Upload
emma-phillips
View
55
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ernest Hemingway's edict on religion through the priest, and Henry
Citation preview
Phillips 1#20385789
Emma Phillips
Chad Wrigglesworth
ENGL 344
March 1, 2013
God has No Place in War
If ever there was an exigency for truth to be stated about a novel, let it be that A
Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway illustrates above all else the emotional turmoil of World
War I. The minimalist style of the novel allows the reader to inherit the full scope of protagonist
Frederick Henry’s experiences without forceful digestion of one feeling, leaving the reader at
liberty to interpret Hemingway’s powerful manner of saying more with less. That said, religion
in the novel, though an understated theme is a subject of deep expression. The use of the
Priest, the instances of prayer and Henry’s opportunity to play God at the fire, are examples of
not only Frederick’s struggle with himself, but Hemingway’s own views on the separation of
God and religion. While religion is used to comfort Henry throughout A Farewell to Arms, it
ultimately promulgates Hemingway’s edict on the absence of God in man, and man in war.
Frederick Henry in no way rejects the idea of religion. He and Catherine share a love
where she says that she is not a religious person but goes on to say, “you are my religion.
You’re all I’ve got” (Hemingway 116). The idea of love as a religion is confirmed by Count Greffi
over a game of billiards when he reminds Henry “not to forget that [love] is a religious
Phillips 2#20385789
feeling“(263). The spiritual void that reappears throughout A Farewell to Arms is not the lack of
religion, but the lack of God.
The priest needs to been seen so potently as a religious man that he does not even
receive a name throughout the novel other than “the priest”. This could be that he was
supposed to be a generic priest, but the reader knows much about his character as he explains
where he is from, his family, and invites Henry to visit his family. Therefore his title with no
name is for the sake of sanctity. A name would portray him as a man in the war, and not the
religion he represents. This is important because he needs to be seen as a Godly man, so that
the reader can see, even as a priest, how disconnected he appears to be with God during his
interactions with Henry. Throughout the novel he is merely a supportive conversationalist with
Henry rather than a spiritual figure who preaches the power and wrath of God. When the priest
visits Henry at the hospital in Milan he gives Henry advice on love and happiness, “when you
love you wish to do things for. You wish to sacrifice for. You wish to serve” (72). His character
acts as a confidant for the Lieutenant to exchange ideas on the war, and on experiencing love.
What is interesting about the interactions between Henry and the priest is who it is
initiating the conversation. For most other conversations Henry has, it is always the other
participant who engages first in the conversation. This notion extends from the other soldiers,
nurses, and Rinaldi and even to Catherine. The only character that Henry genuinely engages in
questions and discussions with is the priest. This is exemplar of Henry’s curiosity and inquisitive
nature about religion. He asked the priest “did you always love God?” (72), so even though he
says he is only religious “at night”, he still trusts the priest and has a genuine relationship with
Phillips 3#20385789
him unlike the other soldiers. Henry states a clear opinion about religion and God in
conversation with the priest when he says that “it is in defeat we become Christian” (178), then
goes on to clarify that he doesn’t mean “technically Christian” but rather “Our Lord”. As in
belief in the Lord will only merit failure, or submission to an absolute power is only for people
who are “beaten” or too feeble to do anything but obey the rules of the church.
Another aspect that demonstrates how Hemingway writes the absence of God in man
can be seen through the examples of prayer provided throughout the novel. While the
conversations with the priest do capture Henry’s interest in faith, they are found wanting when
the priest himself says he wants the war to end. The examples of prayer lend no difference to
the discovery of God in the war as they are never answered. When the soldier, Passini, loses his
legs in the bombing he prays, and death finds him still. The necklace that Catherine gives Henry
of St. Anthony could be considered a hope to God for safety for him, thus constituting faith in
God’s ability but he at first doesn’t want to wear it, and then shows no remorse or superstition
in losing it when he gets wounded. To add insult to injury, Catherine later admits that she gave
the necklace to Henry “for luck” saying that “someone gave it to her” (116), thus implying that
safety in God is mere chance further denouncing the existence of God.
For the character of Henry, his need for prayer arises when Catherine is hemorrhaging.
He begs “Don’t let her die. Oh, God, please don’t let her die. I’ll do anything for you if you won’t
let her die” (330). If Catherine had survived it could have been considered an answered prayer,
instilling support in the power of God. Her death allows Hemingway’s disbelief in the God’s
good will among men to resonate with the reader in anger, and disbelief at the loss of Henry’s
Phillips 4#20385789
love. It is almost as if Hemingway wants to leave the readers with such misdirected anger at the
loss of the baby, Catherine’s death, and Henry’s stiff departure into the rain that they too will
question God’s presence among man.
If conversations with the priest and unanswered prayer are not enough to convey a
message of a missing God, perhaps the most poignant moment in the novel is when Henry finds
himself at the camp:
I put a log on top of the fire and it was full of ants. As it commenced to burn, the ants swarmedout and went first toward the centre where the firewas; then turned back and ran toward the end. Whenthere were enough on the end they fell off into thefire...I remember thinking at the time that it was theend of the world and a splendid chance to be a messiahand lift the log off the fire... but I did not do anythingbut throw a tin cup of water on the log, so that I wouldhave the cup empty to put whiskey in...(327-28)
In this instance Henry is clearly behaving as a God-like figure. He recognizes that he is in a
position of power and has the opportunity to save a myriad of lives but instead of pulling the
log out of the fire, he douses it with a cup of water. The scene in its entirety is representative of
Frederick and Catherine’s story in the war. They were thrown into the fires of war, and
originally swarmed to it falling in love, but upon seeing the death of heat awaiting them, they
tried to turn back and run away. Only, like the ants to fall off the log into the fire, and into
Catherine and the baby’s death at the mercy of God as an onlooker. Henry while playing God
realizes that he could save the ants, but takes an apathetic approach instead, acting in the same
manner of the God of the novel. By remaining decisively callous, Henry perpetuates the idea of
an all-seeing God with the power to provide for people who chooses not to, for no reason in
Phillips 5#20385789
particular. Hemingway begs the question of who has control over the lives of Catherine, Henry,
and Rinaldi.
The idea of God missing from a war is understandable because of the way it destroys
the spirit and will of those fighting it. At the beginning of the novel the soldiers are motivated,
and make fun of the priest as a representation of the church for wanting the war to be over.
They are optimistic for the outcome, but soon lose the feeling that they can win. Overall this
idea of no God translates into no greater power for good among men. The priest represents a
religion by the end of the novel that wants the war to be over because there is no trace of God
in the turmoil. Prayer is a continual alienation from God as Hemingway writes no success for
the requests of the characters. Lastly, when Henry has the opportunity to save lives he instead
emphasizes the omnipotence of death over the power of God by not taking the log out of the
fire. The character of Henry gleans much comfort from religion; good conversation, good
advice, good luck, but cannot fathom God being in man when man is in war. This makes Henry
such an attractive character and Hemingway an attractive writer because they are not alone in
their questioning.
Phillips 6#20385789
Works Cited
Hemingway, Ernest. A Farewell to Arms. New York: Scribner, 1929. Print.