Upload
ayan-mitra
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Recent Developments in Dark Matter Detection
1/3
Recent Developments in Dark Matter Detection
Ayan Mitra
M.Sc. Cosmology
Since 1930s there has been enormous speculations in the physics society on the presence
of dark matter and various projects have been undertaken one after other with the aim to
get some experimental verification and proof on the presence of dark matter. We aim topresent here a brief outline of the developments and the results of the projects undergone
and still going on with the aim of finding some dark matter evidence.
Dark matter(DM) can be classified into two broad
categories: 1. Baryonic 2. Non Baryonic. The latercan be subdivided into:1.Hot DM(HDM) 2.Cold
DM(CDM), of which the search for CDM is most
ongoing in the process of trying to detect theWeakly Interacting massive Particles(WIMPs).
There are direct ways and indirect ways of detection
which are used on ground based or satellite based
set ups. The recent developments in detectingWIMPs are as follows: I)Satellite based:
a) PAMELA-launched in 2006-Payload forAntimatter Exploration & Light nucleiAstrophysics.
1) Expected to detect evidence for DM
annihilation.2) Preliminary data indicate an excess of
positrons in the energy range of 10~60
GeV: thought to be a sign of DM
annihilation.3) Results however not fully convincing,as
there are possibilities that mission was
confusing positrons with far largenumbers of protons reaching its
detectors.
b) Fermi Gamma Ray Telescope-Launched in2008
1) One of the primary missions being,probe
DM by looking for an excess of gammarays from the center of the Milky Way.
2) The team working with Fermis maininstrument Large Area Telescope(LAT)
found positrons with energies upto 200GeV implying highly massive DM
particles.
Outlooks: the results very much rule out the
DM interpretation of the high energeticpositrons.No way to distinguish between
sources of positrons whether from DM or
pulsars.If positrons of even higher energiescontinue to pop in then the pulsar
explanation will also become strained.
II) Ground Based :a) LHC: indirect method of measurement.
1) The Compact Muon Solenoid ( CMSresults in relation to SUSY show that on
collisions of proton-proton pair rarely
sparticles may be produced, the lightest
of which is a dark matter candidate as itis stable.
2) Till January 2011, some 3 trillion p-p
collisions were examined and 13 SUSYlike ones were found of them. Although
no evidence of sparticles were found this
measurement narrows down the area forDM research significantly.
b) PICASSO- Project in Canada to Search fo
Susy Objects- a direct detection experiment.
[1]
8/3/2019 Recent Developments in Dark Matter Detection
2/3
1) Looking for most favorable candidate
for cold DM namely,neutralino(WIMPs)
2) As of July 2009 no DM signal has beenfound.
c) DAMA/LIBRA & DAMA NaI( Italy)
1) Direct detection using scintillations2) DM particle investigation in galactic
halo by exploiting DM annual
modulation signature.3) Flash rates of scintillations highest in
June and lowest in December,implying
detection evidence of DM.
4) Results of this group though is notwidely accepted in the community.
d) CDMS-The Cryogenic DM
Search( Minnesota) .
1) Direct measurement of DM (WIMPScatter)
2) Data set of 2003 has not yielded in anyevidence of WIMPS
3) From 2008-09 data set processed using
blinding method show 2 events with
characteristics consistent for those ofWIMPS.
4) However it can be that both events are
due to background particles.e) DRIFT-Directional Recoil Identification
From Tracks.
1) Attempt to utilize WIMP wind byusing directionality sensitive DM
detector.
2) No significant results as of now.f) Super Kamiokande ( Japan)-
1) Detection of high energy neutrino
signals resulting from WIMP
annihilation in earth, the sun, galacticcenters.
2) Work mainly on Hot DM.
Baryonic DM:
III) MACHO: Massive Astrophysical
Condensed Halo Objects.
a) EROS1) EROS I (1990-95)- No halo
microlensing event found.
2) EROS 2(1996-03) From microlensing
analysis of small magellanic cloud
,stringent limits are put on the amount
of galactic DM made of compact
objects.Mass between 2 x 10(exp -7)solar mass and 1 solar mass can
account for more than 25% of the mass
ofstandard,spherical,isothermal,isotropic,
galactic halo of 4 x 10(exp 11) solar
mass with 50 KPc radius volume.b) The MACHO project(1992-99) ( USA &
Australia)
1) Results inferred that less than 1% halo
mass is red dwarf.2) This missing mass problem is no
solved by MACHO.
Conclusion:
While some of the projects are still runningyet not many of them has given anything
concrete as yet,but specially the results ofLHC are being eagerly awaited for by the
physics community for any breakthroughs
in DM frontier.i
[2]
8/3/2019 Recent Developments in Dark Matter Detection
3/3
i References:
1) Retrieved from www.wikipedia.org
2) Retrieved from http://www.universetoday.com/82864/hunt-for-dark-matter-closes-in-at-the-lhc/
3) Retrieved from http://www.oglethorpe.edu/faculty/~m_rulison/Astronomy/Group/Spring%2099/dark_matter.htm
4) Retrieved from https://news.slac.stanford.edu/features/fermi-gamma-ray-space-telescope-confirms-
puzzling-preponderance-positrons5) Retrieved from http://eros.in2p3.fr/publications.html
6)Bergstrom, L. (2010, february 09). http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0595.
6)Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0595
7)Debtosh Chowdhury, C. J. (2009, september 07). Results from PAMELA, ATIC and FERMI :
Pulsars or Dark Matter ?8)Fermi LAT Collaboration: M. Ackermann, M. A. (2011, september 09).
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0521. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0521
9)Marco Farina, M. K. (18 Apr 2011). Implications of XENON100 and LHC results for Dark Mattermodels.