Upload
henryprovan
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Registration Marksheet
1/2
Team Name: P-session:P1 P2 P3 P4
Fri Tue Wed Thur
Admitted to Knock-Out Competition: YES / NO
Name Specialisation (>1permitted)
BuildContribution(%)
DemodayAttendance
Team Member 1
Team Member 2
Team Member 3
Team Member 4
Team Member 5
Team Member 6
Team Member 7
Scoring Criteria Score CommentsMeets Requirements
A =
M h i l B ild d B
8/12/2019 Registration Marksheet
2/2
Mechanical B ild andR b B =
Meets Requirements
(A)
(30%)
Mechanical Build and
Robustness (B)
(10%)
Software (C)
(10%)
Electrical (D)
(10%)
Creativity and
Innovation in
design (E) (20%)
Simplicity and
manufacturability (F)
(20%)
Cost (G)
Excellent
(85% -
100%)
You meet all standard
and highly desirabledesign specifications
and provide some
extra capability.
30 Carefully designed andprofessionally
constructed. Overallprofessionalappearance.
Includes innovativedesign features.
10
Code is in
accordance withbest practice.
Innovative
features.
10
Wiring is in
accordance with bestpractice.
Good and clear
cable layout. Some
innovative features.
10
Significant
creativity.Novel features
which expand
the possible role
of the craft.
20 Built from easily sourced and
sustainable materials. Caneasily be mass-produced.
Innovative feature to enhance
sustainability and production.
20
If under budget:
G = 0
If over budget :G = 1%
for every dollar,or start thereof,
spent over $120.E.g. Cost = 123.02G = 4%
28
26 19 19
Very
Good
(75% -
84%)
You meet all standard
and highly desirable
design specifications.
25Carefully designed and
professionallyconstructed. Overall
professionalappearance.
9Code is in
accordance with
best practice.
One innovative
feature.
9 Wiring is in
accordance with best
practice. Good and
clear layout.
9Outstanding
effort,some creativity.
18 Build from easily sourced and
sustainable materials. Can
easily be mass-produced.
18
23 8 8 8 16 16
Good
(65% -
74%)
You meet all standard
and at least one highly
desirable design
specifications
22Well designed andconstructed. Solid
appearance.
7
Code is in
accordance with
best practice.
7
Wiring is in
accordance with best
practice. Layout
could be improved.
7Significant
effort,some creativity.
15 Uses single difficult to source,
non-sustainable or difficult to
mass produce component. Use
of component is well justified.
15
20 13 13
Pass
(50% -
64%)
You meet all standard
design specifications.
19
Design andconstruction has afragile appearance.
6Software is fit
for purpose, but
code writing
standard is
poor.
6 Electrical circuitry
are fit for purpose,
but quality is
lacking
6Some effort,
minimalcreativity.
12 Uses single difficult to source,
non-sustainable or difficult to
mass produce component.
1218
165 5 5 10 10
15
Fail
(25% -
49%)
You meet some of the
design specifications,
or were close to
meeting them.
14
Very fragileconstruction (worried
something will falloff).
4Performance of
code is
questionable
4Poor electrical build
standard (no colour
convention, wire
conections are not of
appropriate
standard).
4
Minimal effort,no creativity.
9Your design may include some
unusual components, or
specialist workmanship, or
construction is unable to be
mass produced
9
12 7 7
103 3 3 5 5
8
Disaster!
(0% -
24%)
You did not meet anyof the design
specifications, and
were not close to
meeting them.
6
Product is incomlete
2 No assessable
material
submitted.
2Wiring is in
disarray.
2
No effort.
4Your design may include some
unusual components, and/or
specialist workmanship, or/and
construction is unable to be
mass produced
44
0 0 0 0 0 0