Upload
virginia-thornton
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Remote Sensing Technology for Remote Sensing Technology for Scalable Information NetworksScalable Information Networks
Douglas G. GoodinKansas State University
Geoffrey M. HenebryUniversity of Nebraska - Lincoln
Ecological Remote Sensing enables recurrent observation…
What is the role of remote sensing in ecological research?
…at vast but variable spatial extents…
…at multiple spatial scales…
Konza Prairie – 4 m resolution Konza Prairie – 1000 m resolution
Konza
…and provides regional context
*Konza
Elements of Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing Technology is…
Hardware – sensors, computers, storage, distribution networks
Software – commercial, public domain,
user-created
“Wetware”– scientists, data managers
What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an ecological perspective)?
Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral
resolutions
System for data acquisition, processing,
distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction
Observed
Phenomenon
Spectral Region
Biogeophysical Variables
Representative
Sensors
Ranges of Resolutions
Solar Reflectance
Visible,
Near-IR,
Mid-IR
Albedo
fPAR
Land Cover
NPP
AVHRR SeaWiFS
MODIS MERIS
TM/ETM+ ALI IKONOS
AVIRIS MASTER
1 m – 1 km
<1 d – 18 d
1–228 bands
Terrestrial Emission
Mid-IR,
Thermal-IR,
Microwaves
Surface temperature
Surface moisture
SMMR SSM/I
AVHRR MODIS
ASTER TIMS
25 m - 25 km
<1 d – 3 d
1 – 50+ bands
Anthropogenic Radiation
RADAR,
LIDAR,
[SONAR]
Surface roughness
Soil moisture
Terrain
RADARSAT ASAR
JERS SIR-C
VCL LVIS
8 m – 150 m
18 d
<10 bands
Types of Earth Observing Sensors
Orbital Remote Sensing Systems
Landsat
US – Private/Gov’t
Moderate spatial resolution
1972-Present
IKONOS
US – Private
1999 – present
Very fine spatial resolution (1-4m)
NOAA – Polar Orbiter
US Government
Coarse spatial resolution, global coverage
1982 - Present
RADARSAT
Canada – Gov’t/private
Imaging radar
1996 - Present
Terra/EO-1“Next-Generation” – Earth Observation
• Multi-instrument platform
• Multispectral, hyperspectral
Coordinated observationWith Landsat - 7
Aircraft Sensing Systems
• Flexible mission planning• Selectable spatial resolution• High cost (?)
AVIRIS
• US Gov’t (NASA)
• Hyperspectral (224 bands)
• Multiple Aircraft (ER-2, Twin Otter)
Other Aircraft Systems
•Multiple (light) aircraft platforms
•(Relatively) modest cost
•Researcher control!
Close Range Remote Sensing
•A wide variety of multi/hyper spectral instruments
•Not just “ground truth”
•Researcher control
TheData
Pyramid
Coordinated Observation at Multiple Scales
What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?
Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral
resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,
distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction
Observed
Phenomenon
Spectral Region
Biogeophysical Variables
Representative
Sensors
Ranges of Resolutions
Solar Reflectance
Visible,
Near-IR,
Mid-IR
Albedo
fPAR
Land Cover
NPP
AVHRR SeaWiFS
MODIS MERIS
TM/ETM+ ALI IKONOS
AVIRIS MASTER
1 m – 1 km
<1 d – 18 d
1–228 bands
Terrestrial Emission
Mid-IR,
Thermal-IR,
Microwaves
Surface temperature
Surface moisture
SMMR SSM/I
AVHRR MODIS
ASTER TIMS
25 m - 25 km
<1 d – 3 d
1 – 50+ bands
Anthropogenic Radiation
RADAR,
LIDAR,
[SONAR]
Surface roughness
Soil moisture
Terrain
RADARSAT ASAR
JERS SIR-C
VCL LVIS
8 m – 150 m
18 d
<10 bands
Types of Earth Observing Sensors
Spatial Resolution
Coarse FineModerate
Spectral Resolution
Panchromatic: 1 spectral band - very broad
Multispectral: 4-10 spectral bands - broad
Superspectral: 10-30 spectral bands - variable
Hyperspectral: >30 spectral bands - narrow
The challenge of hyperspectra is to reduce dense, voluminous, redundant data into a compact, effective suite of superspectral bands and indices for retrieval of biogeophysical fields.
What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?
Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral
resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,
distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction
Acquisition
Processing
Distribution/Storage
Data Handling System - Hardware
Data analysis system – linkages are critical
Archiving/Distribution
Researchers/Groups
The MODIS systemAn example
What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?
Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral
resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,
distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction
NDVI = (NIR - Red)/(NIR + Red)
R = f(,) sin cos d d
0 = [((i=1..N)xi2)/N] * [(C/k) * (sin )/(sin ref)]
Retrieval of Biogeophysical Quantities & Indices
EVI =2.5*(NIR-Red)/(L+NIR+C1*Red-C2*Blue)
Calibration to derive physical quantities: an engineering problem
Does the instrument give the correct physical data?
Is the instrument’s range & sensitivity appropriate for the application?
Cross-sensor calibration
Calibration to derive ecological quantities: a scientific problem
Can the sensor data yield ecologically relevant relationships?
NOT ground “truth” – ground level observation RESCALING
Empirical relationships are site & time specific but reflectance, emission, and backscattering are interactions not intrinsic properties of observable entities
Calibration to derive ecological quantities: a scientific problem
Top-down vs. bottom-up modeling perspectives
Model invertibility
Model robustness
(4) June 1998 sampling
NDVI = 0.1226(ln{total aboveground biomass}) - 0.3171
r2 = 0.6075
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
total aboveground biomass ln(g/m2)
ND
VI
Moss-Annual
Not Moss-Annual
Linear (Not Moss-Annual)
Empirical Model – Top down
Analytical Models – Bottom up
What are the Elements of Remote Sensing Technology (from an Ecological perspective)?
Orbital, airborne, near-ground sensor systems Ranges of spatial, temporal, & spectral
resolutions System for data acquisition, processing,
distribution, & archiving Algorithms to retrieve biogeophysical variables Theory for interpretation & prediction
To enable ecological forecasting, we need monitoring strategies for
change detection: perceiving the differences
change quantification: measuring the magnitudes of the differences
change assessment: determining whether the differences are significant
change attribution: identifying or inferring the proximate cause of the change
Observations
Ground segmentAcquisition, processing,
storage, & archiving
Ground segmentAcquisition, processing,
storage, & archiving
Retrieval of biogeophysical variables
Spatio-Spectral-Temporal
analysisDefinitions of nominal trajectories and
estimates of uncertainty
Assimilation of current observational datastreams
Change detection Change quantification
Change attribution Change assessment
Ecological Questions &Hypotheses
Information for Ecological Forecasting
Tuning the macroscope of remote sensing to support ecological inference requires an integrated and sustained
approach to technology & theory
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
DGG acknowledges support from NASA EPSCoR subcontract 12860.
GMH acknowledges support from NSF #9696229/0196445 & #0131937.