Upload
shanon-foster
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reflection on Data
2013-14…2014-15
Regents Scores June 2012-14
Algebra Geomety English U.S. History Global History Earth Science Living Environment Algebra 2 Chemistry0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
201220132014
June Regents Data
Chemistry 0% 33%
June/August Regents DataRegents June/August Combined Pass Rate
Global History 53% (+5%)
Earth Science 31% (-1%)
English 54% (+5%)
U.S. History 76% (Same)
Algebra 81% (-3%)
Geometry 75% (Same)
Living Environment 77% (-1%)
Impact on P-Cohort
• After June Regents, 56% of “in-danger” students who had a chance to graduate from the targeted P-Cohort graduated (18/32)
• After August Regents/Summer School 68.5% of students in the “in-danger” of graduating P-Cohort graduated (22/32)
Middle School Data - ELA
Successes6th Grade Those performing at Level 3/4 on Exam
went up by 7.83%
Compared to city that went up by 1.97%
8th GradeThe cohort of students in the 8th grade
had a 9.58% increase in the number of students performing at Level 3/4 compared to when they were in 7th grade
The average city increase was 3.48%
Challenges6th Grade5.6% below the city average of 25.27% of
student performing at levels 3/4 on State Test
7th GradeDrop in students performing at level 3/4 from
dropped by 9.72%
compared to city average increased by 1.26%
8th GradeDrop of 50% of students performing at level 4
from 7th to 8th Grade (2 to 1)
Middle School Data - MATHSuccesses6th GradeStudents performing at Level 3/4 had an
increase of 9.98%,
Compared to the city average increase of 4.97%
7th GradeThe cohort of students who were in the 7th
grade had a 6.12% increase in students performing at levels 3/4 compared to when those same students were in 6th grade
Compared to a 4.60% increase in the city
8th GradeThere was a 7% drop in the number of
students who were scoring at a Level 1 in the 8th grade class, compared to when they were in 7th grade
Challenges
7th GradeThe percentage of students performing
at level 3/4 dropped by 1.18 percent,
compared to the city average which rose by 4.6%
8th gradeThe Cohort of 8th grade students had a
drop of 4.12% of students performing at Level 3/4, compared to when they were in 7th grade.
The city had a drop of 2.94% from the same cohort moving from 7th-8th grade
Using the Data for This Year
• Sept – Baseline Data from DDC Baselines or MOSL Baselines– Work on Aligning items to standards in DDC
• Sept/Oct – ARIS Item Analysis Results for MS Tests– Adjust pacing/lessons and curriculum maps to reflect
how challenges are being addressed• Develop Instructional Foci based on item analysis
results Keep working on Questioning and Discussion techniques throughout