59
1 Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11). Example: Mortgage denial and race The Boston Fed HMDA data set. The Linear Probability Model. The Linear Probability Model. Example : Linear Prob Model. Linear probability model: HMDA data. Linear probability model: HMDA data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

1

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

Page 2: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

2

Example: Mortgage denial and raceThe Boston Fed HMDA data set

Page 3: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

3

The Linear Probability Model

Page 4: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

4

The Linear Probability Model

Page 5: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

5

Example: Linear Prob Model

Page 6: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

6

Linear probability model: HMDA data

Page 7: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

7

Linear probability model: HMDA data

Page 8: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

8

Linear probability model: ApplicationCattaneo, Galiani, Gertler, Martinez, and Titiunik (2009). “Housing, Health, and Happiness.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1(1): 75 - 105

• What was the impact of Piso Firme, a large-scale Mexican program to help families replace dirt floors with cement floors?

• A pledge by governor Enrique Martinez y Martinez led to State of Coahuila offering free 50m2 of cement flooring ($150 value), starting in 2000, for homeowners with dirt floors

Page 9: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

9

Cattaneo et al. (AEJ:Economic Policy 2009) “Housing, Health, & Happiness” X1 = “Program dummy” = 1 if offered Piso Firme.

Page 10: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

10

Cattaneo et al. (AEJ:Economic Policy 2009) “Housing, Health, & Happiness”

Interpretations?

X1 = “Program dummy” = 1 if offered Piso Firme

Page 11: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

11

Probit and Logit Regression

Page 12: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

12

Probit Regression

Page 13: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

13

STATA Example: HMDA data

Page 14: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

14

STATA Example: HMDA data, ctd.

Page 15: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

15

Probit regression with multiple regressors

Page 16: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

16

STATA Example: HMDA data

Page 17: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

17

STATA Example: HMDA data

Page 18: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

18

STATA Example: HMDA data

Page 19: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

19

Probit Regression Marginal Effects

Page 20: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

20

Probit Regression Marginal Effects. sum pratio; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max-------------+-------------------------------------------------------- pratio | 1140 1.027249 .286608 .497207 2.324675. scalar meanpratio = r(mean);. sum disp_pepsi; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max-------------+-------------------------------------------------------- disp_pepsi | 1140 .3640351 .4813697 0 1. scalar meandisp_pepsi = r(mean);. sum disp_coke; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max-------------+-------------------------------------------------------- disp_coke | 1140 .3789474 .4853379 0 1. scalar meandisp_coke = r(mean);

. probit coke pratio disp_coke disp_pepsi;

Iteration 0: log likelihood = -783.86028 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -711.02196 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -710.94858 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -710.94858

Probit regression Number of obs = 1140 LR chi2(3) = 145.82 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000Log likelihood = -710.94858 Pseudo R2 = 0.0930

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ coke | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- pratio | -1.145963 .1808833 -6.34 0.000 -1.500487 -.791438 disp_coke | .217187 .0966084 2.25 0.025 .027838 .4065359 disp_pepsi | -.447297 .1014033 -4.41 0.000 -.6460439 -.2485502 _cons | 1.10806 .1899592 5.83 0.000 .7357465 1.480373------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 21: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

21

Probit Regression Marginal Effects

Page 22: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

22

Logit Regression

Page 23: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

23

STATA Example: HMDA data

Page 24: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

24

Predicted probabilities from estimated probit and logit models usually are (as usual) very close in this application.

Page 25: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

25

Logit Regression Marginal Effects

Page 26: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

26

Comparison of Marginal Effects

LPM Probit Logit

Marginal Effect at Means for Price Ratio

-.4008(.0613)

-.4520(.0712) via nlcom

-.4905(.0773) via nlcom

Average Marginal Effect of Price Ratio

-.4008(.0613)

-.4096(beyond eco205)

-.4332(beyond eco205)

Marginal Effect at Means for Coke display dummy

.0771(.0343)

.0856(.0381) via nlcom

.0864(.0390) via nlcom

Average Marginal Effect For Coke display dummy

.0771(.0343)

.0776(beyond eco205)

.0763(beyond eco205)

. probit coke pratio disp_coke disp_pepsi /* should request robust std errors, I didn’t when making original slide */

. margins , dydx(*) /* Average marginal effect */

. margins , dydx(*) atmeans /* Marginal effect at means of X’s */

Page 27: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

27

Probit model: ApplicationArcidiacono and Vigdor (2010). “Does the River Spill Over? Estimating the Economic Returns to Attending a Racially Diverse College.” Economic Inquiry 48(3): 537 – 557.

• Does “diversity capital” matter and does minority representation increase it?

• Does diversity improve post-graduate outcomes of non-minority students?

• College & Beyond survey, starting college in 1976

Page 28: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

28

Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

Page 29: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

29

Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

Page 30: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

30

Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

Page 31: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

31

Logit model: ApplicationBodvarsson & Walker (2004). “Do Parental Cash Transfers Weaken Performance in College?” Economics of Education Review 23: 483 – 495.

• When parents pay for tuition & books does this undermine the incentive to do well?

• Univ of Nebraska @ Lincoln & Washburn Univ in Topeka, KS, 2001-02 academic year

Page 32: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

32

Bodvarsson & Walker (EconEduR,2004)

Page 33: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

33

Bodvarsson & Walker (EconEduR,2004)

Page 34: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

34

Estimation and Inference in Probit (and Logit) Models

Page 35: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

35

Probit estimation by maximum likelihood

Page 36: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

36

Special case: probit MLE with no X

Page 37: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

37

Page 38: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

38

Page 39: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

39

Page 40: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

40

The MLE in the “no-X” case (Bernoulli distribution), ctd.:

Page 41: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

41

The MLE in the “no-X” case (Bernoulli distribution), ctd:

Page 42: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

42

The probit likelihood with one X

Page 43: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

43

The probit likelihood function:

Page 44: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

44

The Probit MLE, ctd.

Page 45: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

45

The logit likelihood with one X

Page 46: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

46

Measures of fit for logit and probit

Page 47: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

47

Measures of fit for logit and probit

Page 48: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

48

Page 49: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

49

. lsens /* graphs sensitivity & specificity vs. probability cutoff */

Page 50: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

50

Application to the Boston HMDA Data (SW Section 11.4)

Page 51: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

51

The HMDA Data Set

Page 52: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

52

The loan officer’s decision

Page 53: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

53

Regression specifications

Page 54: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

54

Page 55: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

55

Page 56: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

56

Page 57: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

57

Table 11.2, ctd.

Page 58: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

58

Table 11.2, ctd.

Page 59: Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable  (SW Chapter 11)

59

Summary of Empirical Results