16
Presentati on Engineer Relative analysis 1 Simulation Train Speed R elative Airflow Train configuration Track grade and curvature Factors always affecting train speed Legend: Factors inside a tunnel Locomotive Performance (inside and outide)

Relative analysis

  • Upload
    elan

  • View
    53

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Relative analysis. Simulation. Relative analysis. Subway Environment Simulation (SES) SES 2000 One Dimensional Analysis Aerodynamic and thermodynamic Freight rail projects Moffat Mount Shaughnessy Mount Macdonald/Rogers Pass Mullan Stampede Pass. Relative analysis. Model inputs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Relative analysis

1

Simulation

Train Speed Relative Airflow

Train configuration

Track grade and curvature

Factors always affecting train

speed

Legend:Factors inside a

tunnel

Locomotive Performance

(inside and outide)

Page 2: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

2

Relative analysis

Subway Environment Simulation (SES)

SES 2000– One Dimensional Analysis– Aerodynamic and thermodynamic– Freight rail projects

Moffat Mount Shaughnessy Mount Macdonald/Rogers Pass Mullan Stampede Pass

Page 3: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Relative analysis

3

Global Tunnel

Local Middle Consist

Internal Loco Model

Diesel Engine

Radiator

Emissions

Models

Page 4: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

4

Model inputs Tunnel geometry Friction factor Calibration

Relative analysis

Page 5: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Relative analysis

Locomotive data– Field test data (Other projects)– CFD Simulations (Computational

fluid dynamics)– Past experience

Locomotive input– Heat release– Emission rates– Derating

5

Page 6: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Relative analysis Input constant speed

6

CONSTANTTrain Speed Relative Airflow

Train configuration

Track grade and curvature

Factors always affecting train

speed

Legend:Factors inside a

tunnel

Locomotive Performance

(inside and outide)

Page 7: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Input constant speed Relative airflow to locomotives

Quantity Quality

7

Relative analysisSimulation – Inputs and outputs

Page 8: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

ResultsLead Loco, Relative Airflow airflow

8

Worst-case grain 19 kph (12 mph)

Double stack 24 kph (15 mph)

Page 9: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

ResultsLead Loco, Relative Airflow airflow

9

Worst-case grain 19 kph (12 mph)

Double stack 24 kph (15 mph)

Double stack 28 kph (17.5 mph)

Double stack 32 kph (20 mph)

Page 10: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

ResultsMid loco consist, relative airflow

10

Worst-case grain 19 kph (12 mph)

Double stack 24 kph (15 mph)

Page 11: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

ResultsMid loco consist, relative airflow

11

Worst-case grain 19 kph (12 mph)

Double stack 24 kph (15 mph)

Double stack 28 kph (17.5 mph)

Double stack 32 kph (20 mph)

Page 12: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Naturally ventilated tunnels Train performance in tunnel

12

Train Speed Relative Airflow

Train configuration

Track grade and curvature

Factors always affecting train

speed

Legend:Factors inside a

tunnel

Locomotive Performance

(inside and outide)

Page 13: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Results

13

Factor Affects Influenced byVent Analysis

Worse-case grain

Double stack

Double stack

Double stack, Portal Door

1. Speed Input 12 15 17.5 15 mphTime in tunnel Output 640 515 440 515 SecondsMomentum - - Better Better Better RelativeRelative airflow Output Worse Better Better Relative

Locomotive performance -

2. Lead consist performance in tunnel Worse Bett er Better Relative

SpeedRelative airflow quantity* Output 46 42 49 124 m^3/sRelative airflow quality Output - Same Same Same RelativeNumber of locomotives Input - Same Same Same Relative

3. Locomotive performance of consists outside tunnel Better Bett er Better RelativeSpeed -

Train configuration No effect - Better Better Better RelativeConsist configuration No effect - Same Same Same Relative

4. Mid-train consist performance in tunnel Mid Rear Rear Rear LocationSpeed

Relative airflow quantity* Output 46 42 49 42# m^3/sRelative airflow quality Output - Better Better Better RelativeNumber of locomotives Input - Same Same Same Relative

* Lowest simulated value # Probably higher in reality because of increased train speed

Page 14: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Results

Double stack at 15 mph– Relative airflow less– 3D effects unknown– All other factors better

Double stack at 17.5 mph– All factors better

14

Page 15: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Agenda What is a long tunnel? Naturally ventilated tunnels Notched tunnel Relative analysis Results Conclusions

– A Tunnel: Monitor speeds less than 24 kph (17.5 mph)

– Limits in naturally ventilated tunnel

15

133

Page 16: Relative analysis

Presentation Engineer

Questions? What is a long tunnel? Naturally ventilated tunnels Notched tunnel Relative analysis Results Conclusions

16

133

Justin Edenbaum [email protected]