Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rehabilitative Management of the Chronic
Pain Patient: Goals, Strategies, and
ExpectationsTroy Hooper, PT, PhD, ATC
Assistant Professor
ScD Program in PT
Disclosures
‣None
Moseley GL. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Manual Therapy. 2003;8(3):130-140.
Parallel Neural Networks or Matrices
3
Cognitive
Affective
Motivational
Emotional
Context Factors
Persistent pain is not necessarily related only to injury, but also due
to activation of the matrix.
Afferent
Pathways
Neuromatrix Approach
Treating Chronic Pain
‣Management Benchmarks
• Information for mind and body
• Desensitization
• General activation
• Turn the corner on disability
Information for the Mind
Neuromatrix Approach
“subchronic low back pain can be
managed successfully … and long
term disability may be reduced …
with information for patients about
the nature of the problem, provided in
a manner designed to reduce fear
and give them reason to resume light
activity.”Indahl A, Haldorsen EH, Holm S, Reikerås O, Ursin H. Five-year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light
mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine. 1998;23(23):2625-30.
Information for the Mind
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Therapeutic focus:
• Reduce the threats by improving
understanding
• Key components
- Education
- Systematic approach to identification and
progression of motoric and functional
baselinesMoseley GL. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Man Ther. 2003;8(3):130-40.
Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: The past, present, and future. J Pain. 2015;16(9):807-813.
Information for the Mind
Neuromatrix Approach
7
Help establish: Willingness to socialize:
• Family Support-Help
with duties
• Sleeping
• Exercise
• Nutrition
• Smoking
• Are they isolating
themselves?
• Possibly not moving
much
• Encourage walking
with family members
• Social activities
Social Support
Information for the Mind
Neuromatrix Approach
Communication
‣ Self Consciousness:
• Ensure early success in treatment (some form)
• Do not pick on them
Information for the Body
Neuromatrix Approach
Motor control is affected by:
‣ Fear of pain
‣ Anticipation of pain
‣ Catastrophizing
‣ Past history
‣ Thoughts and emotions
Puentedura EJ, Louw A. A neuroscience approach to managing athletes with low back pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2012;13(3):123-133.
Information for the Body
Neuromatrix Approach
Locomotor Consequences:
‣ Muscles
• Global
• Local
• Pelvic floor
‣ Changes due to pain
• Histological
• Strength
• Motor recruitment (magnitude and timing)
Information for the Body
Neuromatrix Approach
Higher Order
Complex Combinations 1 + 7 2 + 7 3 + 7
4 + 1, 4 + 3, 4 + 1 + 7, 4 + 3 + 7
5 + 1, 5 + 3, 5 + 1 + 7, 5 + 3 + 7
6 + 1, 6 + 3, 6 + 1 + 7, 6 + 3 + 7
See other exercise group combinations
Standing ADIM in standingDiagonal Pull-
Downs A-B in Standing Reciprocal ReachResisted Hip
Extension in stand
1. Latissimus Pull-Downs
2. Low-Rows PFA in standing
1/2 KneelingADIM in 1/2
kneelingDiagonal Pull-
Downs A-B in 1/2 KneelingReciprocal Shoulder
Elevation Glut Sets in 1/2
kneeling
1. Unilateral Pull-Downs
2. Unilateral Low-Rows PFA in 1/2 kneeling
SittingADIM in Sitting on
SwissBall
1. X-Leg resisted diag's
2. X-Leg Diag Pull-Downs A-B in Sitting
Reciprocal Shoulder Elevation
Tipped Rise from SwissBall
1. Latissimus Pull-Downs
2. Low-RowsPFA in Sitting on
Swiss Ball
All-4's ADIM in All-4'sReciprocal Drawing-
in A-B In All-4's Hip Ext-HoldKnee Ext --> Hip
Ext + LEERResisted Sh.
Extension PFA in All-4's
Lower Order Recumbent1. ADIM in Supine 2. ADIM in Prone
1. Bridging 2. Side Bridging (SB)
3. Abdominal Crunch A-B in Supine
1. Sup Assisted Activation
2. Prone Hip Ext-Hold Bridge & March1. Sup ISOM Sh Ext 2. Side Bridge
1. PFA in supine 2. PFA in prone
LocomotorComponent
Transverse Abdominus
Internal Obliques
Abdominal Co-Contraction Multifidus
Gluteus Maximus Latissimus Dorsi Pelvic Floor
Exercise Group Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
SenMoCORTM
Information for the Body
Neuromatrix Approach
Functional Sensory Consequences:
‣ Reflex responses
‣ Proprioception
‣ Static and dynamic balance
‣ Postural control
Information for the Body: Testing
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Single-leg balance
• Hard vs foam surface
‣ Y-Balance Test
Hooper TL, James CR, Brismée JM et al. Dynamic balance as measured by the y-balance test is reduced in individuals with low back pain: A cross-sectional comparative study. Phys Ther Sport. 2016;2229-34.
Information for the Body: Training
Neuromatrix Approach
Desensitize
Neuromatrix Approach
Louw A, Zimney K, O’Hotto C, Hilton S. The clinical application of teaching people about pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(5):385-395.
Desensitize
Neuromatrix Approach
Use Visualization
‣ Imagine using the arm/leg how it used
to be
‣ See yourself in the future with normal
function: imagine those activities
Desensitize
Neuromatrix Approach
Focus on Function Rather Than Pain
‣ De-emphasize VAS
‣ Emphasize functional scores
General Activation
Neuromatrix Approach
Improving Fitness and Function
‣ Activity-oriented exercise > strengthening
and stretching exercises
• Allows the patient to link the exercise to their
day-to-day activities
‣ Understand that the exercise is not about a
cure, but about how to be more active
despite the pain. Any change to the pain, is a
bonus!
General Activation
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Introduce exercise slowly, and start with the
least feared movements.
‣ “What would you do if your pain was gone?”
‣ Break the goal down into small parts.
‣ Make a plan – write it down.
‣ Activity log.
General Activation
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Start with low baselines. Build up tolerance
gradually and systematically.
• Easily manageable (time or repetitions)
• Done comfortably
• Does not cause flare-up (can have up to 2
hours of increased pain after)
‣ Take regular rests between activities.
‣ Do small amounts often rather than doing
everything at once.
General Activation
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Do not rush to increase activity/exercise
levels. Just maintaining the program can be
beneficial.
‣ Don’t overdo it on good days (pacing).
‣ “every day you do more than you did
yesterday, but not much more”
Turning the Corner on Disability
Neuromatrix Approach
Turning the Corner on Disability
Neuromatrix Approach
Additional Treatment Domains
‣ Anxiety and Depression
‣ Emotional Issues
‣ Socioeconomic Issues
‣ Fear Avoidance
‣ Social Support
‣ Occupational Barriers
Turning the Corner on Disability
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Increased pain thresholds during
physical tasks (Moseley, 2004; Van Oosterwick
et al, 2011)
‣ Reduced unhelpful pain-related beliefs
and attitudes, improved exercise
outcomes (Moseley, 2004; Nijs et al, 2011;
Meeus 2010)
‣ Decreased perceived disability (Moseley,
2002; Van Oosterwick et al, 2011; Pires et al, 2015)
Turning the Corner on Disability
Neuromatrix Approach
‣ Reduced healthcare visits: 3.6 vs. 13.5
in control group at 1 year (Moseley, 2002)
‣ Significantly reduced sick-leave days
and care-seeking (Vibe Fersum et al, 2013)
‣ Reduced healthcare costs when
implemented pre-operatively: 45% less
than control group at 1 year (Louw et al,
2014)