40
Remote Sensing Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Technology for Scalable Information Networks Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Remote Sensing Technology for Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information NetworksScalable Information Networks

Douglas G. GoodinKansas State University

Geoffrey M. HenebryUniversity of Nebraska - Lincoln

Page 2: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Ecological Remote Sensing enables recurrent observation…

What is the role of remote sensing in ecological research?

Page 3: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

…at vast but variable spatial extents…

Page 4: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

…at multiple spatial scales…

Konza Prairie – 4 m resolution Konza Prairie – 1000 m resolution

Konza

Page 5: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

…and provides regional context

*Konza

Page 6: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Elements of Remote Sensing

Page 7: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Remote Sensing Technology is…

Hardware – sensors, computers, storage, distribution networks

Software – commercial, public domain,

user-created

“Wetware”– scientists, data managers

Page 8: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an ecological perspective)?

Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral

resolutions

System for data acquisition, processing,

distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction

Page 9: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Observed

Phenomenon

Spectral Region

Biogeophysical Variables

Representative

Sensors

Ranges of Resolutions

Solar Reflectance

Visible,

Near-IR,

Mid-IR

Albedo

fPAR

Land Cover

NPP

AVHRR SeaWiFS

MODIS MERIS

TM/ETM+ ALI IKONOS

AVIRIS MASTER

1 m – 1 km

<1 d – 18 d

1–228 bands

Terrestrial Emission

Mid-IR,

Thermal-IR,

Microwaves

Surface temperature

Surface moisture

SMMR SSM/I

AVHRR MODIS

ASTER TIMS

25 m - 25 km

<1 d – 3 d

1 – 50+ bands

Anthropogenic Radiation

RADAR,

LIDAR,

[SONAR]

Surface roughness

Soil moisture

Terrain

RADARSAT ASAR

JERS SIR-C

VCL LVIS

8 m – 150 m

18 d

<10 bands

Types of Earth Observing Sensors

Page 10: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Orbital Remote Sensing Systems

Page 11: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Landsat

US – Private/Gov’t

Moderate spatial resolution

1972-Present

Page 12: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

IKONOS

US – Private

1999 – present

Very fine spatial resolution (1-4m)

Page 13: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

NOAA – Polar Orbiter

US Government

Coarse spatial resolution, global coverage

1982 - Present

Page 14: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

RADARSAT

Canada – Gov’t/private

Imaging radar

1996 - Present

Page 15: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Terra/EO-1“Next-Generation” – Earth Observation

• Multi-instrument platform

• Multispectral, hyperspectral

Coordinated observationWith Landsat - 7

Page 16: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Aircraft Sensing Systems

• Flexible mission planning• Selectable spatial resolution• High cost (?)

Page 17: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

AVIRIS

• US Gov’t (NASA)

• Hyperspectral (224 bands)

• Multiple Aircraft (ER-2, Twin Otter)

Page 18: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Other Aircraft Systems

•Multiple (light) aircraft platforms

•(Relatively) modest cost

•Researcher control!

Page 19: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Close Range Remote Sensing

•A wide variety of multi/hyper spectral instruments

•Not just “ground truth”

•Researcher control

Page 20: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

TheData

Pyramid

Coordinated Observation at Multiple Scales

Page 21: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?

Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral

resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,

distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction

Page 22: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Observed

Phenomenon

Spectral Region

Biogeophysical Variables

Representative

Sensors

Ranges of Resolutions

Solar Reflectance

Visible,

Near-IR,

Mid-IR

Albedo

fPAR

Land Cover

NPP

AVHRR SeaWiFS

MODIS MERIS

TM/ETM+ ALI IKONOS

AVIRIS MASTER

1 m – 1 km

<1 d – 18 d

1–228 bands

Terrestrial Emission

Mid-IR,

Thermal-IR,

Microwaves

Surface temperature

Surface moisture

SMMR SSM/I

AVHRR MODIS

ASTER TIMS

25 m - 25 km

<1 d – 3 d

1 – 50+ bands

Anthropogenic Radiation

RADAR,

LIDAR,

[SONAR]

Surface roughness

Soil moisture

Terrain

RADARSAT ASAR

JERS SIR-C

VCL LVIS

8 m – 150 m

18 d

<10 bands

Types of Earth Observing Sensors

Page 23: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Spatial Resolution

Coarse FineModerate

Page 24: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Spectral Resolution

Panchromatic: 1 spectral band - very broad

Multispectral: 4-10 spectral bands - broad

Superspectral: 10-30 spectral bands - variable

Hyperspectral: >30 spectral bands - narrow

The challenge of hyperspectra is to reduce dense, voluminous, redundant data into a compact, effective suite of superspectral bands and indices for retrieval of biogeophysical fields.

Page 25: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?

Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral

resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,

distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction

Page 26: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Acquisition

Processing

Distribution/Storage

Data Handling System - Hardware

Page 27: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Data analysis system – linkages are critical

Archiving/Distribution

Researchers/Groups

Page 28: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

The MODIS systemAn example

Page 29: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?

Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral

resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,

distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction

Page 30: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

NDVI = (NIR - Red)/(NIR + Red)

R = f(,) sin cos d d

0 = [((i=1..N)xi2)/N] * [(C/k) * (sin )/(sin ref)]

Retrieval of Biogeophysical Quantities & Indices

EVI =2.5*(NIR-Red)/(L+NIR+C1*Red-C2*Blue)

Page 31: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Calibration to derive physical quantities: an engineering problem

Does the instrument give the correct physical data?

Is the instrument’s range & sensitivity appropriate for the application?

Cross-sensor calibration

Page 32: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Calibration to derive ecological quantities: a scientific problem

Can the sensor data yield ecologically relevant relationships?

NOT ground “truth” – ground level observation RESCALING

Empirical relationships are site & time specific but reflectance, emission, and backscattering are interactions not intrinsic properties of observable entities

Page 33: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Calibration to derive ecological quantities: a scientific problem

Top-down vs. bottom-up modeling perspectives

Model invertibility

Model robustness

Page 34: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

(4) June 1998 sampling

NDVI = 0.1226(ln{total aboveground biomass}) - 0.3171

r2 = 0.6075

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

total aboveground biomass ln(g/m2)

ND

VI

Moss-Annual

Not Moss-Annual

Linear (Not Moss-Annual)

Empirical Model – Top down

Page 35: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Analytical Models – Bottom up

Page 36: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?

Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral

resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,

distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction

Page 37: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

To enable ecological forecasting, we need monitoring strategies for

change detection: perceiving the differences

change quantification: measuring the magnitudes of the differences

change assessment: determining whether the differences are significant

change attribution: identifying or inferring the proximate cause of the change

Page 38: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Observations

Ground segmentAcquisition, processing,

storage, & archiving

Ground segmentAcquisition, processing,

storage, & archiving

Retrieval of biogeophysical variables

Spatio-Spectral-Temporal

analysisDefinitions of nominal trajectories and

estimates of uncertainty

Assimilation of current observational datastreams

Change detection Change quantification

Change attribution Change assessment

Ecological Questions &Hypotheses

Information for Ecological Forecasting

Page 39: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tuning the macroscope of remote sensing to support ecological inference requires an integrated and sustained

approach to technology & theory

Page 40: Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information Networks Douglas G. Goodin Kansas State University Geoffrey M. Henebry University of Nebraska - Lincoln

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

DGG acknowledges support from NASA EPSCoR subcontract 12860.

GMH acknowledges support from NSF #9696229/0196445 & #0131937.