266
Page 1 of 266 Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, Statutory Instrument 2010/490 Table 1: Plan or project details Type of plan or project: The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) marine licence requires a variation to the designated disposal site for the marine licence for maintenance dredging at Her Majesty’s Naval Base (HMNB) Devonport. Disposal of dredged material is proposed to be undertaken at Plymouth Deep (PL035). Licence start date is 1st March 2016 and end date is 31st March 2017. The application is for two major dredging campaigns during this 14 month period, totalling 63,448 cubic metres of sediment with additional minor campaigns during the year (subject to seasonal restrictions). The dredge areas are likely to be dredged by one trailer suction hopper dredger (TSHD) at any one time with an estimated hopper capacity of 3,500 cubic metres, although depending on the dredging requirements this could increase to a hopper size of approximately 6,000 cubic metres. There may also be the requirement for smaller vessels where access is difficult for the main TSHD. In all cases the main plant will be supported by a plough dredger for bed levelling. Submersible pumps will be employed in certain small areas that are inaccessible to any other dredging methods. Disposal of dredge material will be at Plymouth Deep (PL035). There are no terrestrial aspects to this marine licence application. MMO reference no: MLA/2015/00336/1. National grid reference or WGS co-ordinates: Dredge Area NY10 50°23.3106'N 04°11.4230'W 50°23.3116'N 04°11.4262'W 50°23.3109'N 04°11.4295'W 50°23.3017'N 04°11.4251'W 50°23.2893'N 04°11.4194'W 50°23.2931'N 04°11.4176'W 50°23.2945'N 04°11.4150'W 50°23.2964'N 04°11.4054'W 50°23.3006'N 04°11.4072'W 50°23.3016'N 04°11.4077'W 50°23.3066'N 04°11.4100'W 50°23.3116'N 04°11.4125'W 50°23.3103'N 04°11.4210'W 50°23.3106'N 04°11.4230'W

Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 1 of 266

Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, Statutory Instrument 2010/490

Table 1: Plan or project details

Type of plan or project: The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) marine licence requires a

variation to the designated disposal site for the marine licence for maintenance

dredging at Her Majesty’s Naval Base (HMNB) Devonport. Disposal of dredged

material is proposed to be undertaken at Plymouth Deep (PL035).

Licence start date is 1st March 2016 and end date is 31st March 2017. The

application is for two major dredging campaigns during this 14 month period,

totalling 63,448 cubic metres of sediment with additional minor campaigns

during the year (subject to seasonal restrictions). The dredge areas are likely to

be dredged by one trailer suction hopper dredger (TSHD) at any one time with

an estimated hopper capacity of 3,500 cubic metres, although depending on the

dredging requirements this could increase to a hopper size of approximately

6,000 cubic metres. There may also be the requirement for smaller vessels

where access is difficult for the main TSHD. In all cases the main plant will be

supported by a plough dredger for bed levelling. Submersible pumps will be

employed in certain small areas that are inaccessible to any other dredging

methods.

Disposal of dredge material will be at Plymouth Deep (PL035).

There are no terrestrial aspects to this marine licence application.

MMO reference no: MLA/2015/00336/1.

National grid reference

or WGS co-ordinates:

Dredge Area NY10 50°23.3106'N 04°11.4230'W 50°23.3116'N 04°11.4262'W 50°23.3109'N 04°11.4295'W 50°23.3017'N 04°11.4251'W 50°23.2893'N 04°11.4194'W 50°23.2931'N 04°11.4176'W 50°23.2945'N 04°11.4150'W 50°23.2964'N 04°11.4054'W 50°23.3006'N 04°11.4072'W 50°23.3016'N 04°11.4077'W 50°23.3066'N 04°11.4100'W 50°23.3116'N 04°11.4125'W 50°23.3103'N 04°11.4210'W 50°23.3106'N 04°11.4230'W

Page 2: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 2 of 266

Dredge Areas NY1/NY2/NY3/NY4/NY7/NY8 50°23.5780'N 04°11.2513'W 50°23.5841'N 04°11.2186'W 50°23.6087'N 04°11.2299'W 50°23.6032'N 04°11.2626'W 50°23.5991'N 04°11.2607'W 50°23.5242'N 04°11.6585'W 50°23.5210'N 04°11.6735'W 50°23.5477'N 04°11.6855'W 50°23.5396'N 04°11.7285'W 50°23.5307'N 04°11.7727'W 50°23.5147'N 04°11.7938'W 50°23.4980'N 04°11.7893'W 50°23.4704'N 04°11.9336'W 50°23.4006'N 04°11.8005'W 50°23.3800'N 04°11.7609'W 50°23.3331'N 04°11.6712'W 50°23.2943'N 04°11.5967'W 50°23.2778'N 04°11.5650'W 50°22.9656'N 04°11.4181'W 50°22.9785'N 04°11.3484'W 50°22.9824'N 04°11.3293'W 50°23.1386'N 04°11.4024'W 50°23.2119'N 04°11.4370'W 50°23.2927'N 04°11.4737'W 50°23.3109'N 04°11.4821'W 50°23.3432'N 04°11.5418'W 50°23.3794'N 04°11.6129'W 50°23.4005'N 04°11.6542'W 50°23.4259'N 04°11.6216'W 50°23.4054'N 04°11.5822'W 50°23.4592'N 04°11.5134'W 50°23.5166'N 04°11.2143'W 50°23.5193'N 04°11.2157'W 50°23.5478'N 04°11.2275'W 50°23.5742'N 04°11.2397'W 50°23.5725'N 04°11.2487'W 50°23.5780'N 04°11.2513'W

Table 2: Details of European sites

Name and legal status of sites: Name of sites Legal status

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries Special Area of Conservation

Table 3: Features list

Features The application has associated

hazards to which features are

sensitive?

Details of hazard

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries SAC

Estuaries Yes Maintenance Dredging

Large shallow inlets and bays Yes Maintenance Dredging

Sandbanks which are slightly

covered by sea water all the time

Yes Maintenance Dredging

Allis shad, Alosa alosa Yes Maintenance Dredging

Page 3: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 3 of 266

Appropriate Assessment In accordance with Natural England’s (NE) guidance for using draft Conservation Advice

Packages the following steps were taken with regard to Conservation Advice for Special

Area of Conservation: Plymouth Sound and Estuaries (UK0013111).

- Using the “Advice on Operations” (AoO) document to determine pressures

associated with the activity (Maintenance dredging) that could harm the designated

habitat and/or species features of the site.

- Screening the identified pressures of the activity in or out of further assessment.

- Using the draft conservation objectives and the supplementary advice tables of the

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries SAC supplementary advice document to assess the

impacts of the remaining pressures on the important1 attributes of each feature at

the site.

Advice on Operations Screening

Pathways between features and all pressures, identified in the AoO section of

Conservation advice for the SAC: Conservation Advice for Special Area of Conservation:

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries (UK0013111) were assessed. Where there was a pathway

for disturbance between the pressure and the feature, the sensitivity of the feature to that

pressure was assessed to ascertain which pressure/feature interactions would require

further assessment.

Where an impact cannot be ruled out the pressure/feature interaction has been screened

out of further assessment.

1Only those that will most efficiently and directly help to define condition, these attributes should be clearly

capable of identifying a change in condition.

Page 4: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 4 of 266

Table 4: Screening of pressure/feature interactions to be taken forward into further assessment. Grey interactions have been screened out and red

interactions have been taken forward.

Pressure Estuaries

ASM CR IfR IMS IM IR ISB SMS SM SS SSB

Above water noise

Abrasion/disturbance of the substrate on the surface of the seabed

NR NR S NR S S S S

Barrier to species movement

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) iS iS NS iS S S S S

Collision ABOVE water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Collision BELOW water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Deoxygenation

Emergence regime changes – local, including tidal level change considerations

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

NR NR S NR S S S S

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Introduction of light

Introduction of other substances (solid, liquid or gas)

Introduction or spread of non-indigenous species

Nutrient enrichment

Penetration and/or disturbance of the substrate below the surface of the seabed, including abrasion

NR NR S NR S S S S

Radionuclide contamination

Siltation rate changes (High), including smothering (depth of vertical sediment overburden)

NR NR S NR S S S S

Siltation rate changes (Low), including smothering (depth of vertical sediment overburden)

iS iS NS iS S S S S

Page 5: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 5 of 266

Synthetic compound contamination (incl. pesticides, antifoulants, pharmaceuticals). Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Transition elements & organo-metal (e.g. TBT) contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Underwater noise changes

Vibration

Visual disturbance

Water flow (tidal current) changes – local, including sediment transport considerations

Pressure

Large Shallow inlets and bays Sandbanks which are slightly

covered by seawater all the time

Allis shad

(Alosa

alosa) CR IfR IR SCS SMS SM SS SSB SCS SMS SM SS SSB

Above water noise

Abrasion/disturbance of the substrate on the surface of the seabed

NR NR NR S S S S S S S S NR

Barrier to species movement S

Changes in suspended solids (water clarity) iS iS iS S S S S S S S S S

Collision ABOVE water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Collision BELOW water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Deoxygenation

Emergence regime changes – local, including tidal level change considerations

Habitat structure changes - removal of substratum (extraction)

NR NR NR S S S S S S S S IE

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Introduction of light

Introduction of other substances (solid, liquid or gas)

Introduction or spread of non-indigenous species

Nutrient enrichment

Page 6: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 6 of 266

Penetration and/or disturbance of the substrate below the surface of the seabed, including abrasion

NR NR NR S S S S S S S S NR

Radionuclide contamination

Siltation rate changes (High), including smothering (depth of vertical sediment overburden)

NR NR NR S S S S S S S S NR

Siltation rate changes (Low), including smothering (depth of vertical sediment overburden)

iS iS iS S S S S S S S S NR

Synthetic compound contamination (incl. pesticides, antifoulants, pharmaceuticals). Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Transition elements & organo-metal (e.g. TBT) contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Underwater noise changes

Vibration

Visual disturbance

Water flow (tidal current) changes – local, including sediment transport considerations

Legend: ASM – Atlantic Salt Meadows, CR – Circalittoral Rock, IfR – Infralittoral Rock, IMS – Intertidal Mixed Sediments, IM – Intertidal Mud, IR – Intertidal Rock,

ISB – Intertidal Seagrass Beds, SMS – Subtidal Mixed Sediments, SM – Subtidal Mud, SS – Subtidal Sand, SSB – Subtidal Seagrass Beds, SCS – Subtidal Coarse

Sediments, S – Sensitive, IE – Insufficient Evidence, NS – Not sensitive, NR – Not relevant, iS – Indirect Sensitive.

Page 7: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 7 of 266

Rationale for screening

Both features and pressures were screened out in bulk where possible.

Only features that were present within the vicinity of the proposed activities were screened

into further assessment as there is no significant pathway for direct or indirect impacts

from the above activities due to the location of the feature in relation to the proposed

activities.

Dredging can potentially increase the levels of suspended sediment within the area,

however the Tamar is a naturally turbid area with 5,000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8,300 wet tonnes) suspended due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164,000 cubic metres (27,300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the

estuary, silt content of the water column is at 80% (See Baseline Document for

Maintenance Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European Marine Site).

Considering the probable daily volumes of sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

Atlantic salt meadows (Glauco-Puccinellietalia maritimae) have also been screened out as

a subfeature because it was concluded there would be No Likely Significant Effect on the

feature from dredging and activities.

See table 5 for further detail.

Table 5: Features not taken forward to appropriate assessment as there is no realistic pathway at the

reported distance.

Subfeature Approximate Distance

Estuaries

Intertidal Mixed Sediments 3km upstream

Subtidal sand 6.7km downstream

Large shallow inlets and bays

Subtidal sand 6.7km downstream

Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time

Subtidal sand 6.7km downstream

Pressures were screened out of requiring further consideration when all of the features

were not sensitive to these pressures. The sensitivity to pressures is provided in the AoO

section of Conservation advice for the SAC: Plymouth Sound and Estuaries Special Area

of Conservation: marine conservation advice (UK0013111).

Natural England categorizes pressures as either ‘High to Medium Risk’ or ‘Low Risk’. The

recommendation for Low Risk pressures is ‘Unless there are evidence based case or site

specific factors that increase the risk, or uncertainty on the level of pressure on a receptor,

this pressure generally does not occur at a level of concern and should not require

consideration as part of an assessment.’

Page 8: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 8 of 266

The following pressures are Low Risk and have therefore been assessed against the

project and screened out:

Above water noise

Collision ABOVE water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Collision BELOW water with static or moving objects not naturally found in the marine environment (e.g., boats, machinery, and structures)

Deoxygenation

Emergence regime changes – local, including tidal level change considerations

Hydrocarbon & PAH contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Introduction of light

Introduction of other substances (solid, liquid or gas)

Introduction or spread of non-indigenous species

Nutrient enrichment

Radionuclide contamination

Synthetic compound contamination (incl. pesticides, antifoulants, pharmaceuticals). Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Transition elements & organo-metal (e.g. TBT) contamination. Includes those priority substances listed in Annex II of Directive 2008/105/EC.

Underwater noise changes

Vibration

Visual disturbance

Water flow (tidal current) changes – local, including sediment transport considerations

For all activities, pressures were then screened out of requiring further consideration for

some designated features but not all. See table 7 for further detail.

Table 7: Pressures not taken forward to appropriate assessment as some features of the site are not

sensitive to the pressure.

Pressure Feature/s screened out Justification

Barrier to species

movement

Estuaries and associated subfeatures;

Large shallow inlets and bays;

Sandbanks which are slightly covered by

sea water all the time and associated

subfeatures.

These features are not vulnerable

to this pressure.

Given the natural turbidity of the

Tamar the MMO does not consider

that these feature/pressure

interactions require further

assessment.

For the remaining pressure/feature interactions, the sensitivity of the feature to the

remaining pressures was obtained from the AoO document within the draft Conservation

Advice Package.

Page 9: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 9 of 266

For the remaining pressure/feature interactions there were four possible outcomes:

1. The individual pressure/feature interactions that were assessed as Not Sensitive at the benchmark were then screened out of requiring consideration under Stage 1. The MMO considers that the impacts on these features as a result of the activities will be less than the benchmarks specified for these pressure/feature interactions. A full list of pressure/feature interaction benchmarks can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/conservation-advice-for-marine-protected-areas-pressure-benchmarks

2. Feature/pressure interactions that were deemed to be not relevant (the evidence base suggests that there is no interaction of concern between the pressure and the feature OR the activity and the feature could not interact) were then screened out of requiring consideration under appropriate assessment.

3. Features that were deemed sensitive to individual pressures for both direct and indirect pathways were screened into Stage 1 assessment.

4. Features where there was insufficient evidence to ascertain sensitivity were screened into the appropriate assessment in accordance with the precautionary principle.

Stage 1 Assessment

The pressure/feature interactions that fell under the scope of items 3 and 4 above

are assessed in the below section. In accordance with NE advice, the draft

Conservation Advice Packages were used to obtain important targets within the

Supplementary Advice Tables to inform decision making. For pressures where

potential impacts to features are of a similar nature, those pressures have been

bulked to save repetition during this assessment.

Page 10: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 10 of 266

Table 8: Appropriate Assessment for Plymouth Sound and Estuaries SAC

Pressure Interest

feature

Subfeatu

re

Favourable

condition

target for

relevant

attribute

(including

range of

natural

variation)

based on

conservatio

n objectives

Contribut

ion of

attribute

to

ecologic

al

structure

and

function

of site

Contributi

on of

manageme

nt or other

unauthoris

ed sources

to attribute

and /or

feature

condition

Adverse effect of proposal alone on attribute

and/or feature

Adverse

effect of

proposal

in

combinat

ion with

other

plans or

projects,

on

attribute

and /or

feature

Can

adverse

affects

be

avoided

?

Adverse

affect on

integrity

(long

term or

short

term)

(yes, no

or

uncertai

n)?

Abrasion

/disturban

ce of the

substrate

on the

surface of

the

seabed

&

Penetrati

on and/or

disturban

ce of the

substrate

below the

surface of

the

Estuarie

s

Intertidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

intertidal

mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 11: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 11 of 266

seabed,

including

abrasion

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

Page 12: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 12 of 266

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

presence of

topographic

features of

the feature,

whilst

allowing for

natural

responses to

hydrodynami

c regime, by

Topograp

hic

changes

can alter

the way

the

sediment

drains

and holds

water, this

can

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 13: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 13 of 266

preventing

erosion or

deposition

through

human

induced

activity.

influence

the

animal

and plant

communiti

es

supported

and

reduce

the areas

available

to coastal

birds for

feeding.

Intertidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

seagrass

beds.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 14: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 14 of 266

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

Page 15: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 15 of 266

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to sediment contaminants and

ephemeral opportunistic macroalgae.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

Page 16: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 16 of 266

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

Macroalgae overlies the seagrass and prevents

primary production. This is an ephemeral issue

which may be related to elevated residual

nutrient levels. The disturbance of sediments

may cause nutrient enrichment.

However, the Tamar is a naturally turbid area

with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

Page 17: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 17 of 266

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

Activity

around

the edge

of a bed

may

result in

changes

to the

sediment

compositi

on and

exposure,

and

erosion

can occur

leaving

rhizomes

uncovere

d and

vulnerabl

e,

reducing

the

extent.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Subtidal Maintain the A As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area. As above. No As above.

Page 18: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 18 of 266

mixed

sediments

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

Page 19: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 19 of 266

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

Page 20: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 20 of 266

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

Page 21: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 21 of 266

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause abrasion,

penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 22: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 22 of 266

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

Page 23: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 23 of 266

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

Page 24: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 24 of 266

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 25: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 25 of 266

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

Page 26: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 26 of 266

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Page 27: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 27 of 266

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Estuaries

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the estuary

to ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause abrasion, penetration

and/or disturbance of this feature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 28: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 28 of 266

resilience

of the

feature.

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

Page 29: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 29 of 266

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~63%), Unfavourable (~2%), Unfavourable:

declining (~27%), Not assessed (~8%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain the

characteristic

morphology

of the

estuary.

Morpholo

gy is an

essential

structural

compone

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 30: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 30 of 266

nt of an

estuary

and

dictates

the

distributio

n and

compositi

on of its

substrate,

and

therefore

its

habitats

and

species.

Maintain

characteristic

physical form

(eg coastal

plain, bar

built, ria,

complex),

topographic

features of

the estuary

and the

overall

topography

on which

morphologica

l regime

relies.

Changes

in

topograph

y, eg

altering

the slope

of the

shore, will

change

the

exposure

/ extent of

habitats.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 31: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 31 of 266

Large

shallow

inlets

and

bays

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 32: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 32 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

Page 33: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 33 of 266

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition). The assessment is

also based on elevated sediment contaminant

levels; this includes elevated Mercury, Copper,

Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons

(PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

Page 34: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 34 of 266

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 35: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 35 of 266

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

Page 36: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 36 of 266

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

Page 37: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 37 of 266

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause abrasion,

penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 38: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 38 of 266

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

Page 39: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 39 of 266

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

Page 40: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 40 of 266

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 41: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 41 of 266

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

Page 42: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 42 of 266

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Page 43: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 43 of 266

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Large

shallow

inlets and

bays

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the large

shallow inlet

and bay to

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

whilst

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

As above. This feature is c4km downstream of the dredge

area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause abrasion,

penetration and/or disturbance of this feature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 44: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 44 of 266

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

Page 45: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 45 of 266

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~36%), Unfavourable (~5%), Unfavourable:

declining (~41%), Not assessed (~18%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

Page 46: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 46 of 266

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain the

characteristic

morphologica

l regime of

the large

shallow inlet

and bay.

Morpholo

gy is an

essential

structural

compone

nt of large

shallow

inlets and

bays and

dictates

the

distributio

n and

compositi

on of

substrate,

and

therefore

the

habitats

and

species

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

characteristic

physical form

and

topographic

features of

the large

shallow inlet

Changes

in

topograph

y, eg

altering

the slope

of the

shore, will

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 47: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 47 of 266

and bay, and

the overall

topography

on which

morphology

relies.

change

the

exposure

/ extent of

habitats.

Sandba

nks

which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawate

r all the

time

Subtidal

coarse

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 48: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 48 of 266

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

Page 49: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 49 of 266

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition). The assessment is

also based on elevated sediment contaminant

levels; this includes elevated Mercury, Copper,

Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons

(PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Page 50: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 50 of 266

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 51: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 51 of 266

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

Page 52: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 52 of 266

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

Page 53: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 53 of 266

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause abrasion,

penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 54: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 54 of 266

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

Page 55: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 55 of 266

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

Page 56: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 56 of 266

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

Page 57: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 57 of 266

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause

abrasion, penetration and/or disturbance of this

subfeature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 58: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 58 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

Page 59: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 59 of 266

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Sandbank

s which

are

slightly

covered

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause abrasion, penetration

and/or disturbance of this feature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

No. Please see in combination

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 60: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 60 of 266

by

seawater

all the

time

(feature)

sandbanks to

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The characteristics of the dredge sediments are

such that penetration of below the surface of the

seabed is not a significant risk.

assessment below.

Page 61: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 61 of 266

Increased suspended sediment may cause

abrasion/disturbance to the surface of the

seabed. However, the dredging methodology

includes both trailer suction hopper dredging

and plough dredging. Real time monitoring buoy

data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence

application – Appendix C – Technical Note

Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any

changes in turbidity associated with plough

dredging operations are generally within the

levels of natural variation associated with this

part of the estuary. As greater increases in

turbidity, and any subsequent changes to water

clarity, dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and

organic enrichment and siltation rates, are

expected from plough dredging due to the

nature of the activity, trailer suction hopper

dredging is also expected to be within

acceptable limits for changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~8%), Unfavourable (~9%), Unfavourable:

declining (~83%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed in the sections

Page 62: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 62 of 266

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Barrier to

species

movemen

t

Allis

shad

(Alosa

alosa)

N/A Restore the

presence

and spatial

distribution of

the species

and their

ability to

undertake

key life cycle

stages and

behaviours.

It is

important

to

consider

the key

life stages

and

behaviour

s of a

species

as this

may

influence

its

distributio

n and

ultimately

populatio

n

abundanc

e.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

Allis shad use the estuary as a route to their

breeding grounds. Shad grow in coastal waters

and then migrate up estuaries to spawn. There

is one known spawning ground on the Tamar

which is located just below the Gunnislake Weir.

As part of the advice received from the

Environment Agency and Natural England on

the HMNB Devonport plough dredging marine

licence application, March 2015,

MLA/2015/00065, a phased approach to

dredging the main channel was agreed to

mitigate for potential impacts to migratory fish

within the estuary.

As a precautionary measure dredging will be

restricted in the main channel areas during key

migratory windows (April to November). The

restricted area is set as the area of the channel

that lies more than 50m from the wharves. The

50m limit is to ensure that the dredge plume

does not cause any barrier to fish migration.

Restricting dredging to within the 50m limit will

allow a clear migration path along the western

extent of the channel for migrating species such

as salmon and Allis shad (from evidence

supplied by applicant to support the marine

licence application).

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

Dredgin

g within

the

estuary

channel

must be

carried

out

between

1st

Decemb

er and

31st

March

inclusive

.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 63: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 63 of 266

The dredge quantities are in line with previous

maintenance dredging in this area and the

applicant has confirmed that all works in excess

of 50m from the wharves will be undertaken

between December and March, as set out in the

‘Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging

in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site’. These timings minimise

disturbance to the feature. The applicant has

stated that overflowing of the hopper whilst

trailer suction hopper dredging will not occur,

this will further reduce the amount of sediment

entering the water column.

The applicant has also stated they are content to

continue with previous licence conditions that

restrict dredging during the migratory seasons

(April to November). If a positive determination

is made, this condition will be added to the

licence.

This feature has been assessed as

Unfavourable. Based primarily on the barrier to

migration at Gunnislake. This is the only known

breeding site in the UK for Allis Shad and the

barrier continues to prevent the majority of the

population from reaching their optimal spawning

grounds in freshwater and therefore impacts

shad population, size and distribution, as well as

limiting connectivity between the estuary and the

river for other migratory fish species.

The barrier to migration identified is not related

to the dredging activities. Barriers to migration

Page 64: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 64 of 266

will not be increased by dredging activity. The

Tamar is a naturally turbid area with 5000 cubic

metres of sediment (approximately 8300 wet

tonnes) suspended due to tidal action each day,

seasonally (summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic

metres (27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the

estuary, silt content of the water column is at

80% (See Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this feature.

Restore the

reproductive

and

recruitment

capability of

the species.

A

reduction

in the

availabilit

y of

individual

s able to

successfu

lly

reproduce

, and

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As

above.

Page 65: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 65 of 266

survival

rates,

may

impact

the

overall

size and

age-

structure

of the

populatio

n.

Restore

connectivity

of estuarine

features to

surrounding

rivers,

freshwater,

marine and

coastal

habitats, to

ensure larval

dispersal and

recruitment,

maintain

nursery

grounds for

mobile

species, and

to allow

movement of

migratory

Estuaries

are

valuable

as a

nursery

ground,

connectin

g habitat

for

migratory

species

(both

adult

access to

spawning

grounds

and

seaward

migration

of

juveniles).

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As

above.

Page 66: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 66 of 266

species.

Changes

in

suspende

d solids

(water

clarity)

Estuarie

s

Circalittor

al rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c3km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 67: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 67 of 266

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

Page 68: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 68 of 266

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Infralittora

l rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature is c0.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 69: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 69 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Page 70: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 70 of 266

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Intertidal

rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature is c1.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 71: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 71 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Page 72: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 72 of 266

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Intertidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

natural light

availability to

the seagrass

bed.

Low light

availabilit

y reduces

respiratio

n and

productivit

y by the

roots and

rhizomes,

lowering

nutrient

uptake.

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 73: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 73 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Page 74: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 74 of 266

Unfavourable due to sediment contaminants and

ephemeral opportunistic macroalgae.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

Macroalgae overlies the seagrass and prevents

primary production. This is an ephemeral issue

which may be related to elevated residual

nutrient levels. The disturbance of sediments

may cause nutrient enrichment.

However, the Tamar is a naturally turbid area

with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

Page 75: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 75 of 266

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 76: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 76 of 266

habitat. the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 77: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 77 of 266

d

communiti

es.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

Page 78: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 78 of 266

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Page 79: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 79 of 266

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 80: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 80 of 266

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

Page 81: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 81 of 266

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

Page 82: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 82 of 266

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

natural light

availability to

the seagrass

bed.

Low light

availabilit

y reduces

respiratio

n and

productivit

y by the

roots and

rhizomes,

lowering

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 83: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 83 of 266

nutrient

uptake.

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

Page 84: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 84 of 266

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

A

reduction

in light

levels due

to

turbidity

could

reduce

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 85: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 85 of 266

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

the depth

limit of

seagrass

es,

affecting

their

health

and

communiti

es.

Estuaries

(feature)

Maintain

sediment

regime and

budget within

the estuary,

including

sediment

sources,

sinks and

movement.

If the

sediment

budget or

sediment

movemen

t is

restricted

this can

cause the

decline

and

erosion,

or

change,

of

habitats.

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increase of suspended

sediment.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 86: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 86 of 266

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

Page 87: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 87 of 266

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~63%), Unfavourable (~2%), Unfavourable:

declining (~27%), Not assessed (~8%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 88: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 88 of 266

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

Large

shallow

inlets

and

bays

Circalittor

al rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c3km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 89: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 89 of 266

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

Page 90: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 90 of 266

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Infralittora

l rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature is c0.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 91: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 91 of 266

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

Page 92: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 92 of 266

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Intertidal

rock

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature is c1.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 93: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 93 of 266

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

Page 94: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 94 of 266

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 95: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 95 of 266

es.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

Page 96: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 96 of 266

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

Page 97: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 97 of 266

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mixed

sediment

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

As

above.

Page 98: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 98 of 266

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

d.

Page 99: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 99 of 266

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

Page 100: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 100 of 266

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Page 101: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 101 of 266

Subtidal

mud

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 102: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 102 of 266

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

Page 103: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 103 of 266

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

Page 104: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 104 of 266

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

natural light

availability to

the seagrass

bed.

Low light

availabilit

y reduces

respiratio

n and

productivit

y by the

roots and

rhizomes,

lowering

nutrient

uptake.

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 105: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 105 of 266

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

Page 106: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 106 of 266

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

A

reduction

in light

levels due

to

turbidity

could

reduce

the depth

limit of

seagrass

es,

affecting

their

health

and

communiti

es.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Large

shallow

inlets and

bays

(feature)

Maintain

sediment

regime and

budget within

the large

shallow inlet

and bay,

including

sediment

Sediment

movemen

t, sources

and sinks

within,

and

interactin

g with,

large

As above. This feature is c4km downstream of the dredge

area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended sediment.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 107: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 107 of 266

sources,

sinks, and

movement.

shallow

inlets and

bays are

important

to

maintainin

g a

healthy

coastal

system

and

sediment

budget.

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Page 108: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 108 of 266

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~36%), Unfavourable (~5%), Unfavourable:

declining (~41%), Not assessed (~18%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain

natural levels

Prolonged

changes

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 109: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 109 of 266

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

Sandba

nks

which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawate

r all the

time

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 110: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 110 of 266

across the

habitat.

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

Page 111: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 111 of 266

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

Page 112: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 112 of 266

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

Page 113: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 113 of 266

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mixed

sediment

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 114: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 114 of 266

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

Page 115: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 115 of 266

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

Page 116: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 116 of 266

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 117: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 117 of 266

d

communiti

es.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

Page 118: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 118 of 266

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Page 119: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 119 of 266

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

natural light

availability to

the seagrass

bed.

Low light

availabilit

y reduces

respiratio

n and

productivit

y by the

roots and

rhizomes,

lowering

nutrient

uptake.

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increase of suspended solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 120: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 120 of 266

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

Page 121: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 121 of 266

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

A

reduction

in light

levels due

to

turbidity

could

reduce

the depth

limit of

seagrass

es,

affecting

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 122: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 122 of 266

their

health

and

communiti

es.

Sandbank

s which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawater

all the

time

(feature)

Maintain

natural levels

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material)

across the

habitat.

Prolonged

changes

in turbidity

may

influence

the

amount of

light

reaching

the

seabed,

affecting

the

primary

productio

n and

nutrient

levels of

the

habitat’s

associate

d

communiti

es.

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increase of suspended

solids.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 123: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 123 of 266

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

Page 124: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 124 of 266

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~8%), Unfavourable (~9%), Unfavourable:

declining (~83%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Allis

shad

(Alosa

alosa)

N/A Maintain the

natural

supply of

coarse and

fine sediment

to the river.

Excessive

delivery of

fine

sediment,

from the

catchmen

t or

artificially

enhanced

bank

erosion,

can

damage

gills,

impair

vision and

cause

siltation of

spawning

areas.

As above. Allis shad use the estuary as a route to their

breeding grounds. Shad grow in coastal waters

and then migrate up estuaries to spawn. There

is one known spawning ground on the Tamar

which is located just below the Gunnislake Weir.

As part of the advice received from the

Environment Agency and Natural England on

the HMNB Devonport plough dredging marine

licence application, March 2015,

MLA/2015/00065, a phased approach to

dredging the main channel was agreed to

mitigate for potential impacts to migratory fish

within the estuary.

As a precautionary measure dredging will be

restricted in the main channel areas during key

migratory windows (April to November). The

restricted area is set as the area of the channel

that lies more than 50m from the wharves. The

50m limit is to ensure that the dredge plume

does not cause any barrier to fish migration.

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

Dredgin

g within

the

estuary

channel

must be

carried

out

between

1st

Decemb

er and

31st

March

inclusive

.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 125: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 125 of 266

Restricting dredging to within the 50m limit will

allow a clear migration path along the western

extent of the channel for migrating species such

as salmon and Allis shad (from evidence

supplied by applicant to support the marine

licence application).

The dredge quantities are in line with previous

maintenance dredging in this area and the

applicant has confirmed that all works in excess

of 50m from the wharves will be undertaken

between December and March, as set out in the

‘Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging

in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site’. These timings minimise

disturbance to the feature. The applicant has

stated that overflowing of the hopper whilst

trailer suction hopper dredging will not occur,

this will further reduce the amount of sediment

entering the water column.

The applicant has also stated they are content to

continue with previous licence conditions that

restrict dredging during the migratory seasons

(April to November). If a positive determination

is made, this condition will be added to the

licence.

This feature has been assessed as

Unfavourable. Based primarily on the barrier to

migration at Gunnislake. This is the only known

breeding site in the UK for Allis Shad and the

barrier continues to prevent the majority of the

Page 126: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 126 of 266

population from reaching their optimal spawning

grounds in freshwater and therefore impacts

shad population, size and distribution, as well as

limiting connectivity between the estuary and the

river for other migratory fish species.

The barrier to migration identified is not related

to the dredging activities. Barriers to migration

will not be increased by dredging activity. The

Tamar is a naturally turbid area with 5000 cubic

metres of sediment (approximately 8300 wet

tonnes) suspended due to tidal action each day,

seasonally (summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic

metres (27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the

estuary, silt content of the water column is at

80% (See Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this feature.

Maintain

natural levels

Prolonged

increases

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 127: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 127 of 266

of turbidity

(eg

suspended

concentration

s of

sediment,

plankton and

other

material) in

areas where

this species

is, or could

be present.

in turbidity

could

affect the

ability of

the

species to

feed and

respire.

Siltation

rate

changes

(High),

including

smotherin

g (depth

of vertical

sediment

overburd

en)

Estuarie

s

Intertidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

intertidal

mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 128: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 128 of 266

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Page 129: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 129 of 266

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

across the

feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

It

isimporta

nt that

these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 130: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 130 of 266

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Intertidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total

extent and

spatial

distribution of

seagrass

beds.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 131: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 131 of 266

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Page 132: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 132 of 266

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to sediment contaminants and

ephemeral opportunistic macroalgae.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

Page 133: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 133 of 266

sea.

Macroalgae overlies the seagrass and prevents

primary production. This is an ephemeral issue

which may be related to elevated residual

nutrient levels. The disturbance of sediments

may cause nutrient enrichment.

However, the Tamar is a naturally turbid area

with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

Activity

around

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 134: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 134 of 266

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

the edge

of a bed

may

result in

changes

to the

sediment

compositi

on and

exposure,

and

erosion

can occur

leaving

rhizomes

uncovere

d and

vulnerabl

e,

reducing

the

extent.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

supported

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 135: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 135 of 266

by the

seagrass.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 136: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 136 of 266

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

Page 137: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 137 of 266

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

Page 138: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 138 of 266

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 139: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 139 of 266

the feature. ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 140: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 140 of 266

functionin

g of the

feature.

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

Page 141: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 141 of 266

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

Page 142: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 142 of 266

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

Sediment

character

is

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 143: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 143 of 266

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 144: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 144 of 266

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

Page 145: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 145 of 266

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

The

distributio

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 146: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 146 of 266

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 147: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 147 of 266

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

Estuaries

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the estuary

to ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increased siltation

rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 148: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 148 of 266

feature. concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

Page 149: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 149 of 266

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~63%), Unfavourable (~2%), Unfavourable:

declining (~27%), Not assessed (~8%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain

sediment

regime and

budget within

the estuary,

including

sediment

sources,

sinks and

movement.

If the

sediment

budget or

sediment

movemen

t is

restricted

this can

cause the

decline

and

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 150: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 150 of 266

erosion,

or

change,

of

habitats.

Maintain the

distribution,

composition

and

character of

substrate

across the

feature (and

each of its

subfeatures).

Substrate

character

is

instrumen

tal in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present

within the

estuary.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Large

shallow

inlets

and

bays

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increases siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 151: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 151 of 266

resilience

of the

feature

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

Page 152: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 152 of 266

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Page 153: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 153 of 266

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

Page 154: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 154 of 266

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As

above.

Page 155: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 155 of 266

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 156: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 156 of 266

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

Page 157: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 157 of 266

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

Page 158: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 158 of 266

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As

above.

Page 159: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 159 of 266

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 160: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 160 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

Page 161: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 161 of 266

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

Page 162: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 162 of 266

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 163: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 163 of 266

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 164: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 164 of 266

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

Page 165: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 165 of 266

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 166: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 166 of 266

subfeature. biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Large

shallow

inlets and

bays

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the large

shallow inlet

and bay to

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

As above. This feature is c4km downstream of the dredge

area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 167: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 167 of 266

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

whilst

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

Page 168: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 168 of 266

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~36%), Unfavourable (~5%), Unfavourable:

declining (~41%), Not assessed (~18%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain Sediment As above. As above. As above. As As

Page 169: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 169 of 266

sediment

regime and

budget within

the large

shallow inlet

and bay,

including

sediment

sources,

sinks, and

movement.

movemen

t, sources

and sinks

within,

and

interactin

g with,

large

shallow

inlets and

bays are

important

to

maintainin

g a

healthy

coastal

system

and

sediment

budget.

above. above.

Maintain the

distribution,

composition

and

character of

substrate

across the

feature (and

each of its

subfeatures).

Substrate

character

is

instrumen

tal in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present

within the

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 170: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 170 of 266

estuary.

Sandba

nks

which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawate

r all the

time

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increases siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 171: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 171 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

Page 172: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 172 of 266

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

Page 173: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 173 of 266

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

It is

important

that these

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 174: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 174 of 266

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 175: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 175 of 266

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

Page 176: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 176 of 266

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

Page 177: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 177 of 266

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain It is As above. As above. As above. As As

Page 178: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 178 of 266

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

above. above.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 179: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 179 of 266

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

Page 180: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 180 of 266

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

Page 181: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 181 of 266

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 182: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 182 of 266

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As

above.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 183: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 183 of 266

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

Page 184: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 184 of 266

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 185: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 185 of 266

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

As above. As above. As above. As above.

As above.

Page 186: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 186 of 266

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

Sandbank

s which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawater

all the

time

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

sandbanks to

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increased siltation

rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 187: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 187 of 266

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

Page 188: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 188 of 266

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~8%), Unfavourable (~9%), Unfavourable:

declining (~83%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 189: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 189 of 266

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Siltation

rate

changes

(Low),

including

smotherin

g (depth

of vertical

sediment

overburd

en)

Estuarie

s

Circalittor

al rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

circalittoral

reef subject

to natural

variation in

sediment

veneer.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c3km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 190: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 190 of 266

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

Page 191: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 191 of 266

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

ve

success,

reducing

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 192: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 192 of 266

larval

recruitme

nt.

Infralittora

l rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

infralittoral

reef subject

to natural

variation in

sediment

veneer.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c0.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 193: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 193 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Page 194: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 194 of 266

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

ve

success,

reducing

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Intertidal

rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

intertidal reef

subject to

natural

variation in

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

As above. This subfeature is c1.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 195: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 195 of 266

sediment

veneer.

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Page 196: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 196 of 266

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

influence

communit

y

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 197: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 197 of 266

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

ve

success,

reducing

larval

recruitme

nt.

Intertidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total

extent and

spatial

distribution of

seagrass

beds.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 198: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 198 of 266

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

Page 199: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 199 of 266

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to sediment contaminants and

ephemeral opportunistic macroalgae.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

Page 200: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 200 of 266

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

Macroalgae overlies the seagrass and prevents

primary production. This is an ephemeral issue

which may be related to elevated residual

nutrient levels. The disturbance of sediments

may cause nutrient enrichment.

However, the Tamar is a naturally turbid area

with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the Activity As above. As above. As above. As As

Page 201: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 201 of 266

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

around

the edge

of a bed

may

result in

changes

to the

sediment

compositi

on and

exposure,

and

erosion

can occur

leaving

rhizomes

uncovere

d and

vulnerabl

e,

reducing

the

extent.

above. above.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 202: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 202 of 266

supported

by the

seagrass.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 203: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 203 of 266

feature. revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

Page 204: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 204 of 266

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

Page 205: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 205 of 266

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 206: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 206 of 266

the feature. ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 207: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 207 of 266

functionin

g of the

feature.

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

Page 208: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 208 of 266

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

Page 209: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 209 of 266

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

Sediment

character

is

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 210: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 210 of 266

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 211: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 211 of 266

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

Page 212: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 212 of 266

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

The

distributio

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 213: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 213 of 266

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 214: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 214 of 266

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

Estuaries

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the estuary

to ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

As above. This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increased siltation

rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 215: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 215 of 266

feature. concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

Page 216: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 216 of 266

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~63%), Unfavourable (~2%), Unfavourable:

declining (~27%), Not assessed (~8%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain

sediment

regime and

budget within

the estuary,

including

sediment

sources,

sinks and

movement.

If the

sediment

budget or

sediment

movemen

t is

restricted

this can

cause the

decline

and

erosion,

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 217: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 217 of 266

or

change,

of

habitats.

Maintain the

distribution,

composition

and

character of

substrate

across the

feature (and

each of its

subfeatures).

Substrate

character

is

instrumen

tal in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present

within the

estuary.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Large

shallow

inlets

and

bays

Circalittor

al rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

circalittoral

reef subject

to natural

variation in

sediment

veneer.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c3km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 218: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 218 of 266

of the

feature.

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

Page 219: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 219 of 266

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 220: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 220 of 266

ve

success,

reducing

larval

recruitme

nt.

Infralittora

l rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

infralittoral

reef subject

to natural

variation in

sediment

veneer.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c0.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 221: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 221 of 266

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

Page 222: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 222 of 266

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

ve

success,

reducing

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Intertidal

rock

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

intertidal reef

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

As above. This subfeature is c1.5km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As

above.

Page 223: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 223 of 266

subject to

natural

variation in

sediment

veneer.

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Page 224: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 224 of 266

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect on this subfeature.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation on

reef

habitats

can

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 225: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 225 of 266

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

affect

reproducti

ve

success,

reducing

larval

recruitme

nt.

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increases siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 226: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 226 of 266

of the

feature

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

Page 227: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 227 of 266

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Page 228: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 228 of 266

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

Page 229: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 229 of 266

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 230: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 230 of 266

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 231: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 231 of 266

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

Page 232: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 232 of 266

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

Page 233: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 233 of 266

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 234: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 234 of 266

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 235: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 235 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

Page 236: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 236 of 266

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

Page 237: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 237 of 266

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 238: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 238 of 266

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 239: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 239 of 266

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

Page 240: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 240 of 266

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 241: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 241 of 266

subfeature. biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Large

shallow

inlets and

bays

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

the large

shallow inlet

and bay to

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

As above. This feature is c4km downstream of the dredge

area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

No. Please see in combination assessment below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No adverse effect on site integrity.

Page 242: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 242 of 266

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

whilst

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

Page 243: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 243 of 266

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~36%), Unfavourable (~5%), Unfavourable:

declining (~41%), Not assessed (~18%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain Sediment As above. As above. As above. As As

Page 244: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 244 of 266

sediment

regime and

budget within

the large

shallow inlet

and bay,

including

sediment

sources,

sinks, and

movement.

movemen

t, sources

and sinks

within,

and

interactin

g with,

large

shallow

inlets and

bays are

important

to

maintainin

g a

healthy

coastal

system

and

sediment

budget.

above. above.

Maintain the

distribution,

composition

and

character of

substrate

across the

feature (and

each of its

subfeatures).

Substrate

character

is

instrumen

tal in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present

within the

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 245: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 245 of 266

estuary.

Subtidal

coarse

sediment

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

coarse

sediment.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This subfeature is c2km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increases siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 246: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 246 of 266

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable due to a poor IQI score

(community composition) however this is based

Page 247: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 247 of 266

on a limited number of sample points. The

assessment is also based on elevated sediment

contaminant levels; this includes elevated

Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc and Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The assessment is based on a limited number of

sample points. The Tamar is a naturally turbid

area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment

(approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended

due to tidal action each day, seasonally

(summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres

(27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary,

silt content of the water column is at 80% (See

Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in

Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European

Marine Site).

Storms can cause in the order of 30,000 cubic

metres to be redistributed within the estuary in a

few days.

Considering the probable daily volumes of

sediment that could be introduced into the

system, it is unlikely that the combined daily

increase will be greater than that of the river’s

natural variation.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

Page 248: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 248 of 266

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

It is

important

that these

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 249: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 249 of 266

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

Subtidal

mixed

sediments

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

mixed

sediment.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature is adjacent to the dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 250: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 250 of 266

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

Page 251: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 251 of 266

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

Page 252: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 252 of 266

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain It is As above. As above. As above. As As

Page 253: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 253 of 266

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

above. above.

Subtidal

mud

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal mud.

A

reduction

in extent

would

alter the

biological

and

physical

functionin

g of the

feature.

As above. This subfeature overlaps the dredge area.

Dredge activities will remove this subfeature.

Disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 254: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 254 of 266

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

Page 255: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 255 of 266

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Unfavourable: Declining as the presence and

spatial distribution of communities has altered

due to the existence and increased prevalence

of Crepidula fornicata (slipper limpet) dominated

biotopes, the fail is also based on sediment

contaminant levels, this includes elevated levels

of Mercury, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Polyaromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs).

The dredge area is in the Tamar and any non-

indigenous species will be transported via

natural processes. No significant pathways

between dredging and positive impacts to

Crepidula fornicata have been identified and so

it is considered that activities will not increase

the spread of this species.

It is difficult to conclude if the main source of

Page 256: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 256 of 266

chemical pollutants within the estuarine

sediments is from historic mining activities or

current activities. However, the sediment to be

dredged has been tested for suitability for

disposal at sea. The samples were analysed for

metals and tins and Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarbons (PAH).

The results of metals and tins analysis show

elevated levels of (above Cefas Action Level

one) for all determinants. Results above Cefas

Action Level one do not preclude the material

from disposal at sea as background levels of

metals and tins in the south west region are

particularly high. The results of the PAH analysis

show elevated levels of (above Cefas Action

Level one) for all determinants and total

hydrocarbons. However, these levels are within

those expected from the Plymouth area and

would not preclude the material from disposal at

sea.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 257: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 257 of 266

es

present.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Subtidal

seagrass

beds

Maintain the

total extent of

seagrass

beds at 34.6

ha, and

spatial

distribution

as defined on

the map.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

As above. This subfeature is c4km downstream of the

dredge area.

There is no overlap and so no direct impacts,

but disturbance of sediment could cause an

increased siltation rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

As above. No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

As above.

Page 258: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 258 of 266

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

Page 259: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 259 of 266

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This subfeature has been assessed as

Favourable.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this subfeature.

Maintain the

area of

habitat which

is likely to

support the

subfeature.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 260: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 260 of 266

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the

subfeature.

Sediment

compositi

on is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

supported

by the

seagrass.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain the

natural rate

of sediment

deposition.

Sediment

ation can

influence

communit

y

compositi

on, alter

species

growth

rates and

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Page 261: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 261 of 266

potentially

impact

reproducti

ve

success

by

affecting

larval

recruitme

nt.

Sandbank

s which

are

slightly

covered

by

seawater

all the

time

(feature)

Maintain the

total extent

and spatial

distribution of

subtidal

sandbanks to

ensure no

loss of

integrity,

while

allowing for

natural

change and

succession.

The

distributio

n will

influence

the

compone

nt

communiti

es

present,

and also

help

increase

the health

and

resilience

of the

feature.

This project

is not

necessary

for the

manageme

nt of the

site or

feature.

There are

potential

impacts on

the feature

from the

project.

This feature overlaps the dredge area. Dredge

activities will remove this feature. Disturbance of

sediment could cause an increased siltation

rate.

The ‘Baseline Document for Maintenance

Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site’ assessed dredging

activities from this location relevant to the

integrity of the Plymouth Sound and Estuaries

European Marine Site (EMS). The 2010 report,

revised in 2011, found that the influence of

maintenance dredging activity on the marine

environment, and associated habitats and

species was likely to be negligible because of

the lack of any impact of dredging on the wider

coastal processes, outside of the estuary. It was

concluded that the level of maintenance

dredging practices at the time were sustainable

and were not having an adverse effect on the

features of the SAC.

The report assessed an average of 118,531 wet

No. Please

see in

combinati

on

assessme

nt below.

No

adverse

effects

identifie

d.

No

adverse

effect on

site

integrity.

Page 262: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 262 of 266

tonnes per annum over a 25 year period of

maintenance dredging from the Naval Dockyard.

The proposed volume for this maintenance

campaign is 92,000 wet tonnes, within the

envelope of assessment, and the proposed

methodology remains the same.

Natural England has stated that the dredge

quantities are thought to be generally in line with

previous maintenance dredging in this area and

this has been confirmed by the MMO.

The dredging methodology includes both trailer

suction hopper dredging and plough dredging.

Real time monitoring buoy data

(MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application –

Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge

Assessment) indicated that any changes in

turbidity associated with plough dredging

operations are generally within the levels of

natural variation associated with this part of the

estuary. As greater increases in turbidity, and

any subsequent changes to water clarity,

dissolved oxygen levels, nutrient and organic

enrichment and siltation rates, are expected

from plough dredging due to the nature of the

activity, trailer suction hopper dredging is also

expected to be within acceptable limits for

changes to turbidity.

Other small scale grab and submersible pump

dredging methods are associated with the

application. The quantity of material dredged via

Page 263: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 263 of 266

these methods is particularly low and it is

expected that the sediment disturbance

associated with these methods to be similar to

the plough dredger.

This feature has been assessed as: Favourable

(~8%), Unfavourable (~9%), Unfavourable:

declining (~83%).

Condition assessments of the relevant

subfeatures have been discussed the in sections

above.

As such the MMO considers that dredging will

not cause a significant effect from this pressure

on this feature.

Maintain the

existing

distribution of

sediment

composition

types across

the feature.

Sediment

character

is

important

in

determini

ng the

biological

communiti

es

present.

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As above.

Maintain

sediment

transport

pathways to

and from the

feature to

It is

important

that these

hydrodyn

amic and

sediment

As above. As above. As above. As

above.

As

above.

Page 264: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 264 of 266

ensure

replenishmen

t of habitats

which are

reliant on the

sediment

supply.

ary

processes

persist

and are

allowed to

change in

response

to

environm

ental

conditions

without

hindrance

Page 265: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 265 of 266

In combination impacts of other known or potential activities

The MMO must assess potential in combination effects with other plans or projects. The following plans or projects have been identified as potential sources of in combination impacts:

Thanckes Oil Fuel Depot Loading Facility and Tank Farm Fire Fighting Upgrade (MLA/2015/00215);

Plymouth Yacht Haven Maintenance Dredging (MLA/2016/00334);

Yacht Haven Quay Maintenance Dredging (MLA/2016/00335);

Cremyll View Mount Edgcumbe Sea Wall Repair (MLA/2016/00389); and

Stonehouse Bridge Tidal Gates Refurbishments (MLA/2016/00410);

Turnchapel Wharf Capital Dredge (MLA/2017/00052);

Devonport Plough Dredge (MLA/2017/00049). The MMO is not aware of any other projects or plans within the vicinity of Tamar Estuary and the local European sites in proximity of the dredge area. The current licence for Devonport maintenance dredge will expire in March 2017. The proposed start date for the Thanckes Oil Fuel Depot Loading Facility and Tank Farm Fire Fighting Upgrade licence application (MLA/2015/00215) is the 1 September 2017. Due to the temporary nature of the dredging impacts there will be no overlap between activities, should a positive determination be made, and so no further assessment of in combination effects of the project and MLA/2015/00215 is required. There is potential for overlap between the other projects and so in combination effects have been assessed. However, it should be noted that it is unlikely that all activities will overlap to the degree assessed. Potential impacts of the dredging activity from this application with potential activities in the River Plym will not form further part of this assessment. This is based on two factors:

The distance of c7.6km between the two sites; and

The direction of water flow from Plymouth Sound.

As such there is no significant pathway for activities at Devonport and the River Plym to impact in combination on the features of the site. These relevant marine licence applications which therefore do not require further in combination assessment are Yacht Haven Quay (MLA/2016/00335), Plymouth Yacht Haven (MLA/2016/00334) and Turnchapel Wharf (MLA/2017/00052). Furthermore, there is the potential for increased suspended sediment levels and associated pressures due to plough dredge activities for Devonport (MLA/2017/00049).

Page 266: Record of Appropriate Assessment Regulation 61 of the

Page 266 of 266

Real time monitoring buoy data (MLA/2015/00336 marine licence application – Appendix C – Technical Note Plough Dredge Assessment) indicated that any changes in turbidity associated with plough dredging operations are generally within the levels of natural variation associated with this part of the estuary. The Tamar is a naturally turbid area with 5000 cubic metres of sediment (approximately 8300 wet tonnes) suspended due to tidal action each day, seasonally (summer/winter) this is 164000 cubic metres (27300 wet tonnes). At the mouth of the estuary, silt content of the water column is at 80% (See Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging in Plymouth Sound and Estuaries European Marine Site). Considering the probable daily volumes of sediment that could be introduced into the system, it is unlikely that the combined daily increase will be greater than that of the rivers natural variation. The Cremyll View Mount Edgcumbe Sea Wall Repair (MLA/2016/00389) and Stonehouse Bridge Tidal Gates Refurbishments (MLA/2016/00410) marine licence applications are both minor works a further c3km downstream of HMNB Devonport. Therefore, due to the distance from these features, there is no significant pathway for activities at Devonport.

Proposed Mitigation

Mitigation embedded within the application has been taken into account prior to the Stage

1 Assessment. This section outlines the mitigation that the MMO consider necessary to

ensure that the conservation objectives of this site will not be hindered.

No dredging in the main river channel between the 1st April until 31st November.

Conclusion

Will the plan or project cause an adverse effect on site integrity (long term or short

term)?

With having regard to best available evidence and through consultation with the MMO’s

advisors, the MMO conclude that, providing the above mitigation measures are secured,

there is no significant risk of the plan or project causing an adverse effect on site integrity

for Plymouth Sound and Estuaries SAC.

References

Black and Veatch. (2010). Baseline Document for Maintenance. Debut in partnership with

Defence Estates.

Natural England (2016). Natural England Condition Assessment: Plymouth Sound and

Estuaries Special Area of Conservation.