Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Regionalism in Asia. April 27, 2006 Regional Anatomy I Ken JIMBO. Mid-term Report. Select One from following Five Topics on ‘ Regionalism ’ ‘ Regionalism and Regionalization in Asia (or in certain region) ’ ‘ Open-Regionalism ’ vs. ‘ Bilateral Networks ’ : Comparative Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Regionalism in Asia
April 27, 2006
Regional Anatomy I Ken JIMBO
Mid-term Report
Select One from following Five Topics on ‘Regionalism’ ‘Regionalism and Regionalization in Asia (or in certain region)’ ‘Open-Regionalism’ vs. ‘Bilateral Networks’: Comparative
Analysis Rise of FTA/EPA in World Economy Economic Integration and Regionalism Security Interdependence and Regionalism Socio-Cultural Interaction and Regionalism
Essay Guidance Essay Length: 1200 words (minimum) ⇒ academic format Essay Deadline: 31st March, 2006 Software: Microsoft Word (Attached File) To be Submitted to: [email protected]
Review 1)Three Waves of Regionalism
The First Wave (1950-60s) Between small and medium States Failure in achieving economic development
The Second Wave (1980-90s) ‘Open Regionalism’ ‘Inclusive (nested)
Mechanism’ Stunted Progress (early marginalization)
The Third Wave (2000s-?) Bundle of ‘bilateral networks’ Regional endorsement of ‘ad-hoc mechanisms’
Review 2)Rise of the Third Wave of Regionalism?
Level of Cooperation/Integration
Timelines
Second Wave RegionalismSecond Wave Regionalism
Third Wave Regionalism ?Third Wave Regionalism ?
Review 3)Globalism / Regionalism / Bilateralism and the ‘Recursion’ of the Region
Economic Sphere Security SphereEconomic Sphere Security Sphere
Global FrameworkGlobal Framework GATT / IMF UN / MultinationalGATT / IMF UN / Multinational
Mega-RegionalismMega-Regionalism APEC ARF / OSCE APEC ARF / OSCE
Regionalism Regionalism EU / ASEAN +3 EU / ASEAN EU / ASEAN +3 EU / ASEAN
Coalition Coalition Multilateral FTAs Anti-Terrorism Multilateral FTAs Anti-Terrorism
Bilateralism Bilateralism Bilateral FTAs Bilateral Alliance Bilateral FTAs Bilateral Alliance
Evolution of Regional Integration
Degree of Integration
Free Trade Area: FTA
Tariff Union
Common Market
Economic Union
State Integration
EU
MERCOSUR
NAFTA
AFTA
euro(2002)
F Affairs &Defense
C. Economic Policies
C. Market & Infra
FTA(1958- )
BENELUX Tariff U (’55)
FTA(1992- )
Free Inv. & Services
FTA(1989- )
Free Inv. & Service
C.Economic Policies
C. Tariff
Custom Union(‘86- )
ASEAN-6(’67)
ASEAN-10(’99)
+ China (2010?）
USA+Canada(’92)
+Mexico(’94)
B&A
+ P&U(’95)
EEC-6(’58)
EU-12(’86)
EU-15(’95) EU-27 ?FTAA-34 ? (2005?)
ASEAN=21% 54% 21% 62%
East Asia=40%
------ INTRA-REGIONAL TRADE SHARE (%) OUT OF TOTAL TRADE --------
Source: Kakazu + TY
Regionalism in AsiaGeneral Perspective
Cultural Diversity Language Religion
Historical Backgrounds Pre-Modern Asia (-1840?)
China-centric (tributary) regional order Modern Asia
Great power imperialism (1840-1945) Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere (1920-
1945)
Post-WWII and Asia
Decolonization and Nation Building Sovereignty and Nation Building Economic Re-construction
Cold War Fragmentation China Civil War (1947-49) Korean War (1950-53) Vietnam War (1965-74)
Post-Cold War ExperienceEurope and Asia Compared
In Europe, both the security (NATO) and economic structures (EEC→EC) created the basis for subsequent institutionalization of intra-European ties
Many of America’s Asian allies had far stronger ties across the Pacific than they had among themselves
Cold War Structure and Asia
Alliance Structure Europe: NATO Asia: Bilateral Alliances (San Francisco
System) plus SEATO and ANZUS Threat Perception
Europe: USSR + Eastern Europe Asia: USSR / China / North Korea /
North Vietnam
Warsaw PactWarsaw PactWarsaw PactWarsaw PactNATONATONATONATO
US-led Alliance System (Cold War)US-led Alliance System (Cold War)
Bilateral (Hub-Bilateral (Hub-Spokes) AlliancesSpokes) Alliances
Bilateral (Hub-Bilateral (Hub-Spokes) AlliancesSpokes) Alliances
European TheaterEuropean Theater
(Regional (Regional Approach)Approach)
European TheaterEuropean Theater
(Regional (Regional Approach)Approach)
Asian TheaterAsian Theater
(Bilateral Approach)(Bilateral Approach)
Asian TheaterAsian Theater
(Bilateral Approach)(Bilateral Approach)
Major Conflicts in Asia
Northeast Asia Divided Korea Divided China Sino-USSR Confrontation
Southeast Asia Sino-Vietnam Confrontation Sino-India Confrontation Internal Revolt (communism,
fundamentalism)
Wake of ‘Regionalization’ in Asia ‘De Facto’ Economic Integration
Japan’s Economic Success Foreign aid, trade, investment and technology transfe
‘Flying Geese’ Model (Kojima, 2001) Production Networks Fragmentation Model
Production Cycle Model (R. Vernon, 1966) Benefit of export-oriented ‘late comer’
ASEAN Integration (Political/Economic) Bali Concord / TAC AFTA / ASEAN 10 ASEAN Community (economic/security/socio-cultural)
Flying Geese Model (1)
Source: http://www.grips.ac.jp/module/prsp/FGeese.htm
Flying Geese Model (2)
Source: http://www.grips.ac.jp/module/prsp/FGeese.htm
Product Cycle Model (1)
Product Cycle Model (2)
Product Cycle Model (3)
Asia
４０９．１ ６１５．
９
３１９．１ ２０７．９
４２８．５ ２７６．７
７２．８
１９８．０
３６６．６
３６６．９
２３９．１
２７４．０
（ unit： one hundred million dollars）
Europe
De Facto Economic Integration (1980)
（ unit： one hundred million dollars）
２１９３．１
（８．０times）
Asia
２１４０．９
（５．２times）
１６４５．９
（２．７times）
１４４０．１
（４．５ times）
６４５．１
（３．１times）３１１４．
２
（７．３times）
１３３３．１
（４．８times）７２．８
４８４．６
（４．０） times
１６８４．３
（４．６times）
１９７３．１
（５．４times） １２４９．
２
（５．２times）
De Facto Economic Integration (2000)
22.5%
39.2%
51.9%45.8%
62.5%
13.8%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
日中韓 日中韓港台 ＡＳＥＡＮ＋日中韓港台
ＮＡＦＴＡ ＥＵ ＭＥＲＣＯＳＵＲ
世界の各地域経済共同体と東アジアにおける貿易の域内依存率（２００２年）
※ ASEAN ASEAN日中韓は日本・中国・韓国間の貿易に占める３カ国の割合、日中韓港台は日本・中国・韓国・香港・台湾の貿易に占める５カ国・地域の割合、 ＋日中韓港台は及び日本・中国・韓国・香港・台湾の貿易に占める前述の各国・地域の割合。
2003 Korea Customs Service HP Statistical Yearbook 2003 Edition, National Statistics of Taiwan, the（出所）日本：財務省貿易統計。中国：中国統計年鑑 年、韓国： 、台湾：Republic of China Direction of Trade Statistics。その他はＩＭＦ
ASEAN’s Regionalization Process Chronology
1967: Bangkok Declaration 1971: Zone of Peace, Freedom, and Neutrality (ZOPFAN) 1976: Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) 1976: ASEAN Concord I 1992: ASEAN Declaration on the South China Sea 1995: - Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Z
one 1997: ASEAN Vision 2020 2003: ASEAN Concord II
ASEAN (Bali) Concord II and ASEAN Community ASEAN Economic Community ASEAN Security Community ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community
APEC Process(Rise of Second Wave)
ARF Process(Rise of Second Wave)
Mechanism forConflict Resolution
PreventiveDiplomacy (PD)
ConfidenceBuilding (CBM)
Four Drivers of East Asian Linkages
Governments In European regionalism, the focus on national
governments is a given. Multinational governmental cooperation results in formal regional organizations.
In Asia, although governments have been key players, regional integration were not always driven by formal process.
Corporations Regional trade, investment and cross-national
production networks.
Four Drivers of East Asian Linkages (contd.)
Functional Cooperation Ad-hoc Problem-oriented Bodies
Growing Middle-class Networks Similar Life-style Common Social Security Concerns Middle Class Culture Sharing
“Standard Package” (car, TV, video, PC, cosmetics…etc)
Middle Class in China
Reference
T.J. Pempel, “Introduction: Emerging Webs of Regional Connectedness” T.J. Pempel ed., Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region (Cornell University Press, 2005)
Etel Solingen “East Asian Regional Institutions: Characteristics, Sources, Distinctiveness” T.J. Pempel Ed., op.cit.
Paul Evans, “Between Regionalism and Regionalization: Policy Networks and the Nascent East Asian Institutional Identity” T.J. Pempel ed., op.cit.
Edward Lincoln, East Asian Economic Regionalism (Brookings Institution Press, 2004) Peter J. Katzenstein, World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium (C
ornell University Press, 2005) Ch.2,3,4 Kiyoshi Kojima, The 'flying geese' model of Asian economic development: origin, theor
etical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics 11, 2000, pp.375-401.
Raymond Vernon, "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (May 1966), pp.190-207.
Takashi Shiraishi, “The Third Wave: Southeast Asia and Middle-Class Formation in the Making of Region” Peter Katzenstein and Takashi Shiraishi eds., Beyond Japan: The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism (Cornell University Press, 2006)
