8
Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15

Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Reflection on Data

2013-14…2014-15

Page 2: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Regents Scores June 2012-14

Algebra Geomety English U.S. History Global History Earth Science Living Environment Algebra 2 Chemistry0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

201220132014

Page 3: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

June Regents Data

Chemistry 0% 33%

Page 4: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

June/August Regents DataRegents June/August Combined Pass Rate

Global History 53% (+5%)

Earth Science 31% (-1%)

English 54% (+5%)

U.S. History 76% (Same)

Algebra 81% (-3%)

Geometry 75% (Same)

Living Environment 77% (-1%)

Page 5: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Impact on P-Cohort

• After June Regents, 56% of “in-danger” students who had a chance to graduate from the targeted P-Cohort graduated (18/32)

• After August Regents/Summer School 68.5% of students in the “in-danger” of graduating P-Cohort graduated (22/32)

Page 6: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Middle School Data - ELA

Successes6th Grade Those performing at Level 3/4 on Exam

went up by 7.83%

Compared to city that went up by 1.97%

8th GradeThe cohort of students in the 8th grade

had a 9.58% increase in the number of students performing at Level 3/4 compared to when they were in 7th grade

The average city increase was 3.48%

Challenges6th Grade5.6% below the city average of 25.27% of

student performing at levels 3/4 on State Test

7th GradeDrop in students performing at level 3/4 from

dropped by 9.72%

compared to city average increased by 1.26%

8th GradeDrop of 50% of students performing at level 4

from 7th to 8th Grade (2 to 1)

Page 7: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Middle School Data - MATHSuccesses6th GradeStudents performing at Level 3/4 had an

increase of 9.98%,

Compared to the city average increase of 4.97%

7th GradeThe cohort of students who were in the 7th

grade had a 6.12% increase in students performing at levels 3/4 compared to when those same students were in 6th grade

Compared to a 4.60% increase in the city

8th GradeThere was a 7% drop in the number of

students who were scoring at a Level 1 in the 8th grade class, compared to when they were in 7th grade

Challenges

7th GradeThe percentage of students performing

at level 3/4 dropped by 1.18 percent,

compared to the city average which rose by 4.6%

8th gradeThe Cohort of 8th grade students had a

drop of 4.12% of students performing at Level 3/4, compared to when they were in 7th grade.

The city had a drop of 2.94% from the same cohort moving from 7th-8th grade

Page 8: Reflection on Data 2013-14…2014-15. Regents Scores June 2012-14

Using the Data for This Year

• Sept – Baseline Data from DDC Baselines or MOSL Baselines– Work on Aligning items to standards in DDC

• Sept/Oct – ARIS Item Analysis Results for MS Tests– Adjust pacing/lessons and curriculum maps to reflect

how challenges are being addressed• Develop Instructional Foci based on item analysis

results Keep working on Questioning and Discussion techniques throughout