER

Police and Security Services

Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 11/12/2014 PENDING

DEPUTY CHIEF Internal Audit Board Services TERM / CONTRACT 11/13/2014 WAIVED 1/21/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Spence MS Division 3 TERM / CONTRACT 11/17/2014 WITHDRAWN

FOOD SERVICE

ASSISTANT


Operations Services WC / RETALIATION 11/17/2014

TEACHER Group Grievance Group Grievance COMP / CREDITABLE YEARS OF SERVICE 11/17/2014 12/10/2014 DENIED 4/1/2015

Page 6 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHER Franklin MS Division 3 BENEFITS / FMLA VIOLATION 11/21/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Allen ES Division 3 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 11/24/2014 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Pinkston HS Division 3 TERM / CONTRACT 11/25/2014

CLOSED BY ER DUE TO LACK OF ACTION

TEACHER Bushman ES Division 4 COMP / PAY DOCKED 12/2/2014 RESOLVED INFORMALLY

PRINCIPAL Seagoville North ES Division 5

WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED


TEACHER Rusk MS Division 3WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)12/9/2014

EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRAT

IVIE ASSISTANT

Operations Services

Operations Services


CLASS)12/19/2014 1/27/2015 GRANTED

TEACHER Seagoville North ES Division 5 DISCIPLINE /

CONCERN LETTER 12/19/2014 1/28/2015 GRANTED IN PART

TEACHER Holmes MS Division 1 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 1/5/2015 WITHDRAWN

CUSTODIAN Kimball HS Division 1 TERM / AT-WILL 1/5/2015 WITHDRAWN

SPECIALIST Maintenance and Facility Services

Operations Services TERM / CONTRACT 1/6/2015 WAIVED 2/4/2015 DENIED 3/19/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

CRAFTSPERSON


Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 1/6/2015 WAIVED 2/26/2015 WITHDRAWN

SCHOOL MONITOR Stockard MS Division 3 TERM / AT-WILL 1/6/2015 1/21/2015

TEACHER Hotchkiss ES Division 2WC / DISCRIMINATION


1/7/2015

Page 7 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHER Adams, Nathan ES Division 2 OTHER 1/12/2015

TEACHER ASSISTA McNair ES Division 1WC / DISCRIMINATION


1/13/2015

MEDIA ASSISTAN Edison MS Division 3 WC / OTHER 1/14/2015

REGISTRAR South Oak Cliff HS Division 4 WC / INTIMIDATION / BULLYING 1/14/2015 2/6/2015

TEACHER Rangel HS Division 4 WC / CURRICLUM 1/15/2015 1/28/2015 GRANTED

CUSTODIAN Custodial Services Operations Services


CLASS)1/15/2015 1/30/2015 DENIED

TEACHER ASSISTANT Roberts ES Division 4 TERM / AT-WILL 1/15/2015 2/4/2015 DENIED 4/1/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Highland Meadows ES Division 2 DISCIPLINE /

REPRIMAND LETTER 1/15/2015 2/3/2015 GRANTED IN PART

TEACHER Carver ES Division 3 DISCIPLINE / INTERVENTION PLAN 1/16/2015 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Cuellar ES Division 5 WC / RETALIATION 1/21/2015 WAIVED 3/20/2015 GRANTED IN PART

TEACHER Rangel HS Division 4 WC / OTHER 1/23/2015

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Bushman ES Division 4 BENEFITS / FMLA

VIOLATION 2/3/2015

PRINCIPAL Holmes MS Division 2 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 2/3/2015 3/3/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Highland Meadows ES Division 2 WC / OTHER 2/5/2015

Page 8 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHER Sunset HS Division 1WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED


LEADPERSONHCM - Alternative


Human Capital Management TERM / CONTRACT 2/10/2015 WAIVED

CERTIFICATION

LEADPERSON

HCM - Alternative Certification &

Special Systems

Human Capital Management TERM / CONTRACT 2/10/2015 3/3/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

REGISTRAR Townview Health Division 4 WC / INTIMIDATION / BULLYING 2/10/2015 3/4/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

TEACHER McShan ES Division 2 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 2/10/2015 3/17/2015

TEACHER A/C Seagoville MS Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 2/12/2015 3/19/2015 DENIED

TEACHER Manns MS Division 1 DISCIPLINE / INTERVENTION PLAN 2/12/2015 3/4/2015 DENIED

CAMPUS INSTRUCTION

AL COACHHotchkiss ES Division 2


CLASS)2/13/2015

CRAFTSPERSON


Operations Services COMP / OTHER 2/13/2015

TEACHER Carver ES Division 3 APPRAISAL / SPOT OBSERVATION 2/16/2015 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER McNair ES Division 1WC / DISCRIMINATION


2/17/2015

TEACHER Foster ES Division 1WC / DISCRIMINATION


2/18/2015 3/31/2015

EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRAT

IVIE ASSISTANT

Operations Services

Operations Services WC / RETALIATION 2/18/2015 4/14/2015

INSTRUCTIONAL COACH McShan ES Division 2 APPRAISAL / OTHER 2/23/2015 3/23/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

Page 9 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



CRAFTSPERSON


Operations Services DISCIPLINE / OTHER 2/26/2015 3/19/2015 GRANTED

CRAFTSPERSON


Operations Services DISCIPLINE / OTHER 2/26/2015 4/8/2015 GRANTED

FOOD SERVICE

ASSISTANT


Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 3/2/2015 WAIVED

TEACHER Madison HS Division 4 WC / OTHER 3/4/2015

TEACHER Marsh MS Division 2 APPRAISAL / SPOT OBSERVATION 3/6/2015 4/2/2015 GRANTED IN

PART

SUBSTITUTE HCM - Alternative



POSN / POSITION RELEASE 3/6/2015

TEACHER A/C North Dallas HS Division 3 WC / HARASSMENT (PROTECTED CLASS) 3/6/2015

TEACHER Spruce HS Division 5 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 3/6/2015 4/6/2015

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Lowe ES Division 2 DISCIPLINE /

REPRIMAND LETTER 3/16/2015

TEACHER Lagow ES Division 5WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)3/18/2015

SPECIALIST HCM - Talent Management

Human Capital Management TERM / AT-WILL 3/18/2015 3/31/2015 DENIED

TEACHER North Dallas HS Division 3 WC / OTHER 3/19/2015

TEACHER Edison MS Division 3 WC / OTHER 3/19/2015

TEACHER Budd ES Division 2 DISCIPLINE / CONCERN LETTER 3/24/2015

Page 10 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



TEACHER Franklin MS Division 3 OTHER 3/25/2015

ADMINSTRATIVE

ASSISTANT

Operations Services

Operations Services TERM / AT-WILL 3/25/2015

TEACHER A/C North Dallas HS Division 3WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)3/26/2015

TEACHER Sunset HS Division 1 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 3/27/2015

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Molina HS Division 3 3/30/2015

ACADEMIC FACILITATOR

Academic Improvement and

AccountabilityDivision 4 DISCIPLINE /

INTERVENTION PLAN 3/30/2015 4/10/2015

PRINCIPAL Holmes MS Division 2 APPRAISAL / OTHER 3/30/2015

TEACHER Lee, Umphrey ES Division 1 APPRAISAL / SPOT OBSERVATION 4/1/2015

TEACHER Highland Meadows ES Division 2 APPRAISAL / SPOT

OBSERVATION 4/2/2015 4/14/2015

TEACHER Donald ES Division 1 APPRAISAL / TEI 4/3/2015 WITHDRAWN

TEACHER Adamson HS Division 5WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)4/3/2015

ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL White HS Division 2 DISCIPLINE /

CONCERN LETTER 4/3/2015

TEACHER North Dallas HS Division 3 COMP / PAY DOCKED 4/7/2015

PRINCIPAL North Dallas HS Division 3 DISCIPLINE / REPRIMAND LETTER 4/7/2015

Page 11 of 12




DEPARTMENT

GRIEVANCE FILED


GRIEVANCE

LEVEL IDATE

RECEIVED

LEVEL IHEARING

HELDLEVEL I

DECISION

LEVEL IIHEARING

HELDLEVEL II

DECISION

LEVEL IIIACTUAL



PRINCIPAL Rosemont ES Division 1WC / HARASSMENT (NOT PROTECTED

CLASS)4/8/2015

TEACHER Carver ES Division 3 APPRAISAL / TEI 4/9/2015

TEACHER Lee, Umphrey ES Division 1 TERM / AT-WILL 4/9/2015

TEACHER McNair ES Division 1 APPRAISAL / TEI 4/10/2015

PSYCHOLOGIST

Psychological Services Student Services POSN /

REASSIGNMENT 4/10/2015

TEACHER A/C Comstock MS Division 5 TERM / AT-WILL 4/13/2015

PRINCIPAL North Dallas HS Division 3 DISCIPLINE / CONCERN LETTER 4/16/2015

Page 12 of 12

Documents

Report of Analysis - DISD Grievance System (2015-04-29)