Upload
ngokhanh
View
242
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
315
ISSN: 0974 - 0376
KEYWORDS
Proceedings of International Conference on
Anthropogenic Impact on Environment & Conservation Strategy
(ICAIECS - 2012)
November 02 - 04, 2012, Ranchi,
organized by
Department of Zoology, Ranchi University, Ranchi
&
Departments of Zoology and Botany,
St. Xavier’s College, Ranchi
in association with
National Environmentalists Association, Indiawww.neaindia.org
NSave Nature to Survive
: Special issue, Vol. 1:
www.theecoscan.inAN INTERNATIONAL QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rajat Mohan et al.
Reclamation
Sodic soil
Mulberry
Tolerant
Extension
315 - 320: 2012
RECLAMATION OF SODIC SOILS (PROBLEMATIC SOILS) THROUGH
MULBERRY PLANTATION
316
RAJAT MOHAN*, PRAMOD KUMAR1, RAJESH KHARE, MEERA VERMA1, O. P. SINGH 2 K. A. SAHAF3 AND
M. A. KHAN 3
Regional Sericultural Research Station, C. S. B. Complex, Central Silk Board, Miran Sahib, Jammu - 181 1011Research Extension Section, Gonda – 271 001, U.P.
2DOS, Sitapur – 261 001, U.P.3CSR and TI, Central Silk Board, Govt of India, Pampore - 192 121, Sri Nagar,
E-mail: [email protected]
*Corresponding author
NSave Nature to Survive QUARTERLY
INTRODUCTION
Sericulture in north India is a subsidiary crop. Farmers in north western India are
not willing to involve their land for mulberry plantation due to limited crops in this
region as the farmers mostly belong to below poverty line and do not have largeland holdings. Whatever land they have they use it for growing seasonal cash
crops. There are only two sericulture crops, one in spring and one in autumn. Each
crop was of 25 days duration and hence just for 50 days farmers were not willing
to plant mulberry in their one acre or two acre land holding. With this back drop it
was known that lakhs of hectares of land were available as waste land as they are
salt affected and were not used for agriculture. If this available land could be made
to be utilized for sericulture purposes it may help the farmers as well as the
environment.In Uttar Pradesh 1.25 million hectares of area are salt affected. Areas
falling in Lucknow, Aligarh, Azamgarh, Bareilly, Etah, Etawa, Ghaziabad, Hardoi,Sultanpur,Pratapgarh, Unnao, Kanpur, Meerut and Rae - bareilly are mainlyaffected by sodicity. Such land are of less use so far as agriculture is concerned.These available waste lands with moderate alkalinity were the target to be utilizedfor mulberry plantation. (Agar, 2009; Aslam, 2011). Salinization and alkalinizationof the soil are serious impediments in obtaining higher crop yields in sizeable land
area of the country. According to an estimate more than 7 million hectares of
otherwise productive land of the country have virtually gone out of cultivation.
Country’s most fertile belt in Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Bihar with an area of
about 2.4 million hectares is affected with sodicity problem. (Afridi et al.,
1998).These land can be exploited,if salt tolerant mulberry varieties are screened.
(Simiyan and Vivekananda, 1992; Agastian and Vivekanandan 1997; Agastian et
al., 1997).
The techniques other than tree plantation are costly and the BPL farmer may not be
able to spend the amount required. The most recommended method to meet the
challenge had been correction of the soil with Gypsum etc but large scale correction/
reclamation involves huge expenditure which is out of reach of the BPL farmers.
(Bose et al., 1992). Besides, sericulture, one of the main objectives of the study is to
get such soil reclamation through mulberry plantation. Hence it was felt that there
was need to screen suitable salt tolerant mulberry varieties which may give some
breakthrough in this direction. It is known from literature that Salt tolerant trees
when planted either in association or as sole plantations reclaim the sodic soils
over a considerable period of time. (Jain et al., 1992; Khan et al., 1995 and Khan,
2003). The reduction in soil pH thus decreases EC in due course, increases organic
carbon, improves water infiltration rates and the canopy lowers the air temperature.
The peak runoff volume and peak runoff rate from alkali catchments also reduces
significantly with growth of such tree species (Downtown, 1984, Basavaraja et al.,
2010;Dan, 2010). Few mulberry genotypes were identified as tolerant to alkalinity
and are in use in different areas. Though these genotypes show wider adaptability
In our country enormous land is subjected to
various types of degradation out of which
major area is affected by sodicity and alkalinity.
The sodicity of soil is developed by
accumulation of excessive salt in the upper
surface of soil because of impermeable hard
pan of calcium carbonate at a depth of 60 cm
to 1.2m. Under such category of soils the
survival of crop was very difficult. The
rehabilitation of sodic soils, through chemical
and mechanical means was very costly and is
beyond the reach of Indian farmers. Under
such soil conditions few trees and bushes of
mulberry were tolerant to some moderate
extremes of such soil but it was necessary to
screen such varieties. An experiment was taken
up to screen mulberry varieties at soils of pH
between 9-9.90 with moderate EC of 0.5 to
50 and Na+ ion concentration of 4-8%. The
screening of eight varieties in such soil gave
two varieties viz AR-12 and AR-14 suitable
for plantation in such soil. The leaf yield
increased from about 100 g/plant initially
increased to 1000g /plant after about 8-10
years and reclaimed the soil to a greater extent
by reducing soil pH, EC and increasing
available P, K and organic carbon. Further,
these varieties as part of extension were
planted at farmer’s level and in DOS farm of
U.P. It was found that the survival was between
60-70 % at farmer’s level at pH 8.7-9.0 and
the same was between 70% in DOS farm at 9-
9.5 pH of soil. This will not only help
sericulture farmers to get income from cocoon
crop but will be a great contribution for
environment as in a span of time such plantation
will convert uncultivable land into cultivable
land and reclamation will completely
rehabilitate the soil.
ABSTRACT
317
the yield potential may not be the same in all areas. The
package of practices for different genotypes may differ from
one part of the country to the other. The suitability of different
genotypes in such soils of Uttar Pradesh has not been studied
so far. As already stated above reclamation of land on large
scale is not possible, hence it was felt necessary to identify/
screen genotypes which can survive on these lands and were
suitable for the regional requirement and can give benefit to
the silk industry. This will help in providing employment to
the BPL families by adoption of sericulture as subsidiary
occupation. The management of soil thus becomes easier
and economic. Hence the objective of the study was to screen
such genotypes which may thrive in such conditions and in
the process of their growth and through the intercultural
practices may lower the pH value and reclaim the soil partially.
Further in a span of few years it is likely that little higher organic
inputs, application of FYM and copious irrigation may reclaim
the soil and the land completely. (Jain et al., 1992 and Garg,
2002).After the screening of varieties, small efforts were also
made to take it to the farmers as part of transfer of technology.
Besides creation of one more germplasm of screened
genotypes at state govt farm of UP for their future multiplication
and plantation at farmers level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The suitability of different genotypes for high pH soil was
studied at BBAU, Lucknow (pH 9.0-9.90) with low electrical
conductivity (ECdsm-1, 0.384-0.554). Eight mulberry
Genotypes viz S-146, S-13, TR-10,S-1,S-1635, BR-2, AR-12
and AR-14 were grown at BBA University Lucknow in
randomized block design in the year 2000-01. All normal
recommended inputs were given as per recommendations
but no correction to the soil was done.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
It was found that AR-12, AR-14 and BR-2 were comparatively
tolerant in comparison to other genotypes. The comparative
performance of the genotypes grown in high pH soil showed
reduction in yield in initial years but the thriving and
sustenance paved the way for plantation of these genotypes in
sodic soil. The highest leaf yield was 11.96 t/h in AR-12 (11.96
t/h), AR-12 (10.62 t/h), BR-2(9.18 t/h), S-1635(7.99 t/h), S-146
(7.53 t/h), S-1 (6.64 t/h) TR-10(6.33 t/h), S-13(5.86 t/h) in one
harvest after eight years which gets double or triple in two and
three harvests. The leaf yield was reduced initially in all the
genotypes grown in high pH soil in earlier years in comparison
to the yield in normal soils but has now reached almost at par
to the production of leaves in normal soil (yield in one harvest
800-1000g/plant or 9-10 t/h). The per plant leaf yield increased
from 100g/plant to appx 1000g/plant in a span of 8 years. This
shows that the impact of trees/plants of mulberry and its cultural
operations have affected the soil positively. The plantation in
sodic soil was regularly irrigated but no soil correction was
done. The genotypes will serve as gene pool for further studies.
AR-14, AR-12 and BR-2 are recommended for plantation at
high pH and low electrical conductivity range (pH: 9-9.90 and
EC: 0.4-0.5 EC-dsm. The survival % after plantation was very
low in all the genotypes (18-34%) but the regular gap fillings
could lead to 100 % establishment of plantation. The back up
of nursery is a must for such plantation in Usar lands. The
plantation also serves as tolerant stock of Germplasm for future
multiplication and plantation. (Jain et al., 1992, Khan et al.,
1995, Garg, 2002 and Khalid et al., 2009). The main objective
of the study was to find out the system that operates with the
high pH resistant mulberry varieties and to study the variation
of such system in different genotypes of mulberry and their
role in soil rehabilitation (Mohammad and Szabolcs, 1999;
Niazi et al., 1992; Marcar, 2004 and Kiran et al., 2009). The
different response of different mulberry varieties under salinity
stress as observed through different parameters offers the
opportunity to identify salt tolerant genotypes in mulberry (Niazi
et al., 1992 and Prakash et al., 1998). Salt tolerance of a crop
is a kind of rating based on genotype response to increasing
levels of salinity manifested through reduction in survival, yield
and yield attributing traits. The variety AR-12 exhibited highest
survival percentages at high pH in the present study showing
highest salt tolerance followed by AR-14 and BR-2 in
comparison to S-146 and other varieties based on survival
and leaf yield. Table 1 (Prakash et al., 1998 and Ramanjulu, et
al., 1994a, 1994b). Another parameter fruit yield/ plant were
also undertatken and it was found that highest fruit yield was
recorded in BR-2 (0.75kg/plant) followed by S-13 (0.25 kg)
and S-146 ( 0.30kg/Plant). The fruits of BR-2 genotype which
were qualitatively and quantitatively better, were utilized to
produce Squash and resham chyavan/Jam for value addition.
The value addition details are presented below:
Utilization of fruits
Fruits of Br-2 variety are recommended for utilization
The fruits after fermentation may be used affording intoxicating
beverages. The fruit juice is also used for reducing high fever.
This is the fast treatment normally given to a patient with
symptoms of fever during endemic malaria. It has the property
S. No. Plots pH EC dsm-1 Na++ mL/100g
1 BBAU 9.65 0.423 5.36
2*** BBAU 9.90 0.554 8.28
3 BBAU 9.00 0.384 6.80
4 BBAU 9.75 0.386 5.95
Table1: Analytical data of soil samples of BBA University Lucknow
in the year 2000
Experimental site of screening of mulberry genotype
*** Experimental plot
The soil characteristics of the high pH soil selected for the trial
undertaken is Table 1.
The experimental design of experiment conducted at pH9.90:
Genotype: 08 (S-13, TR-10, S-1635, S-I & S-146,BR-
2, AR-12, AR-14)
Spacing: 3‘ X 3‘
Replication: 05
Single plot size: 15‘ X 15‘
No of plants/Plot: 25
Design: Randomized Block Design
The varieties mentioned under the experiment were planted
as per the design. The plantation was done in Jan 2000.
Observations on survival, leaf yield, fruit yield were taken.
Fruits were utilized to find out the prospects of value addition
through production of squash and resham chyavan (a new
product).
RECLAMATION OF SODIC SOILS
318
RAJAT MOHAN et al.,
for preventing diarrhea and cold. Syrups and recipes prepared
from fruits of Morus Alba are used against hyperlipemia,
constipation and insomnia and anti aging. Decoction prepared
from fruit is used against cerebral arteriosclerosis, central
retinisis and nasopharyngial cancer. However, the fruits can
be easily used to prepare squash and jams which can fetch
substantive income for the farmer in addition to income from
silkworm cocoon crops. A small trial was done, the details of
which are as under.
The squash and resham chyavan/jam prepared from the fruits
collected was of standard quality which can fetch approx Rs
100/L of squash and Rs 100/kg of resham chyavan jam. The
residue after preparation of squash was used to prepare resham
chyavan. A simple assessment was made to find out the
quantitative requirement of fruits for sample production of
squash and resham chyavan which may form the basis for
commercial production of these. The details are given below:
Per kg economics
Fruitsutilised: 01.0kg
Juice extracted from the above: 0.5 L
Squash prepared : 1.5 L
Pulp balance after the above: 0.5 kg
Resham chyavan prepared from the pulp: 0.5 kg
This will fetch Rs 200/kg of fruits; if pure Jam is prepared it will
produce 2kg of Jam from 2kg of fruits fetching Rs 200/kg @ Rs
100/kg of Jam. Besides this, a minimum of one basket can be
prepared from ten year old mulberry tree fetching Rs 30-50/
basket. The variety BR-2 was found to be relatively tolerant
and almost at par with AR-14 and AR-12 and could be
cultivated in high pH soils and also may be utilized in future
breeding programs for developing varieties tolerant to salinity.
BR-2(10-15% population with AR-12 and AR-14) is
recommended for plantation at farmers level as it yields
optimum leaf yield with qualitative production of fruits. The
leaves can be utilized to rear silkworms in spring, summer
and autumn seasons to produce 100-150kg of cocoon worth
Rs 10,000-15000 at the minimum and fruits of the variety can
be utilized to produce squash and Resham Chyavan worth Rs
200/ kg at the minimum. However, proper marketing system
is required to be established for sale of squash and Resham
chyavan. In any case the farmer at least can produce the Jam
and Squash for its own family requirement. Besides above,
further research on different parts of mulberry i.e. fruits to
roots of mulberry are recommended to exploit the antioxidant
properties of mulberry to utilize medicinal properties of the
plant. Another important aspect of the mulberry plantation in
high pH soils is that the mulberry may not flourish in such
soils as it flourishes in normal soils but it definitely will thrive
as it has been found in the experiment. Such plantations in
due course will convert such uncultivable land into fertile
lands. The plantation at BBAU University, Lucknow as on
date after ten years of plantation flourishes luxuriantly and the
pH has been lowered due to these plantations (Table 2). The
pH of the experimental site after the trial showed reduction in
ten years (Table 2). The reduction in soil pH thus decreases
EC in due course, increases organic carbon, improves water
infiltration rates and the canopy of mulberry lowers the air
temperature. The peak runoff volume and peak runoff rate
from alkali catchments also reduces significantly with growth
Name of mulberry Chemical properties
tree species SoilpH Electrical conductivity Organic Available P Available K
(mmhos) carbon(%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha)
2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
S1 9.90 9.4 0.554 0.25 0.12 0.55 6.0 12.0 85.0 175
AR14 9.90 8.2 0.554 0.20 0.12 0.71 6.0 14.4 85.0 214
S1635 9.90 9.2 0.554 0.25 0.12 0.45 6.0 9.0 85.0 125
S146 9.90 9.3 0.554 0.25 0.12 0.58 6.0 10.8 85.0 175
BR-2 9.90 8.4 0.554 0.20 0.12 0.75 6.0 11.0 85.0 220
AR-12 9.90 8.3 0.554 0.20 0.12 0.76 6.0 13.8 85.0 225
TR-10 9.90 9.2 0.554 0.25 0.12 0.67 6.0 10.0 85.0 160
S-13 9.90 8.50 0.554 0.25 0.12 0.55 6.0 10.4 85.0 165
Table 2: Changes in soil after ten years of plantation
Genotypes/Years Survival Leaf Yield g/plant
2003 2003 2006 2009
AR-12 34.00 119.66 394.33 997.33
AR-14 26.00 111.66 367.33 885.66
BR-2 23.00 96.33 333.33 765.33
S-1635 24.00 107.66 313.33 666.66
S-146 21.33 96.00 329.666 628.00
S-1 19.33 86.66 312.00 554.00
TR-10 18.66 103.33 293.66 528.00
S-13 25.33 109.00 268.00 488.66
CD 5% 1.75 3.24 6.67 7.00
Table 3: Survival and leaf yield data in high pH soil 2003-2009 Year
of plantation: 2000
Note: Regular gap fillings after 2003 led to 100 % establishment of its germplasm by 2010
Figure 1 to 3: (1) Year 2000 Initial Plantation pH 9.90; (2) Same
Plantation Year 2009; (3) Full view: year 2008
1(a)
1(b)
2
3
319
of such plant species in high pH soils. (Simiyan and
Vivekananda, 1992). The increase in organic matter, available
P and K of soil by trees have been reported by earlier workers
(Khan et al., 2003) Similar effect of tree species on soil pH and
EC were reported by Singh (1995) and Singh et al. (1997). Salt
tolerant trees and grasses when planted either in association
or as sole plantations reclaim the sodic soils over a considerable
period of time. The mechanism for sodic soil reclamation by
trees involves, (a) dissolution of native calcium carbonate
present in precipitated form in sodic soils by the biological
activity of tree, grass roots, (b) addition of leaf litter and turn
over of old roots which increase organic carbon in the soil, (c)
penetration of water into the otherwise impermeable soil
through the holes created by the decayed roots which facilitates
reaction with CO2 evolved from root respiration and thus
producing carbonic acid. This acid, though weak in reaction
initiates the process of dissolution of native CaCO3. The free
Ca in the soil solution available through this reaction replaces
the Na ions on the exchange complex and (d) initiation of
biological activity in the soil due to improved organic matter
contents, moisture and fertility regime. The degree of
reclamation depends upon the kind of tree species, planting
density, the adopted management practices and fencing
provided to the plantation to check encroachment by humans
and animals. Prosopis juliflora, Dalbergia sissoo and
Eucalyptus tereticornis plantations on sodic soil and their
tolerance of sodicity were studied by other workers and they
proved that these tree species were effective in bringing about
improvement in the saturated soil paste extract properties as
reflected by the reduced sodicity and changes in cation and
anion concentration of the soil. (Simiyan and
Vivekananda,1992; Ramanujulu et al., 1994a, b; Rana et al.,
2007, Prakash and Hasan, 2010). Garg, (2002) and Khan et
al. (2003) showed similar results by the adoption of agroforestry
system the soil pH and EC was decreased after eight years of
experimentation. The soil organic carbon, available
phosphorus, available potash was also increased. Among the
tree species tested, Acacia nilotica, Albizia procera, Leucaena
leucocephala, Azadirachta indica and Eucalyptus hybridswere found most suitable tree species for permanent
rehabilitation of sodic soils and to maintain friendly eco-
system. Nutrient return to the soil through litter fall under certain
tree plantations on sodic wastelands in northern India Winter
season reflected maximum leaf and total aboveground litter
fall as studied by Rana et al. (2007). The annual return of
major nutrients (NPK) was observed by him. Foliage accounted
for most of the nutrients (67-92%) returned through litter fall.
All the plantations studied were generally more efficient in N
and K nutrient use than certain other plantations. (Singh et al.,
1994; Singh, 1995; Singh and Garg, 2007).
Transfer of technology
The trial of AR-12 and AR-14 was taken at farmers level in
village Sadulla Nagar near Lucknow in the year 2008 and
survival in July 2010 was between 60-70 % at pH 8.7-9.00. It
was also planted in DOS UP farm at Sitapur (pH: 9.5 and EC:
0.7 to 1.0) in July 2009 and the survival was 70% till June
2010. Thus it is evident that these varieties can reclaim the soil
in a span of 5-10 years and will not only provide employment
to sericulture farmers but will also convert the unfertile land
into cultivable land. (Jain et al., 1992 and Bose et al., 1992).
It is recommended that soil with the characteristic of pH 9-
9.90, EC 0.1-0.5 and Na+ ion concentration 4-8 can be
Genotypes/Years Leaf yield t/ha in one harvest
2003 2006 2009
AR-12 1.43 4.73 11.96
AR-14 1.39 4.40 10.62
BR-2 1.15 3.99 9.18
S-1635 1.29 3.75 7.99
S-146 1.15 3.95 7.53
S-1 1.03 3.74 6.64
TR-10 1.23 3.52 6.33
S-13 1.30 3.21 5.86
Table 4: Leaf yield increase in tons/ha in a span of 8 years in one
harvest at 9.90pH. Year of plantation: 2000 Spacing: 3x3 feet
Note: The leaf yield of these varieties was 400-500g/plant (4-6t/h) after three years , 500-800 g/plant (6-9 t/h) after six years and 800-1200 g/plant (9-14 t/ha) after nine years in one
harvest with the same spacing of 3x3 feet.
RECLAMATION OF SODIC SOILS
4
6
5
7
Figure 4: (4) Variety Ar-12 Year 2008 (5) Same plantation in 2010
after pruning (6) Same plantation in 2011 after sproutes appear in
Feb 2011; (7) Same plantation in Feb 2011: larger view
8
10 (a)
9
10 (b)
Figure 8: (8) State Govt. UP Farm: Raising Germplasm at pH: 9-9.5:
Year 2011 Feb; (9) Farmers Plantation Year 2008; (10) Fruiting vari-
ety BR-2
320
permanently rehabilitated by the adoption of tree/bush
plantation of mulberry varieties AR-12 and AR-14 and BR-2.
REFERENCES
Afridi, M. M., Quader, A. and Dwivedi, R. S. 1998. Effect of salinity
and sodicity on growth and ionic composition of Oryza sativa and
Diplachne Fusca. L. Ind. Bot. Soc. 67: 166-182.
Agar, J. C. 2009. Opportunities for alternate land uses in salty and
water scarcity areas. Intl. J. Eco. Environ. Sci. 35(1): 53-66.
Agastian, S. T. P. and Vivekanandan, M. 1997. Rooting potential of
mulberry genotypes in coastal saline areas. Sericologia. 37: 521-523.
Agastian, S. T. P., Dorcus, D. and Vivekanandan, M. 1997. Effect of
induced salt stress on growth and uptake of mineral nutrients in
mulberry (Morus alba). Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 67: 469-472.
Aslam, Z. 2011. Revegetation for salinity and Environmental
management in Pakistan, Nuclear institute for agriculture and biology
(niab), Faisalabad, Pakistan, Pakistan atomic energy commission,
Report on net/web. 1-12
Basavaraja, P. K., Sharma, S. D., Dhananjaya, B. N. and Badrinath,
M. S. 2010. Acacia nilotica: A tree species for amelioration of sodic
soils in Central dry zone of Karnataka, India.19th World Congress of
Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World.1 - 6 August, 2010,
Brisbane, Australia. Published on DVD. 73-76.
Bose, P. C., Majumdar, S. K. and Dutta, R. K. 1992. Effect of
amendments on chemical properties of alkali soil of mulberry garden
and its yield. Ind. J. Seric. 29(2): 279-281.
Dan, O. 2010. Technical Note: Plants for sodic to saline conditions.
USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service, Boise, Idaho salt lake
City, Utah TN Plant material. 9:1-10
Downtown, W. J. S. 1984. Salt tolerance of food crops: Prospective
for improvements. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1: 183-
201.
Garg, V. K. 2002. Sustainable Rehabilitation of sodic soils through
biological means. Proceedings of 12th ISCO Conference Beijing. 49-
155.
Jain, A. K., Sarkar, A. and Bajpai, A. K. 1992. Screening of tolerance
to salinity & alkalinity in mulberry through meristem culture. Ind.
Nat. Conf. Mulb. Seric.Res. CSR and TI Mysore. p. 14.
Khan, 2003. Studies on Sodic Soils (Problematic Soils). Rehabilitation
Through Agroforestry System for Central Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh,
India,Paper presented in XII world fotrestry conference 2003, Quebec
City, Canada
Khan, S. A., Yadav, V. K. and Shukla, I. N. 1995. Screening of tree
species in relation to crop and higher biomass production under
central U. P. Proceedings of seminar on agroforestry for higher biomass
production organized by NRCAF: 24-25.
Khalid, M., Sarwar, G., Hussain, N., Schmeisky, H. and Muhammad,
S. 2009. Effect of Soil Salinity and Sodicity on Growth parameters of
Acacia Ampliceps. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 22(3-4): 132-139
Kiran, R. K., Miti, R. and Pal, A. 2009. Reclaiming Degraded Land in
India Through the Cultivation of Medicinal Plants. Botany Res. Inter.
2(3): 174-181.
Marcar, N. E. 2004. Tree species and reclamation. Forests and Forests
Plants. II: 1-13.
Mohammad, P. and Szabolcs, I. 1999. Soil Salinity as particular
plant/crop stress factors. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Second
Edition.1-15.
Niazi, M. L., Mahmood, K., Mujtaba, S. M. and Malik, K. A. 1992.
Salinity tolerance in different cultivars of barley (Hardeum vulgare
L.). Biologia Plantarum. 34: 465-469.
Prakash, B. G., Bongale, U.D. and Dandin, S. B. 1998. Screening of
mulberry germplasm accessions for salt tolerance. Sericologia. 38:
367-372.
Prakash, J. and Hasan, S. 2010. Reclamation of sodic soil in North
India through Acacia nilotica and Dalbergia sissoo. J. Nat. Sci. Bio.
Med. 2(3):132-134.
Rana, B. S., Saxena, A. K., Rao, O. P. and Singh, B. P. 2007. Nutrient
return to the soil through litterfall under certain tree plantations on
sodic wastelands in northern india. J. of Trop. Forest Sci. pp.34-42.
Ramanujulu, S., Veeranjaneyulu, K. and Sudhakar, C. 1994b. Sprouting
and rooting of mulberry Morus alba L. var. Mysore local cutting
under NaCI salinity. Ind. J. Seric. 33: 86-88.
Ramanjulu, S., Veeranjaneyulu, K. and Sudhakar, C. 1994a. Relative
tolerance of certain mulberry (Morus alba L) varieties to Nacl salinity.
Sericologia. 34(4): 695-703.
Simiyan, T. A. P. and Vivekananda, M. 1992. Screening of mulberry
varieties for saline tolernce. Proceedings of Int. Conf. Mulb. Seric.
Res. CSR and TI Mysore. p. 17.
Singh, G. 1995. An agroforestry practices for the development of salt
lands using Prosopis juliflora and Leptochlova fusca. Agrofor. Syst.
29: 61-75.
Singh, G., Singh, N. T. and Abrol, I. P. 1997. Agroforestry techniques
for the rehabilitation of salt affected soils of India. Land Degr. Rehabil.
5: 223-242.
Singh, B. and Garg, V. K. 2007. Phytoremediation of a sodic forest
ecosystem:Plant community response to restoration process. Not.
Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 35(1): 77-85.
RAJAT MOHAN et al.,