32
Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of /r/

Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of /r/

Page 2: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Project on Cross-Dialectal Comprehension: Gating Experiment 2

Word Phrase Sentence

1. _________ ________________ ___________________________

2. _________ ________________ ___________________________

3. _________ ________________ ___________________________

4. _________ ________________ ___________________________

5. _________ ________________ ___________________________

6. _________ ________________ ___________________________

7. _________ ________________ ___________________________

8. _________ ________________ ___________________________

9. _________ ________________ ___________________________

10. ________ ________________ ___________________________

Page 3: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift

sit

set

satate

seat

sight

Page 4: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift

hit

kids

set

bed

Dannygrade

beatin’

Guy

wipin’

Page 5: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift

Page 6: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift in the vowel system of Thelma M., 31,

Birmingham, TS 341

Page 7: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift in the vowel system of Thelma M., 31, Birmingham, TS 341

Page 8: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift in the vowel system of Lucy C., 35, Chattanooga, Tennessee, TS 612

Page 9: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift in the vowel system of Lucy C., 35, Chattanooga,

Tennessee, TS 612

Page 10: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift

beatin’

grade

Guy

wipin’

hit

kids

set

bed

Danny

beatin’

Page 11: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Monophthongal /ay/ in five of Belle M., 67 [1995], Birmingham TS 340

Page 12: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Monophthongal /ay/ in five of Sheldon M, 31, [1996], Lubbock TX, TS 542

Page 13: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Monophthongal /ay/ in five of Matthew D., 45, [1996], Charlotte NC, TS 483

Page 14: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Map 18.2. The South defined by monophthongization of /ay/

Page 15: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Fig. 18.1. Percent monophthongization of /ay/

Page 16: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Map 18.4. Monophthongization of /ay/ in 1940s and 1990s

Page 17: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Map 18.6. Stages 2 and 3 of the Southern Shift

Page 18: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Fig. 18.2. Outer limits of stage 1 of the Southern Shift

Page 19: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Figure 18.2. The second stage of the Southern Shift

Page 20: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Stage 2 of the Southern Shift

Page 21: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Figure 18.4. The third stage of the Southern Shift

Page 22: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Fig. 18.9. The Southern Shift of /ay/, /ey/ and /iy/ highlighted in the normalized means of 402

Telsur speakers displayed by Plotnik Major

Page 23: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Fig. 18.6. Percent back upglide with /oh/

Page 24: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Figure 18.5. The Southern Shift and the low back upglide

Page 25: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Fig. 18.6. Percent back upglide with /oh/

Page 26: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Southern Shift

sit

set

satate

seat

sight

Southern England, Australia, New Zealand, Outer Banks (U.S.)

Southern U.S.

Page 27: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Southern Shift correlations

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation: NonSouthEYC2 IYC2 AY0GN AYGN IYC1 EYC1

EYC2 1IYC2 0.323 1AY0GN 0.007 0.039 1AYGN -0.14 -0.06 0.052 1IYC1 -0.16 0.31 -0.08 0.12 1EYC1 0.055 -0.02 0.029 0.201 0.232 1

Pearson Product-Moment Correlation: SouthEYC2 IYC2 AY0GN AYGN IYC1 EYC1

EYC2 1IYC2 0.769 1AY0GN -0.42 -0.32 1AYGN -0.57 -0.47 0.518 1IYC1 -0.44 -0.54 0.281 0.412 1EYC1 -0.56 -0.36 0.204 0.434 0.49 1

Page 28: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Areas of borderers settlement

[Hackett 1989]

Page 29: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Settlement patterns of four regional cultures

Yankee Virginia Quaker Upland South

Settlement Towns Plantations Farm Isolatedvillages clusters

House location Roadside Setback Corner-Creek

clusters & spring

Internal Low Moderate High Very high migration

Persistence 75-96% 50-75% 40-60% 25-40% David Hackett Fisher, Albion’s Seed, p. 814

Page 30: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Slave and free states

Page 31: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

Confederate States of America[light green: claimed but no formal control

Page 32: Remnants of disappearing Southern dialect features: areas maintaining the distinction of four vs. for, dew vs. do, which vs. witch and vocalization of

The Midland and South re-defined on the basis of phonology