Upload
rylee-ashbridge
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reducing cash transactions: the Italian Banking Association’s experience
Tirana, 28.07.2008
Oscar Occhipinti
2
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project
3 Conclusions
3
Percentage (%) of cash transactions on card and other cashless payments
Italy Germany
92,6 90,381,2 78 76 69,2 74,4 67,1 71,6 64,8 64,8 58,8
3,9 9,113 8,1
12,3 11,7 16,9 11,6 15,9
6,615,8 18,1 14,9 17,8 17,5 20,6 16,7 18,3 23,6 25,33,11,63
5,8
2000 2004 2000 2004 2000 2004 2000 2004 2000 2004 2000 2004
Contanti Carte Altri
Belgium Holland UK France
CAGR
Reference: ECB – Bluebook 2006
-2,6 -2,5 -2,4-2,3-1-0,6
In Italy the replacement of cash with other payment instruments proceeds slowly, less than in other European countries...
1. The European and Italian scenario
4
... although growth of card payments is consistent
Percentage (%) of card payments
11,5
11,7
8,1
9,1
3
1,6
15,9
16,9
12,3
13
3,9
3,1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
France
UK
Holland
Belgium
Germany
Italy
2000 2004
+16,7%
+7,1%
+12,5%
+11,1%
+9,7%
+8,4%
CAGR
Reference: ABI, ECB – Bluebook 2006; Banca d’Italia; Poste Italiane: Balance sheet 2004 and 2005; ABI; SSB 2005
1. The European and Italian scenario
5
Existence of a valid paymentinstrument alternative to cash
High fragmentation of the economic landscape
Cashless payments are not used in Italy mainly due to social and economic reasons ...
Cultural barriers Limited card acceptance by small merchants
Attitude to use electronic payments is weak
Modern payment instruments have never collected a sufficient critical mass
of clients
The Italian economic landscape is made of thousands of small merchants and not
of large merchants
Main causes for low
penetration of cashless instruments
Only 16.5% of merchants with less than 2 employees has a POS
1. The European and Italian scenario
6
The strongholds of cash
... while the reasons to prefer cash remain strong
• Widespread usage
• Transaction speed
• Anonymous
• No costs perceived
• Clear perception of spending amount
Reference: ABI
1. The European and Italian scenario
7
Cash is mainly used for low-value payments …
User Preference
Ticket Value
Low Medium High
Low
Medium
High
Debit card
Credit Card
Pre-paid card
CashPre-paid
card
Debit card
Credit Card
Credit Card
Debit Card
Pre-paid card
Cash
Cash
1. The European and Italian scenario
8
Average amount (€) of card payments in Europe 2003 - 2005
Debit Card – European average1
Credit Card – European average
Refernce: Blue Book August 2007
The growth index for debit cards is equal to 0,8%
The growth index for credit cards is equal to 2,1%
The growth index for the Italian PagoBancomat debit cards is equal to - 0,2%
... while cards are preferred for medium and high-value payments
1Italy, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Holland, UK
PagoBancomat - Italiy
49.6 50.1 50.4
68.3 69.071.2
63.1 62.7 62.8
2003 2004 2005
1. The European and Italian scenario
9
In Europe card transactions grow more than other cashless instruments ...
1. The European and Italian scenario
Reference: ECB Bluebook December 2007
1) Escluding pre-paid cards
Number of cashless transactions1) in EU25- Bln. trx; 2001-2006 -
38,4 38,3 41,2 44,3 46,4 48,7
25,323,0
21,018,9
17,214,9
53,3 55,560,1
65,369,4
74,0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Cards1)
Amount (€) of cashless transactions’1) in EU25- Bln. €; 2001-2006 -
401
340300
278277277
1,5
1,4
1,21,10,9 1,0
403341
301279278278
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Other cashless
instruments
Cards1)
CAGR‘01-’06
11%
5%
7%
CAGR‘01-’06
11%
8%
8%
Other cashless
instruments
10
3,5 3,9 4,1 4,4 5,0 5,3
2,8 3,1 3,4 3,84,2 4,7
2,03,3
4,04,6
5,25,7
6,5
2,01,9
1,71,5
1,3
0,80,7
0,70,6
0,60,6
0,80,80,7
0,70,6
0,5
12,013,7
15,116,7
18,4
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Number of debit card transactions1) per Country in EU 25
- Bln. trx; 2001-2006 -
CAGR‘01-06
11%
11%
9%7%
11%
Amount (€) of debit card transactions1) per Country in EU 25- Bln. €; 2001-2006 -
CAGR’01-’06
11%
13%
6%10%9%
Reference: ECB Bluebook December 2007
14% 12%
9% 11%181 194 209 247 269
201 218255
286328
124
166
199213
230
255
288
162
181
121116
109103
93
37
3431
2825
23
5453
494645
35
660754
808888
996
1.100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Italy
Other EU25
France
SpainGermany
1) Excluding pre-paid cards
Italy
Other EU25
France
SpainGermany
UK
20,1
UK
… and the Italian debit card market shows one of the best overall increases across Europe in the number of transactions …
1. The European and Italian scenario
11
Number of debit1) cards per Country in EU 25- Bln.; 2001-2006 -
CAGR‘01-’06
6%
3%
-1%
3%
Reference: ECB Bluebook December 2007
5%
-1%
38 40 42 44 46 56
54 59 63 66 6768
93 94 90 89 8988
33 33 33 33 323227 29 29 30 3031
97109 112 115 123
131
342369
387364 377
406
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Other EU25
Germany
UK
France
SpainItaly
1) Excluding pre-paid cards 2) Population older than 15
8%
Number of debit cards1) per inhabitant2) in some EU Countries
- # cards/inhabitant older than 15; 2006 -
1,1
1,4
1,2
0,8
0,6
Spain
Italy
France
UK
Germany
… although the circulation of debit cards in Italy is not as widespread as in other Countries in the EU 25 …
1. The European and Italian scenario
1211/04/23
… and the number of POS in Italy is within the European average
POS utilization in Europe
Indice di utilizzo del POS tra punti che accettano
carte
100
25
46
47
63
29
86
0 20 40 60 80 100Percentage (%)
1. The European and Italian scenario
13
Reference: A.T.Kearney using ECB and ECR data 2007
# trx/cards and utilization of debit cards in some EU Countries- 2006 -
1) Population older than 15
GermanySpain
Italy
France
UK
# debit cards/ person1)
# trx / cards
Dimension shows overall number of debit card transactions
Car
d u
tili
zati
on
Card penetration
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5
Number and utilization of debit cards in Italy compared to other EU Countries
1. The European and Italian scenario
14
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project• Overview• Non-regulatory measures• Regulatory measures• New products and services
3 Conclusions
15
Scope of the “War on Cash” project is to curb the use of cashP
os
sib
ile
ac
tio
ns
Non-regulatory measures
Regulatory measures New benefits for
merchants
Non-regulatory measures Regulatory measures Development of new
products and services
Merchant driven:Strengthen electronic payments’ acceptance
User driven:Incentivize use of electronic payments
Modern cashless instruments may produce new benefits
Dri
ve
rsS
co
pe Curb the use of cash by boosting utilization of cashless instruments
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project - Overview
16
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project• Overview• Non-regulatory measures• Regulatory measures• New products and services
3 Conclusions
17
The main non-regulatory measure adopted by the “War on Cash” project is a promotional-educational campaign on the use of cards
The “War on cash” promotional campaign
Value proposition: More cashless payments will reduce the use of cash and its costs
Scope
Multi-channel promotional and educational campaign developed by PagoBANCOMAT (Italian debit card) and VISA to:
Boost the use of debit and credit cards by stressing the advantages of such instruments compared to cash….
… also involving merchants
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – Non-regulatory measures
18
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project• Overview• Non-regulatory measures• Regulatory measures• New products and services
3 Conclusions
19
ABI has identified a series of possible regulatory measures …
“War on Cash” project: proposed regulatory measures
Definition of a cap to cash transactions
Definition of a cap above which wages/salaries cannot be paid by cash
Credit transfers to citizens must be executed by Public Administration Offices using modern payment means (for example, pre-paid cards)
De-taxation of specific contributions (for example, health insurance or home restructuring) only if paid by electronic means
Reduction or cancellation of registration taxes on basic bank accounts
1
3
4
5
6
Obligation for professionals, merchants and Public Administration Offices not to accept cash for payments which top a determined amount
2
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – Regulatory measures
20
… some have been already adopted …
Law n. 248 of 4 August 2006
Specific bank accounts
Professionals (such as lawyers, dentists, etc.) are obliged to open specific bank accounts, which must be kept separate from their personal ones, in order to collect all the earnings of their working activity
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – Regulatory measures
21
… some others have been adopted and then cancelled…
Law n. 248 of 4 August 2006
Payments to professionals
Professionals (such as lawyers, dentists, etc.) shall not be entitled to receive payments in cash for amounts which top 1.000 €.Such limit shall then come down to € 500 starting from 1st July 2007 and then to € 100 by 1st July 2008
Law Decree n. 112 of 25 June 2008
Proposed cancellation of the above-mentioned provision
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – Regulatory measures
22
… some new other regulatory measures will possibly be adopted
Law Decree n. 112 of 25 June 2008
Non-cash payment of taxes
Tax officers will be entitled to collect tax contributions paid by cashless means, such as credit cards and cheques.
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – Regulatory measures
23
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project• Overview• Non-regulatory measures• Regulatory measures• New products and services
3 Conclusions
24
The development of specific offers for small merchants may increase acceptance of cashless payments
Po
ss
ibil
e a
cti
on
s
Regulatory measures
Merchant awareness
New benefits for merchants
Merchant driven:Strengthening of
acceptance of cashless payments
Benefits deriving from cashless payments VS. Merchant dimension
Possible benefits
from cashless
payments
Merchant dimension
Small Medium Large
Increased acceptance by
small merchants would boost
overall usage of cashless payments
Possibile drivers Special pricing models (es. package
pricing) New technologies (es. CLess, Mobile
etc)
Commercial Driver
Infrastructural Driver
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – New products and services
25
M-Payment services, for example, can increase adoption of non-cash payments, representing a great opportunity for banks
M-Payment can reduce barriers to adoption of electronic money
Driver
Cash Electronic money
Cash, credit/debit card, ...
M-Payment
• Proximity Payment - Contactless
• Reduction of transaction time in payment execution
• No signature / PIN required
• Remote payment – Mobile Payment
• Increasing of purchase opportunities
• Developing of new payment services
Barriers: low penetration of POS, cost of services, ...
• New market opportunity
• Increase in purchase opportunities
• Increased adoption of electronic money instruments (i.e. credit/debit card, …)• Introduction of new, convenient and secure banking channel• Development of a value proposition that combines distinctive banking services such as M-
Banking (money transfers, stock trading, alerts, …) and M-Payment services• Increase in electronic money penetration
Direct impact
Indirect impact
2. ABI’s “War on Cash” project – New products and services
26
CONTENTS
1 The European and Italian scenario
2 ABI’s “War on Cash” project
3 Conclusions
27
Conclusions
Authorities’ iniziatives
Italian and European Authorities (EPC, European Central Bank, Banca d’Italia, ...) have identified the diffusion of cashless payments as a strategic driver towards modernization and internationalization of society. The SEPA start-up and the PSD publication have strengthened such commitment.
Clients’ needsClients (both users and merchants) claim safer, cheaper and highly accepted payment instruments. Furthermore, the rise of new needs (i.e. long-distance purchase, money transfer) suggest the development of modern payment instruments (i.e. mobile payments).
The role of the banking system
The banking system should play an outstanding role in the development of cashless payments, by promoting the use of current payment instruments and by developing new ones, capable of helping users eliminate barriers to their use.
3. Conclusions
28
THANKYOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Tirana, 28.07.2008