57
Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related Cognitive Dysfunction: The Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute STAR Program Nancy Hutchison, MD July 30, 2016 STAR Connection Conference

Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related Cognitive Dysfunction: The Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute STAR ProgramNancy Hutchison, MD

July 30, 2016STAR Connection Conference

Page 2: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

1

• Describe the MD PMR evaluation for Cancer-Related Cognitive Dysfunction (CRCD)

• Explain the Multifactor Model of cognitive impairment and why it is important for treatment of CRCD

• Describe an Occupational Therapy based CRCD treatment program

• Describe the challenges in reimbursement for therapy services for CRCD

1

Course Objectives

Page 3: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

2

• Focused history– Focal neurologic deficit or high risk for metastatic

disease: imaging– Cancer treatment history– Brain injury/learning history– Nature of impairments

• Attention/multitasking• Unable to complete tasks• Word finding difficulty• Memory• Needing prompts/reminders• Thinking processes slow• Job or functional performance noticeably suffering

2

NCCN Survivorship Guidelines Cognition

Page 4: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

3

• Assessment of Contributing Factors– Medications– Emotional distress

• Depression• Anxiety• Financial• Social

– Symptom burden• Pain• Fatigue• Insomnia

– Comorbidities– Use of alcohol and other substances that alter cognition

3

NCCN Guidelines Cognition

Page 5: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

4

• Memory

• Attention

• Speed of processing

• Word finding

• Executive functioning

4

Main Symptoms of CRCD

Page 6: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

5

• Proinflammatory cytokines produced by the tumor

• Neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy agents– Directly or by inducing cascade of neurotoxic pro-

inflammatory cytokines

• Fatigue• Depression• Stress• Pain• All of the above in some combination

5

Possible mechanisms for CRCD

Page 7: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

6

• Direct training attempting to remediate damaged neurocircuitry

• Psycho-educational approaches to improve self management

• Sometimes in combination with – Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

– Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction

– Exercise interventions

6

Strategies for Treatment

Page 8: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

7

• High-repetition of computer-based exercises over weeks or months.

• Studies on breast cancer patients with computer-based training for – memory (Von Ah et al., 2012)– speed of processing (Von Ah., 2012)– executive functions (Kesler et al., 2013)– multiple cognitive domains (Damholdt et al., 2016)

• Statistically significant improvements on neurocognitive tests and self-reported cognitive function as compared to controls

• Carry over to daily life? Adherence to exercises long term?

7

Direct Cognitive Retraining

Page 9: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

8

• Help cancer survivors improve functioning by expanding their repertoire of cognitive strategies via a limited number of group or individual sessions.

• Studies on cancer survivors with PsychoEducational Interventions:– Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al.,

2012) • improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but not in self-

reported cognitive complaints, fatigue, depression, or anxiety – Group-based cognitive rehabilitation

• improvements in self-reported cognitive function and neurocognitive measures of attention (Cherrier et al., 2013) or verbal memory (Ercoli et al., 2015).

• Ercoli and colleagues (2015) did not measure treatment effects on fatigue, mood, or stress

• Cherrier and colleagues (2013) found no treatment effect on these domains on fatigue, mood, stress

• Group vs Individual? Motivation for tasks chosen?

8

Psychoeducational Approaches to CRCD

Page 10: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

9

• Developed for individuals with a diagnosis of cancer

• Self Report• 4 areas addressed:

1. Perceived Cognitive Impairments2. Reports of Impairment by others3. Perceived Cognitive Abilities4. Quality of Life

The higher the score the betterCurrently no standardized way to interpret data

9

FACT-COG

Page 11: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

10

Four scales:

• Perceived cognitive impairments: 20 items

• Perceived cognitive abilities: 9 items

• Comments from Others: 4 items

• Impact on quality of life: 4 items

10

FACT-COG Version 3

Page 12: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

11

• The multi-factor model views cognitive changes after cancer treatment as not fixed but varying from moment-to-moment.

• It reflects inefficient cognitive abilities plus adverse effects on functioning from personal factors and situational factors.

• As people see little successes toward their own goals, they are motivated to continue to change

• Reinforces principles of successful behavior change– “The Why” transforms a chore ("extrinsic motivation")

into a gift ("intrinsic motivation") that individuals want to keep giving themselves.” Michelle Segar, PhD

11

Multifactor Model

Page 13: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

12

• One group, pre-post intervention

• 28 women at least 3-18 months post chemo and rad (completion treatment) for breast cancer

• Measurements– Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

(function in everyday life)

– FACT Cog (self report measure of cognitive function)

– Other measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, neuropsychologic tests, self efficacy

– Satisfaction Survey

12

CKRI Focus Forward Study: Method

Page 14: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

13

• Statistically significant pre-post improvements in occupational performance and self-efficacy– largest effect sizes for tasks participants identified as important to them.

• Statistically significant improvements in interfering factors (anxiety, stress, depression, fatigue). – Of the 8 participants whose Beck Depression Inventory-II score was in the

moderate/severe range at pretest (>19), 5 were in the normal/mild range at posttest.

– Composite Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) score was not significant but the amount of change in the FSI interference score was significant.

• Participants improved in all dimensions FACT-Cog • Statistically significant improvements pre-post in 3 neurocognitive

measures – Trails A– Word fluency– Total recall domain of the Hopkin Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).

• Participants were very satisfied with Focus Forward– mean overall satisfaction score of 9.4 out of 10.

13

Focus Forward study: Submitted for publication

Page 15: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

Occupational Therapy based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program

Joette Zola, OTR/L, STAR/T

Page 16: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

15

• Ensures that Star Cognitive Cancer Program is provided in a consistent manner across sites

• Evidenced-Based or guided protocol– Ongoing literature review

• Recommendations for treatment frequency and duration

• Billing Guidelines

• Reviewed and updated/ adapted annually to bi-annually if indicated

15

Best Practice Guidelines

Page 17: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

16

• Fact Cog is the program outcome measure– Completed at initial assessment– Again towards the end of treatment when majority of

progress has been achieved

• Structured interview using the COPM and the philosophy of MI– What their life was like prior to diagnosis– How they experienced their brains prior to diagnosis– Top 5 challenges in life roles or symptoms they would like to

work on at this point in their acute care– Factors; both personal and situational that are affecting

thinking and life role performance

16

Assessment

Page 18: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

1717

I just couldn’t figure out how to organize my

daughter’s scrapbook

I drove home and wondered how many

stop signs I went through

Page 19: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

18

• Multi Factor Model

• Awareness

• Human Information Processing Theory

18

3 Core Concepts

Page 20: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

19

When individuals have cancer and/ cancer treatment,

a person’s disability is determined by:

– Brain factors

– The effects of problematic factors both personal and situational

• Montgomery, 1995

• An individuals cognitive function varies from moment to moment & from situation to situation.

19

Multi-factor Model of Function

Page 21: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

20

PERSONAL FACTORS:– Fatigue

– Arousal/Tension

– Physical symptoms • (i.e. headaches, nausea)

– Negative thoughts

SITUATIONAL FACTORS:– External environmental

distracters

– Multi-task demands

– Information processing demands

• Montgomery 1995

20

Multi Factor Model of Function

Client Worksheet

My Brain Factors:StrengthsInefficiencies

My Personal Factors

My Situational Factors

Page 22: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

21

Distractions from physical

symptoms (fatigue & pain)

Distractions from emotional

symptoms (stress, fear, depression)

Situational demands of everyday life

Pathophysiology

Thinking abilities

Page 23: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

22

Crosson’s Awareness Hierarchy(Crosson, et.al. 1989)

There are 3 levels:

• Intellectual: Aware there is a change but feel it is not in your control (This cancer has ruined my memory)

• Emergent: Recognizing problems when they occur

(“There I go again, I am too tired and nauseous to remember anything.”)

• Anticipatory: Anticipates a potential problem and has a

strategy they can use to avoid problems

(“I know that on weeks I have chemo I am more fatigued and apt to forget

things so I only schedule important meetings on non-chemo weeks.”)

Page 24: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

23

Awareness is a Process

• Some people are limited in their ability to develop awareness at an organic level

– (consider the type of cancer, tumor location, prognosis and impairment level)

– Sometimes the client is the family

• Some people are limited in their ability to develop awareness at a psychological level

• It is very important to be aware of what your client’s barriers are and normalize resistance to change.

• Realize the hierarchy is not rigid, we go back and forth depending on the focus and our personal/ situational factors

Page 25: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

24

CROSSON’S AWARENESS

ANTICIPATORY

EMERGENT

INTELLECTUAL

ACCEPTANCE

RESISTANCE

DENIAL/ UNAWARE

Page 26: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

25

Anticipatory Awareness helps clients learn how to manage themselves via behavior changes and strategies

Area of concern Times this occurs Strategy that could

help

Forgetting to take

medications

Good in the am but

forget at noon

Post a sign in kitchen

Set a cell phone

alarm

Page 27: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

26

Human Information Processing 1001

26

Pain

To do FatigueShort-term sensory

registers

Working memory Long term memory

Page 28: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

27

Implications for cancer**ADD REFERENCE FOR ENCODING ARTICLE

27

Pain

To do FatigueShort-term sensory

registers

Working memory Long term memory

Page 29: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

28

Main Modules in Program

• Energy Management (modified since the study)

• Time Management

• Information Management

• Attention

• Communication (added since the study)

28

Page 30: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

29

Energy Management

• Budget

• Taking breaks

• Activity template

29

Page 31: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

30

Know their current minimum balance

Recognize that they will get hit with penalties if they go below that balance

Practice putting “deposits” in through out the day

Increase their budget through exercise

If they decide to “blow the budget”; Be ready to pay the fees

30

Energy Budget

Checking Account

Page 32: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

31

Taking Breaks Intentionally

• Reflect on 3 types of Fatigue:– Physical– Cognitive– Emotional

• Generate a list of 10 possible breaks

• Identify times of day that they need to pause and consider their status

• Use stop notes and / timers

31

Page 33: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

32

Activity Template

Can be used to:

1. Re-establish lost routines

2. Re-evaluate routines to ensure they are realistic and sustainable

3. Plan a routine that paces tasks throughout the day/ week

Task Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat

Self-care

Home

Others

Social

Medical

Work

32

Page 34: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

33

Time Management

• Task Categorization:– To Do’s– Projects – Problems

• Prioritization– Including self care

• Divide and Conquer– Help them identify roles or tasks that someone else

can manage for a while.

• Structured Problem-solving

33

Page 35: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

34

Time Management

Key is understanding what the task requires:

Determine the type of task

TO DO Single item that needs to be completed

Project Multiple tasks that need to be completed to

reach an end goal

Problem Need to determine a solution and then

complete the TO Do or Project.

Page 36: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

35

To Do’s = Prioritization

Franklin Covey

A: Urgent & Important

Just Do It , Delegate to

Someone you Trust

B: Not Urgent but Important

Plan for it

C: Urgent but Not Important

Do it, Delegate it, Delete it

D: Not Urgent or Important

Do it, Delegate it, Delete it,

\Choose to Ignore it until it

becomes urgent

Page 37: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

36

Projects = Divide and Conquer

Break the Project up into categories of tasks

Add single tasks below each heading

Assign due dates as needed

Identify the order the tasks need to be completed in

Project Name:

Order: Category: Deadline:

Category:

Page 38: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

37

Problems = Structured Solving

1. Notice the Problem

2. Identify main goal

3. List alternate solutions

4. Write down the pro’s/ con’s of each

5. Make your decision

6. Complete the To Do

or

Divide & Conquer

7. Reflect back on your

choices/ plan

Page 39: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

38

Information Management

• Review and assess effectiveness of current system/ systems

• Planning routines– Monthly– Weekly – Daily updates: morning or evening before

• Other options **will add more in this area d/t recent research

– Memory strategies – Structured lists– Momentary Intentions– Etc.

38

Choose a memory up that works for them

Page 40: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

39

Attention Levels Defined:

Focused attention - preparedness of an individual to respond

Sustained attention - the duration of time over which a given level of performance may be maintained

Selective attention - the ability to focus on relevant stimuli in the presence of distracting stimuli

Alternating attention – the ability to shift focus from one task to another and back again

Divided attention: the ability to either process more than one kind of stimuli or simultaneously carry out more than 1 activity at a time

Page 41: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

40

Intentional Task Choosing:

Identify the Consequence level of the task?

Low: You can afford mistakes or errors

High: can not afford mistakes or errors

Identify their capabilities?

Hardphysically, cognitively,

emotionally

Easyphysically, cognitively and/

emotionally

Page 42: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

41

ATTENTIONLimit the demands on your attention

HIGH CONSEQUENCE AND/ OR HARD FOR YOU:

LOW CONSEQUENCE

AND/ EASY:

Limit distracters

Limit interruptions

Best time of day

Do one thing at a time

Use strategies

Use Stop Notes

Take breaks

Distracters are allowed

Perform tasks when you are not at your best

Ok to multi-task or handle interruptions

Page 43: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

42

Pausing

Thumb:

STOP

1ST finger:

What am I

doing?

2nd finger:

Is this what I

should be

doing?

3rd finger:

Do I have

what I need?

4th

finger:

GO

Page 44: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

43

• Take a moment to align their brain and their body

• Think calmly regarding what they are doing at the present time

• If we ask our brains a question it will try to answer it

• We get in trouble when we are too distracted, stressed or tired to ask

43

Pause to focus attention

simply taking a moment to align your brain and

Page 45: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

44

• Understand the inefficiency:– Word retrieval

– Attention

– Memory

• Correlation to the personal and situational factors

• Strategies to match the concern

44

Communication

Page 46: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

45

Highlight the importance of exercise for thinking, fatigue and overall health.

Page 47: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

46

•6 treatments + an assessment

•3 months

•Start weekly and decrease to every other with an optional 1 month follow up

•This is suggested not mandated

• Inform referring provider if falling significantly outside of best practice

Frequency and Duration

46

Page 48: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

47

•PM&R Doctors

•Care Coordinators

•Social Workers

•Psychologists/ Healing Coaches

•Nutritionists

•Other therapists from different impairment groups

•Only own what is ours

Work with a Team to meet Client needs

47

Page 49: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

Therapy Operations and Reimbursement Challenges

Lori Froehling, PT, STAR/T

Page 50: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

49

• CRCD as an impairment is well documented in the literature

• Assessment of CRCD and Occupational Therapytreatments have been identified

• Many patient tools and activities to address impairments

• Team Approach

49

Quick Review

Page 51: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

50

• Billing for Evaluation– Initial Evaluation Occupational Therapy 97002

• Billing for Treatment– Development of Cognitive Skills 97532

– Self care/Home Management Training 97535

– Community/Work Reintegration Training 97537

*** Bill according to intent of the outcome of treatment

50

Beyond Providing Care - Billing

Page 52: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

51

• Comprehensive Evaluation– Objective self-report and performance based assessments– Clearly identify functional (ADL/IADL) impairments and

expectation of improvement– Interventions – document to support the skilled and medically

necessary skills of the therapist– Objective and measurable goals– Planned interventions appropriate for identified impairment

• Subsequent visits– Non-repetitive, progressive– Skilled and medically necessary– Re-assessment of progress toward goals (objective measures)

51

Beyond Providing Care -Documentation

Page 53: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

52

Understanding Coverage Limitations

• Accurately identify the patient insurance coverage before the patient attends the first visit

• Workflow to communicate information to therapist

• Coding - Coverage determination may be dependent on accurate coding of primary and secondary diagnosis

• Billing – Timely notification of denials

• Knowledgeable in Medicare / Medicaid, and private insurance coverage

• Partner with Payer Relations department –access to plan representatives

• Assist with staff education – billing, documentation, waivers, ABN

• Understand the diagnosis and interventions being performed

• Staff education

• Advocate for change in payer coverage –requires outcome data and measure of value

Rehab Manager

Quality & Regulatory

Staff

Registration Staff

Coding & Billing Staff

52

Therapist

Page 54: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

53

• Payer Plan and Policy specific – keep track

• Educate patients on services available, your understanding of coverage, and their responsibility to contact their insurance company to confirm (provide dx and CPT codes)

• Follow ABN and Waiver guidelines of your organization

• Utilize facility discounts or subsidy programs

• Establish self-pay guidelines for non-covered or excluded services

53

Non-Covered Service

Page 55: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

54

• As clinicians read the literature and use it to develop best practice guidelines

• Challenge our current models of care delivery (1:1 visit) and evaluate options: – group sessions as part of survivorship– Reinforce cognitive strategies as part of care coordination– Therapist phone visit (billable – not yet)

• Advocate for cognitive rehabilitation as part of bundled payment for cancer care

• Collect outcome measures – initial and discharge, measure impact of services provided and overall value (return to work, caregiver burden, etc.) – use to influence payer policy and payment

• We have so much to offer !

54

Future Considerations

Page 57: Rehabilitation Evaluation of Cancer Related …...–Memory and Attention Adaptation Training (MAAT; Ferguson et al., 2012) •improvements in quality of life and verbal memory, but

56

• Nancy Hutchison, MD, STAR/T– Medical Director for Cancer Rehabilitation,

Survivorship and Lymphedema– [email protected]

• Joette Zola, OTR/L, STAR/T– Lead for Cancer Rehabilitation Cognitive Impairment

team– [email protected]

• Lori Froehling, PT, STAR/T– Director of Therapy Operations– [email protected]

56

Presenters