15
1 assuredcommunications 8/27/22 Gene Cavallucci Harris Corporation NCMA Cape Canaveral Chapter June 2008 Recent Developments in Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Recent Developments in Federal Procurement 2007-2008

  • Upload
    kedma

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Recent Developments in Federal Procurement 2007-2008. Agenda. Statutes and Regulations Bid Protests Cost and Accounting Matters Ethics and Compliance Performance Issues. Statues & Regulations. DOD Authorization Act – Section 815(b) (10 U.S.C. 2379) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

1 assuredcommunications™

4/21/23

Gene Cavallucci

Harris Corporation

NCMA

Cape Canaveral Chapter

June 2008

Recent Developments in

Federal Procurement

2007-2008

Page 2: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

2 assuredcommunications™

Agenda

• Statutes and Regulations

• Bid Protests

• Cost and Accounting Matters

• Ethics and Compliance

• Performance Issues

Page 3: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

3 assuredcommunications™

Statues & Regulations

• DOD Authorization Act – Section 815(b) (10 U.S.C. 2379)– Potential impact on qualifying items as “commercial” under

DFARS– Subsystems, Components and Spare Parts as Commercial

Items• Terms “general public” and “non-governmental entities” in the

DFARS will not include the– Federal Government, or a

– State, local or foreign government

• Proposed FAR Change re Compliance, Plans, Training and Internal Controls– 73 Fed. Reg. 28407 (May 16, 2008)– Comment deadline is July 15, 2008

Page 4: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

4 assuredcommunications™

Statutes & Regulations (con’d)

– Rules call for:• Mandatory disclosure by contractor whenever reasonable

grounds to believe a violation of the civil False Claims Act (FCA) in connection with a contract or subcontract or other criminal laws occurs

• “full cooperation” w/government agencies responsible for audit, investigation and corrective action

– Applies to all federal contracts exceeding $5 million and a 120 day performance period (Previous exceptions for commercial and non US contracts deleted)

– Issues:• Many key terms not defined• Waiver of:

– 5th Amendment Rights– attorney client privilege

• Decision to conduct internal investigations

Page 5: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

5 assuredcommunications™

Statutes & Regulations (con’d)

• New Contracts Appeal Board Established by 2008 Legislative Branch Appropriations Act– Within the GAO– Hear disputes under CDA of 1978:

• Architect of the Capital

• GAO

• GPO

• Library of Congress

• CBO

• U.S. Capital Police

• Other legislative branch agencies, offices, boards and commissions

Page 6: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

6 assuredcommunications™

Statutes & Regulations (con’d)

• SBA Proposes Set – Aside Rules for “WOSB” (January 2008) http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&o=090000648053aac6

– Agencies can restrict competition under procurements valued at $3M ($5M for manufacturing)

– Only in industries where WOSB are underrepresented”, and

• TSA Covered by FAR & CICA (Again)– Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-161)

• Eliminated TSA’s exemption from FAR and CICA competition rules

• TSA had been exempt for 6 years

Page 7: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

7 assuredcommunications™

Bid Protests

– 2007: 1,318 Protests filed at GAO• 48 more than in 2006

• 234 more than in 2001

• 70% denied

– Congressional interest because:• “Too many frivolous protests”

• Recent Boeing protest highlights issue

– AF Task Force• AF protests up

• AFGC trying to examine cause

Page 8: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

8 assuredcommunications™

Bid Protests (con’d)

• Protest Decisions– VRC, Inc. B-310100, November 2, 2007

• VRC incumbent and prime in pursuit of National Guard contract (JCSSP)

• MPSC sub to VRC

• TCI part owner of MPSC– Prime to National Guard as CETA

– Employee to evaluate proposals under JCSSP

– 5 proposals received, including VRC’s• CO notified VRC of intent to reject prop because of OCI• VRC response to OCI rejected as inadequate• VRC protests to GAO• VRC contends CO approved mitigation plan offered by VRC

Page 9: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

9 assuredcommunications™

Bid Protests (con’d)

– GAO denied protest• No evidence that CO approved VCR plan• CO has discretion to decide OCI factual issues (appearance

insufficient)• Once OCI facts exist, harm is presumed unless adequately

avoided or mitigated– Lessons learned?

• PWC Logistics Services Co., B-310559, January 11, 2008– Protest dismissed because of violation of protective order by

protestors– Protected information inadvertently disclosed by lawyer but

disseminated within company after request to return information made

– Reconsideration denied March, 2008

Page 10: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

10 assuredcommunications™

Bid Protests (con’d)

• Serco, Inc. v. U.S. March 5, 2008 http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Sercoopdredacted.pdf

– Protests by eight unsuccessful offerors sustained– $50 billion GWAC for IT products/services– Flaws found in price evaluation and best value

tradeoff analysis• Statistical impression in tech scoring “intensified the

need…for reasoned decisions considering price and, related best values.”

Page 11: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

11 assuredcommunications™

Costs & Accounting

• Limitations on Subcontractor’s “Mark-up Costs”– DFARS change (April 26, 2007) [72 Fed. Reg. 20758]

• Government may disallow “excessive pass through charges” on subcontracts where total subcontract costs exceeds 70% of contract value

• “excessive charges” are costs and profit where the contractor cannot demonstrate “substantive value” to performance

• Issue if prime accounting rules allocate G&A to subcontract costs

• CAS 418 Definition of “Homogenous Cost Pools”– AM General LLC, 06-1 BCA pp. 33, 190

Page 12: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

12 assuredcommunications™

Cost & Accounting (con’d)

– Appellant’s motion for reconsideration granted – Vacated prior decision holding that an O/H pool that

included capital facilities used for commercial HUMMER production and was allocated to all HUMMER production violated the homogeneity requirement of CAS 418

– NDIA filed amicus brief– Found government had failed to address materiality in

its determination

Page 13: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

13 assuredcommunications™

Ethics & Compliance

• Federal Tax Certification– Final FAR rule published April 22, 2008

[73 Fed. Reg. 21791]– All offerors must certify whether delinquent federal

taxes greater than $3,000 is owed– Such delinquency must be considered in

responsibility determination– Can be ground for suspension/debarment– Delinquency exists only after all appeal rights

exhausted

Page 14: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

14 assuredcommunications™

Performance Issues

• Implied Authority Still Works– Stevens Van Lines v. U.S. (January 23, 2008),

80 Fed. Cl. 276• COFC held that government official has implied

authority to bind government when (a) authority is an integral part of the duties assigned and (b) when power to contract is “appropriate or essential” to the performance of the employee’s duties

– COFC Statute of Limitations is Six Years • John R. Sand & Gravel v. U.S. (January 8, 2008)

128 S. Ct. 750– USSC held that COFC jurisdiction under the Tucker Act is

barred after 6 years

Page 15: Recent Developments  in  Federal Procurement 2007-2008

Apr 21, 2023

15 assuredcommunications™

Performance Issues (con’d)

– No equitable tolling or waiver is permitted– Court may raise issue even if parties do not

• Electronic “Signed” Doesn’t Work – Tecknocraft, Inc., April 3, 2008, ASBCA No. 55438– ASBCA held electronic “signed” by contractor to a CDA claim

certification sent by email held invalid– Held to be “incurable defect”

• Must State “Sum Certain” for CDA Claim – Rex Systems, Inc. November 6, 2007, 07-2 BCA p. 33718– Claim of a “15% license fee at a minimum” was not a sum

certain– Appeal dismissed