Click here to load reader
Upload
akhatib11
View
1.035
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Rogers, K.B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating Reflection essay on the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396.
Citation preview
REFLECTION ESSAY
LESSONS LEARNED ABOUT EDUCATING THE GIFTED AND TALENTED
By
Ahmad Z. Al Khatib
201080033
Reflection Essay
Current Issues in teaching and learning
Dr. Nagib Balfaqih
United Arab Emirates University
March, 2012
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 2
©2012
Ahmad Z. Al Khatib
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 3
Introduction
This article introduces five lessons learned from research on gifted and talented. “This
synthesis of the research covers instructional management options, instructional delivery
techniques, and curriculum adaptation strategies are an attempt to aid school system
administrators and educators to identify which practices will best fit their respective settings
rather than see the research as a more generalized set of “best practices” that every school should
implement.” (Rogers, 2007, p. 382).
First of all, a definition of Gifted and talented needs to be adopted in order to determine
the target group. The one coined by the US Department of Education (1993) defines the Gifted
and Talented as "Children and youth with outstanding talent who perform or show the potential
for performing at remarkably high levels of accomplishment when compared with others of their
age, experience, or environment." The UAE ministry of education has adopted a similar
definition: " العالي لألداء القابلية على دليال يعطون الذين أولئك هم والمتفوقين الموهوبين األطفال
: مثل مجاالت وهؤالء في محددة، أكاديمية حقول في أو القيادية، والقدرات الفنية اإلبداعية، العقلية،
هذه لمثل الكامل التطوير أجل من وذلك العادية المدرسة تقدمها ال وأنشطة خدمات إلى يحتاجون
أوالقابليات "االستعدادات
Which can be translated as “"Children who perform or show the potential for performing
at remarkably high levels of accomplishment in: cognitive, creative, artistic, leadership, or
specialized academic areas and who require services and activities which are not presented by
regular schools in order to fully develop such capabilities and potentials (UAE MOE, 2012)
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 4
This article provides significant lessons, supported by research and practical application
on five lessons that can be adopted to start and run a program for Gifted and Talented learners at
the school or district level. In order to get the most out of it, I shall review the most important
points and reflect on each of them then finish up with a conclusion and reflection.
Lesson 1: Gifted and Talented learners need daily challenge in their specific area of
interest.
The outcome of lesson 1 is that each recognized gifted child must be given
consistent, progressively difficult curriculum which has been expressed across
grade and building levels and delivered deliberately.
To be able to achieve this, some kind of structured regrouping is required since
leaving this task to the regular classroom teacher to implement would make the
system vulnerable to failure because of the other responsibilities, lack of training,
and lack of motivation to provide differentiation the regular classroom teacher
suffers from.
Bringing gifted learners together through a pull-out or send-out program can be a
feasible option.
For the program to be effective the focus must be on specific extensions of the
school’s regular curriculum or on specific skills and processes integrated within a
curriculum area.
Providing gifted learners with systematic daily or regular challenge has been proven by
research to help advance the gifted learners and motivate them. This would require a separate
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 5
teacher who can be tasked with this apart from the regular classroom teacher who can only assist
in differentiated instruction if provided by adequate training and time.
Lesson 2: Opportunities should be provided on a regular basis for Gifted Learners
to be unique and to work independently in their areas of passion and talent.
Research shows that Gifted Learners prefer independent study, independent
projects and self instructional materials.
Independent study does have an impact on motivation to learn, but it requires
appropriate structuring through the use of a curriculum model, well trained
teachers, and collaboration between the teacher and the library in order to
translate this independent study into academic achievement.
Credit must be given to Gifted Learners for their time in independent learning.
Credit by examination, Curriculum compacting (pre-assessment of mastery and
replacement of mastered activities with differentiated ones), and credit for prior
learning (allowing a student to pass a course or class because of mastery of this
content area through independent learning).
Compacting has strong positive influence on motivation and attitudes of the
Gifted
Keeping the gifted restricted and forcing them to repeat what they have already
mastered can cause all sorts of problems from reticence to cognitive risks to
underachievement, to lowered academic self-esteem and to social and behavioral
maladjustments
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 6
Acknowledgment of the efforts which the gifted have demonstrated through independent
learning can take many forms of which compacting seems to have a strong positive influence on
their motivation and attitude to learn by letting them feel that they are making progress in their
learning. Many problems arise when they are made to sit year after year repeating what they
have previously mastered.
Lesson 3: Provide various forms of Subject-based and Grade-based acceleration to
Gifted Learners as their educational needs require
Subject-based acceleration such as early entrance to school, subject acceleration
(exposing the talented learner to content in the talent area that is 1 or more years
in advance of the learner’s actual grade placement), university-based programs
(residential, Saturday, summer, or commuter courses for middle and high school
gifted learners held on college campuses), individualized distance or online
learning (courses offered via television or Internet that offer advanced content set
at an individualized pace and complexity), cross-graded classes (students cross
grade lines within a school in a content area taught at the same time in all grade
levels, to work at the level of curriculum they are currently in the process of
mastering), advanced placement or international baccalaureate courses (provision
of college-level content in specific content areas to high school learners, with
college credit provided on successful performance on an external national or
international examination, respectively), dual enrollment (allowing a student
coursework at the next higher building level in his or her area of talent), college-
in-the-schools (offering college courses on the high school campus for both high
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 7
school and college credit), and mentorships (connecting the talented learner with a
content expert who structures the learning experiences over a specific period of
time).
The shortening of the actual years spent in the K-12 school system is often
defined as grade-based academic acceleration. This options includes grade
skipping, grade telescoping, non graded or multi-grade classes, credit by
examination, and early admission to college.
Many subject-based and grade-based acceleration options show substantial, positive
academic gains for gifted learners. Emotional impacts are small and positive in general.
Lesson 4: Provide opportunities for Gifted Learners to socialize and to learn with
like-ability peers
The research on the ability grouping and performance grouping of gifted learners
is extensive and substantially positive.
There are different types of ability grouping such as:
o ability grouping (providing all academic learning for gifted learners within
a self-contained setting such as a special school or full-time gifted
program).
o performance grouping for specific instruction (sorting and placing students
in a classroom with others who are performing at the same level of
difficulty in the curriculum).
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 8
o within-class grouping (individual teachers sorting children in their own
classroom according to their current performance in the curriculum).
o cluster grouping (placing the top 5 to 8 students at a grade level in an
otherwise heterogeneous class so that they become a “critical mass” for
whom the teacher can find time to—and does—differentiate).
o pull-out groups (gifted students removed for a consistent set time to a
resource room for extended curriculum differentiation).
Affectively, students in pull-out programs are more positive about school, have
more positive perceptions of giftedness, and are more positive about their
program of study at school than are gifted students not participating in pull-out
programs.
In summary, the evidence is clear that powerful academic effects and small to
moderate affective effects are produced when gifted children are grouped with
like-ability or like-performing peers and exposed to differentiated learning tasks
and expectations. It is also clear that the grouping has positive effects whether
full-time or part-time, although logically the more time this occurs for gifted
children, the more positive the effects on them, socially and emotionally.
It is clear that providing the opportunity for Gifted Learners to socialize with like-ability
peers, produces powerful positive academic and affective results. Depending on the school,
available resources and availability of trained teachers we can select the most appropriate type of
grouping.
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 9
Lesson 5: for specific curriculum areas, instructional delivery must be differentiated
in pace, amount of review and practice, and organization of content presentation.
Pacing:
If Gifted children are to retain what they have learned in mathematics and science,
it must be presented at their actual learning rate, not considerably slower than that
rate.
Some research has suggested that this fast pace is also conducive in other
educational areas and settings, such as foreign language and online distance
learning, but the research is not as extensive nor definitive.
This will require separate instruction, either individually or in a like-performing
group, rather than delivery through the more traditional whole class concept
presentation followed by individual practice and application.
Pacing then is teaching gifted learners at a faster rate. This approach has proven to be
successful in Math and science, but might also be extended to foreign languages and on-line
distance learning. This of course shall require some kind of grouping and separate instruction..
Practice and Review:
Experiential learning in mathematics, using inquiry and problem-based strategies
versus teaching for automaticity through drill and practice, leads to deeper
mathematical understandings among gifted mathematicians.
The general work on distributed versus massed practice also applies to this
differentiation in the amount of practice and review required of talented
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 10
mathematicians and scientists, suggesting that practices or reviews, even though
limited in number to 2 to 3 reviews for the gifted, be distributed across periods for
successful re-encoding of the concept to occur. Correlation is found between
spaced reviews of mathematics and greater retention and understanding.
Providing the Gifted with more in depth, and application of mathematical concepts
correlates with better achievement than exposing them to a wide variety of superficial topics. In
addition spaced reviews of mathematics and science correlates with a greater retention and
understanding.
Whole-to-Part Concept Teaching:
In mathematics, gifted students were able to envision the class or problem
category of even a single problem, identifying the hidden generality of what
might be seemingly disparate elements to other learners. Gifted learners are more
likely to switch to an alternative strategy when faced with a mathematics
challenge they cannot resolve, than to resort to trial and error.
In science, it was found that gifted learners ultimately apprehended the
generalization of the curriculum
Research shows that Gifted Learners are generalists tending to acquire information as a
whole and store it in long-term memory as a whole, whereas average learners tend to acquire and
store information in small, disparate chunks, from which their teachers will need to help them
make connections to ultimately see the whole of a concept.
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 11
Conclusion
Can we establish a practical, able to implement program for the Gifted and Talented in
our school? This research article is evidence that “Yes” it can be done. The five lessons derived
from research and applications provide an evidence for this claim. To do so we need to provide
the GT with steady challenge and daily development of talent, opportunities for regular and
independent work, subject or grade – based accelerations, opportunities to socialize and learn
from their ability-like peers, and differentiated whole-to-part, fast paced instruction that provides
depth and complexity in addition to limited drill and review (Rogers, 2007). To be able to
achieve this some sort of grouping is required and acceleration programs. Schools should offer
two options for each and allow GT learners, teachers, parents and the society to have a say in
that. Schools should move away from the role of identifying GT learners to nurturing and
provision of services that suite their needs. Training is required for novice teachers on how to
identify individual differences and preparation and delivery of differentiated instruction. I’m not
aware of the availability of such programs in our schools in the UAE. This article is an eye
opener and it changed my view and perceptions of gifted learners. From readings on the
characteristics of GT learners I believe that as a child I had some Giftedness in me, but the lack
of such programs in our regular schooling system has led to me being De-Gifted as years passed
by.
GIFTED: REFLECTION ESSAY 12
References
Rogers, K.B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the
research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396.
US Department of Education, (1993). http://www.nsgt.org/articles/index.asp
UAE MOE, (2012). http://www.moe.gov.ae/Arabic/Pages/GiftedandAlvaiqon.aspx