29
Relational Leadership Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders October 20, 2010 A Political Effectiveness Work Group Presentation

Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Relational Leadership

Building Politically Effective Relationships with StakeholdersOctober 20, 2010

A Political Effectiveness Work Group Presentation

Page 2: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

WELCOME!OVERVIEW OF COOPERATIVE EXTENSION’S POLITICAL EFFECTIVENESS EFFORT

Dan Wilson, Professor Emeritus

Page 3: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

•WHAT WE SAY ABOUT PE • “Doing good work” is not sufficient to build

awareness or political support • WE must take the leadership roles in building

awareness and political support for CE• Less than ½ of county offices (and many

individuals) have a strategy for communicating value of CE – building relationships with stakeholders

Page 5: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

EVALUATION

• What are some of your “take homes” from this session?

• How could this session have been improved?• What further PE resources and training are

needed?• What should be addressed/included in CE’s

PE Action Plan?

Page 6: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

POLITICAL EFFECTIVENESS:THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY

Rosemary Potter, Director of Government Relations, UW Colleges and UW-Extension

Pete Kling, Community Resource Development Agent, St. Croix County

Kristine Zaballos, Editor, Cooperative Extension PublicationsPamela Seelman, Public Information Specialist, Dean’s Office

Page 7: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

What is your definition of political effectiveness?

Page 8: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Political effectiveness is…

• Responsive educational programs• Strong relationships with key decision makers• Effective communications• Fiscal awareness and political sensitivity

Page 9: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Responsive educational programs:Have you done any of the following?

• Involved elected officials, partners, clients and friends in program planning?

• Incorporate UW system resources into program planning?

• Consider potential political impacts when planning programs?

• Other?

Page 10: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Strong relationships with key decision makers:Have you done any of the following?

• Developed a database of influential decision-makers and key supporters?

• Developed and maintain professional networks?• Worked to establish relationships with elected

officials beyond the Ag and Extension Committee?

• Worked with other county, state and federal agencies to establish collaborative relationships?

• Other?

Page 11: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Effective communications

• Developed a strategic marketing or promotions plan?

• Invite key decision makers to participate in Cooperative Extension events?

• Work with traditional and social media outlets to communicate the value of your programming?

• Know how to explain the work of your colleagues as well as your own?

• Other

Page 12: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Fiscal awareness and political sensitivity

• Maintain communications with people who are influential in budget development and adoption?

• Share impacts, outcomes, successes and financial benefits of your work with key decision makers?

• Seek to understand the structure and nuance of the budgeting process?

• Know who’s influential to the budget process and know what their interests are?

• Other?

Page 13: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

THREE LEVELS OF COMMUNICATION FOR RELATIONAL LEADERSHIP

Kelly Haverkampf, Community Development Educator, Vilas County

Page 14: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Three Levels of Communication for Relational Leadership

Level Relationship Principle Reaction

1. Belief Credibility I believe youI don’t believe you

2. Understanding Quality of information translation

I understand youI don’t understand you

3. Agreement Values, position, politics

I agree with youI don’t agree with you

Page 15: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Working on Real Situations

Page 16: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

RESPONSIVE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Eloisa Gomez, Director of the Milwaukee County Cooperative Extension OfficeKaren Nelson, Columbia County Cooperative Extension Office Department Head and 4-H Youth Development Educator

Page 17: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

STRONG RELATIONSHIPS WITH KEY DECISION MAKERS

Kelly Haverkampf, Community Development Educator, Vilas County

Page 18: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Mapping your Circle of Influence

• List your regular contacts in your job or position• Are they decision makers or influencers?• What are your communication points with the

influencers?• What are their communication points with the

decision makers?• How consistent are the messages along each

communication line?

Page 19: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

County-based Community

Development Educator

County Board

County Extension

Committee

County Department

Head

UWEX Administration

UWEX Program Leader

State Legislators

UWEX District Director

Program Participants

and Volunteers

Page 20: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

Pamela Seelman, Public Information Specialist, Dean’s Office

Page 21: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Effective communications are…

• Honest and open communications with decision makers about the mutual benefits of our partnership.

Page 22: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Communications matter!

• Engage in open and ongoing dialog• Communicate with multiple audiences • Explain the value, breadth of our programs• Share success stories, impacts and outcomes• Use evaluation tools and reports to

demonstrate accountability, program impacts

Page 23: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

CHANGING OUR BLUEPRINT

Rosemary Potter, Director of Government Relations, UW Colleges and UW-Extension

432 N. Lake Street608 263-7678

[email protected]

www.uwex.uwc.edu/government/

Page 24: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Changing our Blueprint

Page 25: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Changing our Blueprint

•We are Resourceful

•Keep an Open Perspective•

•Continue the Conversation

Page 26: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Changing our Blueprint

• Make Requests

• All Perspectives Are Legitimate

• Don’t Take Things Personally

Page 27: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

Changing our Blueprint

• “I’m a beginner at…”

• “Help me understand…”

Page 28: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

What are your challenges, situations?

Page 29: Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stakeholders

EVALUATION

• What are some of your “take homes” from this session?

• How could this session have been improved?• What further PE resources and training are

needed?• What should be addressed/included in CE’s

PE Action Plan?