REHVA Supporters Seminar, Brussels,10.12 2009, Jarek Kurnitski Establishing an annex for EPBD-related CEN-standards for buildings with high energy efficiency

REHVA Supporters Seminar, Brussels,10.12 2009, Jarek Kurnitski

Establishing an annex for EPBD-related CEN-standards for buildings with high energy efficiency and good indoor environment

LOW ENERGY COOLING and THERMAL COMFORT

Jarek Kurnitski, D.Sc., Adjunct ProfessorSitra, the Finnish Innovation Fund

Helsinki University of Technology, HVAC-Technology

http://www.thermco.org/

Participant name Short name

Fraunhofer ISE ISE

PSE GmbH PSE

University of Karlsruhe UniKarl

Technical University of Denmark DTU

Helsinki University of Technology TKK

University of La Rochelle ULR

University of Athens NKUA

Czech Technical University CTUP

Politecnico di Milano eERG

Technical University of Civil Engineering - Bucharest

TUCEB


Objectives

Low energy cooling can mean limited capacity cooling (groundwater, earth to air, slab cooling, night ventilative cooling, etc passive) which is somewhere in between air conditioning and free running buildings not addressed in the standards (EN 15251, ASHRAE 55)

EN 15251 deals with buildings which either have mechanical cooling (full cooling capacity, PMV index) or buildings without mechanical cooling systems (adaptive approach)

ThermCo project:- evaluated how do people perceive “limited cooling capacity”

- assessed the applicability of adapted approach for such buildings

- formulated recommendations for revision of EN 15251 regarding thermal comfort criteria for buildings with low energy cooling in summer

- prepared REHVA guidebook on low energy cooling


Background of the project

Large German study (Pfafferott et al. 2007) with 12 low-energy office buildings with ‘‘mixed-mode systems’’ such as hybrid day ventilation, enhanced night ventilation, earth-to-air heat exchanger and TABS with ground cooling

Such buildings can show low energy use, but they don’t keep temperature (especially with earth-to-air) due to limited cooling/ventilation capacity and control

Can adaptive thermal comfort model used in such buildings?


PMV modelEN 15251, ISO 7730, CR 1752, ASHRAE 55

a cornerstone of thermal comfort theory leading to target values to be achieved with heating/ cooling season design temperatures depending on indoor climate category (activity & clothing)

Includes behavioral adaptation through clothing value (1.0 clo in winter/0.5 clo in summer)

Summer WinterCategory (cooling) (heating)

I (A) 24.5 ± 1 C 22 ± 1 CII (B) 24.5 ± 1.5 C 22 ± 2 CIII (C) 24.5 ± 2.5 C 22 ± 3 C

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Op

era

tiv

e t

em

pe

ratu

re,

°C

Outdoor running mean temperature, °C

I

II

III


Adaptive modelEN 15251, ASHRAE 55

For free running buildings with openable windows

Arguably people have lower expectations in such buildings and adapt to accept higher temperatures (productivity data is not available from the adaption studies)

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Op

era

tiv

e t

em

pe

ratu

re,

°C


I

II

III


11 %

2 %

12 %

5 %

28 %

12 %

50 %

81 %

100 %

Thermal environment, heating season

Thermal environment, cooling season

Indoor air quality

IV III II I

PMV vs. adaptive

16,016,517,017,518,018,519,019,520,020,521,021,522,022,523,023,524,024,525,025,526,026,527,027,528,028,529,029,530,030,531,0

-22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

indo

or te

mpe

ratu

re, °

C

outdoor temperature running mean, °C

Category I, II and III limits and indoor temperature from column C

1 3

11 %

14 %

12 %

14 %

28 %

14 %

50 %

58 %

100 %



Indoor air quality

IV III II I

PMV Adaptive

16,016,517,017,518,018,519,019,520,020,521,021,522,022,523,023,524,024,525,025,526,026,527,027,528,028,529,029,530,030,531,0

-22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

indo

or te

mpe

ratu

re, °

C

outdoor temperature running mean, °C

Category I, II and III limits and indoor temperature from column C

1 3


Use of the adaptive approach

ThermCo project did not established any conclusive evidence on the use of adaptive approach in buildings with limited cooling capacity/control

It was concluded that the same expectancy can be expected as in mechanically cooled buildings, i.e. PMV-model shall be used

It was also proposed that the PMV model has to be used for sizing of the room conditioning units, but the system capacity may be undersized according to adaptive model, but there was no scientific evidence available supporting this (also no evidence against that exists)

It can be expected that some (minor) adaptation to outdoor temperature can be seen in every building with room controllers (non-centrally controlled, non-overcooled buildings), but no evidence exists

As no evidence exists one shall use PMV-model.


Energy saving doesn’t always mean energy performance increment

Relative performance as a function of temperature REHVA Guidebook 6 (2006)


Recommendations for revision of EN 15251

The recommendation is to write a guideline in the standard saying that:

- some cooling is better than no cooling and if a system with limited cooling capacity is installed the designer must shown how often the room temperatures is expected to exceed the temperature limits specified for mechanical cooled buildings in EN15251and also show this for the adaptive approach.

- This will provide the client with data for the expected performance.

It is stressed that the intention of the standard should not be that a building must be in one category the whole year; but rather use the categories to provide a footprint of the performance by showing the % of occupied time in each category. This should also be made clearer in the standard


Limited cooling/ventilation capacity/control

Report % of occupied time in each category to the client …

11 %

18 %

31 %

12 %

34 %

42 %

28 %

16 %

18 %

50 %

32 %

9 %



Indoor air quality

IV III II I


Revision of EN 15251/ the season change

The season change from cooling to heating season should be clearly addressed

15C outdoor temperature should be used for season change independently of direction from heating to cooling or cooling to heating

In many offices there may be significant long periods with cooling demand in winter, but the clothing level chosen by people may be winter levels as the outside temperature is low. So the criteria is an upper limit for the heating room temperature of 23-25 C depending of the category chosen

It is also addressed that the present formulation of adaptive model may result in some climatic zones lower room temperatures required for the buildings without mechanical cooling. (As the criteria for buildings without mechanical cooling vary with outside temperatures in summer, but criteria for mechanical cooled buildings stay the same for the summer.


Lower temperatures required for free-running

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Op

era

tiv

e t

em

pe

ratu

re,

°C


The problem disappears when the season change limit is corrected to 15C


Low energy cooling REHVA-guidebook

As there are many low energy cooling solutions (including passive and mechanical cooling) not compromising air quality and thermal comfort if properly implemented it was decided to prepare REHVA-guidebook

Guidebook will include

- Definitions of seasonal performance

- Guidance on thermal comfort criteria

- Description and examples of technical solutions


Seasonal performance system boundaries

Example of Aachen (Germany) office building: Whereas the heat pump itself has a COP of 4.8 the system efficiency over the whole heating period, expressed here as a "seasonal performance factor (SPF)", varies between 12 and 2.6 depending on the system boundaries (and the corresponding auxiliary energy for pumps) – same applies for the cooling


Energy efficiency of cooling

Seasonal COSP (called also SEER, SCOP or SPF) should be estimated by energy simulation calculation. Seasonal COSP is a weighted average COSP for a year.

Manufactures give performance data at full load according to EN 14511-2:2007 and at part load according to prEN 14825:2008 (ESEER, the seasonal value SEER for Europe)

EER values include the compressor unit (effective power input definition of EN 14511-1:2007). The values do not include the condenser fans (despite of integral condenser in the liquid chilling package) and the distribution system, so the application seasonal ESEER value has to be recalculated for the distribution system used in the real building.

systemon distributi andplant auxiliary s,compressor allby usedenergy electrical Annual

system coolingby achievedenergy cooling Annual Seasonal COSP

An example of the manufactures performance data format and example EER-values (with Italic) for 600 kW air cooled liquid chilling package. Load Outdoor air temperature Energy efficiency ratio Operation time% °C kW/kW %100 35 EER1 = 2.73 3

75 30 EER2 = 3.67 33

50 25 EER3 = 4.21 41

25 20 EER4 = 4.52 23

ESEER = EER1 x 3% + EER2 x 33% + EER3 x 41% + EER4 x 23% = 4.09

Note: Constant leaving water temperature = 7°C


Calculated example

Simulation example for the building with conventional cooling (COP=2.7):

Delivered cooling energy by plant is 42.8 kWh/(m2 a) consisting of:- 29.7 kWh/(m2 a) to chilled beams (with central water distribution system)

- and 13.1 kWh/(m2 a) to cooling coils of air handling units.

Electrical energy use of cooling system is 9.5 kWh/(m2 a), consisting of:- 8.6 kWh/(m2 a) electricity use of compressor unit

- 0.6 kWh/(m2 a) electricity use of condenser fans

- 0.3 electricity use of circulation pumps.

the application seasonal SEER is 42.8/9.5 = 4.5

Compressor cooling COP values for conventional and high temperature cooling systems at two condensing temperatures. Conventional condenser

(air-cooled, Tcond =40°C) Borehole condenser (ground water-cooled, Tcond =20°C)

Conventional cooling, 7°C (Tevap=2°C)

2.7 6.3

High temperature cooling, 17°C (Tevap=12°C)

4.0 15


Read also ThermCo article on high temperature room conditioning solutions: REHVA Journal, August 2009 1. Chilled beams

(water radiators for heating)

3. Floor cooling and heating (pipes in the slab)

2. Ceiling panels

Additional features (not included in basic cases): demand controlled ventilation night ventilation shorter chiller operation time / operative temperature control

Documents

REHVA Supporters Seminar, Brussels,10.12 2009, Jarek Kurnitski Establishing an annex for EPBD-related CEN-standards for buildings with high energy efficiency