Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Reducing cancelation rate of planned elective interventional pain procedure at NCCCR
Cancer Pain Management Department : Qatar
Background/Purpose
Cancellations are a source of inconvenience, distress and frustration to both clinician and patient; it’s also, a waste of hospital time and resources, and lead to an
increase in waiting lists (1). Elective interventional cases cancellation refers to any interventional procedure case that is booked into the operation theatre list on the
day prior to procedure, but is canceled on scheduled day. The reasons for cancellation of elective surgical cases are many; they are as unique as they are similar.
In this small audit we set out to identify these reasons and thereby develop a simple intervention to reduce the number of cancellations.
.
Methods
1-Study design an setting
-This is a prospective observational hospital based
audit done between 1st January 2016 and 30
December, 2016. The audit was conducted in a 88
beds in oncology hospital with one operation theatre
(OT) which provide elective surgical to cancer patients.
The audit included all those patients who were posted
for elective interventional procedure over a period of
one year. Cancelled cases were identified from
predesigned OT utilization formats and the reasons for
cancellation were assessed through an audit tool which
was developed by pain team. In this small audit we set
out to identify these reasons of cancelation and thereby
develop a simple intervention to reduce the number of
cancellations. The initial audit done for the first six
months (January to June, 2016 ) and the second audit
conducted after intervention (from July to December,
2016) .it’s indeed for quality improvement analysis that
we applied the" audit technique" based on triple steps
(Review -Intervention- Evaluation).
2-Using audit and feedback to health professionals to
improve the qualityand safety of health care
Audit and feedback is widely used as a strategy to
improve professional practice either on its own or as a
component of multifaceted quality improvement
interventions. This is based on the belief that
healthcare professionals are prompted to modify their
practice when given performance feedback showing
that their clinical practice is inconsistent with a
desirable target. Despite its prevalence as a quality
improvement strategy, there remains uncertainty
regarding both the effectiveness of audit and feedback
in improving healthcare practice and the characteristics
of audit and feedback that lead to greater impact.
Results Goals / Objectives
The goal of this small audit was;
1- To identify the reasons of cancelation
2- To develop appropriate intervention in order to
reduce the rate of cancelation
3-To assess the effects of audit and feedback on the
practice of healthcare professionals and patient
outcomes and to examine factors that may explain
variation in the effectiveness of audit and feedback.
Audit Cycle
Variables N %
Gender
Female 49 92%
Male 27 8%
Nationality
Qatari 13 17%
Non-Qatari 63 83%
Age
≤ 40 year 36 47%
> 40 year 40 53%
Primary site of disease
Hematology 60 79%
Oncology 16 21%
Type of Procedure at NCCCR
MBB Diagnostic 19 29%
Sacroiliac joint injections 8 12%
Nerve Root diagnostic 1 2%
Caudal epidural 4 6%
Suprascapular nerve block+ Acromioclavicular joint
injection 14 22%
Ultrasound Guided Injection 2 3%
Stellate ganglion block 2 3%
Acromio-Clavicular Joint Injections 1 2%
Steroid injections 3 5%
Greater occipital nerve block 2 3%
Impar gangelion injection 8 12%
Infraorbital nerve block 1 2%
Current Year:
2016
Analysis/Action:
Jan-16 Analysis/Findings: one procedure from 2 was
cancelled.
1/2 Action Plan: to analyze the data and identify
the cause.
50%
Feb-16 Analysis/Findings: 5 procedures from 10
were cancelled.
5/10 Action Plan: to analyze the data and identify
the cause.
50%
Mar-16 Analysis/Findings: one procedure from 9 was
cancelled.
1/9 Action Plan: to analyze the data and identify
the cause.
11%
Apr-16 Analysis/Findings: 4 procedures from 7 were
cancelled.
4/7 Action Plan: to analyze the data and identify
the cause.
57%
May-16 Analysis/Findings: 4 procedures from 10
were cancelled.
4/10 Action Plan: to analyze the data and identify
the cause.
40%
Jun-16 Analysis/Finding: 1 procedure from 7 were
cancelled 1/7
14% Current Year:
2016
Analysis/Action:
July 16
1/4
25%
Analysis/Findings: one
procedure from 4 was
cancelled.
Action Plan: to analyze the data
and identify the cause.
AUG 16
3/12
25%
Analysis/Findings: 3 procedures
from 12 were cancelled.
Action Plan: to analyze the data
and identify the cause.
September 16 Analysis/Findings: one case
was done no cancelation
October 16 Analysis/Findings: one
procedure done there was no
cancelation
November 16
1/4
25%
Analysis/Findings: 1 procedure
from 4 were cancelled.
Action Plan: to analyze the data
and identify the cause.
Dec 16 Analysis/Finding:3 procedure
done there was no cancelation
• Physician spend long time explaining the procedure to patients
• CNS introduced to see the patient at day care before procedure
• Improve patient engagement by involving him/her more in care plan
• The effective utilization of the call system services was reinforced.
35%
20%
First semester2016
Secondsemester 2016
Parameter first semster
Second
semester
Number of Interventional
procedures(N) 52 24
Procedures done (N) 36 19
Procedure cancelled (N) 16 5
50% 50%
11%
57%
30%
14%
67%
25%
0% 0%
25%
0% 0%
20%40%60%80%
100%
Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16
Perc
en
tag
e%
Calendar Time (Months)
Cancellation of booked elective pain procedure is a
common problem across all hospitals in our country and
around the world (1). The incidence of cancellation of
elective procedure has been reported in literature to
range from 20% to 40% [1,2,3]. This audit shows decrease
cancelation by 15% after a minor intervention done by
pain team.
Conclusion
Recommendation
Pamphlet was developed by pain team and waiting for
approval
CNS clinic was established in order to provide adequate
education and addressing patients’ concern.
References 1. Chiu, C. H., Lee, A., & Chui, P. T. (2012). Cancellation of elective operations on the day of intended surgery in a Hong
Kong hospital: point prevalence and reasons. Hong Kong Med J, 18(1), 5-10.
2.Narouze, S., Benzon, H. T., Provenzano, D. A., Buvanendran, A., De Andres, J., Deer, T. R., ... & Huntoon, M. A. (2015).
Interventional spine and pain procedures in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications: guidelines from the
american society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine, the European society of regional anaesthesia and pain
therapy, the american academy of pain medicine, the international neuromodulation society, the north american
neuromodulation society, and the world institute of pain. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 40(3), 182-212.
3.Ojo E.O., Ihezue C.H (2008). An Audit of Day Case Cancellations In A Nigerian Tertiary Hospital Based Day Case Unit
East and Central African Journal of Surgery; 13 (2); 150- 153.
Team member :
Ms. Khadra Yassin , Mr. Hafedh Ghazouani
Dr. Ahmed Fayed Ahmed El Geziry , Dr. Wael Saleem
Mr. Atef Mansour Mrawweh Al Tawafsheh, Ms. Mariamma Thomas