Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IASA 86TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW
Recent Investment Accounting and Reporting Updates
Session 103
Learning Objectives
Review recent guidance updates and how these changes
will impact your investment reporting
Address current regulatory topics being discussed that
relate to investment accounting
Provide a guideline for best practices to ensure that you
keep current with changes in accounting guidance
Presenters
Tip Tipton, CPA, FLMIFinancial Analyst – Accounting Policy
Thrivent Financial
• Coordinates GAAP and STAT
accounting implementations
• Analyzes reporting processes for
efficiency and improvement
• Maintains accounting policy library
• Over 20 years experience with
investment accounting and reporting
• IASA National and Chapter volunteer
• ACLI Accounting Committee member
Zach Brown, CPAInsurance Services Product Owner
Clearwater Analytics
• Manages cross-functional teams for
product enhancements
• Liaison between internal and external
stakeholders
• Communicates product benefits and
features
• Market expert for product
implementation of new asset classes
Agenda
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
Short-term investment part of a working capital finance program
Initially presented to VOS for approval as an admitted asset in 2011
New categories were added to Schedule BA
WCFI can now be an admitted asset for 2014 reporting
New footnotes were added for disclosure purposes
Higher rate of return than traditional short-terms with only a slight
increase in the RBC risk factor
High SVO filing fees
Working Capital Finance Investments
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
SAPWG 2013-10
Note 5I(1)
Note 5I(2)
Gross Asset CY Non-Admitted Asset CY Net Admitted Asset CY
a) WCFI Designation 1
b) WCFI Designation 2
c) WCFI Designation 3
d) WCFI Designation 4
e) WCFI Designation 5
f) WCFI Designation 6
g) Total
Working Capital Finance Investments
Book/Adjusted
Carrying Value
a) Up to 180 Days
b) 181 days to 365 Days
c) Total
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
SAPWG 2013-10
Global reference code for an entity that engages in a financial
transaction
Added electronic column – effective Q1 2013
Improve identification and evaluation of
counterparties and issuer risk
Ability to aggregate exposures to other entities
Decrease company’s overall operational risks
Legal Entity Identifier
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
2012-30 BWG
WHAT
WHY
Not fully operational
CICIs (or pre-LEIs) can be reported on Schedule D
Transitioning many CICIs into the global LEI system
Key Resources:
• https://www.ciciutility.org/
• http://www.leiroc.org
Legal Entity Identifier
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
PROJECT STATUS
2012-30 BWG
LEI is not required for 2014 reporting
Asked to include available LEIs but not forced to comply
Accessing LEI data
• Pre-LEIs are complimentary via the CICI website
• Manual process and does not include linking of cusips
• Some data vendors provide LEIs with no extra cost
NAIC Q&A Document:
http://www.naic.org/documents/committees_e_app_blanks_related_filing
_issues_lei_guidance.pdf
Legal Entity Identifier
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TAKEAWAY
2012-30 BWG
Commercial Mortgage Loans
Modify methodology and instructions for the RBC and AVR
Reflect elimination of MEAF used to adjust factors for certain lines
To accurately reflect the actual risk profile of individual mortgage loans
Eliminate the MEAF
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
2013-27 BWG
WHAT
WHY
Commercial Mortgage Loans
Life RBC Working Group adopted a new methodology for the RBC
calculation in 2013
The AVR incorporated factors that represented the mid-range of the
factors that will be used upon full implementation
An AVR will be implemented for commercial loan mortgages that will be
parallel with the methodology used for Life and Fraternal RBC
Changes to AVR expected to be adopted during the June conference
calls
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TAKEAWAY
2013-27 BWG
STACR / Mortgage-Referenced Notes
New Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR)
Issued by Freddie Mac
Not guaranteed by Freddie Mac
Function like an RMBS without
a specific pool of mortgages
More risk allocated to investors
than other FHLMC securities
Not rated
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
Clarification for guidance that applies to these securities
Not eligible for SSAP 43R treatment
Reported under SSAP No. 26 – Bonds, Excluding Loan-Backed
and Structured Securities
Excluded from the exempt calculation and should be filed through
the SVO
STACR / Mortgage-Referenced Notes
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Structured Notes
Proposed new disclosure to Note 5-Investments for Structured Notes
Measure pervasiveness of these types of investments
Review definition of Structured Notes to incorporate into the following
disclosure:
CUSIP Identification Actual Cost Fair Value
Book / Adjusted
Carrying Value
Mortgage-Referenced
Security (Y/N)
Total
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
2014-06 BWGNAIC FASB IASB Other
Best
Practices
Preferred Stock Exchange Traded Funds
ETFs that trade largely in preferred stock carry similar characteristics
to a preferred stock investment
Provisions for placing bond holding ETFs on D1
But no guidance allowing for similar treatment of preferred stock
investing funds
Certain ETFs now eligible for treatment as preferred stock
Can be reported on D-2.1 rather than D-2.2
Significant decrease in the risk factors for AVR and RBC
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
PracticesSAPWG 2012-30
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Single-Member and Single-Asset LLCs – Underlying Asset is Real Estate
Insurance company maintains 100% control and the underlying asset
is real estate
Currently receive BA treatment
Requested to receive Schedule A treatment under SSAP No. 40 as
they more closely resemble a direct investment in real estate
This could dramatically affect
certain RBC calculations
Insurance
Type
BA RBC
Charge
A RBC
Charge
Life 23% pre tax 15% pre tax
P&C 20% pre tax 10% pre tax
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
SAPWG 2013-17
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
SSAP No. 86 Concept Revision
Clarification and possible changes for margin reporting
The daily true up features inherent in certain centrally cleared
derivatives are being reported inconsistently by insurers and the best
practice for how to report on these issues
• The NAIC staff are now in position to start the issue paper for
centrally cleared derivatives which will be released this year
Possible changes for Schedule DB part B
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
SAPWG 2013-13
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Investment Classification Review
Classification system review the NAIC uses for securities that are
classed outside their industry standard names
NAIC received questions on proper treatment and classification of
certain types of mutual funds
Inconsistency in how these types of investments are reported
Identified for review
• SSAP No. 26 | SSAP No. 30
• SSAP No. 32 | SSAP No. 43R
• SSAP No. 48
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
SAPWG 2013-36
WHAT
WHY
• Lack of definitions for certain types of investments
• Variations between SAP definitions and FASB or SEC definitions
• Allowing “look-through” accounting for certain types of investments
• Inconsistencies for reporting items on Schedule D and Schedule BA
• ‘Investment Matrix’ was issued identifying specific items to be
addressed
• Intent for this project’s scope is to be narrow and specific to certain
investment types
Investment Classification Review
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
ISSUES IDENTIFIED
TAKEAWAY
SAPWG 2013-36
Separate Accounts Update
Develop guidelines for BOLI & COLI products
Incorporate suggested principles for insulating separate account
assets for non-variable products.
To clarify the accounting and reporting for these types of products
Updated proposal posted to website and comments are due June 6
Monitor the progress of this working group:
• http://www.naic.org/committees_e_sep_acctg_risk_charge.htm
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
SARWG
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Offsetting/Netting of Assets and Liabilities
The disclosure for Offsetting and Netting of Assets and Liabilities will
now be data captured
To report with similar transactions in the Investment Note
Review if your company offsets and reports certain investments in
accordance with a valid right of offset per SSAP No. 64:
• Net derivatives
• Repurchase and reverse repurchase
• Securities borrowing and securities lending assets and liabilities
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
2013-26 BWG
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Broker Receivables
ACLI proposes to change to a “settlement date” basis for determining
the RBC charge only
No change is proposed to the “trade date” basis of annual statement
reporting
Result in a more accurate RBC for Life insurers
NAIC staff developed a model that generated weighted average
factors for Life [1.4%], P&C [2.4%] and Health [2.4%]
Won’t be effective until 2015 at the earliest
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
Capital Adequacy Task Force
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Real Estate / Mortgage Loans / Other
Schedules A, B, and BA: add electronic-only columns for postal code
and property type
Schedules B and BA only, add an electronic-only column for maturity
date
Change the state column to accept the three-character country code
Provide regulators with basic information to better determine risk profiles
Evaluate investments that have a real estate or mortgage loan element
to determine the Postal Code, Property Type, and Maturity Date
2014-11 BWG
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
Repurchase Agreements
Provide clear, explicit and consistent accounting and reporting guidance
for Long-duration Repurchase Agreements (repos)
Create regulatory parity between short and long duration repos
Ascertain that long-duration repos will be admitted assets
If your company owns long-duration repos, track progress on these
discussions at the Restricted Asset Subgroup website:
http://www.naic.org/committees_e_app_restricted_asset_sg.htm
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
Restricted Asset Subgroup
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Investment Risk-Based Capital
Recalculation of RBC factors
Investigating if there is a better way to tie the factors to the actual
default rates of securities
IRBCWG has the non-modeled fixed income asset factors
Now available for testing by industry
SVO recalibration project may be leveraged
• 13X3 system discussed (13 designation levels, 3 collateral types)
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Recalibration Project
Increase the granularity of designations
Potentially move from 6 to 14 designations
More precise credit quality designations
Current proposal includes expansion of +/-
system
Preliminary assessment of impact of
changes to this system has been
performed
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
Hybrid Financial Instruments
Hybrid Securities with embedded derivatives may require bifurcation of
the option
Determining factor is deciding whether the “embedded feature is
considered clearly and closely related to the host contract”
In following ASC 815-15, the step to determine whether the host
security is more akin to debt or equity, requires judgment to decide
what method to use
This has caused diversity in practice
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
Common approaches used to determine whether the host contract is
more akin to equity or debt:
• “Whole Instrument” approach – all terms and conditions are
considered including the embedded feature
• “Chameleon” approach – all terms and conditions are considered
except the embedded feature
The “whole instrument” approach should be used when the security is
sold in the form of a share
Yet to determine how entities “would consider the relevant terms and
features of the hybrid instrument and weigh such features”
Continued deliberation on June 12
Hybrid Financial Instruments
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TAKEAWAY
Other Items
Additional disclosures required for certain transfers accounted as sales
by transaction type
Final ASU to be issued during Q2 2014
Require disclosures in an investment company’s financial statements
that will provide transparency into the risks, returns, and expenses of an
investee that is also an investment company
To be determined whether to proceed with issuance of a proposed ASU
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TRANSFERS AND SERVICING: REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
AND SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS
INVESTMENT COMPANIES: DISCLOSURES ABOUT INVESTMENTS
IN ANOTHER INVESTMENT COMPANY
Other Items
To improve, through disclosure, financial reporting about a reporting
entity’s exposure to liquidity risk and interest rate risk
The Board will reconsider the objective of the project
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
ACCOUNTING FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: INTEREST RATE DISCLOSURE
Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors
Reclassification of residential real estate collateralized consumer
mortgage loans upon foreclosure
To reduce diversity by clarifying when an in substance repossession or
foreclosure occurs
Record foreclosed residential real estate when (1) the creditor obtains
legal title or (2) the borrower conveys all interest to the creditor
Disclose (1) the amount of residential real estate held by the creditor
and (2) residential mortgage loans that are in the process of foreclosure
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
ASU 2014-04
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
PCC and FASB will mutually agree on a set of criteria to decide if/when
alternatives U.S. GAAP are warranted for private companies. The PCC
will review and propose alternatives within U.S. GAAP to address the
needs of users of private company financial statements.
PCC serves as the primary advisory body to the FASB on the
appropriate treatment for private companies for items under active
consideration on the FASB’s technical agenda
Improve process of setting accounting standards for private companies
Insurers should be aware of changes in this new body of guidance
Private Company Council (PCC)
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
PCC issued an amendment allowing for hedge accounting treatment
without effectiveness testing if certain criteria are met
Private companies without access to fixed rate funding often enter into
swap agreements to convert their floating rate exposure to fixed
Often causes income volatility since the entities are not sophisticated
enough to comply with hedge accounting requirements
Primarily applies to private companies who have issued debt.
PCC Derivatives Hedging
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
ASU 2014-03
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
IFRS and Investments
Replacing IAS 39 with IFRS 9: Financial Instruments
Effective date January 2018
The project has been split into three phases:
• Phase 1: Classification & Measurement
• Phase 2: Impairment Methodology
• Phase 3: Hedge Accounting
New standard takes a single approach to determining the measurement
treatment of financial assets
Based on how an entity manages its financial instruments and the
contractual cash flow characteristics of the assets
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
IAS 39 vs. IFRS 9
IAS 39 IFRS 9
Classified as:
Fair Value through Profit & Loss
Held to Maturity
Loans & Receivables
Available for Sale
Classified as:
Amortised Cost
Fair Value
OCI as the residual FV category FVTPL as the residual FV category
Reclassification into the FVTPL category after
initial recognition is prohibited. Reclassifications
out of FVTPL are permitted subject to meeting
certain criteria
Reclassifications are required when there is a
change in business model
Incurred Loss model for impairment Expected Loss model for impairment
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
Financial Instruments – Classification and Measurement
Re-deliberating aspects of FASB’s tentative classification and
measurement model and IFRS 9: Classification and Measurement
Reduce key differences between FASB and IASB models
Citing the complexity known is better than the complexity unknown,
FASB decided to abandon the contractual cash flow characteristics test
and the business model test
FASB continues to re-deliberate about classification
Likely that convergence with IFRS 9 in equity security treatment will
happen
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
IFRS 9 moves to a three bucket expected credit loss approach
Reflects the deterioration in the credit quality of the assets
• Bucket One – Financial assets where there has been no identified
credit deterioration since initial recognition
• Bucket Two / Three – Once transferred from Bucket One, the assets
would have an allowance measured as the lifetime expected credit
losses. For bucket Two, this is at a portfolio level, while Bucket Three
would be at the individual instrument level. Portfolios would be
transferred from Bucket One to Bucket Two, while individual
instruments would be transferred to Bucket Three.
IFRS 9 and Impairment
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
Financial Instruments – Impairment
Considered changing the model for impairment recognition removing
the “probable threshold” approach
In favor of an approach that better reflects the deterioration of credit
quality
To provide a common solution for impairment accounting and
incorporation of the IFRS 9 three bucket approach
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
Financial Instruments – Impairment
Significant issues about understanding, operationalizing, and auditing
were raised through feedback
As of March 12, 2014 FASB had decided not to pursue an exposure
draft for the three bucket approach
FASB continues to deliberate about alternative approaches to
impairment of financial instruments
Convergence seems less and less likely with IASB’s continuing pursuit
of the three bucket model
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TAKEAWAY
CURRENT STATUS
IFRS 9 and Hedging
Principle-based approach rather than rule-based in FAS 133
• Align risk management with hedge accounting
• Include Qualitative measures
• Application of Judgment
• Forward Looking approach
Expands the addressable risks
• Hedging aggregated exposures
• Hedging non-financial items
Non-Derivative assets can be considered hedging instruments
Extensive new disclosures
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
Financial Instruments – Hedging
FASB decided to perform research on the hedging phase of the project
Current feedback has found that U.S. constituents expressed support
for the certain aspects of IASB proposals
FASB may perform additional outreach activities for more feedback
FASB has not spent significant time on the hedging phase of its
financial instruments project
It is unclear to what extent the provisions of the IASB new model will
affect future FASB discussions
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
TAKEAWAY
MBS Margining
Federal Reserve Bank of NY Treasury Market Practices Group (TMPG)
put forward a recommendation to introduce margin requirements for all
forward settling MBS transactions in late 2012
The posting of margin is a common practice in the trading of agency
MBS between members of the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division
(MBSD) of the Fixed-Income Clearing Corporation, which became a
central counterparty (CCP) in April 2012
Margining is less common in bilateral agency MBS trading between
dealers and customers that are not MBSD members
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
WHAT
WHY
MBS Margining
Recommended that margining apply to four agency MBS categories:
• To-Be-Announced (TBA) transactions
• Specified Pool transactions
• Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM) transactions
• Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO) transactions
Recommended that counterparties enter into a master agreement that
defines the margining aspects of relationships:
• Frequency and timing of collateral calls
• Collateral eligibility
• Thresholds, valuations, and liquidation terms
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
TAKEAWAY
Stay Current on Guidance Changes
Auditors
Software Providers
Consultants
SAP – NAIC
U.S. GAAP – FASB
PCC – FASB
IFRS – IASB
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
PARTNER WITH PROVIDERS
DON’T JUST FOLLOW ONE BASIS
Stay Current on Guidance Changes
NAIC FASB IASB OtherBest
Practices
GET INVOLVED
Attend an NAIC meeting
Join an industry trade group (e.g. ACLI, AIA, AHIP)
Network at IASA events
Respond to exposure drafts from the FASB, IASB, NAIC
IASA 86TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW
Please Complete the Session Evaluation Form on the Conference App and Include Your Conference Registration ID# to be Included in a Drawing for a Free Conference Registration for the 2014 Annual Conference!NOTE: Your Conference Registration ID# is Located at the
Bottom Left Hand Corner of Your Badge.